Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on May 18, 2005July 10, 2018

Productivity Remains High in China, U.S., Japan, India

The gap between how fast productivity is growing in the European Union versus growth in the U.S widened for the 10th consecutive year in 2004, according to the Conference Board.

At 6.3 percent annually, productivity growth is very high in China, according to the latest available figure from that country (where economic data is harder to come by and is often open to debate). It’s also high in India at 3.8 percent growth in 2004, the U.S. at 3.1 percent and Japan at 3.6 percent. Latin America and Africa generally are experiencing low rates of productivity.


Productivity growth in Europe, while on the rise, is still only about 1.6 percent, significantly less than in the U.S.


Robert McGuckin, director of economic research at the Conference Board, says that as Europe rebuilt after World War II, the gap between Europe and the U.S. was much smaller than now.


That stopped around 1995. He attributes the change partly to regulations, particularly in Western Europe, that have made it difficult for companies to do business. These include restrictions on land use, store hours and more. Many companies operate globally but avoid Western Europe. “Europe needs some structural reform,” he says.


McGuckin says that U.S. companies have pioneered new ways of running businesses. Fifty years ago, Procter & Gamble, for example, would just “shove the goods out the door. Inventory was a problem.”


Now, Wal-Mart and other companies have made a science out of buying and selling goods, first using software and later the Internet. These practices have yet to penetrate the financial and services sectors as much in Europe as they have in the U.S.

Posted on May 17, 2005July 10, 2018

Army Getting Creative With Recruiting; New Report Examines Reserve Call-ups

With the Army failing to meet its recruiting goals, U.S. Army Secretary Francis Harvey says, “I’ve challenged our human resources people to get as innovative as they can.”


With that, the Army is aiming its new ads more at parents than potential soldiers, according to the Army Times. One spot shows a son trying to convince his dad that the Army is a good idea, saying, “I’m going to be part of something that’s important.” Another, in Spanish, shows a young man telling his father, “With the training and experience I get, this is going to change my life.” The ads are running on major networks and smaller channels such as the Food Network.


The Army is also suspending its recruiting efforts May 20 to train recruiters in which tactics are–or are not–appropriate to entice young men and women to join the military. The action comes after reports of recruiting abuses, including the enlistment of a mentally ill man, and reports of a recruiter instructing a student in how to fake a high school diploma.


Meanwhile, according to the Classified Intelligence Report, “CareerBuilder has seen a 40 percent jump in military postings since the first of the year” and the Army will spend about $17.8 million this year on online recruiting.


The reserves
Meanwhile, on the reservist front, the Congressional Budget Office last week released a report discussing the effect that the call-ups of reserves have had on businesses.


The evidence at this point is very limited, partly because only a small minority of businesses employ reserves, and there is little data on how many reserves have highly specialized skills or who are key employees. The CBO relied on a limited set of interviews with employers who employ reservists.


The CBO found that smaller employers are more affected than large ones by reserve call-ups, and that some very small businesses actually shut down during the mobilizations. The adjustment was more difficult when companies received little warning–sometimes less than three days’ notice–that an employee was being called up.

Posted on May 13, 2005July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Could Our Human Resources Arm Contribute to Executive Development

Dear Lost:



Your talent-management strategy needs to support your hospital’s overall strategy. Consider not only your current recruiting and training methods, but also how your strategy may need to adapt to future market conditions.

Forecasting the future is very difficult. It can be helpful to ask some basic questions regarding how your middle managers will put strategy into practice. Figure out how development efforts tie in tocareer development,performance management, succession planning and the like. Do you have enough people to fill these roles now? What about 5 or 10 years down the road? We recently worked with one hospital that discovered that an alarming 50 percent of its managers were eligible for retirement within five years. That caused them to worry less about training employees and more about recruitment and succession planning.

Additionally, determine the competencies your executives need to drive the company strategy. You say your training program needs to be comprehensive, but sometimes an A-to-Z approach can dilute your overall effort. It is far more beneficial to determine which competencies are needed, perform a gap analysis, and then fill those gaps. Only then can you start thinking about the development program itself. (I am reluctant to call it a training program, although that may be the ultimate format you select.) Classroom training serves a certain purpose. But management development takes a variety of other forms in lieu of, or in addition to, classroom training. These include on-the-job training, special projects, job rotation, mentoring, external seminars and Web-based learning. Your end goal determines the combination of training methods you use, as well as the best learning environment for your managers.

SOURCE: Keith Swenson, managing partner,Capital H Group, Chicago, July 6, 2004.

LEARN MORE: A Sample Leadership Strategy.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on May 13, 2005July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Can I Convince Management to Provide Money for Our Initiatives

Dear Budgetless:



First you need to take a step back. You’re thinking tactically with the list of projects you would like to pursue. If you want to be a strategic partner to the business, you need to start thinking and acting strategically from the beginning.

You’re going to need a vision of what a strategic human resources function will look like and how it will positively influence the performance of the business. This is the perfect time to create such a vision, since you mention that the organization is restructuring. Creating a vision can be difficult. But it’s a worthwhile exercise to align human resources to the business’s priorities. Plus, it will help you determine how each of your initiatives best supports the company’s business plans. Once the vision is created, you will need to market this vision to senior management and your internal customers. People–not equipment–offer the best chance for any organization to gain a competitive advantage. Your goal is to ensure that the executive team also believes this.

To back up this vision, you and your colleagues need to become experts on best practices for human resources. Pay attention to trends and apply this knowledge to the business. From this position of authority, you’ll be able to advise your executive team on how human resources can bring about change that leads to higher performance levels.

Get the human resources department to behave like a business unit, leaving behind older transactional models. Start measuring performance and the customer value that human resources provides. Share these metrics, along with their associated goals, with executives and customers. This helps them share in the vision you have for human resources, and mark its progress.

Once you make strides in accomplishing your vision, and compile a track record of helping the organization, requesting money and resources becomes easier. Human resources will cease to be viewed as a drain on profit and instead emerge as a tool to enhance the bottom line.

SOURCE: Ted Stephens, principal,Intellilink Solutions, Inc., New York City, July 17, 2004.

LEARN MORE:Strategic Human Resources Actions.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on May 13, 2005July 10, 2018

Employee Morale Is Up, but That’s Not Saying Much

While U.S. employees have grown more confident in prospects for their companies’ success, the American workforce is still unenthused, creating challenges for employers.

Seventy-three percent of employees are confident their organization “will be successful in the future,” compared with 63 percent in 2002, according to a Mercer Human Resource Consulting survey of working adults at more than 800 organizations. Also, 49 percent of employees feel that their organizations are well-managed, up from 40 percent in 2002.


Despite the rise in employee confidence, the data can still be seen as an ominous sign for companies. The majority of employees—51 percent–do not feel their organizations are well-managed. A recent Harris poll also painted a relatively negative picture of employee satisfaction.


Rod Fralicx, Mercer’s global employee research director, notes that although Mercer’s findings do show an improvement in employees’ feelings toward their companies, it’s fairly faint praise. Morale in the U.S. was so low in 2002 that the comparison offers “a very low bar to cross.”


“You still have less than half the people feeling that management is doing a good job,” Fralicx says. “And 40 percent of the U.S. population is vulnerable to leaving their jobs. I don’t think that’s good news.”


Fralicx says that with the upcoming retirement of the baby boom generation, “there’s going to be a big, big talent war going on.” He recommends that companies immediately start working to plan for this war, such as trying to improve the commitment levels of employees.


Mercer researchers pinpointed the eight biggest drivers of an employee’s commitment to an organization: 


  • Employees’ confidence in their future with the organization
  • Employees’ confidence in achieving career objectives
  • Employees’ confidence in the future success of their organization
  • Degree of teamwork and cooperation
  • Employees’ satisfaction with the type of work they do
  • The chance to do challenging and interesting work
  • The company’s commitment to quality
  • Opportunities for continuous learning to improve skills

Fralicx says that some of the eight have greater importance than others, depending on the company. Also, within a company the biggest drivers vary. What motivates the marketing staff in a hospital is different than what motivates a nurse.


At one large financial services organization, he says, employees had lost confidence in the ability of management to communicate a clear vision for the company. The firm was an almagamation of 50 different companies brought together through acquisitions. The executives worked on a major initiative to explain the company’s mission, and Fralicx says of the communication problems, “Those things went away.”

Posted on May 11, 2005July 10, 2018

Boom Times for Recruiting Vendors

A war for talent and increased turnover make for good buzz, but a stronger economy makes for good news. And it’s particularly welcome for a company that brings together employers and job seekers.



    Major players in this arena are experiencing sustained booms. Job site CareerBuilder.com, whose technology powers online classifieds for newspapers owned by Knight Ridder, Gannett and the Tribune Co., reported a record number of unique visitors to its Web site in January.


    Executive recruiting firm Korn/Ferry saw its domestic revenues rise by 31 percent for the 12 months ending January 31. Its success generally coincides with a rebound in that specialty after a three-year slump. Businesses adjusting their mix of human resources-related services help the bottom line of companies like Recruitmax, whose software helps attract and acquire talent.


    Temporary workers, who typically constitute about 2 percent of the workforce in times of economic growth, are finding that companies are eager to convert them to permanent status. That generates additional fee revenue for providers of temporary help like Kelly Services.


    Companies that enjoyed having their pick of workers in 2002 now find themselves having to scramble for talent. Not only are frustrated workers looking around more, but they also have more means than ever to find their next gig.


    For now, the economy appears sufficiently strong to keep vendors in nearly every segment busy well into the second half of this year. One reason is that getting a better job requires sophistication.


    “Job seekers need to use up to six different online resources to maximize their reach,” says Peter Weddle, author, consultant and CEO of Weddle’s Publications, based in Stamford, Connecticut. That includes two general-purpose job sites and at least three niche boards–one that is germane to their profession, another to their industry and a third based on geography.


    Businesses, of course, rely on similarly diverse channels. When Jill Pfefferbaum has to fill openings at travel Web site Priceline.com, she starts by posting the job internally and also on Monster, then peppers her network with a description of the job.


    “Anything I can think of,” says Pfefferbaum, the company’s director of compensation. “Friends, family and the ‘Big Red Bulletin Board,’ ” an electronic exchange for her fellow graduates of Cornell University.


    Lately she has experimented with LinkedIn, a growing professional networking site. Finding candidates there, she says, shows that they’re “innovative in ways of developing their own networks,” which is particularly useful for business development. Pfefferbaum relies on free services to conserve her budget.


    Companies still seek human assistance in hiring effectively, and the popularity of employee referral programs is proof of that. A CareerXroads survey on hiring shows that employee referrals in 2004 accounted for nearly 32 percent of hiring sources, compared with 28.5 percent in 2003.


    “Employee referral programs are cheap and proven,” says Deborah Besemer, CEO of BrassRing in Waltham, Massachusetts. The elements are a company intranet that is well-designed and well-publicized and a workforce that is open to telling people about the company.


    “If you have loyal and engaged employees, there is a natural pride in making referrals,” says Joe Hammill, director of talent acquisition for office and printing services provider Xerox in Rochester, New York.


    While companies turn to employees to help build culture, they use another resource to help build expertise–the Internet’s niche boards, which allow greater depth and specialized searching than the mainstream boards. There is certainly no shortage of them.


    Weddle estimates that there are about 30,000 niche boards on the Web. And recruiters find them extremely useful. In a recent survey, 84 percent of recruiters said that niche sites provide access to the best talent. Only 11 percent said that about general-purpose recruiting sites.


    Nevertheless, Weddle predicts that the niche boards will soon have to act more as full-service career destinations, complete with elements such as an advice columnist and content that helps a user manage a career, like ways to acquire new skills. That could drive some users away from the sites, which currently rely on a sense of professional kinship as their primary attraction. “The best talent likes to hang out with peers,” Weddle says.


    Monster, meanwhile, is changing the way it intends to grow. It recently hired 100 people to pursue new customer acquisitions, focusing on prospects in small and medium-sized company markets, where employers had not previously advertised jobs online.


Workforce Management, May 2005, pp. 51-52 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on May 10, 2005July 10, 2018

HR Chiefs Are Pricier By The Pound

British human resources executives pull down the biggest paychecks and easily surpass their U.S. counterparts in both base salary and total cash compensation, according to a new global pay survey from Mercer Human Resource Consulting. The HR executive in the United Kingdom also receive a larger portion of their compensation in bonuses and allowances, which account for 23 percent of their total cash, compared with 19 percent of total cash for U.S. HR executives.

Although U.S. companies pay less than U.K. companies for their human resources executives, that’s not the case for U.S. executives in finance, sales and marketing, and supply and logistics. They are the highest-paid in the world. In most countries, the top finance and marketing executives are the highest-paid heads of a function. In the United Kingdom and Hong Kong, however, the head of information technology is the top earner.


 


Annual Compensation (U.S. $) in 2004 for Head of Human Resources
CountryMidrange base salary*Midrange total cash compensation**
Italy$143,996$163,964
Denmark144,781166,171
Hong Kong137,667172,772
Canada136,797177,591
Mexico126,709178,332
Belgium169,847195,318
Germany153,135199,370
Switzerland167,213203,885
United States174,670213,050
United Kingdom184,546231,323
*Monthly salary multiplied by number of months (based on the company policy).
**Includes total annual base salary plus any guaranteed cash and the actual annual short-term incentive amount.

Source: Mercer Human Resource Consulting’s Global Pay Summary, 2004/2005. Exchange rates as of year-end 2004.


Posted on May 10, 2005July 10, 2018

Where Paying Dues Delivers

One of Lea Soupata’s favorite photographs captures Jim Casey, the founder of United Parcel Service, standing in one of the company’s offices in Massachusetts staring wistfully off into the distance.



    Reflecting on his image, the company’s senior vice president of people programs says, “He is just standing there, probably thinking, ‘Gee, it’s a long way from Seattle,’ ” where he founded the company in 1907.


    After rising to the top of the world’s fourth-largest employer, Soupata might just as well look at her roots in a working-class neighborhood of New York and say of herself, “Gee, it’s a long way from Queens.”


    Separating her from UPS is almost impossible. She’s been at the company for 36 years in jobs ranging from truck driver to member of the board of directors of a firm whose time-tested organizational style dates back nearly a century to the days of foot and bicycle messengers.


    Workforce management is what UPS is all about, from its liberal employee benefits program to its highly structured, almost militaristic system of internal mobility. As its 384,000-member workforce holds on to its distinction as the largest delivery and transportation company in the world, those traditions are being tested as never before.


    Today it is being chased by archrival FedEx as well as two government-assisted mail delivery monopolies, the U.S. Postal Service and Germany’s Deutsche Post World Net, the German postal service that owns the delivery company DHL. Among the key players helping UPS stay the course in the face of such stiff competition is Soupata, the daughter of a working-class Greek immigrant family.


    Her hard-earned rise through the ranks of UPS is reflection of the company’s old-school corporate values. She joined UPS when she was 19, splitting her time as a receptionist and administrative assistant in human resources at an office in Queens.


    Today she is one of the highest-paid female human resources executives in the nation, as well as one of the wealthiest, amassing company shares over the years that were worth $17 million in early April.


    She has the rare distinction among human resources executives of holding seats on her company’s executive committee as well as its board of directors. She has met and worked with Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush on one of her favorite projects, a Welfare to Work program that has allowed 60,000 people to get off public assistance and into training and jobs at UPS.


    Despite her stature and influence, those who work closely with her say she’s never forgotten where she came from. “She’s a tough cookie,” says Don Cohen, who researched UPS for his book In Good Company. “You have to be tough to do what she did.”


    Until the 1960s, when Soupata joined the company, UPS was mostly a monolithic, male institution. “A lot of white guys worked there, a lot with military backgrounds, a lot of Irish Catholics,” Cohen says. “It still has kind of a feel of a military club, but it is much more diverse.”


    CEO Mike Eskew, whose office is across the hall from Soupata’s, credits her with improving the company’s diversity numbers.


    “Lea has never forgotten what it’s like to walk in the shoes of the people on the job,” he says. “She always puts us back in the drivers’ perspective, the sorters’ perspective. Lea has helped us know that diversity is not only the right thing to do but that it has made us a better company.”



Not the fast track
    Soupata, Eskew and other members of the company’s executive team came up through the ranks, and they expect others to do the same. Many company executives at one time wore the ubiquitous brown UPS uniform. Rather than promise glamorous jobs or interesting assignments, the organization makes it clear that new hires might be put into jobs they don’t want to do.


    UPS also offers better-than-average salaries and benefits, provides health care and stock buy-ins for part-time workers, and has many opportunities for promotion. Family members of founders, executives, employees and retirees own 90 percent of the company’s stock and control 99 percent of its voting shares.


    That’s how Soupata was able to accumulate 242,000 shares of stock.


    “You are going to be working nights, be hot, get dirty. That is the way it is,” Soupata says matter-of-factly, describing the UPS culture. “There are times when you have to take a deep breath and say, ‘Don’t give up.’ That is something we live by.”


    Many executives share middle-class backgrounds and state school educations. As a no-frills exec, Soupata flies coach, doesn’t have her own personal secretary, eats in the company cafeteria and wears a company ID card around her neck like an entry-level clerk.


    She says people who want a fast career track may not make it at UPS. Although today’s corporate demands mean that the company is hiring more midcareer professionals expert in fields like technology and finance, UPS still clings to the traditional approach of starting new hires in jobs they may not like. It doesn’t recruit at Ivy League schools. And UPS continues to be famous for exacting training standards that leave nothing to chance–down to an edict to drivers about which fingers they should hold a key ring on, a time-saving technique, to an insistence on first-name folksiness.



“Lea has never forgotten what it’s
like to walk in the shoes of the people on the job. She always puts us back
in the drivers’ perspective, the sorters’ perspective. Lea has helped us
know that diversity is not only the right thing to do but that it has made us a better company.
–Mike Eskew, UPS CEO“



    “We pride ourselves in trying to take care of our people,” Eskew says. “We think our people return that to us in a lot of ways.”


    The chief executive says the company’s focus on its workforce makes Soupata and her 1,400-employee human resources division key to the company’s strategic vision.


    Marc Gunther, a senior writer at Fortune magazine, researched UPS for his book Faith and Fortune. He says UPS is in the vanguard of companies that he believes are creating “a values-driven approach” to business by treating their employees, customers and shareholders well.


    The company has “a very strong sense of togetherness and community and loyalty up and down the ranks,” he says. He likes the way people work their way up the system at UPS. “You are considered a newcomer until you are there 10 or 15 years. That is unusual in today’s world.”


    The company finished 2004 on an up note, generating $36.6 billion in revenue, a 9 percent increase, while net income rose 15 percent to $3.33 billion. The company is sitting on $5 billion in cash, a portion of which is earmarked for expansion that has taken the delivery business into banking, warehousing and retailing.


    Despite a drop-off in expected earnings during the last quarter of 2004, the firm expects earnings in 2005 to increase 13 percent to 17 percent, polishing its already stellar AAA credit rating.


    But the weaker earnings in the last quarter of 2004, accompanied by a loss of market share, led analysts at investment firm UBS to predict below-market growth beyond this year. Analysts at UBS cited intense competition from FedEx.


    The verdict is not unanimous, though. Analysts at Morningstar and Smith Barney both view the soft fourth quarter as a hiccup and say they expect UPS to continue growing, fueled by markets opening up around the world, particularly in Asia.



Brown’s blues
    With a workforce of 384,000 employees moving 14.1 million packages a day–about 2 percent of the world’s gross domestic product every 24 hours–there are many bumps in the road.


    A poor safety record caused the company to revamp its safety and training procedures, leading to a significant drop in reportable injuries and time lost because of injury. More than half of the company’s employees are in unions, primarily the Teamsters, meaning labor issues are always on the front burner.


    UPS is negotiating with the union representing its pilots, who have already taken a strike vote. Teamsters walked off the job in 1997 in a strike that was one of the company’s most painful episodes. As part of the settlement, the company agreed to make more part-time workers full time.


    The company also has defended itself against lawsuits claiming discrimination. In recent years the company has settled a suit filed by black hourly part-time employees alleging discriminatory practices in initial job assignments and other problems.


    In October, UPS lost a suit in U.S. District Court in San Francisco that was filed by deaf and hard-of-hearing workers who challenged the company’s policy excluding them from driving delivery trucks. UPS is appealing the decision.


    Part-time workers, who sometimes figure in labor and legal issues, are key to the success of UPS. The company likes to bring in new hires as part-time workers, often while they are still attending school, and groom them for bigger jobs. The part-timers and students, who receive tuition reimbursement as well as health benefits, work the hard-to-fill night shifts, when the company hubs are often busiest.


    The system is deeply ingrained in each UPS employee. Araceli Ramirez, 25, has been a part-timer at UPS for six years in a Los Angeles County office, working at different jobs while attending community college and then Cal State Los Angeles.


    Now, with a degree in hand, she is awaiting a full-time job on a management track. There are jobs available, but she is waiting for the right one. Meanwhile, she pays the bills by working as a dispatcher. “I want to wait for the perfect job opening,” she says.


    Amy Whitley, the company’s vice president of organizational development and a 21-year veteran of UPS, concentrated on human resources in getting her bachelor’s degree at Pace University in New York.


    “I knew HR was what I wanted to do,” she says. “They said, ‘That’s nice, but everyone starts at the bottom.’ I started as a driver.”


    Soupata calls experiences like those of Ramirez and Whitley getting a “UPS degree.”



Circuitous route
    These days, Soupata seems to be a long way from her start in a low-level administrative job in the human resources department and the browns she wore as a driver. She worked for UPS in New York, New Jersey, Maryland and Pennsylvania before landing at the corporate headquarters in Atlanta in 1994. Along the way she worked in sales, engineering and central sorting.


    As chief of human resources, Soupata is responsible for health and safety programs, employee relations, organizational development, workforce planning, compensation and benefits, and the UPS Foundation. She joined the company’s management committee in 1995, the same year she became chief of human resources, and became a member of the board of directors in 1998.


    Despite living in Atlanta the past 11 years, she still speaks with an accent that reveals her Queens upbringing. Her father, a florist, emigrated from Greece. Her mother, born in the U.S., was a hotel telephone reservations clerk. Soupata recalls her mother bringing her to work with her when she was 5. “To me, it was the neatest thing,” she says.


    Her husband, Sotirios “Terry” Zervoulias, is also a Greek immigrant. The couple met in 1984 through family introductions when she was 35 and he was 42. She says one of her favorite things to do is to roll back the rug and dance. “We are talking ’60s Motown,” she says.


    She attended Long Island University, a private university with campuses in the New York area, and worked at UPS to help support her family. She says she always liked work better than school.


    Soupata first met Casey, the company’s beloved founder, in New York when she was 24. She was a corporate human resources manager for a much smaller UPS. At the time, there were 400 executives in management at the company. Today there are 2,000.


    She remembers seeing Casey waiting for a bus outside the company’s New York headquarters. “I thought if I had that kind of money I would have a limousine waiting for me,” she says. She eventually realized that his personal values–such as humility, prudent spending and equality–were the foundation of his corporate philosophy.


    Soupata is less than a year away from the company’s retirement age of 55 for executives, and is not disclosing her plans. There is speculation that she may stay until the company celebrates its 100th anniversary in 2007.


    Meanwhile, the company continues to grow and break into new markets. Soupata says she loves the ride. For many years, the growth of UPS was slow. The company had to spread through the U.S. literally state by state, bound by federal regulations requiring the transportation company to get individual state approval to conduct business. Now, of course, its reach is global.


    Soupata recently visited employees in Japan. She watched a group of Japanese drivers in their trademark UPS brown uniforms line up next to what appeared to be freshly polished trucks. The workers went through a ritual recitation of safety practices familiar to every driver in the U.S., first in Japanese and then in English.


    “It was just amazing,” she says. “When our people are wearing browns, you don’t know what country you are in.”


    There was one problem, though: the first-name thing.


    “People are so respectful in Japan that using the first name is just not proper. I say, call me Lea, and they are really not sure if they are supposed to do that.”


    She assures them it’s not only OK, it goes with wearing a brown uniform.


Workforce Management, May 2005, pp. 38-44 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on May 10, 2005July 10, 2018

Packing In Customers

A funny thing happened on the way to a paperless society: The Internet, with its online auctions and e-retail shopping, has created a worldwide demand for shipping that is driving a nice international business for package delivery services.



    Four shippers alone–UPS, FedEx, DHL International and the U.S. Postal Service–divide more than $100 billion in revenue among them.


    These entities are putting so many uniformed employees on the ground, aircraft in the sky and trucks on the road that an international trade war over delivery services seems to have taken on the appearance of true battle.


    Competition among the major parcel handlers, who employ some of the largest workforces in the world, is frenzied. The big package delivery companies are swallowing up smaller companies and expanding into an array of logistical, supply-chain and other services.


    UPS not only moves cars but also sets up warehouses stocked with car parts to make overnight delivery to dealers easier. Instead of transporting lobsters from the Maine coast, UPS set up a lobster farm at its Louisville, Kentucky, hub for faster delivery to restaurants.


    With the exception of the government-run postal service, the delivery companies seem to be mimicking one another. It goes like this: When UPS buys Mail Boxes Etc., FedEx follows up and purchases Kinko’s. Needing an air force to counter its bigger competitors, DHL acquires Airborne Inc., then gets Danzas Air and Ocean from its German parent Deutsche Post World Net.


    Here is a breakdown of the four key players:


    UPS–Revenue in 2004: $36.6 billion. The Atlanta-based giant has 384,000 employees. It owns 268 jet aircraft and charters an additional 301 planes. Operates in more than 200 countries and dominates business in the U.S. Handles 14.1 million packages and documents a day, delivering to 7.9 million daily customers. Owns 88,000 cars, vans, tractor-trailers and motorcycles. Fighting to hold on to market share in the U.S. while it expands operations internationally.


    DHL International–Revenue in 2004: $32 billion. The one-time San Francisco-based company is now owned by Deutsche Post, which has a monopoly on Germany’s mail delivery. Most of its revenue is generated outside the U.S., but it is rapidly expanding and building up its name in the U.S., with a $1.2 billion investment plan. Has 170,000 employees worldwide. Operates a fleet of 420 aircraft. Deutsche Post says its U.S. operations are losing money but could break even by 2006.


    FedEx–Revenue in 2004: $24.7 billion. The Memphis, Tennessee-based company has 250,000 employees and contractors. Operates in more than 220 countries and territories. Has 671 aircraft and more than 71,000 motorized vehicles. Handles 6 million parcels daily. Has a big contract with the U.S. Postal Service. Is putting up a strong challenge to UPS in ground transportation.


    U.S. Postal Service–Revenue in 2004: $69 billion. Employs 707,000 career employees and 101,000 substitute, relief and replacement workers. Owns 212,000 motor vehicles but contracts with commercial air carriers. Most of its revenue derives from a monopoly on mail delivery in the U.S. Counting only priority and overnight mail and package delivery, the services that most frequently throw it into competition with private firms, USPS takes in $7.4 billion a year.


Workforce Management, May 2005, p. 43 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on May 6, 2005July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Do We Get New Managers to Document Performance

Dear Happy/Sad:



From your description, it appears that the former supervisors tolerated mediocre performance, while your new supervisors have higher standards. Now that the employees are back from leave, you must address the gap inperformance. That’s both good and bad news.

The bad news is that you cannot do much to make up for past performance, so you must look to the future to correct things. It could require a lot ofsupervisory stamina to straighten things out.

Nevertheless, take heart that your new supervisors are making high performance a priority and providing the leadership needed to make this happen. Working with employees who didn’t have to perform well in the past will test their motivation and abilities. Having new supervisors at the helm, though, will ease the transition for employees.

Help your new supervisors set clear expectations, establish performance measures and reward/recognize good performance. Establishing ground rules should help your supervisors motivate employees to perform at higher levels. Holding employees accountable while at the same time providing coaching, guidance andrecognition ought to improve the situation.

Remember to approach employees with confidence in their abilities and respect for their trustworthiness. If you expect employees to fail, they will. It also is possible that the employees did not get along with their former supervisor, causing their motivational levels to suffer. Give them the benefit of the doubt and focus on the positive. Provide as much praise as possible and address performance issues without delay.

What if employees don’t turn around their performance? With documented performance expectations and follow-up coaching, you are now on solid footing to implement progressive discipline if it is warranted. Hopefully, you won’t have to consider that.

SOURCE: Patsy Svare, managing director,The Chatfield Group, Glenview, Illinois, July 2, 2004.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress