Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Staffing Management

Posted on December 16, 2011August 8, 2018

Preventing Employee Burnout: Customized Solutions

Employers are demanding more and employees are engaging less, but there is one way to keep your best workers from checking out completely—recognizing who they are and rewarding them accordingly, according to a recent survey by consultancy Towers Watson & Co.

It sounds simple, but few employers are doing it, according to Laura Sejen, global practice leader at the New York-based consulting firm. The process is called “segmentation” and it involves identifying which employees have the greatest impact on the company’s bottom line and customizing a talent management and rewards program to keep them engaged.

While 71 percent of companies formally identify top performers and 68 percent of them tab their high potential employees, only 28 percent actually let their high-potential workers know that that’s how they are viewed, according to the 2011/12 Talent Management and Rewards Study. And just 44 percent of survey respondents said they identify critical-skill employees at all—those who possess the skills a company needs most to compete in their industry.

“That to us represents a lost opportunity to enhance engagement and reduce retention risks,” Sejen says. “If the reason that you identify employees in that high-potential group is to invest more resources on them, more training dollars, or development opportunities and that group doesn’t know what’s going on, you won’t get the ROI you’re looking for.”

In the high-pressure workplace, a little recognition can go a long way, but surprisingly, very few companies offer customized employment deals for key employees, according to the survey, which polled HR professionals at 318 organizations in the U.S. and Canada.

“A lot of companies haven’t thought about this or have had a hard time getting their arms around it,” Sejen says. But that needs to change, she adds, because the economic climate is not likely to improve anytime soon.

“We think it’s prudent to expect ongoing volatility and uncertainty,” Sejen says. “Employers are saying, ‘I’ve got to be careful how I spend my money on rewards and recognition. I can’t be all things to all people. I really need to be focused on these segments that will drive the business forward.’ But we employers are not doing as much as we should.”

There is resistance to the concept of customized employment deals, she says, in part because line managers are uncomfortable explaining to employees that only a select group will be receiving certain financial rewards or career development opportunities.

“It’s hard to have those conversations,” she says.


To read more about the ‘work-more economy,’ click here.

Rita Pyrillis is Workforce Management’s senior writer. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

Posted on November 21, 2011August 8, 2018

Effective Talent Assessment Starts (and Ends) With Leadership

Talent assessment is a hot topic in the human resources industry. Defined as “the process used to help employers identify the right job candidates for their company,” talent assessment is increasingly recognized as a critical component of company performance and success—especially amid today’s economic landscape.

As companies start hiring again and employees search for new and better opportunities, effective talent assessment can give companies a distinct advantage in identifying and attracting top talent.

In addition, although the economy is recovering, many companies are still feeling the aftermath of the Great Recession. Recovery is steady, but slow, and businesses are reluctant to accrue unnecessary expenses. A bad hiring decision can cost a company more than 1.5 times the mis-hire’s salary, depending on the level of the role. With the right assessment, businesses can avoid this cost.

While businesses are starting to understand the need for assessment, they do not necessarily understand how to build an effective assessment practice. At the end of the day, talent assessment is about identifying and promoting top performers so that they can successfully execute company objectives and goals as their company’s future leaders.

More often than not, assessment is not aligned with companies’ overall strategies and goals. Instead, it is conducted in a vacuum—with little feedback or input from leaders already well-acquainted with and knowledgeable about their company’s culture, values and vocabulary.

In order for talent assessment to be effective, it must be heavily supported by senior-level executives. To achieve this, HR professionals can utilize five strategies—outlined below—to help involve company leadership in talent assessment creation and investment.

1. Conduct a brainstorming session on company vocabulary. Few initiatives are healthier for business than brainstorming. In order to ensure that talent assessment aligns with a company’s vocabulary and culture, invite senior-level executives to attend a brainstorming session where they identify key words and phrases that define the company’s mission and goals. Then, use the resulting vocabulary across all assessment materials.

2. Interview top talent. In order to better understand the characteristics of the leaders your company will need in the future, sit down with senior executives and ask them what traits they believe led to their success, what motivates them every day, and what talent gaps (if any) exist within the company. Then, align the company’s assessment with the competencies most commonly discussed.

3. Enlist senior executives to help set the bar. Share interview questions and other testing resources used in the assessment process with key leadership executives. Encourage them to review the materials and revise or add to the documents based on their experience. They can shed valuable insight on which traits and characteristics to look for in candidates.

4. Invite senior executives to conduct assessments. If possible, invite senior leaders to interview job candidates. Their extensive experience and expertise enables them to easily and articulately assess and describe an individual’s strengths and needs in ways other executives might not.

5. Invite senior leaders to personally seek out talent. Although many leaders may already do this, it’s good to remind senior-level executives to actively scout for talent—either within the company or outside of it. Doing so helps ensure a good fit when a position opens up because executives will already be familiar with the skills or the person needed to fulfill the position.

At a time in which CEOs are expected to report to their boards on succession plans, leadership strengths and talent-related risks, it makes sound business sense to include upper-level management in the creation of talent assessment practices. They can bring consistency and clarity to the assessment process and help ensure that the right talent is constantly circulating within the company.

How can HR executives convince today’s busy senior management professionals to care about talent development? Research shows that talent initiatives such as competency modeling and assessment are vastly improved when built collaboratively between HR executives and their business leaders.

According to research from Aberdeen Group, top-performing companies are 2.5 times more likely than other companies to involve senior leaders in talent development.

Further, in a survey of 439 companies, Aberdeen illustrates that best-in-class companies have business leaders that are held accountable for critical talent processes. The bottom line is that business leaders help ensure that the outcomes of talent initiatives match their organization’s needs, helping the company achieve long-term success and growth.

Ultimately, when senior-level executives are actively part of the assessment process, their companies reap the benefits, which include increased employee loyalty and engagement, increased diversity of talent, low turnover rate among high performers, increased customer satisfaction and better market performance.

Paul Eccher and Dave Ross are co-founders and principals of the Vaya Group (vayapath.com), a talent management consultancy.

Posted on November 18, 2011August 8, 2018

Data Bank Focus: Unemployment – Not all bad news

While the national unemployment rate remained unchanged from July through September at 9.1 percent, the picture is rosier in some states and decidedly less so in others. The oil boom in North Dakota has helped keep the state’s unemployment at an unusually low 3.5 percent. Nevada unemployment, while down from 14.9 percent a year ago, has risen for the third straight month as tourism along with new construction remains sluggish.

Unfortunately, the states with low unemployment don’t make much of a dent in the nation’s overall rate because they tend to be small. For example, in North Dakota 96.5 percent of the workforce is employed, but this represents just 360,000 employed and 13,000 unemployed workers. In California, where unemployment is at 12.1 percent, close to 2.2 million workers are idle.

Posted on November 16, 2011August 8, 2018

How Do We Determine an Applicant’s Flexibility and Problem-Solving Skill?

Dear Hiring for Attitude:

Behavioral-based interview questions will help you determine whether a candidate possesses the behavioral traits you seek for the position. Behavioral-based interviewing is based on the theory that past behavior and performance predict future behavior and performance.

For example, if you would like to get a feel for the candidate’s adaptability, you might ask:

“Describe a situation when you had to adjust to changes over which you had no control.”

A candidate’s flexibility may become evident in the answer to a question such as:

“Give an example of a time when you had difficulty persuading someone to your point of view. What did you do?”

And the following questions are useful to uncover a candidate’s problem-solving ability:

• “Describe the most difficult working relationship you’ve had with a fellow employee, team member or supervisor. Were you able to improve the relationship? How?”

• “Tell me about a time when you did something completely different from the plan or assignment in order to solve a problem.”

Follow-up questions that delve deeper into the candidate’s answers are critical to getting an accurate read on these traits. After the candidate describes a situation and his or her behavior, follow up with questions such as. “Why did you take that action? What was the outcome? How could you have handled it differently?”

Compare the candidate’s answers with the specific traits essential to success on the job so that you can determine whether he or she is a good match for your company.

SOURCE: Deborah Millhouse, CEO Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina

LEARN MORE: Use pre-assessment tests carefully, never using them as the sole basis for a hiring decision, experts say.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Posted on November 16, 2011August 8, 2018

Tips for Two at the Top

Few companies have co-chief executive officers. Human resources consultant Mercer found only 10 examples in its database of more than 300 companies. Before championing this management model, you may want to heed what’s helped others.

Have distinct, complementary skills. Think the abrasive and practical Gen. Leslie Richard Groves Jr. and the sensitive and philosophical physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer of the Manhattan Project, says J. Richard Hackman, a professor of social and organizational psychology at Harvard University. Otherwise, the arrangement could deteriorate into a struggle for dominance.

Don’t upstage your counterpart. At Farmer Bros., only one of its two chief executives could sit on the board. Patrick Criteser agreed that the seat should go to Jeffrey Wahba. “It’s incumbent on me to treat him like we’re sharing the board seat and to make him feel like he’s got half that vote,” Wahba says.

Maintain a united front. At Primerica Inc., the senior leadership team reports jointly to the co-CEOs. “People know that to deal with an issue, particularly a big issue, they have to deal with the John aspect of it and they have to deal with the Rick aspect of it,” says co-CEO John Addison, who focuses on marketing while Rick Williams focuses on operations and finances. “They can’t come to either of us and say, ‘The other guy is being a twit.’ “

Build a relationship before sharing leadership. Entrepreneurs Russell D’Souza and Jack Groetzinger were friends at Dartmouth College before starting SeatGeek, a New York City-based company that forecasts ticket prices for sports and music events. “It’s really important that when you pick someone to work together, you know a lot about them,” D’Souza says. “You make the decision consciously, weighing the strengths and weaknesses of the person in mind.”

Posted on November 5, 2011August 8, 2018

Patagonia Fills Payroll With People Who Are Passionate

Patagonia Inc. CEO Casey Sheahan, still dressed in a cycling jersey and shorts from a lunchtime ride, chats with the human resources director in the lobby of the outdoor clothing and equipment company’s headquarters in Ventura, California. The space, with its Douglas fir staircase and portrait of Yosemite’s El Capitan, feels more reminiscent of a national park lodge than the gateway to a $400 million retailer. At the foot of the stairs stands a door that leads to the company cafe, which serves organic food and drinks. Today’s special: free-range organic barbecue chicken. One of the cafe’s windows looks into the infant and toddler child-care room, whose walls are adorned with art made by employees’ children.

More than 3,000 miles from headquarters, Betsy Pantazelos wraps up a day at the Patagonia store on Newbury Street in Boston. The interior, with its schoolhouse lights and wooden mezzanine, echoes the headquarters’ lodgelike feel. That environment, along with the corporate philosophy and culture behind it, explains why Pantazelos started working there four years ago while in graduate school and has stayed, rising from floor leader to store manager.

“This is a group of people who not only work together, but they play together, too,” she says. “As a result, people stay around longer because they feel supported and understood. The company offers every individual employee a lot of empowerment, and that’s very unusual in retail.”

Perennially recognized as a good workplace for mothers, Patagonia also has earned a reputation for employee loyalty at a time when other apparel retailers commonly see turnover of more than 100 percent annually, according to independent management consultant Robert Bartlett, who has worked in the retailing industry for 35 years. Patagonia had 25 percent combined voluntary and involuntary turnover in its U.S. brick-and-mortar stores as of the 12 months ended in July. Turnover was 7 percent at its headquarters and 6 percent at its distribution center in Reno, Nevada. Those numbers have remained stable during the past 12 years, despite the U.S. economy’s crests and falls.

The industry average in 2010 for all retail was 43.8 percent, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Retail Federation.

Lifestyle retailers—whether they sell bikes or surfboards—tend to attract employees who love that lifestyle and often stay longer. Still, Harry Friedman, CEO of retail consulting firm the Friedman Group, characterizes Patagonia’s turnover as an unusually good number. “We’d love it at 25 percent,” he says.

Billy Smith, an avid surfer, joined the company four years ago. On days with good swells, he’ll awake at 5 a.m. to test products. “Landing this job was probably the best thing that ever happened to me,” says Smith, 26, a product developer for wet suits and surfing gear. “I feel like I represent the brand as much as it represents me.”

Sheahan, who became CEO in 2006, credits the low turnover to the corporate culture, camaraderie and the company’s “ambitious, authentic mission statement, which is very meaningful to our employees.” That statement: “Build the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis.”

“They know what they do each day is contributing towards a higher purpose—protecting and preserving the areas that most of them love spending time in,” Sheahan says.

Patagonia grew out of Chouinard Equipment, a supplier of climbing tools. In the 1970s, founder Yvon Chouinard began selling rugby shirts and shorts made of lawn-furniture fabric. The durable clothes proved popular, and he and wife, Malinda, spun off Patagonia in 1973.

The 1980s brought compound annual growth of as much as 50 percent. But amid the recession of the early 1990s came what employees called “Black Wednesday”: the only large-scale layoffs in company history. Since then, the company has followed a strategy of slow growth. Still privately owned by the Chouinards, Patagonia does not need to please Wall Street and shareholders and can therefore create a culture and mission that aren’t so tightly bound to the bottom line.

Long before much of corporate America embraced “green business,” Patagonia was creating clothes from recycled soda bottles and installing solar panels at its corporate campus. One percent of sales goes to support environmental not-for-profits. Every Patagonia store has an environmental grants budget, and local employees take pride in deciding who gets what.

You can track the environmental impact of more than 150 products on The Footprint Chronicles, an interactive microsite. Select “down sweater” and you’ll read “the good,” “the bad” and the company’s spin through “what we think,” which says Patagonia needs to find a consistent supply of goose down from birds that the company can verify have been treated humanely.

“I really never thought that I’d be in retail,” says Maureen Kent, manager of the outlet store in Salt Lake City, who says she was a ski bum until she turned 38. “But I love the environmental stance Patagonia takes. And I love the fact that we get to give money back to our local organizations.”

The company also lends its talent to green groups. After one year of service, employees can apply for two-month internships with environmental not-for-profits during which time they’re still paid by Patagonia.

Bartlett says Patagonia employees may feel more connected to the company because of their “higher calling.” “Count me a skeptic,” he says, “but they think they’re saving the world.”

At the headquarters, an easy one-block walk from the Pacific Ocean, employees lean their surfboards against a wall near the cafe and break from work to catch waves. Restrooms include showers to freshen up after jogging, biking or even playing volleyball.

No one has private offices. Employees wear headphones to signal that they can’t be disturbed. Guests are obvious because they’re the only ones in traditional business attire.

Val Franco, one of the first employees hired, left in 1976 and then returned in 1985. “What’s cool about this place is the culture,” Franco says. “We have this amazing day care and there are parents who are like-minded helping you raise your children, so it’s sort of a village.”

To help sustain the retailer’s culture, every new hire receives a copy of Chouinard’s book Let My People Go Surfing, which charts Patagonia’s history and philosophies. New workers also are introduced at quarterly meetings, open to all employees, where executives review the financials. After all, employees may receive bonuses linked to their performance, responsibility and salary if the company meets or exceeds goals, financial or otherwise.

“We know what we’re doing by generating revenue for this enterprise is helping preserve the environment, and that’s really important to a lot of us,” says Lu Setnicka, director of human resources. “But we don’t want to go out of business doing the right thing. We still have to remain profitable.”

Indeed, Bartlett, the consultant, says, “Being fond of the outdoors and being next to the bears and so on is not a qualification to be a successful sales associate in the stores. The two things may be in opposition.”

To boost employee morale, which often can lead to success, the company encourages celebrations. In Reno, a group known as the Fun Patrol organizes parties throughout the year. And the outlet store in Salt Lake City closed for an entire Wednesday in August. Instead of selling merchandise, the staff brought paddle boards, kayaks and bocce ball sets to the nearby Jordanelle Reservoir for what they called a “field day,” a company tradition.

Setnicka coaches managers to define expectations, communicate deadlines and then trust their staffs with freedom to figure out when and how to meet those deadlines. “That doesn’t mean you leave them floundering,” she says. “You have a responsibility to check in and see how they’re doing.”

Providing benefits such as two months of fully paid leave to new parents and flexible hours enhances employee engagement, which leads to more satisfied employees, Setnicka says.

“When you walk through the front door here, you don’t have to shed part of who you are,” says Setnicka, whose son also works for the company. “For some organizations, that’s unfortunately what you have to do. You have to leave behind your role as an activist or your role as an athlete or your role as a parent. At Patagonia, when you come through that front door, every aspect of you is celebrated.” However, Setnicka acknowledges that this flexibility varies by project and role. “Someone who works in a retail store can’t say, ‘I think we’ll open the store at noon today,’ ” she says. “There are certain hours of operation.”

But retail employees such as Bruce Livingstone, who works at the company’s flagship store in Ventura, says the company has provided flexibility when they needed it most. When a family member fell ill, Livingstone wanted to return to the East Coast. It was a stark difference from his experience working for other retailers. “The company was very flexible and said, ‘Take whatever time you need,’ ” Livingstone recalls. “They do what’s right and worry about the bottom line after the fact. It just reinforced the reason why I’m here.”

Workforce Management, November 2011, pgs. 6, 8 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on October 21, 2011August 8, 2018

Teacher Alleges Retaliation by School District for Giving Newspaper Interview

According to a lawsuit filed Oct. 14 in a Brooklyn federal district court, Rebecca Posteraro, a third-year music teacher at the Bellerose Avenue Elementary School in East Northport, New York, broke her leg on Feb. 15, minutes before the curtain was to rise on the opening night of a school musical she was co-directing. Despite the injury, Posteraro stayed to see her cast through to the end of the show.

During the show, Barbara Falotico, the school’s principal, called an ambulance to take Posteraro to the hospital, but then realized she would have to miss the end of the production, the lawsuit alleges. Agreeing to let Posteraro finish the show, Falotico instructed an emergency operator to forget the request, saying that she would call back later, according to court documents.

The next week, both women were interviewed by a Newsday newspaper reporter about the night’s events. The article, published Feb. 20 and titled “Music Teacher Breaks Leg, Stays for Play,” detailed Posteraro’s efforts to remain on hand during the production in spite of the pain, according to court documents.

When she returned to work eight days later, Posteraro learned that Falotico and Northport-East Northport School District Superintendent Marylou McDermott had decided to deny her tenure because they interpreted the Newsday article as criticism of the school’s “failure to insist on Posteraro being taken immediately to the hospital,” according to court documents.

During the next two months, Posteraro claims in her lawsuit that she was retaliated against repeatedly for giving the interview. Falotico allegedly reprimanded Posteraro personally for talking to the reporter, despite having done so herself, court documents note.

On March 30, Posteraro alleges that she was forced to sign an inaccurate and misleading teacher evaluation. A week later, she discovered that her personnel file had been “pilfered” and that “all of the positive documentation had been removed,” according to court documents. On May 18, a few days before the school’s spring concert, she was told she would be fired at the end of the school year.

Posteraro also claims that another teacher, Izzet Mergen, and Falotico defamed her by telling parents who complained about her firing that they would “understand and agree” with the district’s decision if they “knew all the details,” leaving them to deduce that she had committed a serious infraction.

Calls to McDermott’s office seeking comment were not returned.

Posteraro has asked that the district’s actions be removed from her teaching record and is seeking back pay and additional compensatory damages.

Matt Dunning writes for Business Insurance, a sister publication of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on October 17, 2011August 8, 2018

Nesco Affiliate Acquires DePasquale Staffing

DPSS, an affiliate of Nesco Resource, announced Oct. 17 that it acquired DePasquale Staffing Services in Williamsport, Pennsylvania. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

“DePasquale Staffing has a long-standing reputation for providing quality service to their dedicated clients, and we are excited to welcome them into our growing organization,” said Tim McPherson, president and COO of Nesco Resource. “The city of Williamsport and the surrounding Lycoming County area show great promise for Nesco Resource, with the expanding job market throughout the region.”

“It was a pleasure to find an acquirer with similar corporate culture and spirit to that of DePasquale Staffing Services. Nesco Resource is a fast-growing leader within the staffing industry, with very strong financial backing, stability and tenure” said Peter DePasquale, the founder of DePasquale Staffing.

Nesco Resource ranked as No. 52 on Workforce Management sister company Staffing Industry Analysts’ 2011 list of the largest U.S. staffing firms, and No.16 on Staffing Industry Analysts’ list of largest engineering staffing firms. This is Nesco’s fourth acquisition this year.

Staffing Industry Analysts is a sister company of Workforce Management. To comment, email editors@workforce.com.

Stay informed and connected. Get human resources news and HR features via Workforce Management’s Twitter feed or RSS feeds for mobile devices and news readers.

Posted on October 5, 2011August 8, 2018

Video Interviewing Cuts Costs, but Bias Worries Linger

As an executive recruiter for 17 years, Amy Rueda has tried most every form of technology to find the best talent.

Starting in the profession when paper résumés and face-to-face interviews were the norm, Rueda, director of strategic talent management for UCLA Development, adopted videoconferencing when it became popular in the 1990s. She soon discovered that although videoconferencing cut travel expenses and was more convenient, it was pricey since it required specialized equipment and location.

It took her nearly a decade to find the technology that offered the right balance of convenience and cost. After being appointed to her position at UCLA in 2007, Rueda knew she had to implement video interviews as a key part of the university’s recruiting strategy. But finding the right fit took time, as well.

She spent a year researching her options and testing products before finally selecting GreenJobInterview, based in Costa Mesa, California, in 2008. The company’s product promised to be secure, affordable and required no special equipment beyond a webcam, a feature that is built into many new computers. Since incorporating online interviews, Rueda says she has cut spending from about $10,000 per search to roughly $500.

“The technology of interviewing candidates has come a long, long way, and video interviewing is one of the most useful tools recruiters have at their disposal,” Rueda said.

With the economy still struggling and companies having to do more with less money, this type of savings—time, money and resources—is considered substantial. According to a soon-to-be published report by Mollie Lombardi, research director of consulting firm Aberdeen Group, video interviews are gaining popularity.

In a survey of 506 companies, cost was a motivator for companies to adopt the technology, with 67 percent citing the reduction of travel expenses as a draw for them. Forty-seven percent use video interviewing to shorten the time it takes to make a hire, and 22 percent say that they would use video interviewing to help them reach candidates from other geographic regions.

While the technology is cheaper and more efficient, it’s a method that some love and others contend is rife with legal land mines. Video interviewing technology may be useful and financially beneficial, but employment lawyer John Chun with the Summit Law Group in Seattle advises clients to proceed with caution when using it.

“Video résumés are not necessarily riskier than face-to-face interviews, but a talking head on a video does offer more information about a candidate than even a photograph might,” he said. “A video can give the viewer clues to the candidate’s class, race, nationality and can also potentially reveal any disability the candidate might have.”

Chun suggests adopting a screening process that requires the use of a paper or electronic résumé as the first tier of consideration before video is introduced. Whether it is on the beginning or end of the hiring process, he said companies need to create a set of objective qualities, like education, experience, writing samples, references and test results so that if candidates are rejected, there is a reason.

He also recalls a time when attaching photographs to a résumé was discouraged because of the potential for discrimination.

“As people get more comfortable presenting themselves on video, virtual interviews are going to become the norm,” he says. “I don’t think it can be stopped. It matters more now how companies are going to deal with it and what steps they can take to protect themselves.”

While Chun sees the potential for problems, to the best of his knowledge, no lawsuits have been filed that involve discrimination related to video interviewing.

Colleen Aylward, an executive recruiter and creator of the video interviewing tool Interview Studio, was an early adopter of the technology. As founder of the executive recruiting firm Devon James Associates Inc., based in Bellevue, Washington, Aylward felt the pushback, too.

“Hiring managers, like it or not, are human, and people worried that they might make judgment calls on a candidate based on what the person looked like,” she said. “The other side of the argument is that the only reason you bring a candidate in for an interview in the first place is to see how they speak, how they carry themselves and whether they will be a match for your company’s culture. We argue that rather than have a candidate travel for a face-to-face interview, these same observations can be made through a short video clip.”

Video interviewing vendors began popping up in the mid-2000s in response to the cost of videoconferencing and the headache of travel. Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, recruiters would normally fly into a city and interview local candidates in airport lounges. That became impossible when airport security laws stopped allowing nonticketed parties past security.

Greg Rokos, who co-founded GreenJobInterview in 2007, was among those who saw the post-Sept. 11 recruiting issues as a business opportunity. An executive recruiter for 20 years, Rokos—like Rueda—had experienced the inefficiencies of job interviews.

“In my practice, I was amazed by the waste surrounding first-round interviews,” he said.

In addition to the cost of flights, hotels and meals for candidates who often were not a good fit for the company, Rokos was bothered by the environmental impact of the practice. Videoconferencing, he said, was problematic for different reasons.

“While it was more convenient than flying, there were drawbacks—namely that the candidate had to travel to a videoconferencing center, which sometimes took hours depending on where they lived,” Rokos said.

In addition to the expense—up to $500 an hour—the technology didn’t allow for multiple connection points, so executives from various branches couldn’t sit in on a single interview. And, since most videoconferencing centers were merely hosting the interview and were not the actual provider of the video transmission, technical support was lacking.

“I saw a dramatic need for improvement in video technology specific to job interviews,” Rokos said.

While GreenJobInterview provides real-time virtual interviews, companies like Active Interview, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, allow organizations to utilize video interviewing in other ways. Asynchronous interviews—interviews that are recorded by the candidate, then viewed later by the recruiter or HR representative—allow companies to sidestep the problem of scheduling multiple preliminary interviews by allowing the candidate to record their responses to a series of preset questions.

Companies can create custom questionnaires, and those questions are presented to the candidate on their computer screen. The candidate then presses the record button to tape a response.

Sandeep Ghael, co-founder of Active Interview, says there are benefits to using this tool in the recruiting process.

“The candidate can do the video at their leisure, and the company can view their responses when it is convenient,” he said. “It makes the process more collaborative because an entire team can view the same video and score them, rate them and share them with each other.”

While some contend that video interviewing could open the door to a lawsuit, UCLA’s Rueda says it’s an unnecessary worry.

“I think people who argue that this tool can be used to discriminate are the biggest hypocrites to walk the earth. It is an argument that doesn’t hold water,” Rueda says. “If you are an organization that is inclined to discriminate, you are going to do it whether it is in a video interview or in person. If you are not an organization that is inclined to discriminate, you are going to be looking for attributes that are key to the placement.

“We are in a time where we all have to strive to be our best while being very careful with our resources and how we use them. Video interviewing is an amazing money-saving and time-saving tool.”

Posted on September 26, 2011August 8, 2018

Successful Staffing Strategies

  • Make sure the staffing partner has an adequate balance sheet. Given the relatively low barriers to entry, it is too common to see companies struggle financially.
  • Be sure the staffing partner has sufficient size and financial resources to manage the contract. Sourcing 100 or more contract workers on an ongoing basis requires a very different type of staffing organization than providing two or three temps at a time.
  • Visit the local office of the staffing company as part of the due-diligence process, especially for large projects, to make sure the operation meets expectations.
  • Give your staffing partner feedback on all candidates that you review to help refine the recruiting strategy, and make it easier to find the best candidates.
  • Be open-minded about “teachable” candidates, especially for hard-to-fill skill sets. Candidates who are a strong cultural fit and possess transferable skills are likely to succeed and thrive with some training and support.
  • Provide enough training, rewards and feedback to keep temps engaged and motivated. One employer notes that small rewards—a free lunch for good performance, for example—go a long way toward winning the loyalty of temps.
  • Beware of unfair negative stereotypes about the quality of temp workers. Temps can be—and often are—as qualified as full-time employees, and their skills can be equally useful.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 … Page 35 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress