Louis Green, CEO of the Detroit-based Michigan Minority Business Development Council, seeks to improve business opportunities for the1,311 minority-owned businesses and 450 corporations headquartered in Michigan that conduct $15.5 billion worth of business in America. |
Gail Sparks Pitts |
Monica Emerson |
Lawrence Almeda |
Lisa Ip |
Angerine Jacqueline Gant |
Richard Schott II Detroit |
Eric Cedo Good mentoring has helped boost Cedo, 33, up the networking ladderwith his company, Brain Gain Marketing. The company conducts social media and Web-related business for Campbell-Ewald, the state of Michigan, ArtServe Michigan and other creative clients. |
Linda Forte |
Frank Jonna |
Molly Padovini |
Detroit Diversity Survey
According to the 2006 Diversity Survey by the American Society of Employers, 22 percent of the 113 Detroit area companies that were surveyed report having a formal diversity policy in place. Of this 22 percent:
- 81 percent have diversity recruitment.
- 73 percent have diversity training for managers.
- 62 percent engage in outreach with local diversity organizations.
- 58 percent have diversity training for their employees.
Evidence-Based Health Care Payment Test Sites Chosen
Two cities have been selected as test sites for a health care payment model based entirely on evidence-based medical guidelines.
Prometheus Payment Inc. has selected Rockford, Illinois, and Minneapolis as the initial pilot test sites. It will work with local health care coalitions and existing health plan payment systems. Two other locations will be announced soon and the experimental payment system will be implemented in all four locations by January 2009.
The payment model, which was developed by a group of experts in health care economics, law, policy, health plan operations and performance measurement, has also received a $6.4 million grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which will help fund the pilot program.
Washington-based Prometheus Payment will pay providers based on what it costs to deliver only the care that it says science has proved to be appropriate for specified conditions. This differs from traditional fee-for-service, which critics say encourages high volumes of service, and capitation, which can induce health care insurance providers to limit access to care.
For more information, visit www.prometheuspayment.org.
Filed by Joanne Wojcik of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
OSHA Fines United Airlines for Numerous Workplace Safety Violations
The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited United Airlines for multiple “serious, willful and repeat violations” of federal workplace safety laws, proposing fines totaling $192,500.
The 44 violations announced Tuesday, May 20, were discovered during a November inspection of the Chicago-based carrier’s operations at O’Hare International Airport. Violations included a failure to conduct an asbestos survey, improper design of flammable liquid storage cabinets and rooms and inappropriately labeled containers of hazardous chemicals.
“These violations should not exist at any work site,” Diane Turek, director of OSHA’S Chicago office, said in a statement. “They are problems that can be avoided if an employer is dedicated to protecting employees. Employers must remain dedicated to keeping the workplace safe and healthful or face close scrutiny by this agency.”
“There is nothing more important than the safety of employees and customers, and United considers this assessment an opportunity to focus on strengthening key areas of workplace safety,” a spokeswoman said in a statement.
This is the second time this month that United has run afoul of OSHA regulations. The Chicago-based carrier was cited on May 2 for 44 violations that carried proposed fines totaling $215,000.
Filed by Lorene Yue of Crain’s Chicago Business, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
Bush Signs Bill Barring Genetic Discrimination
President Bush signed the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act into law Wednesday, May 21.
The new law prohibits employers from firing, refusing to hire or otherwise discriminating against workers on the basis of genetic information. It also bans health insurers or group health plans from basing eligibility determinations or adjusting premiums or contributions on the basis of genetic information, and it forbids the disclosure of genetic information.
The new law “protects our citizens from having genetic information misused, and this bill does so without undermining the basic premise of the insurance industry,” President Bush said in a statement released by the White House shortly after he signed the bill.
The president of America’s Health Insurance Plans issued a statement praising the action.
“With this landmark bipartisan legislation, Congress and the president have taken strong action to prohibit discrimination based on a person’s genetic makeup and to protect patients’ privacy as they pursue genetic evaluations,” said AHIP president Karen Ignagni. “This legislation also ensures that patients can continue to benefit from health plans’ innovative early detection and care coordination programs that improve the safety and quality of care.”
A longtime proponent of the law said its enactment would promote better disease management.
“Individuals no longer have to worry about being discriminated against on the basis of their genetic information, and with this assurance, the promise of genetic testing and disease management and prevention can be realized more fully,” Sharon Terry, president of the Coalition for Genetic Fairness, said in a statement.
The legislation prohibiting genetic discrimination has been in the works for nearly a decade.
Filed by Mark A. Hofmann of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
American Airlines Slashes Capacity, Thousands of Jobs
American Airlines announced Wednesday, May 21, that it is cutting domestic capacity by up to 12 percent and will lay off thousands by the fourth quarter.
American Airlines executives say it’s too soon to tell how many employees will be laid off and where, and declined to reveal where flight capacity would be cut the most, saying only that unprofitable routes will be the first to go.
The sputtering U.S. economy and surging oil prices suggest the industry is once again headed for a rough ride, after enjoying the two best years of the decade in 2006 and 2007.
The capacity cuts did not surprise airline analysts.
“The industry has been chipping away at its schedule,” said Joe Schweiterman, a transportation expert and professor at DePaul University in Chicago. “There’s been a massive downward shift in supply. The airlines’ business model of operating a massive hub-and-spoke system is threatened by these kinds of spectacular oil prices.”
Oil prices topped $130 a barrel for the first time Wednesday and kept heading upward.
In a sign that nickel-and-diming in the industry just went from bad to worse, the carrier also announced a $15 charge for the first checked bag, starting with flights purchased June 15. It’s the first airline to charge such a fee—so far, most have been levying fees only on the second bag and beyond.
During the past two years, most U.S. airlines have cut capacity on less profitable domestic routes while introducing charges for checking bags to try to offset rising fuel costs and deal with intense competition.
In April, Delta Air Lines, the No. 3 U.S. carrier, and Northwest, the fifth largest, finally hammered out a merger agreement last week that would create the world’s largest airline. The other major airlines—American, United, Continental and USAir—are also likely looking for merger partners.
Delta Air Lines said in March that it will eliminate 2,000 jobs while reducing domestic capacity by 5 percent, in addition to a 5 percent cut that was already planned.
Filed by Hilary Potewitz of Crain’s New York Business, Lorene Yue of Crain’s Chicago Business and Andrew Osterland of Financial Week, sister publications of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
House Approves FSA Funds for Reservists Called to Duty
Legislation approved Tuesday, May 20, by the House of Representatives would allow individuals called up from the reserves for active military service for at least six months to take unused balances in their health care flexible spending accounts as a taxable distribution.
The legislation, H.R. 6081, which was approved on a 403-0 vote, deals with the forfeiture of unused balances in FSAs when employees are called up for military service.
That can happen because the individuals and their families typically give up their employer coverage—including their FSA—and enroll in TriCare, a Department of Defense health care program that has very low cost-sharing requirements. Under the legislation, employees could receive a taxable distribution of their account balance.
“For those called to duty late in the year and who have not incurred many claims up until that point, this could be very beneficial to them since they would otherwise have to forfeit the funds,” said Scott Sims, a legal consultant in the Falls Church, Virginia, office of Hewitt Associates.
The Senate could take up the legislation, which includes other tax breaks for military personnel, later this week.
If passed, the FSA provision would apply to distributions taken after enactment.
Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
Massachusetts Refines Health Care Coverage Rules
Massachusetts regulators plan to clarify final rules soon on the design requirements of health plans state residents must be enrolled in to avoid financial penalties.
On January 1, 2009, under the state’s landmark health care reform law, most state residents will have to be covered in plans that meet minimum “creditable coverage criteria.”
Under rules finalized last June by the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority—the state agency in charge in implementing key portions of the 2006 reform law—plans considered offering minimum coverage can’t, among other things, have annual deductibles greater than $2,000 for individual coverage or $4,000 for family coverage.
Additionally, in order for the enrollees to have creditable coverage, a plan cannot impose an overall annual benefit limit or a per illness annual maximum benefit for covered core services. The bulletin will provide more clarification of what are considered covered core services, a spokesman for the Connector Authority said.
The bulletin itself will be issued in about a week, said Jon Kingsdale, executive director of the Connector Authority, who spoke Monday at a briefing in Washington sponsored by the Alliance for Health Reform and the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Since enactment of the Massachusetts law, about 340,000 previously uninsured state residents have obtained coverage, with the largest number of the newly insured enrolled in a program whose premiums are heavily subsidized by the state.
Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
S&P 500 Firms Push Funding of Defined-Benefit Pension Plans
The defined-benefit pension plans of S&P 500 companies returned to overfunded status in 2007, according to Standard & Poor’s.
According to a new study, as a group, the defined-benefit plans of the companies in the index were overfunded by $63.4 billion for 2007, compared with an underfunded status of more than $40 billion in 2006. Funding improved to 104.4 percent in 2007, from 97.3 percent in 2006, but remained well below the 128.2 percent peak in 1999, at the end of the bull market.
The number of companies in the index that had fully funded pension plans rose to 127 in 2007, up significantly from 85 in 2006 and 47 in 2005. Last year was the first time since 2001 that the S&P 500 DB plans were overfunded as a group.
Good news, but other post-employment benefits, or OPEBs—primarily medical and drug plans—remain severely underfunded.
Within the S&P 500, the aggregate OPEB underfunding declined from $293.7 billion in 2006 to $269.1 billion in 2007. While the 26.2 percent funding level last year was an improvement, it pales in comparison to the 104.4 percent funding for pensions.
More worrisome, of the 310 companies in the S&P 500 that offer other post-employment benefits, only six have overfunded OPEB plans.
“The situation for OPEBs continues to be bleak as global pressures are forcing U.S. companies to scale back benefits to remain competitive in markets where many of their peers do not have these expenses,” explained Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at Standard & Poor’s and author of the report.
Standard & Poor’s expects the pullback in benefits to continue as companies increase co-payments and premiums, cover fewer employees and shift a greater portion of the expense to workers and retirees.
As for DB plans, several elements contributed to the overfunded pension position of the S&P 500 companies in 2007. Silverblatt pointed out that plan sponsors invested heavily in international markets, especially emerging markets, last year. Gains abroad helped offset a subpar year in the U.S. markets.
Liabilities also were kept in check because of higher discount rates, fewer covered employees and fewer payments to those who were covered.
Accounting rules played a role too, now that companies must show pension funding on their balance sheets. “Combining all of this with the desire of companies to add contributions to show improved numbers, you have an overfunded pension situation,” Silverblatt wrote.
For this year, Silverblatt indicated that pension funds are running more than $100 billion short of the 8 percent return they had projected for 2008. Cautious optimism has returned, however.
“Based on our projections, Standard & Poor’s expects to see 2008 pensions remaining fully funded on an aggregate level, with companies contributing a bit more than they are currently expecting to,” he said.
Filed by John Goff of Financial Week, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
Terms of California’s Proposed Wellness Program Mandate
California’s A.B. 2360 would require that employers bidding on state contracts provide their employers with one or more wellness or fitness benefits, including, but not limited to, the following:
● A facility used exclusively for the purpose of promoting physical fitness of employees, including a gymnasium, weight training room, aerobics workout space, swimming pool, running track or any indoor or outdoor court, field or other site used for competitive sports events or games.
● Financial support to an amateur athletic team that is under the sponsorship of the prospective bidder, if the team consists entirely of its employees.
● Subsidies of employees’ membership in a health studio or health club.
● Classes or presentations on the employer’s premises by a qualified person or organization providing information and guidance on subjects relating to personal and family health and fitness.
Return to the main article
Filed by Joanne Wojcik of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.