Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Rick Bell

Posted on April 7, 2014June 20, 2018

The Last Word: Tossed Salad Insults

It was lunchtime. I had just scored a burrito the size of my forearm from my favorite taco shop and got on the elevator to the 12th floor when I was joined by three women. One of them hit the button for the seventh floor, which I think is home to an insurance company’s administrative offices. A fourth woman entered as the doors closed, also bound for the seventh floor.

“What’cha got there?” a member of the trio asked their late-arriving colleague. The smell of warm burgers and hot fries wafted across the car just as I noticed their McDonald’s bags; no such odor drifted up from the fourth woman’s meal.

“I got a salad,” she offered with a slight sigh in a low, monotone reply. Apparently she was steeling herself for the impending response that she knew was coming.

“A salad?!” barked the trio’s expert in haute cuisine. “Whaddaya want with rabbit food? You tryin’ to lose weight? You got yourself a man now?”

“I’m just watching what I eat,” the lone girl replied somewhat sheepishly — I guess because she chose to nibble on veggies rather than a No. 6 combo from Mickey D’s.

A rapid-fire Q-and-A ensued regarding booty size and their appeal as boy magnets, prompting me to ponder the grilling I’d get if they knew I substituted quinoa for rice on my burrito. But rather than bailing on this awkward elevator trip, I tuned out the chatter on fresh greens, posteriors and boyfriends until the door slid open at seven. As they filed out, I felt the sense of relief you get at the grocery store after slipping past one spouse dressing down the other for grabbing the wrong type of laundry detergent: “I told you perfume-free! Can’t you remember those two words?”

Now, I know friends razz each other. We’d be a boring lot indeed if we didn’t occasionally zing each other over our favorite music or the growing stack of dirty Tupperware on our desks.

Whether it’s a cross-country call from a colleague gloating about the weather, teasing someone on a bad hair day or questioning a repetitive lunch choice, ribbing can build enduring workplace relationships.

We quickly learn colleagues’ foibles and favorites; some have taken those observations and lifted needling to high art. Entire sitcoms are based on workplace digs, and let’s face it, no matter how uptight we get, jokes and laughs help loosen up an all-too-stressed-out workplace.

But the line between pushing the envelope and pushing someone’s buttons can be paper-thin. And crossing the boundary into bully territory is just around the bend from that.

Perhaps I’m taking the elevator banter a little more personally than I should, but I’ve been there. Several years ago I ballooned up to being 40 pounds overweight because of poor food choices and a lack of exercise, leading to an assortment of aches, pains and stress. That kind of bulk isn’t easy to lose either.

Doing a 360-degree about-face with your eating habits is an incredibly difficult task, especially at lunch. Making the choice is one thing, but following through and maintaining a dietary lifestyle turnaround — especially when it’s so much simpler to chow down on fast food at your desk — is an entirely different story.

Perhaps worse, according to a recent study from GrubHub, 40 percent of employees admit to occasionally skipping lunch because of heavy workloads; others don’t do themselves any favors, the study adds, by prioritizing work over nutrition and postponing their meal until late in the afternoon.

Yet the majority of people who do eat lunch can get mighty sensitive when their choice of foods and eating habits is called into question. I get defensive, and judging by her immediate reaction, I suspect the woman on the elevator did, too.

Food choices can be a sense of ethnic and personal pride. Laugh at my homemade dumplings heating up in the microwave and you’re trampling my heritage. Crack wise about my salad and you’re assaulting my personal preference to take a stab at a healthier lifestyle.

I’ve harped often enough in this column about the value of managers encouraging healthy, fit employees. There’s no one-size-fits-all solution. But this time I’ll take it a step further: Kidding a colleague who opts for a salad over a sloppy joe — even if it’s all in good-natured fun — is still in bad taste.

Posted on March 26, 2014November 14, 2019

SAP Acquires Contingent Staffing Tech Firm Fieldglass

employee communication co-worker

German tech firm SAP announced plans to acquire contingent staffing software maker Fieldglass. Terms of the deal, which is scheduled to close in the second quarter, were not disclosed.

Fieldglass’ cloud-based vendor management system meets the growing demand among employers to manage flexible workforces that can be quickly engaged and on-boarded to support rapidly changing business and customer needs, according to an SAP release announcing the March 26 deal.

Combined with the collaborative, network-based procurement capabilities of Ariba and the human resources expertise of SuccessFactors, the acquisition uniquely positions SAP to deliver a platform for businesses to manage their entire workforce — both temporary and permanent staff — from initial recruiting and on-boarding to ongoing development, performance management, retention and retirement, SAP said.

The combination of Fieldglass’ market-leading VMS solution with SAP promises to transform workforce management. It will enable a flexible and comprehensive approach to managing the entire workforce and life cycle, beyond the traditional focus on the employee record that characterizes many systems today, SAP said.

Contingent labor and statement-of-work services is a $3.3 trillion, high-growth market according to industry analyst estimates.

Fieldglass will continue to build out its global team and operations and retain its identity and continue to operate independently as an SAP company in its cloud line, according to a press release.

Posted on December 9, 2013June 29, 2023

Infosys BPO: Optimas Gold Winner for Business Impact

Infosys BPO faced a problem familiar to many companies in recent years that were shaking off the doldrums of the Great Recession.

There was a spike in work for the Bangalore, India-based business process outsourcing company, which meant that there was an urgent need to fill newly created positions.

But with competitors facing the same situation, retaining its workforce was a challenge as other companies swooped in to poach talent from the Infosys ranks.

Attrition rates in India soared above 40 percent with Infosys seeing similar figures. Despite the Infosys mantra of “Careers for Life,” high-potential employees were leaving for jobs with better compensation. Its uptick in business was in danger of being lost if Infosys couldn’t identify and keep its workforce.

“Employers in India consistently cite retention of high-performing, high-potential employees as a top HR and business concern,” said Raghavendra K, Head HRD. “Good talent with ability in India is aspirational and therefore harder to retain given the need to remain cost-competitive.”

Rather than pursue a similar strategy of poaching the competition to bolster its workforce, leaders at Infosys BPO, which is a subsidiary of Infosys Ltd., renewed its push for an innovative rewards program to foster retention as well as limit the cost of hiring new employees.

Out of this push, an iSTAR was born.

“The iSTAR award has a strong focus on recognition of high potentials in the employee’s peer group and managers, especially amongst the senior management,” Raghavendra K said in an email. “ISTAR effectively couples recognition to other total rewards elements such as enhanced career development and advancement opportunities, communication, even a cash incentive to reward and recognize critical talent.”

The program was launched in 2012, and company officials noticed an immediate effect on attrition levels and employee morale. The initiative was folded into Infosys’ total value proposition. More importantly, Infosys is committed to the program’s continuation. And like any good program, leaders want to make it better.

While the program is aimed at employee development and promotion, it clearly revealed that retention was higher among its high-potential workers. Attrition levels among iSTAR awardees were 44 percent lower than the rest of the Infosys population. With the drop in attrition, leaders also realized a cost savings from reduced turnover and cost per hire.

“Retaining high-potential employees is not just about more pay; it’s more about a mutual give-and-take relationship with the employer,” Raghavendra K said. “For a high-potential employee in India, career advancement and development opportunities, respect and empowerment at the workplace, reward and especially recognition as well as appreciation are high motivators.”

For launching its iSTAR program and the success in retaining its high-potential employees, Infosys BPO is the gold Optimas Award winner for Business Impact.

Rick Bell is Workforce's managing editor. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Bell on Twitter at @RickBell123.

Posted on August 11, 2013June 29, 2023

2013 Game Changer: Matthew West

Many experienced employees know their role and responsibilities. But ask them to define it? That’s when the blank looks and shrugs of “I just do what I do” begin.

Enter Matthew West. The chief talent officer literally wrote the plan/do/review book at pharmaceutical advertising firm McCann Regan Campbell Ward, defining all systems and tracking the process from a staffer’s first inkling all the way to a published piece. The process wasn’t merely an exercise searching for a formula. Rather, West, 37, ultimately compiled a comprehensive training program so new employees could quickly assimilate into the company.

Even before his promotion to chief talent officer six years ago, West created training and mentoring programs as well as career tracks with defined milestones. Because of his time invested in training and mentoring programs, the company can commit to hiring from within—a big cost-saver on the open talent markets.

More than supplying and nurturing the company’s talent pipeline, “Mr. West is the keeper of our corporate DNA,” says Nelson Hunter, chief financial officer.

Rick Bell is Workforce's managing editor. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Bell on Twitter at @RickBell123.

Posted on March 15, 2013August 6, 2018

Marissa Mayer, the Boss Who Has to Hire

Ed Frauenheim is on assignment.

Your new boss is hands-on. The kind of boss who wants to leave an imprint on everything, from the contingent budget to internal communications to the brand of coffee in the break room. There’s nothing the new boss isn’t touching even though it’s almost a year into the job.

Oh, and that new position you’re ready to pull the trigger on filling? Your candidate is meeting the new boss later today. Like the coffee and the contingents, it’s required that all potential hires meet the chief.

Still, it’s a slam dunk. Your choice is a perfect fit. Then why is there this nagging feeling in the pit of your stomach that you’ll be back to square one tomorrow morning?

Reuters recently posted a story updating the hiring policies that Marissa Mayer implemented at Yahoo last year. Like that new boss of yours, she signs off on all new hires.

Not surprisingly, some insiders at the company are grousing that, with her hands-on approach, perfectly good candidates are being tossed aside or they lose patience and walk because of interminable delays. From the story:

Another Google practice that Mayer has adopted at Yahoo is to personally review and sign off on every hire, which inevitably slows down recruiting.

Job applicants often go through the interview process, then “wait and wait,” said one executive who recently left Yahoo. “One person we wanted waited eight weeks, then they inevitably got another offer.”

Frustrating for sure, but who among us has gone through a series of interviews and then hired without meeting The Office El Jefe? My guess is not many. And delays? Whether it was a temporary hiring freeze, sudden budget constraints or a supervisor who kept putting off a decision, most of us have played that waiting game.

Before I was hired, I met with every publisher I ever worked for. The editors did the legwork, but then it was time to meet the boss. Some meetings were mere formalities; others were two hours of sheer torture. One publisher even asked me to lift up the lapel on my jacket to see if I was wearing a communist pin underneath. I think he was serious.

But that was his prerogative. To meet with me, I mean, not seek out my political affiliation.

Bosses should play a big role in hiring their next employee. It’s their company. And don’t tell me they’re too busy. Abe Lincoln signed off on virtually every federal hire after his inauguration. OK, it was the days of patronage and he owed a lot of favors, but still … “Let’s see, Georgia just seceded from the Union, Fort Sumter’s under siege, relations with England and France are sketchy at best … oh yeah, time to meet the guy who wants to be the pension office clerk.”

Mayer declared last year that she would be hands-on with her hiring. Despite the kvetching by some, it was no hollow promise. Not even a year into her tenure as Yahoo CEO, she’s realigned the C-suite with several big-name shakeups, named HR outsider Jacqueline Reses as her vice president of people and development, and implemented a telecommuting ban. Maybe there’s some merit to complaints about methodology but speed doesn’t appear to be an issue with her assault on the company’s personnel problems.

Mayer’s goal to be recruiter-in-chief is one more phase in a high-profile battle to save Yahoo. It’s one she appears determined to win.

Rick Bell is Workforce’s managing editor. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on February 27, 2013August 3, 2018

Work, Cancer and Us

It was about 20 years ago when I read a compelling series of stories by a San Diego reporter. The articles, which ultimately garnered national recognition for the writer and the newspaper, didn’t rely on traditional hot-button topics such as corruption or scandal in public education—this particular scribe’s daily beat.

No, these stories were of a much more personal nature. Drew Silvern chronicled the grim, unfair reality of being a 34-year-old diagnosed with brain cancer. During the next three years, Silvern pulled no punches as he took us on an incredibly private journey of living with a death sentence. Graphic descriptions of medical procedures—the fist-to-gut reaction to being told the cancer had returned—were juxtaposed by deep spiritual musings, thoughts of family and friends and an amazing dedication to his craft.

Silvern died in 1997 at age 37. Amid the emotion stirred by such a story, what struck me as I recently reread his journal was his bravery: Silvern went public when no one would have blamed him for staying private.

His employer, the San Diego Union-Tribune, could have backed away from publishing an explicitly detailed, difficult and, quite frankly, uncomfortable story. But they didn’t.

Cancer at work still reflects the attributes Silvern delivered to his readers nearly two decades ago. Though communications and acceptance have improved, cancer is an uncomfortable subject to confront and remains just as difficult to discuss.

Look around your workplace. If you don’t know someone who has been afflicted by cancer, chances are good that your colleague does. In fact, it could be the co-worker sitting next to you.

More than 1.7 million people will be diagnosed with cancer this year in the United States. Nearly half of those people range in age from 19 to 64—the prime ages of our workforce. Cancer costs employers $264 billion annually in health care costs and lost productivity. But the good news is that 90 percent of cancer survivors under 55 years old will return to work within a year of their diagnosis.

I fall into that category. I actually returned to work the day after receiving treatment for skin cancer in 2009. I’ve never spoken publicly about it. It’s personal and I feel like I can handle it on my own. With regular checkups and a very aggressive dermatologist, we’ve kept my cancer in check.

Perhaps my reluctance to discuss it until now is ill-advised, but I suspect I’m not the only one who works in relative silence with cancer. I pondered the ramifications of going public with this information. How will it affect my relationship with colleagues or with employers past, present and future? Will it kill my career growth? Even worse, am I seen as damaged goods?

Then I realized that’s just silly. Silence is not golden. With more cancer survivors in the workplace than ever before, and employers combing every avenue to keep health care costs in check, turning a blind eye is ignorant.

Cancer at work is not going away and has gone national in a big way. Good Morning America‘s Robin Roberts and actress Christina Applegate have publicly shared their battles with cancer. In our cover story, four people also tell their survival stories. You might have one, too.

Fortunately organizations such as the National Business Group on Health and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network also see the importance in addressing it. The groups are teaming on an employer’s guide to cancer care this year.

From employee assistance programs and wellness initiatives to improving your communication techniques, the tool kit aims to help improve employers and managers deal with cancer-related issues in the workplace. It could be the most valuable tool kit your management team ever picked up.

Because we all work with people like Drew Silvern, Robin Roberts and Christina Applegate. And me.

Rick Bell is Workforce’s managing editor. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on February 14, 2013August 6, 2018

Working in Candy Land

Given the dismal state of today’s daily newspapers, there are still two things you can count on anytime you give one a read.

Whether you are in Bend, Bugtussle or Boston, you’re destined to find a Family Circus comic and at least one advice column offering common-sense solutions to every personal malady known to mankind. Some years ago singer-songwriter John Prine’s tune Dear Abby captured our constant kvetching in his classic ode to the now-departed advice columnist:

So listen up buster, and listen up good/

Stop wishin’ for bad luck and knockin’ on wood/

Signed, Dear Abby.

While reading the paper before a recent flight, I came across one such workplace dilemma. Amy Dickinson was asked to solve ‘Candy Bowl Sparks Bitter Office Spat’ in her Ask Amy column. Because I had 15 minutes before my plane boarded but mostly because chocolate and I are lifelong chums, I was curious to read Amy’s remedy for this confectionary controversy.

A husband wrote on behalf of his wife whose co-worker insists on keeping a bowl of chocolates in a common area. The candy proved to be too great a temptation for the woman, and, according to the writer, “has proven detrimental to her ability to keep away excess pounds.” It was signed “PO’d Husband.” Translation: PO’d Husband’s better half can’t keep her hands off the M&M’s and is getting fat.

Mrs. PO’d Husband initially asked the co-worker to put out healthier snacks to no avail. She then went to management with no better result. When that failed, she resorted to a comrades-please-join-me-in-this-battle-of-the-bulge plea that led to a big internecine sugar spat but no retreat by the keeper of the candy bowl.

To which Ask Amy told him to tell his wife that life isn’t like a box of chocolates. In essence …

So listen up buster, and listen up good/

Stop wishin’ for bad luck and tell your wife to practice some self-control.

Normally I side with our wizened newspaper advisers, oh, like every time. But in this case, when it comes down to self-discipline vs. a bowl of chocolates in the office … I must ask Amy to reconsider.

Publicly displayed bowls of sweets may be filled with the best of intentions, but it can take a vat full of self-restraint to keep from eating that second, third or even fourth peanut butter cup. I’ve worked in several offices where I had no choice but to walk past a common counter loaded with treats and snacks. Broccoli and hummus? Nope; we’re talking Chips Ahoy and Hershey’s Kisses. A bag of Oreos was a standing invitation to twist open a cookie and lap up that layer of white filling.

There are days when I am no match for a box of doughnuts slathered in an icy glaze. And if PO’d Husband is correct, I am not alone in facing this daily sugar rush of emotions.

Behavioral economics teaches us that the rationality of workers—in this case, a submissive, hypersweetened workforce—has its limits. We may expect workers to walk past free candy, but that’s not always the case. Consider too that diabetes is at epidemic proportions, and employees are so sedentary that they set their phones to remind them to move around.

A plate of apples and oranges next to the candy dish offers a choice, but it won’t solve the chocolate-covered conundrum facing me and Mrs. PO’d Husband. We can’t—and shouldn’t—scrub our workplaces free of all temptations, as Ask Amy puts it. Self-control in this instance indeed is a virtue.

Barring workers—and bosses—who like to treat their colleagues with sweets can sour morale. But reasonable boundaries on goodies at work could be needed. If too many treats are an issue, consider opening the sweets spigot wide during holidays—like Valentine’s Day—and then dial it down to a slow drip the rest of the year.

So to Amy and Abby, your advice is well-taken. But may I suggest a twist on your counsel:

Listen up you columnists, and listen up good/

We’d be more disciplined if only we could.

Rick Bell is Workforce’s managing editor. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on September 1, 2012June 29, 2023

The Last Word: ‘Papa John,’ Can You Spare a Dime for Health Care?

Say what you will about the hype surrounding “Papa John” Schnatter’s claim that health care reform will force him to hike the cost of a pizza by more than a dime.

Whether or not you like his pies, it appears he’s right. And though the full financial effects are still hazy, research suggests health care reform will increase costs for most firms.

In early August, Schnatter, the international pizza chain’s CEO and TV pitchman, told shareholders, “Our best estimate is that Obamacare will cost 11 to 14 cents per pizza” once health care reform fully takes hold in 2014. Obamacare, of course, is the term often used when referring to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, which was upheld with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 verdict earlier this summer.

The company’s strategy, Schnatter added, would be to pass the cost onto consumers to protect the best interests of its shareholders. The current nationwide drought and spiking gas prices are cost-boosting justifications for price hikes that we’ve heard before. But this is the first time since the ruling that a big company has publicly cried cause-and-effect regarding health care reform on its operations and profits.

Politics apparently has joined the menu — at least through November — alongside carmelized onions and fennel as new pizza toppings. Schnatter, a well-known conservative who has hosted fundraisers for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, is taking dead aim at President Barack Obama’s health care reform plan. Yet, whatever the political ploy, Schnatter’s proposed price hike is baked in fact.

The day before Schnatter’s pie-pricing plan was announced, consultancy Mercer released a study that retailers and hospitality employers are facing big cost increases in 2014 because of health care reform. Companies in those particular industries — Papa John’s falls somewhere between — rely on low wages and high volume to prop up profit margins.

More importantly though, companies like Papa John’s will be compelled to change their health plans come New Year’s Day 2014.

According to Mercer’s survey of 1,203 retail and hospitality industry employers, 46 percent said they’ll have to upgrade their plans to meet federal standards extending coverage to employees working at least 30 hours a week. Employers that choose not to offer qualified coverage will be charged $2,000 per full-time employee — those working at least 30 hours a week — starting in 2014.

That would be in the neighborhood of a 3 percent hike in health care cost increases because of the law’s requirements, the Mercer study notes.

While hospitality companies and retailers may be grumbling about the future under their breath, there’s probably a silent cheer among them for Papa John’s defiant stand. Since offshoring pizzas are an unlikely option, Papa John’s will have to pony up one way or another. If Schnatter follows through with his vow to hike a $7.99 pie to $8.12, then so will you, pizza-eater.

But then again, there could be alternatives. And I’m not talking about a GOP win in November. If health care reform has accomplished nothing else, it puts one of business’ biggest, fattest elephants square in the middle of the room. How will you manage health care for your employees?

Several recent studies validate that the vast majority of employers will continue to offer employee health care beyond 2014. Simply put, employer-provided health care is entrenched in the American way of doing business. What that looks like and who pays what portion remains to be seen.

This is where Schnatter and other employers — retail, hospitality or otherwise — can play a crucial role in shaping a truly vital employee benefit.

The September issue of Workforce Management explores several health care delivery methods with the potential to curb employer costs and still provide quality coverage. Some, like value-based insurance design and direct primary care, could be the wave of the future. Workplace clinics, which have existed for decades, are undergoing a huge renovation.

If politics is Papa John’s newest pizza ingredient, then working to provide better health care should be baked into the recipe.

Rick Bell is Workforce’s managing editor. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management, September 2012, p. 34 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 28, 2012August 7, 2018

The Last Word: Health Care Reform’s Hurry-Up Is Just Beginning

Anticipation surrounding the Supreme Court’s decision on health care reform has kept HR executives in a frustrating state of suspended animation for much of the year.

So I figured that on the cusp of the high court’s ruling, health care reform would be the overwhelming topic of discussion once I was among the 12,000 or so attendees at the Society for Human Resource Management’s confab in late June.

But I didn’t think I’d be chatting about it before I hit the 64th annual soiree in Atlanta.

No sooner did I get on the plane in Chicago that I met an HR director from a 400-employee specialty hospital in Omaha, Nebraska, who also was headed to the conference. It took no time to realize our expectations paralleled each other’s: She wanted to learn about health care reform, and I wanted to cover the anticipation and detail the collective HR world’s reaction to the court’s ruling on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

As it turned out, we were not alone in the search for a guiding light to illuminate our path to health care reform enlightenment. At the baggage carousel I overheard two other people talking about the pending ruling. I guessed they were SHRM attendees. They concluded their discussion with one woman turning to the other, uttering an exasperated sigh, “I just wish they’d get it over with.”

Well, they were expected to—the day after the conference ended. Once it was apparent early into SHRM’s first full day on June 25 that a ruling wouldn’t be handed down until June 28, several sessions on health care reform—which not surprisingly were packed to the gills—buzzed with tweets and talk about the delay.

Those justices sure know how to build the suspense.

Call it what you want: impatient anticipation, anxious annoyance, eager hope for the future or outright dreaded fear of the unknown, but health care reform is the gift that indeed will keep on giving. To say health care reform is landmark, game-changing legislation that alters the way HR departments implement benefits is an understatement. Not only was the HR director I met seeking some measure of clarity on how she and her staff would implement it for hospital employees, but also she knew health care reform would alter her field in general.

In the six years I’ve been at Workforce Management, I cannot recall an issue that created the angst and heartburn that health care reform has stirred up for HR practitioners.

Still, there’s a familiar feel to the furor facing the profession. Shake-ups around people management aren’t new—something I’m especially aware of as Workforce Management celebrates its 90th year of publishing. Once again, we are writing about something that measurably reshapes the responsibilities of HR departments across the board.

As I spent two days late last year reading over the archives of Workforce Management and its predecessor, Personnel Journal, what struck me most was no matter how much it seems the role of HR leaders has changed throughout the years, the more it remains the same.

Whether it was 1946 or 1996, it seemed issues that are bandied about today were the same basic concerns of personnel managers and HR executives throughout the past 90 years.

Issues such as employee engagement, managing problem workers and coping with unions has been keeping HR managers reaching for the Bromo-Seltzer for decades.

Perhaps most important, HR people have tussled with legal compliance. The implications of 1938’s Fair Labor Standards Act and 1964’s Title VII continue to reverberate today.

Health care reform will likely be no different. Whatever the nuances of the Affordable Care Act ultimately may be, HR departments and benefits managers will be on the front lines of corporate compliance and implementation.

With benefits enrollment season approaching, HR directors like my new acquaintance from Omaha will be understandably busy. Our state of suspended animation around health care reform has now expired, and a new frustration around having to move fast is just beginning.

Rick Bell is Workforce Management’s managing editor. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management, July 2012, p. 58 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on February 11, 2012August 8, 2018

The Last Word: Backyard Retirement Plan

Since the financial meltdown hit and my retirement investments largely were blown to bits, I joke with my kids that they’d better buy a house on a big enough plot of land for me to comfortably locate my future digs. Nothing fancy, I tell them; enough room in the backyard for a refrigerator-size cardboard box works just fine.

The kids, God bless them, have grander visions for my golden years. “Dad, don’t be silly,” they tell me. “We’ll pitch a nice tent for you. It will be just like camping when we were little.”

Welcome to the new retirement reality, 2012.

Sure we joke about our days of gray, but unfortunately for a lot of boomers there’s more than a grain of truth to this modern-day gallows humor. According to a study last summer by Palo Alto, California-based investment advisers Financial Engines, nearly half of all boomers—those of us born between post-World War II and the early 1960s—fear that retirement will result in poverty.

Scarier still, an upcoming Aon Hewitt report reveals just 4 percent of employers feel “very confident” their workers will retire with enough money.

Many boomers who were laid off during the Great Recession still can’t find permanent work. Those of us lucky enough to hang onto our homes—we considered them our nest eggs, knowing a company-funded pension was not in our future—are largely under water, or if we’re lucky, barely have a chimney poking above.

Consider where we were just six years ago. As 2006 dawned, the sun was especially bright as our home values grew like kudzu. Investment portfolios—for many of us defined contribution plans like 401(k)s—happily followed suit. Birds chirped carefree tunes as the mailman delivered quarterly reports of double-digit returns. If a fund provided less than 10 percent, it was time to dump it and find another—heck, there were plenty that touted 20 percent returns.

Just a year later, however, gloom encompassed our bright little boomer future. The sky-high home values we used as ATMs to fund kitchen remodels and kids’ braces plummeted like rocks in a murky lake as the subprime mortgage crisis started sinking our retirement dream.

Later that year the Great Recession was officially under way and we boomers watched helplessly as the financial meltdown roared through the fall of 2008 like a Southern California wildfire. What remaining financial security offered by 401(k)s quickly went up in flames.

Within a year’s time, most every piece of financial advice imparted to us by our parents, financial counselors and anyone with an opinion was shredded. Owning a home—the American dream—was a financial mess. The values of save, save, save in a company-sponsored retirement plan might have been better served by burying cash in a coffee can in the backyard.

I recall a former colleague telling me he lost $50,000 in his retirement plans virtually overnight. On a journalist’s salary, that kind of loot takes a long time to accrue.

I would like to believe, three years past the depths of the worst economic time since the Great Depression, there are lessons learned.

Even though workers will still be tempted to do the coffee-can-in-the-backyard trick, there is wisdom in long-term stock investments. Employers must drive home that point.

The military has offered financial counseling for decades with great success. Service members also have benefited from financial incentives to advance their education.

I’m not sold on employees being automatically enrolled in employer-provided retirement programs. After all, I know my financial obligations better than my boss does. But it merits consideration, especially if the employer is matching an employee’s contribution.

Yes, the employee’s fruitful retirement is at stake, but so is the employer’s future. There is the so-called employee life cycle, and if the company expects to remain vibrant and relevant, the employer must maintain that circle of life. To pull a page from the Disney cartoon The Lion King, do you really want a befuddled, toothless, drooling Simba running your sales department?

And honestly, do I want to live in my kids’ backyard? Of course not.

But should that retirement money run out and I wind up scoping out a corner of the yard, I’m putting in for a five-man tent.

Rick Bell is Workforce Management’s managing editor. To comment email editors@workforce.com.

Workforce Management, February 2012, p. 34 — Subscribe Now!

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress