Skip to content

Workforce

Author: Site Staff

Posted on January 14, 2010August 31, 2018

First Lady Michelle Obama Promotes Work-Life Balance

First lady Michelle Obama urged companies to implement policies that will help their employees better balance work and family obligations during an appearance at the Department of Labor on Thursday, January 14.


In an address to about 400 Labor Department employees, Obama also promoted legislation that would guarantee paid sick leave, a measure that has generated concern among HR organizations in Washington.


Obama has been touring government agencies during President Barack Obama’s first year in office, giving pep talks to staff members.


At the Labor Department, Obama touched on an issue that has been central to her professional life—simultaneously managing the demands of home and the workplace.


Obama achieved success as a Chicago lawyer while her husband built his political career. They also started a family, having two girls, Sasha and Malia, who are now in grade school.


Drawing parallels to other working mothers, Obama called herself a “120-percenter.”


“So when I was at work during these times, I always felt like I was shortchanging my girls,” she said. “But then when I was at home, I was worried that I was letting people at work down. And with that kind of anxiety comes a lot of additional stress and a whole lot of guilt.”


Such worries undermine work performance, Obama said. She argued that flextime, telecommuting and paid time off produces happier employees and more profitable companies.


“Instead of spending all day at work worrying about what’s happening at home, they have the support that they need to concentrate on their jobs,” Obama said.


Although many employers have established good work/life benefits, too many Americans don’t have access to flexibility policies, Obama said.


“Staying home to care for a sick child or taking an elderly parent to a doctor’s appointment shouldn’t mean risking one’s job,” Obama said. “Things like paid family leave and sick days and affordable child care should be the norm, not the exception.”


She said that 40 percent of private-sector employees work for companies that don’t provide paid sick days. She endorsed the Healthy Families Act, a bill that would enable employees to earn up to seven paid sick days per year to care for themselves or a loved one.


“We are happy that we have a president and a secretary of the Department of Labor who had the vision and the foresight to see that this now needs to happen,” Obama said.


The Society for Human Resource Management and other HR organizations have expressed concerns that the measure could undermine paid-time-off programs that companies currently have in place.


SHRM is promoting a leave concept that would protect companies from federal leave mandates if they offer PTO.


Following her speech, Obama visited the Labor Department’s Child Development Center. The facility provides day care for the children of department employees and area families.


“As a parent, I know centers like this one create a great deal of peace of mind,” Obama said. “That means that you can focus on your work and not worry about whether your kids are doing OK.”


Obama fielded questions about her daughters from an exuberant group of 5-year-olds before reading them the Dr. Seuss story Green Eggs & Ham.


—Mark Schoeff Jr.



Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on January 14, 2010August 31, 2018

Deal Struck on Taxing of Cadillac Health Plans

Labor leaders struck a deal Thursday, January 14, with Democrats that would help unionized workers and retirees avoid an excise tax on high-cost health care plans, clearing a major political hurdle for the passage of health care reform.


Employer groups have also opposed the tax and said that the deal would benefit unionized workers at the expense of nonunion employees.


The bill would exempt the so-called “Cadillac” plans attained through collective bargaining; Taft-Hartley multiemployer plans; and all employees who are part of a state-employer health plan from being taxed until January 2018.


The agreement would raise the threshold at which benefits would face a 40 percent tax to $24,000 for family plans from the $23,000 passed in the Senate health reform bill, said AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka during a conference call with reporters Thursday. The threshold for individual plans, formerly at $8,000, would be raised by a similar amount.


Beginning in 2015, dental and vision benefits would be excluded from a plan’s taxable value.


“I think we’ve made some changes for middle-class America that I think will be very, very beneficial,” said Trumka, who was joined by leaders of major labor unions to announce the deal. “We don’t look at this as the end of that fight for real reform, but another step along the way to real reform.”


The plan would also raise the tax threshold for older Americans and for women, who tend to have higher health care costs than men do. That provision would be applicable to all plans.


The deal maintains a raised threshold for employees in high-risk professions, such as police and firefighters. And it would maintain the higher taxable threshold for plans in states where health care costs are higher. The threshold for plans in those states would be 120 percent of the maximum, an amount that would be phased downward beginning in 2014.


The deal would also allow health plans of unions, multiemployer plans and retiree plans run by voluntary employee beneficiary associations to purchase insurance on the health insurance exchanges beginning in 2017.


Employers say the deal raises concerns of fairness for nonunion workers.


“It will give a huge advantage to unionized plans over nonunionized employers,” said James Gelfand, senior manager for health policy at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.


While employers have opposed the tax on the grounds it would hurt employees, the tentative deal would ultimately reduce the amount of money the excise tax would raise to help pay for the nearly $1 trillion health care bill.


The tax as originally detailed would have raised $150 billion toward paying for health care. Labor leaders said the changes would reduce revenue by $60 billion.


“One of the concerns we all have right now is how much revenue is lost,” says Martin Reiser, chairman of the National Coalition on Benefits, an organization composed of 200 employers and employer groups—including Xerox, UPS and Target—and such organizations as the American Benefits Council, the National Association of Manufacturers and America’s Health Insurance Plans. “I think these changes are all positive. But what are they going to do to make up that lost revenue?”


Legislators are expected to send the new details to the Congressional Budget Office to determine the impact on the bill’s total cost. President Barack Obama has vowed to sign a bill that does not increase the federal deficit.


New revenue could be raised by increasing a 5.4 percent tax on high-income earners and extending the tax to investment income, sources say.


Labor leaders were able to increase the rate at which the threshold would grow with inflation, but concerns remain among employers that more people will face taxes on benefits if health care prices continue to widely outpace inflation.


The new deal would raise the taxable threshold to the Consumer Price Index plus one. Labor leaders said that if health care inflation grew faster than expected from 2010 to 2013, the taxable threshold also would grow.


Generally, the politics of reconciling the health reform bills passed separately by the House and Senate favor the Senate, since its 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority must remain intact for any plan to pass.


As a result, observers say many of the elements in the House bill are likely to die, including a government-run insurance plan known as the public option and an employer mandate to provide insurance or face up to an 8 percent tax on payroll. In its place would be a so-called “free rider” penalty against employers with employees who receive federal subsidies to pay for health care.


—Jeremy Smerd 



Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on January 13, 2010August 31, 2018

Chrysler Rushes to Hire as It Refills Product Pipeline

Chrysler Group has hired at least 600 engineers—and will hire more—to refill the product pipeline emptied during the last three years of corporate turmoil and bankruptcy.


“I need bodies to make these cars,” Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne said at the Detroit Auto Show on Monday, January 11.


Chrysler has already hired 400 engineers in engineering design and an additional 200 in quality, Chrysler executives said. The new hires are a mix of company and contract employees.


The engineers will primarily adapt Fiat platforms to vehicles that will sell under the Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram brands in North America starting in 2012. 



Filed by Bradford Wernle of Automotive News, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.



 

Posted on January 13, 2010August 31, 2018

TOOL: Database on Aging and Work

Responding to demand for access the latest national and international facts on aging and work, the Sloan Center on Aging & Work at Boston College has made its online fact database public.

The Aging & Work Facts resource has more than 1,700 statistics on workforce trends for employers, scholars, legislators, policy analysts and the press. Facts are selected from the center’s own research, journal articles and reports published by nonprofit and for-profit agencies and organizations. Each fact is coded with one or more topics for ease of searching in the database. Graphs are also included.

Posted on January 12, 2010August 31, 2018

U.S. Chamber Chief Warns Against Attaching EFCA to Jobs Bill

While organized labor pushes for action early this year on a bill that would make it easier for workers to form a union, a major business organization is warning Congress not to attach it to jobs legislation.


As soon as the House and Senate settle on a final health care reform bill and send it to President Barack Obama—a process that could take until February—the next item on the legislative agenda could be a measure designed to put people back to work and strengthen the safety net for those who have been laid off.


In December, the House approved a $154 billion bill that would redirect money from a program to stabilize the financial industry and allocate it for infrastructure projects and the extension of unemployment and health insurance subsidies.


Speculation has started in Washington that when the Senate takes up a similar measure, it will attach the Employee Free Choice Act—a bill that would allow the creation of a union when a majority of workers sign cards authorizing one.


“It would be a bad idea to put a card-check bill on a jobs bill—the yin and the yang,” said Thomas Donohue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, at a press briefing Tuesday, January 12. “And, yes, we would oppose it.”


Labor and business advocates have been battling over EFCA for the last year. Unions assert that as more workers organize, they will increase their leverage to secure higher wages and benefits. Currently, 7 percent of private sector is unionized.


Business groups like the Chamber of Commerce argue that EFCA would raise labor costs and reduce workplace flexibility at the worst time—while businesses are struggling to come out of the recession.


The bill was introduced in March but has been stalled as supporters try to bring enough moderate Senate Democrats on board to overcome a Republican filibuster.


In a speech at the National Press Club in Washington on Monday, January 11, AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka predicted that EFCA would be approved during the first quarter of 2010.


“We must do it now—not next year, not even this summer. Now,” Trumka said.


Donohue dismissed Trumka’s forecast.


“With everything going on in this country, with an election coming up in 2010, you’re not going to get the votes to pass that legislation as it’s written in this quarter or in any other quarter between now and the election,” Donohue said.


It’s not clear whether the idea to attach EFCA to a jobs bill is gaining support on Capitol Hill—or even across the labor community. Although the AFL-CIO is putting an emphasis on the jobs bill and wants to see quick action on EFCA, there’s no evidence that the two are being linked.


“I’ve not heard anybody create that marriage yet,” said a union consultant who didn’t want to be identified.


Whether it moves as part of broader legislation or as a stand-alone bill, EFCA will stoke controversy. The bill, along with the Department of Labor’s proposed regulatory agenda, is creating uncertainty for business that hampers job creation, according to Donohue.


“We fought these ill-conceived policies successfully last year,” Donohue said. “We’ll pull out all the stops to do it again.”


—Mark Schoeff Jr.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on January 12, 2010August 31, 2018

Staffing Firms Among 750 Sued in Ensemble Chimes Global Bankruptcy Case

Some 750 lawsuits have been filed against staffing firms and others regarding outstanding claims in the bankruptcy case of defunct vendor management system provider Ensemble Chimes Global and its former parent company, Axium International Inc., according to the bankruptcy trustee.


The deadline for filing suit was January 8.


Some staffing firms are among the defendants in the 750 lawsuits that stem from “inquiries/demand letters for preference” mailed last year. The letters sought monies paid out by ECG and Axium back to 90 days before it filed for bankruptcy. Under bankruptcy law, those payments may have to be returned.


Ensemble Chimes at one time operated the largest vendor management system before filing for bankruptcy in January 2008 shortly after its parent company, Axium International Inc., abruptly ran out of money and filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which is liquidation rather than reorganization. That resulted in a swift dismantling of the company.


What remained of Ensemble Chimes was sold out of bankruptcy January 23, 2008, followed by the rest of Axium a week later.


Bankruptcy trustee Howard Ehrenberg said $2 million in settlements have already been reached in the Ensemble Chimes bankruptcy case from the demand letters for preference, although the amount represents only a small portion of the total possible claims.


Often the cases were settled for much less than the initial demand letters. The 750 lawsuits were filed against companies that didn’t respond to the demand letters for preference or did not settle.


Ehrenberg said the 750 lawsuits seek tens of millions of dollars; however, some defendants might have offsets that would reduce their exposure.


Ehrenberg also said a settlement was recently reached with GoldenTree Asset Management, a former lender to Axium.


As a result, Ehrenberg said, GoldenTree will provide the bankruptcy estate with:


• $8.5 million in cash.


• A former Axium building at 210 Victory Blvd. in Burbank, California.


• Its majority interest in claims against Axium’s former auditors, BDO Seidman.


GoldenTree will also waive its claims against the estate for assets in the trustee’s possession.


Money recovered from the GoldenTree settlement will be used to help pay creditors’ claims.



Filed by Staffing Industry Analysts, a sister company of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.



 

Posted on January 12, 2010August 31, 2018

Illinois Manufacturing Lost 52,000 Jobs, 700 Firms Last Year

The manufacturing industry in Illinois suffered one of its worst declines in nearly a century between November 2008 and November 2009, according to the Illinois Manufacturers Directory.


In the midst of the recession, 51,925 industrial jobs were lost and 709 manufacturing companies shut down in Illinois during the period, the directory reported Monday, January 11. That’s twice the previous year’s decline.


In Chicago, industrial jobs fell 8 percent to about 114,000.


“The country has suffered deep losses in manufacturing employment due to automation and technology, outsourcing and the recession,” said Tom Dubin, president of Manufacturers’ News, which publishes the directory.
 
Hardest hit were industries related to construction and housing. The furniture-fixture industry saw the sharpest drop in jobs, 12.5 percent, followed by wood products.


Machinery—the largest category, and one dominated by Peoria-based Caterpillar Inc. and Moline-based Deere & Co.—saw jobs shrink 6.9 percent. Employment in fabricated metals, the second-biggest sector, fell 5.1 percent to 100,626 jobs. Food products, the No. 3 segment, saw a drop of 2.1 percent, according to the directory.


Also suffering steep drop-offs were transportation equipment, falling 9.7 percent; printing, which dropped 9.5 percent; and textiles and apparel, which slid 9.2 percent. 



Filed by John Pletz of Crain’s Chicago Business, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.



 

Posted on January 8, 2010January 27, 2020

CDC Urges Swine Flu Vaccinations

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Thursday, January 7, urged Americans of all ages to get vaccinated against the swine flu, saying it wanted to prevent a possible resurgence of the disease in the coming weeks and months.

Though supplies of the H1N1 swine flu vaccine were sporadic during peak flu activity this fall, health officials said there are now enough shots for widespread inoculations.

Health officials said they had 136 million doses available for ordering by the states to supplement what they described as an already ample supply of the vaccine. States could then disburse the medicine to county health departments, doctor offices, hospitals and retail clinics. Most employers with physician-run work-site health clinics would also be eligible to receive the vaccine.

Sixty million people already have been inoculated, but health officials said they wanted to remain vigilant to prevent a resurgence of the flu in the coming weeks and months.

Dr. Anne Schuchat, director of immunization and respiratory disease for the CDC, said the nation faced a similar situation during a flu pandemic at the end of 1957 when health officials saw a decrease in flu activity and stopped encouraging further inoculations. The deadly flu returned with a vengeance in early 1958.

“They had vaccine, but they didn’t encourage its use and yet they did go on to see that increase in mortality,” Schuchat told reporters during a conference call Thursday.

Schuchat said it was not clear whether swine flu would return but that further inoculations were warranted to prevent people from getting sick. Young children, adults with respiratory illnesses and seniors in particular should get the shot, she said.

Flu activity peaked in late October but remains above normal levels, officials said.

—Jeremy Smerd

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on January 6, 2010August 31, 2018

Appeals Court Adjusts Overtime Rules for Insurer’s Employees

Government Employees Insurance Corp., the Berkshire Hathaway Inc. unit known as GEICO, does not have to pay overtime to its auto damage adjusters, a federal appeals court ruled.


A three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Tuesday, January 5, made the ruling in overturning a trial court finding in the consolidated cases of Jerome Robinson-Smith v. Government Employees Insurance Corp. and Christine Lindsay v. Government Employees Insurance Corp.


The plaintiffs sued GEICO seeking overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The act typically requires time-and-one-half pay for working more than 40 hours per week.


GEICO considers auto adjusters exempt. But the plaintiffs, who were joined by hundreds of others, argued that adjusters do not exercise sufficient discretion and independent judgment to qualify as employees exempt from overtime pay.


In December 2008, the trial court agreed and granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs, court records show.


But the appeals court agreed with GEICO, saying in the recent ruling that the primary duty of GEICO auto damage adjusters involves exercising discretion and independent judgment.


The appeals court remanded the case and directed the court to rule for GEICO and conduct further proceedings.



Filed by Roberto Ceniceros of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.



 

Posted on January 6, 2010August 31, 2018

TOOL Sample Anti-Discrimination Policy

The document, from law firm Littler Mendelson and ethics and compliance training company ELT, covers prohibited discrimination, reporting procedures, retaliation and enforcement. It should be customized for the organization to which it would apply. Its authors note: “This is a sample policy only and does not constitute and is not a substitution for consultation with legal counsel. The law in this area constantly changes and must be reviewed before implementing any policy in this regard. This sample policy should not be implemented or executed except on the advice of counsel.” View the sample policy here.


The ELT site also has a 50-state survey of discrimination laws.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 … Page 416 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress