Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Kelly Dunn

Posted on April 14, 2000June 29, 2022

Sample Communication Policy

Person on laptop

Following is a sample communication policy in the workplace. The purpose of such a policy should be to facilitate better communication, paving the way for better business. Keep this basic principle in mind as you adjust the policy to coincide with your business’ values.

Also read: How to use technology in your internal communications strategy

Sample Communication Policy 

At Make Your Business Better, Inc., courtesy, tact and consideration should guide each employee in relationships with fellow workers and the public. It is mandatory that each employee in this organization show maximum respect to every other person in the organization and other contacts in a business context. The purpose of communication should be to help others and to make our business run as effectively as possible, thereby gaining the respect of our colleagues and customers.

  • Courtesy, friendliness, and a spirit of helpfulness are important and guide the company’s dealings with employees and customers.
  • Differences of opinion should be handled privately and discreetly. Gossip and backbiting are to be avoided. Communicate directly with the person or persons involved to resolve differences.
  • Conservative criticism — that which will improve business by clarifying or instructing — should be welcomed when delivered with respect and tact. Destructive criticism — that which is designed to harm business or another person — is not to be practiced.
  • Employees should strive to maintain a civil work atmosphere at all times and refrain from shouting, yelling, using vulgarities or swearing at co-workers or customers.
  • The standard of Make Your Business Better, Inc. is a work environment free from disparaging remarks about religion, ethnicity, sexual preferences, appearance and other non-work related matters. Each employee has the responsibility to foster an understanding of others’ differences in order to create an environment where those differences contribute to a better organization.Inappropriate remarks based on any of the following are not tolerated and such behavior will result in immediate termination of employment: race, religion, ethnic origin, physical attributes, mental or physical disability, color, ancestry, marital status, pregnancy, medical condition, citizenship and/or age.Inappropriate remarks include those that treat a group of people in a uniform way, assign a behavior in a disparaging way, imply inferiority of a group, are supposedly funny at someone else’s expense, and/or cause embarrassment or distress to others based on comments about a particular group of people.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion.

Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

 

Posted on March 1, 2000July 10, 2018

Training Conference Launches a NASA Move

Marshall Space Flight Center, a division of the National Aeronautics andSpace Administration (NASA), had to find a way to launch its employees on atraining mission — fast.


The Huntsville, Alabama-based facility, encompassing 31 buildings andemploying over 2,000 people, faced a massive reorganization in May 1999. HR knewthat a training conference was the best way to effectively use employees’ timeduring the reconfiguration of office equipment and furniture. But an acceleratedmove schedule meant that HR and management had to work together at light speedto assemble a training program for the entire workforce in time for thesix-day-long reorganization.


Both the brevity of the move and Center-spanning training program presentedchallenges. The decision to speed up the Marshall Center move resulted fromfeedback by many employees who, because the Center had not gone through areorganization in over 25 years, felt apprehensive about the move.


“Some of these people had been in the same office for their entirecareers,” says Greg Walker, director of employee and organizationaldevelopment for the Center. Thom Holden, who acted as project manager for thetraining, adds, “We had a situation where we didn’t want to string themove over several months — we wanted minimal disruption.”


But, as Sheila Cloud, director of center operations, points out, “In thenormal government manner, such a move would take 18 months from start to finish,as it did with one of our sister agencies. That concerned us because we saw thatthis was a waste of funds, and it put far too much stress on theworkforce.”


Benchmarking against the sister agency showed that a quick moving schedulewas feasible. Training would get the employees out of the office so therelocation could be done quickly. Certainly conducting training for all theemployees seemed like the best possible use of their time and salaries whiletheir offices were being moved.


“At Marshall, all employees have to complete a certain amount oftraining by the end of the year,” says Walker, “so the training was agreat opportunity for employees to get it out of the way.”


HR also saw the move as an opportunity to build employee morale. “Wewanted to present something really first-class to ease employee anxiety,”says Greg Walker. “Change is really tough for a lot of people, so we wantedto make the training a positive experience for everyone who attended.”


Teamwork helps the idea fly.


When it came to conducting training for so many employees, Marshall Centerfound itself without a model. “Neither our sister agencies nor we had neverdone anything like this before,” says project manager Holden. “Centeroperations teamed up with HR in the office of employee and organizationaldevelopment, meeting on how best to accomplish the training.”


Adds Cloud, “When you’re working in government, you’re sensitive tothe fact that the salaries of the people are also the taxpayers’ money.”So the two offices decided that a training “conference” at a centrallocation would be the most cost-effective option. “Once that was decided,the challenge was whether we could pull it off or not,” laughs Cloud.


The accelerated moving schedule left the team with a month-long timeframe toput the training together. “Normally, arranging a training session with2,000 people takes four months or longer,” says Holden. “It wasn’ttotally undoable, but we had to find a venue, coordinate all the instructors,and watch the budget, too.” Fortunately, Holden and his staff were able tosecure the use of the Huntsville Civic Center, which had both a main hall andseparate classrooms, for the duration of the training.


The sheer diversity of the large workforce attending the training conferenceproved another difficult point to navigate. “That was a big caveat — thatwe were moving the whole workforce. Therefore, the training venue had to beuseful to the many occupations within the Center,” says Holden. That wouldprove no easy feat. The Marshall Center boasts scientists, engineers, ITspecialists, security personnel, clerical workers, and several levels ofmanagement. On the other hand, “We didn’t want to go to the conferenceand teach basketweaving,” says Cloud.


The team then collaborated to make the training conference as beneficial aspossible. With Holden at the helm as training specialist, the team heldbrainstorming sessions to come up with classes that would appeal to the widerange of employees at Marshall.


Then, the entire staff, using existing training vendors and their owncontacts, networked to see which vendors could offer the training in the propertime frame. “Then we worked our infrastructure around that — quite astretch from the way we’d normally handle things,” says Holden.


Despite the time crunch, the team managed to book instructors for generalinterest-type courses, such as team building, e-mail etiquette, and first aid,as well as for mandatory IT and ISO 9000 courses. Other classes were designed toappeal to unique worker situations, including an abbreviated course inconversational Italian to help a contingent of engineers who work with Italiancohorts in the space program.


The training unfolds …


As the training schedule flew into place, an in-house graphics department puttogether a conference-style class itinerary training sessions. One week beforethe training conference, a special Web site went up with a FAQ page to answeremployees’ questions about the training and provide directions to the civiccenter.


Says Cloud, “We burned a lot of midnight oil to set the training up intime and make sure every detail was taken care of.” The details includedeverything from planning for inclement weather to making special arrangementswith the City of Huntsville to see that employees would have ample parkingspaces at the civic center, most of which are normally reserved for cityemployees.


At the same time, the team worked to generate anticipation for the training.”Our goal was to make it exciting for the employees,” says Walker.”We wanted employees to see that positive things were afoot and reallyenjoy themselves at the conference.”


Employees pulling into the parking lot on the first day of the trainingbeheld a custom-made banner emblazoned with the training conference slogan,”Marshall on the Move.” They walked to the center on a path decoratedwith colorful balloons.


Once inside, employees gathered in the civic center’s main hall for a townhall-style meeting, with management on hand to answer questions about therelocation. When the meeting broke for individual classes, volunteer greeterscheerfully directed employees to the correct rooms for training seminars.


During breaks between sessions, employees could stroll and view exhibitsdetailing different Center projects. The training team even took the time torefresh the balloons each morning to present a new appearance to returningemployees.


Employee turnout, tracked with attendance cards and evaluation forms, was amajority of the workforce, even though employees had the option of taking comptime during the move. Walker claims out that the key to the training’s successwas its attention to detail, designed to make Marshall Center employees feellike stars.


To minimize concern about employee safety, training staff made the trainingsessions entirely self-contained, bringing in boxed lunches and providing a bankof phones, fax machines and copiers so that employees could check in with theirfamilies or pick up voice-mail. The normally businesslike dress code was relaxedto casual for the entire week of training. Holden explains, “I knew if wemade the conference a comfortable learning environment, they’d like it. Wewanted to make them feel special.”


Evidently, they did. The human resources team received rave reviews, both inthe form of evaluations and a galaxy of complimentary e-mails, from all levelsof employees in the organization.


Six days of training saved more than $1 million.


The “Marshall on the Move” training conference turned out so wellthat it was nominated by NASA for a “Continual Improvement” Award, adefinite nod of approval, since award nominations usually focus on scientificand technical achievements within the agency.


Thom Holden says, “What it really boils down to is the fact that weworked together as a team. It’s a long process to rewrite the way peoplethink, we’re at a point where we know that if we all work together, we cancomplete any project.”


The HR team is even prouder of the fact that in all, the speedyreorganization and training conference saved the U.S. government over $1million. The training itself proved so effective that the Marshall Center nowplans to make the training conference an annual event.


More importantly, employee morale is a far cry from its anxious vibe beforethe move. “The employees could tell by the quality of the training and thecare that went into it that Marshall Center was sending a message,” saysCloud. “That message was, ‘We care about you.’ They appreciated thefact that we tried to keep the move as short as possible and that we reallyworked to make the training useful to them.”


Holden adds: “I may sound like a commercial for the space program, but Ireally do refer to NASA as the ‘great frontier.’ With every accomplishmentthere’s risk involved, and certainly everyone in this agency knows that. Butwhether it’s a training conference or a mission to Mars, we’re alwaysadapting and working to have the best possible outcome for the people weserve.” Mission accomplished.


Workforce, March 2000, Vol. 79, No. 4, pp. 128-131 —Subscribenow!

Posted on February 27, 2000July 10, 2018

The Graceful Leaving Policy

Nowhere is Jellyvision’s innovative human resources perspective and respectful treatment of employees more evident than in the company’s Graceful Leaving Policy (GLP).


The GLP encourages employees who are planning on leaving the company to give as much notice as possible, without fear of reprisal and with the option to change their minds and stay at Jellyvision. HR Director Vaiva Vaisnys says, “We’re a project-based company, so we encourage people to give as much notice as possible so that whatever project they’re working on isn’t left in the lurch.”


Says Founder Harry Gottlieb, “Our company president, Liz Michaels, and Vaiva really made me understand that how you treat people when they’re leaving says everything about you.” Employees who follow the policy receive a prorated portion of their year-end bonus.


According to Vaisnys, it isn’t unusual for exiting employees to provide four, five, or even six months’ notice. “For us, it’s all about the relationship,” she says. “We want the best for our products and for our employees, so when they succeed, whether that’s in what they’re working on here or at what they do outside Jellyvision, we celebrate that success.”


“When people leave here, generally there are very good feelings,” remarks Gottlieb. “That’s important in terms of what it says about the entire organization. You don’t need to be clandestine. You can tell us, and expect that we’ll work with you and treat you in a responsible, caring manner.”


Workforce, March 2000, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 64.


Posted on December 23, 1999July 10, 2018

How To Be a Great HR Professional—According to Scrooge

Charles Dickens famous story, “A Christmas Carol,” is about embracing the spirit of the season. But it’s also about one employer’s (Ebenezer Scrooge s) relationship, or lack thereof, with his employee (Bob Cratchit). It took some prodding by the Ghosts of Christmas, but Scrooge eventually became, to quote Dickens, “as good a master, as good a man, as the old city ever knew.” Here are some HR lessons to take away from the tale—no ghosts required.


  • Pay competitive market salaries.
    It’s important for morale and productivity, Besides, jobs aren t scarce anymore, as they were in Bob Cratchit’s day, and employees won t wait for their employers to have a supernatural experience and increase their salaries. They will simply go elsewhere.
  • Consider work/life issues from the standpoint of significant others, as well as employees.
    Poor Tiny Tim could have used the services of a decent HMO, and Bob Cratchit needed some time to take care of his ailing son and celebrate the holiday. Make sure employees have access to the resources they need.
  • Every once in a while, spot-check employees environments.
    Are they comfortable? Productivity-enhancing? Just think of how much more productive Bob Cratchit would have been if Scrooge had allowed him to buy more coal during those freezing London winters. The firm of Marley & Scrooge could have used some sprucing up, too. Try to provide an inviting environment to encourage better work.
  • Show genuine interest in employees careers.
    Ebenezer Scrooge owed a debt to his former employer, Mr. Fezziwig, who took him on as an apprentice and made sure Scrooge became an expert as his job. Mr. Fezziwig also went a step further by showing his employees the pleasure and rewards of a job well done.
  • In your strategic planning, take into account the organization’s past, the present situation between management, employees and HR, and the bright future both for your organization and you, the new breed—as long as you don’t let the dark shadows of ineffective practices send HR to a nameless and ignoble death.

Posted on November 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Cash-Balance Conversion May Add Up to Age Discrimination

The Internal Revenue Service has indicated that conversion from traditionalpension plans to another type of pension, the cash-balance plan, may result indiscrimination against older workers who have had longer terms of service intheir companies. Cash-balance plans combine the features of 401(k) plans andtraditional pension plans, and are based on a worker’s average salary over theduration of employment with the company, rather than the number of years he orshe has worked. Funds accumulate faster in early years of employment than intraditional plans, and employees have a guaranteed payout that they can take asa lump-sum payment or roll over into another benefit plan or an IRA, should theychange jobs.


This kind of portability appeals to a workforce that is increasingly moremobile. The Employee Benefits Research Institute, a nonprofit researchorganization based in Washington, D.C., reports that only 9.5% of employeesremain in the same job for 20 years or more. Cash-balance plans are consideredby some employers to be a valuable recruitment tool reflecting this trend.


Such major companies as Citigroup, Glaxo Wellcome, and American Express haveor are in the process of switching to cash-balance plans. But the IRS andseveral congressional representatives are concerned that such conversions mayrob long-term workers of the meaty accruals that, in a traditional pension plan,typically build most quickly in the years leading up to retirement. If along-term worker’s traditional pension is supplanted by a cash-balance plan,in which accrual is more evenly distributed, the loss of accelerated benefitsmay mean less accrual for an older employee (longer service) than for a youngeremployee (shorter service) — hence age discrimination. And that spells troublefor companies, who must obtain approval of pension plan changes from the IRS fortax purposes.


An internal memorandum from the IRS district director’s office inCincinnati, released by Representative Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) on September 7,1999, requests advice from the IRS National Office in Washington D.C. on theproposed conversion of one company’s plan from a traditional defined-benefitplan to a cash-balance plan. The district director cites suspicion of violationof Section 411 of the Internal Revenue Service Code — i.e., age discrimination– because the plan’s benefit-accrual rate decreases for employees as they getolder. In addition, the plan is labeled a “backloaded interest creditplan,” “Credit interest plan” is government-speak for”cash-balance plan,” and “backloaded” means that most ofthis cash-balance plan’s accrual impermissibly credits the majority of thepension in the later years of employment, which is also against IRS guidelines.


Despite the fact that a final decision by the Washington, D.C., office of theIRS on the district director’s findings is pending, Corporate America hasfound that there’s much to debate regarding cash-balance conversions. NealSchelberg, partner, employee benefits and executive compensation group with NewYork City-based law firm Proskauer Rose LLP, explains, “[The memo] really
raises for the first time significant legal issues that are related tocash-balance conversions.” These issues include, not only the thornyquestion of tax qualification by the IRS, but the possibility of litigation bylong-term employees who feel they aren’t receiving the benefits due them.


IBM Employees Protest Conversion
Employees at Armonk, New York-based IBM are up in arms about their company’srecent conversion from a traditional pension plan to a cash-balance plan.According to a recent report in USA Today, many long-term employees at thecomputer hardware giant claim that the conversion could cause a loss of overhalf the accrual they would have received with the traditional plan. Theseoutraged employees, the report says, are forming unionization committees,decrying the new plan to the press and threatening class-action lawsuits.


However, Schelberg points out that a cash-balance plan doesn’tautomatically mean a dispute with the IRS or employees. “It’s importantnot to generalize,” he says. “Plans differ, and many of theseconversions from defined-benefit plans to cash-balance plans have receivedfavorable determinations from the IRS.” In the case of the company that wascited in the IRS memo, Schelberg notes that “the backloading issuebasically defines the problem. If an employer who’s in the midst of a conversionhas what appears to be a backloaded interest credit plan, consideration shouldbe given to changing that plan.”


And a review of a proposed cash-balance plan is definitely in order ifemployees who expected a certain benefit under a defined-benefit plan find theirfinancial expectations have adjusted downward because of a cash-balance planconversion. “The concept,” explains Schelberg, “is to mitigatethe loss for some individuals.”


Minimizing Conversion Problems
There are many ways employers can minimize or eliminate any negative effectsthat long-term employees may suffer as a result of converting to a cash-balanceplan. Companies may “grandfather” the affected employees in the oldpension plan; add additional years of service to a long-term employee’sopening balance under the cash-balance plan to acknowledge longer service;contribute to a 401(k) plan to offset loss of accrual; or provide stock optionsfor the same purpose. Such provisions can help a company comply with the IRS’requirements and prevent an appearance of discrimination.


Employee awareness during a conversion is also important. “Part of theissue is when conversions were done, employees who were being adversely affecteddidn’t understand how their benefit would be affected, or the technicalitiesof the conversion and its effect on their benefit,” says Schelberg.


Rochester, New York-based Eastman Kodak Co. will officially switch from atraditional pension plan to a cash-balance plan as of January 1, 2000. Toprepare soon-to-be converted employees for the change, Kodak provided them witha rainbow of information in various media, including a “decisionguide” personalized to each employee’s salary and benefits and detailingthe new plan versus the old plan, customizable plan software, seminars led byfinancial experts, a 24-hour hotline, a Web site with frequently askedquestions, and several company-newsletter articles. The information appearedearly in 1999 to allow employees plenty of time to consider the new plan. Kodakalso considered the advice of legal and financial consultants to steer clear ofdiscrimination. Even so, Kodak is still allowing current employees to choose forthemselves whether to stay with the old plan or go with the new. Says RitaMetras, director, total compensation, “We believe everybody will be atleast as well off, and some even better off, with the new plan. But we wanted toprovide as many options as possible.”


Schelberg adds that while employers who are converting their companies tocash-balance plans needn’t panic, they do need to be aware of the IRS’scrutiny and provide fairly for any employee who might lose out due to theconversion. “The sky isn’t falling,” he says, “but watch whereyou step.”


Impact: When converting from a traditional pension plan to a cash-balanceplan, make sure the new plan’s provisions avoid discrimination by providingequal benefits for both newer and long-term employees. Employees should knowwhat their choices are and how the conversion will affect their accruals.


Workforce, October 1999, Vol. 78, No. 10, pp. 22-24— Subscribenow!


 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress