Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Before the Ship Sets Sail Global Travel Tips

Before you send employees on international assignments—or even short business excursions—make sure they understand the basic challenges that face anyone traveling to a foreign country.


As many human resources professionals already know, international business travel can be an extremely stressful situation—long hours on an airplane, language differences, currency exchange issues, the logistical nightmare of just finding your destination. Imagine if you’re a less seasoned traveler with no experience in the country you’re visiting. Traveling to a new land just adds to the sense of fatigue of a new assignment—your employees are already stressed, going through different time zones, eating different foods.


Hopefully, you’ve already encouraged your employees to read some travelers’ guides and take time to educate themselves about their new destination. While they’re learning about the country they’ll be visiting, they should also be prepared to know the nuts and bolts of international business travel, safety and health issues.


First and foremost, make sure you obtain the proper documentation to ensure that your employees pass all customs, immigration and visa requirements. In some countries, it can take up to three months or longer just to obtain employment authorization. The visa applications should be one of your first steps in the process. Don’t dillydally and wait until just before your employee’s supposed to leave for his or her new assignment to start worrying about paperwork.


Once that’s behind you, walk your employees through the various travel arrangements, and the health and safety issues upon arrival. Arriving in any destination is a challenge—made even more difficult if you’re traveling to a different country with an entirely different culture. Your company should develop strategies that’ll make the lives of your employees on the road a lot more enjoyable, and eventually more profitable.


Here are tips for you and your travelers.


Try these general travel tips.


  • Always pack small packages of food to carry aboard the airplane. Also, call the airline in advance to ask for special meals, if necessary.
  • It’s a good idea to carry a list of the items your luggage contains in case something is lost or stolen during your trip.
  • Decide whether to buy foreign currency before you leave the U.S. or after you arrive. Take some money in local currency for arrival expenses such as tipping and taxi rides. Take the rest of your money in travelers’ checks.
  • Think about obtaining health, travel and accident insurance coverage—better safe than sorry. Also, be sure to obtain information on medical, legal and professional services, and how to obtain those services in an emergency.
  • Always carry extra copies of your passport photo. They come in handy when you’ve lost your passport or even for an international driver’s permit.
  • Stock up on business cards before you leave.

Take precautions to ensure a safe journey.


  • Before your trip, study the health and safety conditions of the country in which you’ll be staying. This research should include current political conditions, weather, common wildlife, even the crime rate.
  • Leave valuable items at home, including jewelry, cellular phones and unnecessary credit cards.
  • Master the local currency before you do anything that puts your fortune on the line.
  • Ask for an up-to-date map when you arrive in a city and take a reconnaissance walk to get familiar with the city’s feel and your neighborhood. If you’re in a non-English speaking country, jot down the hotel’s name and address.
  • Learn a few key phrases in the host country’s language.
  • Learn about the values of a country, and be aware of how you will fit into that culture in every aspect of your behavior.
  • Register with the U.S. consulate. It will facilitate help if you have an emergency. If you’re working in a country with no U.S. officials, register in an adjacent country, if possible, leaving your itinerary.
  • Find out how the local telephone works. Make a list of addresses and telephone numbers of any local contracts you have—the police, hospitals, consulate.
  • If you’re arrested, ask permission to notify the U.S. consulate.

Protect your health.


  • Some countries require the employee and all family members undergo medical examination as part of the process. Make an appointment with your physician and make sure you’re caught up on all of your vaccinations. Educate yourself about health risks in the country you’re visiting. Immunize yourself to those diseases found in that country.
  • Take copies of all your eyeglass and medical prescriptions, blood type, and so on. Take extra prescription drugs in original containers, and check with that country’s laws to see if those drugs are permissible to bring into the country. Take extra eyeglasses or contact lenses.
  • Remember that the cost of medical evacuation of a sick or injured person is extremely high. A company may have to spend $30,000 to airlift the person to another country that has a medical center or back to the United States, so don’t fudge when it comes to your health.

“Moving to another country is a difficult transition,” says Jeff Davidson, frequent traveler and author of The Joy of Simply Living (Rodale Press, 1999). “In fact, most people are sorely underprepared for it. They have no idea how cut off from their formal world they’re going to feel. If nothing else, make sure you have e-mail access to everyone who counts. It’s a relatively inexpensive way to stay in touch, no matter where you are. Also, every country and city has a Web site that you can visit in advance; print out the pages that matter to you. Many Web sites even have global map capabilities.”


Any company with expatriates should always establish an immigration and travel policy—a handbook, if you will—to help manage your employees’ anxieties and expectations. It will not only go to alleviating a lot of stress, but it can also save you on legal fees and help streamline the entire process. In other words, don’t let the experience ruin your employee’s stay. After all, you never get a second chance to make a first impression.


Global Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 43-44.


Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Motivating and Retaining High-potential Employees With Relocation Services

Finding and keeping key talent is still tough in today’s labor market. That’s why some of the nation’s largest firms have figured out how to link motivational HR programs with resources that help employees. Combined, these resources help employees figure out if a new job in a new location is their best move, and find relocation for the move—meanwhile giving the companies the biggest bang for their buck. Here are three companies’ approaches that have been deemed best practices by Chicago-based consulting firm Arthur Andersen.


Johnson & Johnson
The New Brunswick, New Jersey-based company’s relocation services program is designed to address the major concerns of transferring families, such as obtaining mortgage financing, buying and selling homes, making the moving and transportation arrangements, identifying appropriate schools and helping spouses find new employment. Counseling is also available to help deal with relocation apprehension.


General Electric Co.
GE’s finance organization values diversity of work experience and encourages movement among businesses. Because of the size of the Fairfield, Connecticut-based company’s finance workforce, full-time human resources professionals are available to counsel and coach people about development moves. One effective tool is a career-planning trade-off chart that helps people understand which experiences will develop their abilities and which career moves make sense. Some of the trade-offs include: same business versus new business, field versus corporate and manufacturing versus service. The chart helps individuals see where a move might broaden their experience or where another might not be as advantageous.


Colgate-Palmolive Co.
At New York City-based Colgate, which has operated in 20 countries around the world for more than 50 years, the key development moves are outside the United States, particularly in emerging markets. This is a change from the past, when it was thought that the size of the U.S. market ensured that high-potentials could obtain the necessary experiences without venturing overseas. Despite this new awareness of the global nature of leadership, the company is having difficulty finding high-potentials who are willing to move. To battle this problem, the company is making a strong effort to “raise the profile” of people, accepting development moves in emerging markets in the hopes that their example will inspire other high-potentials to make similar moves. The company also emphasizes that such postings are a prerequisite for major management positions at Colgate.


Source: Global Best Practices, Arthur Andersen, Chicago.


Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 78, No. 3, p. 92.


Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

How to Build a Better Recruiting Process

Workforce talked with Reginald Barefield, who’s the interim HR director for Humana, about recruitment as a strategic business function.


Your recruiting infrastructure incorporates leading-edge technology. How large a part do you believe technology plays in today’s recruiting process?
Technology helps you move more swiftly and helps reduce your costs—but it’s not the Holy Grail. If you don’t have the recruiters or the recruiting organization of people—who have the right mindset of how to use technology, how to make the behavioral changes necessary and how to track productivity standards—you’re going to fail.


What’s the biggest mistake you see companies make in terms of using technology for their recruitment?
They house all the resumes in a system, but then hire individuals already in their database through search firms. The recruiters or HR people just don’t have the time to search the databases.


How does a company remedy this?
You need an infrastructure in place. I built the technology to generate leads and import them into the database because I don’t want recruiters to have to spend time surfing the Internet. And then I have recruitment coordinators who support the recruiters by making travel arrangements, conducting background checks and drug screens and so on. It’s all how you structure your organization. And then you put some performance standards in place to manage the recruiters, manage the recruitment coordinators who support them and hold them accountable.


Other than having the proper recruiting infrastructure in place, what else is critical to improve the recruiting process?
I look at recruiting as a sales and marketing function. The recruiters’ product is the company. To sell the company, they need the culture, the environment, the HR practices, the leadership training and all of those things being conducive to attracting people to the organization.


How can recruiters work with other areas of HR to ensure the culture is what it should be?
Recruiters keep abreast of what’s going on at other companies because they’re looking into why it’s more difficult to recruit people from particular organizations than others. So we can be the deliverers of ideas and suggestions of how to retain more people.


How important is having dedicated recruiters today?
Oh, it’s a must. Yesterday, when unemployment was high, most organizations didn’t have recruiting specialists; it wasn’t necessary. They had lots of applicants walking through the door. Those days are gone. Today, you’re lucky to get two qualified candidates apply. So companies have to go back and assess and audit their current processes. Can an HR generalist really do it? No. They have to build a staffing organization that solely concentrates on staffing. If they don’t, they will need to rely on search firms at a higher cost. Smart companies today have recruiting teams proactively recruiting within a timely manner.


Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 78, No. 3, p. 40.


Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Organizational Transformation Takes Strategy, Patience and a Lot of Listening

Workforce talked with John Sloan, senior vice president of human resources for Sears, Roebuck and Co., about the HR function and Sears’ transformation process over he past several years. The highlights:

What is the toughest part of your job?
The toughest part is trying to manage a workforce of our size. We’re about the 8th largest company in the United States. Trying to respond to an extremely large and diverse workforce in which people have different needs and desires, and trying to listen to and accommodate those differences for a workforce our size is always a challenge.

Why do you think the HR team at Sears is a unique and good place to be?
We have a vital part in the overall success of our company. We sit at the table with the most senior executives of the organization. All our HR people are a vital link between the human element and the business element of Sears. We provide a conduit between our employees and their needs and desires, and the company’s overall success. We’re actively involved in managing the company, which I think is extremely exciting.

What impact do you think today’s HR professionals can have on business?
I think they play a vital role in ensuring the strategic direction of a company. HR maps out those issues that are critical from both a human element, as well as a business element, and tying the two together.

What advice do you have for other HR professionals who are going through an organizational transformation?
First, be sure that you listen to your employees. The people on the front lines are the ones closest to the customer. They can give you outstanding advice. Then take aggressive action to respond to those needs and interests. Also have the patience to realize that changing an organizational culture doesn’t happen overnight.

Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 78, No. 3, p. 28.

Posted on March 1, 1999

Send Your Expats Prepared for Success

Send Your Expats Prepared for Success

Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

1999 Global Outlook Optimas Award Profile Molex Inc.

The cover of Molex Inc.’s 1998 annual report boasts: “Everywhere, Anywhere.” It’s a declaration that speaks volumes about what this 60-year-old manufacturer is all about. It’s a company that’s truly global—having taken to heart the idea that no matter where the customers are based, Molex can serve them. Although based in Lisle, Illinois (a suburb of Chicago), the $1.6 billion firm operates 49 manufacturing facilities in 21 countries and employs 13,000 people worldwide. However, only 4,500 of them are located in Molex’s U.S. divisions. The rest are local nationals.


Molex makes more than 100,000 kinds of electronic, electrical and fiber-optic connectors and switches used in the electrical systems of cars, computers, household appliances, medical equipment, office electronics and other products. Its products are delivered to customers in more than 50 countries around the world. Despite the fact that the company produces technology that helps enable people to interact from anywhere, Molex has developed a culture that places high importance on human interaction and communications.


Molex adopted a global mindset early on.
Molex has a truly global outlook. The company established an international division in 1967, opening its first plant in Japan in 1970 and a plant in Ireland in 1971. Today, nearly 70 percent of Molex’s sales come from outside the United States and 46 percent of its sales are to Asia. In 1998, its sales by region were 40.1 percent in the Americas, 21.8 percent in Europe, 20.2 percent in the Far East North and 17.9 percent in the Far East South. “This broad flexibility, combined with a strong balance sheet, enabled us to continue to invest aggressively in tooling new products, improving our equipment and serving our customers—even in countries experiencing major economic problems, such as Korea, Malaysia and Thailand,” wrote Frederick A. Krehbiel, Molex’s chairman of the board and CEO, and John H. Krehbiel, Jr., president and COO, in the firm’s 1998 annual report.


Because it’s global, the firm’s senior management team can shift operational emphasis from one area of the world to another when economic downturns happen, while investing in the future. For example, even though 1998 was a bad year in the Asian region, Molex still invested in its operations there by refurbishing the cafeteria in Malaysia and installing air conditioning in the warehouses. It continued to expand and invest in factories and equipment in Asia for new products.


“Our philosophy of boosting investments and sharpening our edge during rough times has greatly contributed to our moving from the 10th largest connector company in 1980 to the second largest today,” the Krehbiels wrote in the annual report. During the 1990s, Molex more than doubled its global manufacturing capacity. It recently opened factories in China and Puerto Rico.


Last year, despite having experienced many challenges, the company achieved record sales and profits, growing 5.4 percent during the period. Company managers consider this respectable performance since two of the company’s four regions were affected by very difficult economic conditions and the PC industry, the largest end-market they serve, experienced weakness.


People-focused goals elevate HR.
The company’s four corporate goals, which have been in place for many years, are to provide good customer service, to fully develop its human resources, to build a truly global company and to meet or exceed financial goals. “The way I’ve always looked at Molex is, there’s only four corporate goals and two of them have to do with people,” explains Malou Roth, vice president of human resources for corporate training and development who has been with the company for 15 years helping develop the firm’s global HR commitment. Every employee has an HR-related element tied to his or her performance goals.


The company goals have been translated into the languages of all employees worldwide and put on posters. “Rating goals and having posters and putting them up all over the world is all fine and good, but if you don’t help people execute them or interpret them, then all they are is posters,” says Roth. Molex tries to make the goals come alive for its workforce, and its human resources team has a big hand in making that happen.


Notice we didn’t say global HR team. Molex was one of the first U.S.-based firms to do away with the concept of a domestic and international title for HR staff. The assumption was: What’s domestic if you’re a global organization? This is the kind of attitude that pervades the business.


As the primary global HR coordinator, Roth declares her philosophy that when you’re running an international company, you really can’t—or shouldn’t—expect to have the same HR policies and programs all over the world. HR actually is the most localized of all the functions. “If you’re looking at engineering, quality, manufacturing, finance, legal or other functions, HR is the one that’s the most country-specific,” says Roth. “Everybody usually thinks it’s the opposite.


“What I tried to do when I came to Molex 15 years ago was take the basic HR programs and practices that I knew were good ones and make those things standards or consistent practices at every entity in every country,” says Roth. Molex calls each of its business units an “entity.” Each operation worldwide is a separate company. “But of course, they’re all little baby companies of Mother Molex,” says Roth. “There were certain things everybody had to do to be part of the Molex family.”


For example, as Molex grew rapidly during the ’80s, Roth made sure every new unit did the same things: have an employee manual with policies and practices in writing, new employee orientation, salary administration with a consistent grading system, written job descriptions, written promotion and grievance procedures, performance appraisals—all the basic HR stuff. “Now, that may sound really boring, but it isn’t when you’re starting up a company or taking over a company and it doesn’t have that sort of thing,” says Roth. She found that a lot of companies in other countries never had such materials available to them. All the materials were translated into the languages of the countries in which Molex had operations. Managers were free to question anything or suggest changes to materials. However, few did. Most were happy to have human resources guidelines and they worked well from the beginning.


Other entities can add to the programs and be creative with them, but they have to implement minimum HR standards. Roth says, “It’s really a matter of: Are the basics in place and are they working?” Kathi Regas, corporate VP of HR for Molex, adds: “Our global HR Practices in training and communications helps us build on the strong foundation we have—a common way of managing our employees, strengthening their skills, and improving service to our customers both locally and globally.”


Yet each local unit has unique needs, so the philosophy for hiring HR staff internationally has been to hire experienced HR professionals from other companies in the same country in which they have operations. Roth figures you need to hire people who know the language, have credibility, know the law and know how to recruit. “You can’t transfer someone in to do that,” says Roth. “You can transfer a controller or a quality guy in from someplace else because those operations are much more standardized—but HR isn’t.” There are 80 HR staff members in 17 countries where Molex operates.


Having guidelines and policies in place is also important because when you hire HR managers from other companies, like Intel or IBM, you run the risk of having them want to implement the same types of policies from their former firms. While you can get good ideas from new blood, you have to protect the investment you’ve made in forming a culture and your company’s way of doing things.


Sending employees to work elsewhere.
Part of the Molex philosophy about being global is to have many people moving around the company’s operations worldwide to learn from each other. For example, last year, the company continued with the rollout of the Molex Global Information System (GIS), a system that will connect all company operations around the world through a single communications link. When fully implemented, the GIS will give the firm a tool for integrating technology, manufacturing, marketing and administrative systems across all regions. It also will be year 2000 compliant and euro capable. The team that has been implementing the system has comprised employees from Molex locations worldwide. “In this case, having people from everywhere working on the system has made the expense of the project go way up, but it’s been incredibly beneficial for the overall project because it has really been a worldwide effort,” says Roth.


Molex has five categories of “expats”—people who work outside their home country:


  1. Regular expats live in a country other than their home for three- to five-year assignments. There are approximately 50 of these expats on assignment at any given time.
  2. Inpats are workers who come to work at the company’s Lisle headquarters from another country.
  3. Third country nationals (TCNs) are people who go from one Molex entity to another—for example, someone who goes from Singapore to Taiwan.
  4. Short-termers are people who go to a Molex entity in another country for a short time, such as for six to nine months.
  5. Medium-termers undertake a project somewhere other than their home office that may take 12 to 24 months.

For a medium-size company, having so much worldwide employee movement is unusual—and costly. If you consider that an employee making a $75,000 salary costs about a quarter of a million dollars in total costs as an expatriate, sending 60 employees from site to site each year is an expensive undertaking. “But we feel it’s really worthwhile because there’s nothing like living and working with people outside your home country to make you understand you’re really in something bigger than Molex Japan or Molex Germany,” explains Roth. Adds Regas: “Our investment in expatriates is critical to building the strong foundation we have of sharing our expertise with each other. It’s important for us to respect individual cultures while maintaining Molex’s unique global culture.”


Specialized communications are vital for a global workforce.
As one way to maintain the culture, every Molex entity worldwide has to conduct bimonthly communications meetings. They’re top-down communications blitzes that bring people up to speed on what’s going on in that particular Molex unit. Usually the HR manager kicks off the meeting, and then the general manager or sales manager speaks. They’ve often had Molex clients and customers come in and speak about why quality is important to them. Engineers will come in to explain new products.


Meetings always begin with sales figures and new customer prospects, and between meetings, sales figures are posted for all to see. These meetings take no more than an hour per group. But for larger Molex entities, such as the one in Singapore, employees attend the meetings in groups of approximately 100 at a time, so the meetings can take more than a day and a half to complete.


Molex also does annual communication meetings, which include the company’s chairman, the COO, the executive vice president, the corporate VP of HR and the VP of HR, in addition to other senior executives of the local entity and the region. They spend a day at each location touring the factory, looking at new equipment and facilities and meeting with employees. “Our annual communications meetings ensure that our employees know they’re a part of something much bigger than their local entities,” says Regas. “They know our history, our performance, and our plans for the future. This, combined with frequent contact among our employees from entities around the world and common practices, helps maintain our culture and strengthen a global team of employees.”


Molex may be on to something. Wrote Dennis R. Briscoe in his book, International Human Resource Management (Prentice Hall, 1995): “In the end, this merger of the cultural aspects of international businesses boils down to finding ways for individuals with varying backgrounds and perspectives to work together; that is, finding ways to develop a corporate ‘glue’ that will hold the organization effectively together.”


The tough part is figuring out how to do that in such a way that maximizes the energy of individuals throughout a company’s global operations, while limiting the financial barriers that inevitably result from transporting individuals from one place to another. Molex seems to have figured out a workable formula for maximizing its return on the global workforce investment and spreading the talent. As the back of the company’s 1998 annual report states: “Molex: Bringing People & Technology Together, Worldwide.” The slogan has dual meaning for both customers and employees. It certainly isn’t a bad goal to strive for.


Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 42-46.


Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

IOn the Contrary-I Let Go of Bad Habits

I was one of those pathologically shy kids who never spoke in class and was terrified by show and tell. (I always showed.) Even saying “here” during roll call was enough to make me want to drop out of school altogether. Fortunately, by avoiding drama and never volunteering to be the captain of anything, I was able to escape the slow death known as public speaking.


That is, until the 8th grade, when a sadistic teacher thought it would be great fun for students to give oral presentations. In the midst of my demonstration on how to make lemonade from scratch, my knobby 13-year-old hands started to shake so violently that I accidentally knocked the bowl of fresh lemon juice off the demonstration table onto the floor, drenching the front of my new plaid jumper in the process. Quickly bending over to retrieve the bowl, I then whacked my head on the edge of the table. All I can remember from that point on is wondering whether or not the government’s witness protection program accepted teenagers.


While the entire fiasco probably lasted less than a minute, the mental reruns tormented me throughout puberty. Lesson learned: I was simply too inept to be an effective public speaker. Over the last few years, I’ve ditched the plaid jumper and worked to overcome my fear of public speaking. Ironically, the biggest challenge has not been learning how to speak in public, but forgetting how I once felt about it.


The key to moving on is to forget.
You see, forgetting is an important part of the learning process that most people, well, forget about. Instead, we hoard knowledge like nervous little rodents squirreling away nuts before a snowstorm. Stuffed with information that’s no longer relevant, we become immobilized in the face of new challenges. We rely on what we know to be true, instead of trying something different. But just because something worked or didn’t work before doesn’t mean it will work or not work in exactly the same way again. To innovate, change and grow, we need to spend as much time forgetting as we do learning. We need to get rid of outdated information and create room for new ideas to take root.


The ability to forget is especially important for corporate HR professionals. To become business leaders in a constantly changing, knowledge-based economy, HR professionals have to learn to let go. As management guru Tom Peters says, “You can’t live without an eraser.” In his book, The Circle of Innovation (Alfred A. Knopf Inc., 1997), Peters explains that although organizational learning is a hot topic, organizational forgetting is even more important. “Not to focus on forgetting is a mistake … perhaps mistake number one for your division, your unit and for you,” he says.


By my calculation, there are three things HR should try to forget about.


  1. Forget programs. I was lurking around the Internet and read a post from someone looking for ideas on a “program to put more fun in the workplace.” Among the programs suggested were a “weekly milk-and-cookie break” and a “quarterly event with senior executives.” Whoa—are we really ready to have that much fun at work? Excuse my naiveté, but isn’t fun supposed to happen spontaneously? When did fun become something you do between 3:00 and 3:30 every other Thursday in the cafeteria? If you want to have fun, you have to be fun. You lead by example, not mandate. To the extent possible, HR should forget the idea of solving problems with structured programs. Sometimes it’s better to point people in the right direction and let them develop their own solutions.
  2. Forget policies. The other day, I overheard one HR person telling another that she was in the midst of developing a policy on open communication. Is it just me, or does this seem counterintuitive? If you’re seeking open communication, does it really make sense to spell out what open communication is, when it will occur and how the company regards it? Policies are like the New Year’s resolutions of Corporate America. They’re well intentioned, but doomed to make people fatter and more miserable than they were previously. Communication and leadership come from actions, not resolutions.
  3. Forget what everybody else is doing. The best practices movement has been a great way for managers to learn about effective workplace initiatives at other companies. But it also has created a generation of HR professionals who can’t write an employee handbook without first finding out how others have gone about it. In today’s competitive marketplace, profits go to the fastest, most innovative employers—not to those who copy their neighbors. Forget the other guy and focus on what your employees need to succeed.

It takes a lot of concentration to forget old ways of doing things, but it can be done. Whenever I’m about to deliver a presentation, I take a deep breath and look to the heavens for divine intervention. I’m not picky. A power outage, tornado or stroke would all be acceptable means of avoiding public speaking. Catching myself, I take a step back and force myself to remember the benefits I’ve gotten from public speaking. It takes some effort, but it gets me to the lectern every time. Best of all, I’ve yet to hit my head on it.


Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 78, No. 3, p. 19-20.


Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Volunteerism Bolsters Employee Commitment

Workforce spoke with Tom Nides, senior vice president of human resources, about Fannie Mae’s work/life initiatives for employees, and its outreach programs for the community. The highlights:


Do you feel people actually come to work for Fannie Mae because of its work/life initiatives and its outreach programs?
It’s a combination of those things, yes. But everything flows from our corporate mission statement to put low- and moderate-income people in houses. We’re also practical in our understanding that every individual employee has his or her own needs, and we have a reputation in Corporate America for addressing those needs. Consequently, when people come to us for jobs, the first thing they ask about is our benefits programs. We try to provide the whole smorgasbord of benefits for our employees, and also to use those programs as recruiting tools to bring new employees into the company.


Why all this time, money and effort on corporate social responsibility when employee loyalty is tenuous, at best?
Our turnover is well below 10 percent, which is terrific for a financial service company. We don’t buy into the proposition that employees aren’t loyal. People want roots; they want to feel a part of a company. If you can give them a reason to stay, they’ll stay. People leave all the time, sure, but we find good business for us is keeping our employees here. We spend thousands and thousands of dollars training each and every employee for the sole purpose to keep them here. The longer they’re here, the more they understand the company and that makes for a better employee, and ultimately a better company.


You grant 10 hours paid leave per month for volunteer work. How has this impacted the company’s bottom line?
It’s had no measurable impact on revenues, but then I would argue it’s hard to measure these things. On the other hand, we’ve been pleasantly surprised by how well these programs are received by our employees. We’ve probably had upwards of 30 percent employee participation, and we’ve just come off a phenomenal year.


Why is it important that employees balance their work and home lives?
For instance, if employees know their company is willing to help them when there’s a family health-care crisis, then they’ll want to come to work and they’ll stay focused on their work. A lot of our employees have children, and they think it’s terrific that we encourage them to volunteer at their children’s schools. We want our employees to know they need to balance work and family because if they’re not happy at home, they won’t be happy at work.


Do you believe the profitability and viability of a company depends on its ability to gain the confidence, support and trust of its employees and their families, as well as the community?
It’s our number one issue. If you don’t have the loyalty of your employees, then you have a company that’s not on the cutting edge. Our employees like to come here. We have a company that’s relatively small by number, but large in capital. Consequently, we need to count on a small number of people to do an enormous amount of work. We want them motivated and fired up to come to work.


Have you been able to track a link between your efforts to be a neighbor to the community and enhanced employee productivity?
This isn’t a complete science, but we survey our employees every 18 months. We really care about what they think. We’ve tried to find out what motivates them. This much is clear: The things we do for the community as they relate to our corporate mission—building houses, getting involved in volunteer programs—are very much part of what people respond to at Fannie Mae. To me, our employees believe this company is committed to our programs in the communities and that makes them feel better. We believe our employees are happy about working here, and consequently their productivity is linked to their happiness.


Have you developed any fresh perspectives about corporate-community relationships?
We’ve decided that what communities really want is bricks and mortar, not a lot of mumbo-jumbo or fancy press releases. They want real buildings. So we’ve decided to focus on cities in tangible ways. People want things they can touch and feel, and we believe that’s what we can provide. We’ve decided to play that role in cities by bringing builders, realtors and community groups together, and then providing some of the money to make a difference in the community. People want real money and real progress. And that’s been our focal point from day one.


Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 78, No. 3, p. 70.


Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Do More Than Make a Move

We all know the really important thing people do at work to prepare for a relocation: find sturdy boxes. The copier room is a gold mine of cardboard. But how else can companies assist employees relocate besides helping them pack up their belongings?


Relocation, by nature, is a confusing, emotional and expensive procedure for the migrating employee. Although recent market trends show relocating homeowners may have an easier time selling their, that’s only one element of the move. Since there’s much attention being placed on relocation, perhaps now is a good time to reinforce the internal communications that bolster it.


Having supporting roles in relocation, recruiters need to convince people to make a move in the first place, and operations managers need to get the people up to productivity in their new jobs. HR is in a position at which it can facilitate both groups of professionals. By helping educate recruiters and operations managers about what the recruits or transferees really need with respect to relocation, HR has the opportunity to improve the process both in its early and later stages. These two particular areas are crucial to employees’ comfort with a move.


 


 


Each employee’s expectations are unique.
Market conditions may make it easier for employees to sell their houses, but it still doesn’t mean they won’t refuse to relocate, because there are more important matters at hand than housing. According to the January 1999 issue of Mobility magazine, Washington, D.C.-based Employee Relocation Council’s (ERC’s) monthly publication, family or spousal issues account for 72 percent of relocation and recruiting refusals. As the people who entice new hires and transferees to relocate, recruiters are the first people that employees come to trust in the move toward the new environment. HR should communicate with recruiters about ways they can better meet employees’ needs.


One way recruiters help employees overcome doubts about moving is to show them the company will go the extra mile to help them. “Providing a real estate broker who’s experienced in relocation will show how interested you are in them and how valued they are by the company,” says Sandy Christensen, vice president of relocation for Northern Trust Company, a financial service corporation in Chicago. But recruiters have to be flexible with the application of relo services—recognizing some employees need more help (or different kinds of help) than others.


Of course, flexibility doesn’t imply a free-for-all. There should be a consistent flow and policy of the basic relocation procedure. The point is to make sure the policy is flexible enough to include special needs. “We have a basic policy to address the issues that come up,” says Bill Agopian, HR consultant for Torrance, California-based Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. “But one thing you come to realize when you work with many relocations is that there’s a uniqueness to everybody who moves. It’s easy to sit and make a policy and say, ‘This should cover everything’—but there’s always a unique circumstance for each person.” Dual-income homes, elder care, special education, and no prior relocation experience all count.


By having the employee fill out a survey that reveals what he or she expects from the relocation—or simply by asking—recruiters can determine what benefits would be most valuable. From the very first meeting with the person, or even the first phone screen, recruiters should be feeling out what, if any, are his or her concerns about relocating. Determine what’s special about that particular employee’s lifestyle that may need support.


And as recruiters should know how to be flexible with relo services, they also should know when enough is enough. “Don’t go overboard,” warns Christensen. “Be cautious in offering all of the policy provisions during the initial offer. There’s a point at which a company has done all it can do, and there may be personal problems that the company can’t resolve.” If there’s someone who isn’t satisfied with the help that’s available, don’t push too hard because he or she is probably unhappy about moving in the first place.


Most importantly, recruiters must be honest about what life is like at the new location. Throughout the process, the relocatee must have a clear account of living conditions at the new location—not a smokescreen of all the things that won’t be affected by the move. Debunk the thought that relo benefits are a cure-all for the difficulties of moving, or that they will exactly duplicate current living situations.


Another good idea that will help employees prepare for the change is to be sure recruiters understand the potentially wide cost-of-living differences between an employee’s point of origin and the destination. Give specific examples of the price of things like groceries and gasoline. “I’ve had to go to various sources to get accurate information to educate the prospective employee on what reality is versus what he or she has read or heard ‘through the grapevine,’” says Christensen. “[Recruiters] should know what the expense and his or her involvement will be in the hiring and relocation process so that he or she can get the employee productive as soon as possible.”


Remind managers that relocation is very emotional.
Once an employee actually starts his or her relocation assignment, everyone breathes a big sigh of relief because the objective of the relocation is over and done—the employee is at the new location, starting the new job, not to mention the bulk of the expenses have already been paid. Unfortunately, this relief may cause disregard of other issues.


One post-move problem is the inadequate amount of time employees have between the move and starting work. As if packing and moving one’s belongings weren’t difficult enough, some employees have little time to situate themselves or even to unpack because of pressing work concerns. And those are just the effects at home. At work, there are people to meet, a new environment to become accustomed to and other tasks to take on. HR can break this stress by discussing these issues with the operations manager at the new location.


“Operations managers often expedite the process of getting the employee at the new location, on the job and productive in a relatively short turnaround time,” says Ann Cox, director of corporate relocation services for The Paxton Companies, an agent for Atlas Van Lines that services national corporate clients for relocating employees. “As [speed] often is the focus, details may be overlooked or last-minute relocation expenses need to be incurred.”


HR can help avoid these mistakes by reminding operations managers of the importance of understanding relocation procedures and the emotional impact they have on employees. “Understanding that transition time for each employee will be different would be a start,” says Cox, who also stresses that operations managers need to be sensitive to the process. “They often belittle the need to ‘coddle’ the employee during transition, assuming he or she will be resilient and adjust.” Again, allowing flexibility applies.


Though the decision to relocate is a change that’s based on one’s profession, the emotional adjustment may spill into work hours. Be sure managers are giving employees the assistance needed to make the adjustment. Availability to answer questions they may have is a good step, building trust between the employee and manager. “Though Toyota is a big company, we internally try to operate small and try to keep in touch with people,” says Agopian. “We try to have those avenues open so people can ask questions.”


Furthermore, managers can periodically follow up with the employee for the first three months after the move, or assign a mentor. Cox suggests the best candidate to mentor the new hire or transferee is a person who already has experienced relocation. Following along those lines at Toyota, Agopian says, “Most of our managers themselves have been through the [relocation] process, so they’ll understand if you need more than a day to go house-hunting or need time to close a deal. Whatever our people can do to support the transferee, we want to encourage that.”


So just because the market makes housing expenses easier to handle, don’t slip into being neglectful of other points during the transition. “Recruiters and managers often get bogged down with the details of timing or the money surrounding relo, and forget that people have set habits and a pattern of living,” says Cox. “The comfort of those habits are what dictate the reluctance or lack thereof to relocate.” Adds Northern Trust’s Christensen: “HR’s biggest role is to maintain the momentum of the move and settling-in process for the employee.” Both recruiters and operations managers can be reminded of how they can make relocation easier for employees. By improving communications between them, HR can show that your place of employment isn’t just a good place to find boxes.


Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 95-97.


Posted on March 1, 1999July 10, 2018

Culture Drives Knowledge Sharing

Mark Koskiniemi ,V.P. of HR, for Buckman Laboratories shares his insights with HR colleagues:


How did you get into the HR field?
I started out in sales, but my background is actually in chemical engineering. I was a salesman in the coating and plastics division for five years. Then I wanted to come into the lab and [generate] new product development. I got that opportunity while working as lab manager for a while before moving into research and development. After a little shake up in the organization, I got a phone call from the chairman asking if I wanted to be vice president of HR. I said, “Really?” I’ve only been in HR for three years.


What’s the greatest challenge in getting people to share?
Getting everyone to recognize that knowledge is power only when it makes things happen at the point of generating cash flow. There are obviously some technical challenges, but the biggest ones are attitudinal.


So how do you combat resistance?
By highlighting the “wins” associated with sharing. We’ve done this by promoting and publishing examples of how the system can be very beneficial. Also, by keeping the issue in front of all of us through proactive top management support.


Do you think this concept is doable for organizations of all sizes and industries?
Yes. The key thing to remember is to focus your attention on the point in the organization where the cash flow is generated. In our case, this was with our field associates who work with our customers. In other companies, there may be some other critical point at which the value of having the complete power of the organization available would be preferred. So the ability of a company to effectively put knowledge sharing in place would start with its ability to identify where the greatest impact would be.


How much time does this take for HR to set up?
HR’s role as culture guardian is to make sure that as these changes are being made, the people issues (new roles, responsibilities, expectations) are attended to in alignment with our core values. It wasn’t just in the set up of the Knowledge Transfer Department, but in the definition of roles for job descriptions such as the section leaders.


What advice do you have for colleagues who want to shift into a knowledge-sharing system?
Make sure that you work on the culture first. If you make the big investment in technology and the culture isn’t there, somebody will question why you spent the money.


Workforce, March 1999, Vol. 78, No. 3, p. 34.


Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 510 Page 511 Page 512 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress