Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Site Staff

Posted on April 15, 2004July 10, 2018

There’s an Iron Curtain Between Human Resources and Marketing

There has been talk before about whether some workforce management functions should work more closely with marketing departments–or even merge. Now, Northwestern University’s Forum for People Performance Management and Measurement says there’s an “an alarming gap in communication” between marketing and human resources that could have a negative impact on organizational performance.


Frontline employees “may not communicate, or even know, key messages developed by marketing executives and communicated externally via advertising, public relations and direct marketing.” Sixty-five percent of the marketing and human resources professionals surveyed disagree or strongly disagree that “marketing and human resources personnel spend time discussing customer needs and share information with each other.”

Posted on April 14, 2004July 10, 2018

Open Jobs May Be Taking the Fizz Out of Coke

If spending time finding replacements for departing employees can be distracting, Coca-Cola must be awfully distracted these days.


Coke’s general counsel, Deval Patrick, is the latest to resign. Notably, Patrick is an African-American and was hired after the company agreed to settle a race-discrimination suit. The company is trying to improve the diversity of its workforce.


The head of Coke’s North American unit left recently, as did the chief workforce management professional. The CEO is leaving–and there are others.


There have also been several allegations of ethics violations at Coke, including an allegedly fraudulent marketing test.

Posted on April 12, 2004July 10, 2018

More Women Are Earning Big Money

The proportion of women earning more than $100,000 tripled between 1991 and 2001, according to a new report from the Employment Policy Foundation, a pro-business think tank based in Washington, D.C.


In 1991, about one of every 143 full-time female employees earned more than $100,000. By 2001, one out of every 48 did. The number of men earning high salaries also went up, though not nearly as much.


According to the foundation, the proportion of women earning under $20,000 per year fell significantly–by over one-fifth–during the same time.

Posted on April 9, 2004July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Do We Develop A Succession Plan To Create Two Levels Of Leaders

Dear Nurturing:

In a fast-changing world, it is wise to plan ahead both for growth opportunities and for the possibility your company could shrink. For an organization growing at the rate you describe, you may want to look beyond succession planning toworkforce planning. As you may know, workforce planning is the process of proactively planning to avoid talent surpluses or shortages. It’s based on the premise that by forecasting and planning ahead, a company can avoid the need for layoffs or “panic” hiring. Workforce planning might be more accurately called “talent planning,” because it integrates the elements of each of the workforce-management functions that relate to talent.

Start simple
When you select a workforce-planning model, your first inclination might be to implement the most sophisticated planning model you can envision. Instead, start with a model that is the easiest to understand and implement.

Forecasting
The foundation of workforce planning is a workforce forecast. It’s a month-by-month view of the following:

  • Existing staff
  • Predicted turnover (voluntary and involuntary)
  • Retirements and extended absences
  • Promotions or transfers in/out
  • New hires
  • Total need
  • Estimated gap

The output of this forecast, or estimated gap, can be used to coordinate the supply of talent to meet the demand.

Retention
There’s nothing more frustrating than hiring and training a group of managers, only to have them leave just when you need them the most. In a small firm, the retention of key managers is even more crucial because the firm’s small size means there are likely to be few “surplus” managers available should someone leave.

Increased retention generally comes from more communication with your “potential managers.” Start with periodic meetings where you ask them to share what motivates and frustrates them. Increased retention also means providing them with sufficient learning and job challenges, so that they’re continually excited about their current job while they’re moving toward their dream job.

Developing future leaders
Select employees you feel are potential leaders. The secret to leadership development in a small firm is to give these individuals numerous small projects–or parts of bigger projects–where they can act as leaders for a short period of time. You can also use short-term job rotations to give them broader experience. By offering rewards and incentives to managers for developing others, you can speed up the learning process while simultaneously ensuring that your managers don’t get jealous or become concerned about their own job security.

Recruiting
Even if your retention and leadership development programs work well, it’s still a good idea to have a strong recruiting component in your workforce plan. Start by recruiting people that have the skill not just to do their current job, but also the potential to do the job at least one level above them. Also consider developing a pool of contractors, consultants, and retirees that could fill in quickly, if necessary, should your retention or leadership development efforts fail. Build relationships with them over time so that when you do have an immediate need, the finding and assessment parts of your plan are already complete.

SOURCE:John Sullivan, head and professor of the Human Resource Management College of Business at San Francisco State University April 21, 2003.

LEARN MORE:Measure Supervisors’ Competencies.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on April 9, 2004July 10, 2018

Pay in the U.S. Military

The two tables below reflect first the number of officers and enlisted personnel in the U.S. military in 2002 and 2004, followed by someinformation on pay grades.



    The number of medical and dental staff, intelligence gathering and supply and procurement employees went up, while the number of administrative staff, equipment repair and communications personnel fell.


    Pay increased up to16 per cent for entry-level enlisted personnel and 10 per cent for high-ranking officers with 10 to 26 years of service.

Number of Active Duty Personnel 2002 2004
Officer    
Aviation 44,500 34,900
Medical/Dental 33,000 36,500
Intelligence 11,000 12,000
Engineering/Maintenance 49,000 33,300
Operations Specialties 50,000 49,400
General/Executive Officers 5,700 2,000
Administration 31,600 15,600
Scientists/Professionals 16,000 12,100
Supply/Procurement 15,500 20,000
Enlisted    
Medical/Dental 77,000 81,500
Technical 51,000 35,800
Administration 249,000 192,800
Electronic Equipment Repairs 151,500 109,100
Communications/Intelligence 160,000 110,500
Aircraft Repair/Maintenance 137,500 113,200
Service Specialties 152,000 108,800
Crafts 66,000 48,100
Vehicle Repairs 55,000 41,800
Armament/Munitions Maintenance 39,000 35,300
Infantry, Gun Crews, Seamen 220,000 204,800
Shipboard Propulsion 65,500 25,200
Mechanical Repairs 22,500 14,000
Total 1,702,300 1,336,700


Enlisted Grades Years of Service Pay Range per Month
(2002)
Pay Range per Month
(2004)
E-1 up to 2 $1,022-1,106 $1,193
E-2 2-3 $1,239 $1,338
E-3 2-3 $1,304-1,469 $1,407-1,585
E-4 2-6 $1,444-$1,752 $1,558-1,891
E-5 2-12 $1,562-$2,193 $1,700-2,368
E-6 2-24 $1,701-2,603 $1,856-2,810
E-7 2-26 $1,987-3,527 $2,145-3,855
E-8 8-26 $2,858-3,938 $3,085-4,314
E-9 10-26 $3,424-4,467 $3,769-5,054

Source: Department of Defense Personnel Data Center


Posted on April 8, 2004July 10, 2018

Claims of Harassment Against Afghanis Cost $550,000

“What I remember is, I remember hatred.”


That’s what one Afghani employee said of her employment at an auto dealership in northern California, a problem that’s going to cost her former employer more than half a million dollars.


The U.S. EEOC announced a $550,000 settlement April 6 with Barber Dodge and Fairfield Toyota, part of the Barber Dealer Group, a network of auto dealerships in Solano County, California. This resolves a federal lawsuit that alleged harassment of seven Afghani employees, with name-calling such as “terrorists” and “thieves.” The incidents were not a result of the terrorist attacks in the United States; they occurred in 2000.
 
Barber Dodge and Fairfield Toyota deny all charges but have agreed to resolve the lawsuit. The dealerships will pay the seven former employees $550,000, and will conduct training to prevent future discrimination, revise anti-discrimination policies and implement an effective complaint procedure.


The EEOC says it’s particularly concerned with discrimination against Middle Eastern, Muslim and South Asian communities. EEOC District Director H. Joan Ehrlich says the agency “will not hesitate to sue employers who have allowed such behavior to infect their workforce.”

Posted on April 5, 2004July 10, 2018

With Strikes Over, Employment in Food Stores on the Rise

Employment in food stores increased by 13,000 in March, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. This reflects the impact of employees returning from strikes.


Overall in March, the retail trade sector, of which food stores are a subset, added 47,000 jobs in March. The sector has added 132,000 jobs since December 2003.


Another hot industry is construction, where employment increased by 71,000 in March. Construction has added more than 200,000 jobs to the U.S. economy over the past year. Most of the March employment gain occurred among specialty trade contractors, according to the BLS.


Information on employment trends of the future is available online.

Posted on April 5, 2004July 10, 2018

Stock Options Makes Strange Bedfellows

The old cliché about politics making strange bedfellows is alive and well when it comes to the issue of option expensing.

Among those opposing the new government proposal to expense options: liberal Sen. Barbara Boxer from California and conservative Sen. George Allen from Virginia. Boxer and Allen support a bill that would mandate the expensing of stock options for the top five company executives, but not for the rest of a company’s workforce. Start-ups would also be exempt under their bill.

“Requiring the expensing of all stock options won’t prevent high-profile corporate scandals,” Boxer says. “All it will do is result in workers losing their stake in the company they work for and prevent companies from sharing the wealth they create with their workers.”

FASB has issued a proposal that would require companies to expense options on their income statements. Interested parties can discuss the proposal in the Benefits Forum.

Posted on April 3, 2004July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Do I Tell Employees About Upcoming Layoffs

Dear Retailing:



Appropriately communicating a corporate downsizing requires preparation, planning, and persistence. Organizations need to approach the situation with dignity and compassion while clearly articulating the business decisions surrounding the downsizing to their workforce.

Some best practices to keep in mind while planning the communications with your employees:

Make sure that senior management is visible and accessible throughout the process. Employees most likely will have questions and concerns. They need to feel comfortable that the organization will provide an “open door” policy during a layoff situation.

Make sure your outplacement provider that shares your values. Your provider should understand your business and concerns so it can tailor a plan that specifically fits your needs and tailor outplacement programs for each employee.

Provide managers with separation-notification training. The separation process is difficult for the notified employees, but the managers communicating the layoff news also could feel extremely uncomfortable in this situation. Training managers in what to say and what not to say can help structure the situation ahead of time.

Communicate often and well with your employees. Open communication and tailored discussion around the business objectives surrounding a layoff situation throughout a downsizing can minimize the uncertainty, skepticism, and distrust within the retained workforce. Some companies find electronic newsletters, internal briefing sessions, and open discussion forums can lessen the angst and anger within a workforce.

Make sure your separated employees are quickly engaged in the transition process. Some companies find that providing transition counselors on site can ease the emotional strain that these employees may be feeling at that moment. These counselors (either on site or otherwise) also can provide your separated employees with quick access to the tools they need to immediately get their job searches off the ground.

Share transition success stories with all separated employees. Some organizations find that posting photos of employees who had landed positions can keep the workforce informed and even raise the morale of the entire group.

The key to successful communication throughout the entire downsizing or restructuring process is to stay focused on the people in your organization. Regular and consistent communication with your workforce will help both the separated and retained employees better cope and understand the business decision and the organization’s concern regarding a layoff.

SOURCE: Ken Kneisel, Senior Vice President, DBM, Atlanta, Georgia, March 27, 2003.

LEARN MORE: ReadCalculate the Cost and Benefit of a Layoff.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on April 3, 2004July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Can Psych Tests Help In Assessment

Dear Cognitive:



More and more companies are realizing the value of using psychological tests as part of their employee selection process. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, the most common pre-employment tests used by U.S. companies measured candidates’ cognitive abilities. The general consensus at that time was “smart people are more successful.” We now know there is more to work success than being bright. Implementing good ideas requires influencing people around us. Seeing projects to completion demands persistence and self-confidence. Today, managers are looking closer at job applicants’ personality characteristics and how they fit with the job and company. Professionally developed psychological tests can provide your company with objective and reliable measures of these personality traits.

When considering a pre-employment test, don’t assume one size fits all. Some test marketers would like you to think certain psychological tests can be used for all positions. It’s good to have healthy skepticism in this case. For a testing program to be effective, companies first must identify the specific personality attributes associated with success in the position being filled. Only then can the right test be chosen and integrated into your selection process.

When filling a sales position, for example, assessing sociability, persistence, and energy level may be more important than looking at analytical skills or conformity. Similarly, one may ask what kind of communication skills are needed for successful job performance. A publications editor may need strong writing and editing abilities as well as close attention to detail, whereas a customer service representative may need to think clearly under pressure and be able to articulate with clarity and respect the company’s policies and procedures.

In any employment situation, it’s important that assessment programs be designed and supervised by a professional with expertise in the construction and interpretation of psychological tests. When administered in the United States, these instruments should be used in compliance with federal and state employment laws as well as ethical guidelines established by such professional organizations as the American Psychological Association. You should also be aware of employment regulations and codes of professional conduct (such as those established by the International Test Commission) in other countries where you plan to use psychological tests. Test results should be considered in conjunction with multiple sources of information about an applicant. When combined with information obtained from work history, structured interviews, reference checks, and skill-specific evaluations, psychological tests can be a very valuable tool.

SOURCE: Linda B. Greensfelder, Ph.D., consultant and David E. Smith, Ph.D., president,EASI Consult LLC, St. Louis, Missouri, April 13, 2003.

LEARN MORE: SeePutting Job Candidates to the Test.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 … Page 416 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress