OSHA – Workforce

June 2, 2021

Hospital employees are about to lose a vaccination lawsuit against their employer in spectacular fashion

Some 117 employees have sued their employer, Houston Methodist Hospital, over its requirement that all employees receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

According to ABC News, the hospital gave its employees a June 7 deadline to get vaccinated or face suspension and termination. The employees allege that their employer is “illegally requiring its employees to be injected with an experimental vaccine as a condition of employment.” The lawsuit adds that the hospital’s vaccine requirement violates the “Nuremberg Code and the public policy of the state of Texas.”

In a statement, hospital CEO Dr. Marc Boom said, “It is unfortunate that the few remaining employees who refuse to get vaccinated and put our patients first are responding in this way. It is legal for health care institutions to mandate vaccines, as we have done with the flu vaccine since 2009. The COVID-19 vaccines have proven through rigorous trials to be very safe and very effective and are not experimental.”

Dr. Boom is 100 percent correct; the hospital’s policy is legal. Here’s why, and why this lawsuit will fail spectacularly.

1. The EEOC expressly says that mandatory vaccine policies are 100 percent legal (as long as an employer makes allowances to accommodate employees whose underlying disabilities, sincerely held religious beliefs, practices, or observances, or pregnancy prevents them from getting vaccinated). Because I’ve seen zero references that any of the 117 plaintiffs are claiming an ADA or Title VII violation, I conclude that the hospital has met its legal obligations in this regard. (Note, however, that Texas is considering pending legislation that would make “COVID-19 vaccination status” a protected class under its employment discrimination law.)

2. Public policy actually favors as many individuals getting vaccinated as possible. Just ask the Biden White House, the CDC, the EEOC, OSHA, just about any other government agency, and even the State of Texas (although its governor did sign an Executive Order prohibiting government entities from compelling that anyone receives a COVID-19 vaccine administered under an emergency use authorization). Note also that there are efforts underway in states across the country (e.g., Ohio) to prohibit a business from mandating vaccines or permitting individuals to decline a required vaccine based on medical contraindications, natural immunity, or reasons of conscience.

3. The Nuremberg Code is not a thing, at least not in this context. In fact, there’s been a lot of chatting lately about the Nuremberg Code as a justification to refuse vaccine mandates. It’s wrong and it’s offensive. It’s a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created as a result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II. It was a reaction to the medical atrocities committed by Dr. Josef Mengele and other Nazis during the war, with the intent of protecting people from suffering similar atrocities. To compare Nazi war crimes to a life-saving vaccine that has been tested and vetted is the height of disgusting selfishness.

Bottom line: If you want to mandate that your employees get vaccinated as a condition of employment, you are legally in the clear to do so, subject to reasonable accommodation exceptions under the ADA for disabled employees, and under Title VII for employees’ sincerely held religious beliefs, practices, or observances, and for pregnant employees. Any other gripes, complaints, or objections by employees are just smokescreens that you can legally ignore, at least for now.

May 19, 2021

OSHA sends employers a strong signal that it intends to follow the CDC on masks

One open issue stemming from the CDC’s about-face on masking for the fully vaccinated is how OSHA would address these new guidelines. When OSHA published its Guidance on Mitigating and Preventing the Spread of COVID-19 in the Workplace in late January, it made it clear that one’s vaccination status had zero impact on an employer’s obligation to require masks in all cases.

Workers who are vaccinated must continue to follow protective measures, such as wearing a face covering and remaining physically distant, because at this time, there is not evidence that COVID-19 vaccines prevent transmission of the virus from person-to-person.

In the world of COVID-19, 3 ½ months is an eternity, so here we are just 3 ½ months later living in a country without facial coverings for the fully vaccinated. So what says OSHA?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued new guidance relating to recommended precautions for people who are fully vaccinated, which is applicable to activities outside of healthcare and a few other environments. OSHA is reviewing the recent CDC guidance and will update our materials on this website accordingly. Until those updates are complete, please refer to the CDC guidance for information on measures appropriate to protect fully vaccinated workers.

Until further notice, the story on masks at work remains as follows:

Fully vaccinated employees = maskless, if they choose.
Unvaccinated employees = masks.

As for me, I’ll be OK going maskless in places in which I know everyone else maskless is also fully vaccinated. Otherwise (hello Costco, and any other store that is putting people on the honor system) I’ll be keeping my mask on until further notice.

If the last year has taught me anything it’s that if left to their own devices too many people will fail to do the right thing. I just don’t trust that everyone maskless will be fully vaccinated. There just seems to be too high of a correlation between those who are anti-vax, anti-mask, and pro “liberty.” So thank you, maskless and unvaccinated. Your selfishness will require me to keep wearing a mask in many public places.

April 26, 2021

Another reason not to mandate the COVID-19 vaccine for employees

I’ve not hidden my belief that employers should not be mandating that their employees receive the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of employment. Now, OSHA offers yet another reason why employers should recommend, but not mandate, the vaccine.

Per OSHA, if the vaccine is mandatory, then an employer must record an employee’s adverse reaction or side effects on its OSHA log.

If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?

If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.

I do not require my employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine. However, I do recommend that they receive the vaccine and may provide it to them or make arrangements for them to receive it offsite. If an employee has an adverse reaction to the vaccine, am I required to record it?

No. Although adverse reactions to recommended COVID-19 vaccines may be recordable…, OSHA is exercising its enforcement discretion to only require the recording of adverse effects to required vaccines at this time. Therefore, you do not need to record adverse effects from COVID-19 vaccines that you recommend, but do not require.

A few more points that OSHA made about this issue.

1. To avoid reporting, the vaccine must be truly voluntary and an employee cannot suffer any repercussions from that choice. For example, an employee’s choice to accept or reject the vaccine cannot affect a performance rating, bonus payment, or professional advancement. An employee who chooses not to receive the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from this choice.

2. The method by which employees might receive a recommended vaccine does not matter. This rule also applies even if an employer makes the COVID vaccine available onsite or otherwise makes arrangements for employees to receive it offsite. As long it the employee’s choice is voluntary, side effects and reactions are not recordable.

So there you have it. Yet another reason not to mandate that employees receive the COVID vaccine — the administrative burden of recording reactions and side effects, and the risk of potential OSHA citations and fines for failing to do so.

April 15, 2021

OSHA finally gets real about COVID-19 safety

Consider the following COVID-19 safety and health violations OSHA recently uncovered at a Massachusetts tax preparation business.

Employees and customers were prohibited from wearing face coverings in the workplace despite a statewide mask order that mandated the business to require employees and customers to wear masks.
Employees were required to work within 6 feet of each other and of customers for multiple hours while not wearing face coverings.
Adequate means of ventilation in the workplace were not provided.
Controls such as physical barriers, pre-shift screening of employees, enhanced cleaning, and other methods to reduce the potential for person-to-person transmission of the virus were not implemented.

What did these violations cost this employer in OSHA penalties? $5,000? $10,000? $25,000?

How about $136,532!

According to OSHA Regional Administrator Galen Blanton in Boston, “This employer’s willful refusal to implement basic safeguards places her employees at an increased risk of contracting and spreading the coronavirus. Stopping the spread of this virus requires business’ support in implementing COVID-19 Prevention Programs, and ensuring that staff and customers wear face coverings and maintain physical distance from each other.”

This appears to be the first company cited under OSHA’s recently launched national emphasis program focusing on COVID-19 enforcement efforts. If you’ve waited for the past 13 months without taking COVID safety seriously in your business, you better do so now. OSHA is watching, and based on this one example, violations are going to be quite expensive.

March 1, 2021

Employee grievances including wage theft, COVID-19 concerns come to a head for one brewery

The sign on the door of Platform Beer’s Columbus, Ohio, taproom reads: “The entire Platform Columbus crew has quit. The taproom is closed until further notice. Thank you!”

The employees and their former(?) employer are battling it out on Twitter.

-vs-

Oliver Northern, the employee leading the walkout, told Alive Columbus that “employees started seriously discussing walking out about a week ago, frustrated by a growing list of grievances that he said the company had not taken steps to address.” He added that they initially intended to use the walkout as a bargaining tool with management, but that conditions had gotten so bad that no one had any interest in remaining with the company no matter its response.

What does it all mean?

1. If these employees simply walked off the job in protest instead of quitting their jobs, an alphabet soup of employment laws would have protected their jobs. The NLRA (protected concreted activity), FLSA (wage and hours), and OSHA (safety) are just a few examples of anti-retaliation protections these employees would enjoy. Because, however, these employees quit, these anti-retaliation measures are largely moot (although I could craft an argument that post-employment retaliatory acts such as defamation could still trigger one or more of these statutes).

2. This employer has a massive PR mess. No matter how meritorious or genuine the employees’ claims, the employees thought enough of them to quit their jobs en masse. An employer simply cannot allow these issues to fester until they boil over into a mass protest. If an employer doesn’t know that its employees have these concerns, then that employer’s managers and supervisors aren’t doing their jobs. They are your eyes and ears, and they must understand their role as such.

Moreover, open-door policies and other prophylactic measures aren’t worth their weight if you don’t take them (and the issues employees bring to you) seriously.

February 24, 2021

How much does it cost an employer for not following COVID-19 safety rules?

construction, mask, mobile technology, COVID-19

OSHA has cited a Missouri auto parts manufacturer for failing to implement and enforce coronavirus protections, which ultimately lead to an employee’s death. The details, from OSHA’s news release.

Two machine operators … who jointly operated a press tested positive for the coronavirus just two days apart, in late August 2020. The two workers typically labored for hours at a time less than two feet apart; neither wore a protective facial mask consistently. Ten days later, two more workers operating similar presses together tested positive. On Sept. 19, 2020, one of the press operators fell victim to the virus and died.

The total penalty was $15,604. For someone who died during a global pandemic because of his employer’s irresponsibility.

Since the pandemic started, OSHA has issued citations arising from more than 300 inspections for violations relating to coronavirus. The average penalty is $13,101.27.

While I understand that OSHA lacks a specific standard covering most COVID-19 issues, these numbers seem awfully low. Look, I’ll be the first one to tell you that more government regulation and control is a bad thing.

But, if employers aren’t motivated by the carrot to take COVID-19 seriously (that being, having a healthy and safe workplace with employees who believe you care about their welfare), then perhaps they need the stick. Some $13,000, or $15,600 when someone dies, however, seems like a pretty small stick.

February 22, 2021September 13, 2022

Prepare for the glut of COVID-19 whistleblower tag-along claims

fulfillment center, distribution center, COVID-19

The headline reads, “Ex-Manager Sues Ample Hills in Lawsuit Alleging Harassment and Unsafe COVID-19 Protocols” (boldface/emphasis mine).

Here’s the lede:

Bryce Mottram, a former general manager at one of quirky ice cream purveyor Ample Hills’ scoop shops, has filed a lawsuit in New York Eastern District Court alleging that he was fired from the company in retaliation for speaking up about instances of sexual harassment and unsafe COVID-19 workplace protocols at the company.

I firmly believe that for the next year-plus, just about every employment-related lawsuit will contain a COVID-19 whistleblower tag-along claim.

In other words, employees will sue for discrimination and safety-related retaliation, or harassment and safety-related retaliation, or breach of contract and safety-related retaliation, or fill-in-the blank and safety-related retaliation. I’ve already seen it happen in cases, and it makes an already complicated employment dispute that much more complicated and dangerous.

This likely reality means that employers must double down on implementing and enforcing COVID-19 safety rules in the workplace. Have a written COVID-19 safety policy and strictly enforce it. If you don’t know what should be in this policy, OSHA recently published a terrific guide.

Separate and send home infected or potentially infected people from the workplace.
Implement physical distancing in all communal work areas, including remote work and telework.
Install barriers where physical distancing cannot be maintained.
Suppress the spread of the hazard using appropriate and properly worn face coverings.
Improve ventilation.
Provide the supplies necessary for good hygiene practices.
Perform routine cleaning and disinfection.

These points are just a start, and I recommend you consult with OSHA counsel or a COVID-19-knowledgable safety consultant to draft and implement your plan (including training your employees).

February 2, 2021

As new COVID-19 variants double down on transmissibility, OSHA steps up preventative measures

“Wear a mask and stay 6 feel apart.” It might sound like Groundhog Day to keep repeating this mantra. It’s also the most basic and most important steps we can take to remain safe, healthy and COVID-free.

Last week OSHA published new guidance for employers about mitigating and preventing the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. While I recommend you read it, understand it and adopt its teachings in your workplace as best practices to keep your employees safe and healthy, I want to draw your attention to this language.

Not distinguishing between workers who are vaccinated and those who are not: Workers who are vaccinated must continue to follow protective measures, such as wearing a face covering and remaining physically distant, because at this time, there is not evidence that COVID-19 vaccines prevent transmission of the virus from person-to-person. The CDC explains that experts need to understand more about the protection that COVID-19 vaccines provide before deciding to change recommendations on steps everyone should take to slow the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19.

COVID-19 is strengthening. New variants of the virus are making it more transmissible and potentially more virulent. Now is not the time to loosen COVID safety rules, especially around the most basic of steps we must take to remain safe and healthy—masks and physical distancing. This holds true even if your employees are vaccinated, as science does not yet know if the vaccine prevents the transmission from person-to-person.

The vaccine does offer us a light at the end of the very long and dark COVID tunnel, but we cannot allow it to give us a false sense of security. COVID-19 is fighting back; we must continue to fight back, too.

January 25, 2021

Biden calls for unemployment benefits to employees who refuse to work because of COVID

employment law, labor law, overtime records

Late last week, President Biden signaled that part of his overall plan to provide economic relief for American families and businesses amid the COVID-19 crisis is to broaden the availability of unemployment benefits to employees who quit their jobs related to Covid.

Specifically, the president is “asking the U.S. Department of Labor to consider clarifying that workers who refuse unsafe working conditions can still receive unemployment insurance.”

Allowing employees who quit in the name of “safety” to receive unemployment benefits presents a potential staffing nightmare for employers, especially considering that the America Rescue Plan (Biden’s the $1.9 trillion stimulus package being debated on Capitol Hill) proposes an additional $400 per week unemployment payments through the end of September. In Ohio, for example, that payment would increase the maximum weekly unemployment benefit to $1,072 (equivalent to an hourly wage of $26.80 or an annual salary of $55,744). At those numbers, lots of employees might opt to leave their jobs and take an extended, well-compensated vacation until the pandemic ends.

Allowing employees to qualify for unemployment merely by “refusing unsafe working conditions, which would make the employees the masters of whether or not they qualify, I proposed that the DOL instead limit qualification to employees who have tangible evidence of a health or safety violation by the employer that does not allow the employee to practice social distancing, hygiene, wear protective equipment, or otherwise unreasonably exposes the employee to a greater risk of contracting COVID-19.” A great starting point is the new COVID guidance President Biden has ordered OSHA to draft and emergency temporary standards Biden has ordered it to consider.

We need to make sure that we have rules that strike the proper balance between employees who have a legitimate reason not to work because of COVID-19, and employees who simply don’t want to work. Merely allowing employees to make that decision in their own exercise of discretion, and paying them a substantial benefit as a result, does not strike any balance at all.

January 20, 2021

What employers can expect from Biden’s presidency: A temporary emergency OSHA standard for COVID-19

Today marks the one-year anniversary of the identification of the first COVID-19 case in the United States.

On Jan. 20, 2020, the state of Washington and the CDC confirmed that someone in Washington State had contracted the virus. Since then, 24,809,840 additional Americans have contracted COVID, and 411,520 have died from it.

All the while, OSHA, the federal agency charged with protecting health and safety in the workplace, has done very little to address the pandemic, and we still lack a national safety standard on keeping COVID-safe at work.

President Biden’s OSHA will fix this glaring omission. He has called on Congress “to authorize the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to issue a COVID-19 Protection Standard that covers a broad set of workers.”

What issues should we expect this OSHA standard to address?

Mandatory masking.
Mandatory physical distancing.
Required sanitization and housekeeping.
Standards for engineering and airflow.
Required employee training.
Increased reporting requirements.

Some of these, like masking and distancing, should be second-nature at this point, but sadly have become overly politicized and ignored by too many. I applaud anything President Biden does in an attempt to get his pandemic under control and save lives so that we all can get back to living ours.