Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Fundamental Elements of a Total Compensation System

The fundamental elements of a total compensation system, put together by Strategic Pay Partners of Pasadena, California.

 


Compensation Philosophy

Identifies target market position for competitive pay levels and articulates the company s commitment to motivating, and rewarding employee contribution and performance through the various elements of the company s total pay system.

Base Pay

Pays for standard job duties, skills and results. Should be designed to reflect competitive rates for comparable jobs within identified marketplace.

Performance Based Variable Pay

Designed to reward achievement of specific company and/or individual performance objectives. Payouts vary based on company and/or individual achievement. Types of variable pay plans include:


  • Skill pay
  • Incentive pay/bonus plans
  • Commission
  • Gain sharing/results sharing

Long Term Incentive Compensation

Designed to reward long term company performance. Individual job level/performance may impact eligibility to participate. Can be an effective retention tool.

Benefits

Broad range of practices including health insurance, vacation, leave policies, and retirement and savings plans. Designed to address health and welfare needs of employees. Can send strong messages about company culture and values.

Perks & Non-Cash Rewards

Used to recognize exceptional contribution, performance, commitment to culture and values. Variety of methods including additional time off, tickets to events, trips, dinners, public recognition, etc.

Intrinsic Rewards


  • Performance Feedback Management
  • Development Opportunities
  • Work Environment



Processes used to communicate and align employee behaviors with business priorities and company values to achieve desired results. Play a significant role in successfully engaging full scope of skills and abilities within the workforce.


Critical in retaining key talent.

Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Expatriate Resources

Consult the following Web sites for more information about training forexpatriates.


AcrossFrontiersInternational — Its interactive,multimedia computer-based training (CBT) covers an array of countries andtopics.


CraigheadGlobal Knowledge — Offers anarray of online offerings for business travelers and expatriates, includingdeveloping online policies and procedures, country information andcross-cultural distance learning.


KrollAssociates — Its Travel Watchservice details crime and problems in over 250 cities and 100 countries.


Pinkerton— Provides global intelligence services that track crime and incidentsworldwide.


Workforce, December1999, Vol. 78, No. 12, pp. 106-108 — Subscribenow!

Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Are You a Leader

When the effective leader is finished with his work, the people say it happened naturally.”
—Lao-Tzu,
Chinese philosopher
6th century, B.C.


There have been more articles and books written about leadership than any other topic. Everyone wants to know how to be a leader or what makes a great leader. Models are most commonly drawn from politics, the military, sports and business. The basic argument is whether leadership is an inherent trait or a learned skill. Theories have been built around both approaches. While forests have been devastated for paper on which to print these beliefs, at the end of the day, the question is still unresolved.


It often falls to human resource development departments to deliver a leadership course. The good news is there are a ton of them on the market. They run from esoteric models to outdoor team survival treks. The bad news is it’s difficult to pick the right one. One of the fundamental principles about any learning is that the farther the experience is from the realities in which the learning will have to be applied, the less chance there is for application.


This is the fallacy of college classroom surveys and outdoor programs. College students’ views of a given case hardly equate with what will happen when they get into the real world. Outdoor programs appeal to the young and fit and are a true pain in the back to others. And when that group gets back to reality, often called the job, there’s no research that supports building a raft or walking a tightrope develops a transferable business skill. It’s one thing to be cooperative in a game, and another when your career or bonus is on the line.


So, how do we develop leadership skills? After the bruises and blisters have healed what shall we look for, what shall we expect? I think there are places to look and ways to develop leadership skills.


The first place to look for leadership is in the mirror. Do you want to be a leader of anything? Are you compelled to grab a group and inspire them to reach great achievements? Or are you content to be a follower? There’s nothing wrong with being a good follower—without one there wouldn’t be a leader.


However, if you choose to let someone else take the lead, then you shouldn’t sit back and criticize the way they do it. If you aren’t involved in helping the leader, then you have no right to criticize. Someone once said, “There are two types of people: those who do something and those who sit on the sidelines and criticize. So join the first group where there’s less competition.”


Let s assume that you seek some degree of leadership. You might only want to lead a small group. That’s usually where it starts. If this is your case, what do you have to do? Where do you want to take the group? What is your goal? It simply could be mobilizing a family group to stop playing around and come to dinner. My wife s niece is a natural leader. At five feet tall and 95 pounds, she can organize 30 kids and adults to do anything in about two nanoseconds. You don t mess with Dina!


If your ambition is to lead a section or a department, you need a compelling idea to sell the group. After the group is moving down the track, you prepare others in the organization for your vision. You have to persuade them to help your group or to support your vision. Leadership is all about grasping the situation and persuading people to deal with it.


I’ve had the great pleasure of working with a number of true leaders during my naval service and my business career. Upon reflection, I found that a half dozen factors made them effective. The first and absolutely most essential characteristic is integrity. Persons who lack integrity often can lead good people for a time, but the end result is always disastrous. Second is the ability to communicate a clear vision of what must be and why. Vision implies risks and the ability to manage risk is essential in an effective leader.


The next two factors are personality traits. One is the insight to see beyond the obvious; to pick out the pitfalls and promises from what they see before them. The other is compassion for people. Truly great leaders know how to balance human and financial considerations. The last factor is the courage to make tough decisions.


Ram Charan and Geoffrey Colvin studied the failure patterns of high profile CEOs and published their findings in “Why CEOs Fail,” an article in the June 21, 1999, issue of Fortune. The key issue was their inability to pick the right people to execute their strategic plan and the related failure to fix people problems in time. When I headed a computer company s HR function, I tracked the reason for failure of top people over a seven-year period. Like Charan and Colvin, in every case I found that people skills were their downfall. Great ideas are fine, but effective leaders know how to manage people.


How about you? Do you have the knowledge, skill and savvy to be a leader? As Lee Iacocca, former CEO of Chrysler said, “Lead, follow, or get out of the way!”




Other columns by Jac Fitz-enz:


  • The One Right Way
  • Do People Really Add Value?

Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Disaster Volunteerism Builds Company-wide Spirit

As many as 30,000 families in North Carolina were affected by Hurricane Floydlast September. One of the towns in the flooded area received between 50 and 60inches of rain. People scrambled for everything from financial assistance forrent to replacements of such personal and household items as bed linens, cookingand eating utensils and medications.


In the midst of all the turmoil, companies from every corner of the statecame together to volunteer their money and services for some of the cleanup andrelief efforts, including Cary, North Carolina-based SAS Institute Inc., aprivately-held software company.


SAS Institute has long been recognized as the kind of workplace that valuesthe personal and professional growth of its employees. This spirit is carriedover into the community, as evidenced by the strong volunteerism exhibited bysome of its 6,000 employees during Hurricane Floyd. For openers, employeesdonated more than $102,000 to the American Red Cross in response to the company’sfund-raising effort to aid flood-ravaged Eastern North Carolina. The Institutematched the donation, resulting in a total donation of more than $204,000.


In addition, the Institute and its employees were active in cleanup andrelief efforts. Projects included assisting with the rescue of animals, removingfallen trees, cleaning houses, sorting supplies at the food bank, and movingfamilies who lost their homes into temporary living quarters.


At many companies across the country, the cornerstone of community relationsis often volunteerism. Done well, these programs can enhance a corporate image,boost employee morale and enrich the community-service experience. Done poorly,however, these programs can lead to frustration and lost productivity.


To learn more about how to conduct disaster volunteer programs that work,Workforce interviewed Kat Hardy, corporate, philanthropic and external programsspecialist at SAS Institute.


What sort of corporate volunteerism had your company done in the past?


Our volunteer programs have taken a wide scope in recent years. They’veincluded such things as participation in Net Day, a nationwide project to wireschools for Internet access, mentor programs with at-risk students, and SpecialOlympics World Games this past summer. Overall, an extensive and diverseselection of volunteer programs that has grown considerably in the last two anda half years.


What precipitated the call to volunteerism for the flood victims in easternNorth Carolina?


It would have gotten going even if we hadn’t done anything officially. Theminute we got back into the office after the flood, we started receivinghundreds of e-mails from employees who wanted to know how we, as a company, weregoing to help. There’s something about the employees here at SAS Institute,and I don’t know if it’s an outgrowth of the culture or what, but theemployees see this as a place that’s responsive to the community.


How much effort did it take to organize the SAS employees’ contributions tothe Red Cross for your flooded neighbors?


None whatsoever. Once we got the OK from the company to do the collectionsprogram, we sent out an e-mail that went to all the employees in Cary, NorthCarolina. I sent that out around 11 a.m. one day, and by the time I returnedfrom appointments a couple of hours later, I already had $2,000 sitting on mydesk. After that, we tried to get as much information to employees about whatwas happening in the community so they could tap into the volunteer programs onan individual basis.


We also did some really neat matchmaking. For example, one employee who saidshe was getting ready to move said she wanted to donate her furniture instead ofholding a yard sale. We connected her specifically with the niece of anotheremployee, whose apartment was wiped out. We tried to find opportunities likethis. As for the company, we looked at the different places where volunteerismwas happening. We found a project with a local television station that wassending buses down to homes that had been damaged by the flood. That seemed likea good way for us to tap into a program that would have a direct impact onpeople’s lives.


How well-organized was the volunteer group that traveled to eastern NorthCarolina to help with some of the cleanup and relief efforts?


The 20 to 30 folks that we sent from the company had designated homes, thanksto the TV stations that organized this particular relief effort. It seemed to goquite smoothly, and it turned out to be a good partnership.


Thousands of volunteer hours are contributed each year by SAS employees, buthow many actually volunteered for the cleanup and relief effort?


About 20 to 30 [people volunteered] just for that one service. But we hadanother hundred or so that I could name who did things on their own. Lots offolks helped out with the care of animals that were left behind in the flood. Wehad folks who went down to the food bank, folks who cut down trees. And thenabout 900 of our employees contributed to the $102,000 [we donated].


Can employees take time from their jobs to volunteer?


We don’t have a formal paid-time-off policy, but we do have a flexible workenvironment. Employees have the freedom to work it out on a one-to-one basiswith their managers to do some volunteer work when it happens during workinghours. Generally, managers will ‘flex’ the time when appropriate. Employeescertainly don’t lose pay.


What’s the relationship between human resources and your department?


Our volunteer coordinator is a member of the HR staff, the work/lifedepartment. Probably 80 to 90 percent of her time is spent on the company’svolunteer programs so there’s a really close link between HR and publicaffairs, which gives us both an employee and philanthropic focus. She works outlogistics and communications. She answers employee questions, registersemployees for volunteer programs, and researches new projects.


This team approach has worked wonderfully. We feel like we get a broaderperspective in the whole decision-making process, and we get more information byhaving two divisions.


Are managers encouraged to use volunteer activities as career-developmentactivities?


Actually we haven’t looked into that, but we encourage managers to use themas team-building activities.


Are the results of your volunteer programs reported back to the employees viaa newsletter or Web site?


With this particular project, we [sent] a companywide e-mail, and we put anarticle on our intranet. We have a section on our internal home page that’sdevoted to daily news. Those articles are updated on a daily basis, so we keptan article there about the volunteer donation projects.


In general, though, we include all information and photos on our company’sinternal and external Web sites, as well as the printed version of our employeenewsletter. It helps reinforce employee morale for our volunteer programs. Itlets them know the company thinks what they’re doing is important enough forus to share with the rest of the company and the outside world. And it alsohelps us the next time we’re recruiting; when employees hear good things aboutthe last volunteer project we did, they’re more likely to get involved.


It’s been said that volunteerism, done well, can enhance a corporate image,boost employee morale and enrich community services. Done poorly, it can lead tofrustration and lost productivity. What separates one from the other?


One big factor is the folks who are responsible for organizing the projectneed to have their homework done. If you’re starting a volunteer program,first find out what your company has done in the past, if anything. If you canfind a nugget to grab onto, anything, take that run with it. Use it as alaunching pad. Turn it into a companywide project. That’s basically what wedid.


Two years ago, it was hodgepodge, but we made an effort to become aware ofwhat was available in the community. We listened, watched the news, read, andexamined everything to see if it felt like a good match for our employees.


If you already have a volunteer program, do your homework. If we’ve gotemployees volunteering but we can’t answer questions about what clothes theyshould wear or if lunch will be provided, that creates a lot of frustration.Figure out the goal you’re trying to meet so you can communicate that clearlyto volunteers, before and after the project. Make sure you know all of the nutsand bolts that need to go into place as you’re doing the recruiting. Andcommunicate that to the volunteers.


Is there a business return for employees who volunteer their services, andhow do you measure that?


There’s definitely a business return, both in terms of employee morale andteam building. One of the things that happens when you have 3,000 employeesworking on one work site is that you don’t know everybody by name or evenface. You tend to know only those who work in your division on your floor.


Our volunteer projects give people a chance to build relationships across thecompany in different divisions, with R&D managers working alongside day-careworkers. So there’s an opportunity for folks to interact that doesn’t happenon a day-to-day basis.


Externally, it’s really nice to have that image in the community — theimage of a contributor. We think we’ve gotten a lot support from the communityby showing people we’re giving back in tangible ways. It’s important for usand it’s important for the community.


It’s been said that a successful volunteer effort is aligned with thecompany’s mission, capitalizes on employees’ strengths and ideally,strengthens their weaknesses. Has this been the case with SAS Institute?


Our volunteer programs are an integral piece of our philanthropic attitude,which focuses on education and children and families at risk. Recently, though,we’ve broadened the scope of our volunteer projects beyond those two areas,recognizing the needs of our employees, as much as the needs of the community.


We try to have a mix of projects that tap into a wide range of interests,values and issues that employees care about. For example, we have employees whovolunteer at the soup kitchen, employees who mentor kids in high school andgrade school, and we recently had a crew of 80 or so employees who helped builda neighborhood playground. These projects are chosen by the philanthropy staffand our volunteer coordinator with the human resources department. We all worktogether to look at the options in the community, to review what we’ve done sofar, and to figure out what we can do in the future.


Do you conduct surveys to determine which projects are appreciated byemployees?


We haven’t done that yet, but we get a lot of suggestions from employees.The visibility of these projects in the company is really high right now. Ouremployees know who they can call with a suggestion or a request. And we listen.That’s where we get a lot of our ideas from. The neighborhood playgroundproject, for example, was the result of an employee suggestion.


Above all else, we make sure everything’s aligned with our company mission.It’s one of our goals to better serve the industry, our customers and to hireand keep the best people. One of the ways we’re able to do that is to let ouremployees know they’re valuable to us. And what’s important to them isimportant to us.


Workforce, December1999, Vol. 78, No. 12, p. 111 — Subscribenow!

Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Stock Options Have Their Ups & Downs

Like many chief executives, Howard Schultz was thrilled when his company,Starbucks Corp., went public in June 1992. On the first day of trading, thestock closed at $21.50 — up from an opening price of $17. Not only did the CEO’snet worth zoom, the coffee retailer had finally reached the big leagues. Butinstead of hoarding his beans, Schultz decided that he would give some of themback to employees in the form of stock options. At a time when other firmsoffered options only to key senior executives, Schultz made them available toeveryone working 20 hours a week or more, including those standing behind thecounter at a local Starbucks store.


Today, Seattle-based Starbucks has a market capitalization somewhere in theneighborhood of $4.2 billion and about 2,100 stores in Asia, Canada, the UnitedKingdom and United States. But Schultz hasn’t veered away from his originalphilosophy of giving employees a stake in the company. More than 10,000 of thefirm’s 26,000 workers participate in the plan, which Starbucks refers to asits “Bean Stock” program. They’ve made down payments on houses,purchased cars and paid for their college education. Meanwhile, the company hasmanaged to cut turnover to approximately one-third the industry norm.


Stock options. These days, the words are everywhere. And it’s not difficultto understand why. Pick up a newspaper or click on the television and you’relikely to hear about some young entrepreneur who’s worth tens of millions –sometimes even billions of dollars — through options. There’s Jeff Bezos ofAmazon.com, whose paper wealth is somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 billion– despite a 1998 salary of $81,840. There’s Michael Dell, who’s worth acool $22 billion as founder and chairman of Dell Computer. And then there’sBill Gates, whose personal fortune resides somewhere in the galaxy of $105billion — almost all from Microsoft stock.


But behind the glitzy façade and the media hoopla, stock options havequietly become a way for companies to attract, retain and reward workers. They’realso a way for organizations to align the workforce with shareholder value. FromAmazon.com to Xerox, companies are turning to stock options in record numbers.And while the great bull market of the 1990s has unquestionably fed into thefrenzy, it would be a mistake to tag the phenomenon solely to the popularity ofstocks. To be certain, options have become an entrenched compensation strategy– and are profoundly altering the corporate landscape.


Take stock of the past


The idea for stock options is actually rooted in the 1930s, though thepractice didn’t take place in any real way until the 1960s. At that time,major corporations began offering top executives stock options as a way to boostpersonal income and tie performance to shareholder value. Then, in the 1980s,Congress slashed tax rates and the stock market awakened from a 10-year slumber.CEOs like Disney’s Michael Eisner and Toys “R” Us CEO CharlesLazarus began to garner headlines for receiving huge options windfalls, whichtotaled tens of millions of dollars.


Since then, the popularity of stock options — not to be confused withEmployee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) which are geared toward retirementsavings — has zoomed along with the stock market. According to Sanford C.Bernstein & Co., the total value of shares set aside for options grants inthe United States increased from $59 billion in 1985 to $600 billion by 1996.More than 90 percent of public companies now have employee stock-optionprograms. And, recently, the practice has begun to spread to Japan and othercountries.


“Stock and stock options are becoming the preferred currency forcompensation programs in the U.S.,” notes Heidi Toppel, a regional practiceleader for Watson Wyatt Worldwide. “More employers are providing stockoptions beyond the executive management level. In most cases, the goal is toalign workers and shareholders, boost retention and allow employees to share inthe company’s success.”


Companies find stock options so attractive for a basic reason: they don’tcost them anything yet they boost pay. Thanks to a glitch in tax law, theoptions don’t have any cash value. What’s more, when workers exerciseoptions, the tax code allows the company to deduct the gain as an expense,despite the fact it hasn’t spent any money. Ultimately, the wealth is createdby the stock market itself and the company can boost its profit by reducinglabor expenses. “In a sense, it’s funny money,” says Mike Butler,who heads the employee ownership consulting practice for Hewitt Associates.


Employees like stock options because they can buy their company’s stocksometime in the future, but at the market price when issued. For example, aperson who is granted an option at $50 a share hopes the stock will rise. If theprice climbs to, say, $75 a share, the holder can exercise the option and net ataxable profit of $25 per share. However, if the stock drops to $25 and doesn’tbounce back, the options expire worthless. Ditto if a person holds onto thestock too long or it never rises.


Yet, despite their enormous popularity — and success — stock options cancreate problems. In some cases, companies have struggled to keep vestedemployees on the payroll once they’ve cashed in options to the tune ofmillions of dollars. In fact, companies like Oracle and Microsoft have hundreds,even thousands of employees that have joined the “millionaire” club asa result of stock options. Other firms have learned the hard way that if thecompany’s stock crashes or remains stagnant for a prolonged period, it canwreak havoc. “There are lots of issues to grapple with. It’s not assimple as starting a program and expecting it to succeed,” warns Butler.


Xerox explores its options


Paula Flemming knows that fact well. As director of HR effectiveness at XeroxCorp. in Stamford, Connecticut, Flemming has struggled with an array of issuesto build a viable program. Although the company has had a profit-sharing programin place since the early 1970s, it opted to change the mix from 100 percent cashto 50/50 cash and stock in 1998. In January 1999, it awarded $8.2 million instock options to 48,000 of the firm’s 52,000 U.S. employees. After one year ofemployment, an employee is eligible to receive options, which are valid foreight years. An employee is considered vested a year after receiving the firstoptions.


A key in setting up the program, says Flemming, was ensuring that the rightunderlying metrics were in place. Instead of using return on assets as anindicator, Xerox opted to use growth and earnings per share. “We wanted totie the program into shareholder value,” she explains. Moreover, thecompany increased the maximum payout for the profit sharing program from 10percent to 15 percent of total wages.


“The biggest message the company is trying to send to employees centerson ownership. An employee who has a stake in the company’s performance is farmore likely to help it grow and boost its stock value. The program also letsemployees participate in the same wealth accumulation opportunity that has beenavailable to executives for years. Performance-based pay is an effective way tomotivate a workforce,” she adds.


However, Xerox is a prime example of the challenges and risks of stockoptions. Last May, the stock peaked at nearly $64 a share. After the companyannounced lower than expected earnings in October, the stock price plummeted tothe low 20s. Today, all employee stock options are underwater, meaning thatemployees are unable to buy them. And that, says Flemming, presents a barrier –especially if the company’s stock performs poorly over the next several years.


However, in the past, Xerox execs who have held options for extended periodshave enjoyed the greatest gains; the stock has always recovered from downturns.As a result, she and other human resources executives provide constant educationabout stock investing in general and the company’s options program inparticular.


Butler believes that the tremendous growth of stock-option programs is partlyan attempt to remain competitive and attractive in the labor marketplace. In anera of reduced stability and job security, “It’s a natural way toencourage employee loyalty. It’s a way of saying, ‘You might not work hereforever, but while you’re here, we expect 110 percent — and in return we’llshare the wealth with you.’” However, he also argues that these programsare partly a result of “executive guilt.” Over the last two decades,says Butler, “CEOs and senior executives have reaped millions of dollarsfrom stock options, and now many of them feel that stock options are necessaryat the employee level in order to avoid a feeling of inequity amongemployees.”


Of course, not all stock options are created equal — and the way differentcompanies approach the issue varies greatly by industry. High-techentrepreneurial companies — including many of the Internet high flyers thathave popped up over the last few years — depend heavily on stock options toprovide compensation. Many pay salaries far below market value. Yet “acertain type of person — often someone in their 20s or 30s, and usually withouta home and family — is attracted because of the opportunity to hit the optionsjackpot while doing work that’s interesting,” says Butler. In fact, somework at two, three or even five startups before making any real money in stockoptions — almost always through an initial public offering (IPO). Others neverhit pay dirt.


Stock options can present challenges


All that glitters isn’t necessarily gold. What happens to a company thatwinds up with dozens, even hundreds of millionaires who no longer need to comeinto work because they have all the financial security they’ll ever require?Do they run for the exits in droves — taking valuable intellectual capital withthem? Not necessarily, experts say. For one thing, a well-designed program willcontinue to grant options every year, so that a person can continue toaccumulate wealth through the company’s stock. For another, many of theworkers who are attracted to these high-tech, entrepreneurial companies find thework stimulating. “Pay isn’t the only issue, or even the primary issuefor some workers. It’s the ability to have an impact and do somethingexciting,” Butler explains.


Consider Broadcom Corp., an Irvine, California, company that manufacturesmicrochips and other components used in cable modems, DSL modems, digital cableset top boxes and high-speed networking gear. The company went public in 1998,and since then it has seen its stock rise six-fold. The net result? More than 75percent of the firm’s 800 plus employees are millionaires on paper. Yet thecompany only lost four employees last year, says Nancy Tullos, vice president ofhuman resources. “It’s a stimulating place to work, employees feel asense of ownership, and senior management has been smart enough to createongoing stock incentives to keep people at the company,” she explains.


Tullos admits that a downturn in the stock could present difficulties, butshe believes the reason for lagging stock performance is crucial. “IfBroadcom started missing key design wins and experiencing internal problems,then we would have a reason to be concerned. If it’s simply a reflection ofthe market, then we feel there’s no reason to worry. The key is that we don’twant to lose our edge and we don’t want employees to lose their edge,”she explains. Yet, as the firm matures and stock options represent less of apotential windfall, she points out that Broadcom will begin paying highersalaries and providing other benefits.


Indeed, there’s also the issue of pay equity, which can create headachesfor everyone. Because some employees join a company on the ground floor –before an IPO — they might receive a larger number of stock options thansomeone who starts later. However, the company might find it necessary to paythe latter employee more — in order to make up some of the difference. The netresult, particularly at these entrepreneurial companies: a manager might earn$50,000 a year in wages while a subordinate receives $75,000. Likewise, thosewho join a company later might not see the same kind of appreciation in thecompany’s stock as those who join a start up.


Of course, that’s a far different scenario than for mainstream companiessuch as Citicorp, Kodak, Merck, Starbucks, United Airlines and Xerox. In themajority of cases, workers at these firms aren’t looking to get rich fromstock options, they just hope to accumulate money for a down payment on a houseor a trip to Europe.


That’s the case for Jessica Gleeson, who works in the corporate trainingdepartment at Starbucks. She started at the company in 1990 — serving coffee ina Seattle store — while attending the University of Washington. A year later,CEO Howard Schultz announced Starbucks would offer stock options to employeeswho work at least 20 hours a week.


Gleeson purchased stock from the options, then sold it in 1995 for a $15,000profit. That became the down payment on a new home. Now, she’s preparing tofly to Paris for a year-2000 celebration — also funded from company stock thatshe sold recently. “Bean Stock has definitely given me a much strongerfeeling of ownership in the company,” she says. In fact, a couple of yearsago, Gleeson devised a way to save the company $1 million a year by reducingin-store waste. “People wind up treating the organization’s money like it’stheir own money,” she adds.


According to Helen Chung, a spokesperson for Starbucks, the stock-optionprogram fits into an overall HR strategy, which includes an array of otherbenefits. The Bean Stock program provides options based on the annual success ofthe company, and every year the board of directors decides how many options willbe available to workers. In 1998, for example, workers received stock optionsequal to 14 percent of their annual wages. After a year, an employee is 20percent vested; after five years a worker is 100 percent vested. The companyalso operates a separate stock investment program (SIP), which allows employeesto buy shares outright through the company every quarter at a 15 percentdiscount.


How much longer will stock options soar?


Despite the enormous success of stock options, potential storm clouds loom.One of the things that have made options so appealing is the stellar bull marketof the 1990s. In an environment of rising stock prices, options succeed.


However, experts agree that a prolonged bear market could it make it nearlyimpossible for companies to use options effectively. In addition, critics havecontinually lobbied Congress and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)to change the tax code to make options an actual expense — something that couldcost major corporations hundreds of millions of dollars a year. So far, attemptsto change the system have fallen mostly on deaf ears.


If fact, it’s a pretty good bet that the situation won’t change anytimesoon. “Stock options have clearly changed the corporate landscape,”says Toppel. “They have become a key form of compensation and an importantpart of the economy. When a program is successful employers and employees comeout ahead.”


Workforce, December1999, Vol. 78, No. 12, pp. 44-47 — Subscribenow!

Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

HR 101 Compensation

HR 101 is a special monthly section that gives you everything you need to know about important HR topics. This month, a set of tips, charts and data should help you in your effort to make an impact with your pay practices.

Posted on December 1, 1999June 29, 2023

Employee Benefits of a Noncompete

In light of the fact that there are obvious disadvantages for an individualto sign a noncompete agreement, why would one do so? For many employees, it’sbecause it’s a condition of their employment — i.e., they won’t be hired orwill be terminated if they don’t sign the agreement. Further, many employeessign noncompete agreement because they’re part of the numerous employmentpapers that they sign in the pre-hire process, and are probably told it is justa standard agreement that all employees sign or must sign. Others sign suchagreements to show their loyalty, their intent to be a “team player.”


Increased Responsibility


Though certain drawbacks are part and parcel to a noncompete agreement,there are benefits, as well. Fundamentally, negotiated restrictions clarify theparties’ obligations. For an employee, the existence of the contractuallimitations may assist the employee in long-term decision making and planningformulations.


Furthermore, given the protections that are afforded by the restrictivecovenant signed by the employee, the employee may feel that the employer istreating the employee as an integral element of the employer’s organization.


To that end, the existence and security of the noncompete agreement mayencourage an employer to use an employee who’s subject to such an agreement insignificant and confidential business decisions and operations. “Someemployers may be more likely to impart knowledge, training or responsibility toemployees who are bound to the company by some type of noncompeteagreement,” says James W. Wimberly of Wimberly, Lawson, Steckel, Nelson& Schneider in Atlanta.


Increased Negotiating Power


An additional benefit of negotiated contractual restrictions is that it givesan employee the ability to refuse an initial offer of employment or seekadjusted benefits to compensate for the negotiated restriction. In fact, somestates require the employee to receive additional consideration, above andbeyond mere employment, in exchange for a noncompete agreement.


“In 30 to 40 percent of cases in which employees sign a noncompete, theemployee recognized that it was a major give but wanted the job badly enough, orit was a negotiated provision in a truly negotiated contract where the employeegets something in return,” says Steven Kayman of Proskauer Rose in New YorkCity. For example, an employee may receive a higher salary or increased fringebenefits due to the existence of the restrictive covenant. Or the employee mayreceive compensation beyond termination of employment and throughout the periodthe noncompete is in effect. Of course, for applicants or employees with aunique skill set or substantial knowledge base, the ability to bargain over theterms contained in the agreement or the amount of compensation is greater.


Workforce, December1999, Vol. 78, No. 12, p. 50 — Subscribenow!



Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

A Quick Breakdown of Strategic Pay

While there are no set rules or procedures to follow to ensure the effectiveness of a company’s total compensation system, there are certain fundamentals all worthwhile pay strategies have in common.


An effective total compensation system is comprised of a combination of fundamental elements—including both cash and non-cash rewards—designed to support the company’s compensation philosophy, motivate and reward performance aligned with critical business objectives, and provide a positive rate of return on the significant dollars invested in compensation.


First, a company must establish its compensation philosophy. This philosophy identifies desired market position by articulating where the company wants to position pay levels with respect to competitive market practice, e.g., median market levels, 75th percentile pay levels, etc.


In addition, the compensation philosophy sends a message to employees about the organization’s commitment to motivating, recognizing and rewarding employee contribution and performance.


Once the compensation philosophy is established, an organization must decide what elements of a total pay program are most appropriate given the business objectives, operating environment and culture of the company. In this process they should consider the following:


Base-Pay Management
The foundation for any effective compensation system is a competitive base-pay program. Base pay is the fixed rate of compensation an employee receives for performing the standard duties and tasks of a job.


Base-pay programs should be designed to reflect competitive market practices within the company’s identified competitor group. Several steps are required to develop an effective base-pay program:


First, the appropriate competitive market must be identified. Companies must consider various scope factors including their industry, geographic location, total employment, and annual revenue when identifying their competitive market. In addition, it’s important to consider not only business competitors, but people competitors as well—those organizations you get talent from or lose talent to, regardless of their size, industry or location.


The second step is to conduct an assessment of market pay practices for similar jobs within the identified competitor group. Accurate job documentation and defining the duties, skills and impact levels of each job analyzed is critical to the quality of the data. In a market assessment, the organization compares its current pay levels to competitor pay levels for jobs of similar size, scope and impact level.


As the third step in this process, using the results of the market assessment as the basis, a company can develop a framework—typically referred to as a salary structure—for managing competitive base pay levels for all jobs across the organization.


A salary range usually consists of a salary minimum, maximum and a midpoint or control point.


The minimum represents the lowest competitive rate for jobs within that range and is typically used as a starting point for less experienced employees.


The maximum represents the highest competitive rate for jobs in the range. This is typically a premium market rate where top performers and those with extensive experience may be paid.


The midpoint or control point represents the competitive market rate for fully performing employees in jobs assigned to that range. The midpoint provides a guideline for slotting various jobs and individuals in appropriate salary ranges.


A typical salary structure is comprised of a series of pay ranges or bands that reflect competitive rates of pay for specific jobs in the marketplace and provide an opportunity for salary growth. Jobs of similar value from both a market and internal perspective are grouped together. Then a competitive salary range is developed around the market rates for those specific jobs.


Merit Increases
Once the salary structure is in place, an organization must determine the most effective way for employee salaries to progress through the salary ranges over time.


The most common practice in place today is the use of merit pay. Merit pay is intended to provide a system to reward employee performance through increases to base pay. In its most basic form, a merit increase is the amount of additional compensation added to current base salaries following a review of employee performance. In most organizations, two critical factors typically impact the amount of merit increase awards:


  • The amount of money a company sets aside in its “merit” budget for performance-based increases—usually based on competitive market practice.
  • Employee performance as determined through a performance review process conducted by managers of the company for their subordinate employees.

At some organizations, a third factor also is considered—”position in range,” i.e., where individual pay falls with respect to the range midpoint. For instance, at companies that are interested in tightly managing to their midpoint, an employee at the low end of the competitive range may be eligible to receive a higher percentage increase than his or her counterpart currently being paid above the midpoint.


While merit increases are still an active component of most compensation systems, they are increasingly ineffective in achieving their original intent—recognizing employee performance and outstanding contributions to the company’s success.


Due to their limited size and inability to truly distinguish levels of performance, merit increases are often perceived as an entitlement or merely a cost of living adjustment. Rarely are they effective in motivating and rewarding exceptional performance.


Performance-based Variable Pay
The use of performance-based variable pay across all levels of an organization continues to gain momentum as a more effective way to recognize and reward employee performance. No longer restricted to senior management levels, incentive or bonus compensation programs, as they are commonly called, are being designed to reward achievement of specific company and/or individual performance objectives.


In variable pay plans, the size of the award “varies” between individuals and from performance period to performance period based on levels of achievement against pre-established company and individual performance targets.


There are a variety of variable pay plan designs in place today. Plan designs range from sales-commission plans to individual incentive or bonus plans to team awards and gainsharing or results-sharing plans.


An organization must determine the overall objective it wants to achieve with variable pay and consider their specific operating characteristics when determining the pay-design approach that will be most effective. As with base-pay levels, an assessment of market practice can be helpful in understanding the kinds of systems in place within the target competitive market.


Variable pay awards are commonly paid in cash on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis depending on the plan design. Awards are typically determined based on a combination of company and individual performance against pre-established goals or targets.


Individual award size is typically based on competitive practice and the company’s ability to pay. Amounts are often calculated as a percent of base pay depending on job category and position.


It seems to be a fact of today’s competitive landscape that variable pay programs are increasing in importance and in value when it comes to attracting, rewarding and retaining talent. The design, value and clarity of an incentive program can be the deciding factor in an employee’s choosing to accept or decline a job offer when all other factors such as base pay and benefits are the same.


If implementing a variable pay plan seems somewhat overwhelming, just remember how valuable a tool it can ultimately be. At their best, incentive pay plans reward employee contributions to company success and encourage a shared sense of ownership for business results across an organization.


Long-Term Incentive Compensation
We’re all certainly aware of the power and impact of stock-option plans in today’s market. Millionaires are made overnight for being in the right place at the right time and for having been awarded the right amount of stock options in the right company.


However, from a compensation fundamental perspective, stock-option plans and other long-term incentive compensation vehicles are still far less frequently used to reward performance than base pay increases or annual incentives. In addition, they still tend to be used more commonly at senior levels in an organization or for key talent or critical hires.


Stock-option and other deferred-compensation plans reward employees based on company performance over the long term—typically three to five years. Stock-option plans are a prevalent form of long-term compensation at public organizations. At private companies, plans that mirror stock plans but are based on internal values or deferred-compensation plans are often used for key employees.


From an overall perspective, long-term compensation plans can be very effective retention tools. At their most effective, they focus key employees on driving and improving the financial performance of the company over the longer term.


Non-cash Reward and Recognition Practices
While each organization approaches non-cash rewards differently, consideration should be given to each of the following practices when developing a total pay strategy:


  • Benefits: A comprehensive, competitive benefits package typically includes medical insurance, life insurance, vacation and leave policies and some form of company-sponsored retirement or savings plan. Plans are typically designed to address the health and welfare needs of the employee population. Benefits can send strong messages to employees about company culture and values. To help offset the significant expense associated with comprehensive benefit plans, costs are often shared with employees.
  • Perks and Non-cash Rewards: Perks and non-cash rewards are used by many companies to recognize significant individual or team contributions to special projects, or for exhibiting a strong commitment to the values and culture of the company. A variety of awards are used including special dinners, event tickets, trips, additional time off, etc.
  • Intrinsic Rewards: Intrinsic rewards are expressed through an organization’s commitment to openly communicate with employees about things that matter most. The value and effectiveness of performance feedback, career-development opportunities and the belief that their voices are heard are very important elements of employee recognition. Fundamentally, we all want to feel like we’re in a place that values us—effectively managed communication and feedback processes can go a long way in promoting this feeling among employees and in retaining critical talent.

Workforce, December 1999, Vol. 78, No. 12, pp. 72-75.


Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Ideas for Using the Internet as a Pro-active Employee Relations Tool

Some ways you can use employee surfing to the advantage of your company:


  1. Put your ear to the virtual ground.
    Use electronic tools to quickly gauge what’s on people’s minds. What are the issues that get the attention of cyber-surfers, chat room participants, or bulletin board contributors? Whether aimed at your company, a competitor, or employers in general, get up an up to the minute employee relations weather report.

  2. Develop an effective defense strategy.
    Let’s say you do come across some bad press about your company. Use credible Internet sites to quickly assess the extent of the employee relations impact. By hearing directly from those who care strongly enough to participate in these online forums, you will get a better handle on issues important to them.

  3. Keep things in perspective.
    The Internet is a just in time information highway. Like other climate surveys, what they say should be interpreted in a broader context of the current environment.

  4. Save the bookmark.
    Return to reliable sites to get a longer view of what changes in the workplace prompt virtual discussion, when the discussion starts following these events, the extent to which the views express those of the broader workforce, and how long it takes for discussion to taper off.

  5. Test the waters before jumping in.
    The anonymity of the web allows some people to more freely express feelings or ideas they would be reluctant to share with others in person. But it’s always a good idea to confirm information through multiple sources.

Posted on December 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Job Offers Closing the Deal

With the unemployment rate hovering at a 29-year low at 4.1 percent (as ofOctober 31, 1999), hiring is serious business. First you have to find the rightemployees — which, these days, is like looking for a needle in a haystack.Then, once you’ve found prospective employees, you have to let them know whyyours is the best company to work for, over other choices they may have.Finally, once you’ve wowed them with the opportunity, you have to close thedeal. And you have to do it quickly or another employer will snap them up with abetter deal faster than you can say, “Show me the money.”


How do you close employment deals rapidly without sealing your doom by hiringthe wrong people in haste? Here are some pointers on how to make, and close,employment deals quickly and effectively.


Make an Offer They Can’t Refuse


You’ve spent weeks, maybe even months, finding the right people. You’vescreened, interviewed, tested and evaluated. Now it’s time to make an offer.Although they’re not often thought of as critical points in the hiringprocess, because human resources professionals and hiring managers usually feellike by the time they’re making an offer a candidate has already pretty muchcommitted to working for their firm.


Don’t be fooled.


The offer letter and the subsequent negotiating phase are extremely importantaspects to sewing up the right deal with the right employees. These stages canactually make or break the deal. If these steps are done incorrectly, acandidate may snub you for the employer up the street. It’s as important toknow what to say, as it is to know what not to say.


Can you put that in writing?


Linda Konstan, president of LMK Associates, an HR consulting firm based inDenver, says a lot of her clients recently have experienced the followingscenario: A company representative makes a verbal offer. The candidate accepts.The rep tells the candidate he or she will receive a written offer in the mail.But by the time the written offer arrives, the candidate often has alreadyaccepted an offer from another company.


It’s a situation of too many jobs, and too few people to fill them. It canbe a hiring nightmare. And the problem is: If you snooze, you lose.”Consequently, a lot of my clients are changing the methodology of offerletters,” says Konstan.


Now they have an offer letter template that allows them to just fill in theblanks with the right numbers and dates. They then fax the offer letterimmediately to the candidate with an expectation of having a faxed copy backfrom them within 24 hours, and a hard copy mailed back the same day as well.


What to say


Here’s what Peter Firla, director of human resources for InfiltratorSystems Inc. of Old Saybrook, Connecticut, keeps in mind when he’s writing anoffer letter: “[It’s important to] understand the values, expectationsand longer-range issues a candidate has, and to ensure those elements areincluded in the offer.”


“It’s critical to get as much information as possible about thecandidate’s present situation because you’re generally recruiting people whoare gainfully employed and not necessarily unhappy in their present roles,”says Joan Farrell, an independent HR consultant based in Ocean City, New Jersey.


Knowing not only how the 401(k) match works, but which fund families they caninvest in through their current employer versus what your firm offers, iscritical to knowing whether the candidate will view your plan as a gain or aloss. “Professional candidates are far more savvy than they used to be atcosting an entire package against their present situation instead of justexamining the base salary,” says Farrell.


That’s why it’s critical to know what your competition is offering, andto know what your candidate wants the most from your particular firm. You shouldalso know the relative cost of living in your company’s location if relocationis necessary. “They’ll look up that information on the Internet, so beatthem to it and consider the data in the offer,” adds Farrell. “Youwant to put together a fair package in terms of total value. Once you’ve donethat, you can fine-tune it to the candidate’s specific needs and wants,”she adds.


You should build in some negotiating room up front, so that if the candidatecomes back asking for some relatively minor enhancements, you can approve themon the spot. “This makes the firm look like it’s responsive andinterested in the person, not just in the ‘rules,’” says Farrell.”And on the subject of rules — one-size-fits-all doesn’t work in a tightlabor market. Consider offering some things at ‘better than plan’ with areturn to plan at some future date, particularly in such areas as vacation orbonus guarantees,” Farrell adds. “You want to make sure you don’tjeopardize the tax status of your qualified plans, but other than that, yourobjective is to ease the individual’s transition, not to play cop.”


Say what you mean. Mean what you say.


In the offer letter, be sure to list anything you’ve already told thecandidate verbally. If you said you’d offer stock options, a stock-optionpackage should be included.


The rule is: Even if you neglect to put it in writing, your word can beconstrued as an implied promise. Candidates can later argue (in court if theyhave to) that anything you said during the “courting” phase of theemployment relationship is an implied and binding “contract.” Thatmeans, if you don’t mean to offer it as an enticement in the first place, makesure that no one in human resources or any of the hiring managers implies thatthere’s something that will be offered that eventually isn’t.


According to the Smart Workplace Practices newsletter (published by Employersof America in Mason City, Iowa) on the topic of job offers, the real dangers ofthe offer letter happen in one of these ways: either by being construed as acontract, by containing unintentional promises, or the letter conflicts withwhat the candidate was told during the interview.


“The frightening fact is this: Letters determined to contain acontractual agreement and letters containing no contractual agreement are forthe most part indistinguishable,” the Smart Workplace Practices newsletterstates. That’s why you should refer to the letter as a “statement ofunderstanding” rather than a letter of employment. This way, it sounds lesslegal and not so much like a contract.


It’s a matter of delivery.


Once you’ve got the letter written, how will you send it? There are as manyopinions as there are methods, but perhaps these guidelines will help.


One human resources professional at a media organization says she hase-mailed offers to candidates in a password-protected document. Either thepassword was hinted at in the e-mail or the candidate was told to call for thepassword. The document is sent in such a way so that the candidate can’tchange the content of the offer letter. Adds Bob Gately, president of GatelyConsulting based in Hopedale, Massachusetts: “All e-mail correspondence,such as offers, should be followed by written letters of confirmation until thecourts speak with one voice on the issue of e-mails as binding contracts.”


“If they’d like to fax back the agreement, fine,” says Konstan.”But, of course, a hard copy must be mailed in or delivered to me forbackup of signature.”


The offer letter, although it’s the first step in closing the deal, is notthe final say. There’s usually more to negotiate. It’s important to know howto bargain so each side wins.


Grab a Seat at the Negotiating Table


An offer letter is the first step in formalizing an employment deal. The nextstep is negotiating the terms. While there’s a small percentage of candidateswho inevitably will accept an offer “as is,” the largest percentage ofprospective hires realize the letter on the table is only the first step incoming to an agreement.


Many candidates will negotiate — and negotiate with a vengeance. And in thistight employment market — considered an employees’ market — they often havethe upper hand.


Here are some ideas on how to negotiate for the best talent, while doling outyour firm’s valuable resources in moderation — and where you get the biggestbang for your buck.


Negotiation is a two-way street.


Some human resources managers feel they have to make the first offer letter”perfect.” The big news is: It doesn’t have to be. Although theoffer letter certainly should state everything the company intends to offerinitially, it should always leave room for negotiation. So expect candidates atthis stage to ask for what they really want. Then be prepared to listencarefully. “It’s OK to make the offer a two-way conversation,” saysFirla. “Obviously the employer leads off with a good, solid offer, but askilled negotiator understands what others’ needs are and weaves those intothe [negotiation] process as much as possible.”


Make it a win-win


Any good negotiations will result in a win-win. “We need to makecandidates feel like they won, or at least got something extra as a result ofthe discussion. This is where a good relationship starts, or falters,”Firla adds.


“I tend to take a far more flexible approach these days, often puttingout feelers: (‘Our typical package would offer you x’) and then listeningcarefully for a response,” explains Ronnie Grabon, vice president, humanresources for jewelry retailer Carlyle & Co., based in Greensboro, NorthCarolina. With this strategy, he explains that sometimes the person accepts andsometimes he or she asks for more specific items such as a laptop (especially ifthe person’s a ‘techie’) or more time off. “I then work from theredepending on what we can do within guidelines. I generally have found this towork, but managers making these types of offers need to be carefully trained intheir limits and on how to negotiate.”


Grabon cautions that this strategy has backfired on occasion when workingwith an applicant who has a number in mind (especially a yearly salary figure)and has no interest in looking at all factors. “The basic principles hereare based upon the getting to ‘yes,’ by expanding the box onnegotiating,” says Grabon.


It’s important to remember that any negotiations that take place between aprospective employee and the hiring manager or HR, should be in the context ofmutual cooperation. After all, you’re hoping to bring the person on board. Theoffer negotiation process should set the tone for the future businessrelationship. If both sides are willing to give a little, it bodes well forfuture performance and business outcomes


Orientation:


Help Employees Hit the Ground Running


So you’ve offered an applicant the job. You’ve negotiated the deal, andnow the employee is coming on board. It’s true that at this stage, you’vegotten through the toughest part. But now that you’ve committed a great dealof resources into hiring the new employee, you need to ensure that your company’sinvestment in its new hire pays off.


Employee orientation is an often neglected and widely underutilized tool thatcan help your company’s newest recruits get up to speed. After you’ve spentan enormous amount of time finding and wooing the right employees, you can’tafford to drop the ball on day one when your new people show up. This is when agood employee orientation program can help.


Savvy human resources managers are realizing that employee orientation is atraining opportunity that gets people headed in the right direction from thestart. And it’s not just an act of goodwill. It’s smart business.


According to the American Society for Training and Development (ASTD) basedin Alexandria, Virginia, companies that invest in training (such as goodorientation programs) do better over time in market-to-book ratios and in stockmarket values. However, in 1996, only two percent of training budgets weretypically allocated to new employee orientation programs. Understanding today’semployee orientation program goals can give you insight into why they’re soimportant to finalizing the deal with new employees.


It’s more than just a tour


The original purpose for the employee orientation was to “orient”new employees to the company so they would know where things were located andget a brief overview of company operations, procedures and policies. It wasoften short and sweet.


The goals of today’s employee orientation have changed dramatically. Thesedays, the employee orientation process can last from a few minutes to severalmonths, depending on how much the company values the opportunity to show theemployee what the company is all about. The purpose of an orientation programnow includes helping reduce the cost of a new hire by getting him or her up tospeed more quickly; reducing a new employee’s anxiety; reducing new hireturnover; and helping new employees develop realistic job expectations, andtherefore increase job satisfaction especially in the critical first few weeksand months on the job.


New employee orientation is more than a one-day event. In a recent survey byThe Training Clinic, based in Seal Beach, California, 25 percent of thecompanies with a formal program described it as poor or just adequate. The mostcommon complaints heard about new employee orientation are that it isoverwhelming — or just the opposite: Nothing happens and the new employee isleft to sink or swim.


“Successful new employee orientation is an enthusiastic welcome, full ofvariety and timely information,” says Jean Barbazette, president of TheTraining Clinic and author of “Successful New Employee Orientation: Assess,Plan, Conduct and Evaluate Your Program” (Pfeiffer & Co., 1994).”Too many programs,” she contends, “dedicate only one day toorientation-a combination of filling out forms and a tour of the facility.Orientation needs to be a process, not a one-day event.”


The result of an unplanned orientation is often a confused new employee whoisn’t very productive, will probably make mistakes, and is likely to leave theorganization within a year. With the high costs of turnover, and the ongoingtight labor market, that isn’t a pretty prospect.


Types of orientation vary greatly


Often employee orientation programs come in two types: Company overview andjob-specific. The overview orientation usually gives an employee the broaderscope of the company and its operations, and is usually conducted by humanresources.


An example of a typical overview orientation are sessions conducted regularlyby the employee development and training team at the University of California,Berkeley. On the university’s main campus, the team conducts employeeorientations once a month, with a campus orientation (that takes three and ahalf hours), and a benefits orientation (that takes two hours). The team feelsthat the time spent planning for the new employee’s first days and weeks onthe job will greatly increase the chance for a successful start.


The job-specific orientation is usually conducted by a new employee’ssupervisor or team leader. “I like systems where the new employee’smanager is the gatekeeper [for employee orientation.] After all, he or she wasthe one who [hired] the person and who has the greatest vested interest in theperson coming up to speed and feeling comfortable in the environment,” saysHR consultant Joan Farrell.


Other companies, such as Santa Clara, California-based Intel, approachemployee orientation as a competitive advantage. The orientation process for newIntel employees starts before day one with an orientation package that’smailed to the person’s home. HR believes that it’s important to get thebasics out of the way before they arrive, so the real work (a six-month”induction” process) can begin once people start there.


Transmit values


A newer addition to orientation programs is the emphasis companies areplacing on giving employees a clear sense of their values and mission. In fact,it’s so important at some organizations that the company’s CEO often showsup to introduce himself or herself to new employees and kicks off theorientation meeting.


“Yes, it’s expensive to convene people but this is the one opportunitya corporation has to instill corporate values, expectations, and so on, into newemployees,” says Firla. Adds Grabon of Carlyle & Co., “I feel thatorientation is best used as a way of helping employees understand where yourvalues are, how flexible you are, what policies are most important to have themfollow, such as diversity.”


This transmission of values is important for everyone who works at your firm,including part-time or contingent workers. “I thought the orientation wasvery good because the person who was leading the orientation was the departmentdirector. He knew his subject matter very well, and communicated the companypolicies and values, and how they wanted their customers treated,” saysCarole Gallagher, a sales professional who recently started working as afragrance model at a San Diego Nordstrom, a department store chain that’s wellknown for its high quality of customer service.


But whether it was by chance or by design, she was left to figure out someother basic information through her own initiative. “As to the exactspecifics of the job, that was going to be handled by the people I was going tobe working with directly. Unfortunately it wasn’t handled well, it was a busysale day and I felt very much on my own. But by being assertive, I got myquestions answered.”


There’s no substitute for first-line supervisor interaction


HR can help plan the activities, and will still need to do the classicbenefits briefings. But someone from the hiring function should be the one totake the new person around for introductions and to learn the ‘lay of theland.’ Key managers can meet the new player and vice versa through a ‘treasurehunt’ process where the recruit sets up a series of meetings with individualsto garner specific information from them.


“The information should be primarily position-related but can include a‘treasure’ — something personal they need to discover about each of thepeople. It’s a great way to break the ice,” says Farrell.


Online orientation is an option


Some firms are beginning to take care of some employee orientation activitiesto the employee’s desktop. For example, at FedEx, based in Memphis, much ofthe employee orientation and other training is on an interactive trainingplatform. But it’s supplemented with face-to-face time with the new employee’sleader, who covers local elements of the company, including the company’svalues, mission and so on. It’s really important that an employee isn’t justplopped in front of a computer and expected to figure it all out on their own.


“Orientation tends to be tedious and boring as it is,” says NancyProbst, a manager and organizational development consultant of managementadvisory services for Dixon Odom PLLC, a certified public accounting andmanagement advisory firm, based in High Point, North Carolina. “Yet this isthe first chance you have to make a good impression on your new employees. Doesn’tmatch up, does it? I believe orientation is as much a socialization process asit is a way to stuff people full of information they won’t remembertomorrow.”


Whether it was the company strategy, or whether it happened by chance, havingemployees figure out a certain amount of information themselves can be aproductive tactic.


Greet Street, a San Francisco-based, e-mail greeting firm, takes anout-of-the-box approach to orientation — literally. Instead of walking in theirfirst day to find their desk set up with everything they need, new hires walk into find everything in a box — their desk, their computer and even theirtelephone. The first thing workers have to do is set up all their own stuff.During the following two weeks, employees are expected to get to know everyoneelse in the company (all 30 of them) by attending meetings, observing andinteracting.


There’s no substitute for face time


“Orientation is crucial and should bedone in person if possible,” says Firla. That’s a big key to orientation:having a balance between telling employees everything and letting them discoversome information on their own — and also creating a balance between deliveringdry information through reading material (either printed or online), and inperson.


“I still do orientation face-to-face on day one, but I consider it awork in progress for the first six months,” explains Barbara Sterling, HRdirector for Griffin Greenhouse & Nursery Supplies, based in Tewksbury,Massachusetts. Although she manages HR for seven offsite locations, Sterlingsays she always conducts a phone orientation, even if she can’t be there inperson. “In addition to necessary paperwork, I make sure new hires knowwhere the restroom, cafeteria, supply closet and MIS office are, not to mentionlocal restaurants, banks, walk-in clinics, dry cleaners, and places workersfrequent.”


After all, why would a company want to usher in someone they’ve just spenta significant amount of time interviewing and wooing, and then leave them out inthe cold to fend for themselves once they arrive on the job? With the vastnumber of opportunities people have these days to work independently, you haveto assume employees are coming to work with a group of people because that’stheir choice. Make them feel welcome. Inform them. Give them the tools they needto perform well. Then get out of their way so they can dazzle you. Only then canyou consider it a closed deal.


Workforce, December1999, Vol. 78, No. 12, pp. 56-64 — Subscribenow!

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress