Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on June 3, 2005July 10, 2018

PDS Catches Attention With Low-key Approach

Industry-leading HRMS companies use aggressive sales and marketing campaigns and big trade shows attended by hundreds of clients to help sell their software. Then there is PDS, a full-service HRMS company based in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania.



    PDS, which generates $5 million to $10 million in revenue serving midmarket companies, gets a lot of business by word-of-mouth. The 31-year-old company offers a full suite of HRMS products, such as payroll, tax management, recruitment and staffing, regulatory compliance and employee and manager self-service software. Still, when it comes to marketing, it bears little resemblance to larger vendors like SAP, Oracle and Lawson Software.


    “Most of our marketing has been designed to work in reverse,” says vice president of sales George Brady. “People seek us out.”


    For PDS, the combination of good technology, low cost and service is working.


    “We like to say we bring our projects in on time and under budget,” Brady says. “We have always been the smallest vendor in our market space, but I can name a lot of companies much bigger than us who are no longer in business.”


    One of the clients who sought PDS out is Anne Vekaryasz, the corporate payroll supervisor for Tendercare, Michigan’s largest chain of long-term care facilities. Tendercare was paying a substantial amount to a large Web-based HRMS payroll specialist but was still plagued by time cards, spreadsheet problems and communicating with the company’s 4,200 employees stretched out over 37 facilities.


    “We found we needed more control,” Vekaryasz says. “We wanted to become completely self-sufficient.”


    Getting software salespeople to trek up to her base in Rogers City, a small town in northeast Michigan, proved difficult. One leading HRMS vendor didn’t even return her call, Vekaryasz says. But PDS did, and a contract was signed.


    “We found they were the best fit for us for the right money,” she says.


    A much bigger client is Teleflex, an international engineering products company that has dozens of subsidiaries, 19,000 employees and $2 billion in annual revenue and is growing by leaps and bounds.


    Now near the end of a five-year implementation project with PDS, Teleflex needed a single system to tie together the 100-plus companies that it has acquired. The companies were being served by a variety of payroll and HRMS vendors.


    Cory Wetterau, the Teleflex human resources information system project manager working with PDS, says his company has saved nearly $500,000 so far by consolidating various systems. One of the big benefits is that Teleflex licensed and bought the PDS Vista system. That allows the company to save on things like float, the value of interest on tax withholding and payroll money banked by the firms that previously provided payroll on a contract basis.


    It also helps that Teleflex is located in Limerick, Pennsylvania–close enough to Blue Bell to get hands-on service.


    “PDS is a small local firm we can lean on and get a lot of support from,” Wetterau says.


    Offering ownership of their HRMS system is part of the value proposition Brady says his company can provide.


    “When people rent, they move on to what they perceive is the next latest greatest thing,” Brady says. “If they buy it, they will stay with you. We’ve had customers who have been with us for eight, 10, 20 years.”


Workforce Management, June 2005, p. 62 —Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 3, 2005July 10, 2018

Filling a Gap

Payroll, open enrollment and benefits administration can be a nightmare for a company like Dallas-based Atrium Cos., a window and door manufacturer. Over the past eight years, Atrium has gone from 900 employees to 6,700, creating enough payroll and workforce management issues to outgrow two software systems.



    Nancy Hartmann, corporate human resources director for Atrium, says she thinks the third system, from Employease Inc., will have more staying power. After shopping around, she signed up Employease in 2003 and just renewed for another two years. But she is keeping her options open.


    “You never know where you will be tomorrow,” she says.


    Small and midsize employers like Atrium, while they have the same administrative requirements as much larger companies, often don’t have the budget for a full enterprise-wide HRMS application or the desire to dramatically boost their IT and human resources departments to handle the extra work.


    Enter Employease, one of a number of growing software service providers that fill the gap between blue-chip HRMS applications with all the bells and whistles and outdated legacy systems that date back to the dawn of software.


    Employease, which has won awards for its Web technology, has 1,000 small to midsize clients. It markets its technology, which offers nearly all the traditional HRMS services with the exception of payroll, for its ease of use.


    “People don’t want scary, very hard to do, something you approach with trepidation,” says Jeff Beinke, Employease’s vice president of product strategy. “Every application must be easy to use, easy to implement and easy to learn. If a feature doesn’t conform to that, we send it back to the drawing board.”


    Employease offers a variety of services, such as benefits administration, self-service for both managers and employees and performance management. Clients are allowed to pick and choose the services they want rather than having to sign up for a complete suite.


    What makes it go are more than 3,000 connections with medical, dental, life insurance and 401(k) providers outside the company, as well as agreements with enterprise-level software providers like PeopleSoft, Lawson Software and SAP, Beinke says. As for not providing payroll, Beinke says Employease finds it easier to outsource to one of the major players, like Ceridian, ADP or Millenium.


    Employease can implement its system in four to eight weeks, in contrast to months and sometimes years for larger systems. Charges range from $4 to $8 per employee per month.


    Atrium outsources its payroll to ADP. It uses Employease for benefit communications, open enrollment and as the connection between the company and its leading health care provider, Cigna.


    Employease does the health insurance billing and reconciliation of monthly premiums. If employees have a problem, they call Employease directly, rather than someone at Atrium.


    “The whole process saves us a lot of time and fixes a lot of mistakes,” Hartmann says. She doesn’t like to think what it would take to do it in-house. “You get past the additional people, and then there are issues like adding cubicles and filing systems and computers. The list of things is never ending.”


Workforce Management, June 2005, pp. 60-62 —Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 2, 2005July 10, 2018

Turnover at the Best Companies to Work For

TURNOVER AT THE “BEST COMPANIES TO WORK FOR”
Fortune includes voluntary turnover rates as a metric in its annual “Best Companies to Work For” list, but rates vary widely, even among companies in the same industry. Among grocery retailers, for example, voluntary turnover at Wegmans is just 6 percent, compared with 32 percent at Whole Foods.

Voluntary turnover rates at top 20 companies on Fortune’s 2005
“Best Companies to Work For” list for large companies:


1. Wegmans Food Markets 6%
2. Starbucks 12
3. Valero Energy 29
4. Cisco Systems  3
5. Whole Foods Market 32
6. Baptist Health S. Florida  7
7. Amgen  5
8. Goldman Sachs 11
9. American Express 14
10. Synovus Financial 14
11. Four Seasons Hotels 16
12. Station Casinos 14
13. A.G. Edwards  9
14. Microsoft  5
15. General Mills  4
16. Principal Financial Group  8
17. Marriott International 18
18. Procter & Gamble  7
19. First Horizon National 16
20. Medtronic  6
Source: Fortune, January 24, 2005

Workforce Management, June 2005, p. 40 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 2, 2005July 10, 2018

Fostering a Loyal Workforce at Trader Joe’s

Trader Joe’s has become a multi-billion dollar national chain partly through its ability to find cheap real estate, skip name brands and smartly manage its supply chain.

It’s also due to its workforce management practices. Below, excerpts from a new book Trader Joe’s Adventure, review the company’s management compensation, encouragement of multitasking,screening and wages, careful use of money,fun culture, sense that its people are its brand, and communication style.

“Hi. How are you today?” asks a smiling, Hawaiian shirted stock clerk as I enter the store.

“Fine. Just looking around,” I reply.

“Great. Let me know if you need anything. We’ve got some great products in,” he says, bouncing down the aisle and straightening out the shelves as he goes along.

At the back of the store, a perky, raven-haired woman behind a kiosk that looks like a B-movie version of a beachfront bar in the tropics is sampling a vegetable medley.

“You’ve got to try this one. I sautéed it with some chicken and the kids loved it,” she tells a young mother with a four-year-old squirming in the back of the cart.

“You can really use anything with it. If she doesn’t like it, bring it back,” she adds spooning samples into little plastic cups for other customers who are starting to appear.

Twenty minutes and three more “Can I help yous?” later, I reach the register, where a teenage girl is bagging groceries for an elderly woman and her husband. “Are you going to be all right, or can I get you some help with the cart?” she asks, as the woman shakily maneuvers toward the exit.

She then turns to me. “Hi. How are you today? Did you find everything you need?”

I assure her that I did. “Aren’t these great?” she asks, scanning my bag of peanut butter–filled pretzels. As she hands me change from my $20 bill, she actually looks me in the eye and says sincerely, “Have a nice day!”

Exchanges like these are more the rule than the exception at Trader Joe’s, where store employees go out of their way to engage customers in conversation and, in a nice way, tout some of the store’s new items. In many respects, this kind of attention is the polar opposite of what consumers have come to expect from conventional supermarkets, where turnover is high, customer service is virtually nonexistent, and employees often spend more time complaining about their jobs than doing them.

Much has been said about the quality and value of Trader Joe’s unique array of products, the fun shopping environment with the retro feel of a mom-and-pop store, the company’s strong relationships with suppliers, and the creativity and tenacity with which it searches out items from around the world for one of the industry’s most distinctive and successful private label programs. Without question, all of these things are an essential part of what makes Trader Joe’s such a thriving retailer when much larger chains are struggling to survive.

But there’s a saying in retail circles that the last 100 feet are the hardest. Every effort can be made to heighten the efficiency of the supply chain and get products from the manufacturer to the retailer’s back door in the most cost-effective way possible. Yet, if in-store execution is shoddy, retailers simply end up shooting themselves in the foot.

A big part of this execution–or the last 100 feet–at Trader Joe’s is its employees, people who like what they do, go out of their way to help customers, and even engage in some suggestive selling. They are a major reason for the company’s success. After all, few employers–particularly in retailing–can boast of having such high levels of employee loyalty, not to mention extremely low turnover.

Compensate workers well

The core of this allegiance is a wage and benefits package that is typically far more competitive than that of most companies in the supermarket industry. Wages may attract high-quality employees, but wages are not necessarily the reason they remain loyal, as any human resources expert can attest. Employees stay because Trader Joe’s has created a culture of success: an environment in which everyone does the same job at one time or another and a place where people’s opinions are respected and talents are nurtured.

On first blush, this sounds a bit like the West Coast communes of the 1960s, where sharing everything from work to food drew a generation of young idealists. But at Trader Joe’s, it’s just good business. Indeed, the retailer, which also prides itself on the opportunities it offers everyone, from young workers putting in just a few hours a month to help pay for college to store managers, has been cited as one of the best places to work by Fortune magazine, joining the ranks of such estimable employers as Harley-Davidson, FedEx, Ford Motor Company, and Southwest Airlines.

In a world rocked by layoffs, cutbacks, corporate scandals, and labor unrest–particularly in retailing–Trader Joe’s has long adhered to the philosophy that happy employees make for happy customers. Happy customers spend more and visit the store more frequently. This attitude is rare in the retail industry at large, where employees are often seen as expendable.

Because of this philosophy, Trader Joe’s is one of a handful of companies responsible for what is seen as a paradigm shift in the retail industry, according to human resources expert Mel Kleiman of Humetrics, an internationally recognized authority on recruiting, selecting, and retaining hourly workers. “They’ve taken the approach that the employee is number one,” Kleiman observes. “They feel that if they treat employees the way they want employees to treat customers, odds are stores will have a better shot at providing a unique shopping experience for people as soon as they walk through the door.”

This objective makes Trader Joe’s a tough place to land a job, which is also true of companies like Southwest Airlines, Whole Foods Market, and The Container Store, all of which only hire applicants who fit their strict customer service–oriented mold. But Trader Joe’s takes it a step beyond the basic recruitment process. The company firmly believes that formal training and the product knowledge that people gain on the job results in work that’s more interesting than what you’ll find at your usual supermarket. Interesting work keeps employee retention levels high. It’s difficult for someone to give up the fostering environment at Trader Joe’s to go somewhere else.

In some ways, the employee philosophy at Trader Joe’s is similar to the one espoused by Aldi, its German parent company. In an effort to control labor costs, which are among the biggest expenses on any retailer’s profit and loss statement, Aldi and Trader Joe’s take a somewhat bare-bones approach to the amount of labor needed in stores at any given time. However, they don’t scrimp on pay.

For its management-training program, Aldi makes extensive use of executive recruiters and woos applicants with a generous financial package that includes a starting salary of about $47,000 annually plus pension benefits. To get the most motivated people into its 12-month training program, the company offers new hires a fully expensed company car– an Audi A4. This is an attractive perk for recent college graduates, one of the key targets of the chain’s recruiting efforts.

Aldi is not one to be frivolous when it comes to labor costs at any level in the company. Luxuries and status symbols are rare, and even top executives may be required to fly coach. The cars are not available to all employees, just some of those in the management training program who are being groomed to become district managers with responsibility for six to eight stores.

Because they will get a car anyway, Aldi provides them with one from the start of their training and also allows unlimited use of the vehicle for private purposes. The chain knows that, for young people starting out, the cost of having a car is sky-high, and having this expense off their backs is just as good as getting more money in their paychecks. It also fosters incredible loyalty among people who might otherwise bounce from job to job seeking a better deal.

Encourage multitasking

The big difference between labor practices at Aldi and Trader Joe’s seems to be operational. Both firms expect the best from their people, but Trader Joe’s is a bit more informal, counting on and encouraging employees to multitask without regard to job descriptions. As such, it’s not unusual for store managers to sweep the floors, stock shelves, and work the registers when the need arises.

This is all part of a collaborative working environment that is valued by employees and transparent to customers. Although a collaborative or informal working environment can look somewhat haphazard to outsiders, it is an extension of Trader Joe’s accelerated employee training. As the company itself has said, “The key to our continuing growth and success is our crew. We cannot grow without providing our crew with an environment that allows them the freedom to be themselves so they have the ability to be their best.”

The first step in developing the right employee environment at Trader Joe’s is the Leadership Development Program. This is made up of separate modules that isolate tasks and experiences needed to oversee stores and the personnel in them. The program is designed to allow people to make their own decisions about store operations, including product mix and in-store displays. This training is particularly important because employee autonomy is so highly valued.

Trader Joe’s University focuses on management, leadership, and communications skills. Trainers conduct off-site university classes, each with an average of 15 to 25 students, at every stage of an employee’s professional development. But store managers and assistant managers–“captains” and “first mates” in Trader Joe’s parlance–are encouraged to mentor and coach “novitiates” (supervisors in training) as well as other full-time and part time associates, referred to as the “crew.”

This mentoring is essential, because managers and assistant managers for the company’s growing roster of stores are promoted from within, also an Aldi trait. In fact, most of them started as part-timers, an indication that the training program, combined with other adjunct efforts to take care of the workforce, is effective at attracting and retaining good people.

Screen well and set clear rules

Aldi, whose store managers would never think of addressing another store employee as “dude,” seems a bit more intense about screening potential candidates and offering prospective employees more clearly defined roles. This philosophy, according to the chain’s United Kingdom Web site, creates a “positive, frictionless working environment.” Job descriptions at Aldi are short and precise and are followed faithfully by individual employees. These descriptions are also part of a sophisticated control system in the form of spot checks.

For those who do enter Aldi’s 12-month intensive training program, the addition of the car and other benefits brings the total compensation package up to £51,500 or approximately $62,300.

Sometimes creating clearly defined roles and expectations can give rise to very strict labor policies that apply to both store employees and executives.

One example is rather extreme but is a good indication of what Aldi demands. The chain has a strict no-alcohol policy for employees at work. When a former country manager of Denmark was caught drinking champagne at a store reception, he was fired instantly. “It was an innocent, business related reception where champagne was being offered to other people,” says Oliver Heins, an analyst for Planet Retail in London. “It didn’t seem to make any difference that he was the one who turned that operation from being unprofitable to profitable within two years.”

For both Aldi and Trader Joe’s, creating this largely harmonious environment means keeping unions out. This is not too difficult given the generous wage and benefits packages. But in one landmark case, Trader Joe’s won an injunction in 1998 against an organization called Progressive Campaigns in California. The organization began soliciting signatures outside a store in Santa Rosa, California, and harassing customers by blocking free access to the stores, according to Trader Joe’s attorneys. The injunction established once and for all that California residents didn’t have the right to free speech or assembly at a privately owned, freestanding store.

In addition to wages, Trader Joe’s also offers respectable job opportunities in an industry that has, with few exceptions, rarely been considered a hot or even a viable career path. Certainly, one reason is that about 65 percent of the overall supermarket industry’s workforce is made up of part-time employees. The workforce is heavily skewed to teenagers, for whom stocking shelves, slicing cold cuts, or ringing a register is hardly glamorous nor the stuff from which career paths are made.

However, if money is the prime motivator, Trader Joe’s may jump-start more than its share of careers in the food industry and will most likely never be a union shop. The company pays employees an average of $21 per hour, compared with an average of $17.90 at union operations. Add to that health insurance and retirement benefits, and you’ve got all the ingredients of world-class labor practices that don’t go unappreciated by employees or unnoticed by customers. Consider last year’s four-month strike by grocery clerks in Southern California. When picket lines went up around stores operated by Kroger, Albertsons, and Safeway, customers flocked to Trader Joe’s, and sales soared an estimated 30 percent.

Even first-year novitiates or managers in training, can have a very lucrative financial package. According to the latest available figures from the company, the total compensation for first year personnel at this level comes to $47,429. This includes an average salary of about $40,150, plus an average bonus of $950.

As a sweetener, the company contributes about $6,329 to the employee’s retirement fund at this salary level. Other features of the compensation package at Trader Joe’s include medical, dental, and vision insurance; life and accident insurance; and paid time off. Additionally, the company conducts quarterly performance reviews, usually an annual affair at most chains. But what really sets the chain apart is the company-paid retirement plan under which the company contributes 15.4 percent of an employee’s annual gross income to a tax-free income retirement account.

Looking at other wage rates, a first mate–an assistant store manager–pulls down an average salary of $67,930, an average bonus of $14,000, and a retirement contribution of $12,617, bringing the total compensation package to $94,547.

The captain or store manager–a position that, as noted, entails everything from management duties to sweeping up– has an average base salary of $79,455. But average bonuses based on performance come to $35,000, and a retirement contribution of more than $17,000 at that level brings the entire compensation package to more than $132,0002–among the highest in the entire supermarket industry.

Small wonder that when a Trader Joe’s store opened in Los Altos, California, in the fall of 2003, the company received more than 500 applications for just 50 available jobs.

A liberal wage and benefits package may be the optimal way to recruit people, but it doesn’t necessarily get them to stay, notes Blake Frank of the University of Dallas’s Graduate School of Management. “Trader Joe’s is not typical of most retail establishments,” Frank says. “A liberal benefits package does give them a competitive edge from a recruiting perspective. People looking for a new job look for money. But pay is not why employees generally remain with an organization.”

Run a tight ship

Despite these liberal benefits, Trader Joe’s is not about to throw around money carelessly. To control labor costs, overall store payrolls are kept down by having a lower head count in each location per dollar of sales. There are exceptions, however, according to Alex Lintner of The Boston Consulting Group. Lintner explains that at a cash-rich time like Saturday afternoon, when the store is wall-to-wall customers, as many as 18 people may be working in the back room and in the front of the store, compared to a maximum of 10 people at other times. Some industry insiders would argue that labor rates at Trader Joe’s are excessive given the state of the industry and the size of its stores.

This forward-thinking chain is buying more than just warm bodies. It pays more because its standards are higher than those of the average grocery store. Rather than seeking the disengaged worker who is simply looking to make an extra buck, so prevalent in retailing these days, Trader Joe’s focuses on finding highly motivated people with a talent for customer service. A willingness to relocate is also an advantage, because the company is continually expanding into new markets and still prefers to promote from within.

Most important to the company are employees who share its values, have a passion for food, and can provide a level of customer service that makes every shopping experience fun.

Perhaps the best description of what the company looks for in its captain, novitiates, specialists, and crew comes from the company itself. “Our captains are customer satisfaction experts, ambassadors, food tasters, personnel specialists, merchandisers, problem solvers, and community volunteers, and they know their way around a luau. Upbeat, outgoing personalities blossom in this flexible environment, and a good sense of humor never hurts.”

Make it fun

As one recent article on the company noted, the qualifications for employees at Trader Joe’s might be more often associated with the gentil organisateurs, or GOs, at Club Med than a grocery clerk. (In French, gentil organisateur translates to “congenial organizer” or “gracious/friendly host”–like social directors in charge of making sure that people staying at the facility are taken care of and have a good time.) Supermarket industry observers underscore this point time and again. “I think it’s probably fun to work there because they don’t take themselves too seriously,” says Dan Raftery, a Chicago-based retail consultant and regular Trader Joe’s shopper. “It’s a very positive environment, not oppressive, stale, or negative.”

Contrary to employee attitudes you run across in many conventional supermarkets, everyone at Trader Joe’s, from the captain on down, truly appears to enjoy what they do. “They don’t seem to feel bad about being there,” notes one retail consultant, adding that he’s observed the same attitude at Trader Joe’s stores across the country and doubts it’s a coincidence.

“You get paid well, go to work in a Hawaiian shirt, eat good food, and talk to people. This is all part of that unique culture that the chain has cultivated,” says Sandy Skrovan, vice president of Retail Forward, a retail consultant based in Columbus, Ohio.

It’s also part of what Neil Stern, vice president of McMillan/ Doolittle in Chicago, calls the Trader Joe’s gestalt. “It’s not only about product but also an attitude and lifestyle that extends to people in the store,” Stern says. “This makes them [Trader Joe’s workers] markedly different from employees in traditional supermarkets. It’s like being part of a club. Personally, the fact I shop there means I’m educated and won’t get sucked in by big brands and paying a lot of money for packaging. So I describe myself in very complimentary ways when I tell you I’m a Trader Joe’s customer. It’s the same thing for people who work there. It’s complimentary. It’s a cool place to work–fun, informal–and they sell great stuff. Frankly, the labor turmoil in the rest of the industry has worked to the advantage of Trader Joe’s.”

Stern is alluding to a four-month retail clerks’ strike in Southern California in 2004, which boosted business for Trader Joe’s, along with the cloud that continues to hang over labor negotiations in other parts of the country.

“Look at places like Whole Foods, Stew Leonard’s, and Wegmans,” Stern continues. “It’s no coincidence that great stores to shop at are also great places to work–and all of them nonunion. You can create a great marketing campaign, a billion-dollar ad campaign with glitzy flyers, but you can’t fake store morale. You want to know about Kmart? Walk into a store and talk to employees. Trader Joe’s is just the opposite.”

Your people are your brand

Clearly, the chain sees its own people as a way to build brand recognition for the store. The attitude within the corporate office is that the people it hires, trains, and promotes are just as important as the low prices and products it carries.

As such, Trader Joe’s is known for treating employees with a measure of respect and dignity that is virtually unequaled in the supermarket industry. Everyone from vice presidents to clerks are encouraged to come up with new ideas, all of which are taken very seriously and often acted upon. “In an environment where the hierarchy is leveled and you’re appreciated for your contributions –how could you fail?” asks consultant Gretchen Gogesch, who notes that employees personally test a lot of the new products that eventually make it to the shelves. “It creates rabid employee loyalty and, in turn, genuine caring for customers.”

While Trader Joe’s stores have very clear spending and behavioral guidelines, they have few execution guidelines–meaning the corporate office may tell workers what to do but not how to do it. Basically, the company believes that people–given the opportunity–usually make good decisions about things like signage and merchandising.

But Trader Joe’s is not just about the individual. Part of the chain’s allure to prospective employees is the opportunity to be part of a collaborative working environment.

Along these lines, the chain has established a peer network in which managers talk to and work with each other on developing and implementing best practices at work. “They operate six or eight ‘mother’ stores across the country where they try a lot of new ideas. If an idea works, they have what they call a show-and-tell visit,” observes The Boston Consulting Group’s Lintner. “They pick up mother store managers and take them to mother stores so everyone can see what’s being done.” All retail chains have certain “test stores.” But, as observers point out, the trick is allowing people in the field to share information on successes and failures. “Everyone talks about teamwork and the team approach to store development,” says one retail executive. “Trader Joe’s has taken it from lip service to reality.”

There is little, if anything, that Trader Joe’s doesn’t do right when it comes to recruiting and retaining what is generally considered to be one of the retail industry’s best staffs. One reason is that virtually everything it does runs counter to conventional industry wisdom.

Most companies typically think that what an individual brings to an organization dictates job performance and how long they stay with an organization. Industry experts don’t dispute the importance of job performance on its own. However, says Blake Frank of the University of Dallas, research shows that what an organization does for its employees once they get there has a huge impact on retention and performance. Frank learned this firsthand while co-authoring a recent report from the Coca-Cola Retailing Research Council entitled “New Ideas for Retaining Store Level Employees.”

For hourly workers, there are three classes of characteristics related to employee retention: providing directions, equipment and supplies, and immediate supervision. Using either formal classroom training or on-the-job experience, Trader Joe’s clearly fills the bill on all three.

Providing directions is simple, but many retailers fail in this area. It simply means that workers need to know what to do to be able to do it. “If employees don’t know what to do, they become frustrated. This leads to job dissatisfaction and employee turnover. It’s important that a company provide written guidance for a job, but [it must] also focus on the results and not just the task itself,” says Frank, adding that Trader Joe’s focus on training and the importance of simply treating customers well is one reason for its significantly lower turnover rates.

Offer immediate feedback

This point ties directly into the area of immediate supervision. “This is an important but broad area,” says Frank. He emphasizes that it covers such areas as recognizing employees for doing a good job and how supervisors communicate the goals of the organization. For hourly workers, like those at Trader Joe’s, immediate feedback from managers and assistant store managers is essential because of the high levels of customer service required. “When supervision falls down, it impacts the whole organization, and there’s lots of research showing that when people leave an organization, it is because of their immediate supervisor,” Frank observes.

The average retention rate in a Coca-Cola study was 97 days, meaning that 50 percent of new hires left within that time. Moreover, when half of a company’s workforce is turning over every 97 days, that turnover gets expensive. In a nonunion environment like Trader Joe’s, it costs approximately $2,286 to replace a cashier. When you factor in the customers who might be lost due to longer waiting time at the checkout and other factors, the cost of replacing an employee jumps to $4,200. And just because an employee is a part-timer doesn’t mean he or she is inexpensive.

Frank and other observers believe that companies like Trader Joe’s are doing things that make a difference. For instance, managers help out at the checkout and sweep up when needed, which workers down the chain see. Crew members also get the supervision and feedback they need, which helps to boost morale. More important, actions like this help to create good long-term employees who, like many of those who start on a part-time basis at Trader Joe’s, are looking for a career path and a company that will help them to grow.

Fostering that career path, however, means leveling with prospective employees on the nature of the retail business. Trader Joe’s makes it quite clear that there is a downside to being in such a fun and rewarding environment. The company states up front to potential hires that hours can be long and weekend work is common, especially for entry-level positions. But, as David Arnold, a workforce consultant with Pearson Reid London, House, notes, “Some grocers are going out of their way to give people a realistic definition and expectation of the job. Telling people who walk in the door what they need to be successful in that environment helps turnover. It’s when you don’t tell people what they’re getting into that there’s a problem.”

Another area in which Trader Joe’s excels is in showing people what some call the “rainbow” or “light at the end of the tunnel.” Demonstrating that there is a career path, or at least opportunities for advancement, helps bring higher-quality people into the organization from the outset. “It’s good that [Trader Joe’s has] been able to show how people move up in the organization and that it’s not necessarily going to take six or seven years of scanning products to get there,” Arnold says. “You have to show them they can move up in one or two years, or else you start to lose good people.”

A strong upward and downward communication chain underscores the management and organizational style adopted by Trader Joe’s. This means fostering a belief that the store group operates as a team and that individual opinions are valued, rather than an environment where people speak out and are either not heard or have their opinions suppressed.

Consumer activist, corporate gadfly, and sometime politician Ralph Nader has often said that large organizations today act like lords and masters and that most employees have been sufficiently desensitized to act like serfs. Whether this is true is up for debate. But employers usually get the employees they deserve. That being the case, Trader Joe’s gets some of the best.

Excerpted from Trader Joe’s Adventure, by Len Lewis, Copyright 2005 by Dearborn Trade Publishing.

Posted on June 2, 2005June 29, 2023

The Expanding Outsourcing Market

B elow are charts from the Everest Group showing the number of employees covered under HR outsourcing contracts, the functions being outsourced, how costs are being affected and more.



Coverage Expands


Since the inception of multiprocess HR outsourcing seven years ago, the number of employees covered has increased by more than 100-fold, to 3.7 million as of March 31.



Source: The Everest Group

 


Costs Come Down


Competition among vendors and economies of scale have helped push down the price per employee for multiprocess HR outsourcing contracts by more than a third both for large and very large companies.



Source: The Everest Group

 


Business On The Rise


Since 2000, as the nascent multiprocess HR outsourcing industry took off, the total value of worldwide contracts has grown more than 250% to $12.5 billion in 2004.



*As of March 31, 2005
Source: The Everest Group

 


Transactional Focus


Not surprisingly, the more transaction-oriented the HR process, the more likely it is to be included in a multiprocess HR outsourcing contract, according to a March survey of 99 companies with such deals.



Source: The Everest Group

Workforce Management, June 2005, p. 54 —Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 2, 2005June 29, 2023

Temp-to-Hire is Becoming a Full-Time Practice at Firms

Last fall, when T-Mobile needed hundreds of engineers and technicians for the new cell system it acquired from a competitor, the company went straight to its staffing vendors. Other than perhaps for the numbers, it was a routine procurement. There was one exception, however: T-Mobile took the opportunity to include a temp-to-hire clause in the contract.



    “It’s not been a regular course of business in the past,” says John Sullivan, T-Mobile area director of engineering and operations for Northern California. He supervises some 250 employees, of whom about 110 are contingent workers. Of the company’s 22,000 employees nationwide, 20 percent to 30 percent are contingent.


    “Many of them are not necessarily interested in full-time work,” he says. “But for those who are, it’s a chance for us to see who’s a fit and it gives them the chance to see this is a pretty good place.”


    T-Mobile didn’t set out to use the temporary engagements as a tryout period; it didn’t intend to use the staffing vendors as a sort of outsourced recruiter. But when the opportunity arose, the company figured, “Why not?” Sullivan says.


    “Why not?” increasingly appears to be a question being asked by companies already comfortable with hiring temporary workers. Whether they turned to contingent workers because of a sudden upturn in business and then developed a strategy around the need or they strategically decided to build a flexible workforce before hiring their first temp, these companies are finding hidden values in what was once regarded as second-class staff.


    It’s a hiring tactic and not a workforce strategy, says Simon Billsberry, CEO of Kineticom, a staffing contractor in San Diego. But “as a tactic it’s very beneficial. We’re seeing it more. There is significant growth in the temp-to-perm area.”


    “Try before you buy” is becoming quite popular in some areas, Billsberry adds–so much so that the largest of the companies with flexible workforces have been pushing staffing contractors to cut or even eliminate the conversion fees they have to pay when hiring a contingent worker.


    Losing an office temp to a client has long been a fact of life for companies like Kelly, Manpower and AppleOne. They and other staffing contractors try to limit the practice by assessing fees sometimes exceeding 30 percent of a year’s salary to the hiring company. But finding office workers is a snap compared to hiring an engineer with specialized skills in a growth area. To staffing companies, such employees are a revenue-making asset that they don’t want to have to keep replacing if they can avoid it. Increasingly, though, they can’t.


    Gary Noke, president of Decision Logic, a division of TAC Worldwide Cos., says that after one of his company’s workers has been on a client job for six months, the client can hire the worker without a fee. “The larger companies are forcing that on the contractors,” Noke says. With larger companies, that fee-free conversion provision is always required, he says.



Contractor as recruiter
    With the iffy economic recovery, companies that in another time would have ramped up their full-time staff are hiring contingent workers with a conversion right. Once they become convinced that the business uptick isn’t just a temporary spike, they’ll look first to the temporary workers to fill vacancies.


    “Your contractor,” Noke says, “becomes your recruiter.”


    Staffing companies uniformly grumble about that: They do the recruiting, while the client gets to pick over the staff and hire away the best of the workers.


    “There is a war for talent,” says Billsberry, whose company–like all the staffing contractors–recruits year round. “We compete for the best people with everyone else. It’s in my best interest to keep them working because they’ll go somewhere else.” It’s a competition among two or three other staffing companies to find talent and keep them working with Kineticom’s clients, he says.


    The only ace for the contractors is that many of the most in-demand workers prefer short-term assignments and would rather not work for a single company.



“The companies that get it are moving to have a permanent flexible workforce. And most of the bigger companies get it.”
–Gary Noke,
president of Decision Logic



    That’s long been the case for IT workers and certain types of engineers who naturally fit into project work. When the project ends, they move on to another–sometimes with the same company, but often not. At the end of the 20th century, with the specter of wholesale computer failures looming, thousands of programmers came out of retirement and academia and even left regular jobs to take on high-paying Y2K projects. In January 2001, they retired again or signed on with staffing contractors for project work rather than go back to full-time cubicle life.


    T-Mobile’s Sullivan says that even though he has a fee-free conversion right, he believes that most of his contingent workers aren’t interested in becoming employees. There are cultural issues–many of his techs are noncitizens–that might prevent it. The pay differential is higher for a temp and, Sullivan says, “some people just like to be able to do something different.”


    Hiring contingent workers was once a matter of necessity to help a company get through a busy cycle. And working as a temp was a matter of survival, a way to earn some money until the next “real” job came along.


    That’s still the case and, say recruiters and staffing contractors, likely always will be.


    Mellon Bank, for instance, was ramping up for a special credit card offer and needed hundreds of short-term workers at its call center in New Jersey. Greg Antonelle, recruiting director for AimHire Associates, helped fill the bank’s need. As the campaign winds down, the temp staff will too.


    But with the changing nature of the economy and with highly skilled IT workers blazing the trail over the past two decades, building a flexible workforce has become a strategy and not just a tactic. Adding contingent workers to the workforce mix is an accepted way of doing business not only at the Fortune 500 level, but increasingly for medium-sized businesses as well.


    A strategically hired contingent workforce can be even more productive than full-time staff, says Chris Hagler, national director of strategic services for Resources Global Professional. “They don’t get involved in company politics,” Hagler says. “They are not wrapped up in all the things you find staff talking about at the water cooler. They come in and do their job.”



Hiring to fit unique needs
    Companies make a strategic workforce decision by sizing up their cyclical needs, workforce costs, time to hire, core functions and even image. Looking at each of these components and deciding both their value and how they can best be managed will lead to developing a workforce strategy that might include a mix of full- and part-time employees, contingent workers and outsourced work.


    Hagler, who helps companies work through these issues, offers an example. For Coca-Cola, marketing is a core function, but accounts receivable is not, she says. And so the company keeps its marketing operation in-house, with full-time staff, and outsources the accounting function. For a bottler, the decision might be to have only a minimum number of line workers and supplement them with temps to handle sudden demand.


    “If you have a really strategic HR person, they will look at what is core and what is not. They’ll work with the other divisions to assess demand and need and develop an overall strategy that creates a flexible workforce,” Hagler says.


    Her company, like many of its rivals, specializes in placing professional talent including accountants, chief information officers, supply-chain specialists and HR experts. Resources Global Professional recently began to provide lawyers on a temporary basis.


    American Staffing Association data attest to the strength of the temp market. The ASA reported that last year nearly 2.5 million people on average were working as contract and temporary employees every day, the highest level since the go-go days of 2000. That was almost 2 percent of the nation’s total nonfarm workforce. To keep that many people working, staffing firms had to recruit and hire 11.7 million employees during the year.


    The ASA estimates that 8 million of them transitioned to full-time work during the year, but not necessarily with their client’s company. However, an ASA survey found that conversion fees paid to staffing companies for hiring away their workers came to $7.3 billion last year, which represents almost 10 percent of total revenue for the staffing industry.


    Analysts project that the staffing industry will see even greater growth this year, not only because of organic economic growth but because large companies are embracing the concept.


    “The companies that get it are moving to have a permanent flexible workforce,” Noke says. “And most of the bigger companies get it.”


    One of those companies is Johnson & Johnson.


    Olivia Baumgartner, a recruiter with Johnson & Johnson Professional Recruiting, the company’s internal hiring arm, says contingent workers are a key part of the company’s workforce. Indeed, about half the 90 employees in her office are temporary consultants. “We just grew so fast,” she says.


    Baumgartner has worked in human resources for several companies, including a recent stint as a manager at Hewlett-Packard, and says she has seen contingent staffing become a way of life.


    “It’s cost-effective and it gives a company a chance to look over the workers and try and buy,” she says. Workers like it too, Baumgartner adds. “They get a chance to learn about a company and get a broad exposure to the different ways companies do things.”


    She should know. At HP and now at Johnson & Johnson, Baumgartner is part of the contingent staff.


Workforce Management, June 2005, pp. 82-85 —Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 2, 2005July 10, 2018

Core Values, Devalued

Why aren’t employees happy? It’s a question organizations constantly face and try to address, in part, through motivational programs and books. In the view of E.L. Kersten, such efforts are wasted and only compound the problem of employee dissatisfaction. In his radical new book, The Art of Demotivation, Kersten offers his vision of a new workplace, powered not by self-confident and empowered employees but by workers who have been “radically demotivated.” In this excerpt, Kersten explains that a first step is the creation of a collusive relationship with employees, “one that systematically suppresses acknowledgment of the dynamics that violate the relationship in order to maintain the relationship.” The beginning of that collusive relationship is a very special set of core values.



A visionary organization’s core values must be authentically believed and lived–particularly by the organization’s leadership–if they are to provide their intended inspiration and guidance to the employees. Since Radical Demotivation™ replaces inspiration and guidance with collusion as the intended purpose for articulating the company’s core values, authenticity is unnecessary, and in some cases, it may be an obstacle. It is far more important that the stated values be acceptable to the employees than that they be believed by the executives. This will not only lead the employees to accept them as being authentic, it will make it easy for executives to violate them. Along that line, I have developed a few guidelines for stating core values that accelerate the process of Radical Demotivation™:



    Guideline 1: The development of your company’s core values should be outsourced to consultants. Executives are often tempted to perform this task themselves, but when they do, the values they articulate tend to have too many references to “profitability” and “shareholder value”–things for which their employees have no regard. Consequently, they diminish the values’ collusive potential. In contrast, a good consulting company with a core competency in public relations can craft a set of values that the average wage-earner will find seductively appealing.


    Guideline 2: Core values should not be anchored to any transcendent social values. Some companies are part of industries that have the potential to fulfill values that virtually all of us hold. For example, pharmaceutical companies can serve the public good by helping to eradicate disease and relieve pain. Though it is tempting to refer to socially transcendent values in the statement of the company’s core value, you run the risk of creating a vision for your employees that is larger than the company.


    The problem with this is that it makes employees feel good about themselves, and despite the apparent benefits, it has the unintended consequence of reinforcing their narcissism. Fortunately, most of you own or run companies with little, if any, redeeming social value; they exist primarily to make you wealthy, and to provide access, for both you and your family, to the stature and respect that only money can buy. Therefore your value statements should be peppered with phrases like “quality products,” “industry leader,” “innovative” and “customer satisfaction.” These expressions have the benefit of generating widespread assent, while at the same time being devoid of any concrete semantic content.


    Guideline 3: Core values should be stated as ambiguously as possible. Stating your values ambiguously has two key benefits: (a) Employees will tend to infuse ambiguous statements with their own meanings, thereby generating widespread assent among people who hold significantly different understandings of the statements; and (b) the multiple meanings afforded to an ambiguous statement make it more difficult to hold you accountable for violating the value.


    Guideline 4: Your values should be inconsistent with your strategic market focus. In a Radically Demotivating corporate culture you need to determine your value discipline and state core values that conflict with it. For example, if your value discipline is operational efficiency and you have a budget that requires that you be lean and efficient, include a core value statement that references customer intimacy–something like “We go the extra mile for our customers.” If you do, your employees will always be conflicted between the company’s stated value (customer intimacy) and its clear, omnipresent, unarticulated value (operational efficiency). This creates a lose/lose situation for the employee. If they resolve the conflict in favor of the customer they can be chided for being slow, wasteful, or inefficient. On the other hand, if they resolve the conflict by efficiently discounting the customer’s input, they can be reproved for violating the company’s core values.


    This creates a win/win situation for executives. It gives them the freedom to be inconsistent–or even capricious–in their criticism of the way employees choose to resolve the conflict. Since any criticism can be rooted in the competing value, the conflict has the effect of taking any institutional power that would be conferred on the employees by acting consistent with one of the values and transferring that power to the executive who trumps them by pointing to the competing value.


    Since most of the employees will accept your core values without question, the conflict will manifest itself as an ill-defined sense of failure that they will learn to live with. Those that do identify and articulate the conflict are at risk of becoming troublemakers. If they begin to spread their theories about the value conflict, fire them before lucidity spreads throughout the organization like a staph infection.


    Guideline 5: One or more values should be anchored to objectives over which the employee has little control. The most obvious example is to create a value that targets customer satisfaction. Then, when a service or product fails, the employee is caught between trying to follow the company’s policy for handling such matters and satisfying the customers. If the employee has enough failure experiences and is reproached accordingly for violating the core value, he will begin to resent the customers. This will make it harder for him to treat them well and the entire demotivating process will begin again.


    Guideline 6: At least one of your core values should be employee-oriented. One of the old standards that has been used in scores of companies is very simply: “We treat our employees with respect and dignity.” Your employees will naturally buy into the value and hope that it is true, but with every conflict they encounter that resolves against them they will grow increasingly cynical.


    Now, imagine a workforce that is wholly committed to a set of values that simultaneously constrains their behavior and affords you the freedom to do as you please. Imagine a situation in which the employees who are typically the most obstinate and indignant are rendered mute by their hypocritical violation of the values they have publicly professed their allegiance to. Now imagine that you don’t have to imagine anymore. This is the promise of Radical Demotivation™.


Workforce Management, June 2005, pp. 10-12 —Subscribe Now!

Posted on June 2, 2005July 10, 2018

Leader Summit Series Employee Benefits

Competitive benefits programs are critical to effective workforce management. Though necessary to attract and retain quality employees, administration of such programs can be resource-intensive. When choosing a benefits administrator, legal compliance, easy integration, and dedicated account and support teams are a must—and above all, it's got to be good for the bottom line. Companies are re-thinking new strategies for benefits because of recent market, technology, and legal influences. The burden falls on Human Resource departments to "do more with less."

One major player in the benefits administration field—ADP—offers cost effective comprehensive and flexible solutions to meet vital business needs. With a proven 50 year track record in providing benefits outsourcing for large companies, ADP offers cutting-edge solutions that are fully customizable to serve and expertly provide whatever is needed to achieve benefits success—from a standalone product to completely integrated systems. In addition, ADP is a front-runner in providing the most noteworthy new trend—Employee Self Service (ESS).

Recent research suggests that benefits administration is likely to be almost exclusively ESS within the next few years. The systems are easy to navigate and use for participants, with no formal training required. Employees nationwide have embraced ESS—they are even likely to expect having control of managing their own benefits without involving HR staff. And businesses have embraced not only the reduction of repetitive inquiries and administrative tasks, but also the peace of mind in knowing that the latest legal issues and best practices are already integrated in their systems.

Vincent De Palma, President of ADP Benefit Services, provides further insight and solutions for some of these strategic challenges. Mr. De Palma leads the ADP Benefit Services business unit that includes ADP's Retirement Services and Health & Welfare Administration Services. ADP Benefit Services is responsible for delivering World Class benefit services across all markets served by ADP Employer Services. He joined the Employer Services Division of ADP in February 1999 as Senior Vice President-Group Marketing. In that role, in addition to overseeing all of ADP Employer Services Marketing and Marketing Communications deliverables, Mr. De Palma established strategic web marketing initiatives and client services guidelines.

How is technology changing the face of benefits administration?

Employee self-service acceptance has led to new ways to leverage this technology beyond open enrollment. ADP is seeing clients use it year around—for new hires, life events and employee surveys. Additionally, companies are adding functionality, such as cost modeling and plan comparisons, to help employees with their benefit decisions.

What recent legal changes regarding FMLA, ADA, or other workforce-related acts or laws should organizations be aware of?

At the start of the year, several changes to COBRA regulations involving the types and timing of notices required went into effect. Additionally, ADP is closely watching several legislative proposals that have been introduced, which would alter FMLA compliance at both the state and federal levels. For more information, visit www.adpeverybodybenefits.com.

How does your specific product or service help companies maximize bottom line results as they manage the workforce?

ADP’s 20+ years of benefits administration expertise helps companies remove the burden associated with administrative tasks, such as employee inquiries and data processing/management. This allows businesses to focus on core strategic priorities, while increasing cost efficiencies. Further, ADP embeds its compliance expertise to help alleviate this burden and mitigate regulatory risk.

In this volatile market, human resources must be cognizant of protecting both their organization and employers by minimizing the risk on pension and retirement plans. What should companies be looking for from retirement and 401(k) providers, as they develop a program that offers a sound variety of both 401(k) and retirement programs?

Companies should look to providers whose 401(k) programs are designed with the best interest of the participants in mind. ADP’s independence from the management of investments ensures objectivity and is aligned to help providers structure a retirement plan portfolio that meets the various needs of plan participants.

Posted on June 1, 2005July 10, 2018

State Laws Stand in the Way of HSAs


In some states, laws regulating employee benefits are stunting the growth of health savings accounts, according to Business Insurance.


Under federal law, a health savings account must be linked with a health plan that has a deductible of at least $1,000 for single employees and $2,000 for families.


State health benefits laws are all over the board, and pose myriad problems. Some states, for example, require that employers offer plans with lower deductibles than the $1,000/$2,000 floors. Other states require that employers cover certain tests and procedures. That’s at odds with the basic idea of high-deductible plans and health savings accounts, in which the account is tapped until the deductible is reached. New Jersey, for example, requires employers to pay for tests of lead in children, Business Insurance reports.


Some state governments, prodded by lobbyists from health plans, are working to change their laws, but the process is moving at different paces–sometimes slower than employers would like–in each state.


For more information on health savings accounts, see “The Lowdown on Health Savings Accounts.”

Posted on May 31, 2005July 10, 2018

Measure Could Avert Pension Terminations

Just days before United Airlines and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. announced an agreement to terminate the airline’s pension plan, a bill was introduced that may save other airlines from the same fate.

On April 20, Sen. Johnny Isakson, R-Georgia, presented the Employee Pension Preservation Act of 2005, which would allow airlines to spread the funding of their pension plans over 25 years, instead of the current four, as long as they freeze new benefit accruals or pay for them upfront. The bill, which was co-sponsored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-West Virginia, would require airlines to get union approval before taking this action.


The proposal is particularly welcomed by the airline industry, given the uproar in the wake of United Airlines’ decision to terminate its pension plan. On May 10, a U.S. bankruptcy judge approved the airline’s plan to transfer all four of its underfunded pension plans—amounting to $9.8 billion in liabilities—to the PBGC. The termination has been met with fierce opposition from unions, which have threatened strikes.


Andrea Newman, senior vice president of government affairs at Northwest Airlines, says the bill would help airlines avoid going into bankruptcy and having to renege on their promise to workers. “United has shed enormous liability, and what you would expect to happen is that more legacy carriers will have to do the same thing,” she says. Northwest’s plan is underfunded by $3.8 billion.


Delta Airlines, which worked closely with Isakson’s staff on the proposal, sees the bill as essential, says Benet Wilson, a Delta spokeswoman. Delta froze its defined-benefit plan, which is underfunded by $5.3 billion, to new employees in 2003 and just last month warned that it expects to report substantial losses for the rest of the year and could be forced to seek bankruptcy court protection.


For unions, the legislation could mean more bargaining room. “For an employer to do this they need consent from the union, and that means the union would be able to extract something else for that consent,” says Norman Stein, a law professor at the University of Alabama. This kind of bargaining power is a valued commodity, particularly in light of the United situation, where workers found themselves battling the bankruptcy of their company or losing their pensions. The Air Line Pilots Association says it supports the plan.


The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, however, is against the proposal because it would restrict the type of retirement plan that it could negotiate for its members, union spokesman Joe Tiberi says.


If future benefits are frozen, the only plan employers would be able to offer are defined-contribution plans, Tiberi says. “We believe there are ways to deal with the companies’ issues while still securing retirement income for the workers.”


The PBGC has not taken a position on the legislation. “We’re willing to look at any proposal that would keep unfunded liabilities off of the government’s books, but we have to be sure that plan participants and the pension insurance program are protected,” says Randy Clerihue, a PBGC spokesman.


The proposal comes as the Bush administration is discussing a complete overhaul of the pension funding system. And some say that despite the United situation, the bigger pension reform may take precedence over a proposal focusing solely on the airlines. Isakson, however, says that the two proposals go hand in hand. “My bill is industry-specific, but the components are still the same,” he says. “The sense of urgency that our bill portends is good for everyone.”


—Jessica Marquez


 

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress