Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Meg Breslin

Posted on February 28, 2013August 3, 2018

Why Companies Are Embracing the Employee Value Proposition

As a college student scouting out potential employers, Greg Bostrom was immediately drawn to Chicago-based Red Frog Events.

In a sea of suits and ties at one career fair, Red Frog’s co-owners wore T-shirts and jeans. He discovered the events company holds races with competitors crawling through mud, jumping over fire and downing beers at the finish line, so it seemed like a fun place to work.

But Bostrom quickly learned that Red Frog had a lot more to offer than a laid-back vibe. An array of benefits and perks spoke to his passions, goals and lifestyle. He’d have to travel around the world to help run the events and put in long hours, but the company offered free health insurance and unlimited vacation days, allowing employees to truly self-direct their time.

Beyond that, there was a clear path for advancement within the company, one-on-one coaching and competitive pay. Even the office space was cool, with a giant treehouse for staff meetings and free beer on tap for after work. Then there was this unusual perk: After five years, any employee could earn a four-week, all-expense-paid sabbatical for travel outside the United States, an incentive for rejuvenating employees and sparking creativity.

Human resources leaders are giving Red Frog’s thoughtful approach to traditional compensation packages another term today: the “employment deal” or the “employee value proposition.” In the proposition, employers spell out the overall deal they offer employees beyond basic salary and benefits, and often include a company vision for what employees can get and give back in return. At a time when many industries are still struggling to attract and retain top talent, many human resources experts say the employment deal is clearly gaining importance.

Bostrom, 24, now Red Frog’s chief innovation officer, says he believes Red Frog’s success lies largely in the co-founders’ employment deal, essentially a vision for a culture built on meeting the goals and expectations of its customers and employees. That special culture also matched the company’s vision for its events: fun, extraordinary affairs that stand out among competitors.

“Every day I come into work at Red Frog, the people here are motivating me. There’s a real team mentality,” Bostrom says. “And there’s always a focus at every meeting on goal setting and accountability for our goals, and where Red Frog envisions people being and where Red Frog envisions the company going.”

Laura Sejen, global practice leader, rewards for HR consultancy Towers Watson & Co., says the employment deal has been a focus of much of Towers Watson’s recent research because there’s mounting evidence of its importance.

“It’s the broadest possible definition of the relationship, or the deal, between the employer and the employee,” she says in describing the ideal employee value proposition. “It encompasses every aspect of the employee experience, and it’s not just about the portfolio of total rewards programs, but it extends to the mission, purpose and values of the company as well as the way they define jobs and the culture of the organization. It really is about that full experience of being an employee in an organization.”

David Insler, senior vice president and West region leader in Sibson Consulting’s Los Angeles office, says his firm has also seen clients place a greater emphasis on the employee value proposition in recent years. Sibson’s clients vary considerably from less than $100 million to Fortune 100 companies and across industry segments, including higher education institutions.

“I have seen more and more companies become more concerned about the clarity of their vision and their visibility and their transparency with employees,” Insler says. “I can’t tell you it’s always because they fully understand the EVP concept, but with the kind of challenging times they’ve experienced over the last three to five years, they know they’ve really got to engage with their employees and develop that level of communication. When things are tough, they know the employees are the ones who will make the difference.”

According to several recent studies, salaries in North America are expected to rise only modestly in 2013, and that’s on top of several stagnant years through the recession. That salary scene also plays into the importance of an employee value proposition, Sejen says.

The recession “put a lot of pressure on the normal financial forms of rewards and caused employers to think more broadly about what it really means to work at an organization,” Sejen says. They’re looking at: “What are the compelling reasons for someone to work in an organization beyond pay and benefits?”

Many HR leaders advise firms to pay close attention to base pay. It’s a rising concern among longtime employees, and a growing number of top talent might leave if base pay doesn’t rise above the modest increases of the past several years. However, once base pay is competitive, all the other factors take on added significance, says Murat Philippe, director of workforce consulting services for Avatar HR Solutions in Chicago.

“We find that salaries and bonuses are definitely part of the equation, and you need to be in the ballpark as far as compensation goes,” Philippe says. “But you don’t have to be the highest payer. You don’t have to be better than 95 percent of the others out there. Then, when you’re in the fair-salary area, you need to look at higher-level ideas, such as your career and development options.”

Many HR consultancies also argue that a stronger employee deal can lead to better company performance and an enhanced bottom line. For its 2012-2013 Global Talent Management and Rewards Study, Towers Watson surveyed 1,605 employers. The study found that organizations that had done the most work developing and executing their employee value proposition achieved superior financial performance over businesses with less-developed ones.

Take Red Frog Events for example. The company has seen wide success after developing a comprehensive vision for its culture. Since its founding in 2007, the company grew from a handful of employees to 80 full-timers, 41 interns and

$50 million in revenue in 2012. The company has roughly 2,000 job applicants per month, Bostrom says, and has been at the top of several “Best Places to Work” lists in Chicago.

When American Express Co., a frequent Fortune magazine “Best Places to Work” winner, recently looked to strengthen its employment deal, it turned to a survey of employees that identified key factors employees felt made the company a top place to work. “The two things we found that were most important were challenging work and advancement opportunities, and they were looking to work in a manner where they could use their creativity,” says Cameron Batten, the company’s global director of recruitment, marketing and branding.

With that in mind, the company rolled out a series of videos, all available on YouTube, which featured American Express employees. The clear message: American Express is looking for creative leaders focused on meeting the company’s mission, “to serve people and inspire extraordinary lives.”

Today, the company has 98 employee videos. Two years ago there were none. As a result, the company doubled its traffic from recruits over various online channels, Batten says. At the same time, the company offers an array of robust benefit options and work-life balance options. “The way we look at it is: The war for talent is fierce and that talent helps you bring in the bottom line,” he says.

Like American Express, many companies looking to shore up their employment deal first turn to a frank survey of employees. While shoring up an employee value proposition can seem relatively straightforward on paper, the results from employee surveys are often where vision meets a hard reality.

Philippe strongly advised the firm to loosen up its shift policies, and pointed to the high cost of replacing burned-out employees. The client didn’t budge. “It was just like pulling teeth to get the senior manager and leader there to see that this wasn’t an effective way of running your business,” Philippe says.

Still, Towers Watson’s Sejen says companies that want to do a better job with their employment deal need not be intimidated.

“To get the returns we’re talking about, meaning better financial performance and fewer attraction and retention issues, you don’t have to do it all,” she says. “What we’ve found is that even just starting down the path … helps you start realizing better outcomes.”

Meg McSherry Breslin is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on December 17, 2012August 3, 2018

DuPont Sees Bottom-Line Boost After Retooling Its Rewards

DuPont Co.’s Washington Works plant in West Virginia wanted to create a world-class employee-recognition system to enhance engagement with its 1,650 employees.

Leaders at the plant, which manufactures polymer products primarily for the automotive and construction industries, say that goal was quickly attained. Within nine months of the program launch last March, 95 percent of the Washington Works employees were using the online system, with about 2,600 individual recognitions per month.

Points are also given when sitewide objectives and goals are achieved. Since the program started with the help of Achievers Corp., a San Francisco-based employee-recognition firm, the site has attained a safety milestone: more than 400 days without an event-related injury.

The early results of the program have been encouraging, giving plant leaders hope that the recognition system, along with a host of other plant initiatives, will have a measurable effect on the company’s overall business objectives.

A recent report from Bersin & Associates, a membership-based human resources research and advisory firm in Oakland, California, underscores DuPont’s experience. The firm found that companies that excel at employee recognition are 12 times more likely to generate strong business results than their peers.

As part of that report, Bersin surveyed employees across 261 companies. In conjunction with the research, the consultancy also released its Employee Recognition Maturity Model, which allows companies to strategically assess their employee-recognition programs and take the detailed steps needed to revamp them.

Stacia Sherman Garr, a principal analyst for Bersin and the report’s author, says companies often underestimate just how much a strong recognition program can accomplish. She says the best programs boost engagement, reduce turnover “and ultimately drive business performance.”

Still, Garr says many companies’ programs remain poorly designed and are put together with little thought for how the rewards tie into business goals. For instance, many firms still reward employees for years of service, yet do little to recognize outstanding work on special projects or teams that have clearly boosted company value or customer satisfaction.

Furthermore, companies should ensure employees understand what the company values and where their work attention should be directed. “If you don’t have a sense for what you’re trying to drive, it’s almost impossible to drive what you’re trying to impact,” Garr says.

Similarly, a 2011 study from WorldatWork, a Scottsdale, Arizona-based human resources association, found that 34 percent of companies are now recognizing employees for a very specific set of behaviors that they’re trying to drive, up 9 percentage points from 2008.

“Organizations felt that because of what’s going on with the economy, they really need to direct employees in a very specific way and reward them, especially since there’s not been a lot of merit increases available,” says Rose Stanley, work-life practice leader at WorldatWork.

Garr says many more of Bersin’s members are focused on improving their recognition strategy, particularly by introducing user-friendly online programs that allow peers and supervisors to single out admirable work. A recent Bersin webcast on redesigning rewards programs generated 1,000 participants, she says.

“In general, we used to be less of a sharing culture,” Garr says. “It was more about the CEO going up there to give a single award or a gold watch. That has really changed. As part of this overall trend, we’re seeing a lot more input from employees at all levels. People want to engage with their colleagues, they want to get coaching and feedback, and they truly want to get recognition when they’ve done great work.”

At DuPont, the recognitions are public acknowledgements of a job well done and can add up to points that employees apply toward a range of prizes and gifts, such as $25 gift cards or adventure trips for the top performers. The recognitions come from senior managers and direct supervisors as well as peers.

WorldatWork’s Stanley says much of the renewed focus on reward and recognition is also about retaining key employees.

“Everybody is talking about keeping key talent. Especially as the economy starts to pick up, they know there’s going to be a surge in people looking for new employment,” Stanley says. “Using these programs becomes a key way to keeping them more engaged, and thus keeping them.”

Meg McSherry Breslin is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on December 17, 2012August 3, 2018

Five Ways to Revamp Your Rewards System

Based on interviews with Achievers, the San Francisco-based rewards and recognition company that advised the DuPont Co. Washington Works plant with its new program, and insights from other top consultants, here are five important considerations when crafting rewards and recognition plans:

1. Ensure that your rewards tie directly to your business objectives. “It’s critical to align employee interests and company interests so it’s a win-win for everyone,” says Razor Suleman, founder and chairman of Achievers. “Identify what behaviors positively impact the business, and design your recognition program to recognize and reward them. It will drive repeat positive behavior. … It also helps employees understand how their actions affect the big picture, which also helps make their jobs more meaningful.”

2. Include peer-to-peer recognitions. A recent study from WorldatWork, a Scottsdale, Arizona-based human resources association, found 43 percent of organizations today have some kind of peer-to-peer recognition program. “It’s the third highest form of recognition now,” says Rose Stanley, work-life practice leader at WorldatWork. “It’s the silver bullet of any recognition program,” Suleman says. “This creates a democratic system and builds a culture where all employees are appreciated and feel valued for their work every day. When you empower people with a vote to recognize who is doing a great job, driving results or going above and beyond, they take it seriously.”

3. Implement user-friendly software, allowing managers and employees to actively engage in a recognition program without a lot of extra time. One glaring finding from a recent study from HR research and advisory firm Bersin & Associates was the importance of a solid technology program for implementing the rewards system. “We went into this [research] knowing that technology was important, but what was really surprising was just how important it was,” said Stacia Sherman Garr, a principal analyst for the firm. “We’ve found that one of the top reasons employees don’t recognize each other is it’s not always easy to do.”

4. First focus on senior leaders buying into the new goals of your recognition program. If senior management doesn’t believe in the importance of rewards and recognition to drive business objectives, the message won’t trickle down through the organization in a very effective way, Garr says. “We help [companies] understand that the first focus should always be on the senior leaders,” she says.

5. Give employees a nice range of rewards to cash in on. Rather than just a gift card to Starbucks, let them pick what they want from a catalog.

Meg McSherry Breslin is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on December 6, 2012August 3, 2018

Two-Tiered Pay Scale for Autoworkers Raises Debate

In most of his 32-year career as a Michigan autoworker and union leader, Frank Hammer never imagined the United Auto Workers agreeing to major concessions when it came to core principles: equal pay for equal work, job security and generous pensions.

But an erosion of those key values has arrived and at a rapid pace over the past several years: Enter a two-tiered salary system. Beginning in 2007, the UAW has drafted contracts with the Detroit Three automakers aimed at rebuilding a struggling American auto industry and preventing thousands of American jobs from moving overseas. One of the key changes in the contracts allowed for a two-tiered salary system, letting entry-level workers earn far less than traditional workers while also forgoing pensions and more generous health plans.

As a result, roughly 13 percent of General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group hourly workers, or about 15,000 employees, are now in those lower-paid positions, shows a recent study from the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Before the UAW agreed to the new salary structure, the average worker cost GM about $79 per hour in wages and benefits. Today, that figure is down to $58, largely because of the growing number of entry-level positions coming into the system, says Kristin Dziczek, a director at the Center for Automotive Research. Typical entry -level workers earn about $19 per hour, with workers in warehousing and distribution positions making less than $15 per hour, she says.

The new salary structure has taken a toll on all autoworkers, undermining the ability of workers to live a decent wage and quality of life, says Hammer, who retired in 2006 and is now a leader of The Autoworker Caravan, a Michigan-based advocacy group formed in 2008 for unionized autoworkers.

“The morale of workers in the plants is not at all what it used to be,” Hammer says. “You face situations where a mother and son can be working on two different sides of the assembly line doing the same job, but one is working at half the wage of the other.”

But Dziczek says many new autoworkers are happy to take the jobs, even at drastically lower salaries, because the depressed job market offers them few other opportunities.

“Traditional workers really feel these [new] people have gotten a raw deal,” she says, “but entry-level workers are looking at it differently, figuring, ‘If I stick around long enough, I’ll get the wage you got.’ They understand the bargain.”

GM spokesman Bill Grotz says the contract negotiated in 2007 has resulted in about 9 percent of the automaker’s current workforce being entry level, and it’s working well. “Overall, it was a pretty innovative labor agreement. … It helped us stay competitive, open more plants and provide more opportunities for more jobs,” he says.

Art Schwartz was GM’s general director of labor relations from 1985 through 2009. Now a retired consultant, he says the criticism of entry-level positions is misplaced, given that the jobs are still very attractive to job seekers. Furthermore, the industry—faced with globalization—had few other options for survival.

“These are still good jobs. They still pay benefits,” Schwartz says. “The health care is extremely good. … We’re talking about an industry that’s competing very hard in a global marketplace, where they tend to have a labor-cost advantage. This is one way of trying to overcome it without damaging anybody who’s already there.”

Some analysts say the union’s concessions may have a lasting effect, not just for the auto industry but for the power and integrity of unions across many fields.

Dziczek says the new salary structure would have been unheard of only a few years before, but the union and automakers had to take dramatic action to save U.S. jobs.

“They all had to do something because labor costs were so out of whack with other competitors in this market,” Dziczek says. The union “knew that a total wage concession was unlikely to ratify so this was one way of getting labor costs down without taking money out of the pockets of the people who were voting on the agreement.”

Dzicek’s recent analysis projects a steady climb in entry-level positions over the next several years. She predicts that by 2015, 35 percent of Chrysler’s workforce will be entry level, with GM at about 23 percent and Ford at 15 percent.

In the meantime, Hammer expects opposition from autoworkers to continue, as the pay disparities become more obvious over time.

“I think there’s certainly sentiments out there that people are just glad that they’re working,” Hammer says. “But it’s becoming extremely more difficult to sustain a normal quality of life with these jobs.”

Meg McSherry Breslin is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.


 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress