Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Janet Wiscombe

Posted on February 2, 2007June 29, 2023

IDEO: The Innovation Factory

IDEO began as a place where fun-loving, brainy engineers invented products ranging from stand-up toothpaste tubes to high-tech blood analyzers. But in the past 15 years, the Palo Alto, California, company has morphed into an innovation factory where the corporate elite from places like Procter & Gamble, Kaiser Permanente and mMode at AT&T Wireless Services flock to participate in projects and brainstorming sessions with IDEO designers, engineers and social scientists. The company ranked No. 15 on Boston Consulting Group’s 2006 list of the 25 most innovative companies in the world.

Here, on a small campus down the street from Stanford University, is the company that has been variously described as wildly creative and collaborative, contagiously dynamic, open and intense, iconoclastic and slightly zany, flexible and flat as a pancake—the world’s top honchos come to learn how to fundamentally rewire their companies for innovation, from product design to developing a creative mind-set throughout an organization.

technology and talent
Tech and talent drive IDEO.

With about $80 million in sales and 450 employees, the firm may seem like small potatoes. But it has grown at a consistent rate of 20 percent per year for the past five years, and its global influence is huge. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January 2006, IDEO chief executive Tim Brown played a starring role in helping top execs rethink their approach to problem-solving and to developing creative environments.

At a time when creativity and innovation are the driving forces of the new economy, as well as the old one, senior managers throughout organizations turn to IDEO to learn how to foster creativity by developing cultures that are founded on breaking rules, building teamwork and stimulating the free expression of ideas. IDEO general manager Tom Kelley, author of the book The Ten Faces of Innovation, talks about managing people inside a veritable innovation factory:

Workforce Management: How specifically do you at IDEO find employees with the skills needed today to help create new workplace cultures to support innovation?

Tom Kelley: Several years ago, I had responsibility for HR at IDEO, and was always conscious that our ability to continuously recruit new talent was crucial to the ongoing success of the firm. We tend to think of the recruiting journey as having two separable components—attraction and selection.

Attraction: Nobel laureate Linus Pauling once said that the way to get a good idea is start with a lot of ideas, and of course the same applies to getting good people. After IDEO got named as one of the best small companies to work for in America [by Inc. magazine], word seemed to get out, and attraction has never been an issue since.

So I’d say our experience at IDEO suggests that the attraction component goes well beyond the traditional scope of an HR role, and is broadly influenced by the company’s overall reputation, its brand and its relationship to the surrounding community.

Selection: When I joined the firm, selection was much simpler than it is today, because back then we were searching mainly for product designers who combined a humanistic orientation with a technical background. My brother David [founder of IDEO] was teaching in a two-year master’s program on product design at Stanford University that was graduating small groups of bright, creative “renaissance” engineers who we found to be perfectly suited to do innovative work.

Having seen their project work for two years, my brother knew those students very well, and when they started applying to our firm, he had more data available than can be ever be gleaned from the traditional recruitment interview. In fact, I’m not sure there were any sessions with prospective employees in that first decade of the firm that would be recognizable as job interviews, because my brother hired people he already knew pretty well—myself very much included.

Selection today is a bit more complex, partly because of the diversity of talent we are looking for, but we remain acutely aware of the limitations of a 60-minute hiring interview. We try to compensate for the relatively low-bandwidth communication of a traditional interview by doing lots of interviews before making a hiring decision—often using groups of IDEO people talking to a candidate in the same session—so that typically a dozen people may have talked to them before we make an offer.

That way, we triangulate on whether they will be a good fit at IDEO, and the IDEO team has a sense that they were broadly consulted on who will be joining their team.

WM: How does the strategy for innovation work at IDEO?

Kelley: IDEO has been practicing innovation throughout its history. Some of the key ingredients in that recipe for innovation are:

  1. A human-centered approach that ties innovation to customers’ underlying needs—even the psychological or emotional needs that are not immediately apparent and that customers themselves may not articulate.
  2. A belief in the value of quick prototyping, the kind of experimentation that usually has relevant learning attached.
  3. Heavy use of brainstorming as an engine for idea generation and a way to tap into the collective knowledge of the organization.

  WM: Please describe the culture at IDEO.

    Kelley: The culture is very deep at IDEO, and very nuanced. I’ll highlight a few characteristics:

  1. An intense intellectual curiosity. From the moment I joined the firm almost 20 years ago to the present day, I have always enjoyed the voracious appetite for new information and new ideas at IDEO. Stanford professor Bob Sutton, who studied IDEO quite extensively several years ago, described it as “an attitude of wisdom,” a healthy balance between knowing things and distrusting what you know that encourages continued curiosity.
  2. An abundance mentality. Since demand for IDEO’s services has exceeded our supply during much of the firm’s history, there is a healthy interest in doing the right projects, as opposed to doing whatever comes along. So both at an individual level and for the firm as a whole, we are looking for innovation programs that offer a good “fit” with our interests and capabilities. I believe that abundance mentality also results in a people who are generous in sharing ideas with other team members.
  3. An inherent restlessness. The culture does not tend to “leave well enough alone.” If you deeply believe that anything can be made better, then you tend to tinker with things a lot. So at IDEO, we are constantly tinkering with our methodologies, our offerings, our structure and even our workplace. I am sure a good accountant would tell us that we should keep every new office configuration, every new piece of furniture or equipment until it is fully depreciated, but that doesn’t tend to happen at IDEO.
  4. A vitality that manifests itself in the group being relatively fit. From the ongoing “boot camp” fitness programs to the 24-hour bike ride competitions to the pre-work surfing groups, the average IDEO person is pretty active.

    WM: What can HR executives learn from IDEO?

    Kelley: In my book, I tried to capture the key elements of IDEO’s approach to innovation. I could have chosen to focus on creative tools or techniques, but instead created a framework around the people of innovation.

    One intent of the book is to help teams and individuals go beyond doing innovation and start being the innovators. I believe this people-based strategy relates directly to human resources throughout an organization. There’s not a role called “the human resources manager,” but in a way, the whole book is about HR.

    WM: What does HR in the areas of hiring, retention, leadership and cultural development and training mean at IDEO?

    Kelley: Our founder may have been an engineer, but the founding principles of the firm were all about HR. Back in 1978, when hatching the firm that became IDEO, my brother told me two of the defining characteristics for the new enterprise: First, he said, he mainly just wanted a place where you could work with your friends. Second, he wanted a place where no one had a boss’ boss.

    The “work with your friends” rule is still in full swing, in a firm with more than its share of parties, and a very active social life. One telling indicator of how well people get along is that when IDEO has leadership meetings, bringing in managers from around the world to the San Francisco Bay Area, we routinely host them overnight in our homes. I have had several guests at my house over the years from IDEO’s locations like Chicago, Boston, London and Munich.

    An acquaintance of mine who works for the federal government finds this arrangement “creepy,” but it seems perfectly natural because of the natural friendships within the firm, and of course it is purely voluntary on both sides. If we didn’t enjoy doing it, we would have stopped long ago.

    And when we did our first-ever firm-wide meeting of all 350 people a few years back, we hosted more than 100 visitors in the homes of Bay Area people [no one stayed in a hotel those nights]. It was great fun, and a memorable event in the history of the firm.

    The “boss’ boss” rule is maintained today as the minimization of hierarchy. In an idea-friendly environment, you want to minimize the amount of corporate posturing associated with trying to guess what answer the boss is hoping for. I am not saying that IDEO people lack respect for authority, exactly; just that they are prone to speak their mind, regardless of whether there’s a “boss” in the room.

    WM: What companies have best implemented IDEO’s innovative strategies?

    Kelley: I am not sure that I would characterize them as having implemented our strategies per se, but there are dozens of client companies where I think we have helped add fuel to their engine of innovation. Procter & Gamble under CEO A.G. Lafley has strengthened their culture, quickened their pace of product development and doubled their stock price in recent years.

    PepsiCo under Steve Reinemund [who announced his retirement as CEO in August 2006] diversified their portfolio way beyond carbonated soft drinks and created a bundle of new better-for-you products that enabled the market capitalization of PepsiCo to pass the market cap of Coke for the first time [in December 2005].

    Among smaller organizations, Phil Newbold at Memorial Hospital and Health System [in South Bend, Indiana] has nurtured a culture of innovation at his hospital.

    WM: What specific “how to” steps did you use at IDEO for fostering creativity when the company was founded? How have you sustained innovation over the years?

    Kelley: Since my brother never wrote anything down—though I did much later, of course—most of those steps were implicitly leading by example, rather than having explicit policies or procedures. Smart team members are really quick to read an organizational culture and figure out what kinds of behaviors are encouraged versus those that are frowned upon.

    For example, it was clear from the beginning that good-natured humor—even poking fun at the boss—was a part of the culture, but that ridiculing people for a “stupid” idea was not. And the absence of hierarchy I mentioned earlier was a part of it too. From the very beginning, IDEO was an idea-friendly environment.

    WM: At IDEO, how specifically do you identify the types of people who keep an organization creative?

    Kelley: In my book, I’ve identified 10 specific roles people have available to them, and all a manager has to do is give team members an opportunity to explore their aptitude for those roles. So, for example, if you think that someone on your team is very bright and has latent or underdeveloped talents for teaching others, simply give them a chance.

    Next time they are going to an interesting conference or taking an international trip, maybe to visit one of your other offices, ask them to share the most interesting things they learned in an informal follow-up lunch session with their colleagues.

    Basically, you’re setting up an advanced form of the show-and-tell we all did in kindergarten. But doing so has three potential benefits. First, the person will pay closer attention when they are out of the office. They will learn more themselves, because they know they will be sharing the insights later.
Second, if they are any good at the sharing process, the rest of the team who stayed at the office will get some new insights during lunch.

    Third, and most important, you will get a sense of whether you were right, whether this person who you know to be bright is also good at transferring their knowledge to others.

    So you have created a little experiment, and if it is successful you have identified a “cross-pollinator” for your innovation team.

    If it fails, as many experiments do, then you can always try a new experiment with a different team member or nurture one of the other “faces of innovation.”

    WM: How does your own company strategy improve the bottom line and give you an advantage over your competition?

    Kelley: We tend to spend more time worrying about our clients’ bottom line than our own. But having said that, I am sure our CFO would tell you that IDEO has had pretty solid performance in the past couple of decades and is a healthy firm today. You may have seen the annual Boston Consulting Group/Wharton survey results on the world’s most innovative companies. Every company on that list gains value from the innovation momentum they have built up within their organizations.

    That innovation premium shows up in the stock price of the publicly traded companies, in their top-line growth and in their profit margins. In the long run, one of the biggest benefits of such innovation momentum may be in attracting bright, creative people who want to keep the innovations rolling along.

Posted on January 8, 2007July 10, 2018

Whats Behind the Wheel at Toyota

Former Secretary of Transportation Federico Peña says it should come as no surprise that Toyota Motor Corp.’s diversity program in North America—like its exploding profits—is a reflection of two bedrock philosophies: respect for people and haizan, Japanese for continuous improvement.


    Peña, a managing director in Denver at the investment firm Vestar Capital Partners, is a veteran member of Toyota’s Diversity Advisory Board, which advises company executives and serves as a watchdog for the company’s 35,000 U.S. employees.


    In the past five years, Toyota has far exceeded its targets and has increased its spending to a $1.2 billion annual commitment to diversity, he says. It focuses on key areas such as implementing philanthropy, job training, hiring and increasing the number of minority and ethnic dealers and suppliers.


    “Toyota made it into the Billion Dollar Roundtable, which is very prestigious,” he says. “It has built diversity into the whole company. It isn’t just a program. The entire culture supports it.”


    The Diversity Advisory Board, thought to be the only such group in the industry, was established in 2001. That’s when Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing North America Inc. developed a 10-year, $7.8 billion diversity strategy for minority-oriented business and philanthropy after a threatened boycott by the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who deemed a Toyota TV ad offensive to blacks.


    The seven board members are experts in the fields of diversity, public policy and economic development and include former Secretary of Labor Alexis Herman and former U.S. Reps. Jack Kemp and Susan Molinari.


    They meet four times a year and talk on the phone more frequently, Peña says, providing an outside perspective, helping to set a diversity strategy and working closely with management. The program was intended to go beyond a focus on compliance to help launch careers and fill the automotive dealership pipeline with diverse talent.


    A key diversity and inclusion initiative is Toyota’s Business Partners Groups, employees who collectively advance company interests and support employee development. One, the Diversity Champions program, charges outstanding employees with working at the grass-roots level to develop diversity and inclusion programs.


    Other business partners are TORQUE-Women’s Development and Empowerment, and TAASiA (Toyota Asian American Society in Alliance)—both of which were established in 2006—and older groups such as GALA (Gay and Lesbian [Bisexual Transgender & Friends] Alliance), the AAC (African American Collaborative) and TODOS (Toyota Organization for the Development of Latinos).


    “People don’t come to complain,” says Jennifer “Jae” Requiro, manager of the diversity consulting and inclusion strategies department. “And they don’t bring up issues without looking for solutions.”


    Toyota is the recipient of several honors, including the National Minority Supplier Development Council’s Corporation of the Year.


    Last spring, however, the top Toyota executive in the U.S., Hideaki Otaka, left his position after he was accused of sexual harassment by his former assistant. An undisclosed settlement was reached. In response, the company formed a special task force, led by diversity advisory board member Herman, to review the company’s harassment and discrimination policies.


    A company spokeswoman says the lawsuit resulted in “immediate actions to enhance training for (company) executives” and plans to strengthen and clarify its procedures for responding to allegations.


    “As a supplement to existing training, all executives of our North American affiliates are now required to undergo a special training program to enable them to better recognize, prevent and handle any instances of inappropriate behavior,” Toyota spokesman Steven Curtis says.


    In addition, Curtis says the policy requires that any allegation of harassment or misconduct be immediately investigated and reported to the executive’s superior—and each affiliate has now clarified its procedures to provide that if the chairman, CEO or president is involved, a report will be made directly to that executive’s board of directors.


    Peña points out that the issue of diversity is only increasing in importance. “The number of minorities—especially Hispanics and Asians—is exploding,” he says. “Today one-third of the population in the U.S. is minority. By 2050 about half the population will be ethnic minorities.”


    The company is paying careful attention to changing demographics and to driving diversity, he says. “It’s the Toyota Way. When they commit themselves to something, they do it.”


    That’s why it isn’t surprising that the company is on track to post record profits this year, Peña observes. In November, Toyota reported a 34 percent increase in its fiscal second-quarter profit and raised its full-year earnings forecast to more than $13 billion.

Posted on January 8, 2007July 10, 2018

Toyota Driving Diversity

Brent Loescher, a self-confident white male of 39, hardly looks like a poster child for diversity.

    At Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., his job title is operations design manager. But he also carries a badge that identifies him as a “diversity champion,” one of 138 out of Toyota Motor Sales’6,272 employees who serve as leaders at the grass-roots level to promote diversity and inclusion internally and at regional sales and distributor offices throughout the country.


    “The program is about developing strong work relationships, learning more about who you work with, their mind-set and experiences,” Loescher says.


    He began working at Toyota in New Jersey in 2001, and was deployed by the Army to serve a 14-month tour in Baghdad, working directly with Iraqis. Now a retired master sergeant, he says the military provided a “fantastic” background in diversity education, but that the training he received at Toyota has been singularly powerful.


    “It makes you explore yourself,” he says. “It’s the most mentally challenging and spiritually enriching experience I’ve ever had.”


    The champion program, which began forming in the late 1990s at Toyota Motor Sales’ headquarters in Torrance, California, is part of the auto giant’s $1.2 billion annual commitment to diversity. It operates separately from human resources and is run by a five-person “diversity consulting and inclusion strategies” unit. It works collaboratively with the University of Toyota and outside consultants to develop the training program, says Jennifer “Jae” Requiro, department manager.


    It works like this: Candidates who’ve proved themselves as outstanding employees with leadership skills are nominated and selected by managers and co-workers. Groups of 10 to 12 champions at a time begin their training at an intensive three-day seminar at company headquarters.


    A champion might be a sales manager in Massachusetts, a logistic services employee in Kentucky or an attorney in California.


    After the first three days of training, champions go back to their units for three to four weeks. They then return to the university for two more days of training.


    They are responsible for analyzing their workplace and developing action plans by asking questions such as: What’s going well in this unit? How much are people involved and engaged? Is there enough understanding and communication? Do employees generate and exchange ideas? How well do they know one another?


    Champions also meet with Requiro and other managers informally once every two months to discuss subjects ranging from new communication tools to best practices. They gather at headquarters once a year for a formal summit, and are required to submit a written report of the research they have conducted on their work cultures.


    If, for example, a champion reports back that there was an expressed need for career development, the diversity and inclusion unit works with HR, which might implement programs such as job shadowing, helping to create more teams or organizing informational interviews with managers.


    Since no two champions work with similar groups of employees and they often tackle very different cultural issues, Requiro says that the plans they initiate are highly customized. She estimates that champions devote from 5 percent to 15 percent of their time to the program.


    She points out that diversity champions are the cream of the crop and that the program has not only noticeably strengthened company culture, it has proved to be invaluable for employee development and leadership training.


    Like an increasing number of companies, the Japanese car manufacturer has a very broad definition of diversity and uses the word “inclusion” to place emphasis on commonality rather than difference.


    Requiro stresses that the program isn’t affirmative action. “It’s about how we react to change,” she says. “We have to understand different ages and generations. The baby boomer model, where everyone looks the same, doesn’t exist. Twenty percent of our employees, for example, are single dads. That is a diversity issue. Absolutely.”


    “We want to make sure our associates don’t have to leave themselves at the door,” Requiro says. “Our culture-change effort is to make sure all people’s talents are fully used and organizationally developed.”


    She had been an “inclusion specialist” in HR until eight years ago, when an executive vice president began developing the relationship-building and culture-change effort. It was decided that the role of human resources would be operational. HR would be involved in processes and policy. The diversity department would be more strategic, and would be responsible for a range of employees including auto dealers, administrators and managers, Requiro says.


    As one of the champions, Loescher says he develops strategies for helping employees change their perceptions. Before moving to Toyota Motor Sales’ headquarters last spring, he and a fellow champion developed a plan at an all-white, all-male parts distribution center in Kansas City, Missouri. The goal wasn’t to change demographics but to develop better communication and a strategy for building stronger relationships.


    He says there was distrust among managers and associates at the 37-person center, and difficulty getting associates involved in operations improvement, safety projects and even holiday planning.


    The inclusion strategy he helped develop includes open discussions at daily “breakout” meetings and an hourlong monthly meeting where 37 chairs are arranged in a circle in the cafeteria and every employee is given one minute to express an issue or concern. Meeting rules include an agreement not to blame others and to fully participate in resolving the problem.


    Before the new plan was implemented, there were employees who had worked together at the center for 30 years who didn’t know their sons were on the same baseball team. But the meetings have resulted in far more interaction throughout the center, Loescher says.


    “Everyone learns that it’s not just management that’s responsible for the workplace,” he adds. “At Toyota, we are a collective workforce.”


    The strategy has paid off. Several Toyota facilities recently have had to make major shifts in employee schedules to meet the needs of dealers who want to order parts later in the workday. That means asking center employees to begin their workday four hours later, a potentially significant morale problem.


    Thanks to greatly improved communication and trust at the parts center, however, Loescher says the transition has been easier than it has been at similar facilities.


    “It’s amazing how habituated we all are,” Loescher notes. “People get lost in cubicles all day. But when you know who you work with and make sure everyone is heard, it changes the way you think about solving problems.”


    At Toyota–which recently passed Ford to rank as the second-biggest automaker in the U.S. and is one of the world’s 10 most profitable companies–diversity and inclusion are among the top priorities, says Jerome Miller, vice president of diversity for Toyota Motor Sales. They are “integral to our business strategy and surely contribute to our company’s success.”


    “Our diversity champions promote inclusion and leverage workforce diversity at the grass-roots level,” Miller notes. “That’s where meaningful progress occurs.”


    In the 70-member legal services department, diversity champion Pamela Samuels says there is no question that bringing people together and brainstorming has resulted in changed perceptions and better dialogue between individuals and teams.


    She is a managing attorney who previously worked for a major defense contractor. She says her former employer brought in speakers and paid lip service to issues of diversity and inclusion, but hadn’t made a genuine commitment.


    Referring to the intensive training she has received at Toyota, Samuels says she was amazed by its impact. “I was blown away,” Samuels says. “I am African American and I figured there’s not that much I could learn. But we discussed questions like ‘How do you define yourself?’ and ‘Where did your racial views some from?’


    “It reaches you in your gut. People volunteered to share personal experiences,” Samuels continues. “I found out that one of my white co-workers has an adopted Asian child. If you know people, it gives you a new perspective of them. The other champion from my department is openly gay. I didn’t know her until we worked together as champions.


    “We’ve become very close friends. It’s been a big growth process for me.”


    Once a quarter, the general counsel now shuts down the entire legal services department for a day to promote diversity and inclusion and to share ideas and experiences. “The general counsel, Dian Ogilvie, personally comes to the meetings,” Samuels says. “That’s commitment.”


    Samuels says it’s important that white males are involved in diversity and inclusion programs, and not just people of color. “That defeats the whole purpose,” she notes. “Inclusion makes us all better.”


    Champions also have launched business partnering groups that address specific issues for women, Latinos, and African and Asian Americans to better understand workforce needs and to help develop diversity strategies. The groups have had a significant impact on the organization, Requiro says.


    Though Toyota is still in the process of developing metrics to measure business results, Requiro attributes higher sales in some locations directly to improved team development, and points to the company’s unprecedented low turnover of 3 percent as the best measure of employee satisfaction.


    Michael C. Hyter, president and CEO of Novations Group in Boston, says he believes that more companies are asking hard questions about quantifying the value of diversity programs. Still, he notes, “Just because specific measures don’t exist does not mean that the programs aren’t good. But the emotional ‘positives’ behind the effort have to be evident to the employees and leaders.”


    Toyota Motor Sales vice president Mike Morrison, who leads the University of Toyota, says they are definitely evident. “Diversity champions work on culture, which is important on the business side,” Morrison says. “We want to represent changing demographics and to create an equitable playing field. We do it because it’s good business. And it is the right thing to do.”


    At Toyota, diversity and inclusion go well beyond compliance. “We have to develop human resources–this is more important than anything,” Toyota president Katsuaki Watanabe has said. “We will also use the principle of genchi genbutsu, or ‘going to the source’ to evaluate our strengths and weaknesses.”


    That is what diversity champions are primed to do.

Posted on June 20, 2002July 10, 2018

The Business Benefits of Yoga

No one knows if ancient yogis thought much about improving the workplace by teaching classes in breathing, bending, arching, stretching, and lunging. It seems unlikely they ever dreamed that the practice of yoga would one day have a thing to do with the bottom line.


But they would, no doubt, be tickled pink to learn that the holistic Indian tradition would one day be considered an effective method for promoting better business decisions by lowering stress. Though it appears that there’s no real threat that corporate America is about to become blissed-out, there are signs that classes in yoga are swiftly gaining in popularity. In office parks and corporate work-out rooms from San Diego to Providence, rank and file employees and barefoot executives are slipping into comfortable clothes to learn techniques for developing better strength and balance, and to create “unions between the mind and the body.” That’s the definition of the Sanskrit word yoga.


At Texas Instruments headquarters in Dallas, spokesman Matt McKinney estimates that about 100 employees and members of their families attend a yoga workshop after hours every week — adding up to about 5,000 visits a year — at the company’s “Texins Activity Center.” The program began in the early 1990s, and is steadily growing. “In the last two years, it’s really taken off,” McKinney says. “Our employees find that yoga is the one thing that allows them to release stress.”


When your body is at rest and your soul is at peace, you make better decisions, says Angela Calafiore, founder of Serendipity Yoga in Encinitas, California. She specializes in bringing yoga to corporate settings, meetings, and trade shows, and emphasizes that it isn’t at all necessary to be able to convert your body into a pretzel to practice yoga. Yoga is for workout warriors, and for couch potatoes. It’s for people of all ages and levels of health and coordination. It can be done in groups, or alone. And it is offered by all kinds of organizations — manufacturing and technology firms, banks, child and family services, advertising companies, schools, law offices, fire houses, she says.


The idea is that deep breathing and stretching exercises release muscle tension and allow people to be “present” in their bodies. “Yoga helps you stay calm, and you become more approachable,” Calafiore says. “When you can rest in your body, your mind becomes more flexible. You aren’t as reactionary.”


If, for example, you are a manager who has to discipline an employee and you take a few minutes for yoga breathing and stretching exercises beforehand, “you will be calm, centered, focused, and grounded,” she says. “Yoga helps cut down on in-house conflicts. It’s an easy way to give your self a boost and to be more alert. It’s a way for everyone — from clerks to executives — to become more flexible and compassionate.”


Like most yoga instructors, Calafiore ends her sessions with the simple word namaste. It is a concept not immediately associated with the workplace, but one that she insists can be learned. It means: the divine in me bows to the divine in you.


Namaste.


Workforce, December 2001, p. 19 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 17, 2002July 10, 2018

Nine Steps to Make Values Matter

When developing an effective ethics program, Joan Dubinsky, labor attorney and president of the Rosentreter Group, business ethics consultants in Kensington, Maryland, recommends asking the following questions:

1. Commitment from the Top


What outcome does senior management wish to achieve?


How does senior management demonstrate its commitment and involvement?


2. Code(s) of Conduct


Do we have written guidance for our employees and other stakeholders?


Do the rules “work” for all of our businesses? Can employees find and apply these rules?


3. Communication


How do we communicate our messages? Do employees hear and believe us?


How well do we handle change?


4. Training


What is our training strategy?


How do we reinforce knowledge of our values and rules, and build capacity to exercise judgment?


5. Resources


Where do employees go with a question or problem? Is asking for advice rewarded?

How reliable and trusted are our resources?


6. Implementation


Do our systems work smoothly and efficiently?


Do we work effectively across business units?


Are roles and responsibilities easy to understand and to honor?


7. Rewards and Recognition


Are we consistent in applying our values, standards, and rules?


Do we make “living our values” critical for recruiting, hiring, rewarding, recognizing, evaluating, promoting, and compensating our people?

8. Audits and Assessments


What methods shall we use to evaluate our efforts?


How are internal investigations conducted?


9. Revision and Reform


Do we periodically update our values, rules, and program content?


Are we committed to continuous improvement?


Workforce, June 2002, p. 30 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on March 22, 2002July 10, 2018

The Recognition and Performance Link

Many people in HR dismiss awards and incentives programs as “feel good”activities. But evidence suggests there is a strong link between non-cash awardsand incentives and improved job performance, says employee-recognition expertand best-selling author Bob Nelson.


Nelson’s study, conducted from September of 1999 to June of 2000, is basedon responses from managers and their employees in 34 organizations ranging from Universal Studios to the U.S. Postal Service.


He says that several performance-related variables were found to have broad support from managers in the study, the majority of whom agreed or stronglyagreed with the following items (listed with percentage of agreement):

  • Recognizing employees helps me better motivate them. (90.5 percent)

  • Providing non-monetary recognition to my employees when they do good workhelps to increase their performance. (84.4 percent)

  • Recognizing employees provides them with practical feedback. (84.4percent)

  • Recognizing my employees for good work makes it easier to get the workdone. (80.3 percent)

  • Recognizing employees helps them to be more productive. (77.7 percent)

  • Providing non-monetary recognition helps me to achieve my personal goals.(69.3 percent)

  • Providing non-monetary recognition helps me to achieve my job goals.(60.3 percent)

Nelson also found that 72.9 percent of managers reported that they receivedthe results they expected when they used non-monetary recognition eitherimmediately or soon thereafter, and 98.8 percent said they thought theyeventually would obtain the desired results.


Of the 598 employees who reported to the managers in the study, 77.6 percentsaid that it was very or extremely important to be recognized by their managerwhen they do good work. Employees expected recognition to occur: immediately (20percent), soon thereafter (52.9 percent), or sometime later (18.8 percent).


“If you look at companies employees love to work for, you’ll find thatthey recognize their people and tell them they’re doing a great job,” saysNelson, whose books include the best-selling 1,001 Ways to Reward Employees(Workman Publishing, 1994) and, most recently, Please Don’t Just Do What ITell You! (Hyperion, 2001). “Non-cash awards and incentives lower stress,absenteeism, and turnover, and raise morale, productivity, competitiveness,revenue, and profit.”


Nelson’s mantra: “You get what you reward.”


Workforce, April 2002, p. 44 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on September 23, 2001June 29, 2023

Using Technology to Cut Costs

Chris Gonser would never pass as a techno-geek. He’s the director of benefitsand HR for the Ericsson Inc. telecommunications empire, a self-described big-picturefinancial guy and employee advocate. But in the past two years, he’s helpedmastermind a progressive employee self-service system that has become a brightjewel in the company’s ROI crown.


    The economy may be in a nosedive, but technology issoaring into new realms, changing the very nature of the way HR is conductedwhile allowing many organizations to significantly lower costs. It was in January2000 that Gonser and his colleagues at Ericsson’s U.S. headquarters, near Dallasin Richardson, Texas, introduced an HR initiative that has revolutionized theway employee information is disseminated. With 90,000 employees throughout theworld — 8,500 of them in the United States — the global cellular-phone manufacturercan’t afford to be slow-moving, and must be able to provide the latest in employeeservices to its educated, technologically savvy staff.


    The first phase of the three-part program was to rollout an entirely automated compensation system. It was followed last summer bythe debut of an online flexible benefit plan that the company calls e-flex.And in October, a complex pension-administration system premiered.


    Gonser estimates that Ericsson saved more than $1 millionin the first year, and that the HR technology — which was built in-house andis administered by Watson Wyatt Worldwide — already has added more than $1million in organizational value annually. These figures don’t include the “millionsand millions” the company said it will save in difficult to quantify butinvaluable benefits such as attracting and recruiting top talent.


    Other large companies, which have turned to leadersin Internet data-analysis software such as Oracle, SAS, PeopleSoft, IBM, andMicrosoft, are making far heftier investments, but also report substantial costsavings. Sears, for example, made a $57 million investment in HR technologywith PeopleSoft in 1999 that has helped the corporation consolidate multiplesystems and outsourcing. The $41 billion retail firm, which has from 300,000to 320,000 people on its payroll at any given time, expects to make a full returnon its investment by the year 2004, a cost-savings of $16.5 million annually,says Greg Whitson, director of operations and HR at the company’s service centerheadquarters in Atlanta.


    “We are very happy with the conversion process,”he says. “The ultimate test is the ability to do something sensitive correctly,like the payroll system. We did it without a blip.”


    What makes Ericsson’s program unique, Gonser notes,is that “very few companies are doing as much HR online, or are pushingESS as much as we do. Because of the explosiveness of the Internet, we are light-yearsahead of where we were in HR two years ago. With more ESS, HR has become muchmore integrated and strategic.


    “We’ve not only cut costs, we’ve become more efficient,faster, and more organized. Our services help with attracting and recruitingtalent. We are providing more information more accurately. It’s been very, verysuccessful. People’s appreciation has been overwhelming.”


    ESS technology — which integrates and analyzes datainto a single, individualized, accessible platform — is becoming mandatoryfor all types of companies as a way of allowing employees to view and managetheir own records. The new model is shattering the HR tradition by providingexecutives, managers, and employees with a single point of access to vital personnelinformation ranging from compensation and medical planning to performance appraisals.And you don’t have to be a consulting firm or software peddler to understandthe potential benefits: improving customer intelligence; increasing productivity,efficiency, and accuracy; increasing collaboration internally and externally;streamlining operations; serving existing customers better; getting into newmarkets; and, of course, reducing costs.


    If, for example, you can cut out several steps andauthorizations in the recruitment process, you can reduce expenses from as muchas, say, $100 a transaction down to pennies, says Steven Hitzeman, a seniorconsultant at Watson Wyatt Worldwide’s Human Resources Technologies practice.He cites a list of companies that have created efficiencies that minimize costs:

  • As a result of an HR shared-servicesapproach for a large financial institution, benefits transaction costs dropped50 percent.

  • An energy company expanded ESS andreduced HR administration staffing by 40 percent.

  • A large airline implemented an e-HRstrategy that helped reduce the HR staff from 175 to 125 people, savingabout $2.6 million annually with a 25 percent efficiency gain.

    “Technology by itself doesn’t save money,”Hitzeman says. “Technology is the enabling part, not the driver; a tool,not an end in itself. There are three pieces to the equation, and they all haveto be fully utilized or it doesn’t work: People. Process. Technology. Technologyallows you to better apply the process more efficiently. But you do notwant to automate a bad process.”


    Unless you plan carefully and know what it is you wantand need, and how to calculate the hard and soft costs and savings of technology,the ROI will be dubious at best. Hackett Benchmarking & Research, a partof Answerthink, Inc., reports that, despite a 40 percent increase in technologyspending since 1998, HR costs for the average company have actually risen16 percent, to almost $1,900 per employee. Part of the explanation is that manycompanies haven’t taken advantage of the functionality provided by the softwareand haven’t realized the anticipated processing efficiencies, says Pat Carson,consultant manager at Delphi Consultants in Dallas.


    Much to his astonishment, Carson says, most companiesdon’t track the cost-savings of technology. He also believes that “a lotof people are doing ESS for the wrong reasons. They get the employees to maintaintheir own records for them. That’s not right. All they’re doing is pushing thecosts off onto the employee by making them do more work.


    “ESS is really changing,” he adds. “It’snow more ‘Workforce Management.’ It’s a valuable tool for managers. They canlearn instantly what people are working on.” They can ascertain the skillsand work histories of employees down the hall or across the globe, and a hostof other customized information.


    “The trouble with ESS is, a lot of manufacturersand distributors, for example, aren’t trained on computers, or they are smallcompanies that have very little infrastructure or even very well-defined departments,”Carson says. “And the ROI is very difficult to track.”


    Though the cost-savings is most dramatic for the largestcorporations, many small companies report impressive ROIs. Idan Sims, founderof Sims & Associates, Inc., a public relations firm in New York with eightemployees, works with several global companies that have highly sophisticatedtechnology. But by recently investing in more powerful automation, he says,his own small company saved thousands of dollars in a matter of months.


    “It helps us get information into the news mediamuch faster and better, and we’re killing fewer trees. It used to take two supportpeople to send out 60 or 70 press releases. Now the information is all integratedin one system. It’s been a tremendous cost-savings of about $70,000 in onlyone year, and it’s providing my clients with ‘higher intellectual added value.’Getting the software is the best decision I ever made.”


    Brian Lowenthal, benchmark director at Hackett Benchmarking& Research says it isn’t at all unusual for companies to install a new HRsystem without a comprehensive ROI. Not surprisingly, he does find that verysuccessful companies have very careful HR strategies. “They decide whichprocess will add more value,” he says.


    “If they work the plan, they improve their businessresults. The irony is that companies are investing more in technology but head-countis up. I think it’s astonishing they aren’t seeing more benefits. I can’t proveit, but I think it’s partly how they deploy the technology. Also, I think HRuses it for its own purposes and not for employee self-service. I think theyfear that self-service will lead to their losing their jobs. They perceive technologyas a stumbling block.”


    Lowenthal stresses that HR professionals should understandthese three basic factors in maximizing the cost savings of technology:

  1. Know what the technology is capableof doing and how it will be used.

  2. Don’t try to throw technology ontoa process you don’t understand. You must redesign the process that the technologywill enable. “If you apply technology to a bad process, you will neverrealize the gain.”

  3. Be clear about what peoplehave to do differently to utilize the process.

    For all of the pitfalls that can come when it is notcarefully deployed, technology is the very best way to save money and to enableyour organization to work faster and smarter, says Cynthia Driskill, presidentand CEO of CDG & Associates, a consulting firm in Addison, Texas, that specializesin implementation and maintenance of high-end HR information systems and ESS.”Organizations no longer have a choice. Employees like the control. Thedecision to implement technology isn’t necessarily ROI-driven. It’s strategic.It’s a move to improve employee satisfaction.”


    As the workforce has become more mobile, Gonser says,employees want and “absolutely expect” to have ESS. “At Ericsson,we look at the workforce as ‘free agents’ or ‘knowledge workers.’ People todayare much more savvy about the meaning of their whole benefits package.


    “So we’ve pulled in everything — benefits, SocialSecurity, 401(k), the value of their pensions, and a whole lot more — and it’supdated once a month. We’ve leaped from 20 e-sessions (hits) a day in Januaryof 2000 to 200 a day now. Now the information is refreshed and employees canlook at a total compensation statement. They can model the future value of theirretirement. They can look at it anytime, anywhere.


    “In the beginning, our motivation was cost saving,service, and a system that could be used as a recruitment tool,” Gonseradds. “Think of the money we saved just by not sending people all overthe country to explain the benefits package. Think of all the print savings”of not publishing booklets and bulletins. “A side benefit has been thatwe are much more consistent in our communications. And once it’s set up, it’sset up. We are way out there. And the feedback we are getting has been veryuplifting.”


    For many companies, it isn’t necessary to throw outold technology and start from scratch. People like Stuart Morstead, a founderof Isani Inc., a technology consultancy firm based in Dallas and Houston, specializesin eHR. “I help companies whittle down ‘transaction costs,’ ” he says.”I ask what efficiencies could be achieved with automation.” Eveneliminating one cost, such as $10 saved on FedEx with every new hire, can bea significant saving for a big company, he notes.


    But with an ailing economy, is this the time to investin technology? “Now is a terrific time,” Morstead says. “By now,the technology is tried-and-true. It is not a leap of faith.”


Technology’s Impact on HR:

  • Human Resources Learning Center’sbenchmarkfindings on online employee services
  • Hackett Benchmarking and Research:2001 Book ofNumbers Executive Summary
  • Watson Wyatt reportson technology and HR

Workforce, September2001, pp. 46-51 — Subscribe Now!


Posted on July 25, 2001July 10, 2018

How MetLife Measures Core Behaviors for Leaders, Managers, and Employees

Lisa Weber, the executive vice president of human resources at MetLife, creditsthe company’s upswing to a pay-for-performance program that was implemented threeyears ago. One of the most essential aspects of developing a good plan is to beclear about expectations, she says.


At MetLife, employees are rated on a 1-to-5 scale based on the following competency models of core behaviors — one for leaders andmanagers, another for individual employees:


For leaders/managers:

  • Champions change. Proactively leads and embraces change with innovation,courage, and resiliency. Questions the existing ways of getting things doneand endeavors to improve quality and efficiency.

  • Inspires a shared vision. Creates a compelling mission and purposefor the organization and energizes people to work toward shared goals.

  • Promotes key values. Consistently demonstrates MetLife values. Emphasizesthat people count, and that the company promotes winning from within.

  • Communicates effectively. Shares information and encourages candidand open dialogue. Ensures that people share information and have accessto the information they need to meet their business objectives.

  • Develops talent for the future. Identifies critical skills neededto get results. Creates a work environment that attracts and retains toptalent.

  • Focuses on customers. Works to exceed expectations of customersexternally and internally. Takes immediate action to resolve customers’problems.

  • Produces results. Directs action toward achieving goals that arecritical to MetLife’s success. Sets clear performance expectations thatare aligned to business priorities. Ensures that rewards — financial andnon-financial — are linked to performance.

  • Uses sound business judgment. Applies knowledge of the businessand the industry, and common sense, to make the best decisions.

  • Builds relationships. Excels at building partnerships and fosteringteamwork. Works collaboratively within and across organizational boundariesto achieve common goals.

For individual employees:

  • Adapts to and implements change. Embraces change with innovation,courage, and resiliency.

  • Promotes key values. Consistently demonstrates company values. Conductsbusiness endeavors with truth, sincerity, and fairness.

  • Communicates effectively. Shares information and engages in candidand open dialogue.

  • Focuses on customers. Works to exceed customers’ expectations.

  • Produces results. Directs action toward achieving goals that arecritical to the company’s success.

  • Completes work without close supervision.

  • Manages own performance effectively. Organizes time and prioritiesto achieve business results.

  • Uses sound business judgment. Applies knowledge of the businessand the industry, and common sense, to make the best decisions.

  • Builds relationships and works collaboratively. Excels at buildingpartnerships and working as part of a team.

  • Demonstrates technical and functional expertise.

Workforce, August 2001, p. 30— Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 10, 2001July 10, 2018

Your Wonderful, Terrible HR Life

A s a human resource professional, youare cast in a leading role in the workplace drama. Yet people still have misconceptionsabout the character you play and the performers you support. Some perceive youas a people person and office social worker, others as a paper pusher and partyplanner.


Actually, yousay you are all of those things — and a lot more: strategic business partner,financial counselor, employee advocate, management envoy, legal authority, eventplanner, morale booster, shrink, bureaucrat, bookkeeper, budget analyst, benefitscounselor, talent scout, keeper of records, and dispenser of job offers, payraises, pink slips — and hankies.


Every June, inWorkforce magazine and at Workforce online, you share your stories,tales that speak poignantly and honestly about the range and nature of yourwork, your challenges and joys, your bad days and your good.


This year youcame through in greater numbers and with more candor than ever before. You toldus heart-wrenching stories about having to lay off people who had terminal diseases,conducting exit interviews with sobbing workers, dealing with sensitive transgenderissues, and coping with family tragedies.


“I was drivingback to work from a lunch break and saw a former employee who had been let godue to an extended leave that surpassed boundaries, begging on the side of theroad. I knew he had two young girls at home that he and his wife had adoptedseveral years before. It broke my heart.”


And you candidlyshared your own human frailties and personal mistakes:


“I messedup on payroll for about 300 employees,” one person volunteered. “Icut the checks on the wrong date. I had to come in at 4 a.m. to correct theproblem. As I thought I was finishing up, I noticed a computer problem. Whenvoiding the first checks, none of the deductions credited back. Everything wasoff. It was the longest and worst day of my life.”


You also expressedthe pride and joy you feel when people around you pull together to get a bigjob done, and when people express appreciation for your work.


“My bestday in HR came after a long, exhaustive struggle with an insurance company onbehalf of an employee who was trying to get approval for an oxygen-measuringmachine … to keep her asthmatic daughter from ending up in the emergency room.When I informed the employee that a machine was approved, she cried, and I cried,and it was wonderful.”


And from a managerwho recalled facilitating a company retreat: “People worked on a (mission)statement for the company that reflected the true heart of our employees. Whenyou tap into an employee’s soul, you receive an incredible amount of loyaltyand buy-in to your organization. It’s something that can’t be bought or taught.It (can be) … an almost sacred experience.”


This year, thevast majority of survey respondents were women — 85 percent. About half –49 percent — were under the age of 40. Most of the more than 200 survey participants– 70.8 percent — have worked in HR for more than 5 years, 21.5 percent for10 to 15 years, and 20.1 percent for more than 15 years.


When asked howHR affects key management decisions, 42.2 percent said they were full-fledgedparticipants, 43 percent that they were consulted on important issues but weren’tregulars at the executive management table, and 14.8 percent said they weretypically left in the dark.


On questionsabout on-the-job violence and media reports on related trouble in the workplace,36.1 percent said they haven’t been affected at all. But most said they’ve madesome changes: 26.5 percent have more security; 23.1 percent do more pre-employmentscreening; and half — 49 percent — said they pay more attention than theyonce did to workers who seem unhappy or angry. Thirteen percent have actuallyexperienced violence at their companies.


Not surprisingly,the recent economic slowdown has had a palpable impact on many in HR: 23 percenthave had to lay people off in recent months; 37.8 percent have slowed hiring;34.5 percent said they have fewer resources for projects such as HRMS upgradesand critical software training. Despite a cooling economy, however, 34.5 percentsaid their company hasn’t been affected by changes in the economy at all.


This year’sparticipants came from a wide range of industries, from the military to mentalhealth. Many (24.4 percent) came from manufacturing/software/systems, the government/military/nonprofit(14.1 percent), and the services sector such as health (12.8 percent). Otherindustries included travel, entertainment, hotels and restaurants, commercialfood processing, the Internet marketplace, logistics, social service agencies,and education.


In this year’ssurvey, participants were asked for personal comments about HR, and they wroteup a storm.


Hereare snapshots of their responses:


 


  1. What is the biggestmisconception about a career in HR?


  2. What’s the smartestthing you ever did in the course of your HR career?


  3. Tell us aboutyour worst day in HR.


  4. Tell us aboutyour best day in HR.


  5. What’s the bestthing you ever learned about HR from an employee?


  6. Have you evercreatively broken your company’s rules to accomplish something youthought was important?


  7. What one long-term money-saving idea won you kudos from top management?


  8. What one cost-cuttingidea that’s worked for you could other HR professionals implementimmediately?


  9. If you had yourHR career to do over again, what one thing would you do differently?


  10. What one pieceof advice did you receive that made a difference in your career?


  11. What one book,fiction or non-fiction, most influenced your professional development,and why?


What is the biggest misconceptionabout a career in HR?
Given an anonymous opportunity to grumble and complain,many of you did. “The biggest misconception is that HR is fun and you getto work with people,” one person groused. When people think HR, they “don’tthink about layoffs, demotions, people being passed over for promotion, harassmentcomplaints, personality conflicts, and all of the other things that show upat the door of an HR practitioner.”


Of all the peoplewho responded, no one said HR is easy. Nor was there any agreement on HR’s rolein the workplace. “One misconception is that you will have a seat at thetable,” some said. Others had quite a different view: “The misconceptionis that HR is administrative rather than strategic.”


Other responses:


  • “That HR can function as a separateentity from the rest of the company.”


  • “That HR has no intrinsic valueand eats budget money.”


  • “That it is all warm and fuzzycommunications with the workers. Or that it is creative and involved inmaking a more congenial atmosphere for people at work. Actually it is bothof those some of the time, but most of the time it is a big mountain ofpaperwork which calls on a myriad of skills besides the ‘people’ type. Itis law, accounting, economics, philosophy, and logic as well as psychology,spirituality, tolerance, and humility.”


Returnto Top


What’s the smartest thingyou ever did in the course of your HR career?
Of all the questions you answered, none prompted amore unanimous response. Over and over again, you said that the smartest thingyou did was to continue learning by going to school, earning degrees, upgradingskills. Many mentioned receiving SPHR certification. Several stressed the importanceof changing jobs, and of knowing every facet of an organization.


“Findingout firsthand what line people think,” one person said. “I made pizzas.I made tacos. I sold merchandise. I counted trees. I negotiated land deals.I learned the business of my (internal) clients and I learned to talk theirlanguage.”


Other commentsincluded:


  • “Embedded my ethics into mywork and allowed the feminine aspect of me to shine in my work instead ofhiding it behind a corporate ‘suit.'”


  • “Learned to be generalist, allaspects of HR…Moved to a company where HR was active in management.”


  • “Started employee-recognitionprograms. The simple act of recognizing an employee’s performance in frontof their peers can make all the difference when it comes to productivityand retention.”


Returnto Top

Tell us about your worstday in HR
Survey respondents particularly liked this invitation.And it is understandable. Many have experienced dreadful and dangerous daysthat only their HR colleagues can truly comprehend.


“On thefirst day of my new job, I had to fire an employee whom I’d fired in my previousjob,” one recalled. Another said simply, “Having to conduct six exitinterviews in one day and then having my boss conduct mine!”


A person in thefood industry remembered the day she had to terminate a butcher with a drugproblem. “He was very moody and aggressive. When he entered my office hehad on his knife belt…”


Many mentionedterminations and union problems, losing court cases, and receiving officialcharges in the mail from the EEOC. Some talked about handling sexually sensitiveissues. “My worst day was when a male employee came into my office andannounced that he was beginning a ‘transgender’ process, which included comingto work dressed as a woman.” And, “Counseling two transvestites aboutappropriate behavior and appearance at work.”


But it was thestories of violence and illness that often were the most compelling. One respondenttalked about the day her HR administrator’s “estranged 6-foot-4-inch, 250-poundhusband came to work, drunk, high on steroids, and wielding a knife.”


Other memorablestories:


  • “My worst day was with an employeewith emotional problems. She was picking fights with people because shethought she was being possessed by evil spirits dwelling within others.While we were talking, she slithered to the floor and began writhing andflicking her tongue out, as if she were a snake.”


  • “When I worked in a departmentstore and had personnel and store operations reporting to me. One of mysecurity staff was stabbed by a shoplifter. She survived, but all of mysecurity people handed in their resignations.”


  • “Letting go someone who’d justreceived a cancer diagnosis.”


  • “Having to terminate a largegroup of tenured employees for e-mail abuse, specifically pornography. Theinvestigation was massive and the content pretty horrific.”


Returnto Top

Tell us about your bestday in HR
Everyone needs a pat on the back. HR people often aremore likely to give the pats than to receive them. So it isn’t surprising thatmany respondents said that their best day was when they received a thank-youcard or flowers, or some other form of appreciation or acknowledgment for ajob well done.


Many expressedthoughts like this: “Every day I’m able to help an employee make his orher workplace a better place is the best day in HR.”


Respondents tookpride and satisfaction in helping to recruit good people, seeing them promoted,designing higher pay scales, saving companies from expensive lawsuits. But thebest days were more personal.


“The nightArthur got off his night shift in shipping and came up to my office for a cupof coffee. ‘You know I own a house? Twenty years ago when I was running in thestreets, it wasn’t even a dream of mine. I would never have thought I’d owna house of my own. This job’s made it possible.’ “


And from others:


  • “I was given a large and unexpectedpay raise.”


  • “Strangely enough, the day aftera major layoff. I’d been given two weeks to reduce head count 30 percent.A large number of employees and members of the leadership team complimentedour group on our thoroughness, organization, and compassion. Dealing withaffected employees and survivors, it was probably the toughest thing I’vehad to do in my career, but it was really gratifying to know that we hadpreserved the dignity of everyone involved.”


  • “The day I passed out $100 billsto employees who’d completed a training program. At first they thought theywere pink slips.”


Returnto Top

What’s the best thingyou ever learned about HR from an employee?
“Tell the truth 100 percent of the time. Whateveryou do, DO NOT LIE!”


Answers to thisquestion tended to be short and direct. “Don’t offer advice unless asked.””Every day I have the opportunity to change someone’s life.” “Alwaysmaintain a sense of humor.” “When you treat employees with respect,no matter what their position is in the organization, they will come throughfor you.”


“That Ican make a difference in someone’s life just by listening and offering honestfeedback.” “Never make assumptions about anyone.” “Listen,listen, listen.” “Don’t gossip; be patient.” “Don’t sugarcoatbad news.” “Don’t assume anything.”


Returnto Top


Have you ever creativelybroken your company’s rules to accomplish something you thought was important?
Although more people said they operated under the assumptionthat it’s easier to ask for forgiveness than to beg for permission, severaldid say they wouldn’t under any circumstance break rules. Dozens more, however,shared experiences in which the voice within won out.


“An applicantwho came to us from a homeless organization confessed during the interview thathe had a criminal record,” one respondent related. “Normally, I wouldhave declined to hire him, but I could tell that he had come clean, was sincere,and really needed an opportunity. After a lot of consideration, I recommendedhim for hire.


“He workedin a position in the warehouse where he stocked shelves with equipment and sweptthe floor. His love for his work was apparent to everyone. Within three monthshe received the Employee of the Month award and became a company spokesman tothe community. He worked hard, was honest, and was a truly good person. AlthoughI can say that I wouldn’t do it for everyone, sometimes you have to trust yourgut and take a risk.”


Others offeredthese comments:


  • “No. To break the rules hereusually costs you your job.”


  • “Sure. The most creative wayto get around some policies is to formulate a work group or task force tobrainstorm ways of achieving an outcome.”


  • “Comp time. I have often allowedmy HR employees to flex their schedules to accommodate things that theyhave going on.”


Returnto Top

What one cost-cuttingidea that’s worked for you could other HR professionals implement immediately?
Though respondents came up with many creative ideas,a general theme emerged: the Internet is a good and affordable recruiting tool.


Other ideas included:


  •  “High-attendance incentiveprogram where employees earn ‘banked’ hours with 100 percent attendancethat can be used for emergencies, and hours not used are paid out at theend of the year. Our absenteeism rate dropped from 3.56 percent to 2 percentin less than a year.”


  • “Training in-house is much cheaperthan sending everyone out to seminars.”


  • “Use a digital camera insteadof requesting new hires to submit a printed photo. No development costsor waiting time.”


  • “Use self-funded insurance.”


  • “An employee-referral program.”


  • “Hand-written notes and computer-madecertificates have an impact on morale way beyond their cost.”


  • “Recruit on the Internet!”


  • “Instead of providing full relocationto college students, give them cash. They will move themselves, have cashin pocket, and think more positively about the company. In my workplacewe saved about $5,000 per student, $100,000 annually.”


Returnto Top

What one long-term money-savingidea won you kudos from top management?
It was a question that one incredulous HR professionalsimply couldn’t relate to. “Kudos from management?”


Many others sharedconcrete ideas:


  • “Researching and applying forstate training grants.”


  • “Billboard advertising at theintersection of two major highways.”


  • “Web recruitment. Costs havedropped and applicant pool has grown.”


  • “Really shopped around for insurancecompanies even though it’s the most boring job on the planet. Some companiesare a little better, a little more flexible, and a lot cheaper.”


  • “Welcome alternative work schedulesand grant more flextime.”


Returnto Top

If you had your HR careerto do over again, what one thing would you do differently?
Surprisingly, several people responded, “I wouldnot change a thing.” But there were a few who grumbled, “Not go intoHR.”


Other popularresponses included: Gotten my degree sooner. Started my career earlier. Stayedout of management — too much stress from execs. Gotten an education in HR.Learned to listen better. Not argued with senior management about issues thatreally weren’t important. Changed jobs more often.


Returnto Top

What one piece of advicedid you receive that made a difference in your career?
Once again, themes emerged, particularly thoughts aboutgetting an education, finishing a degree, listening more. “Paper wins”and “Document everything” also were frequent responses. Several answeredwith brief comments, often with an exclamation mark: Innovate! Network! Care!Never settle!


Other advice:


  • “Know your employees, and letthem know you care about them.”


  • “Fire someone in the first 30days of your employment. It establishes your presence in the company.”


  • “Don’t burn any bridges.”


  • “Take responsibility for youractions.”


Return to Top

What one book, fictionor non-fiction, most influenced your professional development and why?
HR professionals would make up one weird book group.Their tastes range from self-help business books such as Don’tSweat the Small Stuff, First,Break All the Rules, and Escapefrom Cluelessness to OfMice and Men, ToKill a Mockingbird, and the Bible.


And, in keepingwith their rich range of responses to the survey, they admire writers as differentas AynRand, with her devotion to capitalism, and the Dalai Lama, with his dedicationto compassion.


Returnto Top

Thanks to surveyrespondents, we at Workforce — and our readers throughout the world– have learned a great deal about today’s HR professionals: what you care about,what you’re up against, and the nature of your role as a leading player in theworkplace drama. Your comments help move the profession forward, and assistus all in our understanding of work that is — whether confounding or rewarding– of vital significance in the workplace today.


We’d love tohear more from you. Please drop us a line.


Workforce, June 2001, pp. 32-38– Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 9, 2001July 10, 2018

A Controversial Child-Care Study Has a Message for HR

At first glance, the results of the largest long-term study of child care inthe United States seemed to prove that working moms really ought to feel guilty.Research findings in the project, which was sponsored by the National Instituteof Child Health and Human Development, show that children cared for by someoneother than their mothers for more than 30 hours a week — including relativesand even dads — are more likely to display problem behavior in kindergarten.For working parents and employers, the report was profoundly disturbing.


    News reports seized on the link between child care andbehavior problems. One of the lead researchers — Jay Belsky, a longtime foe ofday care — cast a very negative spin on the results, arguing that working momsbelong at home taking care of their kids. But a closer look at the statisticsreveals them to be far less alarming. Only 17 percent of the children in daycare showed “explosive,” “disobedient,” or”aggressive” tendencies, and even these behaviors were in the normalrange. The other 83 percent displayed no such tendencies. And, since 9 percentof children who stay at home are seen by teachers as aggressive, the realdifferential is only 8 percent.


    At a time when many families need two incomes just tosurvive, several study investigators say, the initial interpretation of theresults caused unnecessary concern. But they are quick to add that the report ishelping to refocus attention on family-friendly policies in the workplace, andthe overwhelming need for businesses to be responsive to the realities ofemployees’ day-to-day lives.


    “It’s very important that corporate America step upto the plate about on-site child care and family-friendly workenvironments,” says Virginia Allhusen, a research professor at theUniversity of California/Irvine who participated in the study. “One of thehuge issues for parents is that child care is incredibly expensive. It’s laborintensive. The cost of child care for families as a percent of income is third– only behind food and shelter.”


    In order to be competitive, businesses must also becompassionate, says Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, a professor of psychology at TempleUniversity who also served as a study investigator. “It’s very importantthat employers allow families choices with things like flextime schedules. Weknow that the quality of child care makes a big difference. We also know thatthere are those who say children might be better off poor than in child care.There is no question: the single biggest problem facing children ispoverty.”


    Investigator Margaret Tresch Owen, a psychologist at theUniversity of Texas/Dallas, says the study “may suggest that part-time workmay be more ideal for many families. We ought to add information from the studyto the argument about family leave time. We ought to look at this as anopportunity for parents to push for more consideration in the workplace.”


Workforce, June 2001, p. 17 —  SubscribeNow!

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 Page 2

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress