Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Patrick Tong

Posted on August 21, 2023February 16, 2024

10 Best Practices for Employee Surveys

Painting of a hand filling out a survey on a tablet

Summary:

  • Employee surveys are useful for judging general sentiment across a workforce.

  • Positive responses should not always be taken at face value – conducting follow-up discussions can provide valuable context. 

  • Follow through with specific action plans using an employee engagement platform. 


Job satisfaction is currently at its highest. A survey from The Conference Board found that competitive pay plays a part in it, but employee retention is also attributed to experience and culture. While such results are notable and perceived to be primarily positive, it isn’t easy to generalize that the findings apply to every organization. 

For instance, survey findings show that a hybrid workforce is more satisfied than fully remote or on-site employees. But if you run an hourly workforce for a retail store, hotel chain, or healthcare facility, offering remote work is obviously out of the question. Does this mean that you’re doomed to have an unsatisfied team? Definitely not. The key here is optimizing employee experience by making their jobs easier and more fulfilling. Conducting surveys helps you get this done. 

Employee surveys shed light on employee satisfaction, pain points, and performance issues. Here are 10 best practices to get valuable insights from your employee surveys. 

1. Take time to build the groundwork.

If you want to make the most of employee surveys, you need to take time to plan them out.  

First, you need to determine why you’re doing one. Doing one annually “just because” is not a good enough reason. If you’re conducting a survey just for the sake of it, you’re wasting resources, getting unreliable or skewed answers, and potentially risking low participation rates. 

Before you roll out an employee survey program, here are things you need to plan for:

  • The reason for doing the survey. There are several reasons why organizations do employee surveys. Commonly, it’s a way to assess developments from the last poll, measure employee engagement, and investigate what’s causing productivity dips. Whatever the reason, you need to be clear about what you’re trying to measure, as it will set the direction for the entire process and the correct type of survey.
  • The timeline for the survey. When do you plan to conduct the survey, and what is the timeframe for which you will gather and validate the responses?
  • The participants of the survey. Who needs to answer the survey? Will it be conducted across the board, or will only selected staff members need to respond? Again, the reason for the survey will help determine this. If it’s an employee engagement survey, you should probably distribute it across your entire organization. But if it’s to gauge interest in something specific, let’s say a new tip pooling policy, it might make sene to only ask frontline team members to participate and not managers.
  • The set of questions to use. Questions should align with what you’re trying to measure. If you’re assessing progress from the previous survey results, using the same set of questions might make sense. However, it’s important to still look at that questionnaire and weed out any unnecessary items or add more to help with your evaluation.
  • Implementation of findings. Who will implement programs or changes as warranted by the survey results? Follow-through is crucial for every type of employee survey. Yes, human resources has a huge role to play in this, but managers are at the forefront of making sure that initiatives are implemented. It’s vital that results are turned into initiatives and programs that improves business outcomes and workplace culture. 

2. Time it well.

The best time to conduct an employee survey depends on several factors. But as a general rule of thumb, it should be avoided during public holidays or busy seasons. 

If you’re trying to benchmark or see progress, you can schedule employee surveys at regular intervals, say once per quarter. For instance, if the survey aims to improve employee engagement levels, regular check-ins following the initial study will be good for tracking progress and changing current programs to improve results. 

It may also be a good idea to conduct surveys at significant employment milestones, such as while onboarding, during performance reviews, before and after a promotion, or during offboarding. 

If a company is about to undergo a significant change, consider conducting surveys before and after this restructuring as well; this will help you gauge how perceptions and sentiments change during a major shift.  

3. Formulate the right questions.

If you want your employee surveys to uncover the true state of what you’re trying to measure, you must ask the right questions. While it seems obvious, many organizations tend to stumble at this part because wording survey questions can be trickier than it looks.  

Remember that each person or respondent has some form of bias. Survey questions must be carefully worded to get as specific and objective answers as possible.  

Here are some tips: 

  • Use neutral wording. Experts at HBR advise using neutral terms instead of words that can have strong associations. So, for instance, terms like strong or taking long strides may have associations with male leaders, which can result in higher rankings of male leaders compared to female leaders.

Suppose you want to measure how your managers tackle complicated issues at work. In that case, it may be best to phrase the question “Does your manager discuss complex issues with precision and clarity?” instead of “Does your manager have a strong grasp of complex problems?”. Both may have the same meaning, but the former sounds more specific and neutral.

  • Keep questions focused on a single item. While it’s easy to clump related items together, it’s best to keep things separate so that it’s easier for respondents. For instance, you wanted to measure how employees perceive their salary and benefits. While both are part of your compensation package, it’s best to create two separate questions for them because employees may have different perspectives on the two. Employees may be satisfied with their pay but may not be too happy with their leave benefits.
  • Use rating scales and multiple-choice questions. These types of questions are good at getting specific answers and engaging respondents. Ensure that each question flows from one to the next and doesn’t jump from one topic to another. For instance, you want to ensure that questions about work responsibilities and tasks are grouped together while questions about leadership are also categorized differently.
  • Use some open-ended questions. Context is important when processing survey results, and open-ended questions can help. Such questions allow respondents to provide answers in their own words, enabling them to explain their thoughts and responses better. Two open-ended questions per 15 ranking or scale-type survey questions is a common practice for employee surveys.  
  • Keep it short. If you want a high response rate, keep your surveys concise. Respondents are likelier to engage with the questions if they are direct and varied.

Also read: A complete guide to employee engagement for shift-based work

4. Develop a communication plan

Proper communication is critical if you intend to achieve high response rates for your employee surveys. Think of it like a marketing plan, but this time, your employees are your target audience. You need to get their buy-in and make them see what’s in it for them. Communicate the goal of the survey in a way that highlights how the end result will benefit them.  

Aside from discussing goals and objectives, you also need to inform them of the survey process—when the survey will take place and how it will be conducted. 

Realize that communication is not just a one-off email announcement. A best practice is to communicate the survey through different channels, such as a series of well-scheduled email messages, face-to-face announcements by team leads, and push notifications via an employee app if you have it. Equip managers to also answer questions regarding the survey, if needed.  

5. Use data to identify critical issues

Maximize your data and use it to identify gaps and spot low-lying opportunities. 

For instance, does your time and attendance data indicate an increase in no-shows or tardiness? Using this indicator, you can frame your surveys to identify what’s causing the issue. Is this a logistical hitch, or is an underlying management problem causing it? You can find possible answers from your data, such as employee schedules being sent out frequently late. You can use your survey to confirm if that’s the case or uncover any other reason. 

Webinar: Tackling Critical Workplace Issues with SHRM

Numbers don’t lie. Your data can give you insights into current issues, and you can tailor your surveys to get to the bottom of these hiccups. On the other hand, data can also tell you what your organization is doing right, and the survey can help you identify different ways to reinforce that.  

6. Involve employees in survey design

Invite a small group of employees to do a test run of the survey. They can provide feedback on the questions and how it was conducted. This way, you can spot vague questions, improve unclear areas or statements, and remove or add more questions necessary. This extra step ensures that your survey will yield valuable results. 

7. Address confidentiality concerns

People tend to give honest feedback when they know that responses are confidential, especially on questions about critical matters. Disclose how the answers are collected and clarify if the survey is fully confidential or if they have the option to disclose their identity or not. 

8. Validate your findings.

Employee survey results should not be taken at face value. After collecting feedback, it’s best to validate your findings. Correlate answers with other relevant information you have, such as sales metrics and attrition rates. 

Sometimes survey data might seem optimistic, but there are cases where it’s indicative of another issue. For instance, while a team may rate their manager highly, this could be because the manager does not hold staff accountable for productivity or workplace professionalism. 

If anything is unclear, don’t stop until you get to the bottom of it. If answers are inconclusive, you can conduct a follow-up study. A focused discussion among a small group of employees can provide a clearer picture of what’s happening.  

9. Follow-through.

The point of conducting surveys is to improve your operations by understanding employee sentiment. What sets successful organizations apart is how they utilize survey results to optimize their workforce management and improve their work environment. 

Make sure to communicate survey results to the respondents. You can share high-level findings with everyone and be open to clarifications should some employees want to learn more. If necessary, develop action plans for specific employees, or outline a company-wide strategic initiative for all your managers. Doing either or both of these things promotes transparency, makes employees feel heard, and ensures appropriate action is taken. 

10. Use the right survey tools

An employee engagement platform is sometimes necessary to distribute surveys and organize responses across your workforce. 

The right platform helps in two ways. For one, you need to have an efficient way to distribute surveys and record responses in a single system that houses all of these so you can analyze them later on. 

The other important aspect is accessibility. Make it convenient for employees to access surveys and respond. It’s advisable to allow employees to answer surveys via their mobile devices as this gives them flexibility on when to answer the survey. 

It’s good to consider what avenues are actually accessible for your staff. Do they really have the time or desire to download a new app to complete surveys? This might be more work for them. Think about how to incorporate surveys into their day-to-day tools – perhaps via a time clock app or a self-service app that houses things they routinely access, such as their schedule, time off balances, and paystubs. 

Distributing surveys through regularly accessed channels is critical for a good survey response rate. This also keeps things as unintrusive as possible. Employees are busy getting things done; they don’t have time to answer survey questions on a clunky, one-use platform.

If a company is about to undergo a significant change, consider conducting surveys before and after this restructuring as well; this will help you gauge how perceptions and sentiments change during a major shift. 

Make your surveys a part of a comprehensive feedback system.

Feedback should go beyond annual employee surveys. There are issues you can address more spontaneously if you gather feedback more quickly and frequently. 

An excellent example of this is allowing your employees to rate their shifts in real-time, right after their shift, directly from a time clock. This method helps you quickly identify top-of-mind problems for your staff. 

The key here is a sound feedback system that integrates short- and long-term feedback processes. Workforce.com, for instance, has an employee engagement system that allows you to collect regular data from shift feedback and irregular data from one-off pulse surveys. A system like this helps you navigate through responses and turn them into action plans for maintaining employee happiness, improving company culture, and increasing profitability. 

See it in action and book a call today. 

Interested in more ways to engage your employees but tired of reading? Check out our webinar below featuring Laura Timbrook, an NBC-HWC, CHC, and AADP certified coach and podcaster, where she covers actionable solutions for managing things like absenteeism and turnover.

Webinar: How to Drive Engagement for Hourly Workers

Posted on September 18, 2003July 10, 2018

What Worked and What Didn’t with Employee Survey Programs

Integrating a survey with organizational transformation
    An international high-technology firm with operations in more than 60countries positioned the survey process as an integral element of itsorganizational transformation. Survey branding was integrated with the company’songoing change initiatives and made use of distinctive art and tag linesassociated with this process. The survey results were summarized to provideindex scores for each of the company’s corporate values. Response rates werehigher than targeted, and survey results were used to refine and support changeinitiatives.


The survey census day
    A retail banking organization had been conducting employee surveys for morethan 10 years, but response rates had sharply declined. An extensive process forpre-survey communication was developed and included posters, Q&A documents,and regular countdown messages through team briefings and company newsletters. A”survey census” day was scheduled to provide a focal point, but thedata-collection window extended over two and a half weeks. The bank achieved asignificant increase in the survey response rate and had one of the highestrates observed for retail banking.


The survey champion network
    A major retailer conducted a company-wide survey that was administered by thecentral HR function. Questionnaires were shipped to stores and deposited,unannounced, in employee break rooms. Return rates were predictably low. For thenext survey, a champion network was created, with representation from employeesand middle management. Regular meetings were held to organize administration andprovide mutual support. An employee representative was appointed for each storeto assist in administration and to encourage employees to respond. The returnrates were greater than expected and increased by 15 percentage points over theprevious year.


Improving the fit with culture
    An organization with manufacturing operations in the United States and Europeconducted its first company-wide survey using a standard “cultural audit.”However, employees complained that the instrument didn’t seem to “fit” thecompany or adequately address the issues of greatest concern. Participationrates were low. A new survey was designed using input from employee focus groupsthat better reflected the culture of the company. The new survey achieved asignificantly higher response rate, and the survey follow-up actions wereuniversally viewed as more effective.


Demonstrating senior management commitment
    A corporate bank had established a company-wide objective to improve employeemorale and to become an “employer of choice.” Despite an extendeddata-collection window, survey response rates were disappointing and anecdotalevidence indicated that employees had become skeptical about the follow-upprocess.


For its next survey, the bank limited the number of issues for follow-upaction and assigned an executive sponsor to each area. These areas werecommunicated to employees along with the name and photograph of the executivesponsor. For the subsequent survey, return rates increased significantly andemployees indicated that they were more confident that follow-up actions wouldbe taken.


The dangers of a false deadline
    A U.S. manufacturing company with international operations wanted to presentsurvey results at a senior management conference that was scheduled in twomonths’ time. That allowed just eight weeks to design, translate, andadminister the survey in more than 30 countries. Local management had littleinvolvement in developing the survey process and was instructed to “make surethe questionnaires are administered and returned on time.”


For many countries, the timing was impractical, with data collectionscheduled during periods of peak sales activity or plant-maintenance shutdowns.Somewhat draconian methods were introduced to induce participation, but themajority of employees did not respond. Few actions were taken in response tosurvey results. In a subsequent survey, planning was begun eight months prior toadministration and a survey-coordinator network was established. Roles andresponsibilities were agreed on, and follow-up expectations were communicated tomanagers. Response rates improved.


An appeal to charity
   A UK retail bank wished to increase survey response rates and offered acharitable donation for each completed questionnaire. Simultaneously with thiscompany-wide survey, a second survey was conducted with a sample of employees–butwith no promise of a charitable donation. The response rates were identical forboth surveys. The company continued to support charities, but concluded thatoffering a charitable donation as an incentive did not affect response rates.


Linking survey results to bonus
    An insurance company linked bonuses for employees and managers to balancedscorecard objectives, one of which was “people satisfaction,” as measured inthe employee survey. In other words, bonuses were based, in part, on howfavorably employees responded to the survey questions. Return rates wereacceptable but low. Written responses to open-ended questions indicated thatemployees felt pressured to report high levels of morale. The bonus linkage wasdropped from subsequent surveys, and much to the surprise of management, returnrates and satisfaction levels increased.


Timing is everything
    An international accounting firm believed that two weeks was a sufficientamount of time for data collection. They also believed that response rates wouldbe unaffected by fluctuations in the business cycle. Data collection wasscheduled to immediately follow the income tax filing deadline. After two weeksof administration, the response rate was abysmally low, and data collection hadto be extended for an additional four weeks. Subsequent surveys were scheduledto avoid the tax season.


Starting a dialogue
    A specialty chemical company with operations in more than 30 countries wasdisappointed with the level of participation in its first company-wide survey.Management was convinced that future response rates could be improved by takingaction on the current survey results and by monitoring the effectiveness offollow-up. Each company location was required to prepare regular reports onfollow-up actions.


    Adopting the title of the survey, these reports became known as “Dialogue”reports. The Dialogue reports were communicated to regional management andbecame a regular part of the briefing packs that were routinely prepared forvisits by the company’s executive team. As hoped, the response ratessignificantly increased for subsequent surveys.


Workforce Online, February 2003 — Register Now!


 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress