Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on January 10, 2007July 10, 2018

Lowe’s Builds Its Employment Brand

L owe’s, the second-largest home improvement retailer worldwide, opens a new store every three days and recruits more than 60,000 employees a year. The monthly recruiting average includes 130 new hires for the corporate office in Mooresville, North Carolina, and 5,000 for the 1,442 stores scattered across the U.S.

   The Fortune 50 company employs a total of 210,000 workers in 48 states and pulls in $44 billion a year in revenue. With compound annual average sales growth topping 19 percent since 1994 and annual net income growth averaging 26 percent, the company is in hyperdrive, quietly outpacing Home Depot with superior service and newer stores.

   Although analysts predict that Lowe’s will continue to steal market share from Home Depot in 2007, the entire $312 billion home improvement products industry is under pressure as the housing market continues to cool. Still, with profits rising for 23 consecutive quarters, Lowe’s plans to continue new store openings in the U.S. and Canada through 2007, with its massive recruiting machine still moving in high gear.

   Catherine Keown, Lowe’s director of recruiting, manages all recruiting with an internal staff of 35. Twenty-six recruiters are assigned to the company’s headquarters to handle the full cycle of recruiting for the corporate workforce of 5,000, aided by two search firms for hard-to-fill positions.

   An additional nine recruiters work in the field to source managerial candidates for the stores and distribution centers. Each store, which typically employs 125 to150 workers, has one HR manager, who handles all hiring for hourly positions.

   “The store positions, which generally require a high school degree and some retail experience, are not difficult to fill,” Keown says. “The corporate positions are more of a challenge.”

   Lowe’s meteoric sales growth and enviable earnings-per-share record reflect the company’s success in building a strong customer brand. Keown has turned her attention to building an equally strong employment brand that will ensure a steady flow of top candidates for headquarters.

Illuminating weak spots
   Lowe’s consumers know its stores for its wide, well-lit aisles and bright, easy-to-shop displays.

   “We want our recruiting tools to simulate our stores with a brighter electronic environment that will entice candidates to work for Lowe’s,” Keown reports. “We want new college graduates and professionals to look at Lowe’s as a career destination.”

   About 75 percent of all corporate-level candidates come in through the Lowe’s Web site.

   To glean the information needed to build the employment brand, Keown implemented Bernard Hodes’ QTrac recruiting and employment branding analytics in October 2006.

   “We wanted to gauge the effectiveness of the recruiting process and more fully capture the candidate experience,” she says.

   QTrac is designed to measure the effectiveness of the employment brand and its impact on recruiting and retention. The goal is to provide measurements, analytics and benchmarks for gauging the ROI of employment branding efforts. Six Fortune 500 companies, including Lowe’s and Bank of America, piloted QTrac in 2006—ahead of Hodes’ national QTrac rollout in January 2007.

   QTrac uses a new-hire survey that covers every step in the recruiting process. The online survey takes 10 to 15 minutes and is administered to new hires after 30 days on the job and again at 90 days, 180 days and 365 days to capture the new hire’s experience with the company four times during the first year of employment.

   “QTrac allows me to see how the recruiting process impacts candidate perceptions of the company, and confirms our internal research findings about the process and the candidates,” Keown says.

   The point is to capture any weakness in the recruiting, onboarding, training and new-hire experience that HR needs to address to ensure effective recruiting and retention. Lowe’s is now using QTrac for all corporate hires, and averaging an 85 percent response rate to the survey on a voluntary basis.

   “The first 30 days are critical to retention,” says Bradley Savoy, director of strategic development at Bernard Hodes. “The first 90 days are a key point for referrals. The six-month and one-year surveys capture the full year of the employment relationship.”

Tracking the relationship
   The survey for each time period asks different questions that are most relevant to a new hire at that mark.

   “We can map how a new hire’s view of the company changes over the first year,” Savoy says.

   Keown receives QTrac reports on Lowe’s new hires each month and discusses the results with the business units to improve recruiting techniques and the candidate experience. After only two months of QTrac reporting, she gained information that her recruiting team could translate into tangible plans for improving the process.

   “For example, QTrac told us that candidates want more information about the company upfront,” Keown says. “Throughout 2007, we will be revising our online career site to provide that information. The QTrac results allowed us to develop a stronger action plan to meet this need.”

   Keown’s overall strategic recruiting plan for 2007 is geared toward enhancing the candidate experience.

   “In addition to providing more information about the company upfront, we will try to make the candidate experience more like the customer experience,” she says. Changes in the company’s online career site are under discussion.

   Lowe’s adoption of QTrac is part of a larger movement toward the greater use of analytics to improve recruiting and employment branding.

   “We’ve seen a progression toward analytics and a scorecard view in HR,” Savoy says. “Over the past three years, I’ve seen a higher level of awareness in our client base about analytics. Providers are now stepping up to bring products to the market.”

   In December 2006, ATS provider Cytiva Software launched a new analytics dashboard for its SonicRecruit system. The Recruiting Roundtable also launched a new recruiting dashboard available for its members.

   The ATS community has adopted analytics and dashboards, taking data out of ATSes and putting the information into graphic form.

   “Oracle has been offering HR dashboards for years,” Savoy notes. “But one of the drawbacks with data from ATS is that recruiting professionals are inputting the data, and that may create bumps in what is reported. Most of the dashboards and analytics available are based on ATS data, which is only part of the picture.”

   The push now is to offer companies more complete data on the effectiveness of the recruitment process and related data on the effectiveness of branding initiatives.

   “Companies like Lowe’s and Bank of America are spending money to build their employment brand,” Savoy says. “They perform very well and have deep experience in building their consumer brand, but the value proposition for the employment brand is quite different.”

   The key indicators are the employment brand and the job brand, which consists of whether or not the job is what the new hire thought it would be. QTrac’s analytics measure the ROI for an employment branding initiative and help validate the data coming in through the ATS on the quality of sourcing methods and other recruiting factors.

   The ability to pinpoint weaknesses in the recruitment and branding process hinges on detailed analytics.

   “For example, QTrac may report that candidates have problems in face-to-face interviews with specific hiring managers,” Savoy notes. “A company can determine the value proposition for the employee and implement changes necessary to strengthen it.”

   QTrac is also a retention tool. Survey questions on compensation and benefits, the working environment, the relationship with supervisors and other factors identify the top 10 areas of risk with respect to retaining employees. The responses to each survey question are graphed along with the initial baseline.

   The information that is collected and reported monthly through QTrac is also provided in more extensive quarterly reports. The benchmarking shows where the company is off the mark relative to competitors and companies in other industries.

   “The problems that clients are seeing through the use of QTrac are with the job brand and whether it effectively sells the job and clearly portrays what is entailed in the job,” Savoy reports.

   QTrac strips off each layer of the recruiting process to undercut erroneous assumptions about new hires. For example, one question in the survey that is administered after 30 days on the job asks the new hires if they would be willing to recommend the company to a friend.

   “One client found that 95 percent of its new hires would be willing to recommend the company and refer friends, but the company wasn’t tapping these employees for referrals until much later in their employment,” Savoy says.

   The survey results launched a discussion about whether the company might ask for referrals as early as the onboarding process.

   “Companies still have a long way to go in obtaining data and then understanding its value and acting on it,” Savoy reports. “HR executives can take data into the C-suite, but the challenge now is to show the actions taken as a result of the data and the results produced from those actions.”

   Keown is ready to do just that as she builds the employment brand at Lowe’s and tracks the impact of the effort on recruiting for the company’s most important positions.

Posted on January 9, 2007July 10, 2018

Congress Goes After Retirement Plan Fees

With Rep. George Miller, D-California, and the Department of Labor bearing down on them, benefits industry lobbyists and attorneys expect new disclosure reforms this year that could put a damper on fees assessed to manage defined-benefit and defined-contribution plans.

Fees associated with administering retirement benefit plans are at the top of this year’s federal government policy agenda because Miller—who officially stepped in as chairman of the influential House Education and Labor Committee on January 4—is concerned that excessive charges might be cheating plan participants of investment returns for their retirements.


“You seem to have a lot of people who in some cases appear to be somewhat fast and loose with other people’s money,” Miller said in an interview with Pensions & Investments. “I think we have an obligation to ask: Are the employees getting a fair shake here?”


Benefits industry officials say the Labor Department this year is also expected to establish sanctioned default investment options for defined-contribution plans with automatic enrollment and set ground rules for financial firms offering investment advice to 401(k) plan participants.


Industry fees have been under Labor Department scrutiny for the past several years, and the department has signaled it favors some additional disclosure.


From his new bully pulpit as chairman of the key congressional committee that oversees the Department of Labor, Miller is expected to hold the department’s feet to the fire on the issue.


Washington and a former benefits tax counsel at the Treasury Department.


Labor Department spokesman Peter Hong declined comment.


How much information
As it stands, the Labor Department is considering an initiative aimed at spelling out how much fee information sponsors should be required to disclose to plan participants and how that information should be provided.


A November 30 report by the General Accountability Office requested by Miller recommends that legislation requiring plan sponsors to disclose fee information to participants in a way that would allow them to compare their plan investment options. The agency also recommended legislation requiring 401(k) service providers to disclose to plan sponsors all compensation received from other service providers, and that the Department of Labor require plan sponsors to provide a summary of all fees that are paid out of plan assets or by participants.


In the interview, Miller, who has already called for hearings on 401(k) plan fees, said he had yet to decide whether the legislation will fully address his concerns. But he says Department of Labor representatives will be summoned to Capitol Hill to explain what they’re doing about fees.


Miller also says he hoped that adding transparency to the fees assessed for plan investment options, along with regulations ensuring the fee information is useful to participants, will put a damper on excessive fees.


“Many people work very, very hard to accumulate savings and retirement resources that they think are necessary, and they should not be victimized by those they entrust their money to,” he says.


At least some industry lobbyists are skeptical about how much additional fee information can save plan participants—on the argument that the competition among 401(k) plan money managers should keep the level of fees in check.


Not widespread
“This [excessive fees] is not a widespread problem,” says Brian H. Graff, executive director and CEO of the American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries in Arlington, Virginia. “When you’ve got people doing stuff [to manage your plan], you’ve got to pay them.”


Added Ed Ferrigno, vice president of Washington affairs for the Chicago-based Profit Sharing/401(k) Council of America: “One concern we have is that we have an appropriate balance between disclosure and costs [of complying with new disclosure requirements] because they [plans] use plan assets to pay these costs.”


Miller made clear he believes the focus should be on the impact that fees have on the retirement savings of plan participants, keeping in mind that what he sees as the affluent lifestyles of many in the financial services industries is often supported by fees drawn from the retirement savings of plan participants.


“I think you’ve got to ask yourself: What’s the fiduciary duty to people in middle-class families who are busting their ass to try to provide for their retirement? What’s the fiduciary responsibility to people who are managing their money?” Miller says.


“I find with interest as an avid reader of business journals that even the big guys squabble over fees. And you know, a lot of times it’s the old business with when the big guys are fighting, the grass gets trampled,” Miller adds.


Miller voted against the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the most comprehensive overhaul of the nation’s benefits law since the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. He issued a news release Aug. 17—the day President Bush signed the bill—saying the new law put “pension plans at greater risk of being cut or dumped entirely.” But in the interview, Miller said he has no immediate plans to revisit the bill with new legislation.


“I’m not so tied to the bill,” he says. “For the moment, that’s yesterday’s newspaper.


“There’s some school of thought that that’s what in fact the bill will do: It will make it easier to get away from defined-benefit plans,” Miller added. “I think we have an obligation to try to run ahead of the curve and see what’s down the road, and if that [moving away from defined-benefit plans] is going to continue to happen, where is it that these people are going to make up the resources necessary for their retirement?”


Indexed vs. managed
One question posed by Miller is whether plan participants would be better off with their money invested in lower-cost indexed accounts than in higher-cost managed accounts. “We see the number of people who can’t beat the Street, but they’re getting big fees for trying,” he says. “Is that really where people’s money should be?”


But at the same time, he says participants should be able to call the tune on how their money is invested.


“People are still entitled to make bad decisions,” he says. “But even a bad decision should be an informed decision.”


Miller also says he had yet to decide whether to support an initiative by money managers to modify a provision in the Pension Protection Act that allows money managers to give advice to 401(k) plan participants on a plan’s investment options, including the manager’s own products.


Under the so-called “fee-leveling” provision at issue, financial firms offering advice are required to charge a single flat fee to participants, regardless of what investment options are chosen. That, according to money managers, makes the regulatory relief effectively useless to them because they charge higher fees for some strategies than they do for others.


“I don’t know yet,” Miller says on whether he favors eliminating the fee-leveling provision. At the same time, he says that cost of the advice, like the fees and commissions associated with administering a plan, come from the retirement funds.


“I think transparency becomes very, very important here,” Miller says.


According to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonprofit Washington research group that tracks money in politics, top contributors to Miller’s 2006 re-election campaign included the AFL-CIO, the Air Line Pilots Association, the National Education Association and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers—groups that traditionally support the interests of employees on retirement-related issues.


—Doug Halonen is a reporter for Workforce Management
sister publication Pensions & Investments, where this story originally appeared.

Posted on January 9, 2007July 10, 2018

5 Questions for Michael Watkins, Founder of Consulting Firm Genesis Advisers

Leading an organization has become a minefield, according to Michael Watkins. It’s not enough for leaders to be visionaries; they need to be apt negotiators. It’s up to companies to nourish these skills, Watkins says. A former Harvard Business School professor and author of The First 90 Days: Critical Success Strategies for New Leaders at All Levels, Watkins recently spoke to Workforce Management staff writer Jessica Marquez.
 
Workforce Management: How have the skills that leaders need changed over the years?

Michael Watkins: We live in times where authority is not given the credence it used to [get]. Younger people are not willing to be led by authority in quite the same way as the World War II generation was. That trend, on top of the trend toward flatter organizations and the implementation of matrix structures within organizations, requires leaders today to be negotiating all the time. Any mandate or authority a leader has is won through negotiations.

WM: So how should leadership development programs be structured?

Watkins: Companies are trying to help managers understand the real complexities and trade-offs of managing a business. Some are doing this through “niblet learning,” where they give people tools when they have a problem through e-learning. For example, if a manager wants help giving employee performance feedback, they can pull up a few tools and worksheets to help them. There is more action learning. I have worked with Johnson & Johnson for a number of years. They took 100 of their top people in the medical device sector and went through half a dozen business issues and diagnosed the problems and delivered solutions. Those kinds of programs give leaders strategic insight into the business.

WM: What metrics should be used to evaluate leadership development programs?

Watkins: If the core line managers think something is valuable and you can sustain that belief in its value, then it’s worth doing. All the measurement in the world isn’t going to help you if the line doesn’t think it’s important. In the long run, you want to look at whether the organization has a reasonably robust leadership pipeline, meaning that they have a group of candidates for any given position. Companies also want to identify key gaps in the leadership pipeline—where are there choke points and what is the organization doing to address them?

WM: Are leaders today more aware of the importance of ethical behavior?

Watkins: We are in an environment in which ethical lapses have been punished very severely. If you look at the options backdating scandals, there wasn’t really illegality in what they did, but it wasn’t ethical and it wasn’t consistent with business values. Are people being severely punished? Not always, but often. The backdating scandals reveal the extent to which ethical lapses have been a road to ruin for managers, and I think they get it.

WM: But shouldn’t managers have learned this lesson from Enron and WorldCom?

Watkins: I think this is different. It’s hard to think of another example where legal but unethical behavior has been so severely punished. I think this does mark a watershed event, but of course, only time will tell.

Workforce Management, December 11, 2006, p. 11 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on January 8, 2007July 10, 2018

Why VPs of HR Don’t Become CEOs

Have you noticed that in announcements about people being promoted to the CEO level, their previous job title is almost always CFO, CIO or general manager of a business unit? Rarely, if ever, were they VPs of HR.


    I have monitored the topic for years and can attest that it’s incredibly rare to find a Fortune 500 VP of HR who has been promoted to CEO within his or her organization. It’s a striking indication that HR still has a long way to go. The dearth of direct promotions is especially troubling in that most outbound Fortune 500 CEOs have at one time or another declared publicly that “people are our most important asset.”


    Having had the opportunity to advise literally hundreds of VPs of HR around the world over the course of my career, I have concluded that there are a number of reasons why HR VPs are rarely tapped to lead organizations. Here’s my top 10 (unlike David Letterman’s list, I haven’t ranked mine):


  • Failing to state CEO as a career goal. Many VPs of HR publicly declare that serving in that job is the pinnacle of their career dreams. They see themselves as a behind-the-scenes player. And they are therefore often treated as such.


  • Failing to build a well-recognized internal HR brand. Image is as important within an organization as it is outside one. Unfortunately, most VPs fail to develop an internal brand as the solver of strategic business problems.


  • Failing to prove impact. HR people are notorious for calling themselves business partners, but routinely fail to act like business professionals by not using the language of business: dollars and cents. By not assessing the business impact of HR actions in dollars, HR professionals demonstrate that they don’t understand the big picture.


  • Failing to anticipate and forecast. CEOs seldom dwell on history, focusing instead on the future. In stark contrast, HR professionals rarely, if ever, forecast. They seldom issue warnings or announce plans to quell upcoming people/business problems.


  • Failing to build a competitive advantage. CEOs are often focused on being No. 1 in everything they do. HR, by contrast, tends to manage to the average, focusing on internal comparisons and rarely on external competitors. Only one in a thousand HR functions routinely complete a function-by-function competitive analysis in order to assess and build their competitive advantage.


  • Dwelling on equal treatment instead of differentiating and focusing on performance. Most VPs of HR seem to have an obsession with equity. Unfortunately, increasing workforce productivity requires that HR continually shift its best people and resources from low-impact/low-return areas to high-impact/high-return programs and focus on top performers.


  • Failing to take the lead with technology. In a world of rapid change, nothing sends a clearer message that you are on the leading edge than early adoption of effective technology. Faster, more accurate decisions can only occur when VPs move to make HR paperless and to provide every manager with desktop access to decision tools and people information.


  • Failing to think and act globally. The world of business is flattening, but most VPs of HR continue to be “location-centric.” Frequently, HR fails to develop a global strategy where “one size fits one.” They also fail to develop programs to share best practices, which can enable rapid learning and solution sharing around the world.


  • Failing to demonstrate responsiveness and effectiveness within HR. Although it is essential in order to build credibility, HR often fails to deliver excellent, consistent service in the eyes of management customers, which is a prerequisite before anyone will truly pay attention to HR.


  • Failing to build a performance culture. CEOs are expected to be winners year in and year out. VPs of HR should be no different. They are expected to build a performance culture that develops a sense of urgency about performance within every manager and employee. When the press, colleagues, competitors and top management begin describing your culture as “performance-focused,” then the VP of HR has succeeded in his or her mission.


    Whether you are a midlevel HR professional or a current VP of HR, the time is now for you to begin acting like a future CEO. The errors you need to avoid are clear. And even if you don’t make it all the way to CEO, you might end up being the most effective and influential HR professional in your industry.

Posted on January 8, 2007July 10, 2018

Dissatisfied Workers on the Prowl for New Jobs in 2007

New Year, Old Problem: Most U.S. workers would gladly change jobs if the right opportunity presented itself, according to a survey of 5,300 adults by Yahoo HotJobs. Nearly two-thirds are open to switching jobs, with an improving job market cited as the chief cause for such optimism. If true, the figure suggests concern about worker retention could intensify as companies strive to keep turnover costs low in 2007. About 39 percent of those polled cite unhappiness with wages as the chief issue, with three-quarters of that group saying their 2006 raises or bonuses were below expectations. However, only 9 percent identified salary as a key indicator of success, with 46 defining success as the attainment of a proper balance between their jobs and personal lives. Also, more than 75 percent of employees are looking for new jobs, according to a survey conducted jointly by the Society for Human Resource Management and The Wall Street Journal’s CareerJournal.com. Apparently, job seekers will have choices in the coming year. Still another survey, this one by CareerBuilder.com, found that 40 percent of hiring managers plan to add jobs.


—Garry Kranz

Posted on January 8, 2007July 10, 2018

Quick Takes January 9, 2007

New Year, Old Problem: Most U.S. workers would gladly change jobs if the right opportunity presented itself, according to a survey of 5,300 adults by Yahoo HotJobs.
Click to read more. >>>

Diversity Deal: Capital H Group of Chicago has acquired a diversity training company.
Click to read more. >>>


Relocaton Merger: Primacy Relocation of Memphis, Tennessee, has acquired Foursquare Relocation for an undisclosed sum.
Click to read more. >>>


HR Software: HR software company Ultimate Software of Weston, Florida, has acquired RTIX Ltd., a British company that specializes in software for employee performance reviews and training.
Click to read more. >>>

HR Shakeout in U.K.: Payroll and HR outsourcing company Northgate Information Solutions, based in Chester, England, is acquiring Link HR Systems for about $24 million.
Click to read more. >>>


Vendor Roundup: Belfast, Northern Ireland-based ICS Computing says it is launching an HR outsourcing consulting service to complement its HR and payroll services offerings.
Click to read more. >>>

Posted on January 8, 2007July 10, 2018

Whats Behind the Wheel at Toyota

Former Secretary of Transportation Federico Peña says it should come as no surprise that Toyota Motor Corp.’s diversity program in North America—like its exploding profits—is a reflection of two bedrock philosophies: respect for people and haizan, Japanese for continuous improvement.


    Peña, a managing director in Denver at the investment firm Vestar Capital Partners, is a veteran member of Toyota’s Diversity Advisory Board, which advises company executives and serves as a watchdog for the company’s 35,000 U.S. employees.


    In the past five years, Toyota has far exceeded its targets and has increased its spending to a $1.2 billion annual commitment to diversity, he says. It focuses on key areas such as implementing philanthropy, job training, hiring and increasing the number of minority and ethnic dealers and suppliers.


    “Toyota made it into the Billion Dollar Roundtable, which is very prestigious,” he says. “It has built diversity into the whole company. It isn’t just a program. The entire culture supports it.”


    The Diversity Advisory Board, thought to be the only such group in the industry, was established in 2001. That’s when Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing North America Inc. developed a 10-year, $7.8 billion diversity strategy for minority-oriented business and philanthropy after a threatened boycott by the Rev. Jesse Jackson, who deemed a Toyota TV ad offensive to blacks.


    The seven board members are experts in the fields of diversity, public policy and economic development and include former Secretary of Labor Alexis Herman and former U.S. Reps. Jack Kemp and Susan Molinari.


    They meet four times a year and talk on the phone more frequently, Peña says, providing an outside perspective, helping to set a diversity strategy and working closely with management. The program was intended to go beyond a focus on compliance to help launch careers and fill the automotive dealership pipeline with diverse talent.


    A key diversity and inclusion initiative is Toyota’s Business Partners Groups, employees who collectively advance company interests and support employee development. One, the Diversity Champions program, charges outstanding employees with working at the grass-roots level to develop diversity and inclusion programs.


    Other business partners are TORQUE-Women’s Development and Empowerment, and TAASiA (Toyota Asian American Society in Alliance)—both of which were established in 2006—and older groups such as GALA (Gay and Lesbian [Bisexual Transgender & Friends] Alliance), the AAC (African American Collaborative) and TODOS (Toyota Organization for the Development of Latinos).


    “People don’t come to complain,” says Jennifer “Jae” Requiro, manager of the diversity consulting and inclusion strategies department. “And they don’t bring up issues without looking for solutions.”


    Toyota is the recipient of several honors, including the National Minority Supplier Development Council’s Corporation of the Year.


    Last spring, however, the top Toyota executive in the U.S., Hideaki Otaka, left his position after he was accused of sexual harassment by his former assistant. An undisclosed settlement was reached. In response, the company formed a special task force, led by diversity advisory board member Herman, to review the company’s harassment and discrimination policies.


    A company spokeswoman says the lawsuit resulted in “immediate actions to enhance training for (company) executives” and plans to strengthen and clarify its procedures for responding to allegations.


    “As a supplement to existing training, all executives of our North American affiliates are now required to undergo a special training program to enable them to better recognize, prevent and handle any instances of inappropriate behavior,” Toyota spokesman Steven Curtis says.


    In addition, Curtis says the policy requires that any allegation of harassment or misconduct be immediately investigated and reported to the executive’s superior—and each affiliate has now clarified its procedures to provide that if the chairman, CEO or president is involved, a report will be made directly to that executive’s board of directors.


    Peña points out that the issue of diversity is only increasing in importance. “The number of minorities—especially Hispanics and Asians—is exploding,” he says. “Today one-third of the population in the U.S. is minority. By 2050 about half the population will be ethnic minorities.”


    The company is paying careful attention to changing demographics and to driving diversity, he says. “It’s the Toyota Way. When they commit themselves to something, they do it.”


    That’s why it isn’t surprising that the company is on track to post record profits this year, Peña observes. In November, Toyota reported a 34 percent increase in its fiscal second-quarter profit and raised its full-year earnings forecast to more than $13 billion.

Posted on January 8, 2007July 10, 2018

Toyota Driving Diversity

Brent Loescher, a self-confident white male of 39, hardly looks like a poster child for diversity.

    At Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., his job title is operations design manager. But he also carries a badge that identifies him as a “diversity champion,” one of 138 out of Toyota Motor Sales’6,272 employees who serve as leaders at the grass-roots level to promote diversity and inclusion internally and at regional sales and distributor offices throughout the country.


    “The program is about developing strong work relationships, learning more about who you work with, their mind-set and experiences,” Loescher says.


    He began working at Toyota in New Jersey in 2001, and was deployed by the Army to serve a 14-month tour in Baghdad, working directly with Iraqis. Now a retired master sergeant, he says the military provided a “fantastic” background in diversity education, but that the training he received at Toyota has been singularly powerful.


    “It makes you explore yourself,” he says. “It’s the most mentally challenging and spiritually enriching experience I’ve ever had.”


    The champion program, which began forming in the late 1990s at Toyota Motor Sales’ headquarters in Torrance, California, is part of the auto giant’s $1.2 billion annual commitment to diversity. It operates separately from human resources and is run by a five-person “diversity consulting and inclusion strategies” unit. It works collaboratively with the University of Toyota and outside consultants to develop the training program, says Jennifer “Jae” Requiro, department manager.


    It works like this: Candidates who’ve proved themselves as outstanding employees with leadership skills are nominated and selected by managers and co-workers. Groups of 10 to 12 champions at a time begin their training at an intensive three-day seminar at company headquarters.


    A champion might be a sales manager in Massachusetts, a logistic services employee in Kentucky or an attorney in California.


    After the first three days of training, champions go back to their units for three to four weeks. They then return to the university for two more days of training.


    They are responsible for analyzing their workplace and developing action plans by asking questions such as: What’s going well in this unit? How much are people involved and engaged? Is there enough understanding and communication? Do employees generate and exchange ideas? How well do they know one another?


    Champions also meet with Requiro and other managers informally once every two months to discuss subjects ranging from new communication tools to best practices. They gather at headquarters once a year for a formal summit, and are required to submit a written report of the research they have conducted on their work cultures.


    If, for example, a champion reports back that there was an expressed need for career development, the diversity and inclusion unit works with HR, which might implement programs such as job shadowing, helping to create more teams or organizing informational interviews with managers.


    Since no two champions work with similar groups of employees and they often tackle very different cultural issues, Requiro says that the plans they initiate are highly customized. She estimates that champions devote from 5 percent to 15 percent of their time to the program.


    She points out that diversity champions are the cream of the crop and that the program has not only noticeably strengthened company culture, it has proved to be invaluable for employee development and leadership training.


    Like an increasing number of companies, the Japanese car manufacturer has a very broad definition of diversity and uses the word “inclusion” to place emphasis on commonality rather than difference.


    Requiro stresses that the program isn’t affirmative action. “It’s about how we react to change,” she says. “We have to understand different ages and generations. The baby boomer model, where everyone looks the same, doesn’t exist. Twenty percent of our employees, for example, are single dads. That is a diversity issue. Absolutely.”


    “We want to make sure our associates don’t have to leave themselves at the door,” Requiro says. “Our culture-change effort is to make sure all people’s talents are fully used and organizationally developed.”


    She had been an “inclusion specialist” in HR until eight years ago, when an executive vice president began developing the relationship-building and culture-change effort. It was decided that the role of human resources would be operational. HR would be involved in processes and policy. The diversity department would be more strategic, and would be responsible for a range of employees including auto dealers, administrators and managers, Requiro says.


    As one of the champions, Loescher says he develops strategies for helping employees change their perceptions. Before moving to Toyota Motor Sales’ headquarters last spring, he and a fellow champion developed a plan at an all-white, all-male parts distribution center in Kansas City, Missouri. The goal wasn’t to change demographics but to develop better communication and a strategy for building stronger relationships.


    He says there was distrust among managers and associates at the 37-person center, and difficulty getting associates involved in operations improvement, safety projects and even holiday planning.


    The inclusion strategy he helped develop includes open discussions at daily “breakout” meetings and an hourlong monthly meeting where 37 chairs are arranged in a circle in the cafeteria and every employee is given one minute to express an issue or concern. Meeting rules include an agreement not to blame others and to fully participate in resolving the problem.


    Before the new plan was implemented, there were employees who had worked together at the center for 30 years who didn’t know their sons were on the same baseball team. But the meetings have resulted in far more interaction throughout the center, Loescher says.


    “Everyone learns that it’s not just management that’s responsible for the workplace,” he adds. “At Toyota, we are a collective workforce.”


    The strategy has paid off. Several Toyota facilities recently have had to make major shifts in employee schedules to meet the needs of dealers who want to order parts later in the workday. That means asking center employees to begin their workday four hours later, a potentially significant morale problem.


    Thanks to greatly improved communication and trust at the parts center, however, Loescher says the transition has been easier than it has been at similar facilities.


    “It’s amazing how habituated we all are,” Loescher notes. “People get lost in cubicles all day. But when you know who you work with and make sure everyone is heard, it changes the way you think about solving problems.”


    At Toyota–which recently passed Ford to rank as the second-biggest automaker in the U.S. and is one of the world’s 10 most profitable companies–diversity and inclusion are among the top priorities, says Jerome Miller, vice president of diversity for Toyota Motor Sales. They are “integral to our business strategy and surely contribute to our company’s success.”


    “Our diversity champions promote inclusion and leverage workforce diversity at the grass-roots level,” Miller notes. “That’s where meaningful progress occurs.”


    In the 70-member legal services department, diversity champion Pamela Samuels says there is no question that bringing people together and brainstorming has resulted in changed perceptions and better dialogue between individuals and teams.


    She is a managing attorney who previously worked for a major defense contractor. She says her former employer brought in speakers and paid lip service to issues of diversity and inclusion, but hadn’t made a genuine commitment.


    Referring to the intensive training she has received at Toyota, Samuels says she was amazed by its impact. “I was blown away,” Samuels says. “I am African American and I figured there’s not that much I could learn. But we discussed questions like ‘How do you define yourself?’ and ‘Where did your racial views some from?’


    “It reaches you in your gut. People volunteered to share personal experiences,” Samuels continues. “I found out that one of my white co-workers has an adopted Asian child. If you know people, it gives you a new perspective of them. The other champion from my department is openly gay. I didn’t know her until we worked together as champions.


    “We’ve become very close friends. It’s been a big growth process for me.”


    Once a quarter, the general counsel now shuts down the entire legal services department for a day to promote diversity and inclusion and to share ideas and experiences. “The general counsel, Dian Ogilvie, personally comes to the meetings,” Samuels says. “That’s commitment.”


    Samuels says it’s important that white males are involved in diversity and inclusion programs, and not just people of color. “That defeats the whole purpose,” she notes. “Inclusion makes us all better.”


    Champions also have launched business partnering groups that address specific issues for women, Latinos, and African and Asian Americans to better understand workforce needs and to help develop diversity strategies. The groups have had a significant impact on the organization, Requiro says.


    Though Toyota is still in the process of developing metrics to measure business results, Requiro attributes higher sales in some locations directly to improved team development, and points to the company’s unprecedented low turnover of 3 percent as the best measure of employee satisfaction.


    Michael C. Hyter, president and CEO of Novations Group in Boston, says he believes that more companies are asking hard questions about quantifying the value of diversity programs. Still, he notes, “Just because specific measures don’t exist does not mean that the programs aren’t good. But the emotional ‘positives’ behind the effort have to be evident to the employees and leaders.”


    Toyota Motor Sales vice president Mike Morrison, who leads the University of Toyota, says they are definitely evident. “Diversity champions work on culture, which is important on the business side,” Morrison says. “We want to represent changing demographics and to create an equitable playing field. We do it because it’s good business. And it is the right thing to do.”


    At Toyota, diversity and inclusion go well beyond compliance. “We have to develop human resources–this is more important than anything,” Toyota president Katsuaki Watanabe has said. “We will also use the principle of genchi genbutsu, or ‘going to the source’ to evaluate our strengths and weaknesses.”


    That is what diversity champions are primed to do.

Posted on January 8, 2007July 10, 2018

New Initiatives From Vendors in Workforce Management

Vendor Roundup: Belfast, Northern Ireland-based ICS Computing says it is launching an HR outsourcing consulting service to complement its HR and payroll services offerings. … TotalRewards Software of Rocklin, California, has launched free online software to enable small and midsized employers to create total compensation statements for employees. … Indianapolis-based BrandoHR, a provider of branded recruiting tools, says it has formed a partnership whereby small and midsize companies can receive free automatic job postings from JobCentral, a job board created by DirectEmployers Association Inc., also of Indianapolis. … Cincinnati-based HRO provider Resolve Staffing Inc. has filed for a listing on the American Stock Exchange. Its shares are currently traded over the counter. … Employment screening company Verifications Inc. of Minneapolis says it will offer screening to help companies search state databases of sexual offenders. … HR software vendor Kenexa of Wayne, Pennsylvania, has expanded its presence in Malaysia by opening a product development office there. … Philadelphia-based benefits consulting firm Mid America Group is being acquired by Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. of Itasca, Illinois, which recently agreed to pay nearly $37 million to settle a class-action lawsuit alleging it accepted improper contingent commissions.



—Garry Kranz


Posted on January 5, 2007July 10, 2018

PBGC Takes Over Delta Pilots’ Pension Plan

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. has taken over and terminated Delta Air Lines’ massively underfunded pension plan covering the airline’s pilots.


The Delta plan, which covers about 13,000 active and retired pilots, is underfunded by about $3 billion, with $1.7 billion in assets and $4.7 billion in benefit obligations. The PBGC will be liable for about $920 million, the sixth-largest loss in the PBGC’s 32-year history.


Earlier, Delta said shedding the plan was essential for the Atlanta-based airline to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Delta, though, is continuing another pension plan covering other employees. A provision in a 2006 law gives commercial airlines much more time—compared to other employers—to fund their pension plans.


Delta is the latest major airline to have at least one of its pension plans taken over by the PBGC.


Among airlines now operating, the PBGC has taken over all of United Air Lines’ pension plans, costing the agency $6.6 billion; those sponsored by US Airways Group, at roughly a $3 billion loss; and Aloha Airlines, whose plans had $117 million in unfunded PBGC-guaranteed benefits.


The PBGC also incurred big losses through its takeover of pension plans sponsored by several long-defunct airlines, including Braniff International Airways, Eastern Airlines, Pan American World Airways and Trans World Airlines.


In all, about 38 percent of the PBGC’s $18.1 billion deficit is attributable to airline pension plan failures, according to a PBGC spokesman.


—Jerry Geisel


Jerry Geisel is a reporter for Business Insurance,
a sister publication of
Workforce Management.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress