Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on February 9, 2007July 10, 2018

Return-to-Work Policy Challenged

Requiring a full medical release before allowing an employee to return to work may violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). That was the court’s decision in a lawsuit brought by Todd Wright against his former employer, Middle Tennessee Electrical Membership.


    Wright, who had suffered a serious work-related knee injury, alleged that the company failed to accommodate him and provide him with light duty work. His doctor had released him to work with restrictions, but the company’s policy precluded employees from returning to work until they had a full medical release. No offers of light duty employment were made by the company for two months, until Wright filed a discrimination charge with the EEOC.


    It was undisputed that the company would not consider an injured employee for any job until the employee had a full medical release. According to the court, requiring a full release from a medical doctor prior to returning to work might be tantamount to an impermissible “100 percent healed policy,” which violates ADA.


    In ordering a trial on Wright’s claims under the ADA, the court noted, “[w]hale an employer is not required to create a light duty position where none exists and the ADA permits job requirements that are job-related and consistent with business necessity, a ‘100 percent healed’ or ‘fully-healed’ policy is per se a violation of the ADA.” Todd Wright v. Middle Tenn. Elec. Membership Corp., No. 3:05-cv-00969 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 7, 2006)


    Impact: Employers are advised that when considering the return to work of employees on medical leaves of absences, reasonable accommodation may be required in the event the returning employee is unable to perform all of the job duties of their former position.

Posted on February 8, 2007July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Do We Find Trainers Willing to Go the Extra Mile

Dear Winnowing:



Finding trainers who are willing to go the extra mile requires you to assess them for characteristics that go beyond their work experiences and job skills. To get at the work ethic that translates into extra effort, you should structure your hiring process to also assess these candidates for their likelihood to be engaged with the work. Engagement is a composite of several areas that touch on human personality, including a person’s adaptability, orientation toward achieving goals, enjoyment of or attraction to work, emotional maturity and positive disposition. Breaking down each of these components enables you to look closely and reliably at candidates to determine whether they represent a good fit with your organization.

The hiring process provides at least two ways to identify top candidates who also are likely to become highly engaged in their work (in part, meaning that they are willing to spend extra time to help the organization accomplish its performance goals).

The first method occurs during the screening phase. There are numerous online tests to help you assess candidates’ work styles and dispositions, in addition to their work-related judgment and background experiences. Researchers say candidates who score well on these types of tests are up to 13 times more likely to be engaged. Tests like these can help you identify candidates who not only have the skills but who are much more likely to want to do the job–and who will consistently extend themselves to go above and beyond.

The second method is the interview phase, which offers a great opportunity to explore candidates’ engagement levels (whether or not you use a screening test like those mentioned). Specially designed behavior-based questions give candidates an opportunity to demonstrate their likelihood to be engaged. Interviewers who have been properly trained in data collection and evaluation techniques can readily see which candidates will be more likely than others to help your organization move forward through a stronger commitment of their own time, talent and resources.

The hiring process consists of more than screening and interviewing; sourcing, qualifying and onboarding processes also play major parts. These other phases can also be examined to determine whether there are better ways to provide candidates who are more likely to make extra effort. It also is extremely important to help leaders understand their roles in creating and maintaining an environment that capitalizes on a workforce of engaged people, once your hiring process has been improved to find them.

SOURCE: Michael Haid, Development Dimensions International, Pittsburgh, March 28, 2006.

LEARN MORE: For another perspective, please read How Do We Gauge a Person’s Passion and Commitment During Job Interviews?

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on February 7, 2007July 10, 2018

Odd Bedfellows Join Hands in Health Care Debate

Four major companies joined the Service Employees International Union and diverse policy groups on Wednesday, February 7, to advocate overhauling the U.S. health care system by 2012—but the corporate participants stopped short of endorsing a government takeover.


Wal-Mart, AT&T, Intel and Kelly Services are participating in the “Better Health Care Together” campaign, which is composed of a number of organizations from across the political spectrum and designed to elevate and frame the health care debate. It is one of several recently launched diverse groups with that mission.


The campaign will put pressure on politicians to address high health costs, lack of coverage for 47 million Americans and uneven quality in the system.


Each member of the group signed a statement of four principles that says, among other things, “Every person in America must have quality, affordable health insurance coverage” and “businesses, governments and individuals all should contribute to managing and financing a new American health care system.”


At a Washington press conference, corporate leaders asserted that the employer-based health insurance model in the United States is broken. Health costs hamper U.S. firms as they try to compete in the global economy against foreign companies that aren’t weighed down by similarly high health expenses.


“It’s time to admit that the 60-year experiment of employer-based health coverage is over,” said Carl Camden, president and CEO of Kelly Services.


But neither Camden nor any of the other executives at the event backed a government-run system that would get corporations out of the health care business. Each declared that the patient—the U.S. health care system—is sick, but shied away from offering prescriptions.


“We have lots of policy options,” Camden said. “The question is, do we have the political will to act on those options.”


The companies say that building political will, rather than advocating particular policy approaches, is their goal at this point.


“Joining the coalition is part of moving the dialogue forward,” Wal-Mart president and CEO Lee Scott says. “At Wal-Mart, we’re committed to health care and believe it has to be high quality, affordable and accessible. The current health care system doesn’t work for many Americans.”


AT&T suggested that it did not want to abandon coverage for its workers and retirees. The company provides health care for 1.2 million people at a cost of $5 billion annually.


“We’re convinced that this is the right thing to do for our employees and shareholders and we’re committed to this path,” said James Cicconi, AT&T senior executive vice president for external and legislative affairs.


But Cicconi argued that something must be done to cover the 47 million Americans who lack insurance. If companies can provide coverage for their employees, “we as a country should do no less for those lacking coverage.”


Former Senate Majority Leader Howard Baker Jr., R-Tennessee, the founder of an eponymous public policy center at the University of Tennessee, maintains that the political climate favors addressing major overhaul, including issues surrounding the uninsured.


“This is the time for health care reform,” he said. “It will be a hot debate. America will be sharply divided on some issues.” Baker is a sponsor of the coalition.


Business needs to step into that fray, says John Podesta, president of the Center for American Progress and another coalition sponsor.


“Corporate America is central to breaking the logjam on health care reform,” he says.


The collection of odd political bedfellows will help achieve that goal, SEIU president Andrew Stern notes.


“We need fundamental change,” he says.

—Mark Schoeff Jr.


 


 

Posted on February 7, 2007July 10, 2018

Sex Discrimination Suit Against Wal-Mart Gets Go-Ahead

San Francisco has upheld class-action status for a sexual discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores.

The case, brought by a group of seven women accusing the world’s largest retailer of bias in pay and promotion, is set to become the largest class-action employment discrimination suit in U.S. history. Some 1.6 million women have worked in Wal-Mart stores since 1998 and could potentially join the suit.


Just hours after the ruling was handed down Tuesday, February 6, the Bentonville, Arkansas-based retailer announced plans to fight the 9th Circuit Court’s decision, which upholds a 2004 decision to let the lawsuit go to trial. Wal-Mart could pay billions of dollars in damages if it loses the case.


“This is just another step in what will be a very long process, and we are still in the early stages of the case,” said Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and lead counsel for Wal-Mart’s appeal. “We are optimistic about our chances for obtaining relief from this ruling as the case progresses.”


Wal-Mart’s attempts to fight the ruling, however, could be an uphill battle, says Elizabeth Lawrence, a partner at San Francisco-based law firm Davis, Cowell & Bowe and an attorney for the plaintiffs.


“The court upheld the original class-action status that was granted in 2004,” she says. “This bodes negatively for any further appeals strategy Wal-Mart may launch.”


According to Lawrence, Wal-Mart does not want the suit to go to trial under class-action status. Instead, the company would prefer each woman who believes that she was discriminated against to file suit as an individual.


“That would clog the legal system because there are hundreds of women who were victims of bias practices,” Lawrence says. “Besides, many of these women barely make minimum wage and could never afford to launch a suit against a big company.”


Wal-Mart says it is not guilty of the charges, and points to recognition it has received for promoting diversity within the workplace. The company was named of the 50 Best Companies for Latinas to Work for in the United States by Latina Style magazine and also ranked in the Top 40 U.S. Companies for Diversity by Black Enterprise magazine.


Despite the accolades, the plaintiffs assert that discrimination took place and say Wal-Mart’s centralized management structure could be one of the contributing factors.


“The company is completely run out of Bentonville,” Lawrence says.


Wal-Mart’s intentions to appeal the ruling didn’t come as a surprise to Lawrence.


“We are disappointed that Wal-Mart has launched legal warfare,” she says. “The time has come for the company to admit there is a problem and try to fix it.”


—Gina Ruiz



For more coverage of Wal-Mart’s people problems, click on these links:


Wal-Mart Answers Its Critics


People Problems on Every Aisle


Posted on February 6, 2007July 10, 2018

High-Performance Recruiting in Tough Markets

When Jake Randall needs to recruit a mechanical engineer in the oil and gas industry, he must contact 75 to 100 potential candidates before he can fill the position. In 2004, contacting 25 to 30 potential candidates sufficed.


    “It’s three times harder now to find a candidate who is qualified, interested and ready to take a new job,” he says.


    Randall is a top recruiter for Futurestep and project leader for its oil and gas division, specializing in filling engineering and geoscience positions for client companies that range from the largest integrated oil companies to small independents. Salaries for these positions start at $90,000. Job growth in the U.S. oil and gas industry hit 11.3 percent in 2006.


    “The market is absolutely incredible,” Randall notes. “There’s a severe shortage of candidates, and a huge push coming from the industry because of high oil and gas prices. And as more companies snap up more candidates, the talent pool shrinks.”


    Futurestep is a Korn/Ferry company that focuses on recruiting for middle management positions. It organizes its 454 recruiters into practices that cover the consumer/retail, finance, government, health care, life sciences, technology and industrial sectors.


    The industrial practice includes oil and gas. In Futurestep’s Houston office, a dedicated staff of six reports to Randall, and he scales the team based on client demand. The metrics he uses to evaluate the effectiveness of each recruiter working under him include placements secured, interviews per month, the number of people networked per day and the number of outbound calls per day.


    Randall’s recruiters typically handle 10 positions at a time, and each recruiter has full responsibility for those positions.


    “They receive extensive support from me and from our staff of research assistants, dialers and sourcers looking for active candidates,” he notes. “Futurestep has huge resources and capabilities.”


    The oil and gas industry now represents a worst-case scenario for recruiters. High job growth, an acute lack of candidates and the inability to find similar skill sets in sister industries create near-impossible conditions for filling critical positions. Randall’s approach is instructive for any recruiter working in tight labor markets.


Sourcing far and wide
   Randall begins every search with a kickoff call to the client. He talks directly to the hiring manager to gain a better understanding of the intangibles of the job. He may also speak with the HR executive to review the process he plans to use. “The goal is to get the best sense of what kind of candidate will deliver real value to the company as soon as possible and fit the company’s culture,” he says.


    Randall’s most productive outreach method is classic sourcing. “We select 25 to 50 competitor companies depending on the specific sector we are looking in, and note their locations,” he says. “This allows us to geographically locate the talent.” Randall’s research staff generates the names of potential candidates at other companies, their location, title and contact information.


    “Passive candidates are typically the best qualified for the positions we need to fill, and they are also less susceptible to multiple offers, which has become a huge problem in this market,” he notes. The geographic area may be very broad, so Randall must determine whether relocating the new hire is realistic.


    The position requirements are often quite specific. “We want to create the largest candidate pool possible,” Randall says. “But it’s a balancing act. If we create a pool that is too broad, we won’t able to fill the position efficiently, and if we go too narrow, we won’t produce a sufficient number of candidates.”


    In addition to classic methods designed to reach passive candidates, Randall makes use of industry associations such as the Society of Petroleum Engineers, the American Association of Petroleum Geologists and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.


    “Using the industry associations is imperative in our line of business,” he reports. “We hold memberships and access their directories.” The industry associations represent a large portion of the labor supply for oil and gas professionals.


    Randall also makes heavy use of LinkedIn, which he says is an effective tool, and other online networks. He also taps the major job boards and niche boards such as Rigzone.com, Oilcareers.com and Worldwideworker.com.


    “Oil and gas is a flat industry with few geographic barriers,” Randall notes. “In addition to sourcing in the United States, we also source abroad for U.S. citizens who are working in other countries. We may find a U.S. engineer in Russia just as easily as Indiana.”


    Among U.S. citizens working abroad, Randall sees a growing interest in returning to the United States. “The sizable differential in compensation that originally took them away— higher pay and large hardship premiums— is smaller now because there is some global equalization of compensation,” he reports.


    If the differentials are lower, candidates are more willing to think about retuning to the United States. Randall leverages Futurestep’s overseas offices for support if a candidate is in their location.


The ‘contact sport’
   With potential passive and active candidates identified for a position, Randall begins to work through the pool. “From this point on, recruiting is a contact sport,” Randall says. “The more people you touch, the more effective you will be.”


    If Randall introduces 100 potential candidates to a specific opportunity by phone or e-mail, he will typically receive a response from 50 to 60. “We are looking for three to five fully vetted candidates for each position,” he says.


    “Once we have an interested candidate, we must sell the client. Because we have a retained arrangement with our clients, we have a deeper relationship with them and know them well. When we talk to the candidate, we sell the company, the compensation package, the location, and education and career opportunities, which are very important to engineers.”


    Randal then presents the three to five candidates to the client. “In addition to all the information we have gathered from the candidate and the vetting process, we also present intangibles that may have come out in our interviews,” he says.


    On average, client companies ask for interviews with 80 percent of the candidates he presents—a very high interview ratio. After the presentation, Randall follows up with phone calls to the candidates to pursue any questions the client raised.


    Before the candidate goes for the face-to-face interview with the hiring manager, Randall ensures that potential deal-breakers have been discussed. “If relocation is involved, we make sure that the candidate has already initiated a conversation with his or her family about the potential move,” Randall notes. “We also make sure that the compensation expectations have been addressed.”


    If the client is satisfied with the candidate, Randall steps back into the process to begin the negotiations about what it will take for the client to secure the candidate. “I’m constantly on the phone with the candidate and the client and push the process along when needed,” he says.


    “Any solid blue-chip candidate will receive multiple offers. To combat this, we are in a continuous process of talking to the candidates. We are very focused on candidate care and take a consultative approach that centers on their fit and their career progression. It’s a selling atmosphere.”


    Randall drops the hard sell and backs away from a candidate, however, if he is concerned that the candidate might not stick with the position. “We want to see a minimum of three years with every employer when we look at a candidate’s work history,” he notes.


    “The only thing worse than not being able to close a deal is to close one with a candidate who leaves after 60 days on the job. But we have a great track record for finding candidates who stick.”


    With the labor shortage bearing down, Randall is beginning to look at new graduates for some clients, but they are also in short supply. “During the oil and gas downturn that began in the late 1980s and continued through the 1990s, new industries emerged and attracted talented students,” he says.


    According to Randall, the number of new graduates in petroleum engineering has dropped from 10,000 to 12,000 a year in the 1980s down to 2,000 a year now. “Today, new graduates are wooed by multiple companies while they are still in college,” he says.


    The Futurestep oil and gas group also fills international positions. “Right now, we are filling positions in Dubai and Brazil,” Randall reports. “We also do some sourcing abroad for foreign nationals to fill jobs here, but there is some pushback from our clients.”


    Clients are reluctant to look at foreign nationals because few H-1B visas are available and the process is expensive. “In addition, U.S. oil and gas companies are long established and generally prefer U.S. talent for continuity and communication reasons,” Randall says.


    He notes, however, that if the labor markets continue to tighten and Congress raises the H-1B visa cap, U.S. oil and gas companies will be more receptive to hiring foreign engineers. “We’ve already seen lower resistance, and it will continue to drop,” he says.

Posted on February 5, 2007July 10, 2018

Misery at the Top Execs Unhappy with Jobs Too

Misery at the Top: The rank-and-file aren’t the only ones scouting for better job opportunities. Executives also are increasingly dissatisfied, with a staggering 87 percent vowing to bolt their firms sometime in 2007. That’s according to a survey of executives by recruiting company ExecuNet in Norwalk, Connecticut, which polled more than 100 executives making an average salary of $192,000. Money isn’t a factor in their unhappiness. The lack of challenging work tops the list of reasons, with limited opportunities for career growth a close second.


—Garry Kranz

Posted on February 2, 2007July 10, 2018

Senate OKs Minimum Wage, Tax Bill

The Senate has approved a minimum wage and tax measure that would eliminate the tax deductibility of punitive damage awards.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Montana, included the punitive damage provision as part of the measure designed to reduce the taxes of small businesses faced with having to pay more to minimum wage-earning employees. The small business tax relief bill was added to the larger minimum wage bill late last month.


The House version of the minimum wage increase bill does not contain the punitive damage provision, and differences between the two versions eventually will have to be ironed out by a conference committee.


—Business Insurance

Posted on February 2, 2007July 10, 2018

Senator Seeks Expansion of FMLA

The author of the law that allows U.S. workers 12 weeks of unpaid leave for family or medical needs is set to introduce a bill that would expand the scope of the original measure.

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Connecticut, announced Thursday, February 1, that he intends to offer a bill that will provide six weeks of paid leave for employees. Dodd, chairman of the children and families subcommittee of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, wrote the Family and Medical Leave Act.


Since that bill became law in February 1993, 50 million people have taken time off work for the birth or adoption of a child or to care for themselves or a sick immediate family member. Under the FMLA, they are guaranteed that their job will be protected.


Dodd is concerned that many people don’t take advantage of FMLA because they can’t afford to abandon their paychecks. “I fail to see why that right should stop at a certain income,” he said at a Capitol Hill press conference.


The U.S. workplace hasn’t kept pace with the reality of dual-income families, Dodd says. When both parents work, they sometimes have to make wrenching decisions about caring for a sick family member or staying on the job.


“These are questions they go through contortions trying to deal with,” Dodd says.


Under Dodd’s proposal, employers, employees and the federal government would share the costs of the leave.


It’s not possible to estimate the price tag right now.


“I think a far better question is, what happens if we do nothing?” Dodd says. “What happens to families?”


It took Dodd seven years to guide the FMLA into law. The political terrain may be just as difficult this time. He benefits from having his party in charge of the Senate. That makes it likely the bill will get a hearing and be marked up.


Dodd still must persuade enough Republicans to support the measure to get at least 60 votes in the Senate. In the early 1990s, he succeeded in getting key conservatives on board. He believes he’s off to a good start this time because the first co-sponsor of the bill is Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska.


Another constituency he’ll have to convince is the business community. Although companies don’t advocate wiping FMLA off the books, many executives want to see some of its regulations modified. They say abuse of the system raises costs.


Dodd argues that FMLA has been a boon to business because it has increased productivity, retention and employee engagement.


“I’m counting on some of our critics from 20 years ago standing up and saying that this works,” he said.


Debra Ness, president of the National Partnership for Women & Families, also stresses the benefit for business.


“There’s money saved because of the high cost of turnover,” she said.


The Department of Labor is conducting an FMLA review. It is accepting comments from the public until February 16. Ness vowed not to let the agency undermine the law through regulatory changes.


At the Dodd press conference, Ness released a study by Jody Heymann of Harvard and McGill Universities, the 2007 Work, Family, and Equity Index: How Does the U.S. Measure Up? It shows that 168 countries around the world have paid maternity leave and 145 provide paid sick days. The United States does neither.


“America’s paid leave policies are shameful,” Dodd said.


—Mark Schoeff Jr.


Posted on February 2, 2007July 10, 2018

Thoughts on HR and Creating a Culture of Innovation Within Companies

At a time when the concept of creating cultures of innovation has become the focus of major conferences and endless ink, the question of HR’s role in fostering creativity is up for grabs. Several leading scholars weigh in on the subject:


  • Vijay Govindarajan, professor at Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business and author of Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators: From Idea to Execution:

“Today, innovation is not synonymous with technology. If it is embedded in the organization, even the person in the mailroom is part of innovation. HR is very critical to developing an innovative culture, but the people in HR don’t play the right role. They create processes. They are viewed as a nuisance. The new role of HR is going to be as global talent scout and to work with the chief learning officer. That is critical.”


  • Jeffrey Pfeffer, professor of organizational behavior and human resource management at Stanford University and author of Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths and Total Nonsense: Profiting From Evidence-Based Management:

“Rewiring a company for creativity and growth isn’t just about technology, it’s about how to do job better and how to get the best out of everyone. It’s about winning the battle, and you can’t have too many bystanders. You must get everyone involved. Google has an amazing culture because everyone has ideas and makes suggestions.”


“One problem in writing about HR and innovation is that HR people are the least creative people in the organization. HR is into rules. They are the ones who say, ‘No, you can’t break this rule.’ This, of course, is the opposite of building a culture of creativity.”


  • Philippe Baumard, visiting professor at the Hass School of Business, University of California, Berkeley. Baumard studies innovation:

“HR needs to focus on people who can think about destruction. They must hire people who can make radical and rapid change. Today, 90 percent of organizations change their core activity in 15 years on average. It’s a much shorter cycle than it used to be. Companies have to avoid hiring people who look like them or have the same background or came from the same university.”


“Harley-Davidson would have died, but it woke up at the right time. It hired people with a passion for the products—people who understood customer service and could think creatively. It’s HR’s job to find these people and watch over them and keep track of them. They must bring new skills and be people who have handled real situations before successfully in different industries.”


“You can train for creativity by rewarding innovation. Most employees are afraid of the consequences if they say too much. When there’s fear of the boss, there’s no creative magic. To reinvent an organization, you have to have all kinds of talent and you must have the right quantity—maybe 10 percent—of people capable of making radical change.”


Posted on February 2, 2007July 10, 2018

Procter & Gamble Gets Some IDEO

A couple of years ago, Procter & Gamble CEO Alan G. Lafley loaded up his entire Global Leadership Council, 40 business-unit heads, for a pilgrimage to San Francisco. The one-day immersion, sponsored by IDEO, was designed to open the eyes of the executives to new ways of thinking.


    “I think the world of them,” says Lafley, one of dozens of top execs who maintain a close strategic relationship with IDEO and who has been at the helm of P&G as earnings at the $70 billion consumer products giant have more than doubled in five years.


    IDEO general manager Tom Kelley says that successful businesses like P&G build fresh innovation strategies into the fabric of their operations, from product design to people management. Their goal isn’t just to develop hot new products, but to learn how to create the process of creativity itself though constant collaboration, brainstorming and the free expression of ideas.


    Kent Lynde, P&G’s associate director of research and development, credits IDEO chief executive Tim Brown with being the one of the forces in the change of thinking at P&G. At IDEO, “all company levels are fluid and organic,” Lynde says. “There’s no ‘I’m better than you.’ There are no barriers. People work quickly and holistically. The human and the mechanical are symbiotic.


    “P&G is very well structured about how it profiles people to a corporate standard,” Lynde continues. “The person we hire in Russia has the same profile as here in America. The major element is this: Core skill sets project the winners of the future. We hire outside but only promote from within.”


    Jennifer Irwin, P&G’s senior manager of global HR, says the 140,000-employee company has updated its HR programs in the past couple of years to reflect the high priority the CEO places on innovation throughout the organization.


    “Innovation was called out as a key competency,” Irwin says. “It is communicated through our global competencies, or ‘success drivers.’ All of our businesses use it in every region of the world to find out the aspects of successful employees.


    “P&G is a leader in assessment technology—more than any other company. We try to get innovation into the process of our assessment methodology,” she says. “Our focus is on innovation in the creation of the brand and on new ideas and products.”


    At P&G, where as many as 200,000 assessments can be conducted in a year, the evaluations are developed and executed internally and are delivered online. Applicants with the highest scores are then given multiple interviews that typically last an hour or more for entry-level management or office administration positions. The same interview standards are used worldwide.


    “We measure online biographical assessments in our competency model,” Irwin says. “We look at historical behavior, how a person handles new ideas to solve new problems. It’s very rigorous.”


    At P&G, the centerpiece of its new model for innovation is the company’s connect-and-develop program, a highly successful strategy that dispensed with the company’s “invent it ourselves” model and now scours the Earth for new technology and people. It created new job classifications such as 70 worldwide technology “entrepreneurs” to embrace the brains of the world from places like university labs.


    The radical strategy now produces more than 35 percent of the company’s innovations and billions of dollars in revenue. “We have expanded the mind-set of people throughout the organization,” says Larry Huston, P&G’s vice president for innovation and knowledge and the principle architect of the program.


    “We are developing specialty roles and redefining roles,” he says. “If we need innovation, we use to run to the bench. Now, we have to be clear about what [we need’ and ask, ‘Does the solution exist within P&G? Does it exist in the world?’


    “It used to be that we’d go back to the bench and find the solution ourselves. It used to be about know-how. Now it’s know-how plus know-who.”

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress