Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Commentary & Opinion

Posted on January 21, 2010August 31, 2018

Labor Department Plans Free COBRA Extension Webcast

The Department of Labor will hold a free online webcast Friday, January 22, regarding the new requirements of the federal COBRA subsidy.


The two-hour webcast begins at 1 p.m. EST and includes officials from the Labor Department, the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. They are scheduled to discuss the new extension and notice requirements.


“If you are an employer trying to comply with federal COBRA regarding your health plan, or if you are a third-party administrator or a carrier with questions about the new law, this is your chance to hear from the federal regulators and have the opportunity to ask them questions,” said a Labor Department press release.


Late last year, Congress extended the COBRA premium eligibility period until February 28 and increased the maximum period for receiving the subsidy from nine months to 15 months. Eligible individuals pay 35 percent of their COBRA premiums, while the remaining 65 percent is repaid to the employer through a tax credit.


—Rick Bell 



Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.



 

Posted on January 19, 2010August 31, 2018

Dear Workforce How Do We Improve Our Recruitment of Topnotch Nurses?

Dear Getting Ready for the Rebound:

As you have discovered through trial and error, many people no longer turn to the newspaper to find a job.

There are some high-tech “want ad” replacements, but in today’s market, leveraging the relationships of nurses already on board is probably the best way to find new talent.

First, let’s talk briefly about online job posting. You mention you have avoided large job boards because they are expensive, but there are several popular online venues where job posting is free. These include LinkedIn, Craigslist and some alumni sites. You might want to experiment with these and see if a posting attracts quality candidates.

Another electronic recruiting option is your own Web site. Job seekers today are doing targeted job hunts. It is not unusual for candidates to research many companies and then focus all their efforts on a chosen few. If you improve your Web site to clearly show why you are a great employer and let job seekers know that you are hiring, this can yield good talent.

The most effective recruiting doesn’t involve technology at all. Experienced hiring professionals believe that networking remains the most effective approach. That means you should ask all the nurses who work with you to recommend their friends, former colleagues and mentors.

One successful way to engage your existing staff is to build a referral incentive program. Many companies offer a small cash bonus to any employee who recommends an individual who gets hired. You could also hold an open house or host a series of presentations on topics of interest to nurses and ask your current team to bring their friends and former co-workers.

Last, it makes sense to ask the nurses you employ already where they would look if they were going to find a candidate (or search for a job). This will help you spot recruiting methods and sources you have not identified.

SOURCE: Ellen Raim, vice president of human resources, Cascade Microtech, Beaverton, Oregon

LEARN MORE:Solutions and strategies for recruiting minority nurses
The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on January 19, 2010August 31, 2018

Dear Workforce What Is the Best Way to Devise a Template for Workforce Planning?

Dear Stumped:

Before we get to the specific questions, let’s identify what a workforce plan actually does to ensure your organization has the right workers with the right skills at the right time.

A thorough workforce plan:

• Translates organization strategy into human capital needs.

• Analyzes demographics, current and projected staffing levels, current and projected skill mix, turnover trends, retirement risk and assumed growth.

• Assesses available workforce supply and demand in the markets where the organization needs talent.

• Identifies short- and long-term risks in attracting and retaining critical talent.

• Recommends recruiting and retention programs to close the risk gap and protect intellectual capital.

• Prioritizes programs/solutions by their return on investment.

Each of these discrete action elements also can be thought of as a different phase of a workforce plan. Each phase answers a unique set of questions or issues.

Phase I: Translate organization strategy into human capital needs
Key questions include:
1. What is your organization’s vision, its mission and its short- and long-term strategy?
2. What does this strategy tell you about what the organization needs from its current and future workforce?
3. What competencies will be most critical in the future for your growth? For servicing your customers? For continuing to innovate?

Phase II: Analyze demographics and trends
Key questions include:
1. What are your current and projected staffing trends (especially in key positions and roles)?
2. What are the projected turnover and retirement trends?
3. What gaps do you see as a result of this analysis?

Phase III: Assess available workforce supply and demand in the markets where you need talent
Key questions include:
1. On the supply side, how would you describe the labor pool, lifestyle shifts and the economic and regulatory environment?
2. On the demand side, what are the organization’s requirements, internal demographics and the “employment deal” being offered?
3. What does the optimal workforce model look like?

Phase IV: Identify short- and long-term risks in attracting and retaining critical talent
Key questions include:
1. What are the short- and long-term costs and benefits of attracting the talent required?
2. What are the short- and long-term costs and benefits of retaining the talent required?
3. What risks are posed by attracting or not attracting the talent needed?
4. What risks are posed by retaining or not retaining the talent needed?

Phase V: Recommend recruiting and retention programs to close the risk gap and protect intellectual capital
Key questions include:
1. What elements from “best practice” recruiting and retention programs can you apply?
2. What programs will give you the best return for the cost?
3. What will close the gaps in the least amount of time?

Phase VI: Prioritize programs/solutions by ROI
Key questions include:
1. What are the total costs and investment return for each option identified?
2. What change management issues are associated with each solution?

SOURCE: Richard Greenberg, president, The BreakThru Alliance, Marina del Rey, California, December 16, 2009

LEARN MORE: Workforce planning helps your organization ensure that its talent is equipped to drive performance. It is an issue that assumes greater importance in an uncertain world.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on January 13, 2010August 31, 2018

Chrysler Rushes to Hire as It Refills Product Pipeline

Chrysler Group has hired at least 600 engineers—and will hire more—to refill the product pipeline emptied during the last three years of corporate turmoil and bankruptcy.


“I need bodies to make these cars,” Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne said at the Detroit Auto Show on Monday, January 11.


Chrysler has already hired 400 engineers in engineering design and an additional 200 in quality, Chrysler executives said. The new hires are a mix of company and contract employees.


The engineers will primarily adapt Fiat platforms to vehicles that will sell under the Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep and Ram brands in North America starting in 2012. 



Filed by Bradford Wernle of Automotive News, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.



 

Posted on January 12, 2010August 31, 2018

U.S. Chamber Chief Warns Against Attaching EFCA to Jobs Bill

While organized labor pushes for action early this year on a bill that would make it easier for workers to form a union, a major business organization is warning Congress not to attach it to jobs legislation.


As soon as the House and Senate settle on a final health care reform bill and send it to President Barack Obama—a process that could take until February—the next item on the legislative agenda could be a measure designed to put people back to work and strengthen the safety net for those who have been laid off.


In December, the House approved a $154 billion bill that would redirect money from a program to stabilize the financial industry and allocate it for infrastructure projects and the extension of unemployment and health insurance subsidies.


Speculation has started in Washington that when the Senate takes up a similar measure, it will attach the Employee Free Choice Act—a bill that would allow the creation of a union when a majority of workers sign cards authorizing one.


“It would be a bad idea to put a card-check bill on a jobs bill—the yin and the yang,” said Thomas Donohue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, at a press briefing Tuesday, January 12. “And, yes, we would oppose it.”


Labor and business advocates have been battling over EFCA for the last year. Unions assert that as more workers organize, they will increase their leverage to secure higher wages and benefits. Currently, 7 percent of private sector is unionized.


Business groups like the Chamber of Commerce argue that EFCA would raise labor costs and reduce workplace flexibility at the worst time—while businesses are struggling to come out of the recession.


The bill was introduced in March but has been stalled as supporters try to bring enough moderate Senate Democrats on board to overcome a Republican filibuster.


In a speech at the National Press Club in Washington on Monday, January 11, AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka predicted that EFCA would be approved during the first quarter of 2010.


“We must do it now—not next year, not even this summer. Now,” Trumka said.


Donohue dismissed Trumka’s forecast.


“With everything going on in this country, with an election coming up in 2010, you’re not going to get the votes to pass that legislation as it’s written in this quarter or in any other quarter between now and the election,” Donohue said.


It’s not clear whether the idea to attach EFCA to a jobs bill is gaining support on Capitol Hill—or even across the labor community. Although the AFL-CIO is putting an emphasis on the jobs bill and wants to see quick action on EFCA, there’s no evidence that the two are being linked.


“I’ve not heard anybody create that marriage yet,” said a union consultant who didn’t want to be identified.


Whether it moves as part of broader legislation or as a stand-alone bill, EFCA will stoke controversy. The bill, along with the Department of Labor’s proposed regulatory agenda, is creating uncertainty for business that hampers job creation, according to Donohue.


“We fought these ill-conceived policies successfully last year,” Donohue said. “We’ll pull out all the stops to do it again.”


—Mark Schoeff Jr.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on January 12, 2010August 31, 2018

Illinois Manufacturing Lost 52,000 Jobs, 700 Firms Last Year

The manufacturing industry in Illinois suffered one of its worst declines in nearly a century between November 2008 and November 2009, according to the Illinois Manufacturers Directory.


In the midst of the recession, 51,925 industrial jobs were lost and 709 manufacturing companies shut down in Illinois during the period, the directory reported Monday, January 11. That’s twice the previous year’s decline.


In Chicago, industrial jobs fell 8 percent to about 114,000.


“The country has suffered deep losses in manufacturing employment due to automation and technology, outsourcing and the recession,” said Tom Dubin, president of Manufacturers’ News, which publishes the directory.
 
Hardest hit were industries related to construction and housing. The furniture-fixture industry saw the sharpest drop in jobs, 12.5 percent, followed by wood products.


Machinery—the largest category, and one dominated by Peoria-based Caterpillar Inc. and Moline-based Deere & Co.—saw jobs shrink 6.9 percent. Employment in fabricated metals, the second-biggest sector, fell 5.1 percent to 100,626 jobs. Food products, the No. 3 segment, saw a drop of 2.1 percent, according to the directory.


Also suffering steep drop-offs were transportation equipment, falling 9.7 percent; printing, which dropped 9.5 percent; and textiles and apparel, which slid 9.2 percent. 



Filed by John Pletz of Crain’s Chicago Business, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.


Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.



 

Posted on January 8, 2010January 27, 2020

CDC Urges Swine Flu Vaccinations

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Thursday, January 7, urged Americans of all ages to get vaccinated against the swine flu, saying it wanted to prevent a possible resurgence of the disease in the coming weeks and months.

Though supplies of the H1N1 swine flu vaccine were sporadic during peak flu activity this fall, health officials said there are now enough shots for widespread inoculations.

Health officials said they had 136 million doses available for ordering by the states to supplement what they described as an already ample supply of the vaccine. States could then disburse the medicine to county health departments, doctor offices, hospitals and retail clinics. Most employers with physician-run work-site health clinics would also be eligible to receive the vaccine.

Sixty million people already have been inoculated, but health officials said they wanted to remain vigilant to prevent a resurgence of the flu in the coming weeks and months.

Dr. Anne Schuchat, director of immunization and respiratory disease for the CDC, said the nation faced a similar situation during a flu pandemic at the end of 1957 when health officials saw a decrease in flu activity and stopped encouraging further inoculations. The deadly flu returned with a vengeance in early 1958.

“They had vaccine, but they didn’t encourage its use and yet they did go on to see that increase in mortality,” Schuchat told reporters during a conference call Thursday.

Schuchat said it was not clear whether swine flu would return but that further inoculations were warranted to prevent people from getting sick. Young children, adults with respiratory illnesses and seniors in particular should get the shot, she said.

Flu activity peaked in late October but remains above normal levels, officials said.

—Jeremy Smerd

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on January 4, 2010August 31, 2018

AIG Human Resources Executive Resigns

American International Group Inc.’s vice chairman and its chief compliance officer have resigned, the company said Wednesday, December 30.


Anastasia Kelly, vice chairman for legal, human resources, corporate affairs and corporate communications, resigned from AIG effective Wednesday.


Kelly resigned for “good reason” under terms of AIG’s executive severance plan because of the reduction in her base salary that was mandated by Kenneth Feinberg, the Treasury Department’s special master for executive compensation for Troubled Asset Relief Program recipients.


AIG also said Suzanne Folsom, its chief compliance and regulatory officer, has left to pursue other opportunities.


AIG president and CEO Robert H. Benmosche said in a statement that AIG has started a process to find successors to Kelly and Folsom and expects a smooth transition. People who previously reported to Kelly will report to Benmosche in the interim.


AIG said Kelly joined the company as general counsel in September 2006 and was promoted to vice chairman in 2009. Folsom joined AIG in April 2008.


Filed by Judy Greenwald of Business Insurance, a sister publications of Workforce Management. To comment, e-mail editors@workforce.com.
 
Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.



 

Posted on January 4, 2010August 31, 2018

Dear Workforce How Do We Determine the Meaning Behind Our Employee Engagement Scores?

Numerous studies show clear links between employee engagement, retention and financial success. Measuring and improving employee engagement is time-consuming and difficult to do, but it can be extremely rewarding.

Three key steps help ensure that you will be successful:

1. Define terms and understand benefits and risks.

Benchmarking is used by organizations to evaluate various aspects of their processes or results in relation to “best practices,” usually within their own sector. Employee engagement generally is defined as the strong emotional connection an employee feels for the organization—a connection that causes the employee to exert greater discretionary effort at work.

Organizations benchmark this to compare best-practice engagement scores with their own employee engagement results. Simple, right?

Not really—and there are two risks you need to anticipate.

Risk 1: Benchmarking may not help you to determine what engagement scores actually mean. Although some benchmarking services claim to be the definitive engagement standard for an industry or geography, it pays to be cautious. Identifying a reliable benchmarking source—especially one that is relevant to your organization and sector—is not easy.

Even within the same industry, geography or company size, companies are as different as people and have different cultures, values and ways of getting work done. This makes comparing across companies one of the most widely misused practices. It’s akin to comparing your personality test results with that of one of your peers in another company: interesting result, just not very relevant.

Risk 2: Engagement is defined differently at many organizations. Most of the major recent studies on employee engagement have defined the term differently, and as a result, studies have come up with different key drivers and implications. Companies have different definitions too. If your employee survey results indicate a pattern of low engagement, you know there is a need for improvement. If 60 percent of your employees indicate that they intend to stay with your company, and the benchmark is 52 percent, should you rest on your laurels? If you do, you miss an opportunity to reach an even higher level of engagement.

Given this, you ought to challenge your assumptions about benchmarking and reconsider its value. It may make more sense to establish your own baseline engagement score, set improvement targets, track progress to the target or goal, and seek out the relationships between rising engagement scores and financial or operational success.

2. Design a survey instrument with an engagement index.

Employee surveys are commonly used to determine the level of engagement, which results in an “engagement index” that measures respondents’ attachment, or emotional connection, to the organization. The index is calculated by grouping together questions that are closely linked to employee engagement. For example:

• I would recommend my company as a good place to work.

• I am proud to work for my company.

• At work, I have the opportunity to do what I do best.

• My company can win in the marketplace, and I want to be part of this
success.

• I receive the resources I need to do my job well.

Statistical analysis can reveal that performance on these engagement questions is influenced by performance in critical areas, known as key drivers. A key driver analysis is a statistical procedure that identifies a small number of survey issues that have the greatest overall impact on important outcomes. Determine your strategy to improve on a baseline and/or benchmark results before finalizing the survey design.

3. Establish and implement a strategy to improve baseline results and/or consider internal benchmarking.

Here’s a little secret: There are greater differences between departments within your own company than you will find between companies. The most meaningful and actionable benchmarking is done internally, among groups and departments over time.

Given that employee retention is critical, it’s important to understand how employee engagement scores can be improved. It is, however, less critical how these scores compare with your competitors’. Actions that will improve your baseline scores year over year can help you discover the link between engagement and key financial metrics.

SOURCE: Richard Greenberg, The Breakthru Alliance, Marina Del Rey, California

LEARN MORE: The best talent comes down to three essential ingredients: competence, commitment and contribution. Please click here to learn more.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on December 30, 2009August 31, 2018

R&D Sent to China

Companies such as IBM, Microsoft and Nokia outsource chunks of their research and development and product development work to Symbio, a global product development firm with seven R&D centers in Finland and Sweden and five offshore development centers in mainland China, Taiwan and Bangladesh.


One thousand of Symbio’s 1,400 employees work at three development centers in China, the new world powerhouse for R&D spending and talent.


With its software development engineers in China handling the bulk of the work, Symbio cuts time-to-market for its clients by as much as 25 percent and product engineering costs by as much as 75 percent. “For our clients, costs are a priority, but agility and time-to-market are also key,” says Jacob Hsu, Symbio’s CEO, now based in Beijing. Hsu was educated at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business.


To ensure a steady flow of top talent with company-specific skills, Symbio partners with a major university at each of its three development centers in China.


“Every year, we select 100 top juniors at each university, work with the university to design a curriculum and then move those students into paid internships at Symbio in their senior year,” Hsu explains.


Hsu is unconcerned about reports of wage inflation in China topping 6 percent.


“Whether you are in China or any location, controlling wage inflation comes down to managing your talent pipeline,” he says. “To control costs, we must manage our employees to increase the value of their skills.”


In addition to its training programs for students, the company maintains an internal program that offers 108 different courses for existing employees.


The world spends more than $1.1 trillion a year on R&D, with corporations accounting for 62 percent of the total, according to Booz & Co. Among the top 1,000 global corporate R&D spenders, nine out of 10 conduct R&D activities in multiple locations offshore, with the majority spending more than half of their R&D budget outside their home country. Booz’s 2009 study found that companies spending more of their R&D budget in low-cost locations perform substantially better in sales and market capitalization growth. China is now the single largest net recipient of R&D offshore spending.


Companies commonly lower their R&D labor costs by 40 to 60 percent by offshoring to the developing economies, according to the Boston Consulting Group. Salaries for associate engineers in India average $4,400 per year, compared with $53,400 per year for newly minted engineers in North America or Europe, Boston Consulting Group notes.


Hsu is actively exploring locations for new centers in China but has little appetite for moving into other emerging markets.


“There is still so much room for growth in China, with an incredible upside for workforce expansion and plenty of scale, especially in Tier II cities,” he notes. “We have to stay cost-effective, but we have to tap into the best engineers and experts and they are only in certain locations,” Hsu says.


Increasingly, those locations are in China and India—the preferred sites for offshore R&D. The emerging markets already account for two-thirds of the global engineering talent pool, and that share is rapidly growing, Boston Consulting Group says.


Workforce Management, December 14, 2009, p. 27 — Subscribe Now!

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 … Page 85 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress