Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Sarah Fister Gale

Posted on October 8, 2013June 20, 2018

Onboarding: Tips and Best Practices for Bringing New Workers on Board

When Lois Miller, group head of human resources services and solutions at MasterCard Inc., took over the credit card company’s onboarding program in late 2011, it had a lot of problems. Stories about new hires not getting their badges and PCs, or not having access to the network for a week after they were hired was fairly common, she said. “It eventually got back to the CEO, and he decided it had to be fixed.”

Miller was brought in to revamp the program, focusing both on culture and technical needs of new hires, including making sure they have all the tools and technology they need to start working on day one.

“We wanted to get to a place where employees could be more productive fast, but also that they would look back and say it was a really good onboarding experience,” Miller said. To streamline the process and keep tabs on employees, Miller started using the company’s Workday human capital management system.

In the year since they’ve been using the onboarding system, new hires report better onboarding experiences, she said. “The key was enabling the onboarding workflows through Workday.”

Six Ways to Incorporate Technology Into Onboarding

Employees will never be more in love with your organization than the day they start work. And one of the primary goals of a good onboarding program is to maintain that enthusiasm.

Experts offer this advice on how technology can help engage employees as soon as they are hired, and streamline tasks so they are more productive from the start.

1.     Send welcome messages. Create videos of key executives welcoming new employees, and send those links to new hires as soon as they accept your offer, said Katherine Jones, a lead analyst at Bersin by Deloitte. It’s an efficient way to introduce employees to the leadership team and to get them excited about starting their new job.

2.     Build a new hire portal. Create a site on the network where employees can go to complete all of their administrative tasks, learn about the corporate culture, take new hire training, and find out anything else that will help them be more productive, said Kim Lamoureux, a lead analyst at Bersin by Deloitte. “It enables employees to take responsibility for onboarding tasks, rather than waiting for someone to tell them what to do.”

3.     Pre-board. Take advantage of electronic signature and verification tools to let employees finish administrative paperwork online before their first day. This keeps them excited about the job, and allows them to be more productive when they start, Jones said. “This can be especially good for college graduates who may have months between when they are hired and when they start work.”

4.     Build a new-hire social network: If you are hiring a large number of young employees, an online new-hire community can help them feel more at home. These corporate social networks can be used for work tasks — allowing employees to help each other learn the ropes; and for socialization so they can make friends and feel a greater sense of belonging.

5.     Track onboarding tasks. Use task management tools to track new-hire status and progress. Many of these tools also offer automated reminders when employees fail to stay on track.

6.     Engage new hires in the company’s social network. Don’t just give them a password, Jones said. Invite them to join online conversations, participate in surveys or ask questions of their colleagues. It’s a way to get them connected to other people in the company, even if they are all in different offices, she said.

—Sarah Fister Gale

Out of the Way

As soon as employees are hired — and before they even start — they are added to the Workday system, which triggers access to a number of onboarding tools. They receive an email welcoming them aboard with links to videos from the CEO, along with access to the cloud application where they can update their employment information, upload a photo for their badge, read about learning opportunities and complete paperwork for benefits enrollment, taxes and direct deposit. “All of the tasks you normally do on the first day are now done in advance,” Miller said.

At the same time, the manager of the new hire goes online to select the tools and office space they will need, and those requests are sent to the information technology and facilities department, so they are ready for the employee on their first day.

You May Already Have the Tools

Many companies have existing workplace technology that can be used to support the onboarding process, though they may not be using it effectively, said Kim Lamoureux, a lead analyst at Bersin by Deloitte. “If you have a task management system, or employee tracking tools, you can make sure new hires don’t fall through the cracks,” she said. “It makes the process much more manageable.”

She encourages HR executives to review their applicant tracking and HR management system to find the tools or modules that can specifically support onboarding. Most HR systems, including Silkroad, Successfactors, Taleo and Workday offer tools to build new hire portals, implement electronic signatures for online documents, create task lists and talent profiles as well as dashboards and reports to track new hires.

“These tools simplify the process and give HR visibility into how new hires are progressing,” says Leighanne Levensaler, vice president of product management at Workday.  

Internal social media tools, including Chatter, IBM Connect, Jive and Yammer can also be implemented in the onboarding, said Mike Grafham, head of Yammer customer success in the United Kingdom. “Organizations can build networks for preboarding new hires, send them welcome messages, and give them an environment where they can ask questions and engage with other employees,” he said.

It can also help new employees learn the business more organically by allowing them to search for answers to specific questions or read message boards to understand unique workflows. “Instead of taking a training course on a topic, a new hire can join a group and read backward through the posts to see how work is done,” Grafham said. “That helps them become immediately more productive.”

While onboarding isn’t all about technology, taking advantage of these tools can streamline the process and make it consistent across the organization, said Katherine Jones, a lead analyst at Bersin By Deloitte. “Technology can mitigate bottlenecks in the onboarding process, and engage before they even come through the door.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on May 30, 2013August 3, 2018

Some Companies Replace Cubicles With Flex Spaces

When Yahoo Inc. CEO Marissa Mayer decreed that all telecommuting employees must immediately return to the office or risk termination, her argument was that people need to be together for innovation to happen. But it takes more than warm bodies in the same building to generate interactivity. You can make employees work in the office, but when you park them in isolated cubicles, days can go by before they engage with anyone beyond their adjoining cube mate.

If companies really want their people to be innovative, they have to create flexible workspaces that foster collaboration and give employees the technology—and permission—to work wherever in the space they will be most productive.

“Instead of forcing people to come to the office, you want to make them want to be there,” says Beth Moore, director of workplace strategy for CBRE, a global commercial real estate services firm based in Los Angeles.

In many companies that begins by replacing cramped cubicles with shared workstations, open collaboration spaces and lounges located to generate casual interactions. Such redesigns create a more productive work environment while simultaneously lowering real estate costs, says Diane Stegmeier, president of Stegmeier Consulting Group, a workplace change management consultancy in Cleveland. “A flexible work environment, in conjunction with flexible work policies, can accomplish both financial and performance benefits for the enterprise,” she says.

This trend toward creating a more mobile and flexible workplace is expected to grow in the coming years. A 2012 survey from Citrix suggests that, by 2020, the average workplace will provide just seven desks for every 10 office workers, and each person can access the corporate information technology network from an average of six different computing devices. The figure is expected to be as low as six desks for every 10 workers in the United States, Singapore, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.

“Organizations are investing in the space they have to create enticing workplaces that foster collaboration, innovation and creativity,” said Mick Hollison, vice president, integrated marketing and strategy, at Citrix in a news release about the survey. “The result is a stronger organization with high-caliber people performing at their best.”

Global consulting firm Accenture has seen dramatic financial and productivity gains since adopting a flex-space environment. Twelve years ago the company replaced dedicated offices with shared work spaces, and implemented a telecommuting policy that encouraged employees to work wherever they were most productive.

Since then, the company has reduced its real estate portfolio by 50 percent while increasing head count and revenue. And workplace surveys show employees are more engaged and satisfied than ever before, says Dan Johnson, Accenture’s global director of workplace innovation. “Our flex-work arrangement is one of the reasons people stay at Accenture,” he says. “It’s a very valuable benefit.”

CBRE is seeing similar results as it rolls out flex-space redesigns in offices around the world, including its Los Angeles headquarters, which will open this summer. The new space will reduce the company’s real estate footprint by a third without cutting the number of employees, Moore says. It plans to use the savings to upgrade IT infrastructure, collaboration software and support services for employees, Moore says. “Giving people the right tools and easy connectivity will make them more effective,” she says.

However, the transformation to a flex-space environment isn’t always easy. Even if you offer employees comfy couches, coffee bars and wireless connectivity, they may not willingly give up their dedicated office space; and managers can struggle to figure out how to oversee a team that is suddenly scattered throughout the building.

“A big challenge is when the company embraces the idea of flexible-work environment, yet are unwilling to reduce the size of individual spaces or have people give up their dedicated private offices or cubicles altogether,” Stegmeier says. “The end result is often a requirement for more space, rather than less, which of course is less efficient and more costly.”

To avoid the drama that can come from such a dramatic culture change, facilities and HR teams should work together on a communication plan that sets expectations ahead of time about where employees will work in the new space, how the spaces will be used and why the redesign will enhance their work flow, she says. “A commitment between the facilities departments and human resources to work together is paramount to the success of flexible-work initiatives.”

Global office furniture company Steelcase Inc.’s corporate hub offers gourmet food, a range of seating options, and a state-of-the-art display wall where employees can catch up on the latest company news.

A few years ago, the cafeteria at Steelcase headquarters in Grand Rapids Michigan, looked like a typical corporate café. It was a vast, brightly lit room with a scattering of mostly empty tables and few other amenities to draw people in. When employees did go down there, they usually bought their lunch and returned to their office to eat it, says Sara Armbruster, Steelcase’s vice president of workspace futures and strategies.

Today, it’s the social hub of the corporate campus.

A major remodel in 2011 transformed the space into what is now known as the Steelcase Work Café, a collaborative space outfitted with the company’s state-of-the-art furnishings, a gourmet menu and a variety of seating areas to accommodate quiet work, casual networking, boisterous teams and formal meetings. Every seating area features outlets and IT connections for video and audio conferencing, and food service is available from early morning through late evening for employees doing international conference calls.

“It’s a phenomenal space,” says Steve Waugh, Steelcase’s director of global credit. In the past, he never spent more than a few minutes in the cafeteria, now he goes there all the time. “It’s a place I can hang out and run into people I need to connect with,” he says. “That connectivity makes it totally worth the investment.”

The naturally lit space is anchored by a giant media wall that sits beside the espresso bar, running a stream of Steelcase videos, news and project updates to keep local employees apprised of global corporate events. “Even though the café is in Grand Rapids, we want to create a sense of connection to the rest of the company,” Armbruster says.

And it is just one aspect of the company’s three-year campus reinvention project launched in 2010 to give its workforce a more collaborative office environment.

“Our old space was a Dilbert cube farm,” says Waugh, who was among the first employees to have their office redesigned. Now his team works in a ‘free-address’ space, where they can choose from shared workbenches, semi-enclosed spaces or a variety of conference rooms. They also share a café area with the procurement team, which was intentionally done to create opportunities for the two groups to come together throughout the day.

Waugh likes the new office, though he admits it was challenging for some of his team members to give up their dedicated spaces—and all the stuff they stored there. “It takes time to get used to having less material, and to choosing where to work every day,” he says. But eventually they adapted, and now most of them carry their office in their backpacks. “It’s important for employees to be open-minded, and to recognize that this is about giving them ‘best places’ to work.”

No one at Accenture has a dedicated office space—not even the company’s top executives. Instead, employees reserve space to suit their needs wherever they happen to be. That may be a shared workbench in a corporate office, a hotel conference room or their own kitchen table.

“We are a mobile workforce, and mobility and traditional offices don’t go together,” says Johnson, the global director of workplace innovation.

Accenture offices include a combination of shared bench tables and collaborative spaces. There are no desks and no cubicles. The proliferation of shared space is intentional. “We see the office is a place to be with people and to become part of the culture, so we prioritize collaboration over individual workspaces,” he says. Employees can reserve space for quiet tasks, but most people opt to do their “head-down work” at home or on the road.

Accenture embraced flex space more than a decade ago. It was a natural fit for the company’s road-warrior culture, Johnson says. It gave employees a better work-life balance, and enabled Accenture to cut its real estate footprint in half and achieve 85 percent usage of office space on any given day. That’s compared with the 50 percent average seen in most companies.

The company reinvests much of those real estate savings into leading-edge IT infrastructure and software. “Our overriding objective has been to minimize the cost of real estate and shift that investment to services and technology to support our people,” Johnson says.

All of the office workspaces feature shared monitors and wireless technology. Corporate phone lines are integrated into employees’ laptops so they ring wherever in the world that employee is working. Employees also have access to the latest collaborative software tools for chatting, video conferencing and desktop sharing from remote locations, so that teams can connect and collaborate virtually.

These collaboration tools are key to the success of Accenture’s distributed workplace culture, Johnson says. “Whether someone is in Chicago, Paris or another floor of the office, you can connect with them instantly.”

When Hurricane Sandy hit New Jersey last year, CBRE had to close its Long Island office for weeks.

“If we had had a mobile workspace, continuity of the business would have been consistent,” says CBRE’s Moore. But all of the employees in that office had dedicated workspaces with desktop computers, so they were unable to operate until the office reopened.

It was bad timing for the company, which is currently in the process of redesigning all of its global offices to offer employees a more flexible, mobile, collaborative workplace environment.

The redesign began in 2011, after a workplace study showed that office space was often vacant or underutilized, and the siloed design of cubicles was preventing teams from working together.

“Instead of building out more space that wouldn’t get regularly used, we decided to break down the silos and create something that was more collaborative,” Moore says.

To be sure the new design met employees’ needs, Moore and her team launched a 360-degree assessment. They interviewed company leaders, conducted employee surveys, and did focus-group studies to see how employees used their space and what they thought was missing.

“The results helped us paint a picture,” she says. Using that data, they are slowly rolling out redesign projects around the world to coincide with their current lease arrangements.

One of the first transformations occurred in the Amsterdam office, where CBRE replaced individual cubicles with assigned “neighborhoods” where teams co-locate at comfortable activity-based work areas flanked by open collaboration rooms. Each neighborhood is strategically located so that teams who often work together have adjoining spaces to foster more interdisciplinary work.

“Having assigned neighborhoods gives people the comfort of home so it doesn’t feel like a free-for-all,” she says. It also enabled her to reduce the number of seats from 240 to 198, which cut real estate costs without cramping employee space.

“We’ve never reached peak capacity,” she says.

The company is now redesigning offices across the U.S., where 40 percent of its leases are up in the next 36 months. The downtown Los Angeles office, which is set to open this summer, will also feature the activity-based neighborhoods, lots of open collaboration spaces, and state-of-the-art wireless technology and collaboration software.

The new office is 30 percent smaller than the old space, enabling Moore to double her IT spending without going over budget. She was also able to add a dedicated concierge to the office to book meeting rooms, help solve technical issues, and make sure all catering and event planning needs are addressed. “It’s our way of making sure clients and employees have the best customer service possible,” she says.

And while CBRE employees are also free to telecommute, Moore hopes the new office design will make them want to come to the office. “We give them great technology, and make it easy to connect and communicate with team members, so they can have a more meaningful experience at work.”

When Microsoft opened its corporate campus in Redmond, Washington, in the late ’80s, employees believed that software projects were better done behind doors, and the office design reflected that, says Martha Clarkson, global workplace strategist at Microsoft. “There were a lot of doors and hallways with a lot of medium gray walls and teal and purple carpet.”

But Microsoft is a very different company today. “We used to be a software company; now we are a products and services company,” she says. In the past several years, the company has acquired or launched a diverse range of products and businesses, including Bing, Hotmail, MSN and Xbox. The projects and teams that support these diverse product lines have changed, she says, and so, too, has the way people work.

Clarkson has spent the past 10 years redesigning the spaces in which Microsoft employees do their jobs, which is no small task. The Redmond campus alone has 100 buildings, all of which were originally designed for a less mobile, office-centric work environment.

Many of those buildings have been torn down, while others are in the process of being remodeled with shared workspaces, dedicated collaboration spaces and lounges on every floor. The standard-issue desks and chairs have been replaced with modern colorful furniture framed by giant display screens and interactive white boards that curve to the angle of the space. Shared spaces also feature the occasional climbing wall, game table or grown-up slide to get creative juices flowing.

Each remodeled office follows a few basic tenets: People need space to collaborate, access to technology and opportunities to showcase Microsoft products. But employees require different kinds of space for different types of activities, says Harald Becker, the company’s senior product planner. Game developers may want a single shared space, for example, while Windows programmers may need more private space. “Variety is important and you have to involve the employees in decisions about their space,” he says.

Becker’s office was redesigned 18 months ago, and now features lots of small collaboration spaces and shared offices with movable tables and dual-user monitors. It is adjacent to the design team’s space, which features larger collaboration spaces because they tend to work in bigger groups.

He likes the option to choose between quiet and collaboration spaces, and the open flow between office areas that lets him bump into people he’d otherwise have to actively seek out. “I have a lot more visibility with a broader spectrum of people,” he says. “That makes it much easier to get a sense of what’s going on with other teams.”

To ensure teams are comfortable in the new offices, Clarkson crafts a communication strategy to both educate them about the intent of the space and to offer tips on appropriate behavior when working in a shared environment. “You have to let people know why you are making that change,” she says. “Because otherwise they can forget.”

Clarkson worked with HR to craft a series of funny protocol videos that show employees eating stinky lunches, taking over collaboration spaces as their personal office and talking loudly on their cellphone in public workspaces. She emails the video ‘episodes’ periodically to employees as they become accustomed to their new office environment. “People need reminding, not instructing,” she says of the video series. “When you show them what not to do, they are more likely to remember.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on May 16, 2013August 6, 2018

Corporate Foreign Language Training on the Rise

Foreign language ability may be the final barrier to global corporate expansion. Whether companies partner with international firms, open offices abroad or simply strive to meet the needs of a diverse customer base, their ability to communicate in multiple languages is becoming a strategic business imperative.

And some companies are willing to spend serious money to make sure it happens.

When the Japanese firm SoftBank Mobile Corp. purchased a 70 percent share in the U.S.-based firm Sprint Nextel Corp. earlier this year, the company’s executives offered employees 1 million yen, about $9,800, if they could score 900 points or better on the international Test of English for International Communication, or TOEIC, Any score over 800 is considered “advanced proficiency.”

While offering such lucrative incentives is uncommon, many global companies are embracing language training as a key talent management initiative as they attempt to expand their international reach.

“Growth in corporate language training is the biggest trend we’ve seen in the last three years,” says Chuck Frydenborg, senior director of corporate sales in North America for Rosetta Stone, a global language learning software company. In 2009, Rosetta Stone’s corporate clients were limited to a small percentage of Fortune 1000 companies, but today it’s one of the company’s fastest growing segments. “Any company doing more than $1 billion in revenue is starting to see language learning as a serious business value.”

Nissan Motor Co. has been offering language training to its employees for years because the company recognizes the value of cross-cultural training and skill sets, says David Oberstaedt, senior manager in talent management for Nissan North America Inc.

“The automotive industry continues to evolve globally, and we need to be able to move the internal expertise we have to the areas of the world where it is needed,” he says. “When we make strategic hires, we are always thinking about whether that person can take on global assignments. Foreign language ability is a part of that.”

The global automotive firm is headquartered in Kanagawa, Japan, but has U.S. headquarters in Franklin, Tennessee, and has deemed English as its official corporate language. As a result, English language training is especially vital for Japanese managers who want to move up in the company. “A certain level of English language proficiency is required for any management promotion,” says Chika Tsuda, manager in the training department at Nissan in Yokohama, Japan. “And if they want to be considered for a position in the U.S., they must achieve at least a 500 on the TOEIC,” which is an intermediate rating.

But English isn’t the only language being offered. The company provides a variety of optional online language training programs to all of its global employees and their families, including Livemocha, an online language-learning site. Nissan also provides one-on-one training to any employee preparing to take an assignment in another country with follow-up courses and tutoring once they arrive on-site.

“Even though we always do business in English, we encourage our people to be conversational in the language of that country, so they can communicate with their staff,” Tsuda says.

Nissan also tracks self-reported language proficiency in employee profiles as part of its SuccessFactors Inc. performance management software program to identify potential candidates for overseas assignments.

Investing in language training benefits employees as they transition into expat assignments and helps to create a more global corporate culture, which is key for multinational organizations looking to gain an edge in new markets.

Yet many companies fail to take a proactive approach to language training as part of their global strategies, and that can make expansion efforts much more challenging, says Julia Bonnheim, director of marketing for Livemocha. “We have a lot of companies that come to us after the fact,” she says. These businesses set up global partnerships and build factories or offices in other countries only to realize later that their leaders can’t communicate with the new teams.

For example, a client recently reached out to Rosetta Stone only after completing a huge expansion in Brazil. “They were so focused on translating corporate material to Portuguese; they never stopped to think about how the management of this office would work,” she says. “they never dealt with the language training side of the project.”

Such oversight reduces the productivity of employees, creates on the job confusion, and shows a level of disrespect for employees in the new workplace.

“It’s a common disconnect,” says Duane March, a language trainer for Mindstorm Group, a training company in Mannheim, Germany. “Companies always talk about how important communication is, but they don’t treat it that way.”

If a company wants an employee to achieve a level of language proficiency, it needs to give them the time and tools to hone that craft before moving them to that new work environment. They also need to recognize that, for a while, that employee will be less productive as they learn their new language, March says. “It’s not a matter of whether they will be less productive, it’s a matter of scheduling it,” he says. “It can either happen before they move into their new role or after they arrive.”

Training managers should also consider offering courses that are relevant to their industry, and setting expectations for progress to speed the language learning process. It’s not enough to give employees access to a self-paced program and assume they will learn on their own, March says. Companies need to track employees’ progress and provide ongoing engagement or the learning won’t stick.

“If you don’t have an opportunity to use a new language, the value disappears within weeks,” he says. “So if you are going to spend the money to train employees, make sure they are able to use it on the job.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on May 6, 2013August 3, 2018

Companies That Don’t Embrace Social Media Might Be Treading Water, Experts Say

A couple of years ago, General Electric Co. wasn’t satisfied with how it was bringing good ideas to life internally.

Like most global organizations, GE struggled to create connections and share corporate information among its 300,000 employees.

So, in January 2012, the company launched GE Collab, a custom social media platform that is fundamentally changing the way GE employees communicate and collaborate. The platform features centralized dashboards and calendar-sharing tools to foster easy collaboration, and innovative user environments, called Streams and Canvas, that mimic the way consumers interact on popular social networking sites. The tools allow employees to follow each other, add hashtags to comments for easy searchability and link discussions to documents so the context of the conversation remains with the file.

“For years, we dabbled in virtual collaboration tools, but this pulls it all together,” says Ron Utterbeck, GE’s corporate CIO. “It’s solving the basic problem of how to find the right expert in a large organization.”

GE is among the many companies tapping trends in social networking to alter the way work is done and people are managed. And while few companies have the resources to build custom internal platforms, business leaders around the globe have begun to integrate social media tools into their business processes to improve collaboration, engage potential recruits and promote the corporate brand via employees’ own social networks. From posting company updates on LinkedIn and Twitter to collaborating with far-flung employees via SharePoint or Yammer, these technologies have infiltrated and improved the way employees do their jobs.

Despite success stories like GE Collab, many HR managers remain skeptical of the benefits social media brings to the workplace. According to a new report by the Center for Professional Excellence at York College of Pennsylvania, a majority of HR professionals complain that young employees abuse social media in the workplace, citing text messaging, inappropriate use of the Internet and excessive use of Twitter and Facebook as the most common violations. Some companies go so far as to ban all social media use in the workplace and block access to them via the corporate network in an effort to stop employees from wasting time online. But the data suggests that trying to deny today’s social media reality means missing out on better business results. Consulting firm Towers Watson & Co. has found that among employees who use internal social media tools for work-related purposes, 41 percent report improved productivity.

What’s ultimately needed is a new approach to management, experts suggest. Employers can reap the rewards, such as greater engagement and productivity, and avoid pitfalls if they embrace the new “social” paradigm, says Kathryn Yates, a global practice leader for communication and change management at Towers Watson. “Managers have to stop being afraid of these tools,” she says. “The key is to train managers and employees about how to use social media in a productive way.”

In just the past decade, social media has surged from a college student pastime to a full-fledged corporate phenomenon. Facebook was founded in 2004, but by December 2012, it had an average of 618 million daily active users. Similarly, LinkedIn and Twitter also have experienced skyrocketing growth.

To be sure, the explosion of social media activity carries risks for organizations. They range from tricky questions about whether companies or employees own social media content and contacts to the possibility that employees will embarrass the brand with ill-advised tweets to concerns about complying with National Labor Relations Board guidelines on protected employee speech. In addition, young employees in particular are defiant about their social media activities. In a recent survey, nearly 3 out of 4 millennial workers said they don’t obey corporate information technology policies, and 66 percent said IT departments have no right to monitor their online behavior, even if that behavior is conducted using company-issued devices on corporate networks.

And as the York College of Pennsylvania survey shows, there are legitimate fears that social networking equates to “social not working.”

“It is often a concern we hear that employees will spend their time playing on social networks rather than working,” says Adam Wootton, director of social media and games at Towers Watson.

But to ban all social media use in the workplace and block access to social media sites is not the best approach, Wootton says. “A blanket ban on social media or draconian rules is more likely to lead to employees just using their smartphones or other channels to use their preferred social networks.”

On the other hand, companies should not adopt a complete hands-off approach, experts say. Improved productivity will only come when employees understand the right and wrong way to use social media on the job, and managers provide guidance on what’s expected, Yates says. “Most people will respond appropriately if you communicate that social media at work is OK as long as it’s used to get your job done and doesn’t compromise your performance or that of others,” she says.

Companies increasingly are getting that message. They are welcoming social media and weaving into the way they do work.

Consider network communications technology company Cisco Systems Inc. As part of its new-hire training, every employee at Cisco is educated about the appropriate way to use social media, and unless they are blogging as a spokesperson for the company, they are instructed to note that their comments do not necessarily reflect those of the brand.

But after that management trusts them to do the right thing, says Brett Belding, Cisco’s senior manager of IT mobility solutions. “It’s not our responsibility to police how people work. It’s about whether they get their jobs done.”

This willingness to trust employees is part of the broader corporate culture at Cisco, which acknowledges that employees’ work and personal lives bleed together, he says. “We don’t care if someone checks Facebook at work, because we know eventually they are going to work a 10-hour day or take a 9 p.m. call.”

Cisco also recognizes that when employees post to social media, it can benefit the brand. As Belding points out, he is just as likely to tweet about his next speaking engagement as he is to post pictures of his kids—and both types of posts bring value. “It humanizes the company,” Belding says. “It shows the world that we are not just a logo. We are people.”

Cisco’s employees are also experiencing greater productivity through the use of the company’s internal WebEx Social platform. The tool makes it easier for dispersed teams to collaborate virtually, which cuts downtime, reduces travel and face-to-face meetings, and enables them to get feedback from a broader circle of Cisco experts in less time.

“I can post a configuration on the network, and five minutes later an engineer will tell me why they wouldn’t do it that way or what I should do to improve it,” Belding says. “It’s a lot more efficient than emailing documents back and forth.”

Cisco’s internal social network also provides Belding with a customizable dashboard that lets him see his newsfeed, check meetings, review work streams and approve purchase orders or vacation requests in a few clicks. “It takes a lot of friction out of the process when you put all of that information into a single view.”

At GE, Utterbeck started building the custom collaboration tool in 2011 in an effort to improve teamwork and make it easier to access corporate knowledge. GE Collab is helping to make those searches easier, and to bring the GE community closer together. “It’s like crowdsourcing information,” he says. “I can ask a question, and within one minute, five different people in the company will tell me what I need to know.”

And it’s only just the beginning; Utterbeck’s team continues to roll out new features and is working on advanced search tool that make it easier to identify expertise in the employee population by looking at what people write, the groups they participate in and their past work experience.

Cisco and GE may be leading the trend to embrace social media for workplace management, but many organizations are just beginning to figure out how these tools can support their broader strategic business goals.

In most companies, social media as a corporate tool begins with recruiting. Talent managers use Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube to educate potential recruits about the company, promote the corporate culture and mine potential candidate pools.

“It’s a great way to put your message out there,” says Corey Munoz, the Arlington, Virginia-based director of talent management for BAE Systems, a global defense and aerospace company with 100,000 employees worldwide. Just two years ago BAE blocked the use of Facebook, YouTube and other social media platforms on the company’s network. Now, however, it supports employees’ use of social media, and takes advantage of popular sites to woo new recruits. “Because we are a U.K. company, we are less visible in the U.S., so we use social media sites to engage potential recruits and to communicate with them about our company.”

His team posts videos on YouTube featuring employees talking about their roles on cutting-edge projects. They also have corporate profiles on Facebook, Flicker, Twitter and LinkedIn, and host a LinkedIn group for high-performing BAE alumni. The LinkedIn group serves two roles, Munoz says. It helps BAE’s best employees stay connected, and at the same time it demonstrates that the company values and supports its top talent. “It sends a signal to potential employees that we have a robust high-potentials program,” he says.

Putting a strong corporate message out via social media is vital for attracting top talent in today’s workplace. Forty-seven percent of employees say a company’s online reputation matters as much as the job offer, according to a recent survey from staffing services firm Spherion Staffing.

Employees are looking for a clear corporate mission that is reinforced by a company’s social media profile and practices, says Sandy Mazur, a division president at Spherion. “Both of which have significant implications for how well businesses attract and engage their workforce.”

Munoz credits BAE’s change in attitude about social media to the leadership of Linda Parker Hudson, the company’s president and CEO who came onboard in 2009. “She is driven by technology, and has set the tone” for social media use around that, he says. She also blogs regularly, and encourages employees to post comments and repost company updates to their own social networks, and to use tools like Yammer and SharePoint to build communities of practice and network with each other. “It energizes employees and makes them feel connected,” he says. “It’s not like the old email discussions threads that no one ever read. These tools generate discussions.”

Being able to connect with peers is a vital piece of the corporate social media value proposition, says Hope Koch, a Baylor University associate professor of information systems. And those connections don’t all have to be directly related to a specific project or business outcome. Social media tools can also serve to build a stronger corporate culture by fostering more personal connections, she says.

Koch studied the use of social media at a large financial firm where new recruits built a homegrown network to connect and collaborate. The employees, who had been recruited from college campuses all over the country, used the site to share information about apartments and restaurants, help each other get acclimated to the company, and build new friendships in an unfamiliar environment. “It humanized the workplace,” she says.

These softer connections benefited both the employees and the business, because it led to a greater sense of organizational commitment and better employee engagement. “For millennials, mixing their work life and their social life via online social networking created positive emotions for the employees who use the system,” Koch says. “These emotions led to more social networking and ultimately helped the employees build personal resources like social capital and organizational learning.”

This type of personal engagement drives direct business value, Yates says. Research from Towers Watson shows that highly engaged employees generally produce better business outcomes than their less-engaged co-workers. The research also shows that organizations with high levels of sustainable engagement—which describes the intensity of employees’ connection to their organization—enjoyed an average one-year operating margin close to three times higher than that of organizations with low levels of engagement.

GE is already seeing such benefits because of Collab. The platform has more than 200,000 active users, and the response has been overwhelmingly positive. “We solve problems faster, and we have more confidence in the business choices we make,” Utterbeck says.

GE’s leadership is equally impressed, giving Utterbeck full support for the project. “They want people from all levels of the organization to be able to collaborate and communicate just as if we were a small company,” he says. By harnessing the power of social media, he’s enabling just that.

Sarah Fister Gale is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on April 2, 2013August 3, 2018

Creating a Secure ‘Sandbox’ on Employee Devices

Just two years ago, containerization was in its infancy, Suby says. But today, 20 percent of companies use some form of containerization on their mobile devices, according to a 2012 survey conducted by Frost and the International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium, a professional group. And that number of organizations tapping container technology is expected to rise as more companies adopt BYOD policies.

“Companies needed to find a way to exert control over their data,” Suby says. “Creating pockets of control on end-user devices is one way to achieve that.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a freelance writer based in the Chicago area. To comment, email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Instead of banning risky apps, many companies create password-encrypted environments on users’ mobile devices. These isolated virtual workspaces, sometimes called “containers” or “sandboxes,” allow users to manage corporate data and run business apps including their corporate email and meeting software, without having them intermingle with personal data.

The technique lets users have dual personas on their devices, explains Michael Suby, vice president of research for Stratecast, a division of consulting firm Frost & Sullivan.

The business apps in the container can communicate with each other, but cannot exchange data with external apps. The information technology team is also able to monitor and control all the data that goes in and out of the container, and can remote-wipe that section of the device, while leaving the rest of it intact.

“It’s an evolution in mobile device management,” Suby says. And adoption of so-called “containerization” is on the rise.

Posted on March 19, 2013August 6, 2018

Companies Turning to Tools to Manage Contingent Labor

In 2012, more than 1 in 4 employees were contingent labor, according to the Aberdeen Group in Boston. And that number is likely to jump to 30 percent in 2013.

As those dramatic statistics suggest, contingent workers such as staffing agency temps and independent contractors have become a large and permanent part of the workforce. As a result, companies need to think carefully about the tools they use to manage these workers so they can maximize productivity while minimizing compliance issues.

“It’s risky to treat contract workers like full-time employees,” says Bryan Pena, vice president of contingent workforce strategies at Staffing Industry Analysts, a research firm in Mountain View, California.

Because contingent workers are paid differently, receive different benefits and operate under different employment rules, they need to be tracked using different talent management tools, he says. Otherwise, employers can open themselves up to litigation over access to health care and other benefits if job descriptions or employment language overlap.

While many human resources software providers offer basic tools to track their contingent workforce population, to meet payment and hourly compliance requirements, when companies want more detailed management options they turn to vendor management systems. A VMS is an automated software system to track suppliers, temps and contract labor. Most are cloud-based and offer tools to track time and deliverables, as well as analytics and forecasting features so companies can manage contingent labor costs and better align workers with projects.

In the past, these tools focused largely on compliance concerns and reducing cost by allowing employers to match work needs with the lowest-priced staffing vendor. More recently, VMS products have added capabilities to measure the performance of contingents.

“VMS solutions have evolved in the past decade to become a vital solution in the contingent workforce space,” Dwyer says. They “help best-in-class organizations drive visibility into all facets of contingent workforce management, enhance analytics and reporting, and provide an automated portal for managing day-to-day operations.”

The VMS market is fairly mature, with companies such as Fieldglass Inc., IQNavigator, Provade and Peoplefluent dominating the market.

However, many companies still take a piecemeal approach to managing contingent labor. GeoDigital International Inc., a mapping and visual infrared inspection company in Hamilton, Ontario, uses five different tools to track and manage its 320 employees, which includes roughly 50 contingent workers.

“We use ADP and Paychecks for payroll, Replicon to track contractors’ time and attendance, Halogen for training, and a new SilkRoad HR system for talent management and other HR processes,” explains Liza Scurr, GeoDigital’s vice president of human resources. “And they all need to tie together.”

Every other week, contingent workers input their hours to the cloud-based Replicon system, which automatically forwards the information to their manager for approval, and then sends it to payroll. The entire process is automated and takes no more than two days to complete, she says. All of the workers, including contingents, participate in employee surveys and online training courses using a program from Halogen Software Inc.

The challenge is integrating all of these systems so that workforce data can be easily shared and incorporated into all of the HR management functions.

Integrating data management systems is key to managing contingent workers, whether you are using a VMS, an HR system or multiple stand-alone programs, says Ray Wang, principal analyst and CEO at Constellation Research,. Along with making sure contractors are paid promptly, integrated data systems protect employers from inadvertent compliance violations, and enable them to track performance and cost metrics so they can identify high performers, negotiate better rates and define delivery criteria.

At GeoDigital, the HR team is using data from Replicon to establish performance metrics for contractors, such as the number of pages of data they should produce in an eight-hour day.

“We already know the number of people it takes to deliver specific activities, but we couldn’t see the average daily output,” Scurr says. “Through daily tracking we are starting to see patterns, and we can create benchmarks against our best people.”

This is one of the many ways contingent labor data can help companies improve efficiencies, Dwyer says. “The intelligence gleaned from these systems can help executives plan, budget and forecast for the future.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a writer in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.

Posted on March 5, 2013September 1, 2023

Employers Turn to Biometric Technology to Track Attendance

When hourly employees arrive at Greathouse Screen Printing in San Diego, instead of punching a time clock they smile into a biometric facial recognition device that sits on a counter at the front of the shop. In a matter of seconds, the device identifies them, automatically punches them in, and sends the data to a cloud-based time-and-attendance software program.

The company’s owner, Shawn Greathouse, implemented the biometric clock from Processing Point Inc. a year ago to streamline his time-management process and to ensure that he was only paying employees for the hours they worked.

“Buddy punching was definitely part of the decision,” Greathouse says. “It was never an out-of-hand problem, but it did happen.”

Buddy punching—the practice of punching another employee in or out when they aren’t there—is one of many forms of time theft.

A 2009 study conducted by Harris Interactive Inc. showed that 21 percent of hourly employees admit to stealing company time. While only 5 percent participated in buddy punching, 69 percent said they punch in and out earlier or later than scheduled, 22 percent put additional time on their time sheet, and 14 percent didn’t punch out for unpaid lunches or breaks.

“It’s all a form of fraud,” says Lisa Disselkamp, director at Deloitte Consulting and co-founder of the Workforce Educational Organization, a nonprofit time and labor management research firm in Richmond, Virginia. “When employees inflate their time, it directly impacts the bottom line.”

Many employers are implementing biometric time clocks to make it harder for hourly workers to steal company time. Whether the device uses facial recognition, fingerprint tracking or vein-pattern scanning, these clocks can eliminate time theft by verifying the identity of those clocking in, and creating a digital audit trail so time sheets can’t be altered.

“Biometric technology won’t tell you if someone punched in then ran back to their car,” Disselkamp says. “But it will validate that employees are on the premises when they say they are.”

They also make time and attendance data—and payment history—much more defensible. Digital time tracking means employers can prove that they paid employees for the hours they worked and demonstrate to safety auditors that they had the right number and combination of employees on-site at any given time.

Such validation has become increasingly important in recent years as lawsuits involving fair-wage practices have picked up. More than 7,000 wage-and-hour lawsuits were filed in federal court in 2011—up 32 percent from 2008, according to published reports. The primary complaint in these lawsuits was that workers were being forced to put in more than 40 hours a week without overtime pay.

The U.S. Labor Department recovered $225 million in back wages for employees during fiscal 2011. And that number is likely to increase, as the Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division continues to add new investigators to pursue violation complaints.

The best way for employers to fight these lawsuits—assuming they are unfounded—is with data, says Andrew Newby, chief operating officer of ProcessingPoint Inc., a business service provider that offers a line of biometric time clocks. “Many courts side with employees in claims that they were underpaid or not given fair overtime,” he says. “But if the employer has records that shows employees were paid for the hours they worked, the case goes from a ‘he said, she said’ to one based on facts.”

Along with tracking all original punches, most biometric software programs will indicate if a punch has been changed along with the original punch time, and may require a manager’s note explaining why the change was made, which prevents tampering.

“It’s important to have these tracking features for the audit trail,” Newby says.

All of these biometric fraud controls were appealing to the leadership team at Yarco Co., a real estate management firm based in Kansas City, Missouri. Yarco has 400 employees managing 100 properties in 10 states, and 375 of them are remote hourly workers.

However, the number of external workers wasn’t the only impetus for making the switch to a biometric time management system, says Grant Kaufman, Yarco’s director of operations. His team was looking for efficiency.

“We did an HRIS conversion to Ceridian in 2007, and once that was done, we realized we had to get rid of our clunky, old time-and-attendance system,” Kaufman says, referring to a human resources information system.

Before the conversion, Yarco relied on hand-written time cards that employees filled out once every two weeks and faxed to their manager. Once approved, the company’s two payroll staffmembers would spend the entire weekend deciphering the handwritten faxes and manually entering the time data into the Ceridian system so employees could be paid on time.

“It was brutal,” Kaufman says. The faxes were difficult to read, and even when they were legible, they were trusting employees to be completely honest about their hours.

When Kaufman began exploring alternative systems, the Ceridian sales rep connected him with M2Sys Accelerated Biometrics, a technology company in Atlanta. A few months later the company rolled out an M2Sys finger-vein-reader clock at all 100 property sites.

The tool was easy to use. Employees create a template by doing three scans of their finger so the system can record their vein pattern. After that, employees just slide their finger into the reader, and it records the punch in less than 30 seconds.

Despite this ease of use, Kaufman’s team went to all 100 sites to conduct training and to talk to employees about what biometric technology is, how it works and how the data would be used.

“We handled it all with kid gloves because we knew some people would be touchy about Big Brother issues,” he says.

This is a common concern among employees who fear their data is going to be used against them, says Michael Trader, president of M2Sys. “Invasion of privacy is the biggest obstacle employers face,” he says. “But it’s important to note that no image is ever stored.”

The vein reader—and all biometric time clocks—don’t take actual pictures or fingerprints of employees. They scan the identified features and translate them into a numbered code that corresponds with a specific employee ID. Without an associated picture, the scans can’t be used to track an individual or steal that person’s identity. “It’s just an encrypted binary data stream,” Trader says.

Kaufman’s team also explained the benefits of the clock to the employees—they could be paid sooner, it would eliminate handwriting confusion and data-entry errors, and it meant they no longer had to remember their hours for the biweekly time sheets.

“Once they realized how easy it was to use, we didn’t get as much flak as we thought,” he says.

And while he’s certain the company has reduced the incidence of time theft, the real benefit came from the efficiencies of the new system. Thanks to the automated system, they cut the time it takes to process payroll by 90 percent and were able to cut one full-time payroll staffer. “The savings were unreal.”

Educating employees about how biometrics work can go a long way toward easing their fears and getting buy-in for the technology, Greathouse says. “They are going to punch in one way or another,” he says. “If you address their concerns about the technology upfront, it won’t become a problem.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on March 4, 2013August 6, 2018

Companies Struggle to Recruit Internationally

Last year, CH2M Hill, the Englewood, Colorado-based global engineering firm, hired 400 people in the Middle East alone.

The company has been steadily expanding its reach worldwide, and much of its growth is coming from emerging markets. The $6.4 billion global engineering company has more than 30,000 employees and has managed projects in 149 countries.

To meet growth goals, the talent management team has to be able to quickly source foreign employees. But it’s not easy, says Nicole Guiet, the company’s talent acquisition director.

Guiet oversees talent management efforts from Alaska to Argentina, and has found that each part of the world has its own recruiting culture. “There are labor shortages everywhere,” she says. “And the recruiting techniques that work in the U.S. don’t necessarily work around the globe.”

The disconnect between local and international recruiting techniques is making it difficult for many HR executives to keep up with their companies’ pressing need for global talent acquisition. And executives are getting frustrated.

According to a recent study by the Economist Intelligence Unit on behalf of KPMG titled Rethinking Human Resources in a Changing World, 3 out of 4 executives say their workforce is becoming increasingly global, but just 1 in 4 believe their HR teams excel at sourcing and retaining international talent.

And while more than 80 percent of executives say that putting in place an effective talent management strategy is key to their success, just 24 percent believe their HR team is able to support their globalization strategy.

“Executives are beginning to realize that the only thing that can’t be cloned by the competition is a deep talent bench,” says Tim Payne, partner and European HR director for KPMG in London.

HR professionals have an important role to play in global talent acquisition, but they have to look beyond their tried-and-true local recruiting strategies to meet executive expectations. That means figuring out how to deal with the inconsistent education systems in many countries, along with limited talent pools, and fierce competition from global and local businesses for the best people.

And they need to recognize that they don’t understand everything about how the local hiring culture functions, Payne says. “One of the reasons why it is so difficult for HR to support global business units is that simple global policies don’t work.”

KPMG experienced this problem when it launched a KPMG center in India where there is a constant battle for the best talent. Relying on its London recruiting strategy, KPMG set up a two-day assessment center in Delhi, but applicants wouldn’t stick around.

“The process was too slow, and we lost good candidates to competitors,” Payne says. “When we started listening to local experts, we changed our process to be in line with local norms, and it instantly became more effective.”

Local experts are the best tool in this fight to improve global talent-acquisition strategies, Guiet adds.

At CH2M Hill, her team creates strategy reports for each country or region that define demographic information, including local hiring challenges, talent-pool availability, local and international competitors, common drivers to attract talent, and salary expectations.

Then they work with local recruiters to build a media plan that takes advantage of the best local recruiting strategies. “The key is admitting you don’t have all the answers and being willing to listen to those who do,” she says. “It’s about going slow now so you can go fast later.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on December 14, 2012August 3, 2018

SAP Spreads the Word through Employee Brand Ambassadors

This year, SAP launched the Social Sabbatical program, a corporate social responsibility effort through which high-potential employees spend three weeks embedded with entrepreneurial companies in Brazil, India and South Africa helping them solve business challenges.

The program was created to give employees leadership opportunities while making a tangible social impact, says Brittany Lothe, SAP’s head of corporate social responsibility. But it also created a unique group of public ambassadors for the SAP brand.

“There is no better story teller than someone who is living and breathing a new experience,” she says.

To make the most of this opportunity to spread the word about SAP’s corporate social responsibility efforts, the 30 participants completed four weeks of preparation leading up to the projects, which included training on how to use social media tools to talk about their experiences.

Along with teaching them how to use social media tools to tell their stories, SAP had communication team members available in each country to answer questions and bounce ideas around. “The training let them know they were not going it alone,” Lothe says.

Once embedded, all of the participants tweeted photos and updates, and several of them wrote longer posts and blogs from the field after they returned.

“There was so much to communicate,” says Evan Welsh an SAP employee who worked with ASMARE, an association of Brazilian catadores—garbage collectors who gather trash at night and then separate out reusable recyclable materials. Welsh’s team helped the group create marketing materials including a newsletter, communication plan and templates for promotional efforts to raise awareness about the work ASMARE and the catadores do.

Many of the catadores were formerly homeless or in jail before they began to work with ASMARE, which also operates a restaurant and gallery to display art that the catadores make from the recycled materials. Working with the catadores had a profound impact on Welsh and his colleagues, and within days of arriving, they started posting stories, pictures and video interviews on Facebook, Twitter and SAP’s Community Network. The teams in India and South Africa shared similar stories.

“These are by far the highest read posts we’ve ever had on our community network or our Facebook page,” Lothe says, noting that thousands of readers have clicked through since the program launched. Lothe reposted many of the blogs and photos across SAP’s internal network, and encouraged employees to share the stories on their own social networks.

“Empowerment was such an important part of this process,” she says, noting that employees were not required to post about their experiences, but it was encouraged. “It was an opportunity for them to share their stories, and we were able to leverage their experience and enthusiasm to extend the brand.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a freelance writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on December 10, 2012August 3, 2018

Diversity Training Must Include White Perspective, Experts Say

A few years ago, Lee Tschanz, vice president of North America sales for Rockwell Automation Inc., scheduled a meeting with one of his managers to help him improve “managing up.”

Tschanz, a middle-aged white man, was going to offer the manager, a 50-year-old black man, examples from his own career on how to be more authoritative with employees who are senior to him in the firm. But instead, he admitted to the man that he had no idea what it is like to be a black manager at Rockwell Automation. Then he asked the manager if he should be coaching him differently.

“His response was, ‘Wow. I’m so glad you said that,” Tschanz says.

The manager went on to explain that he grew up in the South where any challenge to white male authority by a black man was risky, and that he’d been taught his whole life to avoid such confrontations. They ended up having a long conversation about the issue, and Tschanz agreed that even though he wasn’t sure what the best solution was, he promised to have that manager’s back whenever he pushed himself to manage outside his comfort zone.

“After that, he got better at managing up,” Tschanz says. “And more importantly, my willingness to have those conversations increased.”

Such stories are common at Rockwell Automation thanks to the company’s nontraditional approach to diversity and leadership training. In partnership with the training company, White Men as Full Diversity Partners, Rockwell has put more than 450 of its leaders through a three-day, off-site, experiential training lab where they are forced to examine their own assumptions about white male privilege, explore other people’s experiences, and define the role they can play in building a culture of inclusiveness in the company.

That’s the real business benefit of a strong diversity program, says Jeanine Prime, vice president of research for Catalyst, a not-for-profit research firm focused on women in business. “When leaders see inclusiveness as a critical part of the role, they are able to get the best out of all their people,” she says. “It leads to lower turnover and better outcomes for talent development.”

It also helps Rockwell differentiate itself in recruiting, particularly among hard-to-find female engineers, says Joan Buccigrossi, Rockwell’s director of inclusion and engagement. “There are not a lot of women engineers, and everyone wants them.”

Tschanz was one of the first participants in the Rockwell program, and he admits that at first he was skeptical. He began the course thinking he treated everyone equally, but by the second day he realized he had no idea what it was like to be a woman or a person of color in the predominantly white Rockwell environment. “I discovered that it’s about more than how you treat people,” he says. “It is about understanding that differences exist in culture and they make you more prone to act a certain way.”

So inspired, Tschanz put his entire staff through the course, and created an inclusion change team to address diversity issues in his group. That team went on to create the company’s annual “Get Connected” event where women from across the company get together to network, hear speakers and participate in workshops.

Tschanz’s team also made smaller adjustments, such as expanding social events beyond golf and cocktails, and making people aware of subtly negative behavior, such as asking why a female colleague is upset if she complains in a meeting. “You would never ask that about a man,” he notes.

Once leaders became aware of what they were doing, the culture at Rockwell began to change—and not just in the sales department, Prime says . Catalyst did an in-depth study of the Rockwell program and found measurable changes in behavior among white male leaders across the company.

These included a 39 percent reduction in gossip, a 17 percent increase in how much managers agreed that white men have greater advantages than women and racial/ethnic minorities, and a 40 percent increase in thinking critically about different social groups among managers who do not have many cross-racial friendships.

The change was most pronounced among managers who were the least concerned about appearing prejudiced, Prime says. “After the labs, those managers registered the most significant change in taking personal responsibility for being inclusive.”

Rockwell’s success with this course underscores why it is so important to involve white men in the culture-change process. “White men are a powerful stakeholder group, and they need to get the message that they are responsible for being a part of the solution,” Prime says.

That awareness is critical, Tschanz adds. “You can’t get on the path to inclusion until you are able to look at your culture through a different set of eyes.”

Sarah Fister Gale is a freelance writer based in the Chicago area. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 … Page 9 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress