Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on October 3, 2006July 10, 2018

Labor Relations Board Offers Split Decision in Supervisor Cases

Companies may start defining more workers as management–and ineligible for union representation–following a National Labor Relations Board decision announced Tuesday, October 3.


In a 3-2 ruling, the NLRB held that permanent charge nurses at Oakwood Heritage Hospital in Michigan should be designated as supervisors because they assigned tasks to other nurses, were responsible for their performance and exercised independent judgment.


In two related cases, however, the board found that nurses at Golden Crest Healthcare Center and lead workers at Croft Metals Inc. did not meet the Oakwood test.


“A lot of employers may make explicit in job descriptions the duties of lead people to qualify them as supervisors within the guidelines set forth in Oakwood,” says Michael Flaherty, a partner at the law firm Jackson Lewis in Chicago.


The NLRB used the three cases to respond to a 2001 Supreme Court ruling in NLRB v. Kentucky River Community Care Inc. In that action, the high court rejected the board’s reasoning when it upheld a union request to include six registered nurses in a bargaining unit. Supervisors are not allowed to join a union under the National Labor Relations Act.


In its October 3 decision, the board sought to clarify its interpretation of the latitude an employee must be granted to qualify as management.


The NLRB said that a nurse is a supervisor if he or she can place a colleague in a certain wing of the hospital, determine the time the person must arrive, authorize overtime and compel someone to come in from off-duty hours.


In addition, a nurse is a manager if he or she is accountable for the performance of other employees, evaluates them, influences their pay and exercises independent judgment beyond routine or clerical procedures.


“Employers should be satisfied because they have more clarity in what (responsibility) to give to individuals if they wish them to be a supervisor,” says James Redeker, chair of employment services at WolfBlock, a Philadelphia law firm.


But the NLRB may not have the final word on an issue that has been litigated for more than 20 years. Labor unions are likely to appeal the ruling in a circuit court.


AFL-CIO president John Sweeney said in a statement that the NLRB decision was the latest step by the Bush administration “to deny as many workers as possible their basic right to have a voice on the job and improve their living standards through their union.”


An Economic Policy Institute study asserts that as many as 8 million American workers may lose their bargaining rights.


Cheryl Johnson, president of United American Nurses, says that 843,000 nurses could be reclassified as supervisors. She maintains that the title is inaccurate because charge nurses cannot hire, fire or discipline their colleagues.


“Do you think for a minute that hospitals would have that many supervisors?” she asked at a September discussion at the Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C. “Hospitals know the difference. Only the NLRB seems to be confused.”


The NLRB ruling might also mean that computer scientists, engineers and other skilled employees could be defined as supervisors in today’s collaborative offices.


“It’s all about pushing authority down to frontline workers,” says Sarah Fox, a lawyer and former NLRB member. “It’s all about teamwork.”


—Mark Schoeff Jr.


Posted on October 3, 2006July 10, 2018

Creating Tomorrows Workforce Managing and Developing the Talent Pool

In April 2001, the Abu Dhabi Gas Co. and Abu Dhabi Gas Industries Ltd. merged to form Gasco, one of the largest gas-processing companies in the world. The new company, a joint-venture partnership between Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., Shell, Total and Partex, provided Gasco a chance to look toward the future and discover ways of making two good companies into one great one.

    Making this vision a reality required two things: having the right equipment to get the job done and building a culture that ensures the workforce is able to meet current and future business challenges. Not surprisingly, those challenges are a global phenomenon and a strategic concern for companies everywhere. Gasco then built a culture that focused on ensuring its people—the company’s most valuable asset–were up to the challenge.


Getting started
   From the beginning of the merger process, general manager Mohammed Sahoo realized that cultural change would require the support and involvement of the entire company. To start, senior managers from both companies attended a strategic workshop where they completed a strength, weakness, opportunity and threat analysis and discussed the new organization’s future. This led to the creation of a new vision and the development of an initial change strategy for the organization.


    Since the efforts needed to be easily identified by everyone in the company, the name Gasco 21 was adopted—for “Gasco in the 21st century.” Because the company was embracing the idea of continuous change with the ultimate goal of making the company vision a reality, a new slogan incorporated the principles that would help the company change from a good company to a great one: “The Gasco 21 Journey—Realizing the Vision.”


Creating a new culture
   Although branding the changes created awareness and buy-in, there was still a need for clear and substantial goals. Otherwise, it ran the risk of being seen as just another management fad. That is why the Gasco 21 Journey was designed to be a companywide initiative that promoted performance-centered change while increasing the company’s and the employee’s individual capabilities.


    Establishing this performance improvement culture would require more than printing and distributing vision and mission statements. To be successful, a systematic process was needed that would get the entire workforce involved with the change program. This was accomplished using focus groups and surveys to identify employee issues, concerns and areas for improvement. Employee involvement had two major benefits: The commitment level throughout the organization was enhanced, and future opportunities were identified.


    Thousands of comments, suggestions and ideas were collected from the focus groups that were sorted into eight major categories: performance; innovation; adaptability and learning; teamwork; open communications and transparency; health, safety and environment; family and community; and professionalism. These became Gasco’s cultural attributes, and they formed the foundation for the changes being introduced throughout the organization.


First, the leadership team
   Why start with the leadership team? In his book Good to Great, Jim Collins points out that business leaders feel one of their biggest limitations on successful business growth is the difficulty of attracting and keeping enough of the right people. Yahoo CEO Terry Semel is also an advocate of having a strong leadership team in place. He has stated that getting top people is his organization’s No. 1 concern, because the strength of the leadership team has a major impact on Yahoo’s overall success. Considering the new challenges Gasco faced after the merger, the executive committee wanted to ensure the current leadership team had the required skills to meet today and tomorrow’s business objectives. But what skills were needed?


    Leadership workshops were conducted at its headquarters and each operating plant to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the current team. The results of these workshops were the starting point for developing Gasco’s leadership curriculum. The management team was then asked to predict where they saw the organization in five, 10 and 15 years, to ensure that future competencies were included in the curriculum. Training and development activities were then designed to ensure that Gasco’s supervisors and managers would have the skills, knowledge and abilities to be successful. The leadership curriculum also created a pool of talented individuals who were ready to assume greater responsibilities in the company.


    The result of Gasco’s efforts was the creation of a leadership development program that supported the changes taking place under the banner of the Gasco 21 Journey while improving the employees’ capabilities and overall company performance. The leadership curriculum targets the five levels of management within Gasco: supervisors, section heads, department heads, division managers and executives. Within each of the levels, specific programs were created that prepared people for their new supervisory roles. Altogether, there are 22 programs available that range from time management through building stakeholder relationships. The intent of the leadership curriculum was to ensure that Gasco developed a reservoir of successors at every level with the ability to assume greater responsibility as positions became vacant.


    Recently, talent management has taken on a more significant role. In the 2005 Towers Perrin study “Talent Management: The State of the Art,” 40 percent of companies said they felt talent management was a “very critical issue” that needed to be addressed by senior management. In 2006, the Society for Human Resource Management Talent Management Survey indicated that 76 percent of HR professionals believed talent management was a top priority for their companies. The recent push toward talent management makes Gasco’s leadership curriculum efforts even more noteworthy. During the past two years, more than 3,000 employees attended leadership training sessions throughout the company.


Second, improving customer service
   Gasco also realized the merger created an opportunity to improve the skills and capabilities of the entire workforce, not just the management staff. Although this would be an ambitious undertaking, the potential benefits for the company were enormous. With this concept in mind, the Customer Service Journey was developed. The program’s goals were to promote the new cultural attributes while building a climate of trust, open communication and transparency.


    The plan called for half-day workshops that would be conducted at its headquarters and at each operating plant in order to get the maximum number of personnel involved. Since the audience would include support staff, technicians, operators, engineers and shift supervisors, the workshops needed to be designed to encourage participation and team involvement. The Customer Service Journey introduced a new theme each quarter. The first such theme was “Mind Leap,” which was designed to change the way people think while encouraging participants to focus on the company’s new culture. The exercises showed the value of using a cooperative approach, so by the end of the workshops, participants realized the benefit of working together.


    The other three themes introduced during the year included “Understanding Others,” “Listen Up” and “Pro-Act.” The Customer Service Journey was used as a structured program to gradually build the staff’s ability to understand their customers’ needs and work together in a proactive manner to deliver results. Interest in the workshops continued to grow quarter by quarter. By the end of the year, more than 1,400 had attended the programs. Feedback on the interactive sessions was extremely positive, and each workshop provided an opportunity to continue building grass-roots support for the new culture of performance centered change.


Third, understanding the business
   In the process of establishing the leadership curriculum and conducting the customer service workshops, it became apparent that a significant portion of the workforce was operating within silos and didn’t understand how their efforts affected the company’s overall success. This discovery resulted in the creation of a commercial awareness game to break down silos while improving performance and teamwork. Although the management team approved the concept of the game immediately, it took more than six months to create.


    The game was designed to explore Gasco’s business and operational environment. During the workshops the facilitator ensured each participant understood:


  • Gasco’s key stakeholders.


  • The hydrocarbon chain.


  • Gasco’s feed and products.


  • The company’s financial operations.


  • How different parts of the company work together.


  • The way incidents affect the entire company.


  • Key performance indicators.


  • Why key performance indicators are important.


    During a half-day workshop, delegates operating in cross-functional teams analyze business priorities and discuss challenges Gasco faces. The teams also look at the company’s budgets and revenues, then explore how operational incidents can affect Gasco in terms of money and key performance indicator achievements.


    During the first year, more than 1,000 people participated in commercial awareness workshops. Feedback clearly showed a greater understanding of business operations, an increase in team performance, and that delegates had fun while learning how to help the company succeed.


Measuring success
   Although Gasco implemented a comprehensive plan to introduce a culture of performance-centered change by improving the skills, knowledge and abilities of the entire workforce, many wanted the answer to one basic question: “How successful was the Gasco 21 Journey?”


    One factor is measuring the number of people involved with the development activities. Even though Gasco’s workforce consists of 3,500 direct-hire employees, shareholder representatives and contractors, more than 1,400 people attended the customer service workshops, and 1,012 took part in the commercial awareness programs. The leadership curriculum was even more impressive. During a two-year period, 200 individual sessions that consisted of 22 different lessons were held, and there were 3,325 participants. But did the changes taking place make a difference in the company’s bottom line? They did: By empowering the workforce, the company’s overall performance rose by more than 20 percent during the first three years of the journey.


Lessons learned
   The journey has become a vehicle that is moving Gasco forward as a larger, stronger and more effective organization by leveraging the strength of its people. By creating a culture that supports performance-centered improvement through the development of its workforce, the company has benefited in a number of ways.
 

Posted on October 2, 2006July 10, 2018

401(k) Fee Lawsuits Shouldn’t Scare Employers Into Low-cost Options

Employers received a wakeup call last month regarding how much they need to know about the fees being charged to participants in their 401(k) plans.


In September, the St. Louis-based law firm of Schlichter Bogard & Denton filed lawsuits against nine companies alleging that they violated pension laws by allowing their 401(k) participants to be overcharged by the managers of the plans.


The suits, which were filed in U.S. district courts in Illinois, California, Connecticut and Missouri, name Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, United Technologies, Bechtel Group, Caterpillar, Excelon and International Paper as defendants.


If successful, the suits could cause employers to shy away from higher-cost investment options for their 401(k) plans, but that’s not necessarily the right course of action to take, experts say.


In some cases, a fund with a higher management fee may still be a more sound investment because it has better performance than lower-cost funds over an extended period of time,” says Michael Maryn, a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal.


Plan sponsors need to determine whether the fees being charged are reasonable. That requires more analysis than many companies do today, says Don Stone, president of Plan Sponsor Advisors, a Chicago-based consulting firm.


“First they need to look at what other plans of their size are paying,” he says.


Record keepers and fund companies often will provide this information.


Beyond that, employers need to make sure that the costs of their 401(k)s and investment options “pass the reasonableness test,” Stone says.


“If you are paying for an actively managed fund and not getting the value of it, that’s a problem,” he says.


Determining whether fees are reasonable can be challenging, particularly with products like managed accounts, which are supposed to be customized to the needs of the investor, says Kyle Brown, a consultant at Watson Wyatt Worldwide.


Managed accounts often charge 25 basis points on top of the expenses of the underlying investments because they are customized to the needs of the investor, and thus are supposed to perform better than an average mutual fund. The providers of these options usually ask participants for information about themselves to customize the portfolio accordingly.


But what if an employer automatically enrolls employees into a managed account program–are those participants really getting all the benefits that the option is supposed to provide? Brown asks. “If the employee doesn’t fill out any forms, then the provider only knows their income, age and contribution amount,” he says. “If they don’t have more information to work off of, it might be difficult to demonstrate that the fees are reasonable.”


To address this issue, employers need to justify the decisions they make in choosing their investment options, says Martha Tejera, president of Tejera & Associates, a Bainbridge Island, Washington-based retirement consulting firm.


“If companies are choosing between providers, and one provider has higher fees, they need to ask why,” she says.


Some employers may decide to offer higher-fee investment options and just absorb the added expenses rather than pass them on to plan participants, says Maryn at Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal.


“Companies may reduce their fiduciary exposure by paying the expenses themselves,” he says. The result of that might be, however, that companies cut in other places, like their 401(k) match or other compensation or benefits.


No matter what happens with these lawsuits, employers should be prepared to deal with the issues involving understanding 401(k) expenses, Brown warns.


“Even if these suits don’t go through, the Department of Labor has projects in the works regarding understanding 401(k) expenses,” he says. “This is going to be an issue all employers need to pay attention to.”



—Jessica Marquez

Posted on October 2, 2006July 10, 2018

0610_Spectrum S&T

iVantage® Helps Engineer and Structure HR


S


aturn Electronics & Engineering, Inc. (Saturn) is a global supplier to original equipment manufacturers and their suppliers. Saturn’s highly innovative products are designed, engineered and manufactured worldwide for the automotive, appliance and communications industries. Headquartered in Auburn Hills, Michigan, Saturn operates 9 locations in Michigan, Texas, Mexico, China and Philippines. It has 1,300 full-time and 700 temporary employees.


Saturn works closely with its customers to provide integrated solutions that address complex design, engineering and manufacturing problems. Similarly, SPECTRUM has worked closely with Saturn to tailor iVantage® to meet their HR needs. “SPECTRUM does a phenomenal job supporting their clients and making them feel that they are number one. They are not happy until you are. Having worked with many SPECTRUM people over the years, they are consistently pleasant and truly dedicated to an exceptional product,” says Pam Glowacz, Saturn’s Human Resource Manager.


Interface or Integrate


Before iVantage, Saturn had an HR system through their payroll vendor. The system was never implemented because it did not transmit data over their wide area network (WAN) and it was difficult to integrate payroll and HR data. Even though they had integration issues, they initially wanted a new system that was fully integrated with one vendor.


SPECTRUM showed Saturn that it is possible to have a cohesive HR and payroll system with two different specialized vendors using an interface. Expert sourcing and best of breed are the philosophies behind interfacing an HR system with other needed applications. As a best of breed HR system vendor, SPECTRUM’s HR expertise is apparent in iVantage’s features and functionality. iVantage provides the essential tools HR departments need to track, filter and report employee data from application through retirement. It captures personal information, such as address, emergency contacts, background, and employment information, such as position, status, job history and compensation. Glowacz comments that, “iVantage is truly designed for HR professionals.”


Understanding that communication between Saturn’s HR data and payroll was imperative, SPECTRUM introduced iVantage Link™. Link impressed Saturn with its ability to take information stored within iVantage and share it with a multitude of systems — payroll, time and attendance, accounting and benefit carriers.


“iVantage Link has allowed us to streamline our processes and become the control center,” said Glowacz. She likes that all of Saturn’s employee data is housed and controlled in iVantage so that data integrity is maintained.


A Timely Installation


SPECTRUM’s Client Services team worked quickly and thoroughly with Saturn to have iVantage functional three months after the initial installation. This included the conversion of basic data, benefit plan set-up and implementing iVantage Link to communicate with Saturn’s payroll vendor. In addition, areas were tailored to meet the unique needs of their business. Five years later Glowacz remarks that iVantage is “truly the best system I have worked with, it has everything we need.”


Manager Self-Service


Since 2001, Saturn’s demands from their HR system have grown and SPECTRUM has provided the solutions. In the first half of 2006, they will implement the Manager Self-Service portion of iVantage for performance and salary review. Saturn’s current process is paper intensive and time consuming. HR sends forms and worksheets electronically to supervisors, who return hard copies of the completed paperwork. HR then keys the performance review scores and salary plans into the system. “Once Manager Self-Service is running, supervisors will key information themselves, which should be a wash on time for them. HR will benefit from the time saved by not re-keying all the data. The supervisors will also have so much more information at their fingertips,” said Glowacz.


Employee Self-Service


Looking forward, Saturn plans to add Employee Self-Service capabilities to streamline the benefit open enrollment process. Glowacz sees future opportunities with time tracking and time-off requests.


Lean Manufacturing — Lean HR


Saturn Electronics & Engineering continues to grow and adapt to the dynamic electronics, engineering and manufacturing markets. They have embraced a manufacturing concept, TPS, which simplistically means all activities add value or waste. The goal of TPS is to maximize value by eliminating waste. Glowacz feels that, “Administratively, HR has much to eliminate and iVantage, along with our partnership with SPECTRUM, will be the key to accomplishing that goal within our department.”


To learn more about SPECTRUM and how its fully functional HRIS, iVantage, can help meet your HR goals, please call 800.477.3287 or visit www.spectrumhr.com and sign-up for a free web-seminar.

Posted on October 1, 2006July 10, 2018

Workforce Management to Launch HR Job Board

Workforce Management will launch an online job board in early October that caters to the human resources market, offering news and information for recruiters and job seekers in addition to searchable help-wanted listings.


The site, which Workforce Management publisher Todd Johnson estimates will have 1,000 listings initially, will let job seekers search by title, keyword and salary range, among other criteria. Visitors will be able to navigate to the job board from Workforce.com, which already has 416,000 unique users, or go directly to it at WorkforceHRjobs.com.


The job board comes in response to consumer demand, Johnson says. In the past year, the No. 1 search term used at Workforce.com has been “jobs,” he notes, and the most frequently asked customer service questions have been about where users can post their résumés.


WorkforceHRjobs.com also reflects a trend that has emerged as the job-board market has matured. Recruiters increasingly rely on niche sites, whose listings target a specific audience. Ninety percent of the 40,000 job sites specialize in some way, estimates Peter Weddle, former CEO of Job Bank USA and publisher of a series of guides to job sites.


“Employers and hiring managers in particular are increasingly looking for specialization in individual skill sets, so job boards are becoming more niched and focusing on narrow cohorts of the workforce,” Weddle says.


Online recruitment advertising almost tripled in 2005, growing to $3.5 billion from $1.3 billion, according to Borrell Associates, a Virginia-based firm that tracks Internet advertising. Borrell attributes much of that growth to niche job boards.


There’s Dice.com, for example. The tech-focused site had 92,226 jobs posted on September 1, up from 75,097 on September 1, 2005, and 27,914 on September 1, 2003.


In its annual report on online recruitment advertising, Borrell notes that media companies have the advantage of offering access to online and offline candidates. Workforce Management will publish some job listings, particularly those for senior-level executives that are posted on WorkforceHRjobs.com.


Niche boards seem to be pleasing cost-conscious companies, too. Employers listed niche job boards as one of the top four best returns on their investment for recruitment efforts, according to a survey of 73 leading employers conducted by consulting firm Booz Allen & Hamilton for DirectEmployers Association, a consortium of more than 200 employers.


Because of its news and discussion forums, Workforce Management’s online listings will attract job hunters and passive prospects, Johnson says. “They may not be in the market right now for a job, so they wouldn’t necessarily be headed to a specific job board, but they may find something that appeals to them,” he says. “That’s really what companies are looking for: people who are happy where they are but are willing to move.”


Focusing on the human resources market allows the site to offer tools that simplify the process, such as drop-down menus of relevant certifications, Johnson says. To aid screening, employers will be able to ask applicants five questions. The site also will offer templates of typical questions for HR candidates. “All of that targeting,” Johnson says, “makes it pretty efficient in terms of information flow between the two parties.”


—Todd Henneman

Posted on September 29, 2006July 10, 2018

Labor Department’s Top Employee Benefits Official Quits, Returns to Private Sector

The U.S. Labor Department’s top employee benefits official will leave next month to return to the private sector, the agency has announced.


Assistant Secretary of Labor Ann Combs joined the Labor Department as head of the Employee Benefits Security Administration in May 2001, making her the longest-serving head of EBSA, which regulates more than 6 million employee benefit plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.


Combs was involved on behalf of the Bush administration in the negotiations that led to last month’s passage of comprehensive pension funding reform legislation, as well as the recovery of more than $220 million for Enron Corp. pension plan participants.


More recently, Combs guided the development of proposed regulations to help shield employers from liability for offering automatic enrollment in their 401(k) and other participant-directed defined-contribution plans.


Prior to joining the Labor Department, Combs was a vice president and chief counsel for pensions and retirement at the American Council of Life Insurers and a principal at William M. Mercer Inc.


President Bush has not announced a successor for Combs, who will depart October 27. The position is subject to Senate confirmation.


—Jerry Geisel
Geisel is a reporter for Workforce Management sister publication Business Insurance, where this article first appeared.

Posted on September 29, 2006July 10, 2018

HR’s New Strategic Role

These days, if you’re interested in a career in the human resources field, you’re going to hear an awful lot of talk involving the word strategy and its variations.


    It’s no longer enough to advise employees about benefits programs or post job vacancies. HR departments have to become strategic partners and practice strategic HR. Almost invariably, you’ll be told that the corporate HR positions of the future are likely to be reserved for HR strategists, and that if you hope to ever land one of those jobs, you’d better learn how to think strategically.


    “It’s a very popular word,” notes David Creelman, chief executive of Toronto-based Creelman Research, an HR consulting firm. “People throw it around a lot, even if they’re not quite clear about the meaning.”


    So what is strategy from an HR perspective, and just as important, how does one learn to become an HR strategist? Academics and consultants vary on the precise definition, but generally agree that strategic HR involves stepping outside the traditional duties of a corporate HR department and developing a broad understanding of what the larger company is trying to achieve, and how HR functions such as recruiting and talent development can be harnessed to help meet those larger goals.


    As for becoming an HR strategist, the experts say there isn’t a single path for everyone to follow. But future HR professionals can acquire the requisite knowledge, skills and experience from a wide variety of sources, ranging from MBA programs to volunteer work.


    “The best way to understand strategy is to think of it as mission-driven,” says Cathy Lee Gibson, director of the HR management program in Cornell University’s graduate business school, and author of several books.


    “You’re starting with the end in mind. Why does the company exist? What is it trying to achieve? From the top down, how do we align all our objectives and energies toward accomplishing that mission? The company doesn’t exist so that it can have an HR department; HR exists so that it can help the company meet its goal.”


    That’s the general concept, but there’s a lot more to it.


    Gautam Ahuja, professor of corporate strategy and international business at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business, explains that a company’s strategy is built from several main components: “What is the market in which the company is choosing to enter? Who is the customer? What are the opportunities and threats of a given environment? How does the company organize all its functions in order to compete successfully?”


    Consultant Creelman says those strategic decisions tend to involve the entire business over a long-term period, and the stakes usually are high.


    “When you’re thinking strategically, you shouldn’t just be thinking, ‘What is the effect next year?’ You should be looking three to 10 years down the line,” Creelman says. “And you don’t just look at how it affects your job or your department, but everything that every part of the organization is doing. One characteristic of strategic decisions is that they’re hard to undo. If you sell off the PC business, as IBM did, it’s not that easy to buy it back. Strategic moves always involve considerable risk—and a substantial payoff, or else you wouldn’t do them.”


    Benjamin Campbell, an assistant management professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, says that another element of strategy is understanding change and how to deal with it.


    “Competitive markets are dynamic,” he says. “Market conditions change, technology changes, competitors change. I think this is one area in which HR is really important but largely overlooked. You hear about companies changing their products or their production technology, but you don’t hear as much about how to change the workforce to support those things. That’s bad, because it’s people who make the products and develop the markets for them. In a dynamic environment, you need a dynamic workforce. You have to make sure you have the right employees with the right skills to support the strategic objectives of the company.”


    Since the goal of companies is to make money, finance is a business discipline that figures strongly in strategic thinking.


    “Strategic HR is being called upon more and more to measure the impact of human capital on business performance,” says John Chaisson, principal analyst for the Prophet Group, a New Orleans-based HR consulting firm. “In the past, when HR was called to provide metrics, it was looking at people as a cost factor for the organization–you know, what does it cost us to recruit someone? Today, the question is, what’s the return on each worker within our organization?”


    Chaisson says that as investors increasingly look at the impact of human capital upon a company’s market value, HR strategists will become increasingly important.


    “Factors such as the compatibility of teams, the loyalty and commitment of the workforce, the attrition rate–all these things are starting to figure in the due diligence that’s being done prior to mergers and acquisitions, Chaisson says. “Strategic HR players are going to be involved in the reporting of that information, and in understanding what it means.”


While some say that HR professionals must become strategic thinkers in order to prove their relevance, experts say it’s also true that HR can bring something to the strategy table that other players lack.


    “The conventional business strategist may not appreciate the subtleties of dealing with people and developing a good system for them,” says Wharton’s Benjamin Campbell. “I’ve heard a lot of anecdotal evidence of this in the corporate world–situations where the executive in charge of the technology strategy puts something in place, and then realizes, belatedly, that the company doesn’t have the right people to support the strategy.”


    So how does one prepare for playing a strategic role in HR? Some experts advise getting an MBA rather than an advanced degree in HR.


    “If you’re going to shape HR to support a corporate strategy, you first have to have a good understanding of the overall business model,” says Ed Lawler, founder and director of the Center for Effective Organizations at the University of Southern California. “That’s the sort of knowledge you start to develop with business school courses—finance, marketing, organizational design, business strategy.”


    But consultant Creelman thinks other, less orthodox academic routes can be useful for preparing a would-be HR strategist as well.


    “It may not seem as obvious as an MBA, but there are benefits to having philosophy or English literature at the master’s level, or maybe even a scientific field such as biochemistry,” he says. “All these fields involve a high level of abstract thinking, and the ability to understand complex systems and see both the details and the broad picture. All those abilities are very useful for someone who wants to do strategic HR.”


    The experts agree that having some non-HR experience on the operating side of the business is an increasingly significant credential for a would-be HR strategist.


    “I think it’s really important,” USC’s Lawler says. “The problem at bigger companies is that people tend to start in HR and stay in it, and then just do a single area of HR, such as compensation or training. They may not even understand the other parts of HR, let alone how the larger business works. So unless you started in on the operations side and rotated into HR, you’ve got to look for opportunities to get that operations experience. If you can’t get it at your own company, it may even be in your interest to take a different job at another firm for a while.”


    But if rotating into operations or taking a job elsewhere isn’t an option, there are other ways to get operations experience and develop a feel for how the larger enterprise functions.


    Even outside volunteer work can turn into a way to get operations experience, Cornell’s Gibson suggests.


    “Volunteering is a chance for people who don’t have hands-on experience to get some at low risk,” Gibson says. “The key thing is that you want to learn how to deliver a product or a service.”


    “Another thing you can do is hang around with people who think strategically,” Creelman says. “Any time that you have an opportunity to talk to a senior person in a strategy-level position or work with him or her, you should. You can pick up a lot by osmosis, just by listening to what kinds of questions they ask, by noticing what details they find interesting. You can get a better feel for the strategic worldview that way. Even if it means just sitting beside someone in the cafeteria and overhearing their conversation, you should do it.”


    Additionally, Creelman recommends that would-be HR strategists jump at any opportunity to interact with other departments or divisions, or with other companies. “Anything that gets you out of the narrow box of what you do daily—that’s going to help you develop a broader, strategic mind-set.”

Posted on September 29, 2006July 10, 2018

Firms in China Faced With Tight Supply of Skilled Labor

In the three decades since it opened its doors to the West, China has risen to become the world’s fourth-largest economy and its leading manufacturing base. In recent years, the country has faced shortages of steel, concrete, oil and even water as it struggles to maintain its rapid pace of development.


    But China may now face one of the most unlikely problems for a country of 1.3 billion people: a labor shortage. As the economy evolves and the demand for skilled workers and business leaders increases, new growing pains in China’s labor market are setting in.


    Reports of labor shortages first surfaced a few years ago and came primarily from China’s southeastern provinces. The issue gained more attention early this year when millions of migrant workers failed to return to work after celebrating the Chinese New Year. Many of these workers remained in China’s countryside, better able to carve out a living after the Chinese government abolished agricultural taxes and further liberalized markets for agricultural products.


    Others decided to find work in factories closer to home. Government initiatives to develop the country’s central and western regions are showing signs of success, as more companies are willing to set up shop in inland areas. Local governments have also offered cheap land, tax benefits and other perks to attract investment. Migrant workers are now able to find better-paying jobs closer to home, and companies in the traditional manufacturing areas along China’s eastern coast are finding it more difficult to find and keep good workers.


    Most analysts agree, however, that the changes in China’s unskilled labor force do not really constitute a labor shortage. Economic growth and new government policies have given Chinese workers more options, and some companies have to pay more and offer better conditions to recruit and retain workers. But the unskilled labor supply is still ample to meet demand.


    “The government has been trying to raise agricultural living standards and developing inland areas, so pressure to migrate to cities on the east coast to find a job has lessened a bit. Plus, the pay in some of the factories has been so low that some people found they made more money with farming,” explains Tamara Trinh, Deutsche Bank’s senior economist for Asia.


    “Some firms with relatively low pay in the Pearl River Delta region found themselves short of labor and had to raise their dirt-cheap wages and improve their working conditions somewhat. But with at least 150 million surplus laborers in the countryside and about 10 million new entrants into the labor market every year, I do not yet see the low-skilled labor market tightening significantly in the foreseeable future.”


    But China still has serious labor problems, Trinh says. “The market for skilled labor is a totally different story,” she says. “Skilled and experienced human resources are scarce for many industries and also in banking—especially experienced mana­gers. Those with experience working abroad are best but are also hard to find and expensive.”


    Evidence of this skilled labor shortage is easy to find. In the annual member survey conducted by the American Chamber of Commerce-People’s Republic of China, human resources trumped corruption, government bureaucracy and intellectual property rights to rank as the No. 1 concern for American firms operating there. Respondents also generally felt the situation was getting worse, particularly in terms of retaining good managers. A survey conducted by HR consulting company Hewitt Associates places the 2005 turnover rate at 14 percent, up from 8.3 percent in 2001. Wages increased by 8.4 percent in 2005.


    “The market for labor is hot in China,” says Jim Leininger, general manager of Watson Wyatt Worldwide in Beijing, “and it’s a seller’s market.” The demand for good managers reflects China’s economic growth, and both foreign and domestic companies play important roles in that growth. “As everyone knows, China’s economy is developing quickly. A substantial part that development comes from foreign direct investment.”


Driving up demand
   China Statistical Information & Consultant Center SSB, a division of China’s Statistics Ministry, estimates that almost 40,000 new foreign companies were set up in China in the first 11 months of 2005. These new foreign firms need managers and staff for their China operations. The new firms must compete with the tens of thousands of foreign companies already operating in China, as well as the increasingly competitive domestic firms, for many of the same job candidates.


    “At the same time that multinational companies are coming in, state-owned enterprises are reforming substantially, expanding overseas and listing on stock markets.” Leininger explains. “Historically, state-owned enterprises and multinational companies attracted very different types of workers. Now these labor markets are merging. Whether it is a foreign company that is entering China or a first-tier domestic player, they are all looking for the same type of talent: someone who is proactive, a problem-solver, creative and has international experience.”


    Finding that type of worker is not easy, despite the growing number of college graduates in China. The number of students in China’s universities has swelled in recent years, and many of the universities’ upcoming and recent graduates are still without jobs. Of the 4.1 million graduates this year, only 50 percent have signed contracts or agreed to take jobs. Another 27 percent are looking for jobs but have not found one yet. These students could seemingly provide a source of well-educated workers with management potential for Chinese and foreign companies.


    But the large numbers are misleading. Most of the recent graduates are not prepared for working in an international business environment. A gap exists in the skills demanded in the work environment and those taught in the country’s universities, according to Zhang Juwei, senior research fellow and professor at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.


    “Education and training are not meeting demand,” he says. “But you have to look at the reality of China. Thirty years ago the country was completely closed off to the world. Now, our students have to learn management skills based on the market rather than a planned economy. The point is no longer just about what you learn, but also how you can use what you learn. We are making progress, but we are still in transition.”


    Stella Hou, the Shanghai-based sales and accounts leader for Hewitt Asia Pacific, echoes Zhang’s comments.


    “China’s educational system focuses too intently on by-rote learning, rather than creative problem-solving,” she says. “The system is not reforming quickly enough. The curriculum is very academic, and skills training is lacking.”


Cultural conditions
   Historical and cultural factors further complicate China’s labor markets, according to Hou. In the 1960s and 1970s, many of China’s young people were sent to work in the countryside rather than attend university. The members of this group, sometimes referred to as China’s “lost generation,” lack the skills required for business management positions.


    “China’s history has a big effect on the leadership shortage, because of the lost generation,” Hou says. “The people of that age group generally learned Russian or languages other than English. Most did not go through university. So we don’t have the gray-haired business leadership that most countries do, and we can see the impact.”


    The problem of leadership goes beyond just age and experience. It is also one of short supply. A report from the McKinsey Global Institute estimates that Chinese companies will need 75,000 leaders during the next 10 to 15 years. Currently, it is estimated there are only 3,000 to 5,000.


    China’s one-child policy, which has been in effect for more than 25 years, is another demographic trend with effects on the labor force. Most recent graduates were born after the policy took effect, meaning that China’s young business workforce consists almost entirely of only children.


    Hou believes that the one-child generation may present some challenges for employers.


    “For employers, the question ‘What’s in it for me?’ constantly needs to be answered. Also, because they have no siblings, it may be more of a challenge for them to work in teams,” she says. “But they are very smart and quick to learn, and they are familiar with technology and the Internet. It will be a challenge for management to shift its paradigm, to understand how to cultivate and bring the strengths out of this one-child policy generation.”


    Not all the news is bad for China’s labor market. The McKinsey report suggests even minor improvements in China’s education system could have significant benefits. If China could increase the number of its suitable graduates from 10 percent to 25 percent, as it is in India, they could meet demand by 2008. The report recommends more financing for China’s universities and a stronger emphasis on language training to realize such results.


    Companies can also take action to better recruit and retain good employees, according to Leininger of Watson Wyatt, which conducts WorkChina, the largest study of employee attitudes in China. The results of this survey demonstrate that the companies best at fostering commitment in employees do so by going beyond competitive pay. They also have inspired leadership, communicate well about company goals and personal work issues, encourage teamwork in smaller groups and across departments, and offer opportunities for employees to use and develop skills on the job.


Workforce Management, September 11, 2006, pp. 37-38 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on September 28, 2006July 10, 2018

Candidate Sourcing

Ready for the Big Time
An innovative recruiting and development program–candidates are hired via an NFL-style draft–helps National Oilwell Varco build its next generation of leaders.


Dipping Carefully Into the Applicant Pool
Employee referral programs and selective campus recruiting may touch off discrimination charges.


Recruiting on the Right Side of the Law
“Creative” recruiting and hiring candidates with the “best fit” open the door to discrimination charges.


When Brand Alone Isn’t Enough
Big-name firms like McDonald’s and American Express find they have to do more to sell themselves in order to attract the right job candidates.


Dear Workforce: How Do We Ramp Up Hiring in a Suddenly Tight Labor Market?
The first step is to develop a sound recruiting plan, including accurate job profiles and a sufficient number of recruiters.

Posted on September 28, 2006July 10, 2018

Background Checks

Use Care When Conducting Pre-Employment Tests
Tests can help to reduce the guesswork inherent in hiring, allowing workforce managers to be more confident in the employee selection process.


Dear Workforce: How Do I Recruit Honest and Talented Workers?
Project a model of how talent and honesty can work together in your company.


Dear Workforce: What Questions Should We Ask During Assessments?
Understand what you seek to measure for each employee being assessed. Start with a good needs analysis that ties objectives to specific organizational goals.


Dear Workforce: How Do We Avoid Subjectivity in Pre-Employment Tests?
Make sure you understand why you’re using these tools. Use them in conjunction with other measures when assessing potential employees.


Employee Surveys: Ask the Right Questions, Probe the Answers For Insight
Used properly, employee surveys can help identify gaps between a company’s goals and its actual policies.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress