Skip to content

Workforce

Tag: sexual harassment

Posted on April 27, 2021

Why would a company wait a year to implement an anti-harassment program?

sexual harassment prevention requirements

McDonald’s has lots of secrets. What’s in its sauce? What part of the chicken do the McNuggets come from? How come every time I crave a cone the soft-serve machine is out of order? Why do their soft drinks taste better than anyone else’s?

Something that’s not a secret, however, is that McDonald’s has a serious sexual harassment problem.

From CBS News:
Young women from across the country with remarkably similar accounts of workplace abuse and harassment at one of America’s largest, most iconic fast-food restaurant chains: McDonald’s: ”

“He would make comments on my body, and other workers’ bodies, saying, like, ‘I would have sex with you, I wouldn’t have sex with her,'” said Emily Anibal.

“First he was like, ‘You have nice hair,’ started touching my hair,” said Jamelia Fairley. “Then he was like, physical; then he actually started grabbing my butt.”

Kat Barber said, “Any woman that he could get his hands on or be near, he was taking advantage of that moment.”

Kimberly Lawson said, “It kind of made me feel isolated. I thought I was the only one this is happening to right now, you know what I’m saying? So, I just felt, like, completely alone.”

Lawson, Fairley, Barber and Anibal have all either filed discrimination charges or filed suit against McDonald’s corporate restaurants or their independently-owned franchises. Each tells a story of persistent and unwanted harassment from male co-workers.
In response, CEO Chris Kempczinski said the following:
Let me say plainly: every single person working under the Arches must have a safe and respectful work environment. Sexual harassment in the workplace is an affront to everything we stand for as a System. It has no place in any McDonald’s restaurant, and it will not be tolerated.
If, as Kempczinski added, McDonald’s takes “these allegations very seriously,” and “must acknowledge our mistakes and make them right,” why then is the company waiting until next year to mandate a new anti-harassment program?

Per ABC News, beginning January 2022 the company will mandate new employee training to combat harassment, discrimination, and violence in all 39,000 of its restaurants worldwide. According to Kempczinski, the details are still being worked out, but he expects training at the time of hire plus annual training for all employees.

While this is all makes sense, why does it take nine months to implement this training? McDonald’s has a serious problem that it needs to solve, and all waiting until next year won’t solve anything. McDonald’s is not some rinky-dink company.

It’s a $5 billion corporation with more than enough resources to fund a quick and thorough solution to this problem. A nine-month wait is simply not acceptable, especially considering this training is something it should already have in place and should have been providing to its employees for decades.

Posted on December 14, 2020December 14, 2020

If you’re tired of reading about the Worst Employer voting, you can now hear me talk about it

Marc Alifanz and Kate Bischoff are two of my favorite people. They also happen to host one of my favorite podcasts, Hostile Work Environment. I promise that I’m not just dishing out these high praises because Marc and Kate invited me to guest on this week’s episode to discuss the 10 nominees for this year’s Worst Employer poll.

You can listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you choose to get your podcasts. (And while you’re there do us all a favor and click that subscribe button if you already haven’t.)

This post also serves as your final warning to get in your vote for this year’s nominees. Polls close at 11:59 p.m. Wednesday, Dec. 16. Over 1,000 of you have already voted (thank you!), and the margins (at least in the COVID-19 category) are razor-thin. A few votes either way could literally decide this year’s winner. Make sure your voice is heard. No whining about the results if you don’t vote.

Voting is available at this link. Remember that this year’s vote is different than years past in that we have two categories — Worst Employer and Worst Employer COVID-19 Edition. In each category, you rank each of the five nominees from 1 (worst) to 5 (least worst). Ranking all five is important because the relative rankings count in the final tally.

The polls are open until 11:59 p.m. Wednesday, Dec. 16, and I’ll announce the winners (err … losers) early next week. Continued bad luck to all of this year’s very worthy nominees.

Posted on May 4, 2020June 29, 2023

HR needs to build employee trust to address sexual harassment

sexual harassment prevention requirements

While the #MeToo movement has brought some high-profile results including the imprisonment of Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby, the reality is that in general there have been few consequences for harassers. 

This is especially true for populations of employees especially vulnerable to sexual harassment, including low-wage workers in the retail and service industries. Looking at data from 1995 to 2016, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received more complaints of sexual harassment from the restaurant industry than from any other industry, according to Time. Retail employees, meanwhile, occupy the No. 2 spot in number of sexual harassment complaints filed. 

trust, HR, sexual harassmentAccording to digital media company Racked, what makes service workers vulnerable to sexual harassment includes low wages and complicated, ineffective complaint processes that rarely lead to any consequences. Further, harassers know they can prey on vulnerable workers who are often women or people of color because they can use these vulnerabilities against the person they’re harassing and take advantage of a power imbalance, according to Racked.

As rampant as sexual harassment is, offenders often get away with it and victims don’t believe their complaint will go anywhere. Meanwhile, HR may get the reputation of being more interested in protecting the company than protecting the victim. 

Fifteen percent of employees have been sexually harassed according to “The State of Humanity at Work,” a spring 2020 report from software company Workhuman, which surveyed 2,613 full-time employees. But that number is probably higher given the sensitivity of the topic, the report noted. Of these people, 39 percent said they don’t trust their HR department. Only 47 percent of women and 66 percent of men who have been sexually harassed reported it.

“This mistrust is further manifested in low numbers of people reporting harassment. Changing these numbers is going to take work building up trust and showing commitment to listening and respect,” according to the report. 

What employees can do after being sexually harassed

File a formal complaint: Despite employee concerns that HR will do nothing, filing a formal complaint is still a good idea. 

If your company has a specific procedure for handling sexual harassment complaints, employees should follow it to the letter, taking note of every detail, like any time limits set out in that policy, advises law firm Allred, Maroko & Goldberg. In the case where a company has no formal procedure, an employee can start by reporting the harassment to their immediate supervisor, and, in the case where the supervisor is the one doing the harassing, report it to that supervisor’s manager. “It is important, particularly in hostile environment cases, to make sure that your company’s management knows of the harassment,” the law firm’s blog noted. 

Keep records of everything: If an employee has any uncomfortable incident with their harasser, they can keep a log of times, dates and exactly what the person said or did for reference. They can also note witnesses who may be able to corroborate the incident. When they have digital evidence like texts, emails or instant messages to screenshot, that is further evidence to bring to HR with their complaint. 

Being thorough and detailed is important here. The more details and evidence someone has, the better.

Further steps an employee can take: Sometimes a harassment victim is unable to resolve your harassment complaint by using your employer’s internal procedures, the law firm blog noted. If they still want to pursue the complaint, they can turn to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or their state’s human rights or civil rights enforcement agency next. 

This can lead to several outcomes. The agency may decide not to proceed with the complaint but issue the victim a “right to sue” notice, allowing them to bring the case to court. The agency may also choose to file their own lawsuit against the employer.

A lawsuit is not the route an employer wants to take. That’s one reason it’s important to HR to step up and take sexual harassment cases more seriously. 

“HR is like the CIA — when we do the right thing (like getting rid of a harasser) employees might never know about it, but when we screw up (like protecting a harasser), everyone knows,” said Kate Bischoff, an employment attorney at tHRive Law & Consulting LLC. This only magnifies the reputation of HR as a department that ignores critical culture issues like sexual harassment. 

If this is the reputation of HR — and at times it is the reputation HR departments have earned, Bischoff said — then HR professionals must work harder to build trust with employees. They can get to know employees, ask them how they’re doing and find out what HR can do to help with any issues they’re having. 

Building these relationships may help people feel like HR is trustworthy and will take sexual harassment seriously.

HR’s role in building employee trust

“The best way to build a connection with employees is to create a human-centered culture. Leaders can do this by keeping the line of communication open and providing frequent check-ins,” Bischoff said. “[And] good HR professionals build trust and take action to prevent and stop harassment.”

The report stressed the importance of a “human workplace,” defined as an environment where people are allowed to be human, make mistakes and treat each other with empathy, Bischoff said. “If we see each other as humans, we’re more likely to speak up when things are not right, when there are problems, and when we believe we’ve been harassed,” she added. 

Not addressing sexual harassment has a clear negative impact on employees, but it can also adversely affect employers through turnover. Of the 21 percent of employees who are actively looking for a new job, 33 percent have been sexually harassed at work, according to the survey. This number is probably higher, the survey stated. 

The “lawyerly” reason organizations should take sexual harassment more seriously is because of the risks they face due to bad press, lawsuits, charges of discrimination and the costs of settlement. But there’s much more to consider than reputational and financial damage. “Good organizations hear the lawyerly response more clearly, but great organizations hear the human response more clearly,” Bischoff said.

When sexual harassment occurs, a company is not providing an environment for employees in which they can do their best work and voice their concerns, she said. The company is treating their employees poorly, and it’s not providing the best services or products to its clients and customers as well. 

The Workhuman report found that of the women who reported being sexually harassed, 29 percent did not get their claim investigated, Of the men reporting sexual harassment, 12 percent did not get their claim investigated.

This may also contribute to mistrust in HR, Bischoff said. “There’s no good reason for harassment not to be investigated,” Bischoff said. “Serious allegations of harassment should always be investigated.”

Posted on March 4, 2020June 29, 2023

What “Sexy Vixen Vinyl” teaches us about porn at work

fox news, porn at work

If you’re Fox News reporter Brit Hume, you have a lot of explaining to do. Yesterday, the venerable journalist carelessly tweeted out his internet exploration of “Sexy Vixen Vinyl.”

fox news, porn at work

Some would say Hume made an innocent mistake. Trying to share a story on updated election odds, he tweeted a photo of his screen forgetting about his list of open tabs. I’d say that the fact that he was looking at “Sexy Vixen Vinyl” at work eliminates any innocence in this mistake. That website simply has no place in the workplace, period.

That said, I can guarantee that Brit Hume is not the first employee in history to surf over to “Sexy Vixen Vinyl” on a work computer. This is as good a time as any, therefore, to review your “workplace pornography” policy. While you might not have this policy per se, you should have an “internet use” policy, which should address each of the following—

1. What does your internet-use policy say, does it include prohibitions against pornography, and does it sufficiently and clearly explain that violations will result in discipline, up to and including termination?

2. Do you block websites that might include adult material, or do you trust employees to their own devices? Keep in mind that if you opt for the latter, many adult websites are rife with malware, viruses, and other things that you likely don’t want on work equipment. Also keep in mind that if you opt for the former, you may need to provide for work-related exceptions (like an employment lawyer researching a case, and I speak from experience).

3. If you are overly concerned that your workplace is rife with porn, you could opt for a porn audit, examining all of your technology assets for inappropriate material.

4. Once you become aware of any pornography in the workplace, your obligation as an employer kicks in to promptly investigate and implement reasonable corrective action. Failure to act could subject you to a nasty and expensive sexual harassment lawsuit.

5. Finally, if your investigation leads you to believe that the pornography involves illegal activity (e.g., children), immediately stop and call your lawyer, as this is a serious issue that needs serious treatment.

Also read: What you can learn from the law firm partner suspended for watching porn at work

Also read: Could your company be liable for child-porn viewing?

Posted on February 24, 2020June 29, 2023

The 4th nominee for the Worst Employer of 2020 is … the Perverted Peking-duck Purveyor

sexual harassment prevention requirements

worst employer of 2020 trophy Every year I worry about how I’m going to fill my annual list of worst employers. I’ve yet to be disappointed.

The EEOC recently filed suit against a Medford, Oregon, Chinese restaurant after its middle-aged night-shift manager repeatedly sexually harassed young female employees.

The allegations are horrific. The manager is accused of the following.

  • Repeatedly making sexual comments, sexual innuendos, and remarks to female employees.
  • Repeatedly touching female employees’ backs, shoulders, waist, hip/crotch area, buttocks, rubbing his body up against female employees’ bodies, and standing close behind female employees and staring at them.
  • Repeatedly touching the breasts of female employees including putting his hand under a female employee’s shirt and bra.
  • Pulling on the shirt and bra of a female employee to expose her nipple.
  • Asking a 15-year-old female employee to send him naked photos of herself.

Yet, those allegations, as awful as they are, aren’t what earned this employer its nomination. It’s what happened after the victims complained that placed this employer on this year’s list.

According to the EEOC—

Even after the manager … was arrested at work and booked for sexual abuse of the restaurant’s minor employee, he was permitted to return to work.… Despite repeated employee complaints and the manager’s guilty plea to misdemeanor harassment, the restaurant failed to stop his behavior or discharge him. Instead, New China fired one female employee soon after she reported his inappropriate conduct and another female employee felt she had no choice but to resign.

If you enable your 50-something manager to sexually harass your teenage workforce, even after employees complain and he’s arrested for and convicted of harassment, you might be the worst employer of 2020.

Previous nominees:

The 1st Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2020 Is … the Repeat, Repeat Offender

The 2nd nominee for Worst Employer of 2020 is … the Uncaring Chief

The 3rd nominee for the Worst Employer of 2020 is … the Arresting Retaliator

Posted on February 14, 2020June 29, 2023

Google’s head of HR steps down amid long standing employee tensions

Google

Eileen Naughton, vice president of Google’s people operations, announced that she will be stepping down from her position later this year to be closer to her family. The company said in a Feb. 11 press release that she will not be leaving Google altogether but will be transitioning into a different role at the company that has not yet been specified. 

During Naughton’s time as vice president of people at Google, she has had to deal with a series of conflicts within the company’s workforce, such as sexual harassment claims that lead to mass walkouts at several office locations, wrongful termination of several employees and being criticized for diversity issues.Google

During the backlash, Naughton led an effort to make it easier for employees to report misconduct by introducing a new program that allows employees to bring a friend with them to human resources when they file a complaint and during the investigative process as well, according to Fortune. The article also stated that Naughton responded to criticism about Google’s poor treatment toward its U.S. temporary workers who lacked many benefits that their staff receives by implementing new standards including a $15 minimum wage, health care and parental leave.

Dania Shaheen, vice president of strategy and people operations at Kazoo, said that while Google has been known as a leading company to work in the tech world, they are now learning some valuable lessons as they are thrust into the limelight regarding the company’s future and culture. 

“What Google is now learning is that hard-fought gains in employee trust build up over a long time frame can easily be squandered,” Shaheen said via email. “While this change management situation may seem dire at the moment, there’s hope for Google and other companies out there going through changes in their cultures.”

In terms of Google’s next steps, Shaheen said they need to revisit what made it such a great company in the first place — its culture — to rebuild the trust with their employees, which begins with the company’s leaders. 

“For a company’s culture to flourish, the key is to build a purpose-driven culture of high engagement and high performance within the workforce, and one that evolves as the organizations evolves,” Shaheen said. “One of the best ways to ensure culture will flourish within an organization is to create an environment of trust, transparency and open communication.” 

Considering Google’s extended experience with facing backlash and employee tension over the last several months, management burnout is something to also think about. Shaheen says that every company is bound to experience these types of significant changes at some point, and that change can be especially difficult to deal with in the workplace. 

“To avoid management and employee burnout in these situations, company leaders can involve managers early on in the change management process to embrace, promote and facilitate the changes that need to happen,” Shaheen said. “When managers aren’t completely aligned or involved with the organizational change, employees hear mixed messages and feel ambivalent toward the initiatives. While leadership drives desired culture changes, it’s imperative to solicit feedback and input from everyone impacted.” 

In times of turmoil in an organization, the role of HR leaders is to provide clear communications expectations and not to assume that all managers will know the expectations for sharing information with their teams, Shaheen said. 

“By keeping the employee front and center during all change management initiatives and conversations, companies can help reduce management and employee burnout during times of significant change.”

Posted on February 12, 2020June 29, 2023

Even though this employer won its ex-employee’s retaliation lawsuit, don’t do what it did

employment law

Family businesses are difficult to manage. They become even more difficult when the owners are spouses, and an employee accuses one of sexual harassment.

For example, consider Allen v. Ambu-Stat.

D’Marius Allen worked as an EMT for Ambu-Stat, owned by husband and wife Santos and Rita Ortiz. During the four months Allen worked for Ambu-Stat, she claimed that Santos subjected her to sporadic instances of verbal sexual harassment. For example, he told her she was “pretty” and “fine as hell.” She also alleged he made three sexually suggestive comments to her.

Three months into Allen’s employment, Rita called her into her office and accused her of discussing her sex life with Santos. Allen demurred that Santos started any sexual conversations between them. Rita ended that meeting by warning Allen that it was inappropriate to discuss her personal life with Santos, as he was her employer. One week later, Rita delivered a disciplinary employee correction form to Allen for having had an “inappropriate conversation” with Santos while on duty. The form stated that “having such conversations while on duty with co-workers (or especially with my husband) is extremely inappropriate and unacceptable.”

Allen responded by explaining to Rita, in writing, that Santos had asked her if her boyfriend was good at oral sex, in response to a lyric in a song on the radio. Allen also wrote that she did want to be “involved in any sexual harassment.” Finding Allen’s explanation to be “outlandish,” “disturbing,” and “full of lies,” Rita terminated her.

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Allen’s retaliation claim. The court differentiated between bona fide opposition to unlawful discrimination or harassment (protected), as compared to an attempt to apologize and mend fences (not protected). The court concluded that Allen had engaged in the latter. Case dismissed. Employer wins.

This decision is baffling. Allen was in an extraordinarily difficult situation, harassed by one owner-spouse and having to justify her action to the other owner-spouse. She should not have to use “magic words” to express her discomfort in the situation. (Never mind that she actually did use the magic word “harassment”.)

An employer has the same anti-harassment and anti-retaliation obligations to an employee whether the accused harasser is a line worker or an owner. Take the allegations seriously, investigate, correct and do not retaliate. Ambu-Stat failed on each of these steps and is very lucky to have walked out of this case free and clear.

Posted on January 15, 2020June 29, 2023

Frivolous Litigation Has a Price … Sometimes a Big Price

employment law, labor law, overtime records

In 2005, Monika Starke filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC alleging that her employer, CRST Van Expedited, Inc., subjected her to sexual harassment.

The EEOC expanded that initial charge into a federal-court lawsuit over whether CRST engaged in sexual harassment against myriad of its female driver trainees.

What followed was 14 years of litigation, several trips to the court of appeals, one trip to the U.S. Supreme Court, and an attorney-fee award of over $3.3 million against the EEOC for frivolous, unreasonable, or groundless conduct in the filing and prosecution of the underlying claims.

The issue that lead to the large fee award was the EEOC’s heavy-handed prosecution of a pattern-or-practice harassment claim, even though it did not plead such a claim in its complaint.

Late last year, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the fee award (which had previously been reduced on appeal from an initial award of $4.5 million).

As the master of its own complaint, it was frivolous, unreasonable and/or groundless for the EEOC to fail to allege a pattern-or-practice violation and then proceed to premise the theory of its case on such a claim. Claims necessarily premised on the inclusion of this claim are likewise frivolous, unreasonable and/or groundless.

As attorneys, we are responsible for our conduct in litigation. When that conduct gets out of hand or crosses the line, there are often consequences. Sometimes, those consequences are harsh, even if warranted. In this case, the EEOC learned a tough lesson, hopefully one that will end one of the longest running discrimination cases in history.

Posted on January 6, 2020June 29, 2023

The 1st Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2020 Is … the Repeat, Repeat Offender

Jon Hyman The Practical Employer

If there’s a better way of starting 2020 than with the first nominee for the year’s worst employer, I’m not sure what it is.

Meet Dru DiSilvestro, the manager at an electrical contractor in Elmer, NJ, accused of sexually harassing Kimberly North, a 23-year-old employee, while in the midst of litigation brought by another employee accusing DiSilvestro of flashing his penis and leaving a dildo on her desk. And that wasn’t even the first lawsuit accusing DiSilvestro of harassment. His employer settled another even earlier suit accusing him of sexually crude language.

According to the New York Post, “North says DiSilvestro for years made comments about her ‘hot body,’ grabbed his crotch while making lewd faces at her and asked her about her sexual preferences.” Further, when she broke up with her boyfriend, “DiSilvestro allegedly sent her a text … of a porno video and a GIF of a woman performing a sex act on a man.” Her lawsuit includes screenshots of the alleged text messages.

Worse yet, when North complained to DiSilvestro’s bosses they did nothing, even though they were already in the middle of defending the penis-and-dildo lawsuit. Eventually, North took a leave of absence because of the anxiety of working with DiSilvestro, and quit a month later. Her lawsuit soon followed.

If you ignore complaints of egregious sexual harassment brought by an employee while already litigating similarly awful claims of sexual harassment brought by another employee against the same supervisor, you might be the worst employer of 2020.

Posted on December 3, 2019June 29, 2023

The 20th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Malignant Mogul

Jon Hyman The Practical Employer

The 20th (and final) nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 is Alki David, heir to the Coca-Cola bottling fortune and owner of several media firms.

The evidence?

This week, a jury awarded over $58 million to a female employee who accused him of thrusting his pelvis into her face, simulating oral sex, moaning and zipping up his pants and walking away saying, “Thanks, M.K.”

It’s the third massive sexual abuse verdict leveled against David just this year.

In April a jury ordered David to pay another employee more than $11 million, fired after she refused to have sex with him. And in October, yet another jury awarded another employee over $5 million for allegations that David put his hands on her throat and pushed her chair into a wall, and for telling her that she needed to get supplies for his “rape room.”

For his part, David does not seem to have learned his lesson. “This trial proves that not only is the system broken. It’s in a state of emergency.”

Quite a worthy nominee to end this year’s list.

Come back one week from today, when voting will open to name this year’s Worst Employer. I have a feeling Alki David will have a very nice showing when the votes are counted.

Previous Nominees:

The 1st Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Philandering Pharmacist

The 2nd Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Little Rascal Racist

The 3rd Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 is … the Barbarous Boss

The 4th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 is… the Flagrant Farmer

The 5th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 is… the Fishy Fishery 

The 6th Nominee for Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Diverse Discriminator

The 7th Nominee for Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Disability Debaser

The 8th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Lascivious Leader

The 9th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Fertile Firing

The 10th Nominee for Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Exorcising Employee

The 11th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the ****y Supervisor

The 12th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Disguised Doctor

The 13th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Excoriating Executives
The 14th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Horrible Harasser
The 15th Nominee For The ‘Worst Employer of 2019’ Is … The Disability Demoter
The 16th Nominee for the “Worst Employer of 2019” Is … the Shameful Wall Builder
The 17th Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2019 Is … the Mauling Manager

Posts navigation

Page 1 Page 2 … Page 4 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress