Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Benefits

Posted on April 21, 2011August 9, 2018

Most Employers Say They Plan to Alter Retiree Drug Plans

Employers that will lose a tax break for offering prescription drug coverage to Medicare-eligible retirees are considering a variety of design changes, according to a survey released April 21.


Under a provision in the health care reform law, employers with prescription drug plans provided to Medicare-eligible retirees in 2013 no longer will be able to receive a tax deduction equal to the amount of the tax-free federal subsidy they receive for prescription drug expenses.


Under a 2003 law that added a prescription drug benefit to the Medicare program, employers that have provided coverage at least equal to Medicare Part D receive a tax-free subsidy equal to 28 percent of medication costs within a certain range incurred by Medicare-eligible retirees.


In a survey of 344 employers, Lincolnshire, Illinois-based Aon Hewitt Inc. found that 75 percent now receive the prescription drug subsidy. Of those receiving the subsidy, 73 percent will alter their retiree drug benefits strategy as a result of the elimination of the tax break.


Among designs favored by employers that are considering changes are directly contracting with a Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, which 34 percent of respondents are considering.


Thirty percent of employers are considering a defined contribution approach in which retirees would receive a fixed contribution and use it to buy drug coverage in the individual Medicare market and 9 percent anticipate eliminating coverage.


Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.


 


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on April 20, 2011August 9, 2018

United Bumps Retiree Travel Perk to Back of Line

United Airlines retirees will take a back seat to current employees under a new policy on travel privileges at United Continental Holdings Inc.


The decision, announced late last month, is angering United retirees, who previously had priority over current employees when flying standby on otherwise empty seats.


The new policy, which takes effect Jan. 1, gives all current and retired workers of the Chicago-based airline eight vacation passes a year that guarantee both priority when flying standby. Once those passes are used up, however, current employees get priority over retirees.


The policy is similar to Continental’s rules before the airline merged with United. Under United’s old plan, retirees with more than 25 years of service had top priority when it came to flying standby on unused seats.


Flight privileges are among the most cherished perks for airline employees and retirees, especially in the case of United, which slashed its pension program in bankruptcy.


More than 3,600 people have signed an online petition objecting to the change. Among the comments by hundreds of retirees: “This is unbelievable. I worked years giving back my pay and then years with no pay raise at all. My medical is ridiculous. … My pension was destroyed. All we have left are our travel benefits and now we are supposed to accept this package. United has never gotten the concept of treating their employees well.”


As the company merges the two airlines, it has to choose common policies for a host of benefits.


“We went through a careful and thoughtful process to align the travel benefit programs of our two companies,” United said in a written statement. “This program recognizes the hard work of both active employees and retirees, and provides meaningful travel privileges that are competitive with the industry.”


As with the paying public, the travel experience for employees is determined by status.


While all employees and retirees technically have the privilege to fly in unused coach seats whenever they’re available, the reality is the seats are limited.


The new policy of eight vacation passes is an improvement for Continental retirees, who previously didn’t get priority boarding privileges. Those were reserved for current employees.


But Continental executives aren’t likely to be happy with the new rules, either.


Continental’s old policy gave priority to management over rank-and-file. The new policy doesn’t distinguish between managers and line workers.  


Filed by John Pletz of Crain’s Chicago Business, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


 


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on April 1, 2011August 9, 2018

Fidelity Says Health Care Reform Law Cuts Retirees Costs

A 65-year-old couple retiring in 2011 without employer-provided retiree health insurance will need about $230,000 to pay future medical-related expenses, Fidelity Investments said in an analysis.


That’s down 8 percent from last year’s estimate of $250,000 and is the first annual decrease in the 10 years Fidelity has been making the projections.


The $20,000 decline in the estimate from last year was driven by provisions in last year’s health care reform law that expanded Medicare coverage of brand name prescription drugs once retirees’ drug costs hit a certain level.


While the savings produced by the health reform law are “a welcome relief to many seniors, it should be considered a one-time adjustment, at least for the time being,” Fidelity Executive vice president Brad Kimler in Boston said in a written statement.


Of the $230,000 needed to cover a retired couple’s health care expenses, Fidelity estimates 31 percent will go toward paying Medicare Part B and Part D premiums; 45 percent will be consumed by expenses not covered by Medicare, such as coinsurance and deductibles imposed by Medicare; and 24 percent for out-of-pocket prescription drug expenses.


A summary of the analysis, which was released March 31, is available at fidelity.com/inside-fidelity/individual-investing/2011-rhcce.  


Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.


 


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on April 1, 2011August 9, 2018

CMS to Stop Accepting Early Retiree Reimbursement Applications

The Early Retiree Reinsurance Program, or ERRP, will stop accepting applications after May 5 as the $5 billion program’s funds are being depleted rapidly, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said.


The program, created by the health reform law, partially reimburses employers and other organizations that have early retiree health care plans.


“We have projected the availability of program funding based on the rate at which appropriated funds are currently being used to reimburse plan sponsors, and we have concluded that we have approved a sufficient number of applications to exhaust the program funding,” the CMS said in a March 31 filing that is to be published in the April 5 Federal Register.


As of March 17, the CMS had approved applications submitted by nearly 5,400 plan sponsors and paid about $1.8 billion in reimbursements to about 1,300 plan sponsors.
Of the $1.8 billion distributed, $206.8 million, or more than 10 percent, was distributed to the United Auto Workers Retiree Medical Benefits Trust.


The trust is a voluntary employees’ beneficiary association, which was set up by the UAW under a 2007 collective bargaining agreement between General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co., Chrysler and the UAW.


Under that agreement, the automakers agreed to contribute more than $50 billion to the Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association plan. In return, the automakers no longer have to provide health care benefits to UAW-represented retirees and their dependents. The UAW is responsible for managing the VEBA and paying retiree health care claims.


Other big recipients of ERRP funds include:
• AT&T Inc., $140 million
• Verizon Communications Inc., $91.7 million
• Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio, $70.6 million
• Teacher Retirement System of Texas, $68.1 million
• Georgia Department of Community Health, $57.9 million
• California Public Employees’ Retirement System, $57.8 million
• State of New York, $47.9 million
• State of New Jersey Treasury Department, Pension Accounting Services Department, $38.6 million
• General Electric Co., $36.6 million
• Employees Retirement System of Texas, $30.2 million
• The commonwealth of Kentucky, $29.7 million.
Under the ERRP, the federal government reimburses plan sponsors for a portion of claims incurred starting June 1, 2010, by retirees who are at least age 55 but not eligible for Medicare, as well as covered dependents, regardless of age.
After a participant incurs $15,000 in health care claims in a plan year, the government will reimburse 80 percent of claims up to $90,000.  


Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


 


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on March 11, 2011August 9, 2018

Employers Undecided on Health Plan Future After 2014

Most employers have yet to decide whether they will continue to offer health care coverage in 2014 when the “play-or-pay” provision of the health reform law goes into effect, the head of a benefits brokerage and consulting firm said March 10.


At the moment, clients are sitting on the fence, J. Michael Brewer, president of Kansas City, Missouri-based Lockton Benefit Group, told a House Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions Subcommittee hearing.


“The majority of our clients tell us they will wait and see. What they will do in 2014 depends on their health insurance costs and budget in 2014 and their perceived need to use a health plan to gain a competitive advantage for labor,” Brewer said.


Clients are saying, “We won’t be the first to drop coverage, but we won’t wait to be third either,” he said.


Starting in 2014, employers with at least 50 employees who drop coverage will pay an annual assessment of $2,000 per full-time employee, excluding the first 30 employees.


Individuals who make as much as 400 percent of the federal poverty level ($89,400 for a family of four) will be eligible for federal premium subsidies for policies they purchase from insurers offering coverage through exchanges that states are required to set up by 2014.


That $2,000 penalty is a fraction of what employers pay for coverage. Lockton calculates if employers were to terminate group coverage, they would save an amount equal to 44 percent of their projected 2014 health insurance costs on average. But that percentage excludes any extra money employers decide to provide to employees to help offset the cost of coverage they would purchase through state exchanges.


Brewer predicted that smaller employers will be the first to abandon coverage. At a recent Lockton presentation to about 200 employers with workforces ranging from 50 to 150 employees, half said they intend to exit the group health care market in 2014, he said.


The hearing was called to examine how the health care law has affected costs.  


Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


 


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on March 2, 2011August 9, 2018

Agency Eyes Revamp of All California Employee Pension Programs

A California commission has recommended a complete revamp of pension programs covering the state’s employees, citing their “crushing” costs to the state and taxpayers.


The Little Hoover Commission, a bipartisan and independent state agency, in late February proposed a new pension model offering a lower-cost—compared with plans now offered—defined benefit plan in conjunction with a 401(k)-style plan in which the state would match employee contributions up to a certain percentage of pay.


Such an arrangement has been in place for federal employees hired since the late 1980s.
The commission also recommended a cap of $80,000 to $90,000 in the amount of salary that can be used to calculate an employee’s pension benefit, a ban on retroactive benefit increases, and setting benefit eligibility ages that do not encourage early retirement.


“The stakes are too high to continue making temporary changes at the margin,” the commission stated.  


Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


 


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on March 1, 2011August 9, 2018

Auto Company’s Pension Plans Funding Level Improves

The funded levels of General Motors Co.’s U.S. pension plans improved significantly in 2010, aided by strong investment returns and a $4 billion cash contribution.

At year-end 2010, the plans were underfunded by $11.5 billion, a sharp improvement from year-end 2009, when the plans had $16.2 billion in unfunded liabilities, GM disclosed Feb. 24 in reporting its fourth quarter and 2010 financial results.

In addition, the plans were 89 percent funded at end of last year, up from 84 percent a year earlier.

The results exclude $2 billion in company stock that GM contributed to the plans last month.    

Filed by Jerry Geisel of Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.

 

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on February 14, 2011August 9, 2018

Report Highlights Continued Decline in Defined Benefit Plans

Only 49 percent of 200 of the largest U.S. companies had ongoing defined benefit plans in 2009, down from 61 percent in 2006, according to Mercer’s Retirement, Risk and Finance Perspective.


Released Feb. 10, trends also show an increase in defined benefit plan curtailments among companies.


Some 11 percent had plans frozen to all employees as of 2009, up from 5 percent in 2006; 11 percent also had plans frozen to new employees, up from 7 percent; and 3 percent had plans frozen to some employees, down from 4 percent.


An increasing share of the companies, 26 percent, offered no defined benefit plan as of 2009, up from 23 percent in 2006.


Freezing a “plan does little to mitigate the underlying [pension funding] volatility,” Steve Alpert, principal and senior consulting actuary, and David Weissner, partner and senior consulting actuary, wrote in the perspective report. The attitude that “ ‘everyone else is doing it, so it must be a good idea’ has permeated boardroom thinking, replacing many facts with impressions.”


Plan executives “are starting to realize that it’s not the plan design that drives [pension plan funding] volatility, but the deliberate risk-seeking behavior that results in mismatching of assets to liabilities,” they wrote.


“By implementing thoughtful risk reduction strategies with immediate changes in investments, or through a dynamic derisking strategy, pension plan sponsors may be able to reduce cost volatility with less drastic changes in plan design.”


Among other data, the perspective report said in 401(k) plans, participants on average have been contributing less during the recession.


The average contribution rate as a percentage of pay was 6.8 percent as of March 31, a nearly steady fall each quarter since Dec. 31, 2007, when the rate was 7.46 percent.  


Filed by Barry B. Burr of Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


 


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on February 14, 2011August 9, 2018

Companies Search for Savings on Health Bills

C ommunication, creativity and a willingness to venture into new territory will play a critical role in employers’ efforts to reduce health care costs in 2011.


Employers such as Radnor, Pennsylvania-based VWR International, a global distribution company of 6,500 workers, are taking proactive steps to combat a forecast of an 8.8 percent spike in health care costs—the highest increase in five years, according to a 2010 study by Aon Hewitt.


Director of benefits Laureen Quinter says the firm’s strategy is to focus on wellness and prevention instead of cost containment and plan design.


“We did increase the copay on brand-name prescription drugs and changed the fees for emergency room services to minimize inappropriate use but didn’t alter our deductibles, other copays or coinsurance,” she says.


Instead, Quinter launched a wellness campaign last fall, holding employee meetings to explain the cost-savings incentives that VWR is offering. Workers who complete a health assessment and undergo biometric screenings (blood pressure, body mass index and a cholesterol check) can cut $10 off their monthly health insurance premium, and it doubles if their spouse participates.


Additional savings are realized if the employee’s tests indicate good health. Going forward, workers can receive credits for improving upon the prior year’s results.


“Our goal is to identify health conditions before they become a problem,” Quinter says. “We are helping them to become better consumers of health care by giving them the tools and information they need to make informed decisions.”


Quinter’s team, including a dedicated wellness and education manager, is committed to integrating good health into the corporate culture and developing Web-based education components that will roll out later this year.


Wes Dyck, director of personnel for Washington-based conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, says his organization, which self-funds its plans, increased the office visit copayment from $20 to $25, raised its out-of-pocket maximum and boosted the monthly premium to bring a forecasted 24 percent increase down to 17 percent.


“With the new law, we can’t do some of the things we normally do to encourage efficient use of our health care dollars,” Dyck says of the organization, which employs 250 people.


At Cincinnati-based TCI, a full-service billing company with 100 employees, biannual educational sessions regarding its consumer-driven health plan and health savings accounts are complemented with cost-saving successes of employees shared by e-mail and word of mouth.


“Employees need to fully understand how these plans can reduce the cost of health care to both the employee and the employer,” says president Jeffrey Rinear. “Our employees are engaged in the idea of being wise health care consumers and understand the tax benefits and saving component of HSAs.”


Mike Barrett, president of BBG, Inc. a Valley City, Ohio, benefits administrator, says he believes it’s cost effective for clients to use high-deductible plans and fund the difference between the previous and now higher deductible, or self-fund portions of their plans. For example, he explains that an employer might pay $200,000 a year in premiums for a “fully loaded” plan but can fund a high-deductible plan for half that cost.


“Even if they fund the deductible gap for employees, they can still save 20 percent,” he notes.


Barrett Benefits Group encourages employers to offer a wellness component as part of their plan and to work with local physicians to sponsor on-site screenings. He says many physicians will provide an aggregate report that protects confidentiality but indicates the well-being of the workforce.


One of Barrett’s clients is Valley City-based Webb-Stiles Co., a conveyor systems manufacturer. The company discovered it was far more cost effective to purchase a high-deductible health plan and carve out the prescription drug plan. Webb-Stiles controller Jeff Twardzik developed a relationship with a local pharmacy willing to provide customized services to employees, who are charged a minimal $3, $5, or $10 copayment, which means the company pays most of the cost.


“We are helping the local economy, our employees are saving money, we’re saving money by self-funding one of the most costly pieces of our plan, and I’m getting great feedback,” he says.


Pete Villemain, president of Employee Benefit Services in San Antonio, says the self-funding of plans is gaining popularity.


“My philosophy is that if you are willing to invest five years in a self-funded option, then I believe you will save money,” Villemain says. “Once you have more than 60 employees, you should look into it because you gain control and flexibility over your plan design.”


Villemain adds that consumerism is important with health care plans that cover catastrophic needs while leaving the insured to manage the day-to-day costs.


Rusty Rice, Texas Association of Health Underwriters’ immediate past-president, agrees.


“We have moved full circle from the traditional indemnity plans that covered 80 percent of costs to HMOs that were practically free…and people stopped taking an interest in their personal health, which resulted in higher costs,” Rice says. “We must put more responsibility on the employee or health care costs will continue to spiral.”


Workforce Management Online, February 2011 — Register Now!

Posted on February 4, 2011August 9, 2018

Significant Attention Paid to Significant Others in Need

Whenever the economy tumbles, managers at Bon Secours Virginia Health System know some of their employees will be in for a rough time. While the health care industry typically weathers a downturn quite well, employees’ spouses who work in other fields often wind up unemployed.


At such times, Bon Secours is prepared to provide employees with flexible schedules to help meet their financial needs. A part-time worker might request full-time employment for a while or ask to increase part-time hours to qualify for benefits, says Jim Godwin, vice president of human resources.


Bon Secours has found that permitting employees to modify their schedules reduces their anxiety and stress. “They just work better because they’re not distracted as much” by financial worries and they don’t skip work to deal with personal problems, Godwin says. That’s especially important in a health care setting where patient care is paramount.


Smart employers are realizing that even if their workers still have jobs, the impact of an unemployed or underemployed spouse, partner or other family member can be profound. Possible problems include financial strain, marital strife, extreme stress, absenteeism, reduced productivity, and alcohol or drug abuse.


To help ease the pain, some employers provide special classes to assist the unemployed spouse in a job search, such as the Bon Secours workshop titled Putting the Pieces Together for employees’ family members. Other companies offer monetary grants or encourage use of their employee assistance programs.


“Many companies are very clearly aware that as the employee goes, so goes the company,” says Ian Shaffer, chief medical officer at Managed Health Network Inc., a San Rafael, California, company that offers employee assistance and other corporate wellness programs. “Anything they can do that will enhance the health and wellness of their employees comes back to them many fold over.”


Wanda Henderson, a part-time teacher’s assistant at the Bon Secours’ child care facility in Midlothian, Virginia, can attest to that. Her husband, Ricardo, lost his job of 22 years at a factory when it shut down two years ago. Since then, he has bounced around through a string of temporary jobs that seemed to be leading to full-time employment but never panned out in the end. “It was kind of depressing,” she says.


But rather than letting it drag her down, Henderson threw herself into her work to help keep busy. She also brought in additional pay, as well as benefits, by spending about six months working extra hours in the dietary department of Bon Secours. “We just had to do what we had to do to meet our needs at the end of the month,” she says. “We’re not people who sit around and collect unemployment.”


Her husband now has both a full-time and a part-time job, so Henderson has gone back to working 27 hours a week. “I was very grateful to the Bon Secours family” for those extra work hours, she says. “They’re very understanding if you get into a situation.”


At the Rock Bottom restaurant and brewery chain, the HOPE Fund, which stands for Helping Our People in Emergencies, makes small grants available to “any restaurant employee who has come upon hard times and it impacts their financial situation,” says Angie Leach, community relations manager for the company’s foundation. The funds for the foundation come from employee payroll deductions.


A recent grant went to a cook in one of the company’s Portland, Oregon, restaurants. His wife had been out of work for six months, and the couple couldn’t pay their rent or utilities. The employee had to fill out an application and submit backup documentation to apply for the funds.


His name was then deleted from the application, which was sent to a team of company employees who award the grants. “You could clearly see the poor guy was in a hard situation,” Leach says. He was awarded about $800.


The company has found that offering support in such situations helps boost productivity and foster employee retention. “An integral part of having a successful business is taking care of our own in times of crisis,” Leach says.


Workforce Management, January 2011, p. 6 — Subscribe Now!

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 … Page 63 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress