Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Site Staff

Posted on May 28, 2010August 9, 2018

Tribune Co. Proposes Another Round of Executive Bonus Payouts

Tribune Co. has proposed paying managers and top executives as much as $42.9 million in additional bonuses, on top of $16.2 million in such payments it requested earlier this week.


Tribune on Wednesday, May 26, asked U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Carey in Wilmington, Delaware, to approve the additional bonuses for 640 managers at the company’s newspapers, including the Chicago Tribune, and broadcast outlets, Bloomberg News reported.


The company earlier this week asked for $16.2 million in incentive payments for 2009 performance under two compensation plans as part of a revised bankruptcy reorganization plan filed with the court.


Some of Tribune’s executives, including CEO Randy Michaels, are eligible for payments under all three of the compensation programs, Bloomberg reported, citing the filings.

Tribune didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.


The Chicago-based company expects to begin confirmation hearings on the bankruptcy reorganization plan in mid-August and emerge from Chapter 11 later this year. The plan is still subject to a creditor vote and court approval.


The requests follow a payout of $42 million in February to top managers under bonus programs for work performed last year.


Filed by Lynne Marek of Crain’s Chicago Business, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.


 

Posted on May 28, 2010August 9, 2018

Dear Workforce Why Won’t My Team Members Help With Training?

Dear Enabler:

I suspect that your staff members have become disengaged and that you have allowed this uncooperative culture to develop over some considerable time. Take a big-picture view and ask yourself what it is you do on a daily/weekly basis to engage your employees—how you cultivate a team-based approach to work. For example:

• Do you set challenging department goals that are mutually agreed upon with your staff?

• Do you devise goals that require collaboration for success, or only individual goals?

• Do you track and report progress on your department’s/team’s goals?

• Do you meet weekly in a team meeting with all of your staff to share ideas and update progress?

• Do you meet with each of your staff members weekly for a one-on-one “What Is Going On” meeting to discuss individual concerns and progress?

• Do you show a personal interest in each and every staff member? Do you practice “management by walking around”?

• Do you provide both positive and negative feedback on a regular basis?

• Do you reward positive behavior and team achievements?

• Do you confront poor behavior in a non-emotive and direct way? (Or do you blow up?)

• Are you open to criticism without becoming defensive? Do you actively seek feedback from others?

• Do you compliment existing employees by asking them to buddy with or mentor new recruits?

Apply these ideas to improve your situation
Start by clearly articulating the benefits derived in training other employees. Benefits to your department may include shorter lag time to productive output for new recruits. Benefits to team members may be increased respect from peers and new recruits. Once you have articulated the benefits, call a special meeting to discuss your new direction. You now have a base from which to work.

Second, find out why staff members do not want to train others. Find the real reasons, not just the presenting reasons. You can do that at your regular weekly one-on-one meetings with each of your direct reports. Find out the roadblocks and remove them. It may be that they are under-resourced or feel unappreciated. Whatever the reasons, fix them.

Third, reward those who act on their responsibilities and discipline those who do not. Their behaviors will not change if there are no or inconsequential outcomes. Perhaps set up a “trainer of the month” award or give the best trainers some time off. The rewards do not need to be financial to be effective. For those who continue to refuse even after the roadblocks have been removed, start them on your company’s disciplinary process. Ignoring obstructers will only serve to demoralize those who are putting in the effort.

I have touched on some of the questions raised in the above list. Now go through the remainder and fill out further how you can more actively engage your staff in carrying out their responsibilities.

SOURCE: Leslie Allan, managing director, Business Performance Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia, April 30, 2010

LEARN MORE: Wanting managers to mentor isn’t enough. They must have a desire to help others through coaching.

Workforce Management Online, May 2010 — Register Now!

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on May 27, 2010August 9, 2018

Fork in Road for Truckers Fund; PBGC Splits Plan

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. has split the Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension Fund into plans for employees of bankrupt and nonbankrupt companies, agency spokesman Marc Hopkins confirmed.


The PBGC will provide about $4 million annually to the bankrupt companies’ multiemployer plan; the plan for the nonbankrupt companies will not receive any PBGC funding.


Neither the size of the original plan nor the sizes of the new plans were immediately available.


The decision aims to extend solvency of the original plan and preserve full benefits for roughly 3,700 workers and retirees of nonbankrupt trucking firms. About 1,500 current and former workers are in the bankrupt companies’ plan.


“The PBGC approved the move because without partition, the Chicago plan may have become insolvent in 2013, and federal benefit limits would have applied to all its retirees,” the PBGC stated in a news release. “Partition of the plan may delay insolvency to 2019 or later.”


Fifty-two employers in the original plan filed for bankruptcy protection or withdrew from the plan between 1982 and 2004. The plan currently has 57 contributing employers.


Filed by Timothy Inklebarger of Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

 

 

Posted on May 27, 2010August 9, 2018

High-Risk Pool for Uninsured Could Exceed Budget, Analysis Says

A forthcoming temporary high-risk pool for the uninsured with pre-existing health conditions could quickly go over budget, according to a new analysis.


The $5 billion program, expected to launch as soon as July, is part of the new health reform law. Its purpose is to extend temporary coverage to the uninsured until 2014, when health plan reforms, subsidies and insurance exchanges become operational.


Between 5.6 million and 7 million people could qualify for coverage through these high-risk pools, according to the National Institute for Health Care Reform, a not-for-profit health research group created by the United Auto Workers, Chrysler Group, Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Co. The institute is affiliated with the Center for Studying Health System Change.


But the $5 billion allocated to the program through 2013 would cover as few as 200,000 people annually, according to the report.


Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have agreed to run the programs, while 19 states declined, meaning the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will administer high-risk pools in those states. Two states are undecided.


“How much leeway they have to modify the outlines of the program is uncertain,” the report concludes.


Filed by Rebecca Vesely of Modern Healthcare, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.


 

Posted on May 27, 2010August 9, 2018

Proposed COBRA Subsidy Extension Cut by One Month

House Democratic leaders Wednesday night, May 26, agreed to pare back by one month an extension of federal COBRA health insurance premium subsidies to the unemployed as part of a broader effort to win support for the broader tax bill to which the COBRA provisions are attached.


With the change, the 15-month, 65 percent COBRA subsidy would be provided to employees who are involuntarily terminated through November 30.


Under the original bill, H.R. 4213, the subsidy would have been extended to employees laid off through December 31. The bill’s backers made the change in hopes of winning over fiscally conservative Democrats concerned about the bill’s overall cost.


Without an extension, employees laid off beginning June 1 would not be eligible for the subsidy. If the bill passes, observers say it is likely that lawmakers later in the year would extend the premium subsidy through at least December 31.


“Although the subsidy was pared back, I don’t think Congress would let it expire just prior to the holiday season,” said Frank McArdle, a principal in the Washington office of Hewitt Associates Inc.


The measure, which also contains provisions to give employers more time to fund their pension obligations, could be considered by the House on Thursday. The Senate has not acted on the measure.

Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

 

Posted on May 26, 2010August 9, 2018

More New Salaried Workers at Big Firms Get Defined-Contribution Plans

The largest public companies continue to steadily replace defined-benefit plans with defined-contribution or hybrid plans for new salaried employees, according to a 25-year analysis of Fortune 100 companies by Towers Watson.


Fifty-eight of the Fortune 100 companies offered only DC plans to new salaried employees this year through May 12, according to a news release from the firm. This tally includes “changes made this year and announcements of future plan changes,” the release said.


Five years ago, 37 offered only DC plans to new workers, while in 1985, 10 companies offered only DC plans to new employees.


Also, the total number of Fortune 100 companies offering DB plans (traditional or hybrid) to new salaried employees dropped to 42 this year from 90 in 1985, the news release said.


Towers Watson found that the number of Fortune 100 companies offering traditional pension plans to new salaried employees dropped sharply—to 17 this year from 89 in 1985, the news release said. However, the hybrids reached their peak at 34 in 2002 and in 2004; this year, 25 were hybrids, including cash-balance plans.


“The movement toward account-based plans appears to be steady and strong as companies shift away from traditional pensions,” Kevin Wagner, senior retirement consultant at Towers Watson, said in the release. “And while most of the shifting has been toward 401(k) plans, we are seeing employer interest in cash-balance plans, too, as the provisions of the Pension Protection Act, which creates a more friendly environment for these plans, begin to take effect.”


Towers Watson used internal surveys and information as well as public information sources—including proxies, 10-K filings and annual reports—to analyze corporate retirement plan trends from 1985 through May 12, Ed Emerman, a spokesman for Towers Watson, wrote in an e-mail response to questions.


Filed by Robert Steyer of Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on May 26, 2010August 9, 2018

Employers Preparing to Expand Wellness Efforts, Survey Finds

The costs of the health care reform law make it more important than ever that employers keep their workers healthy and motivated to adopt healthy lifestyles, a vast majority of employers said in a recent survey.


Not only did 78 percent of employers agree or somewhat agree with that statement, but most also said they are likely or very likely to create or expand corporate wellness programs as a result of an incentive provision in the new law.


Effective January 1, 2014, employers will be able to use employee wellness program rewards or penalties of up to 30 percent of the cost of individual health coverage, up from the current limit of 20 percent.


The survey conducted by the Chicago-based Midwest Business Group on Health in partnership with Business Insurance, found that 60 percent of employers are likely or very likely to create or expand their wellness programs as a result of the wellness provision, while 33 percent said they are unlikely or not very likely to do so, and 7 percent did not answer.


The survey of 1,300 employers, including MBGH members and the National Business Coalition on Health, gauged their intentions and perspectives concerning the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.


MBGH will present the survey findings this week at a health care seminar in Chicago.


Larry S. Boress, president and chief executive of MBGH, said the most significant finding of the survey is the recognition among employers of how critical the health of their employees is to the success of their companies.


“Employers have recognized that under health reform, more than ever, the investment in human capital is what they need to be looking at as opposed to thinking of benefits as just an expense of doing business,” Boress said.


The survey also found that when it comes to communicating information to employees, 52 percent are educating employees about how the law affects their benefits; 36 percent are describing what they, as the employer, plan to do; and 35 percent are explaining to employees what’s contained in the new law.


Conversely, 38 percent of the employers surveyed said they haven’t decided what to communicate to employees and 6 percent said they don’t plan to inform employees about the law.


Boress said he was not surprised by the lack of communication by employers.


“There’s so much confusion and uncertainty about what, in fact, is going on in health care and what do these rules really mean and how it’s all going to play out,” he said.


Employees are “running scared,” he said. “They don’t know if they’re going to have benefits” in the future. “In the immediate case … I think employers have an obligation to tell people what they know [about the law] and what they don’t know and start with that.”


Among other findings from the survey, “Employers Intentions and Perspective of the New Health Reform Law,” were:


• Fifty-four percent of employers said it is unlikely or not very likely that they will drop health care coverage and pay the $2,000 per employee fine as stipulated under the law. However, 18 percent said it is likely or very likely that they will consider dropping benefits.


• Employers were split as to whether they are likely to charge more for dependents as a result of a provision that extends coverage to adult children up to age 26. Forty-seven percent said they were likely or very likely to charge more for coverage, and 47 percent said they were not very likely or were unlikely to charge more.


• Seventy-four percent of employers said they were not very likely or were unlikely to reduce the number of employees working 30 to 40 hours a week as a result of the law’s requirement that they extend health care coverage to employees who work 30 or more hours a week or face penalties.


• Fifty-five percent agreed it is likely or very likely that employees will have more out-of-pocket costs or reduce their health care usage due to a $2,500 cap on employees’ annual contributions to flexible spending accounts that goes into effect in 2013. There is no limit currently, but employers typically impose limits between $4,000 and $5,000. Twenty-eight percent said the provision is not very likely or unlikely to cause employees to spend more, while 17 percent did not answer.


For more information, visit www.mbgh.org.


Filed by Sally Roberts of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on May 25, 2010August 9, 2018

Paid Sick Days, Vacations Proposed for Maids, Nannies

The Domestic Workers Bill of Rights—which stalled last year with the New York Senate coup—has re-emerged and will be brought to a vote in the state Senate on June 1.


The bill, which would provide domestic workers such as nannies and maids with paid sick days, holidays and vacation days, and require advance notice of their termination, has 26 co-sponsors, including Frank Padavan, a Republican from Queens. Proponents say 10 additional “yes” votes have been promised, including several other Republicans. There is no organized opposition to the bill.


“We’re not asking for special rights, just a set of standards that will bring domestic workers in line with every other worker that has the right of collective bargaining,” says Priscilla Gonzalez, director of Domestic Workers United, a nonprofit advocacy group.


Employers who don’t comply would be subject to civil and criminal penalties. Both the labor commissioner and attorney general could bring legal action against the employer.


Following four years of efforts by domestic workers and their advocates, the bill appeared headed to passage last year, but it was derailed by the Senate coup. A less comprehensive version of the bill passed in the Assembly. If the Senate approves the measure next week, the two versions would then be brought together via reconciliation.


Busloads of domestic workers are expected to travel from New York City to Albany to be present for the vote. The bill would be the first legislation in the nation to recognize domestic workers as a workforce and give them rights.


Filed by Daniel Massey of Crain’s New York Business, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on May 25, 2010August 9, 2018

Most Firms to Seek Early Retiree Care Subsidy

Just more than three-quarters of large employers with early retiree health care plans intend to seek partial reimbursement of claims’ costs under a program established by the federal health care reform law, according to a survey released Tuesday, May 25.


Under the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program, the government will reimburse employers for a portion of health care claims incurred by retirees who are at least age 55 but not eligible for Medicare, as well as claims incurred for retirees’ covered dependents regardless of age.


Following a plan sponsor’s application and filing of claim information, reimbursements would begin after a participant in an early retiree plan incurs $15,000 in health care claims in a plan year. After that, the government will reimburse plan sponsors for 80 percent of a participant’s claims up to $90,000 during a plan year.


In a survey of 245 large employers released Tuesday, Hewitt Associates found that 76 percent with early retiree health care plans intend to seek reimbursement under the program.


Hewitt estimates that the reimbursement could amount to between $2,000 and $3,000 per pre-65 adult enrolled in their plans, or about 25 to 35 percent of total plan costs. Whether employers will collect that much remains to be seen.


That’s because only $5 billion has been authorized for the program and the money could run out fast. Reimbursement will be provided on a first-come, first-serve basis.


“Because so many companies plan to apply for the ERRP, employers will need to act quickly to secure a share of the proceeds, since the federal funds earmarked for this program are limited,” Milind Desai, a senior consulting actuary in Hewitt’s Waltham, Massachusetts, office, said in a statement.


Sixty-six percent of employers said they have not decided how they would use the proceeds, as they await regulatory guidance.


“Most employers are still looking for more details about how these funds can and cannot be used,” John Grosso, a senior consulting actuary in Hewitt’s Norwalk, Connecticut, office, said in a statement.


In general, the reimbursement must be used to reduce employers’ and/or retirees’ health care costs.


Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on May 25, 2010August 9, 2018

Xerox Unit Buys Outsourcing Unit From Hewlett-Packard

A unit of Xerox Corp. said Tuesday, May 25, that it is buying a benefits and human resources outsourcing unit from Hewlett-Packard Co. for $125 million.


A spokesman for Dallas-based Affiliated Computer Services Inc. said its purchase of ExcellerateHRO is expected to close this summer.


“This acquisition clearly demonstrates Xerox’s commitment to invest in human resources that will ultimately benefit all our clients,” Ann Vezina, ACS executive vice president and group president of ACS Human Resources Services, said in a statement.


ExcellerateHRO, which does not disclose revenue, currently has 350 to 400 clients and about 1,800 employees.


The benefits and HR outsourcing operation was formed in 2005 by then-Towers Perrin and EDS Corp., combining Towers Perrin’s benefit administration services and EDS’ payroll and HR-related outsourcing services. EDS held a roughly 85 percent share in ExcellerateHRO, and Towers Perrin owned the rest.


In 2008, HP acquired EDS and its interest in ExcellerateHRO.


In June 2009, Towers Perrin, which merged this year with Watson Wyatt Worldwide to form Towers Watson, sold its minority share to HP.


ACS’ purchase of ExcellerateHRO is its first since Xerox acquired it in February in a deal valued at $6.4 billion.


Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 … Page 416 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress