Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on April 13, 2001June 29, 2023

Pros and Cons of ASPs

A Workforce Q&A with Mike Smith, vice president, business development, TALX Corporation, about the good and bad side of ASPs.

Workforce:
What is the current state of ASPs in the human resources arena?
Mike Smith:
ASP-based solutions actually complement HRMS-vendor-provided solutions.Today, all popular HRMS solutions provide standard application programminginterfaces (APIs) that make ASP integration a well-defined process. Inaddition, the employee portal trend is making integration simpler and offersemployees seamless access to a variety of services.
WF:
What are the pros and cons of blending conventional client-server softwareand ASP solutions?
MS:
The biggest advantage to integrating in-house systems with ASP software isthat the final solution is more robust and the total service offering ismuch richer. The blending of in-house and ASP-based solutions also offersthe advantage of bringing best-of-class services to employees. The biggestdisadvantage is the loss of control. That is why it is very important toselect an ASP that not only can provide the desired employee servicefunctions but also delivers a high level of service.
WF:
Which type of company benefits most from ASPs?
MS:
Traditionally, an ASP model has been most appealing to medium-sizeenterprises that simply cannot afford up-front software licensing costs, orthe infrastructure and ongoing maintenance costs required for enterprisebusiness applications. Now, with a multi-year ASP commitment, companies havepredictable ongoing costs. Even the larger companies with diverse employeepopulations can realize benefits by not staffing to handle peakemployee-centric events or supporting specialized employee servicestechnologies, such as IVR or speech recognition.
WF:
What are the most important issues to pay attention to when structuring adeal with an ASP?
MS:
Keyperformance measurements should include service availability, employeeutilization and acceptance, and consistency and reliability in dataexchange.

Workforce, February 2001, Vol80, No 2, p. 54  Subscribe Now!


Posted on April 13, 2001June 29, 2023

Understanding Service-Level Agreements

In the emerging digital economy, thecost of a technology failure can be enormous. And when an outside provider hostsan application or service, the complications can multiply. As a result,companies choosing an application service provider are increasingly taking aclose, hard look at the service-level agreement, also known as an SLA.


    Although the conceptis hardly new – for years organizations have created detailed SLAs fortelecommunications and consulting – the emergence of Web sites, intranets, andhosted software and services has clearly added a new wrinkle to the equation.


    “As a greaternumber of companies turn to outsourcing key systems and software, there’s agreater degree of risk,” notes Kneko Burney, director of e-businessinfrastructure and services at Cahners In-Stat Group, a Scottsdale, Arizona,market research and consulting firm. “If a service fails, it can provedevastating to the business. It can cost a company a lot of money and endangerthe relationship with business partners and customers.”


    The service-levelagreement can protect both sides in what is usually a complex business deal.“The reality is that there’s no such thing as 100 percent availabilitybecause no fail-safe system exists. But a company must know with a high degreeof certainty that it can conduct business online and that it isn’t going toincur constant interruptions or performance problems,” says Greg Blatnick,vice president at market research firm Zona Research, Redwood City, California.


    A September 2000survey conducted by Zona Research found that ASP service-level agreementstypically focus on guaranteed uptime, guaranteed bandwidth, guaranteedapplication performance, SLA indemnification, and interapplication communicationguarantees.


    A companycontracting with an outside provider must pay close attention to the details andintricacies of the business arrangement, says Burney. For example, what appearsto be a guarantee of 99.9 percent uptime might not be. “The provider mightguarantee that their service will be running 99.9 percent of the time, but ifthe backbone goes down or a company’s ISP fails, they might be off thehook.”


    According to Burney,it’s crucial to define terms and conditions up front. Using exact measures anddictating specific remedies and actions can prevent conflicts and confusionlater on. In most cases, the service provider should guarantee backboneperformance and bandwidth; if it experiences a problem, it should addressremediation with its own providers rather than leave a customer marooned.


    Most SLAs dictatethat the ASP, ISP, or hosting service cover only the direct costs associatedwith downtime or performance lags. A few offer escalating penalties that aretacked on to the credit for the monthly fee. Of course, all this necessitates asystem in place to actually measure performance.


    “At the end of theday, it’s the customer that feels the burden and who feels the pain if an ASPor other outsourced service fails to meet requirements,” says Dave Boulanger,service director for consulting firm AMR Research. Nevertheless, he believesthat organizations must understand their own needs and acknowledge thatoutsourcing technology really comes down to a partnership, where both companiesmust work together to solve problems. “It’s not as simple as a traditionaloutsourced agreement,” he notes. “There are many more variables and issuesto deal with.”


Workforce, February 2001, Vol80, No 2, p. 52  Subscribe Now!


Posted on April 13, 2001June 29, 2023

Excite@Home Goes the ASP Route

Few events can heap as much stress on acompany, and an HR department, as a merger. There are business issues to examineand cultural issues to sort through. And before the dust can settle and a newentity can take shape, there’s also the daunting task of connecting variousenterprise computing systems.


    When broadbandprovider @Home Corporation and Internet firm Excite joined forces in May 1999,corporate controller Robert Lerner immediately recognized that integratingtechnology was a top priority. And trying to tackle the task in-houserepresented a formidable, if notimpossible, challenge. A previous acquisition had resultedin integration obstacles.


    Financial systemscouldn’t handle the companies’ combined data.


    “We had apreconceived notion that an outsource option was a better match,” Lernerexplains. As a result, Excite@Home turned to Corio’s Intelligent Enterprise, asuite of solutions that includes financial management, distribution, and humanresources functions, all powered by PeopleSoft. The ASP approach provided a morescalable and flexible ERP solution than the company could build on its own.


    Excite@Homeevaluated various ERP applications and ASPs and found that Corio’s ASP hostingmodel would result in a more favorable total cost of ownership than itcould achieve by building a solution internally.


    “The cost of theCorio model was based on the number of users. Our old system was tied to arevenue-growth model,” says Lerner.


    Today, the firm,which saw its employee base triple in 1999 and early 2000, has become anInternet powerhouse. Says Lerner: “In terms of efficiency and scale, the [ASP]model made more sense.”


Workforce, February 2001, Vol80, No 2, p. 54  Subscribe Now!


Posted on April 13, 2001July 10, 2018

Employee Referral Programs for IT

Unifi Network, a division ofPricewaterhouse Coopers, conducted a study of employee referral programs amongthe IT functions of companies. The survey data below is effective May 2001.

Prevalenceof Employee Referral Programs
Eighty-eightorganizations (61.1%) indicated that they have a formal employee referralprogram.

 

Prevalenceof Employee Referral Plan Structure
Responses Percentof Responses
Company-wide employeereferral program 51 58.0%
–with separatebonus structure for IT 21 23.9%
IT-specific employeereferral program only

16

18.2

 

AverageReferral Bonus by Employee Group
Company-wide
TotalEnterprise
EmployeeGroup Responses 25th % 50th % Average 75th %
TopManagement 47 $500 $1,000 $1,405 $2,000
Mid-Management 47 $500 $1,000 $1,214 $2,000
Exempt 46 $500 $675 $993 $1,425
Non-Exempt 42 $500 $500 $652 $900
 
Company-wide/IT Bonus
IT-Specific
EmployeeGroup Responses 25th % 50th % Average 75th %
TopManagement 16 $1,375 $1,500 $2,031 $2,000
Mid-Management 16 $1,375 $1,500 $2,031 $2,000
Exempt 16 $1,000 $1,500 $1,838 $2,000
Non-Exempt 12 $500 $500 $879 $1,125
 
TotalEnterprise
EmployeeGroup Responses 25th % 50th % Average 75th %
TopManagement 16 $500 $900 $1,056 $1,000
Mid-Management 16 $500 $900 $1,056 $1,000
Exempt 16 $500 $750 $888 $1,000
Non-Exempt 12 $425 $500 $554 $688
 
IT-Specific
IT-Specific
EmployeeGroup Responses 25th % 50th % Average 75th %
TopManagement 14 $1,000 $1,500 $2,050 $3,000
Mid-Management 14 $1,000 $1,500 $2,505 $3,000
Exempt 14 $1,000 $1,350 $1,764 $2,750
Non-Exempt 11 $1,000 $1,200 $1,609 $2,000
Posted on April 13, 2001June 29, 2023

What to Ask an ASP About Security

Evaluating a potential ASP’s security takes time and expertise. The details of authentication, packet filtering, encryption, and other technologies call for investigation by specialists, either in-house IT analysts or outside security consultants. But here are some of the broad questions that management should be asking:


  • How does the ASP control physical access to its site?
  • Does the ASP have a disaster-control program that includes restoring data in the event of power loss or other emergency?
  • How are access rights controlled to ensure that only authorized personnel are dealing with the client’s data?
  • Does the ASP perform background checks on employees?
  • Are corporate-training programs in place to keep employees aware of the need for constant security monitoring?
  • How are passwords protected, and what kind of corporate policy governs their use?
  • Are authentication procedures — digital certificates, tokens, and biometric methods such as iris scanners or fingerprint identifiers — used to back up password control?
  • Who has the right to make changes to the servers used in handling the client’s data?
  • Does the ASP use encryption to protect data moving between the client and its site?
  • Is the ASP’s internal network protected by firewalls?
  • Are change procedures in place to lock down any access points that may have been opened up through new equipment or software, or changes to the existing firewalls?
  • What procedures ensure that the latest software patches are always installed to seal off vulnerabilities?
  • What measures are being taken to prevent virus and other malicious code from damaging the ASP’s systems?
  • Do the company’s audit logs demonstrate that the ASP is using its procedures in a correct and consistent way?


Posted on April 8, 2001June 29, 2023

Questions to Ask Vendors of Learning Management Software

When a company is considering the purchase of a learning management system,it is important to obtain as much information as possible from vendors to ensurethe correct product is selected. Such a purchase is generally a largeinvestment, with a long-term commitment, so you will want to know as much as youcan ahead of time.


The following is a list of questions provided by previous purchasers of suchprograms. These questions may complement your specific company-related questionsand make the selection process easier.

  1. Program development
  2. Content
  3. Upgrading
  4. Quality assurance
  5. Security
  6. Cost

Program development
Describe your company’s development methodology, including:

  • The educational theory behind the learning management system.

  • Your company’s history of past implementations, successful andunsuccessful.

  • Your developers’ plans for emerging technologies and a timeframe for whenthey are expected to be included in your product.

  • What distinguishes your offering from those of other companies in thismarket.

Content

Describe your approach to content, including:

  • How content is replicated.

  • Whether non-programmers can make changes to the content of the database.

  • Whether you support the ability to launch and track reusable learningobjects, or to assemble them into courses for specified training.

  • Whether Microsoft Office tools can be used to create content and learningprograms.

  • Whether and how date can be converted from an existing system.

Upgrading
Describe your company’s upgrade philosophy, including:

  • Whether there is easy integration with other systems.

  • The impact of upgrades on modifications to the system (e.g., if the systemis customized to accommodate specific business rules, are version upgradestransparent or does the customization have to be redone).

Quality Assurance

Describe your company’s approach to quality control, including:

  • Whether the application is scalable.

  • How you know your Web-based training solution is effective.

Security
Describe your company’s approach to security, including:

  • Whether sensitive personnel data can be secured.

  • Whether your system can support multiple browsers and security settings.

  • How much integration work is required to support your system.

  • The average time it should take to get started and any factors that mightinfluence timeframes.

Cost
Describe your company’s approach to costs, including:

  • Hosting and access costs, and costs of customization.

  • The total costs we can expect (for scheduling, training, etc.)

  • Audit trail functionality and electronic signature compliance.

  • Whether your provide for test runs (using the actual software with yourown database before buying).

  • The expected return on investment.

SOURCE: “Learning Management Systems 2001: How to Choose the RightSystem for Your Organization,” by Brandon Hall, Ph.D., Jan. 2001.


Posted on April 7, 2001July 10, 2018

HR Should Get a Clue Corporate Spying is Real

Have you ever wondered where all the Cold War spies went once the IronCurtain fell? Look no further than your own doorstep, because many spies are nowinvolved in corporate espionage. Adam Penenberg is the co-author of Spooked:Espionage in Corporate America (Perseus, 2000). We talked to him about the rolethat HR should play in keeping corporate secrets secret.

Corporate espionage is a relatively recent phenomenon, isn’t it?
Corporate espionage has been around forever. Now it’s just beenprofessionalized. In 1811 Francis Cabot Lowell traveled to England and rippedoff the plans for the Cartwright loom, which he memorized while touring afactory. With it, Lowell brought home the blueprints for America’s industrialrevolution.
 
What’s a more recent story of corporate espionage?
One of my favorite corporate spy stories occurred to my co-author, MarcBarry, who is a corporate spy. He was in a room in Silicon Valley meeting withthe inventor of a hot new technology, and there were five other “seedcapital investors” in the room asking questions about the technology andthe specs and everything else. And everyone in the room, Marc knew, was acorporate spy. They were all winking at each other.
 
How did a nice guy like you get started in corporate espionage?
I think that the espionage interest comes out of the hacking stories I didfor Forbes magazine and Forbes.com. I got into the idea of software piracy,music piracy on the Net, the special communities that have formed in cyberspacelike gangs, software gangs, and music-piracy gangs. They had a whole peckingorder. It was unbelievable. I became fascinated by hackers and the idea of theconcept of hacking being everywhere and no one being really aware of it. Thatkind of led me to corporate espionage — another area where it’s happening allthe time, yet people aren’t really aware of it.
 
What is the shortest speech you’d give to an HR person who doesn’t believethis is a problem for her company?
Well, a person or a company that takes that attitude I would call a victim.Odds are, if they have something worth stealing — whether it’s sales information, ormarketing information, or their budget, or new technologies — if they don’tthink it’s happening, they’re wrong. It is. Competitors may be looking at tryingto hire away whole sections of their company, or looking at their internaldecision making, or looking at their internal network. Just about every 500company is engaging in some sort of CI, or “competitive intelligence.”
 
How is competitive intelligence done?
Much of the time it is straightforward market research, done by professionallibrarian types, who dig up publicly available material like publications,market studies, etc. But sometimes companies hire people who break the law, orat least without breaking the law, work as spies. Many of them were trained bythe CIA and the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) and at the FBI. They’re formerthree-letter-agency people who are now working for companies. And what do theydo for companies but take the expertise, the skills, and the knowledge theylearned in their agencies and apply it to the private sector.
 
For example, sayI’m a mid-sized company in a field of very large companies that make sneakers. Ifind out that my competitor is about to do a massive national TV ad campaign fora new line of sneakers. Well, I was also planning on doing a national TV thing,but I realize, oh my god, I will get buried by them. So I’ve got to do adifferent strategy. That information may have prevented me from spending tens ofmillions of dollars on an ad campaign that wouldn’t work.
 
Are there any laws protecting companies from CI?
The Economic Espionage Act was passed by Congress in 1996, making it afederal crime to engage in economic espionage or stealing a trade secret. Atrade secret has to be defined, and you are the only one that can define it, youand your company. Now, for example, the formula for Coca-Cola is a trade secret.The source code for Microsoft is a trade secret. These are things that thecompanies go to great lengths to protect, and they’ve documented these steps,right? The information is only in the hands of a few people, and it can betracked, so that basically, you’ve done everything in your power to protect yourtrade secrets.
 
Doesn’t this solve the problem of corporate espionage?
No. Sales figures are not trade secrets. Factory production is not a tradesecret. The next advertising campaign that you’re going to run or inside scoopsor anything like that, everything, any piece of information like that, is not atrade secret. You have to define what your trade secrets are. CI involves, let’ssay, the acquisition of information that’s quite valuable to a competitor but isnot a trade secret.
 
Give me an example of how you can legally acquire valuable information abouta company.
Microsoft posts lists of every available job on its Web site. If you aretelling your competitors what jobs you’re looking to fill, that means they canfigure out what areas you’re looking to invest in R&D, and looking into newtechnologies and looking at areas you want to beef up. For example, if you had,all of a sudden, four new marketing jobs open, that could indicate that you’removing toward marketing some new product in a huge way, or you’re moving yourwhole marketing department in-house, perhaps. These are all pieces ofinformation that are valuable to know.
 
Take it a step further so that it’s not exactly illegal, but not exactlyethical, either.
I love this one. If you ever want to find disgruntled ex-employees of acompany who are specifically trained in a technology or skill that you want totarget as a journalist, or as a corporate spy, or as anyone who wants to findout, just type in the word “résumé,” the name of the company you’retargeting, and the technology you’re interested in. You get those three thingstogether in a search engine, and you’ll pull up a lot of résumés of people inthat area. It’s great to debrief them, because they love to dish about thecompany.
 
Can a company be protected from this sort of thing?
When you let people go, even if they are not taking information with themphysically, they are still taking information with them. You need to have youremployees sign non-disclosure agreements; that’s the first piece of advice Iwould give. That puts a legal sanction on them spilling information about thecompany for as long as you can make them do this. That’s how you can prevent alot of these problems. Also let people who work for you know that while you workfor this company, you are not allowed to spill this information over thetelephone. If someone calls you, you should patch this person over to thesecurity division, let’s say. There should be a structure and place for handlingrequests for information.
 
Is HR information that valuable?
Perhaps the information that is contained in the databases of an HRdepartment is not the kind of competitive intelligence that would give a rivalmuch of an advantage, okay? It may not even mean all that much to the peoplewithin the company if this information was breached. This is possible. Thequestion, though, is if you can breach this, then you can get in much deeper inthe company. So you have to be as responsible as the next person in making surethat you are not the hole that leaks the information from the company.
 
So numberone, it isn’t enough to say, “Oh, well, our information isn’t valuableenough to steal.” You still have a responsibility. Number two, I wouldargue that salary structure could be used by a competitor in a reallyinteresting way. I know of someone hired by a competitor to scope out a wholedivision of people at a Wall Street company. It was a major bank. They were ahotshot division that was really making money for the bank. There were about 30brokers or traders. So the spy was able to get a whole list of their names andtheir salaries, and then the competitor tried to hire the whole group away.
 
How is corporate espionage changing?
It’s been around a long time. What’s new about it is that you’re gettingprofessionals involved now. Guy Dubois, who was at the CIA for many, many yearsand now works in the private sector, told me, “Look, in the CIA, agents dowhatever they need to do to get the job done.” He just kind of says to me,”There are no limits to what an agent will do.” Now you have thesesame people who were trained by this organization engaged in competitiveintelligence. Are you telling me that they are not using the skills they learnedin the CIA? I would tell you that you’re crazy.

Workforce, April 2001, pp. 72-75SubscribeNow!

Posted on April 6, 2001

Discovering Relocation Home Loans

Discovering Relocation Home Loans

Posted on April 5, 2001July 10, 2018

Uncertainty is the Guiding Light for 2001

It is our view that 2001 will be a “watershed” year for pay andrewards. Companies will have a host of critical decisions to make — all of themwill be important and all of them will be challenging. A few words may bringsome of the issues into clearer focus:

  1. Companies are transitioning from one of the longest periods of economicgrowth to a time of uncertainty. For the last few years “everything”we did relative to pay and rewards seemed to “work.” Now we will seethe need for a powerful business case for everything we do. It must add value tothe business — good news for a change.

  2. We are going from a time when companies we may have been “tossingmoney” at scarce talent — inflating base pay, granting equity, andcreating “new entitlements.” Now we have an environment where we arelaying off talent in one part of the enterprise and scratching to attract andretain it elsewhere. No more “one size fits all” reward solutionsgoing forward; internal equity has been redefined.

  3. Hiring is changing — from recruitment that placed a premium on all skillsto a situation where hiring is more selective. Companies that couldn’t build aperformance culture employment model before have another shot now. Rather thanjust designing rewards to get and keep everyone, now we need to emphasizerewards that are attractive to people who want to add value. Some companies willmiss this second chance again.

  4. Companies are offering incentives and equity lower in the workforce ranksthan ever before. Because business times were good, nearly any incentive planpaid off. Also every share of stock became more valuable. This has stopped. Itis important now to link rewards to what drives business — a chance to userewards as the accelerator pedal that makes the company go again.

  5. We now know that stock options are not the “secret sauce” offinancial rewards. This gives us an opportunity to re-start our equity-sharingstrategies. Hopefully these new strategies will include communication andeducation so people know that company stock can go up and down — and in afairly short time period.

  6. Employees have gained the “upper hand” because they have accessto more competitive compensation data on the Internet than ever before.Companies need to train their managers to deal with a workforce that is more”pay and reward savvy” — call it “re-arming managers with theinformation they need to do their jobs.”

  7. Companies did not need to follow the basic rules of reward design –everything “paid off.” We will now see a return to good and basicblocking-and-tackling design. The elements include workforce involvement,alignment with business metrics, win-win for company and people, and simplicity.

  8. Our pay and rewards were designed for a business environment where wecould pass all our people costs on to customers. So we just continued to pilemore costly answers on the fire. Now we may have a reward solution that isfocused on keeping people — all people regardless of value-added. It is time toconsider pay and reward solutions that are more cost justified based oncontribution to the business.

  9. We grew to realize that people work for more than pay — at least the onesyou want to keep, anyway. Total rewards in the form of providing a compellingfuture that people you need find attractive; individual growth so peoplecontinue to add value and adapt as they grow in economic value; a positiveworkplace where people want to do well; and lastly total pay comprised of basepay, incentives, recognition and celebration, and benefits.

WorkforcePay and Rewards:
Compare 2000/Start of2001

2000

Start of 2001

Business very strong Business extremely mixed
All talent was scarce Some talent scarce, some not
Hiring full speed ahead Layoffs and selective hiring
Continue move to broad-based incentives Incentives not paying off
Options viewed as “the answer” Options “underwater”
E-pay gives workforce “data” E-pay still going strong
Everything worked Some solutions struggling
Adding pay was the solution Stronger alignment of pay with performance results necessary
Total rewards on radar Continue focus on total rewards
Posted on April 1, 2001July 10, 2018

B of A and Big-Time Outsourcing

The controversial “O” word is rearing its ugly head: outsourcing.In some quarters, the concept arouses feelings of insecurity and dread. Inothers, it’s perceived as a boon to the HR industry, the greatest thing that’scome along since recruitment went online.


    Last fall, Bank of America, the nation’s largest bank, valued at more than$672 billion, signed a 10-year contract with two-year-old Exult, Inc., to managea large chunk of the bank’s human resource functions. Exult is a provider ofWeb-enabled, integrated HR services. Both players have termed the November 2000deal a “strategic alliance,” practically forbidding the use of theinflammatory “O” word.


    “It’s inevitable that this will be the trend,” says Ed Rankin, CEOof People Solutions, Inc., a human capital management company in Irving, Texas.”If you are a CEO and can get better, more flexible service at lower cost,you’re going to go there.


    “I think people get confused about outsourcing HR. Often they think itmeans there’s no one left who cares about the employees. But that’s not thecase. It simply leaves HR people inside the business free to work on strategyand vision and focus on things that truly add value.”


    Mike Salvino, the account executive with Exult who’s handling the deal, says,”The ‘O’ word isn’t a good description of all the work that’s gone intothis alliance. This is not traditional outsourcing.”


    The two companies are determined to control the public perception of thearrangement. But many in the outsourcing industry say it’s really more a matterof simple semantics. “They are dipping their foot into the watercautiously,” says Carlos Rodriguez, president of HR outsourcer ADPTotalSource. “I mean, what do Ryder and EDS tell people when IT functionsare taken over? Is it outsourcing? Yes. Calling it an alliance makes people feelbetter.”


    Yet there are some key differences between the Bank of America/Exultarrangement and traditional outsourcing. For one, a joint Web portal will allowboth companies to sell their products and services online. Another is that Bankof America received warrants for millions of dollars’ worth of Exult stock.Among the functions that are being outsourced are payroll, accounts payable,benefits, human resources, information technology, and service delivery –including the call center for human resource and employee benefitsinformation. The bank will still handle design, strategy, policy making, andcompliance.


    Chris Blum, an analyst with the investment banking firm Edward Jones in St.Louis, says the new relationship between the two companies suggests apartnership, not simply outsourcing. “Of course, you can break thatpartnership down into its various pieces. One large component is Bank ofAmerica’s outsourcing of its HR functions.”


    Although 675 former Bank of America personnel will move to Exult, anestimated 1,300 more will stay at the bank. “That includes staffing,recruiting, compensation, advice, and counsel,” Salvino says. “Theblack-and-white stuff will come to Exult; the interpretive stuff, the gray area,will remain with the bank.”


    But even administrative functions aren’t often outsourced by companies aslarge as Bank of America, says Irving Miller, a shareholder who specializes inlabor and employment law with Akerman Senterfitt in Miami. Miller says he thinksthat for large corporations, allowing someone else to come in and handle HRfunctions would be a disaster. “I represent or have represented 1,000 to2,000 large companies, and they wouldn’t dare outsource HR. It’s too crucial. Anoutside company isn’t going to have its finger on the pulse of a largecorporation like those inside it.”


    Mary Lou Cagle, business transformation and benefits executive with Bank ofAmerica, says the bank had good reasons for its decision. She says Bank ofAmerica took a look at itself and decided that some transactional businesseslike payroll and human resources were not a part of the bank’s core business,which is “taking care of customers.” About the same time thisassessment was taking place, Bob Gunn, a senior member of the Exult team andsomeone who had a previous relationship with the bank, approached Bank ofAmerica about using Exult’s services.


    “Bob’s idea was centered around what we think is going to be the wave ofthe future: business process outsourcing that is a creative alliance. Bob cameto the bank with a bunch of ideas, and Mary Lou and I took those ideas andcrafted this,” Salvino says of the deal.


    Gunn’s timing and ideas may have been right on, but Exult itself was astart-up, barely a year old. Cagle says the bank was concerned about that.”We went through the due-diligence process and saw Exult had a veryhigh-quality, long-term venture capital partner [General AtlanticPartners].”


    The alliance is expected to save the bank 10 percent annually on HR spending.


    Exult is hoping to generate revenues of about $1.1 billion over the life ofits 10-year contract.


    The agreement is a boon to Exult in other ways, too. Bank of America allowedExult to take over its Charlotte, North Carolina, service center, which handlesaccounting and HR processes, many of the same functions that will be assumed byExult. The center will be expanded and refurbished, but the infrastructure andstaff are already in place. In return, Bank of America received warrants forExult stock worth about $50 million.


    Bank of America isn’t the first Exult client to include equity as part of itsdeal. British Petroleum — formerly BP Amoco — and Unisys are both major investors,says Mark Hodges, Exult’s vice president of strategy and marketing. Although BPwas the first large corporate account the company signed — in a seven-year, $600million contract — the Bank of America deal is by far Exult’s largest.


    Bank of America and Exult will become Web portal partners, and bank employeescan use the portal to handle a number of different human resource functions suchas viewing a pay stub online or making changes in deductions or benefitcoverage.


    Salvino says the bank already had solid services built around its callcenter. The challenge now, he says, is to teach 150,000 Bank of Americaemployees to deal with those same activities online, by themselves. “We’llstill have the 1-800 number and call center staff, but over the course of time,we want to fully implement the portal.” More than just providingWeb-enabled HR, Salvino and Cagle say, it will also be a source of revenue forboth companies.


    Down the line, Bank of America is hoping to take internaldepartments — such asaccounting and payroll — and use them as a source of revenue, farming out thoseservices to businesses other than the bank. “Right now, our accountspayable department does accounting work only for the bank, but in time theycould conceivably take on other clients,” Cagle says.


    Through Exult’s portal, Bank of America will become the preferred provider offinancial services and banking products to employees of other Exult clients. AndBank of America will push Exult’s services, hoping that it will benefit bothcompanies.


    Analyst Chris Blum says it wouldn’t surprise him if more large companiesbegan forming alliances in this way. “It’s a smart idea. Because they willhave a stake in Exult, Bank of America can help Exult by recommending them toits business customers. Ultimately there may be some benefit to Bank of Americafinancially if Exult does well. And because the bank will be a significant Exultcustomer, Exult will probably dedicate a portion of its workforce to servicingBank of America.”


    Exult’s Salvino admits that, although outsourcing is a very large component,the deal’s other elements make this more than an HR outsourcing arrangement.People Solutions CEO Ed Rankin calls Exult “the poster child for theoutsourcing industry. Our firm is like a baby Exult,” he says. “Ithink this deal is the beginning of a trend, where corporations choose not tomanage some of their own human resource functions.” Rankin says thatbecause the model for outsourcing is still being defined, he disagrees that therelationship between Bank of America and Exult isn’t outsourcing.


    Today, clients hire People Solutions to take over some –but not all — of thepieces of their HR functions. The most common parts outsourced are those relatedto candidate tracking, transactional issues, staffing, and recruitment. Rankinsays the economic fundamentals of this kind of partnership are too compelling todismiss. “I don’t think the market really knows what outsourcing is yet. Alot of issues need to be resolved and if you look at how a company like EDS orother IT outsourcers work, there is still a great deal of case-by-case,situational services and contract construction. One-size-fits-all doesn’t workany longer.”


Workforce, April 2001, pp. 51-54SubscribeNow!

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress