Skip to content

Workforce

Tag: employee engagement

Posted on June 24, 2001June 29, 2023

Meditation and Mindfulness at Sounds True

It’s an overcast March morning and Adam Mentzell, director of human resources for Sounds True, is discussing the painful experience of laying off 15 percent of his company’s workforce last summer.

meditation and mindfulness

“What did I learn from it?” he asks. “I learned that people are tremendously capable of dealing with hardship. If you hire mature people and treat them well, they can be very resilient.”

As Mentzell finishes his last sentence, the alarm on his sports watch starts beeping. He excuses himself, walks to his desk, switches his telephone to the intercom mode, and strikes a small brass bell sitting next to the phone. He strikes the bell three times, creating low, calming tones that resonate throughout the company’s offices.

“Sorry about that,” Mentzell says as he sits back down to explain that the bell is rung at precisely 11:00 each day to call employees to group meditation — which he usually observes — or to practice 15 minutes of silence. The bell of mindfulness, as he calls it, is a way of reminding employees to slow down and become more present and aware.

Meditation? Mindfulness? These aren’t words normally discussed by corporate HR people. But at Sounds True, it’s fitting that the bell of mindfulness was rung during a conversation about downsizing, for this is a company that deals with all the routine struggles of a growing business, including layoffs, but does so with an eye — and heart — toward the human side of work life.

Sounds True is an audio publishing company based in Louisville, Colorado, a town located 20 miles northwest of Denver along the Front Range of Colorado’s Rocky Mountains. The privately held company was started in 1985 by Tami Simon, a 22-year-old woman who had a $30,000 inheritance and a vision to disseminate spiritual wisdom.

Today, Sounds True is a $9.3 million company that produces spoken-word audio tapes and CDs on topics related to world religion, psychology, and alternative medicine. The company boasts a catalog of more than 500 titles, including Women Who Run with the Wolves, by Clarissa Pinkola Estes, Energy Anatomy, by Caroline Myss, and Breathing: The Master Key to Self-Healing, by Andrew Weil, M.D. In 16 years, Sounds True has grown from a one-person labor of love into a 60-employee enterprise. Along the way, the challenge has always been how to maintain the company’s spiritual focus — and spiritual integrity — while also responding to the gritty, mortal demands of business.

At first glance, Sounds True does seem different from most buttoned-down corporate settings. Walk toward the company’s main entrance and you’ll pass a serene white marble statue of an angel. Once you’re inside, a golden retriever will click across the lobby and greet you. And as you tour the quiet offices, you’ll find employees wearing fleece and khaki and hiking boots. They work alongside rippling desktop fountains, or to the accompaniment of bamboo flutes, or underneath warm reading lamps.

But these are just superficial differences. Within this casual, fleecy environment, employees also have to negotiate contracts, meet deadlines, fulfill orders, and generate profits just like any other corporate workforce. How does Sounds True balance the realities of competitive corporate life — profit goals, employee conflict, and customer demands — with its goal to promote spiritual wisdom? How does the company instill self-awareness in employees alongside the requisite business awareness?

Spend a day with Mentzell and you’ll learn that the company’s desire to create an aware workplace is much like an individual’s attempt to find spiritual wisdom: it’s something that needs continual attention. Just as there is no path to permanent spiritual enlightenment — faith and spirituality being ongoing disciplines — there is also no such thing as an unwavering workplace culture.

The best that Sounds True or any HR department can do is to be continuously mindful of those things that contribute to a positive working environment: hiring the right employees, adhering to core values, and conducting business in a way that fosters both individual awareness and business accountability. Simply stated, creating cultural wisdom is a discipline, not a destination, a discipline that might best be called enlightened leadership.

Hiring: It’s not just a job
The path to enlightened HR starts with hiring, and fortunately, Sounds True is one of those lucky companies that attracts people with a natural affinity for their products. Just as techies head to Microsoft, metaphysically focused people gravitate toward Sounds True, supplying the small company with about 20 unsolicited résumés a week. “We attract employees who want to work in a different kind of way,” Mentzell says.

But even though many people have an interest in working for the company, it’s the job of Mentzell and other managers to make sure that those who are hired fully understand and embrace the company’s mission. “In key positions, such as those in the editorial department, it’s imperative that employees have a deep connection to our product line,” he says. This means recruiting people with education and experience in world religions, and having them demonstrate that knowledge both orally and in writing.

For most of the company’s positions, however, religious knowledge is not as important as the right skill set, which is determined by past experience; the ability to communicate honestly and respectfully, which is assessed through a series of team interviews; and support for the overall mission. The last criterion is trickier to assess, because the mission is spiritual and it’s illegal to ask questions about religion in interviews. How does Mentzell determine whether candidates will uphold the mission to disseminate spiritual wisdom? By asking them to listen to taped products, review the catalog, and visit the company Web site.

“During follow-up interviews, I ask a series of open-ended questions about the candidate’s reaction to our products and ask whether or not it is a problem for them that Sounds True produces products from a wide variety of wisdom traditions and schools of thought,” he says. “Rather than looking for adherents, we are looking for capable people who do not have a problem with our material and support our overall mission.”

Sounds True
Interview Questions
  1. How will you make contributions to our core values?
  2. If you were hired and we could jump ahead six months, what do you think we would be saying about how you helped forward our core values?
  3. What core aspirations excite you or interest you?
  4. Why in the world do you want to work here?
  5. Tell me what is important to you — what do you value deeply?
  6. Tell me about the last time you lost your cool. What was the cause? What action did you take? What did you learn?
  7. What are your expectations from an employer? Name at least four.
  8. Tell me about a specific situation when you were disappointed by an employer or manager.
  9. Whom do you admire? Why?
  10. Tell me about a time when you were overwhelmed at work. What was the cause? What action did you take? What did you learn that you can carry forward?
  11. What in your history are you most proud of and why?
  12. Conversely, what in your work history do you regret the most and why?
  13. What do you understand the mission of the company to be?

The interest of spiritual seekers in working for Sounds True, combined with the company’s diligent hiring practices, makes it possible for the culture to be almost self-generating. Case in point: Three years ago, the company hired a longtime customer to manage its warehouse, a department where profanity and gruffness are the norm in most companies, Sounds True included. The new manager, thanks to his long-term interest in Sounds True products, used professional language, treated employees with respect, and lived the company’s value system. “He changed the way the warehouse was run not by dictating change, but by setting a good example,” Mentzell says.

Honesty, openness, and accountability
Let’s face it. Even if companies hire the right people, the ugly demands of business have a way of inflicting pain and uncertainty on even the wisest and most aware individuals. How does Sounds True make sure that employees don’t revert to nasty reactive behavior in the wake of tough business demands? They do it by adhering to company values. Sure, many companies pay heed to the importance of values. But at Sounds True, the company’s 20 values are integrated into daily business practices — with the emphasis on the word “practice.”

“One thing we are clear about is that our work is a work in progress,” Mentzell says. “We have set aspirations that we continually strive for, but sometimes we fall short of our goals.”

The guiding principles underlying all of Sounds True’s values are mindfulness, honesty, and kindness. “These are the spiritual or wisdom qualities that are taught on the tapes we publish, so we also want to live them in our own work lives,” says company president Tami Simon.

Let’s start with the practice of mindfulness, which Mentzell describes as the art of paying attention and seeing things in a fresh and non-habitual manner. Sounds True promotes mindfulness by encouraging employees to stop what they are doing and become aware of their thought patterns. This is done through the 11:00 call to meditation, by providing an on-site meditation room, and by opening every large staff meeting with a two-minute period of silence. “This contemplative space provides the opportunity, if only for a moment, for employees to set aside their individual agendas,” Mentzell explains.

The ability to set aside individual agendas allows employees to fully engage in the second guiding principle: honest and open communication. “In many companies, people waste a lot of time through backstabbing and office politics,” Simon notes. “This happens because people don’t trust each other.” She believes that the only way to foster trust is to promote open communication, even if employees don’t always like what they hear.

Sounds True encourages open communication in several ways. First, every Monday morning, employees gather in the lobby to discuss business issues with the management team. During this time, employees can ask any manager, including the president, pointed questions about budgets, the hiring processes, whatever. “Tami has admitted to making mistakes on more than one occasion,” Mentzell says.

Second, the company makes extensive use of peer-review processes that allow team members to provide direct feedback to coworkers about how they may be affecting others. Upward review processes are also used to give managers anonymous feedback from those they manage.

Third, the company promotes collaborative decision-making so that managers jointly make key business decisions, and departmental teams determine their own best way of working together. The only way to arrive at mutually beneficial decisions is for managers and employees to engage in honest communication.

Is there any downside to having such an open and honest culture? “Oh my god, yes,” Simon says. “People who are used to being in corporate environments where there is more strategic game playing don’t always make it here.” Why? “Because it often takes a while for people to realize that honesty, even if it pinches, can lead to much higher levels of trust. Some people just don’t make it that far.

“Many people here are very genuine, and they expect you to be genuine, too. If you are a person who doesn’t want to bring your emotional life to work, you may think that coworkers are poking at you to find out what’s going on in your life.”

Tim Bucher, a recently hired network administrator in Sounds True’s IT department, agrees with Simon. “I had wary thoughts coming in,” he admits. “I was used to a large corporate structure, and I was a bit intimidated by how different the culture was here. Now, I’m used to it. I don’t have to work to weed out truth from lies, because everybody here is so honest.”

The other guiding principle embedded in all of Sounds True’s values is kindness, which simply means respecting others and honoring individual differences. The company honors individual differences through such practices as a nonexistent dress code, flexible working hours, and allowing employees to bring their dogs to work.

Sounds True Values
  1. Sounds True is both mission-driven and profit-driven.
  2. We build workplace community.
  3. We encourage authenticity in the workplace.
  4. Open communication.
  5. Animals are welcome.
  6. We place a high value on creativity, innovation, and ideas.
  7. Opportunities exist for flexible work schedules.
  8. Teams determine the best way to reach their goals.
  9. We honor and include a contemplative dimension in the workplace.
  10. We reach out to a diverse community.
  11. We strive to protect and preserve the Earth.
  12. We have a relationship with our customers that is based on integrity.
  13. We take time for kindness, have fun, and get a lot done.
  14. We acknowledge that every person in the organization carries wisdom.
  15. We encourage people to speak up and propose solutions.
  16. We encourage people to listen deeply.
  17. We honor individual differences and diversity.
  18. We strive for clarity of expectations.
  19. We encourage people to realize their creative potential.
  20. Employees participate in profit sharing and ownership.

A complete description of each Sounds True value can be found on the company’s Web site, www.soundstrue.com.

Building financial acumen
In a company driven by spiritual values, capitalistic concerns such as cost and profit easily can become secondary. Such was the case at Sounds True last year, when the company tried to expand in too many different directions at once and ultimately lost money for the first time in 15 years.

Smarting from the loss, the company was forced to lay off employees in unprofitable divisions and also pay stricter attention to financial concerns. This upset a few longtime employees, who felt that the company was “selling out” to capitalism and chose to leave on their own.

“We had to work to create business-mindedness,” Simon explains. “For 15 years the people who worked here did not pay much attention to the critical drivers of financial success such as cost of goods, margins on product lines, and product formats.”

“What we had to communicate to remaining employees,” Mentzell adds, “is that our mission to disseminate spiritual wisdom is not possible unless the company can also pay its bills.”

To make sure that employees are conscious of the relevant measures of financial performance, Sounds True launched an open-book management program called the Great Game of Business, wherein all employees were trained in financial literacy. Today, department representatives provide weekly forecasts against their specific budgets and then present this information in bimonthly business “scoreboard” meetings. All managers are in attendance at this fast-moving meeting and are expected to report financial information to their teams immediately afterward.

“Information on our performance against budget quickly travels to all areas of the organization,” Mentzell explains. This raises employee awareness of financial measures and stimulates employees to take corrective action when necessary.

Although speaking freely about finances has helped the company get back on track, there are some risks involved. “There is a certain kind of anxiety introduced in an environment where people know all about the business and its accompanying uncertainties,” Simon explains. “In companies where the executive team acts like parents who withhold difficult information from workers, people are protected from this anxiety. But I think that approach gives people a false sense of safety. Here, employees may feel anxious about finances more of the time, but at least everyone knows where they stand.”

The role of HR
It may come as no surprise that Sounds True’s HR director personally embodies the company’s mission. On the door of Mentzell’s office are in and outboxes marked with the signs: Breathing IN I feel calm; Breathing OUT I smile. “I’ve been on my own spiritual quest for 10 years,” he says, adding that he not only meditates regularly but also is a serious student of Western psychology and Eastern religion and philosophy.

Mentzell’s personal connection to the company’s mission helps him to be mindful of the never-ending work involved in creating an aware culture. As HR director, an unusual position in a company of this size, he oversees hiring, mediates disputes, communicates financial results, negotiates benefits, and trains managers. He reports directly to the CEO. “I’m responsible for how management happens here,” he says. Other than that, most of Mentzell’s job is typical HR: recruitment, benefits, compensation, performance reviews, and training.

“I’m surprised how much of my job is routine,” he says, almost sheepishly.

It could be routine because Sounds True is as mindful of human needs as it is of business needs, although Mentzell would be the first to say that maintaining the balance between financial and human goals is not easy. Shift too far in one direction and business suffers. Shift too far in the other and morale withers. But by staying aware that both goals are important — and by integrating that awareness into daily business practices — Sounds True has been able to weather hard times.

“Enlightened HR?” Mentzell asks. “Sounds True should not be portrayed as having figured it out, but merely striving to find a better way of doing business.”

Workforce, June 2001, pp. 40-46 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on January 31, 2001October 24, 2019

Thirteen Alternatives to Downsizing

Research by Workforce and by others has shown that many companies that downsize end up with less productivity or less revenue than when they started. Here are several alternatives to consider.

Long-term Staffing Alternatives

  1. Hiring Linking to Vision
    The organization identifies the skills that will be needed to meet its goals, assuring that it is recruiting and hiring people who can meet future challenges.
  2. Cross Training
    By understanding the skill mix of staff today and linking it to the skills needed in the future, the organization allows individual employees to determine what they need to do in order to remain employed.
  3. Succession Planning
    Rather than leaving succession planning to chance, HR should work with line managers to identify likely candidates possessing the types of management and technical skills it needs in various positions.
  4. Redeployment Within the Organization
    Successful redeployment requires (1) a sophisticated career management process so that managers and employees are aware of open positions, and (2) career assessment and development activities that allow people to get ready for positions.
  5. Creating Value-added and Revenue-enhancing Opportunities
    This is an “Employee Buy Out” within the organization where a group of employees create a new business or line of service that the company can market.

Cost-Saving Strategies

  1. A Comprehensive Model
    Automakers, as well as other industries in Japan, have adopted a series of steps they use as an alternative to downsizing. If the first step doesn’t get the needed savings, they move to the next. Areas of focus include compensation, hours, wages and placement.
  2. Reduced Hours
    A policy is established that either places everyone in a particular job category on a flexible working arrangement or creates a flex-pool made up of volunteers from the department. The goal is to reduce the number of hours worked by each employee.
  3. Lower Wages
    Wages are reduced in order to save money.
  4. Attrition
    Waiting for people to retire or leave on their own can occur either through natural attrition or by offering voluntary retirement or similar packages.
  5. Alternative Placement
    Offer early retirement incentives to pension-eligible employees in a specific area.
  6. Leave of Absence
    People are offered a leave of absence with full benefits for a specified period of time to help an organization weather a downturn. Although people are promised a job upon completion of the leave, it may not be the same job or at the same pay level.
  7. Employee Buy-Outs
    The company allows employees to buy the operation that was slated for closing and set up their own businesses.
  8. Shared Ownership
    The company allows employees to trade pay increases or pay cuts in return for company stock.
Posted on June 23, 2000January 13, 2020

I’m Important, You’re Important, We’re All Important

When I spent two years interviewing people about their work and workplaces, the concept of “self-worth” came up time and again. “I don’t feel important.” “I’m a worker bee.” “I’m just not valued.”

Worth emerged as such a dominant theme that it’s on my list of the 22 keys to a meaningful workplace.

No, worth can’t be measured like ROI or turnover. But it sure as heck can be increased. Below are some thought-provoking ideas and reminders for nurturing a stronger sense of self-worth among employees in your workplace. I hope you’ll print the list and use it to stir conversation, discovery, and action.

1. Those hallway “hellos” really do matter. Make them count.

2. Someone somewhere in your organization has the answer to that problem you’ve been struggling with. Turn off your computer, and surf the sea of knowledge that surrounds you.

3. We’re obsessed with knowledge, skills, and abilities. Shouldn’t we also tap into our deep interests?

4. Internal competition always produces at least one loser, which is one too many. Especially when we’re the loser.

5. The fancy award dinners and wall plaques aren’t essential. This is: “thank you.”

6. Let’s have a month when everyone is named employee of the month.

7. Co-creation may be the most time-intensive, frustrating, exhausting, and surest way to foster true empowerment and a deep sense of worth.

8. People are moved by compelling missions–not by run-on mission statements.

9. Plenty of organizations have complaint departments, complaint forms, and complaint-resolution personnel. Will someone please create a compliment department?

10. Who should have easy access to all customer input? Easy answer: everyone.

11. Employee attitude surveys are an exercise in tree-killing unless they’re used to generate rich dialogue and focused action. Save a tree: Just say no to employee surveys that are destined for a dusty shelf.

12. Okay, it’s a cliché, but it’s so true: Respect takes years to nurture, but it can be destroyed in seconds.

13. Can you cite one example of a performance evaluation that truly informs, inspires, and energizes?

14. Few people expect high pay. Everyone expects fair pay.

15. For years, we’ve used terms like boss, subordinate, my people, your people, and upper-level. Should we be surprised that some employees feel like second-class workplace citizens?

16. Space matters. If some people are jammed into tiny cubicles while others get cavernous offices, what kind of message is being sent?

17. If you don’t think Dilbert is funny, you need to worry.

18. If you think you’re turning into Dilbert, you really need to worry.

19. If your workplace is a Dilbertesque universe, engage in random acts of positive change management. Focus on the one positive thing you can do instead of the 100 things you can’t do.

20. If you’re unwilling to do a thing about it, stop off at the local office-supply store, buy some resumé paper, and get busy. A better situation awaits–but only if you seek it out and seize it.

Other columns by Tom Terez:

  • How to Create Your Own Kitty Hawk
  • Do You Know Your KASSIs?
  • Your Schedule vs. Your Mission
  • The Misguided Nerf Ball
  • Tips on Team-Building: Read This Before You Crash in the Desert!
  • The Promise and Peril of Mission and Vision
  • Creating a Workplace With Flexibility
  • Getting and Giving Respect
  • The Challenge of “Challenge”
  • Can We Talk?
  • Making the Most of Acknowledgment

 

Posted on April 20, 2000June 29, 2023

Sample Performance Review for Non-exempt Employees

performance measurement, performance appraisal

This form must be written in ink or typewritten

 

PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND EVALUATION

Name:
Position:

Location:
Department:

 

 

This review covers the period from __________to __________

The performance review and evaluation process requires the supervisor to do the following:

    1. Clearly establish the areas of responsibility for the job.
    2. Establish expectations, standards or objectives for the work to be done during the next review period.
    3. Periodically review progress with the subordinate concerning how well expectations were met. Maintain on-going documentation of performance.
    4. Annually review and evaluate performance.

The key to this process is clear communication between the supervisor and subordinate.

The objective of the entire process is to ensure that all employees understand:

    1. What they are to do;
    2. What the standards are by which they will be measured;
    3. How they are progressing; and
    4. What their evaluation is at the end of the review period.

Document the employee’s performance and select a rating (1-4, defined at the bottom of this document) for factors listed below:

 

Quality of Work — Consider the accuracy, thoroughness, and neatness of work performed.

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

 

Productivity — Consider the amount and timelines of satisfactory work completed and whether the employee consistently meets established or reasonable deadlines.

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

 

Interpersonal Skills — Consider the employee’s ability to work cooperatively with others, resolve conflict, and help others. Also consider customer relations, telephone technique, etc.

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

 

Dependability — Consider the reliability and consistency of the employee’s work. Also, consider the employee’s attendance record.

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

 

Initiative — Consider the exercise of independent judgment and innovation within the employee’s limits of authority and the amount of supervision required.

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

 

Job Knowledge — Consider the extent to which the employee understands and applies his/her knowledge of the techniques, methods, and skills involved in the job.

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

 

PERFORMANCE RATING DEFINITIONS

  1. CLEARLY OUTSTANDING: Clearly exceeds, by a significant degree, most of the major requirements of the job, while maintaining fully satisfactory performance in the remaining duties. Performance results are clearly outstanding. Employee regularly assumes additional responsibilities beyond those which are required. This rating usually including the top 10% of the workforce.

 

  • ABOVE EXPECTATIONS:

 

    Usually exceeds, by a significant degree, some of the major requirements of the job while maintaining fully satisfactory performance in the remaining duties. Employee often assumes additional responsibilities beyond those which are required.

 

  • MEETS EXPECTATIONS:

 

    Consistently meets and occasionally exceeds the requirements of the job. Performance results are satisfactory in all aspects of the job.

 

  • NEEDS IMPROVEMENT:

 

    Usually meets most of the job requirements; but improvement is needed in one or more phases of the job. Results are less than normally expected. When this rating is a warning that the employee’s job is in jeopardy if performance continues at the current level, Human Resources will be involved in preparing an Improvement Plan.

Discuss any other factors which relate to the employee’s work performance, such as significant accomplishments, critical incidents, or necessary improvements:

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

 

Overall Evaluation — Select one overall rating which best describes the employee’s performance throughout the review period considering the ratings and commentary throughout the above document.

Clearly Outstanding
Above Expectations
Meets Expectations
Needs Improvement

 

INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT

 

What are this employee’s strongest skills and abilities?

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

What development action(s) will be needed to maintain or improve current performance? Also, what action(s) will help prepare the employee for future job assignments?

 

Development Objective

 

 

 

 

Action/Anticipated

 

 

 

 

Completion Date

 

 

 

 

Appraised by
Date

Reviewed by
Date

Employee Comments:

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

_____________________________

Employee:
Date

(Employee signature does not necessarily signify agreement with the evaluation, but that the evaluation has been discussed with the supervisor.)

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion.

Posted on April 19, 2000June 29, 2023

Sample performance appraisal for exempt employees

performance measurement, performance appraisal

Performance Appraisal for Exempt Employees

 

 

Name: _______________
Position: _______________
Location: _______________
Supervisor: _______________
Reviewer: _______________
Period Ending: _______________

PERFORMANCE RATINGS:

  1. Exceptional
  2. Above Expectations
  3. Meets Expectations
  4. Needs Improvement
  5. N/A — Not applicable
PERFORMANCE RATING DEFINITION
Exceptional: Consistent performance substantially exceeding normal expectations for total job.
Above Expectations: Frequently exceeds normal performance expectations for key job tasks.
Meets Expectations: Meets normal job requirements in accordance with established standards and may exceed requirements for some job tasks.
Needs Improvement: Overall performance acceptable but improvement needed in one or more significant aspects of job.

 

All evaluations must be supported with specific comments, and all “Overall Evaluations” (see below) of Exceptional and Above Expectations must include specific examples to support the ratings given. When Needs Improvement is the performance rating, attach a written plan to improve performance to this review and enter the Next Review Date in the space provided.

 

PERFORMANCE RESULTS: Achieves expected quality and quantity of output. Places greatest effort on most important aspects of job. Does work on-time, on-budget without sacrificing performance goals or standards.

 

RATING:

 

 

 

COOPERATION/TEAMWORK: Willingly accepts assignments. Able to work on or with teams to cooperatively reach goals.

 

RATING:

 

 

 

INITIATIVE: Self-starter who willingly puts forth effort and time and performs tasks with a minimum of supervision. Begins to solve problems within scope of responsibility as soon as they are apparent. Advises supervisor of current or anticipated problems. Able to apply job knowledge to produce innovations in work process or product.

 

RATING:

 

 

 

ORGANIZING AND PLANNING: Resolves conflicting priorities and schedules with peers and other staff. Performs effectively under pressure and deadlines. Effectively uses time and resources to accomplish work. Will shaft strategy, make decisions, obtain the aid of others to achieve objectives.

 

RATING:

 

 

COMMUNICATION: Verbal and written communications are clear, concise and accurate. Appropriately documents work so others can find work in progress and historical information about the job.

 

RATING:

 

 

 

INTERPERSONAL SKILLS: Interacts productively with others in formal and informal groups both within and outside the company; is receptive to differing ideas and adjusts to the different work styles of others.

 

RATING:

 

 

 

 

For Supervisors, Managers, and/or
Sales Related positions include the following:

SUPERVISION AND LEADERSHIP: Effectively leads and develops staff. Effectively directs staff and provides ongoing feedback. Accurately evaluates performance, matches abilities and job requirements, establishes an effective working relationship, and acts as a positive model for others. Assures a positive working environment in compliance with company standards.

 

RATING:

 

 

 

SALES/MARKETING: Obtains new work (e.g. listings, corporate accounts, etc.) from both existing clients and new clients. Makes marketing suggestions and effectively implements existing marketing programs.

 

RATING:

 

 

 

OTHER (Define and rate another significant performance factor if appropriate)

 

RATING:

 

 

 

PERFORMANCE PLAN FOR NEXT PERIOD (Include expected accomplishments and measurement criteria)

 

 

DEVELOPMENT NEEDS (Areas of knowledge or skill to develop that will improve job performance)

 

 

Plan for how Supervisor will specifically assist employee to maintain or improve performance:

 

 

 

OVERALL EVALUATION:

 

EXCEPTIONAL
ABOVE EXPECTATION
MEETS EXPECTATIONS




NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (Requires written improvement plan of maximum 6 months)

Next Review Date and/or Other Actions:

 

 

SUPERVISOR’S OR EMPLOYEE COMMENTS (If needed, attach additional sheet)

 

 

(Employee’s signature indicates that evaluation has been discussed with the supervisor. It does not necessarily signify agreement).

 

Signatures:

Immediate Supervisor:
Date:

Reviewer’s Manager:
Date:

Employee:
Date:

 

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion.

Posted on April 14, 2000June 29, 2022

Sample Communication Policy

Person on laptop

Following is a sample communication policy in the workplace. The purpose of such a policy should be to facilitate better communication, paving the way for better business. Keep this basic principle in mind as you adjust the policy to coincide with your business’ values.

Also read: How to use technology in your internal communications strategy

Sample Communication Policy 

At Make Your Business Better, Inc., courtesy, tact and consideration should guide each employee in relationships with fellow workers and the public. It is mandatory that each employee in this organization show maximum respect to every other person in the organization and other contacts in a business context. The purpose of communication should be to help others and to make our business run as effectively as possible, thereby gaining the respect of our colleagues and customers.

  • Courtesy, friendliness, and a spirit of helpfulness are important and guide the company’s dealings with employees and customers.
  • Differences of opinion should be handled privately and discreetly. Gossip and backbiting are to be avoided. Communicate directly with the person or persons involved to resolve differences.
  • Conservative criticism — that which will improve business by clarifying or instructing — should be welcomed when delivered with respect and tact. Destructive criticism — that which is designed to harm business or another person — is not to be practiced.
  • Employees should strive to maintain a civil work atmosphere at all times and refrain from shouting, yelling, using vulgarities or swearing at co-workers or customers.
  • The standard of Make Your Business Better, Inc. is a work environment free from disparaging remarks about religion, ethnicity, sexual preferences, appearance and other non-work related matters. Each employee has the responsibility to foster an understanding of others’ differences in order to create an environment where those differences contribute to a better organization.Inappropriate remarks based on any of the following are not tolerated and such behavior will result in immediate termination of employment: race, religion, ethnic origin, physical attributes, mental or physical disability, color, ancestry, marital status, pregnancy, medical condition, citizenship and/or age.Inappropriate remarks include those that treat a group of people in a uniform way, assign a behavior in a disparaging way, imply inferiority of a group, are supposedly funny at someone else’s expense, and/or cause embarrassment or distress to others based on comments about a particular group of people.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion.

Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.

 

Posted on March 17, 2000June 29, 2023

Repatriation Planning Checklist

FMLA

Repatriation presents one of the most complex sets of issues facing international human resources managers today.tax reform impact on relocation

Successful re-entry means that the employee reaps career and personal payoffs for the overseas experience, and that the company enriches its organization through the addition of the international competencies of its repatriated employees. Repatriation difficulties vary by company, by job type and by industry. High attrition rates at re-entry, poor integration of repatriated employees, lack of appropriate positions, downsized organizations and dissatisfied repatriated employees and families are some of the most frequently cited problems.

Although there’s no easy, one-size-fits-all set of answers to the challenges of re-entry, there are guidelines that corporations can follow to positively facilitate the process. The following checklist targets: senior management involvement; expectation management; comprehensive career planning; selection and development processes that ensure that the expatriate acquires new capabilities; upgraded change management systems; and interventions to address the losses that repatriates experience.

Career Issues

Prior to departure
! Involve international human resources at corporate strategic levels when planning for international activities

! Clearly establish the need for the international assignment with input from home and host locations

! Utilize research-based selection processes to make certain that the employee and family are suitable and able to succeed abroad

! Provide cross-cultural and language training to increase effectiveness and adaptation overseas

! Offer career spouse counseling and assistance during assignment

! Outline a clear job description for the expatriate’s position

! Communicate realistic expectations about re-entry to employee at the time the position is offered

! Design career tracking and pathing systems that recognize and reward returning employees

! Establish expat developmental plans that include international competencies

! Link performance appraisals directly to developmental plans with home and host evaluators measuring performance

! Adapt performance appraisals to recognize the cultural demands of the assignment

! Feed performance appraisals into a larger internal human resource communication vehicle

! Appoint home and host mentors who are held accountable to track and support the employee during the assignment, and to identify potential positions at re-entry

! Send job postings to the expatriate while abroad

! Prior to return (one year to six months) arrange a networking visit to home office to establish viability with line and human resources managers

! Repeat networking visit three months prior to return if necessary

! Assist employee with polishing resume writing and interviewing skills

! Circulate resume to all potential hiring units

! Establish fallback position if no job is available

! Arrange for employee to maintain visibility through regular business trips home and through contact with visiting home-country personnel

! Create communication links to employee via E-mail, newsletters, copies of important memos and relevant publications

! Enable family members to stay in touch with changes at home through news publications

! Encourage employee and family to return home for home leave.

At Re-entry
! Arrange an event to welcome and recognize the employee and family, either formally or informally

! Establish support to facilitate family reintegration

! Offer repatriation counseling or workshops to ease adjustment

! Assist spouse with job counseling, resume writing and interviewing techniques

! Provide educational counseling for kids

! Provide employee with a thorough debriefing with a facilitator to identify new knowledge, insights and skills, forums to showcase new competencies, and activities that utilize competencies

! Offer international outplacement to employee and re-entry counseling to entire family if no positions are possible

! Arrange a post-assignment interview with expatriate and spouse to review their view of the assignment and address any repatriation issues.

Financial Planning and Related Activities
! Coordinate with home and host offices prior to repatriation to identify repatriation date

! Run cost projection with anticipated repatriation date to determine the most cost-effective time frame for departure

! Arrange pre-repatriation home country house hunting/school enrollment trip to allow for re-occupying/securing home country housing and registering dependent children for school.

! Arrange for shipment of personal goods.

! Identify dates for temporary living in home and host countries.

! Arrange tax exit interview for employee with tax service provider to determine need for tax clearance/final host country tax return to leave the country.

! Provide tax service provider with year-to-date compensation data for tax clearance/return processing.

! Process any relocation payment.

! Process return incentive payment.

! Process payroll documents to remove employee from expatriate status and review need for actual withholding payments for remainder of year with tax service provider.

! Provide HR generalist in new location with necessary personnel files.

SOURCE: Bennett & Associates and Price Waterhouse LLP

Personnel Journal, January 1995, Vol. 74, No. 1, p. 32.

Posted on August 1, 1999June 29, 2023

Stop Toxic Managers Before They Stop You!

You’ve been there. We’ve all been there. The manager who bullies, threatens, yells. The manager whose mood swings determine the climate of the office on any given workday. Who forces employees to whisper in sympathy in cubicles and hallways. The backbiting, belittling boss from hell. Call it what you want—poor interpersonal skills, unfortunate office practices—but some people, by sheer, shameful force of their personalities, make working for them rotten. We call them toxic managers. Their results may look fine on paper, but the fact is, all is not well if you have one loose in your workforce: it’s unhealthy, unproductive and will eventually undo HR’s efforts to create a healthy, happy and progressive workplace.

Why are some managers toxic—and why should HR care?
The looming question surrounding toxic managers is: Why are there so many? In these days of enlightened management, with so much emphasis on communication, interaction and valuing people, why does this breed still exist?

In large part, it’s because our bottom lines allow it. Companies often don’t have a means of rating managers outside of productivity. If a supervisor is churning out the widgets, the questions are kept to a minimum.

“The biggest single reason is because it’s tolerated,” says Lynne McClure, a Mesa, Arizona-based expert on managing high-risk behaviors and author of Risky Business (Haworth Press, 1996), a book on workplace-violence prevention. She believes if a company has toxic managers, it’s because the culture enables it—knowingly, or unknowingly through plain old apathy (see sidebar, “Eight Toxic-Manager Behaviors—and the Cultures That Nurture Them”).

Certain work situations foster toxic managers. When a company has gone through downsizings, pay freezes or other financial crises, negative management tends to thrive. The emphasis is often on get-tough turnaround, and as such higher-ups often turn a blind eye to crude management as long as the numbers are good. Similarly, employees are less likely to speak up about their rotten bosses—they don’t want to sound like whiners or risk their jobs.

Of course, some people are just going to be miserable to work for no matter what. Yet they end up as managers because they’re good employees whose companies lack another way of rewarding them. “There are some people who simply should not be promoted to management,” says Deb Haggerty, head of Orlando, Florida-based Positive Connections, a consulting firm that teaches employees how to deal with personality differences. “Just because someone is a brilliant engineer doesn’t mean they’ll be a brilliant manager. Yet that’s too often how a company demonstrates status.”

Some people are miserable to work for no matter what. Yet they end up as managers because they’re good employees whose companies lack another way of rewarding them.

So a person is difficult to work for—is that really an HR concern? Of course it is, and for several reasons. At the very least, there’s the morale issue. Bad managers tend to infect their departments with bad attitudes. It’s like a disease: They spread despair, anger and depression, which show up in lackluster work, absenteeism and turnover. Workplace guru Tom Bay has written an entire book about how ideas and moods can aid or sabotage the workplace, Change Your Attitude: Creating Success One Thought at a Time (Career Press, 1998). He believes it’s toxic managers—and the cultures that enable them—that are at the core of today’s job-hopping phenomenon. “Turnover is the highest it’s ever been,” he says. “Employees don’t feel appreciated.”

Obviously, turnover, absenteeism and uninspired work cost a company money, even if a department’s output remains level. But there are other dangers of toxic management. Intense bullying over a period of time can cause emotional damage to employees. Says Haggerty: “In addition to being problems in themselves, toxic behaviors create a hostile work environment and can easily escalate to real violence, harassment and intimidation—all of which end up landing a company in court.” And you can imagine how sympathetic a jury would be toward a company that allowed its employees to be terrorized in order to keep a tidy bottom line.

So how does HR address the situation? Help those that can be helped, and excise those who can’t—or won’t. But first comes what’s often the tricky part: finding them.

Every company has them: Identify the bad apples.
Toxic managers don’t always stand atop your building, wearing a black hat and holding a placard telling you they’re the bad guys. HR has to do a little detective work, particularly when employees are often loathe to complain about personality differences, no matter how justified. Certainly, there are some warning signs. Check for instance, turnover in every manager’s department—are employees transferring or quitting a particular area? If so, that’s cause to ask further questions.

“Being communicative and being observant is vital,” says Bay, also a former HR director. “Don’t wait for massive turnover, that’s like realizing you’ve had a heart attack after you’ve died.” At the first increased trickle of turnover or transfers, Bay says, start asking employees what’s happening.

Have discussions both individually for those who need privacy to speak their minds, and in groups to appeal to employees who like peer support. Listen for key words or notions; don’t expect employees to explicitly say they hate their boss. Do ask follow-up questions. For instance, one common flag is for an employee to say their job is fine, but that they’re under a lot of strain or pressure. Ask them why—it’s often an interpersonal problem, and a good way for you to get more information.

At Wescast Industries Inc. in Brantford, Ontario, Wayne Phibbs, vice president of HR, uses a monthly “report card” meeting for employees, designed to measure their job satisfaction. “Picture a union person frustrated with his boss—he’s not listening, he’s not helping,” says Phibbs. “Every month there’s this opportunity to force your leader to be honest. He can’t go in there and buffalo people; it won’t work.” Phibbs thinks such open talks and constant forums contribute to his workforce’s high satisfaction level—even among the Canadian Auto Workers Union, a group notorious for its scrappy members.

Of course, not all employees are going to be publicly forthcoming. So keep the lines of communication open in as many venues as possible. “Exit interviews are helpful, but they’re too late,” says McClure. “I wouldn’t stop doing them, but you need to do other things.”

One common flag is for an employee to say their job is fine, but that they’re under a lot of strain or pressure. Ask them why—it’s often an interpersonal problem.

Anonymous hotlines are helpful, and can be set up as cheaply as dedicating one phone line with voice-mail, or more elaborately, through an outside agency that refers issues to HR or an EAP, depending on which is appropriate. “HR has to be careful not to get into counseling issues, and that’s hard because we know how fuzzy that line is,” admits McClure. HR can also encourage employees to send e-mail. Employees need not use their work account; many Internet sites offer free e-mail with anonymous user names– hotmail.com, for instance).

Using multi-source performance reviews, in which employees can give feedback on their bosses anonymously, is also enormously helpful. At Spring Engineering Corp. in Livonia, Michigan, Tim Tindall, president in charge of HR issues, instituted a 360-degree survey based around “servant leadership,” the theory that the best managers are those who serve their employees. In that mode, the questionnaire covered qualities like listening, empathy, awareness and healing. “The culture in this area [of Michigan] is somewhat adversarial between labor and management. It’s a long tradition, and one that’s hard to break, so this helped us get at some issues.” Tindall included himself in the reviews, which were discussed openly, and used to plot next steps.

One word of warning about multi-source reviews: These don’t need to wait for a manager’s yearly review, but they do need to be given to all managers in a department. It’s key, says Haggerty, not to target one particular supervisor, even if turnover and comments have identified that person as problematic.

Finally, talk to your supervisors, says Bay. When you ask a manager how things are going in his or her department, and you hear a lot of “I” rather than “we,” or a lot of blame being dispensed, that can be a flag. So can constant griping about employees in general. Finally, keep your ear to the ground, even if a manager doesn’t strike you as toxic. Says Sharon Keys Seal, a Baltimore job coach: “They’re not going to treat you the way they treat their workers.”

Put your managers into detox.
So now you know who—and what—you’re dealing with. What do you do next? First comes the confrontation: Sit down with this person, and tell him or her about the problem. Be as specific as you can. Don’t couch it in vague terms, like saying the manager has “interpersonal issues.” If the manager is perceived as a bully, say that. If she tends to explode at employees, tell her that. Then explain it must be stopped, and why. Don’t come down too hard: This may be the person’s first whiff of a problem. However, do be firm, and tell the manager that future performance will be noted.

Also set a time period for improvement. “Addressing this during a goal-setting session might be good,” advises Haggerty. “It really has to be done in a positive fashion, because those kinds of individuals tend to take criticism and harbor it and nurture it.”

After the intervention comes training. In many cases, the manager simply doesn’t have the correct tools, particularly if the person’s background is field-specific rather than managerial. “You have to give them alternatives for their behavior,” says McClure. “Say not only ‘You can’t do this,’ but ‘You have to do this.’” If that means they need to go to seminars on employee relations, that’s what they need to do. If the person is a poor manager simply because he’s in over his head, give him some educational opportunities. Collaborate with the supervisor—ask her what she thinks is the problem and what might help. There are seminars and classes for everything from anger management to accounting. Also offer EAP counseling—sometimes a person’s main issues are emotional, alcohol or drug-related, and a good therapist can help.

If, after the intervention and follow-up period, the behavior hasn’t changed, HR must decide what to do. If the person has skills useful to the company and is a good worker, you may consider transferring him out of a managerial position but keeping him at the company. Some people just don’t work well with others, but may blossom when working in a more narrow sphere of interaction.

If that’s not the case—if you actually need to terminate the manager—this can be done, carefully. It’s iffy grounds to fire someone strictly for personality issues. You need to define those issues as work-related performance problems, says Harold M. Brody, chair of the Los Angeles labor and employment practice of Proskauer Rose LLP. That means you don’t just say a person is a bully, but that the person’s bullying management techniques thwart productivity in the department. Once it’s defined in this manner, you can discharge the person the way you would for any other performance problem. Keep a record of the incidents, document that you’ve given the employee time for change, and make the termination. This is actually one case in which, if it should reach a jury, the employer has an advantage. “You get this rare opportunity, if you have the right record, to show you had the guts to go to a manager who’s producing the widgets but driving everyone crazy, and saying, ‘You can’t do that, and if you do, you’re going to lose your job,’” says Brody.

Prevent future problems.
Once you’ve addressed your current toxic managers, you have to make sure more don’t sprout up. To begin with, make sure job descriptions include treating employees in a dignified and appropriate manner. Include behaviors that won’t be tolerated, and hold them accountable for turnover. This not only makes the company’s stance very clear, but it emphasizes the importance of treating people well. “Behavior has to become part of the job description,” says McClure. “That way you can no longer say that manager X is a great manager because they really produce, but they’re terrible with how they treat their people. That way, manager X can no longer by definition be called a great manager.”

Build in pay increases or title changes to reward good work without forcing people to assume positions they’re not suited for or wouldn’t enjoy.

Once the job description includes behavior, HR can effectively reward or discipline managers through performance reviews. “Tell them they’re going to be evaluated, compensated and possibly disciplined based on their ability to effectively meet HR objectives—relating to employees and managing them in positive ways,” says Brody. Although Phibbs of Wescast says he uses performance ratings more as a discussion tool than as a punitive pay measurement, if a manager gets poor reviews and doesn’t improve, he’d take the next step. “If someone kept messing up, we wouldn’t give them an increase.” Adds McClure: “Make it a pocketbook issue; that gets their attention.”

Finally, make sure management isn’t the only way up to advance in your company. Build in pay increases or title changes to reward good work without forcing people to assume positions they’re not suited for and won’t enjoy.

You’ve been there. We’ve all been there. But if you’re in HR, you have the power to help toxic managers, their employees — and ultimately, your company.

Workforce, August 1999, Vol. 78, No. 8, pp. 44-46.

 

Posted on February 18, 1999January 15, 2019

Help Employees ‘Depart With Dignity’ After a Termination

employee communication co-worker

Yvonne Mug, manager of human resources at diagnostic X-ray manufacturer Summit Industries, hasn’t seen a termination suit in 25 years in HR. That’s because she believes in “departure with dignity.” It’s so important to her that if the president of her 100-employee Chicago company didn’t support that, she says, “I’d find another job in a heartbeat.” Here is the termination checklist she developed.

Spell out the reason for the termination.
She hands the employee a paper that reads: ‘resigned’ and ‘dismissed.’ She circles dismissed and writes the reason for the termination.

Encourage employee to talk.
She helps them vent feelings, verbalize the reason for the termination, and take responsibility for it. “I try to imagine the employee’s family is there” and the talk is helping the worker explain what happened to them, so “they can look at the business at hand and move forward.”

Thoroughly review benefits, COBRA, etc.
After getting employee’s signature on paperwork, she gives them copies of everything.

Emphasize the positive.
“I keep the mood comfortable and light,” she says. “I can’t change what happened, [but] I can take as long as it takes to make this person feel OK.”

Answer all questions.
“I try to get rid of some fears, including unexpressed ones like, ‘What will you say in a reference?'”

Write reference letter.
“Everyone has some strengths. Were they extremely punctual? Did they have perfect attendance?” Mug and the employee agree on the letter, so the employee has no future surprises.

Part as friends.
“I don’t expect anyone to be happy, but they can be at peace, with the sense that I respect them. I treat a terminated employee the same way I treat one of my existing employees.” The result? Business as usual—which is invaluable. “Remember, when you let someone go, they have buddies at the company who will be talking and watching your actions. You don’t want the terminated employee to give us a bad rap.”

Source: Yvonne Mug, manager of human resources at diagnostic X-ray manufacturer Summit Industries. Reprinted with permission from Human Resource Management News, 1998. All Rights Reserved. Kennedy Information, LLC/Human Resource Management News.

Posted on November 1, 1998February 17, 2019

Six Types of Employee Attitudes

Shell Oil Co. hired a top survey research firm to study 1,123 Americans this summer on their attitudes about work. The results showed that people generally fit into one of six categories:

 

Fulfillment Seekers
Do you want to make the world a better place? You’re probably a Fulfillment Seeker. A large majority of Fulfillment Seekers believe a good job is one that “allows me to use my talents and make a difference,” rather than one that provides a good income and benefits. Most say they have a career as opposed to a job, and a substantial majority say they are team players rather than leaders.

Fulfillment Seekers are mostly white, married and satisfied with their jobs. You’ll find these teachers, nurses and public defenders in a variety of “rooms”: classrooms, emergency rooms and courtrooms.

 

High Achievers
To pass muster as a High Achiever, plan on laying out a career path; a large majority of achievers say they have followed a career plan since a young age.

Their planning apparently pays off—The High Achievers group is the highest income group, with nearly a quarter earning more than $75,000, and the group with the highest educational achievement. Most are leaders who take initiative, and a majority hold managerial positions and are male. Look for these lawyers, surgeons and architects in operating rooms and law offices.

 

Clock Punchers
Put on a happy face? Forget about it. Clock Punchers are the least satisfied of any group surveyed, with nearly all of them saying they have a job rather than a career. An overwhelming majority say they ended up in their jobs largely by chance, and nearly three-quarters say they would make different career choices if they could do it all over again. Clock Punchers are predominately female, have the lowest household income (35 percent below $30,000) and are the least educated—half have a high school diploma or less, and fewer than 1 in 5 has earned a four-year college degree. These cashiers, waitresses and hospital orderlies aren’t happy campers.

The High Achievers group is the highest income group, with nearly a quarter earning more than $75,000, and the group with the highest educational achievement.

 

Risk Takers
Risk Takers have something in common with bank robbers: They both go where the money is. Members of this group are far more willing than others to take risks for the opportunity for great financial success.

They are also the only group that likes to move from employer to employer in search of the best job. This group is young (45 percent are under the age of 35) and largely male. Risk Takers are fairly well-educated and have good incomes (more than 4 in 10 have household incomes above $50,000). Show them the dough: These are software entrepreneurs and car salespeople.

 

Ladder Climbers
Ladder Climbers aren’t going anywhere—except up. These are “company people” who prefer the stability of staying with one employer for a long time.

A substantial majority prefer a stable income over the chance of great financial success and consider themselves to be leaders rather than team players. Company loyalty matters—4 in 9 say they would change cities to stay with their current employer. They are the opposite of Fullfillment Seekers.

 

Paycheck Cashers
Planning on a career as a Paycheck Casher? Enjoy the cubicle. Most Paycheck Cashers prefer jobs that provide good income and benefits over ones that allow them to use their talents and make a difference.

Members of the Paycheck Cashers group are young (46 percent are under 35), male and confused: Although a majority say they will take risks for a chance at achieving great financial success, an even larger number want the security of staying with one employer for a long time.

Most work in blue-collar or non-professional white-collar jobs, do not have a college degree, and prefer working in a large company or agency. This group also has the largest representation of minorities: 18 percent African-American, 10 percent Hispanic and 3 percent Asian.

Workforce Extra, November 1998, p. 10.

 

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress