Workforce Management, February 2013, p. 20 Subscribe Now!
Impress Me or You’re Dead: The New Rules for How Great Candidates Judge (and Treat) Recruiters
Impress them or you’re dead. Recruiters used to have the power, and maybe they still do with average talent. BUT – if you want to land the best talent as a recruiter, you’re also being judged and evaluated by candidates. Join us for this Workforce webcast, and we’ll show you what your company can do to be successful and what you have to do to deliver great talent.
Recruiting Orientation Guide
Roadmaps are a new form of content to help you navigate key areas of people management. Each Roadmap includes an Orientation Guide that gives a high-level overview of the subject as well as articles and other resources that provide more detailed directions on how to find your way to success. This Roadmap focuses on recruiting wisely in today’s tough job market. The Orientation Guide below will get you started, and we invite you to use the rest of the Roadmap by visiting workforce.com/roadmaps.
The days of putting a help-wanted ad in the local paper to fill a job opening are so 20 years ago.
The past two decades have seen a sea change in how enterprises find and recruit employees. Fortune 1000 corporations, startups and all of the companies in between are acting more strategically to identify, court and hire new talent, and at the same time, automate and outsource a bigger piece of the process.
There’s good reason companies invest so much in recruiting. Talent acquisition has a greater impact on revenue growth than any other people management function—more than onboarding, talent management or performance management and employee rewards, according to an August study by Boston Consulting Group and the World Federation of People Management Associations.
Recruiting’s revolution has seen the rise of job boards and career websites for advertising positions, increasingly more sophisticated systems for handling online applications, and more attention being paid to the natural ties between recruiting and workforce planning on the front end and onboarding at the back. As the world of work goes social and mobile, social recruiting on LinkedIn and other popular networks has taken the industry by storm.
With the gap widening between the skills workers have and what companies say they need, many enterprises are thinking differently about how—and who—they hire. As companies need to stay competitive despite the vagaries of an increasingly global economy, they’re thinking more in terms of filling roles than filling jobs, and using more contingent workers to be quicker to respond to changing business demands. And while they may still retain inside recruiters, they’re just as likely to seek help from recruitment process outsourcers, employee referrals or “talent communities” of ex-employees or retirees.
This orientation guide, part of Workforce‘s Roadmaps series on navigating key areas of people management, provides a high-level overview of talent acquisition today. It covers what recruiting is, the different ways companies find candidates and hire employees, and what you should consider if you’re setting up a recruiting program or changing your company’s hiring practices.
Philosophies: When it comes to filling their workforce needs, companies can follow divergent paths.
Companies regrouping after a merger or bankruptcy or other change may seek people who can help transform their corporate culture.
Another hiring philosophy centers on seeking high-potential candidates. This school of thought, captured in business and management expert Jim Collins’ concept of “getting the right people on the bus,” promotes snagging promising individuals and training them or letting them learn on the job.
A third approach is hiring for targeted skills. Companies don’t have time or resources to train new hires, this thinking goes, especially since employees today are less loyal than in the past. But while this mindset is dominant today, companies that have adopted it are running into some problems. Despite continued high unemployment, companies in some industries say they can’t fill all open positions because too few applicants have the right qualifications for the work. The counterperspective to that, set out in the 2012 book Why Good People Can’t Get Jobs from Wharton Center for Human Resources director Peter Capelli, is that companies are their own biggest barrier to hiring, keeping positions open to save money, not offering adequate wages or being too demanding about qualifications.
In any event, the “skills gap” is forcing more companies to hire high-potential individuals and train them, and to rely more heavily on networking to uncover passive candidates with desired skills.
Account for a changing workforce: Changing workforce dynamics means companies are becoming simultaneously more and less concerned with candidates’ qualifications. As more companies operate as flat organizations with a little middle management and a lot of collaboration, they’re involving more team members in vetting candidates, which can stretch out the recruiting process. At the same time, employees aren’t staying in positions as long as they did in years past, putting pressure on recruiters to make hiring more automated and transactional. “While the consequences of a bad hire are still great, they’re not as bad as they were 30 or 40 years ago” when people stayed with a company for life, says Dan Finnigan, chief executive of social recruiting software maker Jobvite Inc.
Fill positions internally: Recruiting isn’t just about bringing new blood into an organization. In many cases, talent acquisition happens in-house, with existing employees groomed for promotion or trained to fill new positions tied to emerging products or businesses. Such an approach is supported by recent academic research. Employees who are promoted or move laterally perform better in the first two years than external hires despite the fact that they typically make less and have less experience and education, according to a study from the University of Pennsylvania published in the Administration Science Quarterly in December 2011 . When companies fill positions internally, it can push recruiting needs into an organization’s lower ranks, as replacements will be needed to pick up work done by employees who’ve been promoted or made lateral moves.
Recruiting Costs
Create a recruiting budget: Ideally, a company’s human resources or recruiting staff works with hiring managers and other departments to assess current or upcoming workforce needs, the types of jobs to be filled and the desired time frame for filling them. Such information determines the methods recruiters use to find candidates, and that drives the amount that will be spent on recruiting and setting the budget.
Calculate cost per hire: A large part of building a recruiting budget is calculating cost per hire, or CPH, the dollar value of the resources needed to staff one open position. Companies have long used CPH not just for budget purposes but to gauge the effectiveness of their staffing efforts. Until recently, there was little consensus on the best way to calculate CPH. That changed when the Society for Human Resource Management and other industry leaders published the Cost-Per-Hire American National Standard earlier this year. The standard establishes algorithms for measuring CPH within an organization compared with competitors or other outside organizations, and relative to a new hire’s first-year salary, commonly called the recruiting cost ratio.
Planning
Historically, companies planned hiring needs and recruiting budgets from one to three years out. The Great Recession and the economic uncertainty that followed made forecasting business needs and long-term hiring more difficult. As a result, identifying who to hire has become a just-in-time process, with staffing industry experts agreeing it’s become more common for companies to limit workforce planning to six months or a year in advance.
Understanding a company’s hiring philosophy, identifying positions to be filled and creating a budget and planning time frame are just the beginning. From there, recruiters must map out how they’ll fill jobs, including choosing the best workers for openings as well as what internal or external means and technology they’ll use.
Labor Force: Today when companies want to expand their workforce, they’ve got several options. To increase flexibility and tap scarce skills, companies are turning increasingly to contingent workers—temps, contractors, freelancers or other workers not classified as employees. Some companies also hire on a temp-to-permanent basis to test-drive how someone will fit into the position or the culture before bringing them on as an employee. But the bulk of the U.S. labor force continues to consist of full-time employees, and most companies’ recruiting efforts continue to focus on bringing full-time employees into an organization.
Internal and External Recruiting Help
It’s a recruiting industry rule of thumb that three criteria determine how to fill open positions: type of job or jobs to be filled, time frame for filling them and budget.
Given those parameters, companies may use some or all of the following:
- Internal recruiters: The ranks of internal recruiters have shrunk as companies have downsized HR departments. But internal recruiters are still used to staff jobs deemed too important to outsource to an outside recruiter, whether those positions are for salespeople, scientists or customer service agents. Companies also rely on internal recruiters when they’re doing too few hires a year to justify paying an outside firm.
- Sourcers: In the pre-Internet days, sourcers compiled lists of prospective candidates from print directories, expensive databases and contacts from years in the business. Software and social networks radically altered that. Today’s sourcers are social media specialists who use the Internet, join online groups, and cull online résumés to generate qualified leads.
- External recruiters: Companies employ headhunters and specialty recruiters when they’re hiring for high-level executives, positions that require hard-to-find skills, or when they’re staffing more jobs than their internal staff can handle in the required time period.
- Recruitment process outsourcing: Some companies outsource some or all of their hiring to an outside agency that generally works under a long-term contract to staff multiple types of positions. The same bad economy that forced many companies to downsize internal HR operations boosted RPO providers, not just in the United States but worldwide. The trend is one reason RPO revenue jumped 25 percent in 2011.
Recruiting Technology
Companies mapping out their recruiting strategy have an overwhelming array of technologies to choose from. If they’re startups or redoing a system from scratch, it’s an opportunity to evaluate whether to integrate it into a larger HR management system or companywide enterprise resource planning software. It’s also an opportunity to evaluate systems sold as a service, also called cloud-based software, because it’s used and information is stored via the Internet, which is where the bulk of new recruiting technology is headed.
Software used for talent acquisition includes:
- Applicant tracking systems: The granddaddy of recruiting software, these programs are used to create, screen and manage online applications, parse résumés for job-related keywords, maintain applicant profiles, schedule interviews, handle communications between recruiters and hiring managers, and they also synch with other HR information systems. Newer ATS software plugs into popular social networks.
- Talent management suites: The multifunction people management software includes or works with Applicant tracking system programs. Talent management suites also include modules for performance reviews, compensation tracking, succession planning, online learning and learning management, goal setting and workforce analytics.
Assessments: Assessment software includes everything from job-applicant ability screenings to personality or behavior tests companies give high-level executives to determine their leadership style.
Social and Mobile Recruiting
Social media has revolutionized how companies source and recruit employees. Instead of flipping through Rolodexes, recruiters generate leads by looking up people’s profiles on social networks such as LinkedIn. Recruiters also use social media to vet applicants. Software developers now offer apps built on top of Facebook and Twitter that recruiters and job seekers use, including programs such as BeKnown, BranchOut and Glassdoor.
The popularity of social recruiting goes hand in hand with widespread use of mobile devices by job seekers, employees and HR staff. “Mobile is the hardware for social recruiting software,” say Gerry Crispin, co-founder of consulting firm CareerXroads. “It’s not a question of if but of how fast you’re going to adopt mobile-enabled practices.”
Macy’s Inc. was an early adopter of mobile recruiting. Executive recruiting director Owen Williams fills 80 store manager positions a year. There’s no way he could do it all without his BlackBerry and a LinkedIn app, which he uses everywhere, including on the walk to and from his car in the company parking lot. “It’s amazing what work I can get done in that walk,” he told Workforce in a 2011 interview.
Once recruiters have the foundation and framework in place, they can put the finishing touches on their hiring program: promoting open positions, using assessments, interviews and other means to screen applicants and candidates, doing background checks, and finally, making an offer and finalizing a hire.
Promoting Open Positions
Recruiting has gone digital. Newspaper help-wanted advertising, once a recruiting mainstay, has decreased dramatically in the past 20 years. In its place, companies market and merchandise job openings like products, using online campaigns and also tapping into internal and external networks.
Here are some of the ways recruiters can spread the word about job openings:
- Career websites or microsites: Twenty years after companies first started posting open positions online, even the smallest have job listings or career microsites on their websites. But there’s room for improvement: less than half do a “good” or “really, really good” job of conveying their employment brand to job candidates, according to a 2012 job seeker survey from Crispin’s consulting firm, CareerXroads.
- Employee referrals: Referrals account for close to a third of new hires and produce employees that research shows perform better and stay longer. That’s causing more companies to incorporate referrals into their recruiting efforts, including using software that lets employees share job openings with their social networks.
- Job boards: Though not as popular as they once were, job boards still account for 20.1 percent of new hires, according to CareerXroads. Job boards aren’t as homogenous as they once were either, with the latest iteration including aggregators such as SimplyHired and Indeed that pull from other job sites, and niche boards such as Dice that cover specific industries or locations. To get listings in front of as many eyeballs as possible, job board services such as Monster and CareerBuilder license their listings to social networks and other websites.
- Social media: As social recruiting becomes widespread, it has become common for recruiters to post openings as status updates on LinkedIn or Twitter, with links back to full descriptions on the company’s career site. Companies can also use services such as Glassdoor and YouTube to post video job descriptions, workplace walkthroughs and employee reviews of what their own hiring interviews were like.
- Recruiters: Companies still use headhunters, but blind calls are on the way out. Headhunters need to be more transparent about opportunities because job seekers—who can go online and find out everything they want to know about a company in a matter of minutes—demand it.
- College recruiting: Companies hit by the bad economy might not do as much on-campus recruiting as they once did, but they still may need to maintain a presence. Today, that can include using apps to stay in touch with potential recruits. Eighty percent of new hires for National Instruments Corp.’s U.S. operations are new college graduates, so for the Austin maker of computerized measurement tools creating a career app is a no brainer. “Students have quite a few companies to choose from, and we want to make sure when they want to apply to us they can do it quickly,” recruiting manager Roxanne Green says in this 2010 Workforce story.
- Internal postings: Internal social networks such as Yammer and Rypple that companies are adopting for employee collaboration also can be used to post job openings, a supplement to advertising open positions in company newsletters and elsewhere.
- Talent communities: Because employee referrals have proven so crucial to finding qualified candidates, companies are taking things a step further and reaching out to ex-employees and others who could become useful. That includes setting up real-world and online communities to connect with retirees, interns, college students, vendors and suppliers.
Screening Candidates
Once a job’s listed, the work of sifting through résumés for candidates and putting them through additional screenings begins. Today, recruiting software can be used to “read” applications and parse high-potential prospects from less qualified applicants. Companies also can choose to use additional screenings. Here’s a breakdown of some options:
- Pre-hiring assessments: Companies can administer a comprehensive assessment or test of a standard list of questions to help determine a candidate’s traits, experience and values. Recruiters may choose to incorporate pre-hiring assessments into online applications if they’re hiring for a large number of openings or anticipate being inundated with applications.
- Personality and behavioral tests: Recruiters can administer Myers Briggs and other common personality or behavior tests to learn more about a candidate’s world view or to assess how they would handle specific work-related situations.
- Executive assessments: If companies are hiring C-level executives or other upper management, they can run candidates through additional extensive evaluations of their leadership skills. Consultants such as Brad Smart, an industrial psychologist and proponent of the “top grading” theory of hiring “A” players to produce “A” companies, recommends that companies use interviews to dig deep into a candidate’s prior work experience plus thorough reference check-ins with former bosses for the best possible picture of their strengths and weaknesses.
Interviews
The face-to-face interview remains a hiring mainstay. But today, companies can choose from many approaches. Some may still limit interviews to recruiters and hiring managers. Others opt to include up to a room’s worth of current employees, especially if the person being hired will work on a project basis with multiple work teams.
Some companies put candidates through a battery of situational questions or workplace simulations to gauge their ability to problem solve in real time. Others ask “trick” questions that have nothing to do with the job to see how candidates think on the fly, emulating Google Inc.’s now famous interview process.
Alternatives to standard hiring methods: Pushed by the economy, competition and changing technology, recruiters also are moving beyond face-to-face interviews and other traditional hiring practices. More conduct video interviews or stage competitions to identify top prospects. Innovative tech companies run coding contests called “hackathons” or monitor open-source-code-sharing sites to evaluate software developers’ skills.
These days, even companies that hire mostly full-time employees may not bring them on-site for interviews or to work. The rise of the virtual workplace means recruiters may look for potential employees with characteristics or skills that would make them successful working from a remote location or telecommuting.
BrightScope Inc. co-founder and CEO Mike Alfred embraces alternative hiring methods, including social recruiting. Alfred hired the San Diego-based 401(k) ratings service company’s sales manager after inviting him on a run up a mountain. “I could tell he was hurting, but at the end he asked, ‘What’s next?’ ” Alfred says. “At the time we hired him we didn’t have a sales organization and he had no formal sales experience. Now he’s one of the best in the industry. There were a couple of things I learned about him through this nontraditional interview process that led me to believe he would be exceptional. If I had relied on a consensus-driven approach, he wouldn’t have made the cut.”
Compliance: HR staff can use reference checks and background checks to vet a promising candidate before extending an offer. But companies need to be careful not to use background checks to discriminate. Depending on the state, companies may also need to run potential employees through the federal E-Verify system for checking their work eligibility. Companies that work as government contractors also must comply with additional federal requirements for affirmative action and other programs. Any external recruiters that government contractors use are held to the same standards, so companies that outsource part or all of their talent acquisition to third parties needs to educate them on what they can and cannot do.
With the rise of social recruiting, companies have run into legal trouble by asking job candidates for passwords to their Facebook or Twitter accounts during background checks or other screenings.
Companies also can run afoul of federal labor laws that govern things such as minimum-wage rules, exemptions and overtime if they rely on independent contractors or other contingent workers but treat them like employees.
Choosing a candidate: Once a company’s recruiting or other staff has completed assessments and interviews, background checks and reference checks, it’s time to identify a candidate and make an offer. Exactly who’s making the hiring decision depends on the organization. At some, a hiring manager or management team makes the decision with guidance from a recruiter or HR staff. Organizations with less middle management and more collaboration across departments or functions may hire by consensus, with multiple individuals having a say, especially if whoever’s being brought onboard will work with a number of teams or departments.
Once everyone agrees on a candidate, they need to hammer out the details of the offer. At some companies, a compensation specialist or other HR staffer assists in this to ensure the package being offered matches the candidate’s qualifications and skills and also that it’s in line with the company’s compensation program. When the time comes, recruiting experts suggest making an oral offer first, hashing out any sticking points, and then following up with contracts or other paperwork.
Recruiting’s responsibilities end once a candidate becomes an employee. For a successful transition and onboarding, companies need to make sure the realities of the new employee’s job match what was presented to them during the recruiting process.
With business moving at the speed of a text message, it’s not good enough to review a recruiting plan once a year—or even once a month. To keep pace with changing business goals, hiring trends and technologies, recruiters need to analyze and revise their hiring process on a regular basis. “In the old days we called it total quality improvement,” Jobvite’s Finnigan says. “It’s never anything you perfect. It’s ongoing improvement.”
Measure key variables: Some key variables recruiters can use to gauge the effectiveness of their work include:
- Number of applications for open positions and ratio of hires to applications
- Time to hire, or how quickly positions are filled
- Percentage of positions filled through various recruiting channels
- Cost per hire
- Quality of hire, by retention rate, performance or other measures
- Retention rates of new hires by recruiting channel
In addition to those milestones, recruiters, HR staff and other business units should review on a less regular basis – once or twice a year – the effects changing business needs have on the number and types of positions to be filled. Recruiters also can use this data analysis to determine what the characteristics of great performers in the organization are and then apply that to how they hire.
Review against the competition: A recruiting review should take into account not just how staffing stacks up against internal benchmarks but how a company compares to competitors or other businesses in its industry. CareerBuilder spells it out in its Ultimate Recruitment Guide e-book: “If you’re only examining your metrics internally and not benchmarking against the industry, how do you know how you compare to your competitors for talent in terms of recruitment success? Where do you really measure up?”
Now that we’ve set down the basics, we’ve organized a Roadmap Review into three parts to help you plan and execute your recruiting program. Here is a summary of the Plan, Do and Review of hiring employees:
- Determine the company’s recruiting philosophy, which are the core principles driving hiring efforts.
- Use HR analytics and other workforce planning tools to identify jobs that need to be filled.
- Map out a recruiting budget, planning and review process.
- Decide if hiring employees or contingent workers meets workforce needs.
- Engage internal staff or retain third parties to assist with recruiting efforts.
- Use internal and external programs to promote open positions.
- Run prospective candidates through approved assessments.
- Make job offers and finalize hiring.
- Analyze key variables on an ongoing basis.
- Analyze long-term variables at least once a year.
- Use recruiting data for workforce planning.
Beyond HR: The New Science of Human Capital: This 2007 book from University of Southern California management professor John Boudreau and co-author Peter Ramstad on using recruiting and talent management to gain a competitive edge.
CareerBuilder’s Ultimate Recruitment Guide: This e-book guide on hiring basics, from the online job services company.
Contingent Workforce Management: The Next-Generation Guidebook to Managing the Modern Contingent Workforce Umbrella: May 2012 paid report from industry researcher Aberdeen Group on how companies can best build and maintain temporary labor forces.
CareerXroads: Staffing industry consulting firm that sponsors a yearly mystery job seeker survey and Candes.org awards to help companies improve their online recruiting efforts.
Cost Per Hire American National Standard: Algorithm and related benchmarks for calculating cost of staffing open positions in organizations, published by the American National Standards Institute Inc. and Society for Human Resource Management in spring 2012.
Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap … and Others Don’t: Business and management expert Jim Collins’ seminal work on what makes some companies standout, with details on such concepts as Level 5 Leadership and First Who (get the right people on the bus, then figure out where to drive it).
mRecruitingcamp blog: News on mobile recruiting, and home of mRecruitingcamp conference, which is held every September.
“Paying More to Get Less: The Effects of External Hiring versus Internal Mobility“: Study by University of Pennsylvania professor Matthew Bidwell published in the Administrative Science Quarterly in December 2011 on value of internal promotions vs. external hires.
The Recruiter’s Lounge: Sourcing industry expert Jim Stroud’s blog on all things related to recruiting.
Why Good People Can’t Get Jobs: Wharton Center for Human Resources director Peter Cappelli’s June 2012 book on the gap between job openings, skills companies are looking for, and what it will take for the country to fill the gap.
Japanese Company Buys Online Jobs Aggregator Indeed.com
A multibillion dollar Japanese human resources and information technology conglomerate made its highest profile U.S. acquisition to date, announcing Sept. 25 it will buy top jobs website Indeed for an undisclosed sum in a deal that could close as soon as next month.
Indeed’s purchase by Recruit Co. provides the Austin-based company with the capital it needs to continue expanding outside the United States, especially in Asia. While half of Indeed’s website traffic comes from non-U.S. job seekers, less than half its advertising revenue is international, says Anne Murguia, the company’s senior director of corporate marketing. “We’ve just scratched the surface in terms of monetizing that traffic,” Murguia says.
Widely regarded as an online jobs site industry leader, Indeed has seen revenue double three years in a row. The company has operated in the black since 2007, Murguia says. She declined to disclose current revenue or earnings.
The acquisition quiets rumors that Indeed.com had been pursuing an initial public offering to raise funds for expansion, following the path of HR tech companies such as Workday and Cornerstone OnDemand that have gone public in recent months or are expected to in the near future.
Opting to become part of a deep-pocketed, multinational company frees Indeed from the worries that come with operating as a public company, says job board industry analyst Jeff Dickey-Chasins. “It’s a more immediate payoff for those who’ve invested,” he says. “The IPO business is always chancy.”
One of those investors, the New York Times, is selling its interest in Indeed as part of the acquisition and will record an after-tax gain of about $100 million because of it, according to a Reuters report.
The deal is expected to close early in the fourth quarter. Once it does, Indeed will operate as an independent subsidiary. Co-founders Rony Kahan and Paul Forster will stay with the company, however, Murguia declined to say whether they have signed formal employment agreements to that effect.
Indeed may be the most high-profile American HR company Recruit Co. has acquired, but it’s not the first. In December 2011, the Japanese company bought privately held, U.S.-based staffing firm Advantage Resourcing America, Inc., and a British affiliate for $410 million from private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management LP.
The deal is the latest in a string of American HR tech vendor acquisitions in the past 12 months that has seen Oracle buy Taleo, SAP buy SuccessFactors and IBM buy talent management software provider Kenexa Corp. for $1.3 billion.
Indeed’s purchase comes at a time when the fate of other major jobs sites is evolving. Monster Worldwide Inc. has entertained several offers since chairman Sal Iannuzzi put the other jobs site market leader up for sale in spring. Earlier this month, CareerBuilder, partly owned by newspaper giant Gannett Co., bought an employment data and labor market analysis company as a way into the HR “big data” business.
Michelle V. Rafter is a Workforce contributing editor. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.
How Do We Ask the Right Interview Questions?
Dear Need for Speed:
Start with the résumés. You learn a lot about candidates—not only from what they tell you, but what they exclude—their effectiveness as a communicator and the overall presentation. The devil is in the details, so watch the details. Review each résumé for specific skills, experience and quantifiable attributes that align with the position you wish to fill. Check employment dates, being mindful of large gaps in employment—why might that be? Note also basic fundamentals such as grammar, spelling, font choices and the general layout. Lack of professionalism/attention to detail in a résumé is a sure warning sign that you can expect the same from their work.
Skill assessments are another good way to objectively qualify desirable candidates. If you have assessments, send them out before phone screenings and use them as proof of the skills required. Candidates who pass the résumé review and skill-assessment phase are worth a brief phone screening.
Keep these initial screenings to five minutes and ask the following four questions, but remember not to discuss the company or position before you qualify them through your process.
- In one minute or less, walk me through your current responsibilities. (The objective is to assess whether a person really possesses the experience and skills required.)
- Why are you looking? (You need to understand their motivation—why you, why now?
- What are you looking for in your next position/employer? (If the answer does not gel with your company or the position, stop the interview and move on. Don’t waste your time, or theirs, trying to change their mind or talk them into your company.)
- What sets you apart from your competitors on this position? (The person ought to be able to clearly articulate the value she or she brings to your organization. Today, everyone must bring value to the table. If they can’t answer or well on the phone, they’ll never be able to do it once hired.)
During this screening call, you are looking to uncover a few basic fundamentals: Does the candidate speak and communicate effectively? Are you getting straight, honest and engaging dialogue? Do you sense a healthy self-esteem—solid confidence but paired with enough humility to work with your team, clients and vendors? Does the candidate have the skills that you’re looking for? And perhaps most important—what does your gut tell you? Initial intuition is remarkably accurate. How many times have you talked yourself into hiring someone you were initially apprehensive about but who worked out well?
Provided the candidate’s passes these initial checkpoints with flying colors, tell him or her about the position and extend the invitation for a formal interview. If not, let the candidate know right then and there that it doesn’t sound like a good fit. You owe the person that much, and the finality makes it easier for you to move on to the next option.
SOURCE: Deborah Millhouse, CEO Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina
LEARN MORE: Southwest Airlines screens candidates for cultural fit.
The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.
General Motors Focuses on Team Thinking When Recruiting Workers
Manual dexterity is nice.
But team thinking is better, according to the new hiring philosophy at General Motors Corp. as it recruits workers for new factory jobs.
Pared back by plant closings, workforce reduction and global reorganization, GM now finds itself in the unfamiliar position of needing new workers. Until now, in recent decades, GM has peopled its new factories mostly from banks of laid-off workers and employee transfers from other locations. GM is now forecasting enough manufacturing expansion to require large-scale employee recruitment.
But expectations have changed since the last time GM was recruiting, says Scott Whybrew, GM’s executive director for global manufacturing engineering.
It’s no longer enough to hire a plant worker who is good with his or her hands, handy with tools and in good physical condition, he says. “We’re looking for people who display teamwork, and people who can handle multiple jobs.
“We want people who can drive quality through the organization,” Whybrew says. “The people we’ll be hiring off the street will need to be problem-solvers, and have an aptitude for leadership.”
The reason for the change is the global spread of GMS—the General Motors System of standardized operations, says Whybrew, who spoke at the 2012 Management Briefing Seminars in Traverse City, Michigan, on Aug. 6.
GMS relies on shop-floor employees working in teams to make their own calls on product quality. New vehicle production lines rely on workers to make decisions about quality “in-station,” or at the spot where a task is being performed.
“That represents a change for us,” Whybrew says. “It’s a different personal attribute than we’ve looked for in the past.”
GM is still working through a pool of workers displaced by its 2009-10 downsizing. But new projects are triggering recruiting drives.
Since late last year, it has revealed plans to hire 1,110 in Arlington, Texas, 1,900 in Spring Hill, Tennessee, 437 in Wentzville, Missouri., and 200 at its Hamtramck plant in Detroit. All of the projects will involve a mix of existing workers and new recruits.
Lindsay Chappell writes for Automotive News, a sister publication of Workforce Management. Comment below or email editors@workforce.com.
Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.
What Is Wrong With Our Recruitment Process?
Dear It Hurts:
Turnover mostly occurs early in a person’s tenure. However, if turnover in your organization is unacceptably high, it could indicate a systemic problem. There are a number of things that could contribute to early turnover, including:
- Poor supervision or management
- Bad working conditions
- Poor fit between the person and the company’s culture
- Disconnect between the jobs as described versus the actual on-the-job experience.
The best way to analyze the real cause is to conduct exit interviews with departing candidates. That helps you determine the root causes of the problem. You then are better able to take the appropriate remedial actions, which might include changes to the hiring profiles, realistic job previews, job redesign or supervisory training. As you imply, this may be an issue with your recruiting process, which is frequently the case of very early turnover (less than six months or so). Or it may be due to other systemic issues that the company and the recruiting department need to address.
SOURCE: Ed Davis, Alta Search Group, Chicago
LEARN MORE: The cost of poor hiring decisions continues to worry many organizations.
The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.
Supporting startup growth with the new recruiting ecosystem
The recruiting ecosystem is changing, led by professional social networks like LinkedIn and Viadeo and social media apps like Jobvite and BranchOut.
This report examines how the new ecosystem creates a streamlined, scientific and democratic approach to the recruiting process, and in turn, changes the way startups and growing businesses find and retain their employees.
Download this report to learn about success stories and recommendations on how to take full advantage of innovative technology to help your efforts to attract and retain top talent.
Auto Dealer Finds Recruiting Success by Offering Workers ‘Bounty’ to Bring in Talent
For dealer Frank Allocca, finding service technicians is not a problem.
Allocca, owner of Intercar Mercedes-Benz, Sussex Honda and Newton Kia, all in Newton, New Jersey, recruits many of his mechanics right out of high school.
And it’s no small feat given that his three dealerships are in a rural area in the Northwest corner of New Jersey. Newton has a population of about 8,100 people, Allocca says.
Allocca trains the students who qualify and eventually might offer them a full-time job with competitive pay, generous benefits and pleasant working conditions.
And if that doesn’t work, he jokes, he’ll use bribery.
“If you want to find a service technician, it’s easy,” Allocca says with his gruff New Jersey accent. “Put $1,000 bounty on them and go into your service department and say, ‘I’m looking for a good technician and if any of you find one and he or she stays here for at least three months, I’ll pay you $1,000.’ These mechanics know other mechanics.”
Allocca has hired many mechanics that way because, he says, employees will never recommend someone they do not trust.
The dealer says he spent $6.7 million in 2011 to make his Mercedes-Benz store comply with the brand’s Autohaus renovation requirements. Technicians love to work in a new facility, but doing the remodeling didn’t factor into his ability to attract technicians; his techs earn $50,000 to $120,000 a year.
Allocca says he has annual total new and used sales of about 5,000 vehicles.
And he knows how to handle his mechanics because he spent 13 years as a service manager before buying a dealership in 1973. He speaks their language, he says.
“Most dealers come out of the sales end. They don’t know how to speak to these kids and judge who they can talk to and how they go about it,” Allocca says. “They’re so focused on sales that the service and parts departments are secondary in their thinking process. And finding mechanics is foreign to them because they’ve never worked in that area.”
Allocca also works with area high schools that offer work-study programs. He has donated vehicles and tools to the schools’ vocational technology classes to encourage kids to take an interest in mechanics.
From the work-study program, Allocca says that of every 10 or so applicants, one or two are qualified. He hires them part time for entry level jobs such as oil changes. If they do well and show an interest in progressing, he continues to train them and send them to manufacturer training programs to get certified. He has been doing that for 36 years. Over the years he has hired well over 20 students into full-time service jobs from the program, he says.
“There are a lot of young men who like to work on their cars. We’re in a rural area where there are young men who worked on machinery on their farms,” Allocca says.
Those high school students who come to work for him often lack refined skills, but “they have lots of enthusiasm,” he says.
Allocca says he makes sure his employees are happy so that he doesn’t have to keep recruiting replacements. Of his 133 full-time and part-time employees in all departments at his three dealerships, Allocca proudly says 39 have worked for him for 10 years or longer.
Allocca pays 85 percent of the cost of health insurance for employees and their families. He gives employees holidays off and two weeks paid vacation each year. He used to offer three weeks paid vacation, but he learned many mechanics used the extra week to work for other shops for extra money. So he reduced his paid vacation policy to two weeks but gave each of his mechanics a raise even in the middle of a recession, he says.
“Every employee knows they can walk into my office and talk to me if they have a problem,” Allocca says. “What really makes the difference for us is word-of-mouth by our employees to other employees.”
Jamie LaReau writes for Automotive News, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.
Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.
And Action: GetHired.com Cues Video
GetHired.com wants to shake up the recruiting business by giving away its Web-based, video-focused job board and applicant tracking system, or ATS, software, taking a page from Facebook and other companies that have ridden the “free” business model to stratospheric success.
Free or not, the Palo Alto, California, startup needs to overcome some monumental obstacles to accomplish its goal, including besting much larger, entrenched competitors as well as continued doubt over how much demand exists for video résumés and video job boards.
The year-old business rolled out a combination job board-ATS platform in late January after six months of invitation-only testing. GetHired.com CEO Suki Shah won’t disclose how many job seekers or corporate clients the company has signed up, though its website features testimonials from businesses such as Boston Medical Group and LegalZoom.com Inc.
The ATS portion of GetHired.com’s software includes modules that companies can use to add audio or video pre-screening tools to job listings. The software also has built-in calendaring and videoconferencing, giving companies a soup-to-nuts option for finding, interviewing and onboarding candidates, Shah says.
On the job-board side, job hunters can create accounts on GetHired.com’s website to scan posted jobs, create profiles, upload their résumés and record video clips that recruiters can browse.
The 14-person company raised $1.75 million from Silicon Valley angel investors to finance its roll out, and could have news about additional funding soon, Shah says. “We’re farther along in the engineering side” than other video résumé startups, he says. “A lot of those companies aren’t able to raise the funds to develop a team, and don’t have a vision that’s as big as ours. We haven’t seen any true competitor that’s doing what we do.”
Not everyone is convinced the human resources industry needs another ATS or another job board, even if they’re free. “Really, a job board that includes an ATS? How 1995. I believe that this was the beginning model for HotJobs and has been tried repeatedly over the years,” says longtime HR technology analyst John Sumser. Early job board leader HotJobs was acquired by Yahoo in 2002 and later sold to Monster Worldwide Inc., which merged it into its own employment offerings.
“The problem is that one job board can’t satisfy all of a company’s needs no matter how wickered into social media it is,” Sumser says. “This business model requires customers to take a risk before the operation could possibly prove a value.”
GetHired.com is entering an ATS market packed with large, well-established players with their own Web-based software, including iCIMS, Jobvite Inc. and Taleo Corp. That landscape was jolted in February when Oracle announced it would spend $1.9 billion to buy Taleo, which sells ATS software as part of its talent management software suite.
On the job board side of its business, GetHired.com must compete with long-standing competitors such as Monster and CareerBuilder. It will also have to deal with a multitude of startups promising to help job seekers distinguish themselves from the masses via video résumés, links to social networks or both .
Shah shakes off criticism, saying companies will try GetHired.com alongside whatever else they’re using because it doesn’t cost anything—at least for now. Once the company has developed a big-enough user base, he plans to charge for advertising and add a small fee for job listings—”a 10th or 20th of what it costs now,” Shah says.
Some recruiters remain wary of video résumés or job boards, concerned they could be accused of discriminating against job seekers based on age or other characteristics that are visually apparent. In particular, government contractors have to avoid even the appearance of discriminating against job applicants or risk running afoul of hiring compliance regulations, says one Dallas talent acquisition professional who requested anonymity because he is not authorized to speak on behalf of his company. “If I were in the third-party recruiting world, I would love these things, it would help you get to know everyone and who would do best in front of your hiring manager,” the recruiter says. “But when you put on your HR hat, it’s major scary red flags all over.”
Michelle V. Rafter is a Workforce Management contributing editor .To comment, email editors@workforce.com.