Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Technology

Posted on July 22, 2009August 31, 2018

Democrats, Republicans Seek to Add Biometrics to E-Verify

Immigration reform typically creates discord within and between parties and interest groups, but Democrats and Republicans are hitting the same note about work-site enforcement as the latest congressional push gets under way.


At a Senate subcommittee hearing Tuesday, July 21, leaders of both parties supported establishing an electronic employment verification system that includes a biometric mechanism to combat identity fraud.


Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York and chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on immigration, said improving employment verification is critical to boosting public confidence about curbing illegal immigration, which will build support for comprehensive immigration reform.


He hopes to introduce broad legislation this fall. At the hearing, Schumer outlined criteria for an employment verification system that he would include in the bill.


At the top of the 10-point list was the requirement that the system “must authenticate the employee’s identity by using a specific and unique biometric identifier,” such as a fingerprint. He said that giving workers PIN numbers or security codes would not suffice.


Schumer’s primary criticism of the current government-run electronic verification system, E-Verify, is that it is unable to stop ID theft. Companies using E-Verify have been subject to work-site raids because employees have stolen information from actual citizens.


“E-Verify … is an example of a halfhearted and flawed system,” Schumer said. “Simply put, it is not difficult for illegal workers to scam the system by providing the personal information of a legal worker.”


E-Verify compares new hire information from I-9 forms against Social Security, Department of Homeland Security and other government databases. A wide spectrum of critics—including the Society for Human Resource Management—call the system inaccurate and inefficient.


Mike Aytes, acting deputy director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, defended E-Verify. He said the system, which is used on a voluntary basis by more than 137,000 employers, instantly verifies 96.9 percent of new-hire queries. Only 0.3 percent of non-confirmations are successfully contested, Aytes said.


As part of a crackdown on employers, the homeland agency has moved to make E-Verify mandatory for federal contractors.


The agency wants to enhance E-Verify by enabling it to access driver’s license photos. But Aytes acknowledged that the system is vulnerable to identity theft.


In addition to a biometric dimension, Schumer said an effective verification system must apply to citizens and non-citizens, require minimal compliance costs for businesses and exonerate employers from liability if they use the system but severely fine or prosecute them if they knowingly hire illegal workers.


Schumer also said workers should be able to keep their jobs while correcting information in the system and that it would contain strong privacy protections.


“A system with these 10 characteristics will be easier to use, less discriminatory, tougher and more effective than the current E-Verify system,” Schumer said.


Schumer’s focus on biometrics was endorsed by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas and the ranking Republican on the subcommittee. He recommended a “secure, tamper-proof and easily verifiable card” as proof of employment eligibility.


Another Republican, who is a leading proponent of cracking down on illegal immigration, questioned whether a biometric system could overcome opposition on the left and right to an identity card.


“Count me a skeptic,” said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Alabama. “Show me how this will actually work.”


Sessions is among the strongest proponents of E-Verify. An amendment he wrote that would make it permanent was added to a Senate homeland appropriations bill. Authorization for E-Verify runs out September 30. The House version of the measure contains a two-year reauthorization. The measures are now being negotiated.


Democrats raised questions about E-Verify. Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wisconsin, pointed to a 2006 study by the Social Security inspector general showing there are 17.8 million errors in the agency’s database. That could lead to millions of workers being mistakenly ruled ineligible for work, Feingold said.


Aytes dismissed the criticism.


“The E-Verify program has made great strides in becoming a fast, easy and more accurate tool to help employers and workers,” he said. “The administration is dedicated to continuing to make improvements to address issues such as usability, fraud and discrimination.”


—Mark Schoeff Jr.


Workforce Management’s online news feed is now available via Twitter.


 

Posted on February 2, 2007June 29, 2023

IDEO: The Innovation Factory

IDEO began as a place where fun-loving, brainy engineers invented products ranging from stand-up toothpaste tubes to high-tech blood analyzers. But in the past 15 years, the Palo Alto, California, company has morphed into an innovation factory where the corporate elite from places like Procter & Gamble, Kaiser Permanente and mMode at AT&T Wireless Services flock to participate in projects and brainstorming sessions with IDEO designers, engineers and social scientists. The company ranked No. 15 on Boston Consulting Group’s 2006 list of the 25 most innovative companies in the world.

Here, on a small campus down the street from Stanford University, is the company that has been variously described as wildly creative and collaborative, contagiously dynamic, open and intense, iconoclastic and slightly zany, flexible and flat as a pancake—the world’s top honchos come to learn how to fundamentally rewire their companies for innovation, from product design to developing a creative mind-set throughout an organization.

technology and talent
Tech and talent drive IDEO.

With about $80 million in sales and 450 employees, the firm may seem like small potatoes. But it has grown at a consistent rate of 20 percent per year for the past five years, and its global influence is huge. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January 2006, IDEO chief executive Tim Brown played a starring role in helping top execs rethink their approach to problem-solving and to developing creative environments.

At a time when creativity and innovation are the driving forces of the new economy, as well as the old one, senior managers throughout organizations turn to IDEO to learn how to foster creativity by developing cultures that are founded on breaking rules, building teamwork and stimulating the free expression of ideas. IDEO general manager Tom Kelley, author of the book The Ten Faces of Innovation, talks about managing people inside a veritable innovation factory:

Workforce Management: How specifically do you at IDEO find employees with the skills needed today to help create new workplace cultures to support innovation?

Tom Kelley: Several years ago, I had responsibility for HR at IDEO, and was always conscious that our ability to continuously recruit new talent was crucial to the ongoing success of the firm. We tend to think of the recruiting journey as having two separable components—attraction and selection.

Attraction: Nobel laureate Linus Pauling once said that the way to get a good idea is start with a lot of ideas, and of course the same applies to getting good people. After IDEO got named as one of the best small companies to work for in America [by Inc. magazine], word seemed to get out, and attraction has never been an issue since.

So I’d say our experience at IDEO suggests that the attraction component goes well beyond the traditional scope of an HR role, and is broadly influenced by the company’s overall reputation, its brand and its relationship to the surrounding community.

Selection: When I joined the firm, selection was much simpler than it is today, because back then we were searching mainly for product designers who combined a humanistic orientation with a technical background. My brother David [founder of IDEO] was teaching in a two-year master’s program on product design at Stanford University that was graduating small groups of bright, creative “renaissance” engineers who we found to be perfectly suited to do innovative work.

Having seen their project work for two years, my brother knew those students very well, and when they started applying to our firm, he had more data available than can be ever be gleaned from the traditional recruitment interview. In fact, I’m not sure there were any sessions with prospective employees in that first decade of the firm that would be recognizable as job interviews, because my brother hired people he already knew pretty well—myself very much included.

Selection today is a bit more complex, partly because of the diversity of talent we are looking for, but we remain acutely aware of the limitations of a 60-minute hiring interview. We try to compensate for the relatively low-bandwidth communication of a traditional interview by doing lots of interviews before making a hiring decision—often using groups of IDEO people talking to a candidate in the same session—so that typically a dozen people may have talked to them before we make an offer.

That way, we triangulate on whether they will be a good fit at IDEO, and the IDEO team has a sense that they were broadly consulted on who will be joining their team.

WM: How does the strategy for innovation work at IDEO?

Kelley: IDEO has been practicing innovation throughout its history. Some of the key ingredients in that recipe for innovation are:

  1. A human-centered approach that ties innovation to customers’ underlying needs—even the psychological or emotional needs that are not immediately apparent and that customers themselves may not articulate.
  2. A belief in the value of quick prototyping, the kind of experimentation that usually has relevant learning attached.
  3. Heavy use of brainstorming as an engine for idea generation and a way to tap into the collective knowledge of the organization.

  WM: Please describe the culture at IDEO.

    Kelley: The culture is very deep at IDEO, and very nuanced. I’ll highlight a few characteristics:

  1. An intense intellectual curiosity. From the moment I joined the firm almost 20 years ago to the present day, I have always enjoyed the voracious appetite for new information and new ideas at IDEO. Stanford professor Bob Sutton, who studied IDEO quite extensively several years ago, described it as “an attitude of wisdom,” a healthy balance between knowing things and distrusting what you know that encourages continued curiosity.
  2. An abundance mentality. Since demand for IDEO’s services has exceeded our supply during much of the firm’s history, there is a healthy interest in doing the right projects, as opposed to doing whatever comes along. So both at an individual level and for the firm as a whole, we are looking for innovation programs that offer a good “fit” with our interests and capabilities. I believe that abundance mentality also results in a people who are generous in sharing ideas with other team members.
  3. An inherent restlessness. The culture does not tend to “leave well enough alone.” If you deeply believe that anything can be made better, then you tend to tinker with things a lot. So at IDEO, we are constantly tinkering with our methodologies, our offerings, our structure and even our workplace. I am sure a good accountant would tell us that we should keep every new office configuration, every new piece of furniture or equipment until it is fully depreciated, but that doesn’t tend to happen at IDEO.
  4. A vitality that manifests itself in the group being relatively fit. From the ongoing “boot camp” fitness programs to the 24-hour bike ride competitions to the pre-work surfing groups, the average IDEO person is pretty active.

    WM: What can HR executives learn from IDEO?

    Kelley: In my book, I tried to capture the key elements of IDEO’s approach to innovation. I could have chosen to focus on creative tools or techniques, but instead created a framework around the people of innovation.

    One intent of the book is to help teams and individuals go beyond doing innovation and start being the innovators. I believe this people-based strategy relates directly to human resources throughout an organization. There’s not a role called “the human resources manager,” but in a way, the whole book is about HR.

    WM: What does HR in the areas of hiring, retention, leadership and cultural development and training mean at IDEO?

    Kelley: Our founder may have been an engineer, but the founding principles of the firm were all about HR. Back in 1978, when hatching the firm that became IDEO, my brother told me two of the defining characteristics for the new enterprise: First, he said, he mainly just wanted a place where you could work with your friends. Second, he wanted a place where no one had a boss’ boss.

    The “work with your friends” rule is still in full swing, in a firm with more than its share of parties, and a very active social life. One telling indicator of how well people get along is that when IDEO has leadership meetings, bringing in managers from around the world to the San Francisco Bay Area, we routinely host them overnight in our homes. I have had several guests at my house over the years from IDEO’s locations like Chicago, Boston, London and Munich.

    An acquaintance of mine who works for the federal government finds this arrangement “creepy,” but it seems perfectly natural because of the natural friendships within the firm, and of course it is purely voluntary on both sides. If we didn’t enjoy doing it, we would have stopped long ago.

    And when we did our first-ever firm-wide meeting of all 350 people a few years back, we hosted more than 100 visitors in the homes of Bay Area people [no one stayed in a hotel those nights]. It was great fun, and a memorable event in the history of the firm.

    The “boss’ boss” rule is maintained today as the minimization of hierarchy. In an idea-friendly environment, you want to minimize the amount of corporate posturing associated with trying to guess what answer the boss is hoping for. I am not saying that IDEO people lack respect for authority, exactly; just that they are prone to speak their mind, regardless of whether there’s a “boss” in the room.

    WM: What companies have best implemented IDEO’s innovative strategies?

    Kelley: I am not sure that I would characterize them as having implemented our strategies per se, but there are dozens of client companies where I think we have helped add fuel to their engine of innovation. Procter & Gamble under CEO A.G. Lafley has strengthened their culture, quickened their pace of product development and doubled their stock price in recent years.

    PepsiCo under Steve Reinemund [who announced his retirement as CEO in August 2006] diversified their portfolio way beyond carbonated soft drinks and created a bundle of new better-for-you products that enabled the market capitalization of PepsiCo to pass the market cap of Coke for the first time [in December 2005].

    Among smaller organizations, Phil Newbold at Memorial Hospital and Health System [in South Bend, Indiana] has nurtured a culture of innovation at his hospital.

    WM: What specific “how to” steps did you use at IDEO for fostering creativity when the company was founded? How have you sustained innovation over the years?

    Kelley: Since my brother never wrote anything down—though I did much later, of course—most of those steps were implicitly leading by example, rather than having explicit policies or procedures. Smart team members are really quick to read an organizational culture and figure out what kinds of behaviors are encouraged versus those that are frowned upon.

    For example, it was clear from the beginning that good-natured humor—even poking fun at the boss—was a part of the culture, but that ridiculing people for a “stupid” idea was not. And the absence of hierarchy I mentioned earlier was a part of it too. From the very beginning, IDEO was an idea-friendly environment.

    WM: At IDEO, how specifically do you identify the types of people who keep an organization creative?

    Kelley: In my book, I’ve identified 10 specific roles people have available to them, and all a manager has to do is give team members an opportunity to explore their aptitude for those roles. So, for example, if you think that someone on your team is very bright and has latent or underdeveloped talents for teaching others, simply give them a chance.

    Next time they are going to an interesting conference or taking an international trip, maybe to visit one of your other offices, ask them to share the most interesting things they learned in an informal follow-up lunch session with their colleagues.

    Basically, you’re setting up an advanced form of the show-and-tell we all did in kindergarten. But doing so has three potential benefits. First, the person will pay closer attention when they are out of the office. They will learn more themselves, because they know they will be sharing the insights later.
Second, if they are any good at the sharing process, the rest of the team who stayed at the office will get some new insights during lunch.

    Third, and most important, you will get a sense of whether you were right, whether this person who you know to be bright is also good at transferring their knowledge to others.

    So you have created a little experiment, and if it is successful you have identified a “cross-pollinator” for your innovation team.

    If it fails, as many experiments do, then you can always try a new experiment with a different team member or nurture one of the other “faces of innovation.”

    WM: How does your own company strategy improve the bottom line and give you an advantage over your competition?

    Kelley: We tend to spend more time worrying about our clients’ bottom line than our own. But having said that, I am sure our CFO would tell you that IDEO has had pretty solid performance in the past couple of decades and is a healthy firm today. You may have seen the annual Boston Consulting Group/Wharton survey results on the world’s most innovative companies. Every company on that list gains value from the innovation momentum they have built up within their organizations.

    That innovation premium shows up in the stock price of the publicly traded companies, in their top-line growth and in their profit margins. In the long run, one of the biggest benefits of such innovation momentum may be in attracting bright, creative people who want to keep the innovations rolling along.

Posted on September 29, 2006March 8, 2019

Hurd Tells Congress HP Way Can Be Restored

recruiting technology

It took more than seven hours before a congressional hearing on spying by Hewlett-Packard got around to a discussion about the impact of the scandal on employees.

A day that featured 10 former HP executives and security consultants exercising their constitutional right to decline to testify and the relentless grilling of former HP chairwoman Patricia Dunn concluded with a query from Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, about the company’s outreach to its workers.

“We’ve made an effort to communicate with them as often as possible,” HP chief executive Mark Hurd replied to Burgess, whose district includes an HP facility. “We’ve communicated with them about our governance changes and the issues around the investigation.”

Hurd was the last witness in a hearing of a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on September 28 that lasted from 10 a.m. until nearly 6 p.m. The panel delved into the unfolding drama surrounding HP’s efforts to ferret out boardroom press leaks about company strategy.

The investigation involved HP’s obtaining phone records and other personal information about board members, journalists and its own staff through clandestine methods, including the use of false identities, or “pretexting.”

Even as HP tries to recover, lingering concerns about corporate spying may become an issue for employers.

“Every company in America is examining itself to see if it has the same kind of problem,” says Nell Minow, editor of the Corporate Library, an independent research firm in Arlington, Virginia, that specializes in corporate governance.

Congress may also take up the issue. “This gives us a good opportunity to open the window on some of the practices going on in companies around the country,” said Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colorado.

HP, which has built a reputation as an exemplar of ethical corporate behavior, may now find itself lumped with other rogue companies, according to Rep. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisconsin.

Enron and WorldCom shook American’s confidence in the finance and accounting arena. “HP is shattering their expectation of telecom privacy,” Baldwin said during the hearing.

The company’s employees may have similar concerns, which could even outweigh the fretting about damage to HP’s brand. “It’s not the reputation issue; it’s the paranoia issue,” Minow says.

House members on both sides of the aisle spent the first hour and 15 minutes of the hearing castigating the company with variations on the same theme: What were you thinking?

Hurd apologized for HP’s behavior and said that he is ultimately “responsible for everything that goes on at Hewlett-Packard.”

Although he admitted to approving the content of a bogus e-mail to a journalist, which was intended to monitor her sources, Hurd said that he ignored the scope and tactics of the investigation.

In part, he blamed the demands of running a huge company. “A CEO cannot be the backstop for every process in the company,” he said. “I pick my spots when I dive for details. There’s no excuse for that.”

But at the end–perhaps because the questioners were exhausted after working over Dunn and others–Hurd was both unbloodied and unbowed.

“We are committed to our core to redefine our company in a way that not only we can be proud of, but in a way that all corporations in America can be proud of,” he said.

—Mark Schoeff Jr.

 

Posted on September 18, 2003July 10, 2018

Picking the Right Assessment Tools

With so many different types of assessment tools available, deciding whichones to use can be confusing. Is it better to use background checks, talentmeasures, or structured interviews? Are drug screens better than knowledge testsor job simulations? In general, the answer is “it depends.”

    There is no single “best” type of assessment tool. Assuming they areappropriately designed and administered, all of the major types of assessmenttools can effectively predict future candidate behavior. Appropriate use of anywell-designed assessment tool will substantially improve a company’s bottomline. The challenge is to determine which assessment tools will have thegreatest impact, given your company’s particular needs. Here are some generalguidelines to help you figure out which assessment tool is best for you.


Understanding what you’re trying to predict
    The first step in choosing an assessment tool is to determine what yourspecific needs are. This means understanding and clearly outlining what kind ofperformance you want to predict.


    For instance, if theft is the most important issue affecting organizationalperformance, then you should look at assessment tools specifically designed toidentify candidates who are likely to steal. These might include backgroundchecks or integrity tests. If customer service has the greatest impact onrevenue, then consider job simulations designed to assess candidates’ abilityto handle difficult customer interactions or talent measures that assesscandidates’ interpersonal style.


    This table summarizes the effectiveness of various assessment tools forpredicting different kinds of job performance. It can be used as a general guidein trying to determine what types of assessment tools to consider.


Qualification Screens Structured Interviews Job Simulations Knowledge Tests Talent Measures Background Checks Drug Screens Physical Tests Integrity Tests Cultural Fitness
Attendance/ Reliability         x       x  
Tenure

x


      x       x

 x


Teamwork   x x   x          
Customer   Service    x x   x        
Learning and Adaptability     x   x          
Deviant  Behavior (theft, drug use, violence)         x x x   x  
Physical Performance               x    
Problem    Solving    x x   x          
Leadership    x x   x          
Motivation/ Work Ethic   x x   x       x  
Specialist Knowledge  x      x            

The importance of validation
    Whatever type of assessment tool you are considering, it is important that itbe validated. Validation is a process for testing and documenting theeffectiveness of an assessment tool in predicting job performance. Any vendoryou are considering should be able to provide detailed “validation” datademonstrating the effectiveness of its assessment instruments in predictingdifferent types of job performance.


    Validity data tends to be presented in two forms: percentages and validitycoefficients. Percentages show increases in the number of successful hires thatare associated with use of a specific assessment tool. For example, Unicruconducted research showing that employees hired with their assessment tools hadturnover rates that were 25 percent lower than those of employees hired withoutuse of these tools. Percentages are easy to interpret, but they demonstrate onlythe effectiveness of tools that predict highly objective kinds of performancesuch as turnover or sales volume.


    Validity coefficients show the effectiveness of assessment tools forpredicting less objective forms of performance such as customer service,problem-solving, or teamwork. Validity coefficients are an index of anassessment’s ability to predict performance. They range from 0, whichindicates no relationship between an assessment tool and job performance, to1.0, which indicates 100 percent accuracy.


    The table below provides some general guidelines for interpreting the meaningof different validity coefficients. The validity coefficients of well-designedassessment tools usually range from .15 to .60, with most falling between .20and .40. Beware of anyone claiming validity coefficients above .70, as thislevel is unrealistic for practical purposes.


Validity Coefficient Range Effectiveness of Assessment Tool
Below .10 Not useful, might as well flip a coin
.11 to .20 Possibly useful, depending on the circumstances.
.21 to .30  Useful
Above .30 Very useful

The advantages of using several tools
    It is important to remember that job success almost always depends on severaldifferent kinds of performance. For example, an employee who is very good atcustomer service will be of little value if he/she frequently misses work. Youcan increase the effectiveness of a selection system by combining assessmenttools that predict different types of job performance. For instance, combining apersonality test with an ability test can increase the overall predictiveability of your selection system by 20 percent or more. Adding one or twoadditional assessment tools can often significantly increase the ROI of yourstaffing processes.


    It is important to choose assessment tools that predict the various kinds ofperformance that are most critical to the job. As a general rule, it is good tofocus on having assessment tools that predict both what candidates “can do”and what they “will do.” This usually means having a mix of assessment toolsthat measure “hard skills” such as knowledge and problem-solving ability aswell as “soft skills” such as reliability and customer service.


    Of course, as long as it predicts a key area of performance, there is nothingwrong with using just one kind of assessment tool. However, hiring managers andrecruiters should be careful not to overly emphasize the kinds of performancepredicted by the tool at the expense of other factors that influence success.


    For example, if a test of knowledge or ability is used as the only assessmenttool, hiring managers may decide to hire only candidates who score in the toprange. While this will increase the likelihood of hiring good problem-solvers,it could decrease the number of hires who are likely to show high levels of workethic and reliability.


Workforce Online, December 2002 — Register Now!

Posted on July 16, 2001June 29, 2023

HRMS Integration Gets Easier

Over the last few years, technology has touched almostevery aspect of human resources. Computers and software now play an integralrole in managing processes — from benefits enrollment to recruiting and fromrecording time and attendance to administering retirement accounts. As enterpriserequirements have grown, HR systems have become more complex and more tightlyintegrated within organizations.

“The boundaries that previously separated departments are breaking down,” says Ian Turnbull, a systems consultant for ComputerSciences Corporation, Aurora, Ontario, Canada, and president of the InternationalAssociation for Human Resource Information Management. “Today, HR mustthink about how its systems can interact with the entire enterprise. The Web has completely changed the equation. It has allowed organizations to use data,and exchange it, in far more powerful ways.”

As enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and human resources managementsystem software have grown more complex, they’ve also become easier touse. Browsers and a Web interface have made software a click-and-point proposition.“It has reduced training requirements and fueled the trend toward employeeand managerial self-service,” Turnbull says.

The good news is that HR has a greater choice of powerfulsystems than ever before. The bad news is that “companies still sufferfrom a great deal of enlightened self-interest,” he notes. “Peopledon’t necessarily want to give up best-of-breed applications for an ERPpackage.” Helene Slowik, a consultant at Cedar in Chicago, says that finding“the right balance between what’s best for a department or a workgroup and what’s best for the enterprise can prove extremely challenging.”

What makes many of today’s add-on applications so attractive is the relative ease with which they can be integrated into a core ERP or HRMS. Over the last few years, the entire industry — including organizations such as SAP, PeopleSoft, Oracle, Lawson, Infinium, and Ultimate Software — has migrated toward systems that are more open and interchangeable.That, combined with the growing acceptance of application service providers(ASPs) — outside companies that manage systems and software remotely — hascreated new opportunities and challenges.

Slowik says that ASPs are ideal for small to medium-sizecompanies that cannot afford an extensive IT staff or the up-front capital tobuy high-end ERP and HRMS. “The predictable cost of such systems can beappealing,” she notes. However, many large companies are also finding theASP route desirable for niche applications. Not only can they get a system,such as recruiting, e-learning, or time and attendance, up to speed quickly,they also can later make changes more seamlessly. Meanwhile, most ERP vendors,including SAP, PeopleSoft, J.D. Edwards, and Lawson, have optimized their softwareto run under an ASP model.

The technology has also made it possible for organizationsto rethink structure and the way work gets done, says Al Doran, president ofPhenix Management International Inc., a Richmond Hill, Ontario, HR consultingfirm. While some companies, such as United Technologies, have embraced sharedservice centers that consolidate various functions into a single location ableto process transactions en masse, others, such as the Canadian Imperial Bankof Commerce, have completely outsourced HR.

On a practical level, HRMS and other enterprise systemsare changing the way human resource professionals work. They’re usheringin an array of new capabilities, including business intelligence, knowledge,and competency management. By gaining greater insight into organizational trends and patterns, it’s possible for human resources professionalsto become a key part of the corporate engine. Factoring in advanced work-flow and e-businesstools — including Web portals — adds value in ways that simply weren’tpossible only a few years ago.

One of the biggest challenges, for now, is connectingvarious systems and eliminating islands of automation. Although many HR departmentshave developed efficient practices in specific areas, the links between functionscontinue to break down. Paper and inefficient processes limit the overall gains,making it difficult to build a highly automated e-enterprise with cross-applicationcapabilities.

Another challenge is the fast pace at which systemschange. “Expertise in software and what constitutes best of breed is constantlychanging,” Turnbull says. Unless an organization — and HR department –is prepared to move quickly, an HRMS might never realize its full potential.What’s more, building a solid technology foundation and choosing a clear-cuttechnology path is essential. “You’re not just buying today’sversion of software, you’re buying a relationship with a company that shouldlast 5 to 10 years,” he adds.

Observers say that many companies have only begun toreap the harvest of enterprise systems. In the months and years ahead, the Webwill gain even greater stature. Mobile and wireless technologies will furtherextend the reach of HRMS. Work-flow and self-service capabilities will growfar more sophisticated. If HR is to flourish in this new corporate order, Slowiksays, it must partner with IT and other departments within the enterprise toforge new thinking. “Today, technology and business processes are tightlyintertwined, and HRMS is the glue that holds much of it together.”

Workforce,July 2001, p. 35 — SubscribeNow!

Posted on July 1, 1998September 22, 2020

What Exactly is Information Technology (IT)

AI in HR, artificial intelligence

Information technology is the study, design, development, implementation, support or management of computer-based information systems—particularly software applications and computer hardware. IT workers help ensure that computers work well for people.

Nearly every company, from a software design firm, to the biggest manufacturer, to the smallest “mom & pop” store, needs information technology workers to keep their businesses running smoothly, according to industry experts.

Most information technology jobs fall into four broad categories: computer scientists, computer engineers, systems analysts and computer programmers. HR managers responsible for recruiting IT employees increasingly must become familiar with the function and titles of the myriad job titles in demand today.

Some of them are listed below:

  • Database administration associate
  • Information systems operator/analyst
  • Interactive digital media specialist
  • Network specialist
  • Programmer/analyst
  • Software engineer
  • Technical support representative

SOURCE: “Building A Foundation for Tomorrow, Skill Standards for Information Technology.” NorthWest Center for Emerging Technologies, Bellevue Community College, Bellevue, Washington.

Workforce, July 1998, Vol. 77, No. 7, p. 53.

 

Looking to work in IT? Consider joining the workforce.com development team as we build the future of workforce technology. Email us on hr@workforce.com and mention this article.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 25 Page 26

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress