Skip to content

Workforce

Author: James Tehrani

Posted on June 20, 2016July 30, 2018

Who to Hire When Your Culture Sucks

If there’s anything we love as HR/talent pros, it’s talking about culture. We love talking about how the culture at our company is different, what we value and how we reward people according to our cultural norms.

But the dirty little secret is most people are either actively looking or open to moving to a different opportunity. If you believe a recent 2016 CareerBuilder poll, 3 out of 4 employees would leave your company if the right opportunity came around.

But that’s not you, it’s them. Right?

Sure it is, Sparky.

That stat means one of two things: Either your culture sucks or it doesn’t matter as much as you think it does.

The aforementioned CareerBuilder stat leads to turnover in a good economy, resulting in the blame game inside your company. Who does the company want to blame for rising turnover? HR! Who should be blamed? Probably someone else!

But most HR pros don’t have the time or organizational clout to blame others, so we start to try to stop the bleeding by building a case that our culture is different. We do this in an attempt to differentiate our company on the recruiting and retention trail.

The path is pretty standard. Upgrade workspace and make it cooler. Insert pingpong, foosball and a pool table — in that order — and start recruitment marketing activities designed to compete in a hot market for talent.

Of course, your culture isn’t struggling because you don’t have good ideas or a road map on what you want your real culture to be built on. Your culture struggles because you’ve got mediocre managers.

Crappy managers lead to all kinds of bad outcomes. The most obvious one is a lack of leadership across teams of all sizes and specialties in a company. An absence of leadership leads to team dysfunction, infighting and yes — turnover.

That’s why you probably should stop competing in the superficial culture wars and start getting focused on how you select people to join your company. Whether your culture truly sucks or is just bruised a bit doesn’t really matter — selecting the type of talent who can survive the challenges that exist inside your company is key.

You don’t have to hire superheroes to deal with the cultural challenges inside your company, but you do need to have a road map in mind related to the behavioral strengths that a new hire needs to have to deal with ambiguity, uncertainty and a lack of organizational consensus that accompanies weak culture.

Simply put: Hire the right type of person who can deal with the downside of your culture, and they’ll thrive. If they thrive, odds are they’ll stay.

While it’s impossible to give you notes based on the specific cultural challenges you face, there are some common elements to candidates who can survive in crappy cultures.

First up, star employees in mediocre corporate cultures tend to have low sensitivity; inconsistency or even outright hostility doesn’t fluster them. They take each day as it comes, remaining level-headed and calm when others around them are melting.

Low sensitivity doesn’t mean someone doesn’t care. It simply means you don’t have to talk someone off the ledge when things don’t go as planned. Without the norms of a strong corporate culture, inconsistency in outcomes, feedback and internal politics is the rule rather than the exception.

Another common behavioral characteristic is the ability to deal with chaos. Dealing with chaos requires someone with low-rules orientation.

An employee with low-rules orientation wants to help determine the best possible solution for each circumstance. Inconsistent company culture maximizes that circumstance for all employees, so it stands to reason that the person who can create new solutions on the fly is going to be a winner.

Finally, these employees are almost always more aggressive than their peers. Uncertainty leads to a natural advantage for those with high-assertiveness levels. While no one likes an asshole, there are jerks, sharks or whatever name you want to give assertive people who almost always get more done than passive employees. That reality is even truer when cultural norms aren’t there to guide the way for the masses.

Great HR pros are pragmatic to a fault, which leads to our ability to understand we might be working for companies with room to grow related to culture.

While you’re helping build a culture you can be proud of, do yourself a favor: Start recruiting the type of person who can thrive in that freak show you call a company.

Kris Dunn, the chief human resources officer at Kinetix, is a Workforce contributing editor. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

 

Posted on June 19, 2016June 29, 2023

SHRM ’16: MetLife’s Jeff Tulloch Talks Retirement Planning

Diversity Casual People Employee Retirement Discussion Brainstorming Concept

It seems like a lazy Sunday in The District, but I’m already pounding the keys on my laptop at the SHRM 2016 Annual Conference & Exposition. I even had my first interview with Jeff Tulloch, MetLife’s vice president of the PlanSmart, Workplace Benefits and Business Advantage group.

Since I have retirement on my mind with my latest “Last Word” column and Workforce’s upcoming July issue on retirement, I talked to Tulloch about what companies can do to help workers with retirement. An edited transcript follows.

Whatever Works: How do you get past the white noise that many employees hear when it comes to retirement planning?

Jeff Tulloch
Jeff Tulloch, MetLife

Jeff Tulloch: The first component is, where we are now compared to 10 years ago, people have woken up to, ‘OK, my parents maybe had a pension plan and they were taken care of, and, well, I don’t have that. So now, what do I do? How do I get myself secure?’ So I think there’s the stark reality that people now have. ‘I need to do something,’ but they don’t know where to go. ‘I see things in the paper, I see things in the magazines, I see things online, I talk to my friends.’ So getting past the white noise, we have this workshop [PlanSmart] offering that is a voluntary benefit. You come if you want. You’re not forced to go. And that gets people to take the first step forward. ‘I know I need information. I just don’t know what I need.’ And then once they get there, there’s a variety of information that’s provided to them that helps get them to a better spot. And then they can self-select if they want to take things to the next step, which is meeting with a financial adviser one on one. So it’s still difficult because, obviously, a large population is not financially well but that forum where — you’re not forced into it, you go if you want — and then you self-select how far you want to go with it helps get people [pointed] in the right direction.

WW: What mistakes are companies making in explaining retirement benefits?

Tulloch: I would say one would be thinking that the 401(k) plan is it. It’s the answer. And it’s not. The average balance nowadays is $100,000, maybe a little less than that. And that’s the average. A lot of people have a lot less. Probably one mistake is: ‘We put a lot of effort into our 401(k) plan, we did a great job of getting more people into it and contributing more, so we’ve done our job.’ And that’s just one component, one mistake. A second one kind of playing off that would be not realizing how stressed out people are regarding their financial matters and how that drains on the company’s productivity. ‘I’m on the phone with people trying to figure stuff out or I’m stressed out online looking stuff up, or I’m stressed out and therefore missing deadlines and not as productive as I should be.’ So I think those two things go together.

WW: Has the mentality changed on how employers approach employee retirement over the years?

Tulloch: I don’t know that I’d say it’s completely changed. I think [it’s] the reality of where companies are now financially and the challenge to be more and more competitive relative to who they are competing against. Companies [are] being stretched to figure out how to lower expenses. That’s the reality. The people we interact with, large corporations, they want to do what’s right. I think the same passion is generally there to help employees, but then there’s the reality of, ‘We can’t give you a pension plan anymore.’

WW: What about the smaller employers?

Tulloch: They are even more challenged just because of the resources available to them. And a small employer, if I’m the owner or one of the key managers, I’m so focused on the 14 jobs I have within the company that I’m stressed to figure out what to do for the employees. So that’s tough. There are tools out there to provide people with access to information, whether it’s online calculators or newsletters, things like that.

WW: What three bullet points do you have for companies to provide best practices to help employees with retirement planning?

Tulloch: The first would be drive a culture of helping support people financially from the top down. Make sure it’s not just something that an upper-level manager is supporting. Really start at the top, the CEO, the owner of the business,  and really say, ‘This is important. We’re committed to it. We want our employees to be in a good spot, and we’re going to do everything we can.’

One would be start with the CEO on down. The second would be realize that there’s a commonality that most of us have some level of financial stress in our lives, but the range of what that stress is is extreme. You and I can be the same age and [have] the same income, but your stress might be that you’re trying to save for college. My stress might be I have a special-needs sibling that I’m taking care of. The third one might be I have no clue what I’m trying to save for retirement.

The second one would be realize there’s a wide need; it’s not just one answer.

The third would be accessibility. Do people want it on the phone, do they want a workshop setting, do they want it online on the intranet? And I think the answer is probably yes to all of that. So how can you deliver something that’s multimedia?

James Tehrani is Workforce’s managing editor. Follow Tehrani on Twitter at @WorkforceJames and like his blog on Facebook at “Whatever Works” blog.

 

 

Posted on June 19, 2016July 30, 2018

The Last Word: The Tired Scare Tactics on Retirement

pensions

To maintain my, ahem, lavish lifestyle, I’ll need to put away $2.2 million by the time I’m ready to retire at age 67, according to the retirement calculator on CNN Money. And with all those Social Security benefits promised to me, I’ll have it made.

As a longtime journalist and editor who torches fifty-dollar bills to light cigars, I scoff at this declaration about my retirement and any fearmongering from the financial experts out there, like this little rant on neglecting saving for retirement from Dave Ramsey: “You’re going to be so bad, you’re going to be ordering the cookbook ‘72 Ways to Prepare Alpo and Love It.’ ”

Well, that’s pretty ruff. I mean, rough.

“I could pawn my new Ferrari F60 for more than that,” I shout at my computer screen, adding a juicy raspberry and “na-na, na-na, boo-boo” for good measure.

Then reality hits.

Huh? Wait, I must have been daydreaming.

“Oh, crap,” I say to myself as I snap back to reality. There’s a better chance of Trump, Cruz, Clinton and Sanders singing “The hills are alive with the sound of music” together in a picturesque meadow than I being able to set aside more than $2 million to retire. Of course, my wife will have to fend for herself under this maddening retirement scenario. Love you, honey, but the “you” in CNN’s “Will you have enough to retire?” tool is second-person singular as far as I can tell, and there’s an “I” and a “me” in “retirement.” So …

But there is a ray of hope. If I hang on to my job until age 76, the calculator tells me I should be on track to have just enough money to retire. That is as long as I plan on being healthy for the rest of my days and I expire at age 92.

If I beat expectations and go for the century mark, or spend the last years of my life regretting those hot dogs and cheeseburgers I ate at backyard barbecues over the years, or those Bombay Sapphire martinis I imbibed at various social gatherings, or if my asthma catches up to me from the summers I spent breathing in smoke and coughing up black junk while grilling ribs at outdoor festivals, I could be hurting even more.

Medical bills: expensive. And playing bridge for money with people who are much better at cards than I am is expensive, too. Unfortunately, I’ve heard bad things about the “I’m gonna strike it rich” by playing the lottery every week strategy for retirement.

It’s not going to be easy for me to save enough for retirement for sure, but women have it even harder, writes Patty Kujawa in our retirement feature, “Making Up the Difference.” She cites a Transamerica report that found women are less likely than men to have access to a 401(k) and are also less likely to participate in one or even contribute to one.

Furthermore, in its 2016 Retirement Confidence survey, the Employee Benefits Research Institute found that 40 percent of unmarried women have less than $1,000 stashed away for retirement. Twenty-two percent of married women were under $1,000 as well.

The EBRI survey also offered this grim analysis: “Despite the fact that women tend to face higher expenses in retirement due to their greater longevity, unmarried women (36 percent) are more likely than their unmarried male counterparts (25 percent) to think they will need to accumulate less than $250,000 for retirement.”

Two hundred and fifty grand? What is this 1950?

If you had a quarter of a million dollars back then, it would be the same as almost $2.5 million today. Problem is it hasn’t been 1950 for, oh, 66 years.

Our friends at the Social Security Administration tell us that if you’re a female millennial born Jan. 1, 1982, you are expected to live almost 86 years, and if you make it to age 70, you’re on pace to live till 89.

That’s great, but we are going to start seeing more people work to 100 and beyond just to pay the bills.

It’s nice to know there are some organizations like Cedars-Sinai that offer a choice in retirement benefits. Employees at the Los Angeles-based health care facility can choose — yes, choose — between a defined contribution plan and a defined benefit plan.

While we can’t “turn back time to the good old days,” it’s important to know there are a lot of workers who are “stressed out” about retirement. Is there anything you, the HR community, can do to communicate differently about retirement? Clearly the scare tactics just aren’t working.

Let’s figure this out soon. I’m almost out of Alpo.

James Tehrani is Workforce’s managing editor. Follow Tehrani on Twitter at @WorkforceJames and like his blog on Facebook at “Whatever Works” blog.

Posted on June 14, 2016June 29, 2023

A Transgender Transition in the Workplace

While legal campaigns targeting the rights of LGBT people seem to be mushrooming across the country, a growing number of employers are leading the way in supporting the rights of transgender people in the workplace.

From Target Corp.’s recent announcement about allowing transgender employees and customers to use the bathroom that matches their gender identity to companies like Facebook Inc., Kroger Co. and Visa Inc. offering coverage for gender reassignment surgery, more employers are looking for ways to attract and retain lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender workers. Offering comprehensive insurance coverage of procedures and therapies related to sex reassignment is one way of doing that.

The number of major U.S. companies surveyed by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation offering transgender-inclusive health care coverage has spiked from 49 in 2009 to 511 in 2016, according to the organization’s annual Corporate Equality Index.

Beck Bailey
Beck Bailey

But what may seem like a dramatic shift is the result of a long and concerted effort by activists and large employers to make the workplace more welcoming to LGBT workers, according to Beck Bailey, deputy director of employee engagement at the Washington, D.C.-based foundation.

“There is a new public awareness of transgender folks with Laverne Cox and Caitlyn Jenner, but corporate America has been committed to and leading in the area of basic nondiscrimination protections for gender identity for 15 years,” he said.

The HRC index rates companies based on their LGBT anti-discrimination policies and practices, whether they offer health coverage for transgender individuals and domestic partner benefits, and other measures.

Despite a wave of anti-gay backlash sparked in part by last year’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of marriage equality, LGBT advocates at Chicago’s Rush University Medical Center found widespread support for their push to offer transgender inclusive health benefits. In January, Rush became the first hospital in Illinois to do so, covering mental health counseling, hormone therapy, surgery and all other treatments related to gender transitions. Last year, the city of Chicago began offering similar coverage.

“The winds were definitely in our favor,” said Christopher Nolan, manager of community benefit and population health and chair of Rush’s LGBTQ health committee. “The director of benefits was working with us and our general counsel is a sponsor, so we had legal in our corner as well. You need a champion to do something like this, and we had lots of support.”

Hospital administrators believe the decision will benefit not only employees, but also the hospital and patients as well, according to Drew Elizabeth McCormick, Rush’s associate general counsel.

Christopher Nolan
Christopher Nolan

“We want to be a desirable place for people to work, and by being more diverse and inclusive, we’re better able to relate to and provide services to all sorts of patients,” she said. “The cost is so minimal and the cultural value of offering these benefits is so high that we felt very comfortable making this decision.”

HRC’s Bailey said that offering these benefits has little effect on overall employee health care costs because the number of transgender people in the workforce in so small.

“By all accounts, this is a rare condition, and everyone’s journey is different,” he said. “Not all transgender people use the medical treatments available to them, so the utilization rate is quite low.”

While employers have been supportive, getting insurance companies to offer coverage to transgender people was an uphill battle, according to Bailey. Today, denying coverage to people who identify as transgender is illegal under federal law.

“Historically, when we look at transgender inclusive health care, the insurance industry has had broad blanket control,” he said. “In some cases, the exclusions were so broadly stated that we would find a transgender woman seeking treatment for migraines having coverage denied because it was deemed related to her transexualism.”

The Affordable Care Act, which was passed in 2010, prohibits insurers and providers from discriminating against patients because of their gender identity.

Currently, 14 states and the District of Columbia have issued similar policies aimed at private insurers, according to Anand Kalra, health program manager at the Transgender Law Center in Oakland, California.

“This is an important time for people in HR to pay attention to these things and to make sure that they have fair and equal treatment when it comes to company health care policies,” he said. “People may not be aware that what’s in their insurance contract is unlawful. It’s important for HR to understand what constitutes discrimination.”

Rita Pyrillis is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on June 14, 2016July 26, 2018

Health Savings Accounts: the New 401(k)

As a society, we’re often in denial about retirement. While most of us envision a future full of leisurely, work-free days, many people have done little to prepare for it. Daily Starbucks runs and racing out to buy the latest iPhone have become second nature; retirement planning has taken a back seat to today’s must-have indulgences.

Life is expensive, and the reality is that most of our daily expenses aren’t going anywhere in retirement. In fact, some of our out-of-pocket costs, namely health care, can go up. According to research by Fidelity Investments, the average couple who retired in 2015 will need $245,000 to cover health care throughout their retirement — up from $220,000 in 2014.

The Fidelity report went on to say that nearly 75 percent of those surveyed were most concerned about being able to afford unexpected health care costs in retirement, yet only 22 percent had actually factored those costs into financial planning. The good news is that it’s never too late to start, and offering a health savings account, or HSA, can be a great way to help employees get on the right track to a healthy financial future.


This article is online bonus content for Workforce’s upcoming July feature on retirement benefits.


Breaking Down the HSA and the FSA

HSAs have traditionally been thought of as spending accounts — often confused with flexible spending accounts, or FSAs — and a way to use pretax dollars to cover everyday health care costs. While that is true, that is only one advantage of an HSA. Designed to be paired with a high-deductible health plan, or HDHP, HSAs allow employees to set aside pretax dollars to cover their deductible, copayments and/or other expenses not covered by insurance.

But HSAs are more than just spending accounts. Here’s where they stand apart: There is no requirement for your employees to use the money they contribute in the current year — or even within the next five years. With no “use it or lose it” policy, the HSA stays with your employees wherever they go, even if they change jobs or health care plans. As long as they have an HSA-qualified health plan and no other impermissible coverage, they can continue to build savings that they can access as needed today, tomorrow and in retirement.

Thinking Beyond the 401(k)

Maybe you’re thinking, “That sounds like a 401(k), and we already offer those.” That’s terrific, and by all means, keep encouraging your employees to contribute to those plans, especially if your company matches contributions. However, with health care costs poised to eat into a big chunk of your employees’ retirement savings, it makes sense to also offer and encourage enrollment in an HSA to help them cover those expenses and protect their retirement income.

For example, in 2016, an employee with family coverage in an HSA-qualified health plan can contribute up to $6,750 to an HSA. Health care expenses are likely to arise during the year, and copayments or big-ticket items may fluctuate based on needs, like braces or new glasses, and the pretax dollars in an HSA can cover that. Because they are pretax, your employees’ money is going to go much further and can save workers an average of 30 percent on health care expenses. Any leftover funds at the end of the year stays in the HSA, accruing interest and growing year over year.

Taking Advantage of Triple Tax

HSA funds also have three distinct tax advantages:

  1. The money that your employees contribute to their HSA goes in tax-free.
  2. Their HSA balance accrues interest and grows tax-free.
  3. Unlike a 401(k), when your employees are ready to use the money, the funds can be withdrawn tax-free as long as they are used for eligible health care expenses.

Similar to a 401(k), your employees also have the option of investing all or a portion of their HSA funds once they reach a minimum account balance. This can help increase their health care nest egg even more. The amount your employees are able to contribute is obviously dictated by their disposable income, but contributing as much as possible is ideal, given the triple tax advantage.

The neat part about socking away money is that, as your employees’ HSA balances start to grow and they better understand the financial power that comes with tax-free savings, the more they’ll likely want to be active participants, seeking opportunities to maximize their savings. If you support your HSA offering with targeted communications and educational resources, you can help empower your employees to take full advantage of their retirement and health care savings.

No matter their age, income or current retirement savings, an HSA can be a great savings option for your employees. Your employees’ physical and financial health is too important not to investigate the advantages of including an HSA in your benefits package. Acting now will help your employees better protect themselves and their families today and in the future.

Jody Dietel is the chief compliance officer at WageWorks Inc. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

 

Posted on June 14, 2016July 26, 2018

‘Concussion,’ Retaliation and Whistleblower Protections

Even if you haven’t seen the 2015 film “Concussion” starring Will Smith, you’ve undoubtedly seen the clip from the trailer of Smith intensely and emotively pointing his finger forward at two doctors and saying “Tell the truth” about concussions.

“Concussion” tells the story of Dr. Bennet Omalu, M.D., a forensic pathologist in Pittsburgh. The doctor discovered the slowly developing brain disease resulting from head injuries among NFL football players. He labeled it CTE, which is short for chronic traumatic encephalopathy.

Omalu also discovered that the NFL and its doctors did not welcome his discovery of this illness. Without giving away a good story, I can say that people discouraged Omalu’s work and attempted to undermine his credibility.

Of course, people can get concussions in various sports and activities and from accidents at home or work. Often, people are able to recover from such injuries. This story concerns recurring head traumas and the effects that show up many years later. Such brain damage has been hard to detect. Many people have not sought treatment and did not recover from CTE. (On March 28, JAMA Neurology published a new study on a biomarker that may help with early detection.)

Intimidation and Retaliation

Omalu’s story can also shed light on the well-known intimidation of and retaliation against whistleblowers in U.S. Veterans Affairs Department hospitals and in other organizations. It is important to keep in mind that when Omalu discovered that repetitive brain traumas produced an effect similar to early onset Alzheimer’s, he was a pathologist for Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. He was not an employee of the NFL.

He was harassed, intimidated and retaliated against, but not by his employer. He was not demoted, transferred or terminated by his employer. He did not suffer from “an adverse personnel action” by his employer.

The Problem

The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 protects whistleblowers from retaliation in the form of an adverse personnel action (or threat of one) by their employers. By the limited definition of retaliation under the act, Omalu was not the subject of retaliation.

Conscientious, responsible managers in environmental and occupational safety and health do want to hear the bad news, so they can take steps to deal with the problems. Conscientious, responsible managers in any business or government activity want to hear about problems so they can deal with them. Patrick Pizzella, former assistant secretary of labor for administration and management at the U.S. Labor Department (now a Member of the Federal Labor Relations Authority) is an example. While I worked on his safety and security planning committee for six years, Pizzella regularly asked: “Does anyone have any questions or comments?” And he acted on what he learned.

On the other hand, some do not want to hear about problems and they do not want anyone else to know about problems. These people sometimes intimidate or retaliate against people who report problems. This is not good for an organization, its employees or its clients/customers. “Don’t Nobody Tell Me No Bad News” is a great song from the musical “The Wiz,” but it is not good policy for those who follow it.

A Look at the VA

The problems at the VA hospitals and retaliation against VA whistleblowers received national publicity. Detailed allegations of many problems at VA were detailed in a 40-page document by the American Federation of Government Employees Local 17 in July 2015 with little visibility. In December 2015, Government Executive magazine reported that management at the VA would take no action on the problems alleged in the report.

Unlike the case of Omalu, the whistleblowers at the VA were employees. However, with a few possible exceptions, retaliation against complainers and whistleblowers did not involve demotion, transfer or termination. So the harassment and torment of the whistleblowers was not covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act. For example, purposeful public humiliation is psychological violence but, by itself, it is not retaliation under the act. (It is workplace violence.)

The brilliant Omalu is an exceptional man. Still, even he needed support from his faith community in Pittsburgh to get through the hassle of telling the truth about the NFL players’ injuries. Is it reasonable to expect the same courage and mental toughness from the average workers who desire to point out the problems they see?

This suggests to me that we do not have adequate tools to deal with those who intimidate and harass people who point out problems in the workplace.

Edward Stern served the U.S. Labor Department for 40 years as a senior economist and policy program analyst. He also has worked extensively with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and is an expert on workplace bullying. To comment, email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on June 13, 2016July 24, 2024

HR Credentials: Evaluating Their Value

As the digital enterprise takes shape and the demand for talent grows, it’s increasingly clear that skills and knowledge are precious commodities. The ability to understand an increasingly complex business environment — and world — is nothing less than critical.

Within the human resources field, this has translated into a greater emphasis on certifications and graduate degrees. Today, it’s a widely accepted belief that obtaining advanced skills and knowledge positions a person and enterprise for greater success. HR certifications have a long history in this field, but some experts argue that an advanced degree is still preferable.

“A bachelor’s degree is a starting point for human resources. An advanced degree provides a huge foundation for knowledge and skills,” said Tamar Elkeles, who has a Ph.D. and is chief people officer at Quixey, a Mountain View, California-based software firm. “Most learning does not occur in a classroom within a few hours. It takes place on the job over longer periods of time.”

She said she typically ignores certifications when making hiring and other HR decisions. “Certifications, other than perhaps in the benefits and compensation field, have nothing to do with real-world business skills. For 20 years, we’ve been hearing about how HR has to become more business-focused, and it still hasn’t happened.”

Herman Aguinis, a management professor at the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University, added, “It’s no secret that there is a strong desire to elevate the status of HR and that credentials and degrees add value.” Yet, it’s also clear that “a lot of time and money goes into obtaining all of these certifications and degrees,” which can range from a few hundred dollars and a few classroom hours to tens of thousands of dollars and a couple of years at a university. Unfortunately, their actual value isn’t always measurable — for both the individual and the business, he said.

Things certainly haven’t gotten any simpler over the past few years. After the HR Certification Institute and Society for Human Resource Management parted ways in an acrimonious breakup in May 2014, SHRM began offering its own credentials. Today, HRCI offers seven credentials, including the Professional in Human Resources and the Senior Professional in Human Resources, and SHRM offers two: the SHRM Certified Professional for those in the early stages of their careers and the SHRM Senior Certified Professional for practitioners with at least six years of experience.

There’s a growing focus on HR practitioners obtaining certifications and degrees. But measuring their value remains elusive.


A Matter of Values?

Amid a dearth of data about the value of HR certifications for organizations, a March 2016 report from the HR Certification Institute and the Top Employers Institute, “Emerging Evidence: Business Performance and the Validation of HR Best Practices,” offers some insight into the value of certifications. Among other things, it noted that companies that place a premium on HR certifications outperformed the stock indexes in their respective countries by an average of 51 percent over the same five-year period and outperformed the industry average by 14 percent over the same period.

In addition, stock prices of companies with more than five HRCI-certified professionals increased an average of 95 percent between 2011 and 2015, while the relevant stock indexes increased an average of 38 percent over the same five-year period. Meanwhile, companies with more than five practitioners holding HRCI certificates outperformed relevant stock indexes by 57 percent over the five-year period.

On an individual level, the study found that the average rating for Top Employers’ certified companies on German job site Kununu is 3.5 stars (out of 5) vs. the overall Kununu average of 3.1. The average rating for Top Employers’ certified companies rated on Glassdoor is 3.5 stars (out of 5) compared with the overall Glassdoor average of 3.2.

According to Top Employers Institute CEO David Plink, the findings deliver a “clear message that exceptional human resource management — from applying HR best practices to the competencies of the HR professionals who design and implement them — can demonstrably and positively contribute to the bottom line.”

—Samuel Greengard


And in April, the HR Open Standards Consortium Inc., a 17-year-old nonprofit based in Windermere, Florida, announced a new certification program for HR tech professionals.

Amid all the upheaval and the resulting confusion about what career and hiring decisions to make, there’s a need for HR professionals to face some tough choices. Peter Cappelli, a management professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, said that in today’s business and HR environment, it’s vital to understand how, when and where credentials and degrees matter. “It certainly complicates things for HR people,” he said.

Paper Chase

Most HR executives believe certifications are a good thing — particularly early in a career. And there’s some evidence to support it. A 2015 HRCI-HumRRO study of about 12,000 practitioners holding certifications found that those with SPHR credentials earned $19,712 more annually than their peers while individuals holding a PHR pulled down $4,547 more than those without any certification. In addition, the report noted that 90 percent of people with PHRs and 87 percent of those with SPHRs were employed full time in an HR position compared with 69 percent of their noncertified peers. Finally, the report found that certified HR professionals reported greater income growth over time and higher career satisfaction.

While these results sound impressive, it’s unclear whether other factors and variables enter into the equation, such as whether those who pursue advanced learning and certifications are intrinsically more driven and productive. “Certifications definitely hold some weight. I would select a person with a certification vs. somebody who doesn’t have it,” said Deborah Gutman, human resources manager at Sierra Nevada Brewing Co. She holds an SPHR, SHRM-SCP and a master’s degree in HR management. “Basically, it means you have gone through a process and you have taken steps to gain a foundation of knowledge that is applicable to the field. It adds a level of credibility.”

Lupe Mujica, chief people officer at First Service Residential, a Dania Beach, Florida-based property management services firm, also said she believes certifications have value. “They provide an excellent foundation for HR,” said Mujica, who holds a bachelor’s degree in organizational development and is a longtime member of SHRM and the National Human Resources Association. “For someone who is at an entry level or new to HR — basically, someone who has little or no experience, it shows a certain level of proficiency.”

In addition, “there is a tangible benefit for the business,” mostly revolving around the individual understanding HR concepts and basic tasks and managing work more effectively, she said. Like others, Mujica said work experience and graduate degrees — particularly in areas such as business, psychology and information technology — are far more important for individuals as they work their way up the corporate ladder.

Of course, there’s also the issue of which organization to choose: HRCI or SHRM. While HR executives may have preferences — Mujica likes SHRM because of its global presence, and Gutman said HRCI holds a great deal of credibility — one of the problems is that there’s no exact way to compare the two certifications. “One of the challenges is that the SHRM certification is relatively new, and it appears they are trying to make the process very inviting in order to attract people,” Gutman said.

She points to the fact that SHRM’s pass rate is about 68 percent for its SHRM-CP program and 56 percent for its SHRM-SCP, compared with 53 percent for HRCI as a whole. Whether HRCI’s lower pass rate is a result of more rigorous standards or that it attracts a different group of people is debatable.

Not surprisingly, each organization believes its approach has advantages and that it is better aligned with the needs of today’s HR practitioner. “The primary difference,” said Linda Anguish, director of certification products for HRCI, “is that we are an independent certifying body with a core competency in the HR field. We have been doing this for 40 years and we have an accreditation from a third-party certifying agency.”

In addition, HRCI does not require a practitioner to take any particular program or learning track in college prior to taking a certification exam. Anguish holds SPHR and Global Professional in Human Resources certifications.

On the other hand, SHRM has adopted a competency-based model that more closely supports the way businesses and various organizations operate from an HR perspective, said Alexander Alonso, SHRM senior vice president of knowledge development, who holds a Ph.D. and a SHRM-SCP certification.

The 285,000-member organization relies on the SHRM Body of Competency and Knowledge, also known as the SHRM BoCK, as the foundation for these certifications, which center on eight key behavioral skills and 15 HR functional areas that it deems critical to the success of any HR professional. As a result, Alonso said, SHRM is equipped to address core skill requirements represented in Fortune 100 organizations and beyond.

About 12 percent of HR professionals in the U.S. hold a certification. HRCI boasts about 145,000 current certifications and SHRM boasts about 92,000. According to Cappelli, a certification delivers niche benefits while a “master’s degree and experience dominate any credentials.” Moreover, he said certifications serve partly to “compartmentalize” the profession and create “subfields.”

“In general, employers want to think of HR people more as ‘managers’ and ‘executives’ rather than ‘professionals,’ which is where credentials point them,” he said.

On top of all this, the HR Open Standards Consortium recently launched its training initiative geared toward HR tech professionals. “The HR Open Standards’ Individual Certificate provides an inaugural opportunity for HR Technology professionals to be recognized for their proficiency in and experience with HR-XML and HR-JSON data exchange standards,” said Suneel Mendiratta, president of the consortium’s board of directors, in a news release. Certificates are currently being offered in assessments, recruiting and screening with other tech certificates in the works for areas such as recruiting, benefits and performance management, according to the organization.

On the Money?

One of the problems with the current environment, Indiana University’s Aguinis said, is that while the goal of making HR practitioners more proficient is a good one, and any programs and activities that elevate the field are a positive, there’s never been any objective research conducted about certification programs and what precise value they provide for various stakeholders. This would require access to databases — something he said he hasn’t been able to obtain. Meanwhile, students and others collectively fork over millions of dollars for certifications. “Nobody knows if practitioners get hired faster, promoted faster or make more money than their counterparts,” he said.

HRCI’s SPHR exam, for example, costs $495 plus a $100 application fee and is good for three years. SHRM charges $300 for members to take the SHRM-CP or SHRM-SCP exam and $400 for nonmembers, and the certification is also good for three years.

Aguinis describes the situation as nothing less than a “conflict of interest.” He believes that greater transparency is essential. He would like to see research teams composed of both practitioners and researchers; conflict of interest disclosures that indicate whether these organizations paid a consulting firm or individual researcher to study a certification program; any findings from studies undergo a peer-review process; and data that are open to other researchers so that they can analyze and validate it.

“Now that SHRM and HRCI have split,” he said, “the situation is even more confusing. There are more choices and the question arises: ‘Do I need to be certified by both organizations?’ ”

Among other things, Aguinis would like to know whether job candidates with credentials are hired faster than others, and whether an HR certification equates to better job performance and value for the company. Quixey’s Elkeles agrees that there’s a dearth of impartial data about the value of certifications — and without a standards body in place, results are somewhat vague and relative. What’s more, she said she’s concerned about the quality of individual instructors and how well curriculum matches the skill sets required for a person to make the leap to an HR executive.

“These programs are huge moneymakers, and it’s in the best interest of these organizations to promote the concept that certifications are beneficial for practitioners and organizations,” Elkeles said. “The question is: Does the amount of time and money spent deliver a real-world return on investment?”

Whatever HR practitioners can do to advance their skills and knowledge is generally a good thing, HRCI’s Anguish said. In the end, “the most important thing is to make a commitment to personal development and the profession,” she said.

Editor’s note: This story was updated on June 15, 2016, after SHRM contacted us with the current number of people with SHRM certifications.

Samuel Greengard is a writer based in Portland, Oregon. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on June 13, 2016June 29, 2023

8 Remote Meeting Tools That Aren’t a Waste of Time

WF_WebSite_BlogHeaders-14

While you might see PowerPoint presentations, conference tables and paper agendas as the only way to set up a meeting, I see it as a bad choice.

As a remote worker for most of my life, the least efficient meetings have been the ones I’ve participated in while seated around a table. They’re mostly bantering about sport with a vague pep talk at the end — something about “going out there and making more sales.”

The most productive meetings I’ve ever been a part of have been remote — using video chat software, cloud-based documents and file storage resources. We work better in our own comfortable environment with access to the right tools, so if you’re managing a remote team or thinking about putting an end to physical meetings, here’s what’s worked for me.

Tools for Taking Better Meeting Notes

Let’s put a stop to scribbling, photocopying and overwhelming our desks with printouts. Thanks to tools like WorkFlowy, Dropbox Paper and minutes.io, those tasks are now obsolete.

WorkFlowy

WorkFlowy lets you create sharable bullet-point lists with tags and search, which is perfect for taking and organizing meeting notes. The way I use it is to keep a list called “meetings,” with sublists of dates that have the notes inside. By tagging the action items, I can quickly search the tag and bring up everything I have to do after the meeting.

Dropbox Paper

Dropbox Paper offers real-time collaboration over cloud-based documents. You can insert code snippets, images, comments and suggestions. For meetings focused on a particular project’s progress, getting your team to draft their ideas and put their resources inside a Dropbox Paper document can be an easy way to get a quick overview and add comments to each section.

Minutes.io

Minutes.io is lightning-fast note-taking software, specifically engineered for taking meeting notes. It features hot keys and automatic emailing to all meeting members, meaning that after the meeting is finished, the person taking the minutes can send it to everyone in the group in one click.

Tools for High-Quality Video Calls

Skype isn’t the only option for video calls. There are plenty of other players in the space.

Screenhero

Screenhero lives inside Slack and offers high-resolution voice, video and screen-sharing. It’s great for when you’re demonstrating your work on your computer without having to have  someone look over your shoulder. However, since it’s acquisition by Slack, you can’t get it as a standalone app.

Appear.in

Appear.in is a video chat service that gives you a permanent room locked to a URL. Members can come and go as they please, but the room remains fixed, making it more efficient than Skype because calls don’t have to be stopped and started. With appear.in, the room is running at all times so the only requirement after setting it up is turning up.

Tools for Storing Meeting Resources

During the employee onboarding process, it’s ideal if you add employees to a platform containing the assets they’re going to need in the future. This could be slides and notes from previous meetings, style guides or to-do lists. Here are some tools we’ve had success using:

Trello

Trello cards are ideal for storing your meeting resources in one place. Make a card for the meeting date, then add in the recording, the notes, slides and anything else you need. Once the meeting notes are attached to cards, you can link the cards to other projects on the relevant boards, centralizing your resources.

Basecamp

Like Trello, Basecamp is a project management tool. That doesn’t mean you can’t . The difference is that you don’t work inside cards, but inside projects. You could set it up so there is a one project for all meetings, and then attach notes and files in there. You can also chat with your team using Campfire — a chat service from the same company.

Google Drive

The advantage of using Google Drive as the go-to place for meeting resources is that it can link directly to your desktop’s file structure. One member can have the notes from their computer saved inside their Drive folder on the desktop, and that automatically syncs to every member. In my opinion, Google Drive is the ideal solution here because it doesn’t stop you from using project management software with it — both Trello and Basecamp can be integrated with Google Drive.

Getting Your Team to Adopt a New Tool

The choice of remote meeting tools can be overwhelming, but there are plenty of options out there. Explore for yourself. Until next time — meeting adjourned.

Benjamin Brandall is the head of content marketing at Process Street, a software as a service company based in California. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

The Career Hackers is a new blog devoted to helping people start their careers and achieve their goals.

 

Posted on May 26, 2016June 29, 2023

Internet of Things: The Next Talent Management Thing?

Internet of Things

The internet of things is going to change the way you manage your workforce — and the revolution has already begun.

IoT involves connecting people, sensors, machines and devices over a single network to automatically transfer data without manual interference. It is often thought of as an efficiency tool used in manufacturing and logistics environments to track equipment performance and monitor the supply chain. But it can be just as beneficial in managing people, said Kevin Cornelius mobility services leader at EY. “It can help the HR function adopt smarter systems to drive operations and innovate the way they deliver training, learning and people development.”

Wellness Initiatives and IoT

Companies that adopt wearables for wellness initiatives are already participating in IoT for workforce management. When HR gives employees sensor-driven devices to track the number of steps they take, their heart rate or other health data, they are harnessing the power of IoT to reduce health care costs and improve productivity, said Debbie Krupitzer, the IoT practice lead for consulting and technology company Capgemini. “By implementing a program whereby employees wear activity trackers and are rewarded for their activity and movements, HR executives not only promote and incentivize healthy lifestyles among employees, but also can leverage the program to negotiate prices with their health care insurers to reduce premiums.”

It is a gateway use of IoT for HR, but there are many other potential applications. IoT connectivity could be used to track the productivity of workers in the field, to assign tasks based on the nearest expert or service rep to a job, to improve site scheduling based on customer flow, and to push out real-time training based on an employees’ time or performance on a task. Activity trackers can also provide HR professionals with a new way to promote training and educational experiences among employees, Krupitzer said. “If an employee is working on a particular machine for the first time, the worker could get an alert with a tutorial on how to use the equipment and perform the task most effectively.”

Companies can also harness IoT to capture a real-time picture of where their people are and where they are needed and to support a more flexible workforce management approach, Cornelius said. “Any business with a footprint in more than one place will need to innovate their mobility strategies and approaches, not only to drive efficiencies but also to help create tomorrow’s leaders,” he said.

Don’t Be Creepy

That doesn’t mean HR leaders should attach sensors to all of their workers and start tracking their every move. First of all, there is a fine line between performance enhancement and stalking, Krupitzer said. But more importantly, you need a business case for using IoT that aligns with specific business goals if you want it to be effective. As with all technology-driven initiatives, having a purpose and clear metrics will improve your outcomes and make it possible to demonstrate the value of these technologies to the business.

Once you have your business case, then you can think about the technology. It may be as simple as buying Fitbits to support wellness goals or using GPS apps to track workers, or it may require the help of an IoT consultant to establish a network of custom-coded sensors to capture more specific data.

HR leaders interested in testing IoT concepts should also consider what information they already have access to from employees’ connected devices, suggested David Ludlow, group vice president of solutions management for SAP. “That data can help you understand who your workforce is, what they are doing, and what they need,” he said. “A lot of that data is already being collected, the question now is what are you going to do with it to improve the workforce process.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on March 14, 2016July 24, 2018

They Call Me James … and Jim, Jimmy and Sometimes Jimbo

To take a page out of Eminem’s lyric book, my name is what? My name is who?

No, my name is James, and you can call me … James.

Based on the response I got from a rare Facebook rant I made over the weekend, I get the feeling this is something many of you deal with on a daily basis: people creating nicknames for you without asking.

I understand why people go with nicknames first. They think it adds that personal charm, that “Oh, we’re buddy-buddy” sort of feel, but some people can be touchy about what people call them. And you can include me on that list.

It’s quite common for me to get an email from someone I don’t know with the friendly opening of, “Hey, Jim, I’d like to talk to you about this or that” or the quick closing of “Thanks, Jim, for thinking of us.”

You might think it sounds pompous for me to say this, but my name is James. It’s not Jim, Jimbo or Jimmy. James is what’s on my birth certificate, and it’s what people have called me — outside of close family members — since the third grade. Big revelation here: My parents preferred the nickname Jamie, so I was Jamie until the third grade, and they and some other family members sometimes still call me that. Bigger revelation here: There are some family members on my wife’s side who do call me Jimbo on occasion. There’s a story behind it that makes it more endearing, but I won’t get into that here.

But as for James, in the third grade my teacher asked me what I wanted to be called. No one had ever asked me before. Everyone had always called me Jamie. To be able to choose what people called me? It was an empowering moment I’ll never forget.

I didn’t know the word at the time, but I gravitated toward the euphonious “S” in James. It just felt and sounded right to my ear.

At that instance, my mind raced like Ralphie’s inner voice in “A Christmas Story.”

“Should I go with what people know and say, Jamie?” I thought. “No, this is my chance to be heard, to be who I really want to be.”

I was finally going to get my way, which is something I had discussed in my head for gosh knows how long. “I go by James,” I said. There, I’d said it. After all those years of acting as this Jamie person, I finally had gotten the opportunity to choose what people would call me.

It was liberating.

It was great.

It was name-tastic.

Since then, I’ve always gone by James. Yes, there have been nicknames along the way, such as Generic T. Long story, but my twin brother had worn a shirt with his then-seventh grade nickname to school one day, so one of the basketball coaches decided I was now to be known as Generic T. It stuck for a couple of years.

Then someone in college called me Double T for reasons I still don’t understand. And a few people along the way have called me James with the Spanish pronunciation.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have problems with nicknames, but, especially in the business setting, I don’t think people should randomly brand people with a nickname. We shouldn’t assume Susan wants to be called Sue, Douglas wants to be called Doug or Margaret prefers Peggy. And a John McKenzie shouldn’t be called “Johnny Mac” without his consent. Names are personal. Names are a big part of who we are.

When I contact someone I don’t know, especially via email, I use the name I find on a company website or social media outlet. If I’m still not sure what name to use, I use the last name with a courtesy title. Of course, I’d say, “Here’s to you, Ms. Robinson” instead of “Mrs. Robinson.” Hey, hey, hey.

And I certainly don’t think managers should create nicknames for personnel who report to them. Well-intentioned or not, unrequested nicknames can come off as condescending.

So what’s my name? It’s James. If you call me Jim, I might cringe, but I’ll get over it quickly. But if you really feel the need to call me a nickname instead of James, I guess I’d prefer Jamie. It’s grown on me a little over the years, but just a little.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress