Skip to content

Workforce

Tag: financial wellness

Posted on August 27, 2020June 29, 2023

Management tips on overtime equalization and tracking hours

scheduling; time and attendance; forecasting

Many schedules like 24-7 operations have built in overtime, just to make sure there’s coverage, but in any organization there’s potential that employees may accrue unplanned overtime. For managers trying to run a tight ship, this can complicate a precisely planned schedule and budget. 

Sometimes there’s too much work and not enough resources or employees to accomplish these tasks, leading companies to give too much overtime. “That’s a matter for management and leadership to assess and to determine whether they need to hire additional talent,” said Chuck Buiocchi, senior director of BPS operations at Kelly Services.

It’s vital that managers get payroll correct, and while many companies still use old school paper time cards, third party platforms can help a lot, he added. 

Several workplace experts shared management tips for organizations trying to manage overtime more accurately and precisely. Here is their advice. 

Overtime equalization can help you decide who gets extra hours

Some employees may want more overtime hours to help ensure financial stability, Buiocchi said. Managers want to be fair to employees in situations like this, and if there’s more demand for overtime than supply, they’ll want to create a method of allocating those hours fairly. 

Overtime equalization — the attempt to balance overtime among employees — can be dependent on factors like employee tenure and reliability. But more often than not, organizations have to consider the people with the most relevant skill sets first, Buiocchi said. 

Sometimes overtime is built into schedules and interested employees can ask for those hours, but in general managers want to avoid unnecessary overtime as much as possible. 

Also read: A technology integration is an intervention to dissolve common payroll errors

The key here is understanding the root cause of this increased need for labor, Buiocchi said. If employees are spread too thin, maybe it’s time to hire more employees. If the reason for more overtime is a decrease in productivity, drill down on what’s impacting productivity and address it. This is a much bigger project and requires deeper discussion, but it’s necessary if something is impacting the team to such a degree, he added. 

Allocating overtime hours during the pandemic 

The COVID-19 pandemic has complicated overtime allocation to some degree. Now when determining overtime equalization, organizations may deal with a world of juxtaposition, said Traci Fiatte, chief executive officer, professional and commercial staffing at Randstad US. Some employees are dying for extra hours and income for a variety of reasons, like those working 60 or 70 hour weeks at two different jobs because their spouse lost their job. But others don’t want to go to work at all or are scared. 

Meanwhile, employers are desperately trying to manage overtime and not pay it, because many organizations’ revenues have declined since the pandemic began. 

Smart scheduling is especially important during the COVID-19 pandemic, when offices or places of operations might have to stagger out their shifts so that employees can be socially distanced, Fiatte said. Or maybe they need to operate at a lower capacity than usual so that employees can more easily stay away from each other. She also suggested adopting scheduling tools that allow managers to take floor plans into account as they create schedules and socially distant staff appropriately. 

“Overtime is best managed when you know who is working when and where, even in terms of floor planning —  which is a concept we never had to worry about pre-COVID. We certainly had to worry about shift scheduling before, but we never had to worry about who was where,” she said. 

scheduling, labor tracking

Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, companies are eager to produce as much as they usually have or more, but whether or not they’ll have the same employee headcount as before is uncertain, she said. And with fewer employees, maintaining that production schedule can be tricky.

One strategy organizations have adopted to address pandemic challenges is relying on more shifts with fewer employees, she said. During times like this, that may be more effective than longer shifts with more people on the floor at the same time. 

Actions speak louder than words

One of the main problems with labor tracking and monitoring is that it’s difficult to accurately track or monitor overtime, said Albert Rizzo, adjunct assistant professor at the NYU School of Professional Studies within its human capital management program. HR needs to do it and not just pretend to do it, he said. 

Also read: Shift scheduling strategies can be improved through technology

Also, he added, HR needs to make sure the overtime policy is not just a few lines in the employee handbook but something that’s actionable. Best practices here depend on the size of the company. 

For a mid-sized company with many employees, for example, one common mistake is that HR is given the responsibility to track labor, Rizzo said. But it’s actually be more efficient and accurate if lower level managers were given the task of tracking this.

“Rather than put the burden on one department like HR or one HR manager to track, the best practice would be to get the person closest to the employees typically incurring the overtime and have that person manage it,” he said. 

While many managers view overtime as a problem, they should be looking at it more from the solution mindset, he added. When team members are accruing too much unplanned overtime, there’s a solution to be discovered. Managers can speak to the people accruing the extra hours and find out why that’s occurring. Maybe there’s no clear policy on what constitutes overtime and what doesn’t. Maybe the location is short staffed.

Ensure that your employees are properly classified

HR needs to make sure they’ve properly classified employees to begin with so that exempt employees are truly exempt and nonexempt employees are truly nonexempt. Misclassification frequently happens in HR, Rizzo said. 

Regarding overtime, perhaps an analysis could be done on what exact duties employees are performing. Managers can potentially shift certain duties from A nonexempt employee to an exempt employee who won’t be paid overtime for working extra hours.

“HR should be very careful about classification of exempt and nonexempt employees,” he said.

Cover your tracks with labor tracking 

An important part of this conversation is what the burden of proof is on overtime claims and who holds that burden, Rizzo said. If an employee claims they have worked unpaid overtime, employers must have the information on file to disprove that claim. If the employer doesn’t have any records that accurately track if the claim is true or not, the U.S. Department of Labor will pursue assuming the employee is telling the truth.

Also read: Labor analytics: A how-to guide for company leadership

“If an employee says 60 hours and the employer has no way to refute the claim or doesn’t refute it sufficiently, then the employee’s statement of how many hours they worked will be taken as the truth,” Rizzo said, adding that this is something employer often take for granted or don’t know.

“There has to be a real tracking system, Rizzo said. “It doesn’t have to be sophisticated but it does have to be monitored carefully.”

Posted on February 5, 2020June 29, 2023

Pay equity doesn’t mean paying the same for everyone

pay gap

In 2018, 40 states put through legislation on pay equity practices.

compensation pay equity

There is no shortage of laws that give all people the right to be free from discrimination in compensation, including the Equal Pay Act of 1963, Title VIl of the Civil Rights Act of 1965, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and Title I of the ADA Act of 1990. 

Pay equity is a critical issue for our time. It’s proven to drive profits for companies that support it. So why is it taking legislation to get companies to move towards a more fair and equitable pay system?

Perhaps it’s the misperception that pay equity means treating everyone the same way. But equal doesn’t mean fair. The goal of pay equity is not to treat everyone the same — it’s actually just the opposite. You can treat people fairly and still treat them differently. Factors such as educational background, tenure, skill, quality of work, etc., are all variables that can, and should, be factored into the mix. But, biases based on personal attributes, such as race, gender, age, disability, sexual orientation and more, are variables that should not affect pay.

Pay equity is equal pay for work of equal value. It is also used to describe pay comparisons where there is no unexplained difference pay, and that is not the result of defensible and legitimate factors. Therefore, pay inequity is any difference in pay that is unexplained, or not the result of defensible and legitimate factors.

According to the World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Report for 2018, which benchmarks 149 countries on their progress toward gender parity, the US ranked No. 51 in the world. We can do better. By comparison, Iceland, Norway and Sweden occupy the top three spots. And, although many countries have achieved important milestones toward gender parity, much still needs to be done.

Pay equity includes total compensation — including overtime pay, bonuses, stock grants, profit sharing and bonus plans, and yes, life insurance, PTO and holiday pay, travel allowances, reimbursement for travel expenses. However, we need to remember all the processes that result in a worker paycheck, including promotions, performance reviews, merit raises, access to the CEO and representation on the leadership team since they all can impact pay differences over time. 

And, while individual organizations have their own formulas for fair and equitable compensation, everyone will benefit by evaluating pay equity in the broader ecosystem. Solving pay equity comes from organizations and their leaders who take ownership of culture, pay programs and total rewards.

The first step is for organizations to be willing to take a look at their own data and processes.  And then be willing to acknowledge it if there are issues around pay equity and work to solve for it. Some may desire to make their process and findings public inside their companies, and then share the plan to monitor it regularly to ensure continued pay equity.   

 Here are three things to get started: 

  1. Analyze average pay of people within an organization to find patterns. Start by role-to-role comparisons, then group to group, the protected classes.
  2. Evaluate the hiring processes to ascertain diversity of teams and the ways in which your process results in a wide range of candidates.
  3. Evaluate the processes which reward, promote, and give feedback to your workforce.  Are they equitable or did the majority of raises go to one gender, racial, or age group?

 To solve for pay equity issues we must look closely at representation. We need more women, people of color, and the LGBTQ community in leadership positions such as on corporate boards. According to Heidrick & Struggles, men hold 93 percent of the CEO positions in U.S. companies. Further research from ISS Analytics found that the percentage of female directors is just 24 percent in the United States.

Total rewards programs include anything that signals to the employee that they are important. The most effective total rewards programs are enacted through the lens of inclusion and take into consideration representation from under represented groups.

It’s also critical to be transparent as to how rewards are given out and how employees can navigate the system. Today, most employees do not have any idea how their pay packages are put together. An organization’s goal is transparency so that people understand how to navigate the culture and achieve their potential at work, which affords them the chance to have a great life.

For example, ACIPCO, an international provider of clean energy technology and services, provides quarterly profit sharing, an on-site health care facility and rewards workers for good tips/suggestions. They also give access to the company plane and yacht when employees need it — and this is not based on hierarchy, everyone gets access. It’s no wonder that they consistently land on Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to Work For and, in an industry where turnover is 80- to 100 percent, they have less than .05 percent a year.

Starbucks offers free Spotify premium and free online classes at Arizona State University and, of course, free coffee. Netflix offers one-year parental leave and Salesforce.com provides commuter benefits, educational reimbursement, refinancing of student debt and 24-hour travel assistance.

Because of the impact on culture, customers, and on the regulatory environment, it’s vitally important that attention to this comes from the C-suite, not just from HR. The critical role for HR is to observe, rebuild systems, make sure the data is accurate and challenge the C-suite and the existing ways of doing things to be the champion of the people experience. 

Here are the takeaways: 

  1. Don’t shy away from the issue of pay equity. Embrace its importance and build processes around the issue rather than waiting for federal or state laws to dictate what you need to do.
  2. Analyze and understand current plans that are in place. If a woman or minority is disadvantaged from the start of employment, that’s a problem that will grow exponentially.
  3. Consistently look at and monitor the process, review it and test it.
  4. Assess gaps from these measurements and make changes accordingly.
  5. Institute transparency between employees and leadership so that you’re setting the narrative and telling your own story rather than allowing social sharing to drive it and derail it.

 In short, paying people fairly is a great idea for many reasons and a great business practice. Don’t be afraid to look at your own pay equity issues. It’s better to be in the know. 

The result is a boost in reputation, the ability to recruit the best talent and to provide employees the ability to maximize their contributions to the organization.

Posted on September 26, 2019June 29, 2023

Experts: 70 Is the Golden Age to Max Out SS Benefits

health care costs

Becky Beach admits she doesn’t know much about Social Security, but she definitely thinks it won’t be around when she needs it. That’s why the 40-year-old lifestyle blogger plans to start taking the benefit when she turns 62.

“I plan to take it out as early as I can,” Beach said from her home in Arlington, Texas. “I don’t really know that much about Social Security, but I hear it’s going to go away.”

Lots of people like Beach think similarly. In fact, only 4 percent of retirees wait until the optimal age of 70 to take their Social Security benefit, a new study by robo-​adviser United Income said. Retirees lose out on $3.4 trillion in possible income, which on average is $111,000 per household, because they don’t take Social Security at the best point in their lifetime.

Also read: Health and Retirement Benefits Under One Umbrella

“Most people don’t claim Social Security at the optimal age from a financial perspective because they may not be having the necessary retirement planning discussions,” said Jason Fichtner, former chief economist at the Social Security Administration, and co-author of the study. “Financial advisers, employer HR departments and policymakers could do a better job with educational materials and encouraging people to spend more time sorting through this important decision.”

Social Security provides more than $1 trillion in benefits to 64 million Americans.

Nearly all (92 percent) of retirees that took Social Security at the wrong time would have seen their income increase had they pinpointed the right time. In fact, more than half of these retirees could have increased their income by more than 25 percent in their 70s and 80s, the report said. That’s usually when people see spikes in health care costs.

Today, Social Security provides more than $1 trillion in benefits to 64 million Americans. It represents a third of retirement income for seniors, which averages $1,461 each month.

There is no doubt the system is being stressed with increased life expectancies, but the doomsday scenario of the system going broke isn’t exactly right, Fichtner said. The latest Social Security Administration report shows that the trust fund reserves are expected to be used up (if nothing is done) by 2035. If Congress chooses to do nothing to fund Social Security, it will still be able to pay out 80 percent of what working Americans are owed after 2035.

“The trust fund may become depleted, but once depleted, it will pay out what it collects,” Fichtner said. “By law, Social Security will pay out 80 percent of what is promised.”

The study showed that most people should wait until 70 to claim their Social Security benefit. While workers can start claiming their benefit at 62, the amount increases on average about 8 percent each year they delay the claim. The Social Security Administration reported a 62-year-old would receive a $725 monthly benefit if they claimed today. Choosing to delay the benefit until age 70 would increase the amount to $1,280, a 177 percent increase.

Also read: Live to 100? Implications for Work, Employers and Retirement

While waiting to get a bigger paycheck sounds great, it may not always be feasible, said Colleen Jaconetti, senior investment analyst at The Vanguard Group. It’s not wise to completely deplete an investment portfolio to accomplish this, she said. In addition, some people may not be able to work or earn enough money in their later years to get them to 70.

“A lot of people don’t realize that they need to figure out how they fill that gap” between 62 and 70, Jaconetti said. “It’s a complicated problem.”

Jaconetti pointed out that those who are able to bridge the gap and delay claiming Social Security can also see other benefits from their decision. Some may see a lower tax bill while in retirement because Social Security taxes may only come from 85 percent to 50 percent of that income. In addition, relying more on Social Security in later years may allow heirs to inherit unused assets from retirement accounts. The important thing, she said, is that people make informed decisions on their health, financial status and other factors to determine the right time to claim the benefit.

Fichtner and Jaconetti agreed that most people are like Beach, they really don’t think about Social Security and may only have time to hear or see the headlines. It would be helpful for human resources leaders and policymakers to help people understand the options well before it becomes their time to make this often permanent decision to claim Social Security benefits. The study looked at Social Security messaging and suggested that the Social Security Administration revisit how it describes claiming age. Currently, age 62 is labeled “early eligibility age.” Fichtner suggested age 62 could simply be labeled “minimum benefit age” while age 70 could be labeled the “maximum benefit age.”

“How we talk about this can change behavior,” Fichtner said. “The little things can make a difference.”

Posted on May 3, 2019June 29, 2023

Thanks for the Financial Advice, But …

Andie Burjek, Working Well blog

There was a lot of upheaval on Twitter earlier this week for JPMorgan, which tweeted something many people found frustrating.

The bank has since deleted the tweet, but here’s the text that went along with it:

You: why is my balance so low
Bank account: make coffee at home
Bank account: eat food that’s already in the fridge
Bank account: you don’t need a cab, it’s only three blocks
You: I guess we’ll never know
Bank account: seriously?
#MondayMotivation

“JPMorgan’s tweet demonstrated a stunning tone-deafness about the economic realities facing ordinary Americans — including the big bank’s own minimum wage employees,” according to the LA Times. The article went on to quote a personal finance expert who says the genre of personal finance has long been discredited.

I’m reminded of an op-ed I read on Vice last year. The frustrated author wrote: “Sometime last year, I started frequently googling ‘why am I poor’ and ‘how do I stop being poor.’ Every result insisted the problem is I go out too much (I don’t go out, I’m too tired), I don’t have a savings account (I don’t have enough kick around cash to open a savings account), or I’m not planning my money right (I plan to pay my rent and then cry in a corner until my next paycheck, does that count?) … Financial advice is geared toward the financially stable who make bad financial choices, like investing in bitcoin this year or getting bangs after a breakup.”

I believe there is a lesson here for companies that already have or are considering financial wellness programs. Mostly, if you’re not paying your employees enough (like many minimum-wage employees or some entry-level employees), financial advice could come across as pretty much nonsense. See the Vice article above.

I would agree with that. I’m reminded of a great Twitter thread I saw a few weeks ago.

employer: “you’re hired, salary is $36k”

me: ”I was hoping for $50k”

“we have coffee on tap and a casual dress code”

“that’s great bu-“

“FOOSBALL TABLES AND TREADMILL DESKS”

“please calm do-“

“DOGS AT WORK, HAPPY HOURS, FREE FUCKING SNACKS, MILLENNIALS LOVE THIS SHIT”

— blake (@NYCofficeworker) February 22, 2019

Responses included, “Ah that’s great because my landlord just started accepting snacks for rent payments.” Also, “What’s amazing is employers pitch these things as benefits, and not like, I dunno, good health coverage or a retirement plan.” Also, “my starting salary at entry level was $36k… 15 YEARS AGO.”

And, my favorite:

employer: “you’re hired, salary is 36k”

me: “I was hoping for 50k”

“14 Genius Money-Saving Tips that Will Help You Afford Your Bills…maybe”

— Kipp (@Kipptacular) February 24, 2019

It’s a good reminder that things organizations call “perks” won’t appeal to people who aren’t making enough money. Trying to push “financial advice” as a perk to someone who’s living paycheck-to-paycheck or someone who’s seeing everyday expenses continuously rise while their salary stays pretty much the same, for example, will realistically solicit a much more bitter reaction than you’d hope for.

I’m not saying financial wellness programs and free financial advice have zero value, but they’re a tiny piece in the puzzle. They address a symptom (money problems), not the cause. People have bills, debt, student loans and medical bills to pay, and salaries have not been rising at the same rate as everything else. People’s money problems exist in this broader environment where everything (including education) costs more, and fair compensation is more useful for employees than free advice.

As someone relatively early in her career (who hopefully will be making much more money as I grow older), I do want to acknowledge that money advice can be helpful. My parents and other family members have given me helpful, necessary guidance over the years, and I’m very thankful for that. However, even I understand that personal spending habits are just one aspect of how you’re doing financially.

There are also these macro factors that cannot be ignored.

Also in Working Well: Expanding Employee Access to Mental Health Care

Posted on December 10, 2018June 29, 2023

Help Workers Save for Rainy Days, Not Just Golden Years

employee rainy day savings

There is a savings crisis in America. Eight out of 10 workers are living paycheck to paycheck, and though many employers have started to prioritize financial wellness in recent years, they are doing little to prepare employees for financial emergencies that could end up affecting their performance in the workplace.employee rainy day savings

While it’s true that a lot of companies offer 401(k)s to help employees save for retirement, they aren’t a feasible option for many U.S. workers, regardless of employer contributions. The Federal Reserve Board’s 2018 “Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households” shows that 40 percent of people can’t even afford a $400 emergency, much less afford to set money aside for retirement.

401(k)s have their place in financial wellness, but that place is not savings for events prior to retirement. There are substantial fees associated with withdrawing funds before retirement.

These fees impact a lot of people: 44 percent of Americans report having to tap into their retirement before they hit age 59 and a half for things like grad school, debt reduction and unexpected hospital visits.

There is a 10 percent penalty for early withdrawals. On top of that, employees must also pay income tax on the money they withdraw, making these accounts even less useful for unexpected expenses prior to retirement.

Financial Worry Hurts the Bottom Line

But early withdrawal fees are just one symptom of the larger problem of ongoing financial stress. Last year, nearly 60 percent of people surveyed said they were anxious about their future financial state. And even more concerning, more than 30 percent reported being worried about how they’ll make ends meet in the present.

Also read: What Ails Financial Wellness Plans

This financial stress leads to big problems in the workplace. For example in 2017, financial worry caused employees to miss an average of 3.4 work days, and nearly a third of financially stressed employees say their money concerns carry over into their job, affecting their productivity and focus.

SafetyNet asked thousands of workers what they would like from their companies, and most noted they wanted help saving money, especially for unexpected emergencies. But few employers are offering help when it comes to rainy day savings.

Also read: Assessing the Value of Financial Wellness for Your Employees

Employers Can Help by Offering Short-term Savings Programs

The good news is that improving employees’ financial security is solvable.

Some companies, like Aetna, have started using incentive-based financial programs to educate employees on basic money management. Still, only 17 percent of large companies offer these types of programs and employees want financial tools in addition to education.

Prudential Financial is throwing their hat in the ring by helping employees set up an after-tax savings option within their 401(k)s. This model enables employees to gather after-tax contributions from their paycheck and have a lower withdrawal fee than the pre-tax contributions do, making these funds easier to use as emergency savings if needed.

One option becoming popular for employers is a short-term savings program, which holds funds that people can access at any time.

Different from traditional savings accounts, these programs (sometimes called “rainy day funds”) are typically sponsored by employers. They work by stowing funds in dedicated savings accounts. A few varieties already exist.

CookieJar, for example, is an employer-sponsored savings account that rounds up spare change from employees’ debit card purchases and gives companies the option to match those contributions. This type of program is low-cost — far below those of a 401(k) for the employer, and free to the employee.

And with Congress attempting to make it easier for employers to set up these types of programs, you can expect to see more in the future.

Given the amount of time and energy currently lost to financial stress, these programs could have a major impact on the well-being — and the bottom line — of your company.

Posted on September 12, 2016June 29, 2023

Developing an Effective Financial Wellness Strategy

Andie Burjek, Working Well blog

Financial wellness is a trendy phrase nowadays in the wellness space. People don’t want to worry about money, and companies want employees not to worry about their finances, either. It makes sense that employees will be more productive at work, and employers can get the most out of their workers if they’re not fretting about their finances. But let’s take a step back for a moment and consider what financial wellness even means.

The whole definition has changed within the past 10 years, said Dorothy Miraglia-King, strategic benefits consulting expert and executive vice president at Engage PEO, a company that provides HR solutions for small and mid-sized businesses. Ten years ago, financial wellness meant retirement savings. But the idea of what retirement looks like has changed dramatically in the past decade. It’s not as realistic for people to retire at 65 anymore, for example. People are living and working longer. What about all the life that happens before retirement that requires financial health?

Another dramatic change? The multigenerational workforce: baby boomers, millennials, Gen X and Gen Y, all working together.

I recently wrote about how, at the basic level, employees in every generation want the same thing. They’re interested in the same benefits and life-long financial goals. However, they’re at different steps in obtaining those goals. Their immediate financial needs are dependent on where they are in life. Based on these more short-term differences, I spoke with Miraglia-King about how a company can develop a successful financial wellness program.

The first step, she said, is to create a measurable objective. For example, “I want employees to understand their 401(k)s better.”

Financial health objectives may be dependent on the employee demographic. One company’s workforce is not the same as the other. A millennial who needs to learn how to manage credit card debt or how to acquire a mortgage or how to put together a financial plan has a different objective than someone in their 50’s who’s figuring out if they can retire in 10 years.

The employer has to ask, “What do my employees look like?” when defining financial health.

In general, millennials may be interested in things like paying off student debt and managing basic living expenses. Also: balancing a checking account. This is one example of a financial skill that certain generations never learned because of how quickly technology took over everything.

“You’d be surprised at how little people know about balancing a checking account,” Miraglia-King said. “We don’t use paper anymore, so balancing a checkbook is a skill that’s gone away. A financial wellness objective could be learning how to manage money online.”

Once the employer has developed the need (the objective), Miraglia-King said, they should develop the communications strategy that identifies the audience and looks at method of delivery. How do employees prefer to get their information? Something electronic or written? In an email campaign or through access to an adviser? Maybe a weekend workshop?

Employers should also consider how will they measure what’s occurring and what changes happen as a result of the initiative. They could, for example, use a survey at the beginning and the end to see if they’ve met the objectives.

This should be a continuous process: Financial well-being, like physical and mental well-being, is something that needs to be constantly worked on and improved. There’s no easy fix. As employees age or face different hurdles in their lives, there’ll be something new to learn.

One final topic we spoke about in creating an effective financial wellness program: the importance of having high-level support.

“Lead by example,” Miraglia-King said. “Your upper management must set the tone for any campaign you do, and financial wellness is no exception.”

Andie Burjek is a Workforce associate editor. Comment below, or email at aburjek@humancapitalmedia.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.


 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress