Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on May 12, 2006July 10, 2018

Weyerhaeuser Speedy Workforce Overhaul

Weyerhaeuser leaders didn’t have to mess with success. By 2004, the company’s residential wood products division could boast of $8 billion in annual sales and 15,000 employees scattered across four time zones.

   But they recognized some worrisome fissures. Cultural rifts persisted in the wake of several high-profile acquisitions. Five businesses fell under the division’s umbrella, competing for and confusing customers. Meanwhile, the home building industry was rapidly consolidating.

   Leaders have responded with what they describe as the company’s largest strategic overhaul in recent memory. The goal: to prove that entrenched work habits can be gutted to build a new strategic framework—one house at a time.

   If all goes well, the new organization—unveiled in April under the name iLevel—will have achieved more than a massive consolidation of five businesses into one. iLevel leaders will have also reshaped the long-term goals of employees to better court and retain customers.

   “It’s a pretty daunting task,” says Allan Bradshaw, the wood products division’s director of human resources, who led the change process. “But people rise to the occasion. People can do more than they think they can.”

   Rather than selling wood products piecemeal, Weyerhaeuser officials want to be considered the one-stop location for all of the innovation and products required to construct residential home frames—joists, beams, floors and all. To achieve that, Weyerhaeuser, long a product-driven company, must learn to operate more like a service company, responsive to the subtleties of customer demands. The company, located near Seattle in the community of Federal Way, Washington, celebrated its 100th anniversary in 2000.

   “The cultural piece has probably been our biggest challenge,” says Kurt Liebich, vice president of marketing. “I think everyone understands what we are trying to do and supports it. But people still slip back into the old language and the old behaviors.”

   Speed rules. In just 12 months—from January to December of 2005—the 11-member business leadership team was selected and the entire workforce restructured. The bulk of the changes occurred during the latter six months, when the business leadership team picked the next several levels of managers, called “transition agents.” Together, they educated employees about the reorganization and worked through a 178-item action plan to launch the new organization internally in January.

   Among the steps they took: retraining the strategic sales force, developing a new glossary of terms and creating an online game and employee DVD to highlight the division’s new strategic direction. With the help of a consultant, the business leadership team and 300 transition agents gathered weekly in an online discussion room to update their progress and address any concerns.

   “It’s really hard when you are sitting at the top of a 15,000-person organization—everything gets filtered,” Liebich says. “The question is, how do you cut through all of the filters and really understand how people are feeling?”

   Bradshaw, who got involved in 2004, participated in everything from strategy meetings to the selection of iLevel’s business leadership team. Together with Lee Alford, the leader of iLevel, he reshaped the residential wood products division without gutting it.

   There were only 108 job losses, mostly related to merging the sales forces, Bradshaw says. Still, creating iLevel has required creative destruction, touching nearly everyone in some way.

   “When we dissolved the old organizations, we didn’t give them (the employees) a home to go back to,” says Alford, senior vice president of residential wood products. By launching a new organization from scratch, “We removed the familiar,” he says.

   This big-concept thinking occurs against the backdrop of a home building industry skittish about skilled labor shortages and a possible housing bubble. The National Association of Home Builders has predicted that total housing starts, which reached a little more than 2 million in 2005, will decline 7.2 percent this year.

   Housing pressures are another reason not to dally, says Alford, part of Weyerhaeuser’s senior management team. “We think in some ways this is an opportune time to demonstrate how we can add services that save the dealers and home builders time and money,” he says. “And, at a time that they’ll need it, because they will be in a price squeeze.”

Labor challenges
   To illustrate how home building has changed, Weyerhaeuser officials frequently point to the television show Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, which the company helps sponsor. Each episode features the rapid overhaul of a home made possible by transporting preassembled materials to the lot, reducing the need for carpenters and other skilled laborers.

   “Home building is such a margin-driven industry,” says Steve Shook, associate professor of forest products marketing at the University of Idaho in Moscow, Idaho. “The manufacturers know that the only place the builder can increase their margin is by lowering their labor costs.”

   Finding skilled labor these days isn’t easy. A survey of 427 builders conducted in October by the National Association of Home Builders found that nearly half—47 percent—were having at least some difficulty locating skilled carpenters.

   At the same time, small home-grown builders are rapidly being overshadowed by large companies capable of raising thousands of new roofs annually. In November, Fort Worth, Texas-based D.R. Horton boasted that it had closed more than 50,000 homes in a single fiscal year.

   With its own significant scale, Weyerhaeuser hopes to entice labor-sensitive builders with preassembled materials and other products that can shave time on-site.

   Weyerhaeuser’s purchases of Canadian forest products company MacMillan Bloedel in 1999 and Portland, Oregon-based Willamette Industries in 2002 added mills and other production capacity, Bradshaw says. The acquisition of Trus Joist in 2000 beefed up research and development.

   By 2004, several of Weyerhaeuser’s residential wood products division’s product lines, including engineered wood and soft lumber, led all or nearly all of its competitors worldwide. Its sales revenue last year comprised slightly more than one-third of Weyerhaeuser Co.’s $22.6 billion.

   But the acquisitions introduced differing decision-making styles and even a mishmash of corporate language. The five businesses largely operated independently, with their own product allegiances and tracking their own profits and losses.

   “They had their own sales forces,” Bradshaw says.

   Weyerhaeuser leaders haven’t wasted time paring down the workforce, which peaked at 64,000 employees following the Willamette purchase. The company now employs about 47,000 people after a series of mill closures in Washington state, Arkansas and other locations. Prior to creating iLevel, “we had already trimmed ourselves of the nonproductive assets,” Bradshaw says.

   The question was, how best to maximize their acquired strengths? “We said, ‘We have the potential to offer a whole framing solution—the bones of the house,’ ” Bradshaw recalls.

Creative destruction
   The frame of the new organization started being erected in January 2005, when six cross-functional teams were formed, comprising 10 or so people per team—all experts pulled from different areas of the company.

   Each team was assigned to develop a proposal for redesigning sales, manufacturing or another function of the new venture. They were directed to work in confidence and to be creative.

   “Rather than start with the org chart, we said, ‘What are all the things that need to be done, for example, in sales?’ ” Bradshaw says. “We developed about 10 different options for how we could organize sales.

   “Then we evaluated each option against a set of criteria to determine which option provided the best return for the company.”

   The five leaders of the affected businesses evaluated the final proposals along with Bradshaw, Alford and several other key leaders. It was sometimes an uncomfortable process, Bradshaw recalls.

   “There was a lot of discussion and debate,” he says. “You have to remember that these five leaders, they all had long careers. They had run successful businesses. They had a lot of stake in tearing down the business walls and reassembling them into one integrated business.”

   Meanwhile, Alford and Bradshaw were engrossed in selecting the nascent organization’s new leadership. Weyerhaeuser’s senior management team wanted fresh blood for the new venture, Bradshaw says. The process was assisted by retirements; three out of the five leaders announced they would be leaving. “We started with a blank sheet of paper,” Bradshaw says.


“It’s a pretty daunting task. But people rise to the occasion. People can do more than they think they can.”
–Allan Bradshaw, director of HR,
wood products division

   
    In early July, when the 11-member business leadership team was introduced, they were immediately given a new charge: Within the next 90 days, they would select the next several levels of management.

Motivating employees
   In October, the 300 newly selected managers gathered in Chicago for a three-day meeting where they learned about their role. Their mission: to educate and energize fellow employees about the business case for launching a new venture.

   “We’ve learned through acquisitions that in a massive change effort you need to have transition agents,” Bradshaw says. The team used the term “transition agent” instead of the more traditional “change agent,” he says, to signal that the overhaul would have a beginning and an end.

   “Those 300 people who came together in Chicago had three months to go out and tell the story, generate commitment, empower people to change their processes and get the organization in place on January 1,” Bradshaw says.

   “Using transition agents was one of the concepts championed by Leland Russell, a consultant hired last summer to “look over our shoulder,” as Alford puts it, “to challenge us that we’re doing the right thing.”

   Russell advocates speed where organizational change is involved. Moving quickly provides a faster financial and strategic payoff, says Russell, president of Newport Beach, California-based Geo Group Strategic Services. (The Geo Group and design firm Hornall Anderson were the only two outside consultants used throughout the iLevel reorganization, Bradshaw says.)

   “The faster you move, the less chance for systemic resistance,” Russell says. “The status-quoers don’t have time to get organized.”

   Reorganization depends upon intracompany collaboration, gumming up the effort, Russell says. “It’s very, very difficult to move fast.”

   To boost efficiency, Weyerhaeuser purchased access to Geo Group software so the 300 transition agents could meet weekly, gathering online in 30 groups of about 10 people each.

   Every Monday the topics were distributed, and the groups would meet online the following day with the assistance of human resource facilitators. By Wednesday, Bradshaw and the facilitators were holding their own meeting to summarize feedback. The leadership team convened Thursday to take action and develop topics for the following week.

   The transition agents were particularly helpful in relaying employee concerns, Bradshaw says. Once an employee DVD was developed, they hosted numerous meetings to show it to employees and answer any questions.


“When we dissolved the old organizations, we didn’t give them (the employees) a home to go back to. We removed the familiar.”
–Lee Alford, senior VP,
residential wood products

   Issues did bubble up. An online computer game had been created to teach employees more about iLevel’s strategic focus, but 15 percent of employees don’t have easy access to computers at work, Bradshaw says. Plus, the transition agents were not impressed with their trial run of the game, complaining that it was plagued by technical glitches.

   “They were advocating that we shoot the game,” Liebich says.

   In the end, the technical problems were fixed. An off­line game, with a booklet of puzzles and questions, was developed to reach the remaining employees.

Positioning iLevel
   Many companies before Weyerhaeuser have attempted to move from a product focus to a solutions-based mind-set, says Nathaniel Foote, managing director for TruePoint, a consulting and research firm in Waltham, Massachusetts. “But the track record is not very good,” he says.

   Employees with product strengths may not adapt well. In product sales, Foote says, “all of your instincts are about maximizing your own profit in the transaction. If you move to solutions, you want to build customer loyalty and your share of the customer wallet.”

   The ripple effect extends far beyond the sales department, he says. Manufacturing may need to produce a more complex line of products to keep customers happy. Employee evaluations should be based on new criteria, such as retaining customer loyalty over time.

   “This is a pretty dramatic shift for Weyerhaeuser,” says Foote, who met informally with wood products leaders early in the reorganization process.

   In recent months, Weyerhaeuser has been retraining its strategic sales force, about 250 employees, to approach customers with solutions in mind. It is a consultative selling approach, says Rob Taylor, vice president of lumber technologies.

   Never again, he says, will a salesperson merely sell 10 orders of lumber. Instead, they will discuss the builder or dealer’s long-term needs for wood and other products. Ideally, better collaboration will help both the customer and Weyerhaeuser, Taylor says. “The more we are able to predict the demand, the better able we are to plan against it and deliver against it.”

   For some on the strategic sales team, the new approach also has required a return to the basics, with a crash course in the nuts and bolts of home construction, Bradshaw says. “We want them to know how a (home) frame gets built and how the components interact in that frame.” With that newfound knowledge, he says, “what we want them to do is help our customers find solutions that make them money.”

   To signal its new organizational focus, Weyerhaeuser hired Hornall Anderson Design Works to study branding issues. Once it was determined that a new name was required, the Seattle-based design firm worked through some 700 possibilities, says Hornall marketing director Michelle McRae.

   Last summer the business leadership team gathered, listening intently as Hornall representatives clicked through a PowerPoint presentation, building to the unveiling of the organization’s new name: iLevel.

   “And you could have heard a pin drop,” Bradshaw recalls. “We all said, ‘What is iLevel?’ “

   They soon recognized that the name had legs, with the “i” embodying many of the new venture’s strengths: innovation, integrity, integration. “And a level is a No. 1 tool for a builder,” Bradshaw says. “Level means quality. It means honesty. That we’re going to level with you.”

   Wearing a name, McRae says, is like donning a new coat. “It’s an empty vessel and you have to fill it full of meaning.”

   With the five businesses now operating as iLevel, employees are committed to raising the roof on customer loyalty and, they hope, everyone’s bottom line as well.

Workforce Management, May 8, 2006, pp. 1, 28-36 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on May 10, 2006July 10, 2018

Global Views in Retirement’s Future

American and overseas workers, realizing they’ll probably live to ripe old ages, agree they need to save more money to pay for their retirement. Now, they want government to help them by imposing required retirement savings during their working years.


    Workers surveyed globally chose that as the best way to get needed retirement funds over three other ideas: increasing the retirement age, raising taxes or reducing pensions.


    Such is one of the several stark findings of a newly released study by London-based bank HSBC titled “The Future of Retirement: What the World Wants.” The study surveyed 21,000 people and 6,000 companies in 20 countries.


    The study generally found a global desire by workers to have a productive and self-sufficient retirement, but that business has been slow to help them realize those wishes.


    Forty-three percent of workers surveyed globally said they want to fund their own retirement through savings or by working part time during retirement. But the study also found a contradiction in responses from nearly half the surveyed global employers. While they claimed to value older workers, the study found no systems in place, such as flexible work hours, to attract or retain them.


    Over the long haul, say the study’s authors, such conditions can endanger continuity of a corporate culture and result in a companywide drain of experience and skills among its workforce.


    Fifty-one percent of U.S. employers surveyed in the study, for instance, said they saw no urgency to recruit older workers, while 33 percent of overseas companies responded likewise. Thirty-one percent of U.S. employers responded with “no need,” as did 30 percent of global employers.


    “It’s surprising,” says Geoffrey Brooks, New York City-based retirement services chief for HSBC Bank USA. “I expected employers would more actively try to keep older workers.”


    But employers, says Brooks, may be well advised to “walk the walk” to meet the needs of older workers. The reason, he says, is the radically changing face of global demographics. They show the huge baby boomer generation nearing retirement happening concurrently with reduction in global fertility rates. The long-term effect, he says, is a shortage of younger workers coming into the workplace to replace experienced workers ready to retire.


    “They’re not feeling that pain yet,” Brooks says. But over the next three to five years, when a much larger chunk of the boomer generation has retired, he predicts employers will be forced to accommodate older workers.


    Meanwhile, the HSBC study revealed for the first time global agreement among workers on their need for government help in forcing them to save for retirement, Brooks says.


    The expectations of longer lives, along with limitations of current retirement savings plans are the biggest factors. Private-sector pensions are being phased out in the United States and United Kingdom, and have become essentially for public-sector workers only.


    Private employment retirement plans such as 401(k)s and individual retirement accounts are noncompulsory savings plans in the U.S. Meanwhile, the U.S. government takes Social Security from workers’ checks to enable their receipt of retirement payments, but the system seems to generate only supplemental funding.


    Sarah Harper, director of the Oxford Institute of Ageing in England, says the HSBC study shows workers are now aware of their longevity, and of the need for lining up adequate retirement funds. Opting for compulsory savings, she adds, is the workers’ admission that they aren’t very good at saving money.


    Politicians in Europe have been reluctant to introduce such savings law, fearing a backlash, she says. “But now, one-third of the population is saying, ‘We need help.’ So we’re saying don’t be scared to push (retirement) savings.”


    Like Brooks, Harper stresses that the demographics of the world are undergoing a fundamental and profound shift. But, she says, the biggest factor isn’t the aging boomer workforce. It’s because worldwide, women are having fewer babies, or opting against motherhood outright, as they pursue careers.


    That has triggered a global population shift of more people over age 60 than there are under age 15. This unprecedented trend began 10 to 15 years ago, she says, as women worldwide saw and pursued more workplace options.


    “That shift,” Harper says, “is here to stay.”

Posted on May 10, 2006July 10, 2018

America’s Job Bank Gets Laid Off

The Labor Department sent a notice to state officials earlier this year saying the benefits of America’s Job Bank “no longer outweigh the costs of operating and maintaining this system. Therefore, AJB will be phased out during the next 18 months and cease to be operational on June 30, 2007.”


The notice argued that maintaining and improving the site no longer makes sense “given that AJB duplicates what is already available in the private sector.”


That logic rings true to Peter Weddle, recruiting analyst and executive director of the International Association of Employment Web Sites industry group. Weddle says the Labor Department is wise to shutter America’s Job Bank because it replicates services offered by a range of private-sector sites. These include sites targeted at lower-wage and blue-collar workers, says Weddle, whose association includes the major job boards CareerBuilder.com, Monster.com and Yahoo HotJobs.


“Why should the government duplicate what the private sector is providing already?” Weddle says.


But shutting down America’s Job Bank will be a major blow to employers and job seekers, says Gerry Crispin, co-founder of job-site consulting firm CareerXroads. Crispin says the site has been a way to aggregate all the job postings of some 2,000 state employment offices around the country, giving smaller, local employers the ability to broadcast their jobs nationwide for free. And the AJB site is often used by lower-skilled people who turn to state employment offices, he says. Those people may have to rely on a fragmented network of state job sites or private-sector job boards that will not have all the job listings that employers currently give to America’s Job Bank, Crispin says.


“We are basically losing a public resource that provides job seekers a more convenient and easy way to identify the employers who were local and had smaller budgets,” he says.


America’s Job Bank dates to 1995, and the free site currently lists more than 2.1 million jobs and more than 682,000 résumés. But it has been criticized as difficult to use. The Labor Department said in a notice that the cost of operating AJB has been as high as $27 million a year, but that “AJB has not been able to keep up with private-sector job boards or industry standards regarding up-to-date technology.”


The slated closure of America’s Job Bank could force both companies and states to change the way they do business. Idaho, for example, enticed employers to list jobs on its state job bank with the promise that the listings would get on the better-known America’s Job Bank site.


“We’ve used the national distribution of job postings through AJB as a promotion,” says Bob Fick, communications manager at the Idaho Commerce and Labor Department.


America’s Job Bank also has been used by companies as a way to abide by the guidelines of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Weddle wrote in an online newsletter last month.


“Because this site was operated in conjunction with state employment agencies and open to all U.S. citizens, posting an opening there was a de facto commitment by the organization to consider any qualified person, regardless of their race, ethnicity, age, gender, religion or sexual orientation,” Weddle wrote. “The openings may have also been posted on other job boards or on the employer’s own Web site, but as long as candidates from America’s Job Bank were considered, the government was (usually) content that the company had made a conscientious effort at compliance.”


An alternative for demonstrating a good-faith effort at EEOC compliance, Weddle wrote, is posting jobs on a variety of sites, including general-purpose employment sites and “diversity” sites such as those that specialize in candidates of a particular race.


The notice sent to state officials said that during the past two years, the Labor Department’s Employment and Training Administration had reviewed and evaluated the ongoing viability of maintaining a national job site. “Since the launch of AJB, the number of private-sector Internet-based job boards (Career Builder, Monster, Yahoo! Hot Jobs, etc.) has proliferated, calling into question the need for a Federal government-sponsored job board,” the notice said.


The notice, titled “The Phase Out of America’s Job Bank,” also said: “The cost of operating AJB has been as high as $27 million per year, with a current operating budget for maintenance-only of $12 million per year… . The cost to maintain AJB and constantly upgrade the foundational technology and make improvements to the site is no longer justifiable given that AJB duplicates what is already available in the private sector.”


The notice said the Labor Department has developed an initial transition plan “to ensure that states and other entities, which currently utilize the AJB platform as part of their suite of services, are able to plan and make changes accordingly.”


It also indicated that the federal government could contract with a private-sector employment Web site to create some kind of national job board in the future.


“The (Labor) Department recognizes there will be a periodic need for a national job board due to unique circumstances, such as the recent dislocations related to the hurricanes in the Gulf Coast,” the notice said. “It is the Department’s assessment that it will be more cost effective to contract for this type of service with the private sector on an ‘as needed basis.’ “


In addition to the notice, the Labor Department also sent state officials a set of questions and answers about the phase-out.


Workforce Management received copies of the two documents from Ted Daywalt, president of private-sector job board VetJobs. Daywalt said he received them from a contact who works in the U.S. Labor Department, and that the documents were sent to state officials. Daywalt declined to identify his contact.


The U.S. Labor Department confirmed the documents were authentic and sent to state workforce administrators in March. In a statement, the department also said a conference call on the subject was held with state workforce administrators on March 17. The department did not respond to a request for further comment.


Although the demise of AJB amounts to a headache for Idaho state officials, it is a relatively minor one, Fick says. Of greater concern, he says, are cutbacks in federal grants for programs such as unemployment insurance and workforce training. “It’s another problem, but in a long list of problems,” he says.


In Crispin’s opinion, the loss of America’s Job Bank adds to the economic insecurities faced by many Americans, and is likely the result of political lobbying.


“It’s simple greed on the part of job boards and newspapers who have always feared that a free site will hurt them,” he says.


Weddle, though, says he had no knowledge that the decision to close America’s Job Bank was based on any lobbying. He also noted that there still are other free job-posting sites, such as Craigslist.


Weddle gives the government credit for launching the site more than a decade ago and helping to spark the online job board field. “It was so successful that it spawned a $2 billion industry,” he says.


—Ed Frauenheim


Workforce Management editorial researcher Yasi Jahed contributed to this report.

Posted on May 10, 2006July 10, 2018

The Art and Science of Recruiting a Diverse Workforce

No matter what the reasons are for why employers are trying to bolster diversity in the workplace, one thing is certain: Recruiting minorities is a crucial challenge.


    With the prospect of aging baby boomers retiring and the desire to reflect the increasingly diverse U.S. population, employers will have to rely on minorities more than ever. Collectively, African Americans, Hispanics and other minority groups make up 30 percent of the overall population, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.


    Perhaps this is why diversity is a serious matter at large companies, such as American Express.


    The company, which has 66,000 employees worldwide, systematically targets minorities at colleges with diverse student populations, reaches out to ethnic organizations and sponsors mentoring programs for minorities, says Henry Hernandez, chief diversity officer for the financial services provider in New York. Kenneth Chenault, chairman and CEO of American Express, in 2001 became the first African American to head a Fortune 500 company.


    But diversity for diversity’s sake is not the only reason why companies strive to develop a mixed workforce, says Steve Pemberton, chief diversity officer and vice president for Monster Worldwide, a New York-based online recruitment specialist.


    Employers are also attracted to the fattening wallets of minority consumer groups. Hispanics alone have a purchasing power of almost $700 billion, according to HispanTelligence, a market research specialist.


    Some companies believe that having a diverse workforce facilitates their understanding of minority groups and provides a leg up on the competition when vying for market share, says Martha Ceja, manager of diversity services at Bernard Hodes Group, a talent consulting company based in New York.


    But developing a diverse workforce is easier said than done. Minorities are grossly under-represented in strategic and influential positions in American corporations, according to statistics from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In addition, other issues, like recruiting and retention, also pose big hurdles in diversity management.


    There is no silver bullet for these issues. But the consensus among workforce experts is that if employers really want to tip the scale in their favor, they are going to have to adopt diversity management as part of their mainstream strategy.


    “Companies cannot view diversity as just another program or initiative–it has to be a way of life,” Ceja says.


Going grass-roots
    Working the job fair circuit is not always a fruitful endeavor. While these venues often bring employers and minorities together under the same roof, they do not guarantee that qualified candidates will apply for a job, or, for that matter, even show up at a company’s booth.


    In the grueling game of recruitment, the only foolproof method of success is having a strong corporate image, one that fires up candidates into seeking an employer out by name before actually setting foot in a job fair.


    “The days of participating in job fairs without additional support are over,” Pemberton says. “Smart employers are competing for top-of-mind access among candidates.”


    Offering free pens and stress balls will not help employers attain this goal. But grass-roots efforts and fostering partnerships with ethnic communities could do wonders. Sponsoring special events like parades, Little League games or concerts not only raises awareness about a company, but also lends more credibility to its efforts, Ceja says. “It lets minorities know that an employer cares about their community.”


    A coalition of employers in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, including Rockwell Collins Inc. and Alliant Energy Corp., is doing just that. The group is reaching out to cultural and social institutions as well as to businesses and churches in hopes of learning more about diversity and attracting minority talent to the area.


    Entrenching roots in communities is also good because it puts employers in direct contact with influential leaders, which can help to breed a positive image. Many of these leaders can be found in organizations for professionals, such as the National Society of Hispanic MBAs or the National Black MBA Association.


    Sometimes it is the special touches that can make a difference. Merck & Co., known for its creative approaches in reaching out to minorities, hosts mixers for professionals at special locales, such as the African American Museum in Philadelphia. For its part, The New York Times lends its conference space to key professional associations looking for a place to meet after business hours. These are effective ways to establish rapport and collect contact information in a more intimate setting, experts say.


    Employee referral programs are also useful for spreading favorable word-of-mouth about a company. However, employers don’t always get the desired results from these initiatives because they provide little guidance or few meaningful incentives. Human resource leaders have to be proactive in this arena–for instance, by giving employees tips on where to look for potential referees.


    If a worker is a member of a professional organization, such as the Association of Women Industrial Designers, managers can suggest this as an appropriate venue for finding potential candidates. Another way to inject momentum into these referral programs is to offer employees rewards for meeting certain referral goals.


    Aside from grass-roots efforts and the employee referral programs, employers can also rely on good-old-fashioned public relations to build a strong reputation among minorities. For example, companies can create positive buzz by tapping key media sources, such as ethnically oriented magazines and newspapers, to make it known when a minority professional has been hired or promoted to a strategic position.


    However, Pemberton warns companies against spending too much time vying for recognition. Cultivating the image of diversity without actually changing the nuts and bolts of workforce strategy could lead to problems down the road, he says.


    “A lot of the problems with retaining minority employees start at the recruiting stage,” he says.


Holding on to talent
    As challenging as finding qualified minority talent can be, retention is an even more daunting task. Turnover rates often hamper building a critical mass of minorities within an organization. Attrition among minorities has not been formally quantified, but anecdotal evidence from workforce specialists indicates that it is a chronic problem.


    This troubling trend can be mitigated through education, explains Thomas Kochan, professor of management at MIT’s Sloan School of Management. But the level of instruction that is required should go well beyond simply promoting acceptance of other cultures and ethnicities.


    “Adults don’t change attitudes,” Kochan says, “but they can learn to be more effective workers with the right skills sets.”


    Employees should be instructed on issues like communicating effectively and conflict management—all tools that provide pragmatic skills for enhancing the dynamic of a group. The emphasis of the training should be helping workers to draw out the talent and creativity in one another, Kochan says.


    Tools like mentoring programs not only lead to better group dynamics by blending people of different backgrounds and levels of experience, but they also aid in the development of minorities. Mentors can offer special tips on navigating successfully within an organization.


    “If minorities see ethnic figures in positions of power, it gives them something to aspire to,” says Irma Davidson, director of talent acquisition at Homestore, an online retailer in Westlake Village, California.


    Centralizing mentoring programs is always a good idea because it makes them more formal, says Elizabeth Holmes, senior vice president and chief learning officer for Roosevelt Thomas Consulting & Training, a diversity workforce specialist in Decatur, Georgia. Mentor programs are also important because they give minorities a platform from which to showcase their skills and voice ideas—which could be instrumental when seeking a promotion. This is one area where most experts agree that employers can drastically improve.


    Lack of career advancement is one of the biggest sources of frustration for minorities, and often a major contributor to high turnover rates, Holmes says. Compared with white males, for instance, it takes minorities longer to be promoted. Formal feedback is a good way to let employees know where they stand and what they need to do to get to the next level of their careers.


    The flow of information should be a two-way street, however, with companies learning valuable lessons from their employees, as well. If handled properly, affinity groups can help employers keep a finger on the pulse of minority groups within an organization. The key to having a successful affinity group is to give them structure and provide guidance, otherwise they run the risk of becoming just another social gathering, Holmes says. In addition to leveraging affinity groups for gauging how minorities think and feel, they are a good way for employees of similar backgrounds to come in contact with one another.


    “They can learn the ropes together and lean on each other,” Holmes says.


    Training and education initiatives should be accompanied by deeper workforce management policies, experts advise. One way to improve the quality of employee development within an organization is to hold employees in influential positions accountable for how they manage talent.


    “The human capital decisions that managers make can have a direct impact on attrition,” Holmes says.


    Equally important is realizing that conflict is bound to emerge within any truly diverse organization. When friction arises, managers should be trained to meet the challenge head on, because denying that it exists will not make the problem disappear.


    “Getting along is nice, but it is not the end goal for employers,” Holmes explains. “Being productive and getting the job done is what’s important.”

Posted on May 9, 2006July 10, 2018

Data Accuracy, Privacy Key at IHRIM Gathering

The critical role that the privacy, integrity and protection of employee data plays in organizations was the focus of several sessions at the International Association for Human Resource Information Management conference in Washington, D.C., last month.


At a time when HR software vendors tout “strategic applications” such as performance management and workforce analytics, many companies are wrestling with a much more basic challenge: making sure their information is consistent and their figures add up.


The Progressive Group of Insurance Companies is a case in point. Progressive, a major auto insurance provider, struggled mightily before it made its employee data uniform, said Laurie Munoz, HR systems manager at the company. Munoz told a conference session that Progressive made a big investment in PeopleSoft software in the late 1990s, but the resulting system failed to generate accurate reports. “We got these numbers that were ludicrous, like 475 percent turnover in some areas when we reorganized,” Munoz said.


Among the obstacles to arriving at clean data, Munoz said, was a lack of common definitions for such seemingly straightforward terms as turnover percentage and headcount.


Similar issues can plague attempts to create worldwide HR systems, according to participants at another conference session. For example, choosing whether to use the term “family name,” “given name” or “last name” in setting up data fields can be tricky. And resolving such matters involves talks with a variety of constituents within an organization, said session facilitator Rob Eidson of Deloitte Consulting. “This is not for the faint of heart,” Eidson said. “It’s hard, challenging stuff.”


Even such basic data as the number of employees can’t be taken for granted.


“What’s (our) headcount? That’s what we’re struggling with,” said Kathleen Murray of Fidelity Investments.


As they work to get a grip on such basic measures, organizations also face laws restricting the way they handle employee data in their HR information technology systems. In a session titled “Can Data Privacy and HRIT Coexist?” officials from Eli Lilly and Co. outlined challenges of dealing with privacy laws and regulations that differ from state to state and nation to nation. “HR privacy is the sleeping giant of privacy issues,” said Carolyn Anker, who works in Eli Lilly’s global privacy office.


Consultant Donald Harris went further in another session. Harris, president of HR Privacy Solutions, said many businesses fail to abide by a law restricting transfers of employee data outside of the European Union. “I’m sure that many companies are (violating the law),” Harris said.


Harris led a session focused on “binding corporate rules,” which are corporate codes of conduct for data protection that can serve as a way to observe EU law.


If organizations can keep their noses clean regarding privacy laws and keep their data tidy, technology today promises to help companies set better strategies. Munoz said that an HR scorecard at Progressive allowed the company to realize it should focus on employee referrals as a good source of new employees and to slow down its growth in a specific market because of high turnover among claims adjusters.


A key, she said, was having the HR department lead the way in coming to common understandings. “We needed to take control,” she said.


—Ed Frauenheim

Posted on May 9, 2006July 10, 2018

WorldatWork Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition 2006

WorldatWork Total Rewards Conference & Exhibition 2006
May 7-10, 2006, at the Anaheim Convention Center in Anaheim, California

What: Founded in 1955, WorldatWork touts itself as is the world’s leading not-for-profit professional association dedicated to knowledge leadership in total rewards, compensation, benefits and work/life balance. WorldatWork focuses on human resources disciplines associated with attracting, motivating and retaining employees. The 2006 conference in Anaheim attracted more than 2,000 attendees from some 35 different countries, and 160 companies showcasing products and services in the exhibit hall.

Conference Info: For more information about WorldatWork, go to www.worldatwork.org.


Date: Tuesday, May 9, 2006

Is CEO compensation a zero-sum game? The solutions that companies concoct to cope with challenges of the moment often have unintended consequences, according to David Swinford, senior managing director at Pearl Meyer & Partners in New York. For instance, take stock options, which were created to give CEOs ownership incentives for meeting performance objectives. Or look at the golden parachutes of the 1980s that were devised to fend off hostile takeovers. The most recent example of this phenomenon is the practice of backdating stock options, which was acceptable in the 1990s but has now engulfed UnitedHealth Group CEO William McGuire in a storm of controversy.

Does Swinford believe that the CEO compensation system is fundamentally broken? No. But he does think that companies should be cognizant that compensation structures that made sense in the past are not necessarily sensible for today’s business environment.

Swinford also stressed the need for companies to develop a compensation philosophy and to stick to their principles when hiring a new CEO. “Be prepared to walk away from a candidate if necessary,” he said.

A compensation specialist sitting in the audience swiftly challenged Swinford’s views. “I do not like what I am hearing,” a woman said. “The situation is not as negative as you are portraying it to be.” Swinford playfully responded: “If I ever give a speech that doesn’t stir controversy, please shoot me.”

Digging beneath the surface: The session on developing remuneration frameworks for China—led by Elliot Santner, compensation specialist from Grainger, and Chikage Nose of Mercer Human Resource Consulting—got off to a rocky start. There were technical difficulties with the microphones and the speaker system, which inadvertently streamed in loud noises from concurrent sessions. Within the first five minutes of the presentation, the sound specialist made no less than three separate trips up to the stage. “This wouldn’t happen in China,” an audience member said. “I wouldn’t know,” Nose replied, “I’m from Japan.”

The crowd laughed, and, it’s hoped, drew an important lesson from this incident: Asia should not be taken at face value. There are far too many nuances in the cultures, languages and business environments to take a simplistic approach. Take the variances in compensation structures within China alone. There are three different tiers that companies can use as a roadmap when creating remuneration packages.

Companies in first-tier cities like Shanghai, Beijing and Shenzhen can expect to pay out the highest salaries. Meanwhile, remuneration in second-tier locations like Nanjing, Wuxi and Suzhou can be 13 percent to 22 percent less. But if companies are really looking for a bargain, they should look for workers in cities like Zhongshan, Zhenjiang and Huizhou, where compensation can be as much as 30 percent lower than in first-tier locales. However, cheap doesn’t always translate to smooth operation, Nose and Santner point out. The less developed the city, the more difficult it may be to find qualified talent.

–Gina Ruiz



Day 2: Monday, May 8, 2006

Morning keynote: What would a conference be without a best-selling business author to give the keynote? For this conference, the speaker was Jason Jennings, author of Less Is More and It’s Not the Big That Eat the Small–It’s the Fast That Eat the Slow. There’s a reason why authors like Jennings, Malcolm Gladwell, Marcus Buckingham and others make such a good living speaking to HR and management conferences. It’s because everyone is hungry for leadership and management wisdom and hope that one of these guys has the silver bullet.
Jennings is good and has a good message, but no, he doesn’t have a silver bullet. What he has is this piece of advice: “Finding, keeping and growing the right people is the single biggest business challenge today.” He talked about his book research, which looks at 180,000 companies around the world–research that he says has identified the fastest, most productive and best-performing companies anywhere. Jennings named a few: Cabela’s, the world’s largest catalog merchant selling fishing, hunting and outdoor gear; World Savings; Nucor Steel; and Ikea. Jennings said a company’s culture “is the ultimate competitive advantage.”

I don’t want to work, I just want to bang on the drum all day: WorkatWork had an interesting way to get people awake and functioning for an extra-early 8 a.m. keynote Monday. A three-person troupe of taiko drummers banging away like the cast of Stomp. There were easily 20 minutes or more of headache-inducing drum pounding before the speakers mercifully came on. This is the ultimate way to get a crowd to appreciate the keynote and other presentations: Pound their brain cells into submission beforehand.

You can’t win over the comp committee without a scorecard: It took SunTrust Banks just under a year to overhaul its total rewards program in order to remain a competitive employer. SunTrust’s program is complex—there are 180 incentive plans covering the bank’s 35,000 employees, said Jo Anne Moeller, senior vice president of compensation and HRIS for the organization. Moeller described SunTrust’s case study during a Monday afternoon session and described one technique to engage and guide decision-makers in such a detailed and deep endeavor: Come up with the mother of all charts. So that senior management and the compensation committee could see where the bank stood in its current rewards plan, what should change and what the results of that change would mean to its competitive position in the bank-pay marketplace, Moeller and her team developed an at-a-glance chart that she described as “detailed but fairly concise.” Indeed. The chart is eight levels deep and 14 categories across. Moeller said the team that developed the plan had outside consultants, of course, but also involved representatives from SunTrust’s benefits, compensation and controller’s departments. “In my experience, when you have the accounting folks say, ‘Yes, those are my numbers,’ it makes the CEO feel better,” Moeller said.

Duel in the sun: Sometimes the best way to see all of the shades of gray of a subject is to examine it in stark black and white. That’s exactly what compensation consultants Jannice Koors of Pearl Meyer and Partners and Erin Bass-Goldberg of Frederic W. Cook & Co. did for the increasingly controversial subject of executive compensation during their workshop session “Dueling Consultants: Perspectives on Executive Compensation.” The “dueling” duo addressed both sides of the “800-pound gorillas.” Those are the thorniest executive compensation questions, such as impact of proposed SEC proxy rules on executives pay, whether CEO pay is too high and the effectiveness of various long-term incentives.
Their polarized examination helped highlight the fact that executive compensation is an emotional and complex issue, and is not governed by a fixed set of rules. Koors and Bass-Goldberg concluded that public companies are taking the issue of CEO compensation more seriously and, faced with new disclosure rules, are “self-regulating.”

–Robert Scally, John Hollon and Carroll Lachnit

 

Posted on May 8, 2006June 29, 2023

C-Suite January 2006

People moving into key executive positions



Jack Fingerhut has been named president of SmartPros in Hawthorne, New York.

Robert L. Contois has been named vice president of human resources at Wayport Inc. in Austin, Texas.

Genia Spencer has been appointed head of human resources at Randstad USA.

Daryl Smith has been named senior vice president of human resources at ESPN. Smith replaces Kerry Chandler, who has become senior vice president of human resources at Hong Kong Disneyland.

Joseph A. LoCicero has been named president and CEO of Segal Group in New York.
 
Patrick Manion has been appointed vice president and chief HR officer at Hard Rock International.

Submit your move


Posted on May 8, 2006June 29, 2023

C-Suite March 2006

People moving into key executive positions



John G. Peeler has joined the Castleton Group as the firm’s business development manager.

Steven Tighe has been named managing principal at Strategic Talent Partners in Minneapolis.

Ben Jensen has been named director of transportation recruitment and retention for Bernard Hodes Group in Phoenix.

Robert Middleton has been appointed chief executive of Aon Consulting in the U.K.

Jeffrey Wahba has been named CFO of HireRight Inc. in Irvine, California.

Russ Moen has been promoted to vice president of human resources at Express Personnel Services in Oklahoma City.

Barbara Kurka has been promoted to senior vice president and director of human resources for Katz Media.

Greg Pawelskihas been promoted to director of human resources for Con-Way Central Express.

Steven A. Levin has been added as a director to Chartis Group’s leadership team in New York.

Carl Hess has been appointed director of investment consulting for North America at Watson Wyatt.

Joseph P. Delaney has been named president and CEO and Patrick Dills has been named chairman of the board at Medical Services Co.

Janet Perna has been appointed to the board of directors at Cognos.

Roger Gaston has been named executive vice president for Kenexa’s employment process outsourcing practice in Wayne, Pennsylvania.

Carol Sipe has been named senior vice president and general manager of Summit Operations.

Sheren Ghali has been appointed vice president of human resources at WageWorks.

Brian Fawkes has joined Achievo Corp. as vice president of corporate communications.

Submit your move


Posted on May 8, 2006June 29, 2023

C-Suite February 2006

People moving into key executive positions



Karl Grass has been appointed vice president and general manager for Sage Abra HRMS and Sage Payroll Services at Sage Software in St. Petersburg, Florida.

Ronald Bottano has been appointed senior client partner at Korn/Ferry International in Los Angeles.

Sherry Luper has joined Silkroad Technology as senior vice president of human resources in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Gary Fisher has been appointed HR director at Gate Gourmet based in Zurich, Switzerland, and Reston, Virginia.

Andrew Young has been named chairman of Working Families for Wal-Mart Steering Committee.

Christy Suerth has been appointed director of human resources at Proactive Worldwide.

Bill Ziegler has been appointed talent acquisition leader in the human resources department at Deloitte Services in New York.

Gregory Troyhas been named vice president and chief human resources officer at Modine Manufacturing Co. in Racine, Wisconsin.

Jane Loftus has joined GeoLogistics as senior vice president of human resources in Santa Ana, California.

Rod Fralicx has rejoined Hay Group as general manager in Chicago.

Charles Harvey has been named vice president of diversity and public affairs for Johnson Controls in Milwaukee, while Brian Cooke has been appointed vice president of manufacturing and technology.

Yvonne Wolf has been appointed vice president and chief people officer at Denny’s Inc. in Spartanburg, South Carolina.

Art Brown has been named regional manager for CPS Human Resource Services’ Northeast region, based in New York.

Submit your move


Posted on May 8, 2006June 29, 2023

C-Suite April 2006


People moving into key executive positions




Kathryn Hayley has been appointed CEO of Aon Consulting’s U.S. operations.

Mary Britt Tetro has been named vice president of global staffing for Armstrong Holdings Inc.

Kevin Loo has joined CyberShift as vice president of technology and product development.

Ted Blumenberg has joined Harvey Nash USA as CFO for its U.S. operations.

Nick Sharma has been appointed senior vice president for Satyam Computer Services Ltd.’s global infrastructure management in Boston.

Bill Nicholson, Peter Weinberg and James Ferrari have joined Buck Consultants. Nicholson joins as principal in the communication practice in the Atlanta office; Weinberg has been named a principal in the HR management consulting practice in Chicago; and Ferrari will be in the St. Louis office as principal and local retirement practice leader.

Patricia R. Willard has joined Heidrick & Struggles as chief human resources officer in Chicago.

Anna Miranda has been appointed human resource manager at Pro Source Inc. in Irvine, California.

Submit your move


Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress