Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on March 2, 2001July 10, 2018

“Ticket to Work” to Open New Job Opportunities

Imagine employees who provide their ownhealth benefits, their own assistance program and pay up to $5,900 of their ownfirst-year salary through two tax incentives. That’s the federal Ticket to Workand Self-Sufficiency Program.


    Ticket is in thefirst year of a three-year rollout and takes advantage of several pre-existingprograms.


    EmployedSupplemental Security Income (SSI) beneficiaries can get extended Medicaidhealth benefits or use Medicaid “buy-in” programs in some states.Employed Social Security Disability Income (SSDI) beneficiaries can get extendedMedicare health benefits. Companies that employ SSI or SSDI beneficiaries mayqualify for tax credits (see below).


    Social Securitydisability beneficiaries already are using these and other program supports toseek employment or keep working. Approximately 276,000 SSI recipients wereworking in December 2000, and 55,000 to 60,000 SSDI beneficiaries enter theworkforce annually, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA). Thosenumbers could increase substantially.


    Ticket is alsocreating an enlarged public/private employment network, including vocationalrehabilitation services. In 2001, Ticket is scheduled to roll out its fullprogram in 13 states: New York, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Wisconsin,Arizona, Colorado, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Iowa, Delaware and Vermont.


    Approximately 2.2million SSA disability beneficiaries in these states will receive Tickets toaccess this expanded employment support network. In other states, the existingstate vocational rehabilitation programs and other support services could bebusier as Ticket gets media coverage.


    By 2004, when Ticketemployment networks are rolled out nationwide, the SSA estimates 138,000 peoplewill be using the program.


For more information:

  • Maximus, under contract to SSA toadminister Ticket programs, toll free at 866/968-7842.

  • SocialSecurity Administration, including SSATicket contacts.

  • IRS,800/829-1040, dial 2, 1, wait, 5, 4, and ask for the Work Opportunity TaxCredit and Welfare to Work Tax Credit then leave a message for a returncall. Publication 954 describes these credits, but is not updated to includeTicket.

Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

Financial Strategies for Bal Seal Engineering

Following are five financial impactstrategies used at Workforce Optimas Award winner Bal Seal.

  1. Design your compensation andbenefits system to be competitive yet cost-effective. Simple to administer,simple for the employee to understand, based on the 60th percentile for yourindustry in your demographic area – these are the usual criteria. However, takeit one step further. Does your system have a variable pay component thatencourages all employees to share in the risk and rewards the companyexperiences? Do your financial and non-financial incentives producecost-effective behaviors? Does the system help create an environment conduciveto employee choices that align their desires, expectations, and goals with thecompany’s?


    Your compensation and benefits systemcan have a direct affect on production – motivated employees are productiveemployees – and at the same time balance recruiting and retention needs withminimizing response to the labor market. Pay employees well, but wisely, and notanymore than market realities require.

  2. Coordinate benefits to achieve costsavings. For example, a well-designed 401(k) program can produce sufficient taxsavings for the company so that administration costs for an equally welldesigned Section 125 plan will be more than covered. Usually this also means thehourly employee experiences sufficient tax savings in order to meet minimum401(k) contribution requirements without seeing a change in their take-home pay.The company wins and the employee wins.

  3. Develop the metrics appropriate inyour business for measuring the key human resource indicators on at least amonthly basis. Use these tools to monitor such trends as labor costs, overtime,turnover, headcount, and employee relations. Compare these trends with trends innet profit, bookings, sales, or other appropriate indicators. Understand theoperation of your business well enough to pick trigger points. When the trendsapproach a trigger point, take action. With a little practice and intuition youcan begin to forecast labor issues, avoiding unnecessary overtime, layoffs,turnover, and training.

  4. Monitor incentive programs,including commission and bonus program performance, recognition and suggestionprogram performance, and performance or merit program performance. Don’t assumebecause you have these programs that they are actually making a difference.Statistically compare human resource and production trends with incentiveprogram trends to determine the relationship, if any. If a contribution to thebottom line can’t be determined, change your measurement criteria. If you arerewarding people with dollars for additional dollars the company produces, therewill be a contribution you can identify that is attributable to the incentiveprogram.

  5. Measure the specific impact oftraining in improved bottom-line results. If training is not producing theresults you want, adjust the training until it does. This is a specificapplication of the metrics developed in number three above and the process ofstatistical validation developed in number four above.

Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

Manufacturing Finds Defined Contribution Plans Work Best

Competition in today’s tight labor market has forced even small companies to realize that pension and retirement benefits make a difference to employees. These benefits can be a tool to attract and retain talent, a way to compensate employees for gambling on a start-up, or just plain good sense from an employee-relations point of view.


    Jobs today are not about lifetime employment. The 21st-century workforce is transient. Most people will have more than half a dozen jobs in a lifetime. Employees like portability and practicality in retirement benefits. They are demanding and getting more choices, visible cash benefits plans, self-service participation, and access to and self-direction of investments.


    Traditionally, most companies offered defined benefit plans, which favor long-term employees. An employee works for the same company for 30-odd years, retires, then receives a monthly pension check based on a predetermined formula. That works well for people who have the same employer for life, but not so well for a mobile workforce. Termination well before retirement offers few, if any, benefits.


    Instead, there has been a shift by employers of all sizes to defined contribution plans or hybrids of defined benefit plans that offer employees more visible value, says Steve Vernon, vice president and consulting actuary for Watson Wyatt Worldwide in Los Angeles. Defined contribution plans are individual retirement accounts based on amounts contributed or allocated, like a 401(k). Matching funds are optional.


    From an employer’s point of view, these defined contribution plans can be less costly and transfer the risk and responsibility to the employee, says Craig Copeland, senior research associate with Employment Benefit Research Institute, a Washington-based nonprofit group.


    They are especially popular with small- and medium-size employers because they aren’t as complex from a regulatory standpoint and don’t require costly actuarial evaluations, adds Anna M. Rappaport, a Chicago-based principal with William M. Mercer Inc., worldwide benefits consultants.


    Here’s a look at how three companies, each involved in manufacturing of various kinds, are coping with changing workforce demographics and the retirement issue.


Workforce, March 2001, pp. 66-75 Subscribe Now!

Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

Eight Values Bring Unity to a Worldwide Company

Shortly after taking the helm of General Semiconductor, Ronald Ostertag discovered just how much work he had ahead of him when two senior managers began bickering during a presentation before his board of directors.


    Not ten minutes after he asked his team to show a united front, the pair traded insults and verbal barbs with no concern for who they were embarrassing.


    “It was then I realized that not only were people at the very top of the company going in different directions, they were not listening to each other or respecting what others had to say,” says Ostertag, recalling the events of a decade ago.


    Ostertag did what he had to do. He replaced nearly every member of his senior team. “But that quickly manifested itself in job insecurity further down the ranks, and I realized we needed to do something to develop a sense of teamwork,” he says. “We needed a mission statement and we needed to develop a culture of mutual respect that fostered cooperation and innovation.”


    This was particularly important because, as a global company, General Semiconductor had a workforce that was spread from North America to Asia and involved employees who spoke five languages. With only 200 workers located inside the United States, Ostertag had to find a formula that worked across cultures and job classifications.


    Headquartered in a modest office building in an industrial park on Long Island, New York, General Semiconductor makes power management components for the high-tech industry.


    From its manufacturing centers in Europe, Taiwan, Ireland, the United States, and China, the company makes the tiny transistors, diodes, and rectifiers that control the electronic impulses that power everything from automobiles and cell phones to dishwashers and personal computers.


    General Semiconductor turns out over 17 million of these minute parts a day, each wholesaling for well under a dollar. Customers include all the major electronics manufacturers, among them Phillips, Sony, and Delta.


    Originally a division of General Instrument, General Semiconductor is an independent entity employing 5,600, with revenues approaching $500 million.


    Looking back, Ostertag says he brought his new team together at a brainstorming session to come up with the company’s core principles.


    “From the get-go, this company was a cash producer, a profit center for General Instrument, so in general terms, the company was in good shape,” Ostertag says. “But if we wanted to grow, I realized, our task was to put down on paper what our core values were and then make sure everyone was on the same page.”


    From around the table came words like “quality” and “integrity” and phrases like “good customer service” and “on-time delivery.” From that starting point came a cohesive mission statement and a list of eight company values, what Ostertag now refers to as General Semiconductor’s “culture points.”


    “The work was sound because we haven’t changed them since they were created.”The next challenge was to spread the word throughout the company. Thus was born People Plus, an in-house leadership and problem-solving program developed by the company’s HR staff of six that uses the company’s mission and values as a starting point for individual growth.


    “We’re quite serious when we talk about leadership even to a bench worker on the assembly line,” says Gary Barello, a human resources staffer. “Lots of people will say, ‘Oh, I’m not a leader,’ but when we point out that the essence of leadership is influence, they realize everyone has leadership qualities and responsibilities.”


    The company instituted a program called People Plus that involves a conventional 360-degree review of each employee using a comprehensive self-assessment matched with feedback from supervisors, managers, peers, and subordinates chosen by the employee. But it includes a twist. Once the written evaluations are completed, each staffer, from Ostertag down, meets privately with an outside psychologist to discuss what the reports said and what behavioral adjustments the staffer might consider.


    Ostertag says that People Plus focuses on bringing out the unique talents and contributions of every employee and helping to blend them with those of others on the work team.


    The results were immediately measurable. Two years after the program was implemented, another survey of the 145-member worldwide senior management group indicated that out of 39 development areas, 36 showed improvement.


    “It is great to know how other people see you, because each of us does things that might be bothering others without our knowing it,” says Selena Chai-lin Wang, a manager of information systems applications. Wang can vouch for the program’s cross-cultural utility. A native of Taiwan, she began her career at General Semiconductor in 1989 as an industrial engineer in Taipei. She now works out of the company’s main office in Melville, New York.


    Applications engineer Neven Soric says that People Plus has helped bring the company together despite its far-flung locations. “It is good to know that everyone has done this program, especially since it is presented as providing constructive criticism,” he says. “It provides continuity from the top down.”


    Employees from the newest shop worker to a number-cruncher in corporate know that Ostertag takes his culture points seriously. “In fact, it wasn’t long after we put them in place that someone printed up a credit card version,” he says. “They knew when they saw me coming, whether it was in the factory in Taiwan or Ireland or here, that I might come up to anyone and ask them to rattle off four or five of those values. I didn’t mean it as a test, but more to show that that is what everyone here is striving for.”


    Five years after People Plus was in place, it gave birth to a sister training program, the Employee Development and Certification Program, also devised by the company’s own in-house HR staff.


    “As I traveled around the company, especially during the time we were preparing to go it on our own, I was getting some very basic questions from our workers,” Ostertag says. “I really believe that empowering employees is the key to any company’s success, but you can’t do that unless everyone is working from the same knowledge base.” So he set his HR staff to the task of finding out what employees wanted to know about the company.


    “No question was off-base; we took everyone seriously,” says Barello, the project’s manager. Once he had the questions in hand, he then assembled a group of “subject matter experts” to answer them.


    What HR eventually produced was a 135-page standard three-ring binder of information that includes everything from a list of the company’s board of directors and history to a description of products, customers, and competitors to basic financials.


    Ostertag credits the attention to staff interaction and cooperation with helping the company to nearly double revenues since 1996 and achieve greater market share.


    “From our perspective in HR, these programs have translated into a very stable workforce with little turnover, whether we are talking about our manufacturing plant in Ireland or in Europe,” HR director Linda Perry says. The average length of service among the six-member human resources team is 13 and a half years. For the technical marketing support group, staff longevity is about 12 years, 9 months.


    Ostertag says that revenues have grown from $361.9 million in 1996 to nearly $500 million for 2000. Employment has grown during the same period by 2,400. Of the company’s many successes, General Semiconductor prides itself most “on having the most knowledgeable and well-trained employees in the industry.”


Workforce, March 2001, pp. 44-45 Subscribe Now!


Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

Table of Contents March 2001

F

eatures


2001 Optimas Awards
The 10 companies we salute this year are among the finest in an evolving HR world. They are examples that help to inspire, inform, and illuminate with practices that bring business results.
By Janet Wiscombe
 
General Excellence:
The Container Store
A company that thinks out side the box is bringing a fresh point of view to HR.
By Jennifer Koch Laabs
 
Competitive Advantage:
Quebecor World
Training was the key to a new level of customer service at the world’s largest printing company.
By Jennifer Koch Laabs
 
Financial Impact:
Bal Seal Engineering
By tracking trends and cutting costs, HR became a profit center.
By Carroll Lachnit
 
Global Outlook:
General Semiconductor
A worldwide company bonded its global workforce with “culture points” and counseling.
By Caroline Louise Cole
 
Innovation:
Fleishman-Hillard
HR scouts at this public relations company recruit, develop, and retain top talent.
By Brenda Paik Sunoo
 
Managing Change:
The Men’s Wearhouse
A clothing store that puts employees first is tailored for any change the harsh retail environment might bring.
By Victor D. Infante
 
Partnership:
DaimlerChrysler
Labor and management build a prescripition for health, and create a program that pays for itself.
By Jennifer Hutchins
 
Quality of Life:
First USA Bank
The Opportunity Knocks program helps employees zero in on their career dreams and achieve them.
By Patrick J. Kiger
 
Service:
New York State Dept. of Civil Service
Government does work. This agency used private-sector practices to transform a huge, troubled bureaucracy.
By Jennifer Hutchins
 
Vision:
Synygy
A system of quarterly evaluations encourages open communication and growth.
By Jennifer Hutchins
 

Departments


Between the Lines
It takes research, review, and mass quantities of Chinese chicken salad to choose the winners of the 2001 Optimas Awards.
 
Mailbox
When e-learning works. • Making meetings start on time.
 
Dear Workforce:
Having fun – in a serious way. • Severance standards. • Is there a payroll pecking order?
 
On the Contrary
How does a new hairdo make the world a better place? Shari Caudron finds it’s all about the attitude you project.
 
The Buzz
Making layoffs your last resort. • A new generation: How to recruit the best and the youngest. • The future of minimum wage. • A look at what’s new in telecommuting.
 
S•M•L
A primer on pension and recruitment benefits. Whatever the size of your company, the options are vast.
 
Legal Insight
Sweeping OSHA ergonomics standards. • Should employees see their performance evaluations? • Racial barbs fly.
 
Think Twice
HR people wear a lot of hats, and Todd Raphael invites President George W. Bush to walk a mile in their boots.
Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

World Class Results on a Mom-and-Pop Budget

On its 40th anniversary three years ago, Bal Seal Engineering and its employees could look back at its history with pride. Founder Pete Balsells had propelled the company from a one-man operation in his garage to a larger facility in a Quonset hut to a $17 million manufacturing company that employed just under 200 people.


    But Bal Seal’s past didn’t provide a blueprint for the future envisioned by Balsells’s son, Peter, who became the company’s president in 1998. His goal: to make Bal Seal a $500 million industry leader by 2020. The company researches and develops unique seals for customers whose products range from pacemakers and jet engines to cappuccino makers and hazardous-waste pipelines.


    It was clear to the younger Balsells that the company wasn’t going to get there by following its old business plan. Its Santa Ana, California, plant was old. Its employees, mostly minimum-wage workers who lived within walking distance of their jobs, didn’t have the technical sophistication that would be necessary for the Bal Seal of the future. The company needed a new culture to match the mission and the values that Peter Balsells had set for it.


    Bal Seal’s HR department was ill-equipped to build that culture. Well into the 1990s, it continued to be a department that carried out just the basic personnel-administration functions. “It was basically time and attendance, corrective actions, hiring and firing,” says Jacques Barralon, now director of HR, who began with Bal Seal in 1982. Barralon couldn’t even give HR his full attention-his other job was conducting inspections and quality assurance.


    Putting Bal Seal on the right course took the work of everyone, from the CEO and founder to the machinist on the shop floor. To accomplish that, HR was re-created as a full-fledged organizational development department in 1998.


    Its mission was particularly challenging, recalls Jeff Jernigan, hired that year as VP of human resources. HR was responsible for seeing to it that the company did not lose employees during the move to a new facility in Foothill Ranch, about 20 miles south of Santa Ana. It would be expensive to replace employees who had a wealth of knowledge and expertise.


    HR was charged with hiring and training new and old employees to be more versatile and more technically skilled. It set about creating a new compensation system. And with the rest of the management team, it had a mission to keep the best of the old Bal Seal Engineering while creating a new company culture.


    Now, nearly two years later, Jernigan says they’re meeting the challenge. Bal Seal is in its new plant. It is a $22 million company, realizing 25 percent annual growth, and is on track to meet its 2020 goal. Still, as Jernigan points out, “It’s a long way off, and we’re just getting started.”


    No one quit during the move, although the company dismissed 41 “never changers,” who couldn’t make the switch to the new way of doing things. As the workers made the transition to new jobs, the firm provided severance, retraining if needed, résumé assistance, and other support.


    HR overhauled compensation and benefits: beginning employees are no longer minimum wage workers. They start work at 50 to 75 cents above the California $6.25 per hour minimum, and it’s possible for lower-paid workers who hit their training and other goals, including team and individual bonuses, incentive program goals, and suggestion program awards, to earn double the hiring wage within a year. Training has become a cornerstone of the company.


    But even with all of those advances, HR is anything but a source of vast new spending. Jernigan says it actually has become a profit center (and not by outsourcing its services, either).


    At Bal Seal, human resources:

  • Created a 401(k) and a Section 125 plan (a “cafeteria” benefits program) simultaneously. The tax savings generated for Bal Seal by the 401(k) covered the cost of the Section 125 plan. The Section 125 plan’s tax savings meant that for most employees, the minimum contribution for the 401(k) was covered. Participation was at 61 percent after enrollment.

  • Developed “leading indicators” to monitor and forecast labor requirements, overtime, turnover, and the impact of training on the bottom line.

  • Instituted a cross-training program that makes the Bal Seal workforce adaptable for various tasks at very short notice.

  • Achieved a one-time $250,000 savings by reconfiguring working schedules, reviewing and revising exempt/non-exempt categories, and taking other steps as outlined in Eliyahu M. Goldratt’s “Theory of Constraints,” a philosophy and methodology used to improve the running of an organization. Bal Seal continues to achieve annual operational savings.

  • Implemented new HRIS, payroll, and timekeeping systems. The workforce has grown 40 percent since 1998. With the new technology systems, no new HR personnel have had to be added.

  • Annually renegotiates preferred provider agreements with major employment agencies. In the first year, the company saved $56,000 in recruiting costs. It has achieved smaller such savings every year.

  • Designed new vacation and paid sick-leave policies that increased employee benefits while reducing vacation payouts by up to $185,000 a year.

    In 1999, Bal Seal won the Best Practices award from the Employers Group for HR programs that contribute to business. It won the 1998 Arthur Andersen Vision award for financial reporting. The company also was featured on the MSNBC Champions of Industry program for its innovations. Jernigan is at work on two books about how Bal Seal has remade itself.


    Now at home in a sleek industrial building, Bal Seal might best be described as streamlined. There is no executive wing. No one has secretaries or assistants; everyone, including the management team, handles his or her own paperwork, Jernigan says.


    The management team also is cross-trained so that each one knows the others’ areas. If one member of the team is gone, the others have the authority to OK decisions. For efficiency and as an “ego check,” the management team also is cross-trained for various jobs. Jernigan can run the switchboard. Peter Balsells has worked as the janitor, and was doing that job one day when an employment recruiter came by to visit. She thought she was being unpleasantly tricked when the guy in jeans with a push broom was introduced as Bal Seal’s president.


    About 60 percent of the workers are primarily Spanish-speakers, so Bal Seal has instituted a company-wide language-training program. English speakers learn Spanish. Spanish speakers learn English – all paid for by the company, on company time. Because Bal Seal serves customers worldwide, managers like Jernigan are expected to be working on proficiency in three languages.


    “We want every supervisor to recognize that every employee has equal value, but [serve] different roles,” he says. “We’re in this thing together, and to do that, to have that kind of culture, you have to speak the same language.”


    In many ways, the other language of Bal Seal is numbers, as expressed in charts that show the rise and fall of the leading indicators that HR tracks with almost religious fervor. Jernigan speaks with ease of linear regression and correlation analysis. One wall of the HR office at Bal Seal is lined with the leading indicator charts that Barralon creates.


    “We monitor a combination of factors – sales, overtime, labor, bookings, and net profit – and we look for certain statistical relationships that indicate when it’s appropriate to add more labor in advance of the need,” Jernigan says.


    “It also tells us when labor is increasing unnecessarily, and we either need to slow down hiring or not work overtime. That has allowed us to avoid layoffs in the last three years. It has allowed us to anticipate unnecessary overtime to the point where we don’t find ourselves looking over the last quarter and saying, ‘We spent $93,000 in overtime we didn’t need to.’ We can identify that trend before it happens and avoid making that expenditure.”


    The same statistical rigor is applied to training programs, where, for instance, the effect of sales training is correlated to its impact in bookings. The company saw that instruction on initiating a client relationship was working well. The lessons on closing the deal weren’t as successful. “If the training is not adding money to the bottom line as revenue, we change it or drop it,” he says.


    While Bal Seal is proud of what it has done – Jernigan calls it “world-class results on a mom-and-pop budget” – he’s quick to dispel the idea that Bal Seal’s achievements can’t be accomplished by other HR departments, and hopes the books he’s working on can help. “It’s not rocket science,” he says.


Workforce, March 2001, pp. 42-43 Subscribe Now!

Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

Thinking Outside the Box at The Container Store

The Container Stores are palaces of boxes and bags, racks and shelves that help you organize and store everything from shoes to spices. “Contain Yourself,” the company playfully entreats customers. But to its valued employees the mantra is quite the opposite: Think outside the box. The expression may be a maddening misnomer at many work places. At the Container Store, it’s real.


    The company has become so respected for its commitment to employees and their creative input that it has catapulted itself into a position of leadership in the HR field. The reason is simple. “A funny thing happens when you take the time to educate your employees, pay them well and treat them as equals,” company president and CEO Kip Tindell declares. “You end up with extremely motivated and enthusiastic people.”


    Sitting and talking with Beth Barrett, vice president of operations at the company’s Dallas headquarters, you quickly realize that the company isn’t like most old-economy retailers. And Barrett definitely isn’t a conventional head of human resources. Much about the organization and how it handles people management is unusual, but well suited to the company’s unique business mission: To sell products that save customers space and time.


    Just as no organizational product solution is ever the same for two different customers, The Container Store believes that people management should be the same way. Rather than filling positions as quickly as possible, Barrett would rather hold a job open for six weeks or more to make sure just the right person is hired.


    Barrett knows that her management style is definitely not straight out of HR 101. When she began working at The Container Store, she was just out of college, a French major with some work experience in sales. Perhaps her distinctive and creative take on HR is a direct result of having no preconceived notions about how to direct the people side of a business. What she didn’t know couldn’t become a stumbling block.


    Sitting back in her chair dressed in a white sweat suit with the distinctive blue company logo, she says that although she’s had no formal HR training, her 20 years of running HR at The Container Store has been her practical training ground. Working hand-in-hand with the organization’s founders, Garrett Boone, who serves as chairman, and Tindell, Barrett has used her own keen insight and business savvy to develop management strategies. It’s worked. Since it opened in 1978, the company now pulls in more than $214 million in annual revenue.


    As the original storage and organization goods retailer, the company attributes its success to accomplishments in several areas. In an industry where 100 percent turnover is common, The Container Store boasts a very low 15 to 20 percent . Forty-one percent of new hires come from employee referrals. But it’s the enthusiasm among workers that’s so palpable.


    It can be measured by taking a stroll through the organization’s headquarters, or the adjacent distribution center, or one of its 24 sites in the United States, or in its manufacturing facilities in Sweden. A stunning 97 percent of employees agree with the survey statement “People care about each other here.”


    In recent years, the firm has been praised as a leader in many business organizations. The Container Store received the Retail Innovator’s Award from the National Retail Federation based in Washington D.C. And the company has been ranked the best organization to work for in America by Fortunef magazine for the years 1999 and 2000 – the only time a company has won the honor two years in a row.


    The Container Store wins the Workforce magazine Optimas Award 2001 in the category of General Excellence for outstanding people-management strategies. These plans have resulted in the firm’s achievement of sustaining a 20 to 25 percent increase in annual sales each year.


    Sure, The Container Store set out to be a profitable business. But the question of how to reach that goal has always been the primary difference between The Container Store and many other retailers. The company’s founders never intended to grow for growth’s sake. Rather, they set out to adhere to certain business values centered around deliberate merchandising, superior customer service, and constant employee input.


    If you think of a start-up business as empty space around which you build boundaries – almost like taping up the six sides of a box – that’s exactly how company founders Boone and Tindell organized their ideas around building a strong company culture. It’s something few, if any, other retailers do.


    Not long after creating the company, Boone and Tindell created innovative parameters called foundation principles. They are a set of humanistic, spiritually based, do-unto-others philosophies. These principles are practiced internally among employees and are reflected in how they treat each other and how the company treats them. Ultimately this translates into a strong customer-service philosophy that allows all employees to take ownership of the company and make decisions based on their own intuition and discretion.


    The company strives to astonish its employees, which makes it an easy proposition for them, in turn, to astonish customers. “If we expect our employees to astonish customers, we have to first take care of them,” says Barbara Anderson, director of community services and staff development.


    “Because they’re going to treat customers the way we treat them. We can’t say, ‘Go be this wonderful person’ with a customer, but not treat them with respect. That’s where it all begins and that’s why we put so much time and energy into that. Someone needs to role-model how we treat each other.”


    True to its name, and its “Contain Yourself” slogan, the company approaches business with simplicity, straightforwardness, and a spirit of eagerness. By design, the company doesn’t contain creativity with rules. There’s no employee rulebook or manual. Instead, the company operates within a few uncomplicated but unwavering guidelines, such as always being flexible.


    When you’re the trailblazer in your own market niche, you start with a clean slate in designing business – including how you approach people management. Barrett doesn’t believe in a traditional HR structure, but instead has focused on a single concept: to support the business goals in the best way possible rather than to construct HR for HR’s sake.


    Like many small companies, The Container Store operated without a personnel department for several years. From the beginning, managers have been responsible for many of what are traditionally considered HR tasks because they’re closest to employees.


    “Many companies define HR as being almost solely responsible for attraction, motivation, and retention. Our approach has always been to entrust our great supervisors with that responsibility,” wrote Barrett in her memo to the company about the HR changes.


    “We know this helps in so many ways, from reduced turnover to clearer lines of communication, as well as a greater sense of trust and ownership in the company.” It also gives people who are ultimately responsible for HR functions more time to focus on strategic rather than tactical issues.


    In 1994, Barrett formalized the payroll and benefits functions into a semi-traditional human resources department. However, the recruitment and training activities were always distinct functions. More traditional HR activities such as compensation and payroll later followed under the HR umbrella.


    However, Barrett broke up the HR department last year into three separate functions, all still reporting to her. The recruiting and training departments have continued to operate as distinct areas, but the payroll, benefits, and workers’ compensation functions are now separate. “I spend a tremendous amount of my time really working with Garrett and Kip on building the structure, changing the structure, and looking at new areas of need,” Barrett says.


    Part of The Container Store’s unique management style is to give human resources managers responsibility for other areas of the company, such as store operations. This gives them a multifaceted view of the organization at all times.


    This year, as a get-back-to-basics effort, Barrett has directed HR managers and other senior staff members to take positions at the store level so they can even further reconnect with the company’s core purpose – to serve customers. Most employees start out working as salespeople, so this isn’t a new experience for them. Everyone in the company understands that the more they know about serving the core customer’s needs, the more successful they’ll be.


    The Container Store’s business is to solve customers’ one-of-a-kind storage and organization problems. Its people management practices also mirror this concept. The company has a focused people strategy: hire for fit; train comprehensively; and pay and support for longevity.


    Just as The Container Store finds storage solutions for its customers, it tailors jobs to people. The company customizes jobs to fit skills, abilities,and talents. The Container Store matches employees’ strengths with the needs of the company, focusing on talent rather than titles.


    From the beginning, the company’s operations team decided not to train employees by just dumping information into their heads. Instead, The Container Store decided early on to educate its workers using interactive techniques, and discussing the whys along with the whats and hows. “There’s a lot of philosophical discussion and education as opposed to just learning the keystrokes,” Barrett says.


    To achieve the company’s primary goal of providing extraordinary service, the firm invests in more than 235 hours of training for employees in their first year – an astonishing feat for a retailer in an industry that usually provides workers with an average of seven hours of training per year.


    Included in rookie training is a full week of orientation training, topped off with a session on learning the foundation principles, offered in an unscripted presentation delivered directly by new employees’ managers. But it isn’t just quantity that matters, quality is essential for The Container Store. It has achieved that end.


    Leonard Berry, a leading expert on service quality, profiled the company in his book, Discovering the Soul of Service: The Nine Drivers of Sustainable Business Success (Free Press, 1999). In his book, Berry concludes that the single most important factor in building a lasting service business isn’t a matter of savvy business practices but of humane values.


    After their first year at The Container Store, full-time employees receive an average of 160 hours of training annually. Although training has never fallen under HR at The Container Store, Barrett has provided leadership around all development activities, which includes measuring the direct impact of training on store sales. The company can prove that its substantial training investment has a measurable financial impact on the organization.


    “The impact of the training is long-term oriented,” Barrett says. “I mean, what we do today is going to impact the customer who comes in three months from now. So, it’s over time, and we’ve watched our dollar-per-customer grow from the late eighties when our average dollar-per-customer was in the low $20s. Our average dollar-per-customer now, depending on the market and the store, is headed for $50.”


    Looking beyond the minimum-wage concept, The Container Store has taken the bold move of paying employees two to three times the industry average, which cultivates fierce employee loyalty.


    “Kip and I worked for 18 years very closely on building the structure that allows us to pay more – to think out of the box and devote 10 percent of store sales to payroll,” Barrett says. The industry average is 3 to 4 percent. “I really don’t believe that [employees], especially at the store level are a focus in general for retail companies. Merchandise is their first focus and gross margin plays a huge role in determining payroll for a retail company.” This goes back to focusing on what the company considers its number one asset: employees.


    The company shares all financial information with everyone and offers benefits to all employees, both full- and “prime-timers” – people who work less than full time.


    The Container Store carefully cultivates a work environment that’s both fun and based on the company’s strong values. Many employees have left or retired from other careers where they’ve often experienced business cultures where trust and empowerment are only words on a mission statement. They aren’t lived daily by everyone from the top down.


    The company likes to hire its customers and usually employs college-educated people who are looking for a home at work. They want their quality of life at work to reflect their lifestyle, their beliefs, their values, and they’re usually seeing The Container Store philosophies as a good match for their value system,” Barrett says. “Often, it’s as simple as that.”


Workforce, March 2001, pp. 34-38 Subscribe Now!

Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

Defined Contribution Plans At a Medium-size Company

Education is essential, given the different retirement options available to employees today,says Craig Copeland, senior research associate with Employment Benefit ResearchInstitute. Unfortunately, not all employers are providing it. As a result, people leave companies with large sums of money in their retirement plans and little idea what to do with them.

MediumCompany
Name: MonarchMarking Systems
Location: Miamisburg,Ohio
Type of business: Manufacturer ofbar-code printers and related supplies
Numberof employees: 1,020

    That’s not the case at Monarch Marking Systems. Vice president of HR Rhonda Mangieri does her best to make sure of that at the Miamisburg, Ohio-based subsidiary of Paxar Corp. Monarch is a leading provider of bar-code printers and related software, services, supplies, and labels.


    The company also is on the cutting edge when it comes to technology-assisted HR. Retirement and pension options are no exception.


    Administration of Monarch’s more than $50 million defined contribution or 401(k) plan is paperless and has been since January 2000. Enrollment is primarily online through the outsourced 401(k) provider, CIGNA Corp.’s Retirement & Investment Services. (Plan enrollment and changes also can be done via telephone.)


    But Mangieri’s staff plays an active role nonetheless. Communication with employees and administrators doesn’t go away just because plan administration is outsourced. It’s especially important if employees are used to a more traditional paternalistic relationship, with direction and hand-holding from a company’s internal HR staff, says Mangieri. That staff still has a responsibility to keep on top of developments, and to remind employees of provider access numbers, plan availability, and general plan provisions.


    “It’s so important that when you outsource, people understand that you are not disconnecting them from the company but offering them more…. You always have to sell the value of your benefits and to sell the value of your benefits when they have been outsourced.”


    Mangieri’s staff has brochures for employees that list phone numbers, Web sites, and other contact information for all the company’s benefits vendors. The staff frequently updates employees about new plan or investment information from CIGNA, and periodically meets with employees to keep them informed. Plan updates and information also are posted the old-fashioned way on bulletin boards. Any HR staff member can answer general retirement-benefits questions, too, courtesy of a “cheat sheet,” even though one person specifically handles the benefits and works with third-party providers.


    Mangieri estimates that the company has reaped a 20 percent cost savings with itscurrent system. Her staff has downsized from 22 in 1996 to 13 before the full online launch in 2000 to just 5 today. Benefits administration alone went from four employees to just one person. Aside from administrative cost savings, the outsourced provider also does a better job in terms of communication with employees through material and online access, she adds.


    Employee reaction to the system has been good. They like the online visual access to their accounts better than the automated telephone responses that were used prior to January 2000, says Mangieri. There also doesn’t seem to be any reluctance on the part ofemployees or retirees to use PCs. Two years ago, Monarch, in a random sampling of about 500 manufacturing employees, found that 52 percent had PCs at home. That’s in addition to most employees already using PCs on the manufacturing floor.


    Another key element to the success of any company’s 401(k), says Mangieri, is communication between vendor and employer. “Make sure your provider understands your vision, your philosophy relative to providing services to your employees, and that one of those paramount things has to be education. They have to have a willingness to educate, to keep your group informed of what’s going on, and to do on-site educating of employees.”

Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

Avoiding Sexual-Orientation Discrimination

Sexual orientation discrimination isprohibited by many states as part of their employment discrimination laws.However, most employers don’t think it will become an issue in their workplace.As a result, many don’t have policies in place. Therefore, when an allegationdoes surface, the employer is ill prepared and more likely to be at adisadvantage if the case goes to court.


“Prejudice andhomophobia too often manifest themselves in the workplace in the form ofdiscrimination or harassment, and in more subtle ways as well,” say theHuman Rights Campaign, which maintains the largest full-time lobbying team inthe nation devoted to issues of fairness for lesbian and gay Americans.”These forces present significant challenges for employees deciding whetherto reveal their sexual orientation and for managers trying to create a climatethat promotes understanding and productivity.”


The bottom line foremployers sounds a lot like something from the book “Everything I Needed toKnow I Learned in Kindergarten”: Treat everyone the same.


Which means, just asyou cannot ask candidates about their marital status or plans to start a family,you also can’t ask whether they prefer relationships with men or women.Likewise, once someone is on your payroll and you learn that he or she is gay,you cannot treat him or her differently because of it.


For example, Ipresently represent two lesbians who filed a case against their school board.The case stems from the involuntary transfer of these two gay teachers, whoclaim that the decision was based on their sexual orientation. They were accusedof causing disruption to the workplace as a result of an incident instigated byanother school employee that occurred after school hours, off- campus. These twoteachers claim that by contrast, a heterosexual couple, also employed by thesame school board, was notorious for having arguments in the hallways duringschool hours, but they were never disciplined.


Here’s anotherexample from the American Civil Liberties Union Web site: “In her firstfour years as a reporter for a Los Angeles weekly newspaper, Cynthia Frazierreceived glowing reviews, won numerous awards for her writing, and quicklyadvanced from news editor and writer to associate editor. But after hersupervisor noticed vacation photos on Frazier’s desk of her and her partnerhugging, the atmosphere changed. Frazier was constantly harassed and reprimandedat work and eventually fired for insubordination. Frazier filed suit in 1994arguing she had been fired for being gay. The case is now on appeal.”


Employers who wantto avoid sexual orientation discrimination claims can take the following stepsto protect themselves from sexual orientation discrimination claims:


  • Publish and publicize a formalgrievance process. Make sure there is a formal process in place foremployees to air claims of harassment or sexual orientation discrimination.Outline this process in writing and notify every employee of the policy.


  • Take every complaint seriously.Conduct a thorough investigation and document your findings. Even though theburden of proof rests with the complaintant to prove that he or she has beendiscriminated against, it’s in your best interest to address the claimpromptly. Be proactive, not reactive.


  • Remain detached. Despite our bestefforts to eliminate them, there’s no denying that our personal biases playa part in our decision making and reactions. While we can’t eliminate ourbiases completely, we can identify them and detach from them. If you areuncertain of your ability to do so, consult a legal advisor regarding thecourse of action you are considering, or bring in a witness when you discussthe situation with the employee.


  • Prune the grapevine. Let’s face it,people talk. Even if an employee does not come to you with a complaint, ifyou get wind of a discriminatory act through the office grapevine, use it asan opportunity to remind everyone about company policy against sexualorientation discrimination and the options available to those who feel theyare being treated unfairly. In other words, attend to the sparks before theyignite.


  • Paper the file. I cannot stress thisenough. Just as documentation is critical for an employer who is facing aclaim of sexual orientation discrimination, it is equally important for theemployee who is making the claim. You need evidence that points to aspecific person. This physical evidence can take the form of witnesses,copies of emails, phone bills, etc. Document every word said and actiontaken, at the time it occurs, and keep copies in the company file as well asthe individual’s personnel file. Many people make the mistake of not doingso by claiming they don’t have the time or they’ll get to it later. Latermay be much too late. It’s difficult after the fact to recall eventsaccurately and many cases are lost because it becomes a game of “hesaid, she said.”


    When you’re in the middle of adiscrimination dispute, emotions run high. You may feel anger toward theemployee who brought the claim and that anger can interfere with yourability to recall events accurately. You don’t want to respond to a claimout of anger. That’s why it’s worth the time it takes to document events asthey occur, before the situation escalates.


When the lawprohibiting sexual harassment in the workplace was first enacted, it seemed asif everyone was filing a case. We’re at the tail end of that initial flurry.Enough people out there brought actions against employers that sexual harassmentis more clearly defined and boundaries have been established. I look for thesame cycle to occur in regard to sexual orientation discrimination. As more ofthese cases are heard, and won, the more homosexuals will have the courage tocome forward with their own stories.


Although litigationof sexual orientation discrimination may still be in its infancy stage, the factthat same sex adoptions have been recently approved bodes well for acceptance ofalternative lifestyles in the future. The law is concerned with fairness, notpersonal convictions. Regardless of whether or not you approve of someone else’schoices, we need to be more open to diversity in life.


While federal lawprovides basic legal protection against employment discrimination on the basisof race, gender, religion, national origin, or disability, it currently does notextend to sexual orientation. The proposed Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. For a listingof states that prohibit discrimination of the basis of sexual orientation, visitthe Human Rights Campaign Website.

Posted on February 28, 2001July 10, 2018

Create Great Customer Service

The department’s transformation of abloated, unworkable bureaucracy focused on flexibility, efficiency, recruiting,and innovation.


Flexibility
   Several areas of New York’s civilsystem were plagued by rigid policies that frustrated hiring agencies,employees, and candidates. One of the first steps in reform was to draft andpass legislation allowing state employees to transfer between agencies,essentially making the state one employer. The bill passed in 1996. That yearthe state workforce was reduced by 7,400 from the previous year. Because of thetransfer program, combined with attrition, retirements, and control of fillingand refilling vacancies, only 285 employees were actually laid off.


    The department also introduced bandscoring to increase flexibility in hiring managers. Traditionally, in order toqualify for a competitive position with the state, candidates had to have one ofthe top three scores on an exam. Now, competitive-level tests are band scored(i.e., 90, 95, 100), which gives agencies a larger pool of qualified candidatesto choose from.


Efficiency
   An excessive number of titles boggeddown the system. In December 1995, there were 6,220 job titles in New YorkState. By the year 2000, more than 2,300 titles had been eliminated. Now, forexample, a laboratory caretaker, elevator operator, and grounds worker all sharethe title of “building assistant I.”


    The department also made vastimprovements in civil service exam administration and reporting procedures. Forstate exam results, the time has been reduced from an average of 150 to lessthan 50 days. In some cases, same-day results are available. Exam takers canalso get performance profiles online.


    Applicants can register by telephone orin person. While computer technology is at the core of improving customerservice, the state strives to make information accessible to all constituents.


    Promotion test batteries have improvedhiring efficacy as well. Rather than traditional title-by-title testing formanagement-level positions, tests are administered to groups within a certainjob-grade level. This program received the International Personnel ManagementAssociation Assessment Council’s Year 2000 Innovations in Assessment Award.


    The provisional system was alsoencumbered by inefficiencies. Provisional employees are supposed to fillpositions for up to nine months until they can take the required qualifyingexam. In 1995, more than 5,500 employees were serving provisionally. Some hadbeen in that status for decades. The reforms included testing all provisionalemployees and improving exam processing. The number of provisional employees wasreduced by about 5,000.


Aggressive recruiting
   The civil service department has takenseveral steps to recruit new talent. It has revitalized a Public ManagementInternship program in affiliation with the Rockefeller Institute of Government.This program attracts promising young talent who are on the management track.The department also has stepped up efforts to attract candidates to other civilservice jobs, such as nursing and computer programming. It also launched the NewYork City Civil Service Outreach & Recruitment Center. It now works withmore than 500 community-based organizations.


Technological innovation
   The department has undergone a completetechnology infrastructure update to improve customer services. The expanded Website and secured-site services get praise from state and municipal civil serviceagencies. The department’s Web site has a wide range of information about civilservice employment, such as job announcements and exam dates. The EmployeeBenefits Division OnLine is a secure Web site that features electronic access tobenefits information.


    New York State Electronic PersonnelSystem (NYSTEP) was put in place to electronically process civil servicepersonnel transactions and classification activities. This increases access toinformation that is vital to managing the state’s workforce. The AccidentReporting System (ARS) was set up to automate and standardize procedures forreporting occupational injuries and accidents incurred by state employees. Thishas reduced the average accident-report filing time by more than 50 percent.


    “Getting Connected” was putin place to provide equipment to municipal civil service agencies to administerPC-based civil service tests, download test results, and correspond by e-mailwith the municipal service division of the civil service department and otherlocal agencies. This program also helps link local governments to other NYScounties, cities, towns, and villages.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress