Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Gary Stern

Posted on March 6, 2011August 9, 2018

Virtual Job Fairs Becoming More of a Reality

After failing to find a supply-chain or purchasing-agent job through networking and career websites, Antonio Beasley turned to the Big East Virtual Career Fair last November.


The 30-year-old Louisville, Kentucky, resident was pleasantly surprised to find roughly 30 firms there, and he contacted all of the recruiters online by writing a pithy introductory letter. About 10 to 12 answered with automated e-mail responses, and five recruiters even wrote a personal note. He obtained e-mail addresses from the recruiters and stayed in touch with several who said more supply-chain jobs could open up in the first quarter.


For job seekers, virtual career fairs are appealing because they’re a way to get your foot in the door without having to walk out the door. Similarly, virtual fairs are growing in popularity with employers because they can significantly expand their reach nationally and internationally at minimal expense. The Virtual Edge Institute, an organization in Pleasanton, California, whose member firms build online platforms for job fairs, says the number of fairs jumped 31 percent from 2009 to 2010, and its members expect 40 percent growth in 2011. The group declined to release the total number of fairs.


Wes Reel, a military recruiter for Houston-based Waste Management Inc., tested out three virtual job fairs last year, including Milicruit, which targets former military personnel, and Unicruit, which is aimed at college students. He sought to fill about 1,000 positions, including management trainees, maintenance directors, mechanics and accountants.


Virtual fairs usually last about five hours, though recruiters can receive


résumés online for as long as a week after the event. In its virtual “booth,” Waste Management provided links to its online career site, obtained résumés from candidates and interacted with applicants in a live chat room. Reel prepared a brief written statement that he sent to applicants online, describing available jobs. After he reviewed résumés, he sent a personal note to promising applicants.


Reel and other recruiters have found that traditional job fairs don’t always pay off. In addition to the time and expense of attending them in person, recruiters often find them inefficient because many people stop by their booth who don’t possess the right skills.


What’s more, Reel points out, transcribing e-mail addresses from lists after a job fair is time consuming. At virtual fairs on the other hand, recruiters pre-screen résumés, contact candidates who are a potential fit and store e-mail addresses automatically in their company’s computer system. If applicants pass the initial screening in the virtual fair, they typically must complete a questionnaire, take a behavioral test and do a telephone interview before meeting a recruiter in person.


Online fairs “are designed to be a first wave for recruiters. That’s it,” says Clark Walter, senior program manager at CDW, a Vernon Hills, Illinois-based company that sells computers and computer-related accessories. He used a virtual fair, for example, to interview students at Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business in November 2010. “CDW collected 61 résumés of potential hires,” he says. “It saved the company time and money and allowed students, even with their busy schedules, to meet employers.” Already, CDW has hired one sales account manager from the Kelley School and is considering other candidates from the university.


Felicia McKinney, another CDW recruiter who attends MBA virtual fairs to fill sales jobs, says that she must observe a candidate in an in-person interview for eye contact, confidence and general demeanor. Even so, she finds virtual fairs a valuable starting point and plans to begin recruiting information technology engineers, along with sales reps, online.


Dan Erling, author of Match: A Systematic, Sane Process for Hiring the Right Person Every Time, notes that some virtual job fairs include video content and webcams and that more will likely incorporate video because employers prefer to observe applicants. Without video, he says, virtual job fairs are “one-dimensional, lacking body language.”


But even with video, it is still easy to get distracted at a virtual job fair. Kevin O’Brien, vice president for business development at Chicago-based UBM Studios, which runs Milicruit and Unicruit, urges recruiters to man their online booths at all times. Too often, he says, recruiters try to multitask and leave the booth vacant.


It’s too early to determine the return on investment for Waste Management, Reel says, but virtual job fairs tend to be cost effective because of travel expense savings. Most online job fairs cost companies about $1,000, he says, but those organized by business schools can be free. There’s always the risk, however, of poor attendance. Reel attended one fair where virtually no one showed up. “The problem,” he says, “was poor execution of marketing and advertising to the targeted candidates.”


Workforce Management, February 2011, p. 11 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on December 5, 2010August 9, 2018

Some Companies Are Playing to the ‘Crowd’

When the economic downturn forced Dassault Systèmes SolidWorks Corp., a Concord, Massachusetts-based software company, to reduce its budget in 2009, Jeff Ray, the CEO, made it a group decision.


He tried an online version of “crowd sourcing”—an approach to group decision-making that taps the collective intelligence of the staff rather than just the executive team. Using custom software, employees responded online with budget suggestions and commented on co-workers’ ideas.


The staff had two weeks to make cost-cutting suggestions, which were vetted by Dave Stott, the chief financial officer, who had final say on implementation. To participate, staff members had to select a screen name, but most people used their actual name, Stott says. Employees could choose to respond anonymously if they preferred; participation was voluntary.


About 300 of the 800 domestic and international employees proposed 100 cutbacks that included eliminating summer outings and holiday parties, cutting back on Web conferences and reducing business travel. The company saved $30 million, including $8 million by slashing business travel, and didn’t lay off a single employee. Not every staff idea was implemented, of course. For example, the company rejected a job-sharing suggestion.


Why use crowd sourcing? Stott says the executive team wanted the staff’s “ideas and buy-in and wanted to give them ownership of the problem.” Previously, the company had used crowd sourcing effectively to elicit customer feedback on new products. It created a dynamic atmosphere throughout the company where everyone “started thinking twice about spending and finding better ways to do things,” Stott says.


Crowd sourcing can boost productivity and raise morale because staff members feel involved in problem-solving, rather than passive recipients of executive decisions. “We involved everyone in the process because we’re all going through it,” Stott says. “It also reinforced our culture of transparency.”


Crowd sourcing can also prove to be efficient and speedy. The entire staff has long contributed projects at USAA, the San Antonio-based insurance and financial services company targeted at military personnel, but, in the past, collaboration took considerable time. With crowd sourcing, ideas can percolate within a day or two after a project or problem is posted online.


It took only five months this year for USAA to implement 44 ideas triggered by crowd sourcing, according to Mick Simonelli, who is assistant vice president at USAA. For example, one idea led to streamlining the mortgage process, reducing paperwork and increasing productivity.


USAA provides four criteria for crowd sourcing suggestions including increasing revenue, reducing costs, improving member benefits and making processes more efficient. Simonelli says crowd sourcing works best when the challenge presented is clearly defined and includes detailed direction.


What’s more, if management asks employees for problem-solving ideas, it needs to report back on them and act on some. “Anyone who does a good job at crowd sourcing responds to each and every suggestion,” says Stephen Shapiro, author of The Little Book of Big Innovation Ideas.


He also warns that employers should be alert to the risk that employees will submit inappropriate or confidential responses. At DS SolidWorks, for example, some staff conveyed confidential information, Stott says. In the future, he adds, the company will urge staff to be more discreet.


Workforce Management, November 2010, p. 6 — Subscribe Now!


 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress