Skip to content

Workforce

Tag: The Practical Employer

Posted on March 25, 2020June 29, 2023

The 5th nominee for the Worst Employer of 2020 is … the coronavirus stimulus snatcher

money, ESOP

Can we just close the poll now and announce today’s nominee the winner?

If anyone can verify the identity of this employer I’d love to know who it is.

Alison Green, over at Ask a Manager, provides the truly awful details.

I work in an administrative role at a national restaurant chain.

I just got off of a conference call with corporate in which they told us that if the U.S. government sends us the proposed stimulus checks due to Covid 19, they plan to absorb the money we receive by cutting our hours to reflect that amount. In other words, if each person receives a check for $1,200, $1,200 will effectively go back to the company. Is this legal?

Legal? Yes.*

Morally repugnant and disgustingly reprehensible? Also, yes.

There is no reason (other than flat-out greed and corporate gluttony) to “absorb” an employee’s stimulus check by reducing working hours in a pro-rata amount. It is just the worst, given the current state of health and financial crisis in which we find ourselves.

If you know of an employer doing awful coronavirus-related things to its employees, please let me know by contacting me or by leaving a comment below. I’d like to think that we are better than this, but sadly I know that many are not. And those that aren’t should be held accountable.

* Note: Employers cannot dock the pay of exempt employees for hours not worked in a week without jeopardizing the employee’s exemption, along with the exemption of employees in the same job classification working for the same managers (subject to limited exceptions).

Previous nominees:

The 1st Nominee for the Worst Employer of 2020 Is … the Repeat, Repeat Offender

The 2nd nominee for Worst Employer of 2020 is … the Uncaring Chief

The 3rd nominee for the Worst Employer of 2020 is … the Arresting Retaliator

The 4th nominee for the Worst Employer of 2020 is … the Perverted Peking-duck Purveyor

Posted on March 23, 2020June 29, 2023

Frequently Asked Questions about Ohio’s coronavirus ‘stay at home’ order

COVID-19, coronavirus, public health crisis

Effective Monday, March 23 at 11:59 p.m., and continuing through at least April 6, the state of Ohio, via an order of Dr. Amy Acton, director of the Ohio Department of Health, has closed all non-essential businesses to help combat the spread of COVID-19. Gov. DeWine stated that he would reevaluate the April 6 end date as necessary.

These closures are mandatory. A copy of the order is available here.

To help answer your most pressing questions about how this stay at home order impacts your business and your employees, I drafted this FAQ.

Also read: During COVID-19 outbreak, utilize your internal communications in your company crisis plan

For additional information and updates on how coronavirus will continue to impact your business, bookmark workforce.com/news, coronaviruslaw.blog or ohioemployerlawblog.com, or subscribe via RSS or email.

Frequently Asked Questions about Ohio’s stay at home order:

Q: What businesses are open and what businesses are closed?
A: All non-essential businesses in Ohio are closed from March 24 through at least April 6.

Q: What are the “essential businesses” that are permitted to remain open?
A: The Stay at Home Order deems the following 26 categories of businesses as “essential.”

  • Healthcare and public health operations, human services operations, essential government functions, and essential infrastructure
  • The critical infrastructure sectors as defined by the Department of Homeland Security
  • Stores that sell groceries and medicine
  • Food, beverage, and licensed marijuana production and agriculture
  • Organizations that provide charitable and social services
  • Religious entities
  • Media
  • First Amendment protected speech
  • Gas stations and businesses needed for transportation
  • Financial and insurance institutions
  • Hardware and supply stores
  • Critical trades
  • Mail, post, shipping, logistics, delivery, and pick-up services
  • Educational institutions
  • Laundry services
  • Restaurants for consumption off-premises
  • Supplies to work from home
  • Supplies for essential businesses and operations
  • Transportation
  • Home-based care and services
  • Residential facilities and services
  • Professional services
  • Manufacture, distribution, and supply chain for critical products and industries
  • Critical labor union functions
  • Hotels and motels
  • Funeral services

Q: We are an “essential business.” What does this mean for us?
A: It means that your physical location is open until further notice, business as usual (as best as can be under the circumstances). Employees who have been diagnosed with coronavirus, who are exhibiting coronavirus-like symptoms, or who have been exposed to coronavirus should remain at home and telework if possible. The State has said that law enforcement should not be stopping people on their way to and from work to confirm the need to travel. Nevertheless, it might not be a bad idea to provide letters to employees documenting the essential nature of the business, just in case. Remember, above all else, despite the essential nature of your business, your employees’ health and safety remain the most important thing.

Register for Jon Hyman’s webinar on Thursday, March 26, “What HR Needs to Know about Coronavirus.”

Q: What social distancing measures must essential businesses follow as a condition to remaining open? 
A: Businesses must take the following proactive measures to ensure compliance with social distancing requirements as a condition to remaining open for business:

  • Designate six-foot distances, with signage, tape, or other means, to ensure six-foot spacing for employees and customers.
  • Have hand sanitizer and other sanitizing products available for employees and customers.
  • Implement separate operating hours for elderly and vulnerable customers.
  • Post online whether a business is open and how best to reach it, and be available to continue services by phone or remotely.

Q: What other actions must all businesses follow regarding the health and welfare of their employees?
A: The Stay at Home Order requires that businesses follow these protocols in managing their employees through this crisis:

  1. Encourage telework and video conferencing when possible.
  2. Actively encourage sick employees to stay home until they are fever-free for 72 hours, symptoms have improved for 72 hours, and at least seven days have passed since the first symptoms began.
  3. Do not require doctors’ notes to validate illnesses or returns to work.
  4. Ensure that sick leave policies are up to date, flexible, and non-punitive to allow sick employees to stay home or non-sick employees to stay home to care for others who are sick.
  5. Separate employees who appear to have acute respiratory illness and send them home immediately.
  6. Reinforce key health and hygiene messages such as staying home when sick, washing ones hands, and proper cough and sneeze etiquette, including hanging posters and providing protection supplies and no-touch receptacles.
  7. Perform frequent enhanced environmental cleanings.
  8. Be prepared to change business practices if needed to maintain critical operations.

Q: Are there any instances in which a “non-essential business” can operate?
A: Non-essential businesses can maintain “minimum basic operations.” As long as employees comply with the above social distancing requirements, non-essential businesses can still engage in the minimum necessary activities to maintain the value of the business’s inventory, preserve the condition of the business’s physical plant and equipment, ensure security, process payroll and employee benefits, facilitate employees to be able to continue to work remotely from their residences, or for related functions.

Q: We are a “non-essential business.” How do we handle our employees in response to this Stay at Home Order?
A: There are myriad questions for non-essential businesses to answer to try to remain open and as operational as possible.

    1. Communication is key. Your employees are worried and scared. Talking to them in person, remotely, or by email is crucial so that they understand what is happening to their jobs.
    2. The Stay at Home Order closes physical places of business that are non-essential, but it does not prohibit the employees of those businesses to work remotely from home.
    3. Wage and hour laws still apply. If employees of non-essential employers are working during the shut-down (i.e., remotely) they must be paid. For hourly workers, this means their regular hourly rate for all hours worked, and time-and-a-half for any overtime after 40 hours worked during the week. For salaried exempt employees, this means their full weekly salary for any week in which they work for even one minute. If employees are not working, then they do not have to be paid, and they would be free to apply for unemployment benefits. It is, however, within a company’s discretion and means to continue paying non-working employees during this shutdown of non-essential businesses.
    4. If you have to cut headcount, you should be furloughing people or laying them off. A furlough is a temporary, short-term layoff with an expectation of recall in the near future. Employees remain on payroll, just with no assigned hours. A layoff is usually of longer duration or permanent and results in the employee’s removal from payroll. This is largely a business decision, not a legal decision. Depending on the terms of an employer’s group health plan, a furlough may permit employees to remain covered. In that case, employers will have to determine how to cover an employee’s share of premiums. A layoff is typically a triggering event for COBRA coverage. If either triggers COBRA, those premiums are typically an employee’s responsibility to pay in full, although employers that are able to do so can choose to pay COBRA premiums for as many months as possible.
    5. Employees who are not working during this shutdown can apply for unemployment from the state. Employers should encouraging non-working employees to apply for these benefits as soon as possible. This should not hurt the employer’s experience or unemployment rating.
    6. Do not forget about paid sick leave and family leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, which takes effect on April 2, 2020. Employees who have been laid off prior to April 2 will not qualify for this emergency paid leave. It is an open issue whether employees who have been furloughed or ordered by the government to stay at home will qualify. The Act provides up to 80 hours of paid sick leave at 100 percent of an employee’s regular rate of pay to employees “subject to a … State … quarantine or isolation order related to COVID-19.” One could interpret the Stay at Home Order as imposing a “State quarantine or isolation order” because it prohibits employees of a non-essential business from working at the business’s physical location. One could also interpret the Order as not imposing a “State quarantine or isolation order” because it has not required employees of non-essential employers to stay at home, but merely closed the physical locations at which they work. I believe the latter interpretation is more reasonable until the state, local, or federal government imposes a broader stay-at-home or quarantine order. Regardless, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act is a floor, not a ceiling, and employers are always able to offer more paid leave benefits than the law requires if they are able and willing to do so.

Q: We have a labor union. Are there any other issues we need to be thinking about?
A: Yes. If a collective bargaining agreement covers any of your employees, you have additional things to think about, including layoffs, recall, bumping, seniority, and super-seniority. Collective bargaining agreements can also have their own provisions for sick leave, PTO, vacation, and severance. If you are thinking of changing these benefits, you may need to first bargain with the union.

COVID-19 is rapidly changing how businesses operate. We recognize that organizations need an extra helping hand right now. So we’re offering our platform for free to new sign-ups over the coming months. Sign up today and our Workforce Success team will gladly provide a personal, online walkthrough of our platform to help you get started.

Posted on March 22, 2020June 29, 2023

Treasury, IRS and Labor announce plan to implement Coronavirus-related paid leave for workers and tax credits for businesses

employee compensation

COVID-19 is rapidly changing how businesses operate. We recognize that organizations need an extra helping hand right now. So we’re offering our GPS clock in tool for free to new sign-ups over the coming months. Sign up today and our Workforce Success team will provide a personal, online walkthrough of our platform to help you get started. It can be fully deployed in 1-2 days.

The Department of Treasury, the Department of Labor, and the IRS announced impending regulations that will help covered businesses navigate the paid family and sick leave provisions of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, including available tax credits, the small employer exemption, and a 30-day non-enforcement grace period.

Refresher: What Leave Does the Act Provide?

employee compensationThe Act provides that eligible employees of covered employees can receive:

1. Up to 80 hours of paid sick leave at 100 percent of the employee’s regular rate pay where the employee is unable to work because the employee is quarantined, and/or experiencing COVID-19 symptoms, and seeking a medical diagnosis, capped per employee at $511 per day and $5,110 in total;

2. Up to 80 hours of paid sick leave at two-thirds of the employee’s regular rate of pay where the employee is unable to work because of a need to care for an individual subject to quarantine, to care for a child whose school is closed or child care provider is unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19, and/or the employee is experiencing substantially similar conditions as specified by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, capped per employee at $200 per day and $2,000 in total; and

3. Up to an additional ten weeks of expanded paid family and medical leave at two-thirds of the employee’s regular rate of pay when the employee is unable to work because of a need to care for a child whose school is closed, or child care provider is unavailable for reasons related to COVID-19, capped per employee at $200 per day and $2,000 in total.

Paid Leave Tax Credits
The Act makes available the following tax credits to help employers pay for this paid sick and family leave:
1. For an employee who is unable to work because of Coronavirus quarantine or self-quarantine, or has Coronavirus symptoms and is seeking a medical diagnosis, eligible employers may receive a tax credit up to $511 per day and $5,110 in the aggregate, for a total of 10 days.

2. For an employee who is caring for someone with Coronavirus, or is caring for a child because the child’s school or child care facility is closed, or the child care provider is unavailable due to the Coronavirus, eligible employers may claim a tax credit for two-thirds of the employee’s regular rate of pay, up to $200 per day and $2,000 in the aggregate, for up to 10 days.

3. In addition to the sick leave credit, for an employee who is unable to work because of a need to care for a child whose school or child care facility is closed or whose child care provider is unavailable due to the Coronavirus, eligible employers may receive a refundable child care leave credit. This credit is equal to two-thirds of the employee’s regular rate of pay, capped at $200 per day or $10,000 in the aggregate, for up to 10 weeks.

4. Eligible employers are entitled to an additional tax credit determined based on costs to maintain health insurance coverage for eligible employees during the leave period.

Eligible employers who pay qualifying sick or child care leave will be able to retain an amount of the federal income taxes, the employee share of Social Security and Medicare taxes, and the employer share of Social Security and Medicare taxes equal to the amount of qualifying sick and child care leave that they paid, instead of depositing them with the IRS.

If there are not sufficient payroll taxes to cover the cost of qualified sick and child care leave paid, employers will be able file a request with the IRS for an accelerated payment. The IRS expects to process these requests in two weeks or less, with further guidance on this issue coming in the next two weeks.

Examples
1. An eligible employer pays $5,000 in sick leave and is otherwise required to deposit $8,000 in payroll taxes, including employee withholdings. The employer is entitled to use up to $5,000 of the $8,000 of taxes it was going to deposit for making qualified leave payments. The employer would only be required to deposit the remaining $3,000 with the IRS on its next regular deposit date.
2. An eligible employer pays $10,000 in sick leave and is required to deposit $8,000 in payroll taxes. The employer could use the entire $8,000 of taxes to make qualified leave payments and file a request for an accelerated credit for the remaining $2,000.

Small Business Exemption

Businesses with less than 50 employees will be eligible for an exemption from the leave requirements relating to school closings or child care unavailability, provided that the employer can show that compliance would jeopardize the ability of the business to continue. The DOL will be providing emergency guidance establishing simple and clear criteria defining the circumstances that will meet the criteria of jeopardy to the viability of an employer’s business as a going concern.

Non-Enforcement Period

The DOL will be issuing a temporary non-enforcement policy. Under the policy, the DOL will not enforce the Act until May 2, 2020 (30 days after its effective date), against employers that have acted reasonably and in good faith to comply.

I continue to monitor these issues in real-time and will be posting updates here as warranted. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me directly.

Posted on March 19, 2020June 29, 2023

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act is law

Capitol Building, joint session of Congress

Five days.

That’s all it took for both parties in both houses of Congress to work together, along with the White House and President Trump, to pass important relief legislation for American workers. We need more cooperation like this to see our country thru this crisis.

Last evening, President Trump signed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. Employers only have until April 2 to implement the law’s required 12 weeks (10 weeks paid) family leave for school- and childcare-related coronavirus absences, and 80 hours of paid coronavirus-related sick pay.

Employers are going to need policies, and procedures, and forms, and paid leave management tools and training. And it’s all going to be very new for the smallest of employers, whose resources are already stretched thin.

Time-off Tools: The Workforce platform simplifies managing staff time-off.

Is this law perfect? Not by a long shot. For starters, it doesn’t apply to the largest of employers who can afford to pay for this leave, and it offers little in the way of relief to the smallest of employers who can’t. It has other holes as well. It leaves too many employees unprotected and too many types of leave uncovered.

That said, it’s a start, and it’s more than I would have hoped for if you would asked me about it just one week ago.

Employers, here’s the thing. This law is a floor, not a ceiling. It is solely within your power to do right by your employees. Let them work remotely if possible. Pay them if and while you can if they are ill, or under quarantine, or with a child who can no longer attend school. If you have to lay employees off, let them collect their unused vacation and other paid time off (even if you have a policy that says otherwise or the law doesn’t require it). And seriously consider severance pay, or better, funding their COBRA payments for a period of time so they don’t lose needed health insurance, and do it without a release agreement.

I said this a few days ago, and it bears repeating again (and likely again, and again, and again). How we act over the next few months will define who we are as a nation and what we will look like when we come out on the other side. Please, think about this as you make decisions about your employees. We all have lots of difficult choices to make over the coming days, weeks, and months, but I am URGING compassion and flexibility if at all possible. What we do now will have a long-lasting effect on our country, whatever this country looks like when this crisis is over.

COVID-19 is rapidly changing how businesses operate. We recognize that organizations need an extra helping hand right now. So we’re offering our GPS clock in tool for free to new sign-ups over the coming months. Sign up today and our Workforce Success team will provide a personal, online walkthrough of our platform to help you get started. It can be fully deployed in 1-2 days.

Posted on March 16, 2020June 29, 2023

Answering the 6 most common questions about the Families First Coronavirus Response Act

COVID-19, coronavirus, public health crisis

In the past 48 hours, I’ve received a lot of emails and other correspondence asking questions about the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. Most of them fall into one of six categories.

1. I am a small business, and if I have to pay family and sick leave for my employees, I’ll go out of business. What am I supposed to do?

2. I work for a [large employer]. They don’t provide any paid time off. What am I supposed to do if I get sick, or a family member gets sick?

3. How does the interaction between the FFCRA’s paid family leave and paid sick leave work?

4. I understand the tax relief provision, but I operate a non-profit that doesn’t pay any taxes. What relief is there for us?

5. What about self-employed people? What relief is there for us?

6. If a business is forced to close because of COVID-19, what relief is there for its employees who lose their jobs, either temporarily or permanently?

Let me try to answer each as best as I can, understanding that there are no clear answers to any of this, and these issues are difficult and quickly developing and changing.
1. Small Businesses

COVID-19, coronavirus, public health crisisThere is no doubt that paid family and sick leave will impose a huge burden on the smallest of employers, especially since the only financial relief in the bill, the 100% tax credit for sick leave wages paid, is not a dollar-for-dollar match and only offers deferred relief.There is one provision in the bill, however, that may offer some help in the most extreme of circumstances.

The Secretary of Labor shall have the authority to issue regulations to exempt small businesses with fewer than 50 employees from the requirements of section 102(a)(1)(F) when the imposition of such requirements would jeopardize the viability of the business as a going concern.

This means that if the Secretary of Labor takes this up, he could issue regulations that would permit the smallest of businesses (under 50 employees) to claim an exemption if paid leave “would jeopardize the viability of the business as a going concern.”

Also note that under the same provisions, the Secretary of Labor could also pass regulations “to exclude certain health care providers and emergency responders,” meaning that these vital employees might not receive any paid FMLA or paid sick leave.

Stay tuned to see if this happens once this bill passes.

Finally, late last night, the Treasury Secretary announced that employers will be able to use cash deposited with the IRS to pay sick-leave wages, and for businesses without sufficient taxes from which to draw, the Treasury would make advances available.

2. Employees of Large Employers.

One of the most curious of the decisions this bill makes is to exempt employers with 500 or more employees. Here’s the editorial board of The New York Times, taking this decision to task.

Paying sick workers to stay at home is both good policy and good politics. Why not pass a bill that required all employers to provide paid sick leave and then force Republicans to explain their objections to the public?

The bill does require some employers to provide full-time workers with up to 10 days of paid leave. But the requirement does not apply to the nation’s largest employers — companies with 500 or more workers, who together employ roughly 54 percent of all workers.

All I can say is stay tuned. This coverage choice could be altered by the Senate when they take up this bill early this week, or it could be fixed by an entirely different piece of legislation. Or it can remain as-is, making the policy decision that large employers should offer these benefits without a government mandate. As the op-ed points out, according to federal statistics approximately 86 percent of employees at big companies already receive get some kind of paid sick leave. What I’d like to hear from Congress is why this 500-employee line was drawn? Was it a policy choice, the result of big-business lobbying, or with the knowledge that other legislation is on the way to close this loophole?

3. Paid FMLA vs. Paid Sick Leave.

There is a lot of uncertainly as to how the FFCRA’s paid-leave provisions interact with each other, but here’s my best read. The paid sick leave provision provides 80 hours of paid sick leave for full-time employees (or pro-rata for part-time employees) for COVID-19-related absences. The paid FMLA provision provides paid leave at two-thirds of an employee’s regular rate of pay for the number of hours the employee otherwise would have worked for the duration of a COVID-19-related FMLA leave, but the first 14 days of such leave can be unpaid. I’d expect most to substitute and run concurrently the paid sick leave during the initial unpaid portion of FMLA. Thus, the first 10 days of a COVID-19 leave will be paid at 100 percent of the employee’s regular rate as paid sick leave, and the remaining 10 weeks will be paid a two-thirds of an employee’s regular rate as paid FMLA. When an employer drafts or revises FMLA and paid sick leave policies, it should account for this overlap. Finally, please don’t forget about paid sick leave laws in your state or locality, which also might have something to add on this issue.

4. Non-profits.

I actually have some good news to share here. The tax credit offered by the FFCRA is against social security taxes, which, unless I misunderstand (and I’m not a tax lawyer), non-profits still pay on their employees. So, the tax credit provision will still off non-profit employers some future relief.

5. The self-employed.

This is, perhaps, the biggest issue. While the number varies wildly, there are anywhere between 50 million and 75 million gig workers. That’s a whole lot of self-employed people that this bill does not touch. What are they supposed to do? How are they supposed to earn if the economy shuts down? I wish I had the answer, but I have no idea. It’s a huge gap and huge problem, and absent specific government relief, these people are really going to be struggling, probably for a long time. That said, the tax-relief provisions also seem to apply to the self-employed. So that’s something.

6. Closures.

If a company is forced to shut its doors because of COVID-19, the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act might apply if your business is large enough. It applies to employers with 100 or more employees. It mandates 60 days’ advance written notice (or if no notice is given or can be given, 60 days’ pay in lieu of such notice) before a “plant closing” or “mass layoff.” Please note, though, that a mass layoff does not occur, and therefore WARN does not apply, if the layoff is expected to be for less than six months. Because most expect this crisis to subside in less than six months, WARN likely will not apply to coronavirus-related layoffs. It will still apply to a plant closure if your business is large enough to meet the 100-employee threshold.

Also, keep in mind that some states have their own mini-WARN laws (California, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, and Wisconsin, for example) that provide greater coverage. Ohio does not.

Finally, state unemployment compensation is available to employees who suffer coronavirus-related job losses. Ohio, for example, Governor DeWine is issuing an executive order so that unemployment insurance immediately covers workers who are displaced, even temporarily, by coronavirus, which will include a waiver any waiting periods to qualify and of the requirement that an individual seek work to collect benefits.

These issues are quickly evolving. I’m doing my best to stay on top of them and get everyone information as quickly as I can. Stay tuned. It’s going to a difficult time for everyone between now and when this crisis ends.

If your business needs FMLA or sick leave policies drafted, reviewed, or revised for anticipated FFCRA compliance, please let me know.

Also read: COVID-19 the role of businesses in a public health crisis? 

Posted on March 9, 2020June 29, 2023

FMLA obligations during the coronavirus outbreak

COVID-19, coronavirus, public health crisis

Jon Hymam, The Practical Employer employment law blog

COVID-19 is rapidly changing how businesses operate. We recognize that organizations need an extra helping hand right now. So we’re offering our platform for free to new sign-ups over the coming months. Sign up today and our Workforce Success team will gladly provide a personal, online walkthrough of our platform to help you get started.

Among other qualifying reasons, the FMLA allows an eligible employee to take 12 weeks of annual unpaid leave to care for a family member with a serious health condition. Family member, however, does not mean any family member. It only applies to an employee’s spouse, son, daughter, or parent.

The FMLA’s definition of “son or daughter” not only includes a biological or adopted child, but also a child of a person standing “in loco parentis” (one who has day-to-day responsibility for caring for a child without a biological or legal relationship to that child).

Suppose, however, an employee’s family member contracts COVID-19. Is that employee entitled to FMLA leave to care for that family member’s minor children during the period of incapacity? According to Brede v. Apple Computer (N.D. Ohio 1/23/2020), the answer is “no.”

Brede, a full-time member of Apple’s Genius Team at one of its Apple Stores, claimed that Apple fired him because he sought FMLA leave as in loco parentis to care for his niece and nephew because of his sister’s serious health condition. According to the court, Brede’s leave was not FMLA-covered.

The flaw in Brede’s FMLA claims on both theories is that … his requested leave to care for those children was not FMLA-qualifying. Brede does not allege that any of the minor children (who would be considered his daughter and sons under in loco parentis) are experiencing a “serious health condition” that requires his care. It is Brede’s sister that has the serious health condition. Even if Brede’s care of the children could be seen, by extension, as care for his sick sister (and Brede cites no legal authority for that proposition), the FMLA does not entitle an employee to take leave to care for a sibling with a serious health condition.

The Brede court got this issue 100% legally correct. Because the FMLA does not provide leave to care for siblings, it also does not provide leave to care for an ill sibling’s children.

In this time international medical crisis, however, let’s not lose sight of the fact that the FMLA is a floor, not a ceiling. Just because the law doesn’t require you to grant a leave of absence to an employee to care for the children of an ill sibling doesn’t mean that you can’t choose to offer such leave. As COVID-19 cases spread, employers are going to have to be nimble and flexible in their responses. The hypothetical spun from the Brede case is but one example of this necessary flexibility.
Also read: Is coronavirus the thing that will finally make paid sick leave a national reality?
Also read: COVID-19 and the role of businesses in a public health crisis
Posted on March 5, 2020June 29, 2023

Not every mistake amounts to actionable employment discrimination

employment law, labor law, overtime records

Mistakes happen. Including in the context of employment decisions. But not every mistake amounts to actionable employment discrimination. That’s the lesson of this case, where Robyn Smith’s employer fired her after it wrongly concluded that she had been stealing from one of the company’s clients.

So starts the 6th Circuit’s opinion in Smith v. Towne Properties Asset Management Co.

The Practical Employer, employment law blogRobyn Smith worked as a community manager for apartment complexes. As part of her compensation, she lived rent-free on site.

Several years into her employment, Smith developed pseudotumor cerebri — a condition caused by spinal fluid pressure on the brain — the symptoms of which include migraines, blurred vision, vertigo, and short-term memory loss. She took several leaves of absence under the FMLA, all without incident.

Thereafter, a co-worker complained to management that Smith had been embezzling money by coding her gas and electric bills to vacant apartments. Following an investigation, Towne Properties fired her.

As it turned out, prior ownership had permitted Smith to have free utilities, a fact that no one had bothered to disclose to new ownership. Even after discovering its mistake, however, the company refused to reconsider its termination decision.

The appellate court concluded that the district court had properly dismissed Smith’s discrimination lawsuit. Why? Because, even though the employer’s reason for firing her turned out to be incorrect, it had an honest belief about it when it reached its decision.

To win on her claim, Smith must show (among other things) that Towne’s explanation for firing her was pretext for disability discrimination. In other words, that the neutral explanation is simply cover for a discriminatory motive. Smith can’t show a trialworthy dispute about pretext if Towne honestly believed that she was misappropriating utilities even if that belief turned out to be mistaken.

The court relied on the company’s investigation, including interviews of witnesses and review of documents, to conclude that “Towne made an informed decision based on specific facts.”

The “honest belief rule” is one of the most effective shields available to employers in discrimination cases. As long as the employer has an “honest belief” in its proffered nondiscriminatory reason for discharging an employee, the employee cannot establish that the reason was pretextual simply because, in reality, it is incorrect.

Yet, if you want to be able to argue that your honest belief justifies your decision, you must be able to support your claim. Contemporaneously-made documentation, coupled with corroborating evidence developed in a thorough investigation, is best. Courts are loath to second-guess employers’ business judgment, but will not hesitate if it appears an employer slacked in its investigatory responsibilities. Smith v. Towne Properties Asset Management is a good roadmap for employers to follow in claiming the protections of this rule, in the event a decision later turns out to be mistaken.

Posted on March 4, 2020June 29, 2023

What “Sexy Vixen Vinyl” teaches us about porn at work

fox news, porn at work

If you’re Fox News reporter Brit Hume, you have a lot of explaining to do. Yesterday, the venerable journalist carelessly tweeted out his internet exploration of “Sexy Vixen Vinyl.”

fox news, porn at work

Some would say Hume made an innocent mistake. Trying to share a story on updated election odds, he tweeted a photo of his screen forgetting about his list of open tabs. I’d say that the fact that he was looking at “Sexy Vixen Vinyl” at work eliminates any innocence in this mistake. That website simply has no place in the workplace, period.

That said, I can guarantee that Brit Hume is not the first employee in history to surf over to “Sexy Vixen Vinyl” on a work computer. This is as good a time as any, therefore, to review your “workplace pornography” policy. While you might not have this policy per se, you should have an “internet use” policy, which should address each of the following—

1. What does your internet-use policy say, does it include prohibitions against pornography, and does it sufficiently and clearly explain that violations will result in discipline, up to and including termination?

2. Do you block websites that might include adult material, or do you trust employees to their own devices? Keep in mind that if you opt for the latter, many adult websites are rife with malware, viruses, and other things that you likely don’t want on work equipment. Also keep in mind that if you opt for the former, you may need to provide for work-related exceptions (like an employment lawyer researching a case, and I speak from experience).

3. If you are overly concerned that your workplace is rife with porn, you could opt for a porn audit, examining all of your technology assets for inappropriate material.

4. Once you become aware of any pornography in the workplace, your obligation as an employer kicks in to promptly investigate and implement reasonable corrective action. Failure to act could subject you to a nasty and expensive sexual harassment lawsuit.

5. Finally, if your investigation leads you to believe that the pornography involves illegal activity (e.g., children), immediately stop and call your lawyer, as this is a serious issue that needs serious treatment.

Also read: What you can learn from the law firm partner suspended for watching porn at work

Also read: Could your company be liable for child-porn viewing?

Posted on March 3, 2020June 29, 2023

Can an employer require an employee with a serious health condition to take FMLA leave?

COVID-19, coronavirus, public health crisis

Yesterday, in response to my post about coronavirus and paid sick leave, a commenter on LinkedIn asked whether an employer can force a sick employee to take FMLA leave.

The answer is a qualified “yes.”

Conventional FMLA wisdom had always been that if an eligible employee gave notice of a need for an FMLA-qualifying leave, the employer was required to designate the time off as FMLA. That wisdom changed, however, with the 9th Circuit’s 2014 decision in Escriba v. Foster Poultry Farms. Escriba held that the FMLA permits an employee to decline to take FMLA leave, even when the need is for an FMLA-qualified reason. No other circuit has followed Escriba (although the Northern District of Ohio did in 2015). Last year the Department of Labor published an opinion letter [pdf] that expressly rejected Escriba, restating the historically prevailing view that an employer cannot delay designating qualifying leave as FMLA leave, even if an employee asks it to do so.

COVID-19, coronavirus, public health crisisPractically speaking, the denial of an FMLA-qualifying leave as FMLA-designed leave might be a no-harm/no-foul, as long as the employee does not lose any other rights in the process. If the employer permits the employee to take the leave as unpaid, restores the employee to the same or substantially similar job at the end of the unpaid leave, otherwise treats the employee as if they were on an FMLA leave, and does not retaliate against the employee, a refusal to designate qualifying leave as FMLA leave should not cause any legal issues. It’s no different than having a leave policy more generous than what the FMLA requires … it just grants extra leave on the front end instead of the back end.

Also read: COVID-19 and the role of businesses in a public health crisis

Posted on February 27, 2020June 29, 2023

DO NOT use social media to determine applicants’ race and gender

Person on laptop

Almost as long as social media has existed, employers have searched social media to dig up dirt on prospective employees. There is nothing illegal about these searches … provided you don’t use the information unlawfully. For example, to discriminate on the basis of a protected class.

If Lisa McCarrick, a former Amazon manager, wins her lawsuit against the online retailer, Amazon is going to learn this lesson the hard way.

According to NBC News, McCarrick claims that Amazon fired her after she complained to her supervisor about being made to scour the social media accounts of applicants to determine their race and gender.

McCarrick joined Amazon as a loss prevention manager in July 2018 and was promoted to a regional manager five months later, the suit says.

After her promotion, her supervisor instructed McCarrick to go through the social media profiles of job candidates “for the purpose of ascertaining race/ethnicity and gender,” according to the lawsuit.

In September, she submitted a written complaint raising her concerns about being told to scour applicants’ social media accounts…. Two months later, in November, she was called into a meeting with human resources and the director of loss prevention informing her that she was fired.

I am not going to begin to suggest that employers refrain from searching publicly available information on social media to help screen candidates. Social media can provide a treasure trove of information that could disqualify someone from employment. Wouldn’t you want to know, for example, if a prospective employee trashed a former employer, or shared a former employer’s confidential information, or posted racist comments?

What you cannot do, however, is use social media to screen candidates on the basis of race, gender, or any other protected class. This should be common sense, right? Right?

Also read: NBC reignites privacy debate by requiring job seekers’ social media passwords 
Also read: Requiring social media passwords from candidates is a bad idea

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 … Page 16 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress