Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Diverse Workforce Requires Balanced HR Leadership

The human resources department is often called upon to lead the way when companies commit to managing or valuing diversity. The problem is that there are as many ways to approach the task of putting together a diversity initiative as there are companies trying-and there really are no absolutes because of all the variables.


Organizations come in all sizes and shapes, with staffs ranging from mostly homogeneous to totally diverse. In addition, the concepts involved in diversity management are new enough that even its practitioners don’t always have a consensus. Some guidelines have emerged, however, based on what has (and has not) worked for many of these organizations.


The human resources department can be the catalyst that finds and develops opportunities and resources that support the company’s diversity program. Human resources is the researcher that gathers the comprehensive information the organization will need to develop an effective initiative. The department may be the most effective advocate for the program, using a sort of “shuttle diplomacy” between departments, upper management, the diversity task force, and different employee groups to ensure that the intent and benefits of the initiative are well understood.


In the same way, human resources can be a problem-solver. They find funding sources, for example, and make sure that the staff has enough time to attend diversity task force meetings. The department will often be called upon to be a facilitator, a valuable-if challenging-role, since many of the task force participants will not have the necessary skills to communicate across cultures or genders. Human resources, appropriately, may be called upon to demonstrate communication techniques and open safe channels of interaction.


Finally, human resources is an influencer, wise to the political climate of the organization and able to use this knowledge to protect and nurture the fledgling diversity program. Human resources supports the efforts of all participants, and thinks strategically, ever careful to include long-term as well as short-term goals into the overall planning.


To avoid mistakes, false starts and frustrations, it is also helpful to understand what the role of human resources should not be. It is not, for example, desirable for the human resources department to be the sole, or even primary, focus of the diversity strategy.


Dealing effectively with diversity-learning not just to manage, but to thrive on the rich mosaic of differences-is an issue for all areas of the organization. If efforts to manage diversity are seen as “just another human resources program” (either a one-time event or affirmative action with a new name), they will not work.


What is required is real change-in attitudes, practices, structure and policies-from the executive suite down. The human resources manager should not be the sole person responsible for driving the diversity initiative. Companies must spread out the responsibility, or the program may die early.


Many organizations have used the following five steps as a basic framework for setting up successful diversity initiatives:


  1. Create a diversity task force.
    A diversity task force can provide the leadership, focus and continuity to direct your company’s diversity effort. Frequently, its first order of business will be to create a “vision” or mission statement that reflects the organization’s goals in beginning the diversity program.

    Human resources will often be responsible for putting this task force together. Here are some pointers: Involve a broad cross section of employees when choosing group members; selected people should represent different races, genders, ages, sexual orientations and physical abilities. Involve individuals from different levels and departments within the organization, as well as people with expertise and those with basic knowledge of diversity issues.

    Publicize the task force’s purpose and focus to attract members. Explain what will be expected of them and talk about the benefits of both of serving on the task force and the ultimate improvements expected for the company as a whole. Human resources will probably need to facilitate early meetings, helping the group define responsibilities.

    The task force should focus most of its time and energy on putting together a strategy for way to connect the initiative with other business goals. A well-designed and well-implemented cultural audit will provide the information the task force needs to meet its goals.
  2. Design a cultural audit.

    When properly designed and administered, the cultural audit will identify an organization’s strengths, climate, issues, understanding, obstacles and challenges. The audit might suggest possible starting points for the diversity initiative, help assess training needs or identify legal issues.

    Throughout the process, the audit will draw on a broad spectrum of people from throughout the organization. The design should include both qualitative data (from focus groups and interviews), and quantitative information (from surveys).

    A cultural audit provides the empirical data that can suggest future directions and actions to take. Its goal is to provide a diversity “climate” overview, enabling leaders and trainers to understand all issues and concerns. As clearly as possible, the audit strives to tell your organization where it is now.

    The first step in the process is to write an “inventory survey” tailored to the organization’s culture and needs. This survey will generate data useful in developing the strategic plan for diversity. It should be answered anonymously by a representative cross section of employees or, if time permits, by everyone in the organization.

    Focus groups are the next step, comprised of four to six people with a common trait. For example, there could be a focus group of older workers, one of night-shift workers, one of women. These focus groups will provide insights into how each separate group views the questions or situations proposed to them. Deep-seated organizational issues can often be revealed by contrasting the responses of the various groups.

    Individual interviews can probe more deeply into the way people perceive diversity within their organization. Thirty minutes is enough time to allow for this one-on-one phase. Open-ended questions work best. The perspective of outsiders-vendors, customers, temporaries-can also add valuable and objective information. Find some way to include their comments in the audit.
  3. Develop the overall strategy.
    The next step is to take all of the information and forge it into an overall strategic diversity plan for the organization. While these plans vary the same as the organizations they serve, successful plans include these elements:
      • Senior management has committed to the plan-it is not a surprise and their input has been solicited and included.
      • The plan links diversity with other organizational strategies and initiatives, such as customer service, continuous improvement and employee recognition.
      • The plan clearly outlines long-term strategies as well as short-term actions.
      • Existing systems are used to carry out the plan whenever possible.
      • Included is an ongoing evaluation system that will give feedback quickly across the whole organization.
      • Success criteria will be clearly stated and measurable.
      • The plan will provide guidance for trainers in both designing and delivering diversity training.

  4. Deliver training.
    Training is just part of the strategy for implementing a diversity initiative, but it can “anchor” the initiative in several important ways. Without discussing actual training design, some of the unique characteristics of diversity training should be pointed out.

    The training has to be planted firmly in the real world of business-participants must clearly see how the diversity initiative ties to the bottom line. The initiative needs support throughout the organization; to gain that support, diversity needs to be seen by everyone as an issue. Diversity training cannot be a one-time event. Like safety initiatives, it will work only if its tenets and corresponding behaviors are used every day.

    Diversity training often deals with perception and awareness, and may help change both. Everyone must be included in diversity training at all levels in the organization. Diversity training has a strong emotional content, and the trainer is not immune from these emotions. Training sometimes gets personal, requiring extreme skill and sensitivity on the part of the trainers.

    Finally, because co-facilitation models teamwork, it is an effective approach for diversity training. A pair of trainers who are different in some physical way or who use totally different styles give participants an opportunity to learn that differences can complement and benefit a team. Two facilitators can also be helpful if the discussion becomes difficult or hard to manage. Again, emotions run high in diversity training classrooms.
  5. Measure its effectiveness.
    It is a real challenge to measure whether all the meetings, policy changes, written information and trainings have had the desired effect. What does “valuing” diversity really mean, and is it happening? Are the lessons of consciousness raising and behavior modification transferring to the job?

    Several quantitative measurements have been used with success. For example, some organizations ask participants to develop personal action plans before leaving the course, then follow up over time. Some conduct “before and after” surveys to test awareness building.

    An organization can check the number of equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaints received before the diversity instruction. How do they compare with those after the training? (Of course, complaints always increase immediately after a training. You need to take samplings over time.)

    Look at retention figures. Review expenses for EEO-related litigation. Determine what your exit interviews tell you about why people leave the organization. An intuitive argument suggests that an employee is not working at his or her best when faced with a frustrating employer or inhibiting workplace and the organization is adversely affected.

    There is also the empirical method: Take a walk through the company lunchroom or keep an eye open at the company picnic. Compare the racial or ethnic segregation that can be observed now to a time before the diversity initiative was in place.

    With the balanced leadership of human resources and the sincere efforts of everyone involved, the workplace can be fair and free of hostility. This workplace will function smoothly, creatively and productively. It will belong to an organization that will reach out profitably to its diverse markets and customers with the right messages and the right goods and services.

    The company that successfully implements a diversity initiative will be healthy, vital and fit to compete in today’s tougher marketplace.

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

System Training Takes More Than Classroom Instruction

Today’s workplace is a lot like Charles Dickens’ novel, A Tale of Two Cities: It’s the best of times and the worst of times. On one hand, technology offers us the promise of a more efficient workplace — one in which administrative noise is eliminated and strategic thinking flourishes. On the other hand, consultants, vendors and industry technophiles almost never realize the utopian vision of perfect software and systems. For every company that taps into the full power of technology, a dozen others find themselves short-circuited. They wind up realizing only incremental gains, rather than significant advances.

The whole situation is downright maddening. And it always begins predictably enough. You hear about a new product or capability that promises to transform human resources into a far more efficient operation. You check out a variety of vendors, solicit bids and bring a team of consultants into your department. Finally, when you’re comfortable you’ve made the right choice, you fork over tens of thousands of dollars, or maybe hundreds of thousands of dollars, to your friendly HRMS vendor.

As you fire up the system for the first time and watch the consultant show off its capabilities, you can already see yourself winning a company-sponsored award and taking a giant step up the company ladder. It’s a wonderful time to be an HR manager, you think. And then you unleash the technology on the workforce, only to watch in wide-eyed wonder as the sleek new system chokes on a steady stream of errors, mistakes and mishaps.

If man possesses one quality that’s enough to cause a certifiable migraine, it’s his ability to invent new things that always exceed his capacity to use them effectively.

The next few months are a chamber of horrors that exceed even an IRS audit or a bout with food poisoning. You spend countless hours and untold training sessions trying to get employees up to speed. You pull your hair out trying to eliminate mistakes.

One employee after another complains that the new system is difficult to use and unwieldy. By now, you’re way past the screaming-and-cursing stage. You’ve been reduced to utter despair. You ask yourself, “How can a system that offers so many capabilities become the source of so much resistance? Why are workers rejecting technology that can revolutionize the department and make their lives easier?”

Welcome to the technology paradox. If man possesses one quality that’s enough to cause a certifiable migraine, it’s his ability to invent new things that always exceed his capacity to use them effectively. It’s no bulletin that most of us find it impossible to keep up with all the technological change rocketing through our world. We spend months learning a new software program, finally get a handle on it, then find ourselves greeted with an upgrade offering new and improved features. Once again, we must retrain our brain. We hear about the virtues of intranets, struggle to learn the various functions and capabilities, and then boot the computer one day, only to view a completely redesigned interface.

Learn how to embrace new technology.
Unfortunately, the problem isn’t going away anytime soon. The question is how can an organization embrace new technological solutions, yet maintain a high level of productivity?

Multimedia and Internet Training Newsletter estimates industry spends $55 billion a year on all employee training. That’s a hefty wad of bills. And while the figure doesn’t specifically address the issue of software and computers, it’s obvious that most of us rely on a computer to do our work — whether it’s a dedicated device on the factory floor or a PC sitting on our desktop. Despite trainers descending on the workplace like a swarm of locusts, workers continue to struggle.

If it isn’t for the lack of money and effort spent on training, then what exactly is the answer? First, and perhaps most importantly, it’s crucial to recognize that a corporate culture that embraces change and encourages employees to grow and learn has a better shot at success. Simply offering classes on how to use Microsoft Excel or click a mouse on intranet hyperlinks doesn’t hack it.

As Mark Koskiniemi, vice president of human resources for Buckman Laboratories, explains: “Corporate learning involves more than content, classrooms and instructors. It’s a philosophy that must become embedded in the organization’s culture.”

If any company embodies the learning organization, it’s Buckman Laboratories, a Memphis, Tennessee-based specialty chemical manufacturer that has realized enormous gains through such tools as distance learning and knowledge management. When Buckman hires a new employee, that person quickly discovers that ongoing learning and change are inexorably tied to their jobs and the future of the company. Creating a knowledge-based organization and maintaining skill levels, Koskiniemi says, is an issue that’s 90 percent cultural.

However, cultural changes don’t happen in a vacuum. It’s almost always necessary to create incentives for employees to learn and change. People have to be rewarded — though not always financially — for completing courses and mastering skills. They have to see a payoff for themselves, as well as the company.

Simply telling them that a new program or system will pay dividends for their department isn’t enough. Many workers, and even some managers, are less concerned with how strategic HR is and how much money it can save than getting through their day, month and life with minimal hassles and roadblocks.

Technology used correctly can liberate workers.
Of course, if you’re going to sell workers on the promise of the technology, you darn well better deliver. As Glen Marianko, chief technologist for Progressive Strategies Inc., a New York City-based market research and consulting firm, explains: “If management doesn’t know exactly what it wants to do with its systems, and if it doesn’t have a well-structured plan, problems and failures will begin to occur. When that happens, employees begin to feel a lot of pain and things begin to break down.”

HRIS professionals and executives get caught up in marketing hoopla and buy a product based on the possibilities, rather than the actual capabilities.

However, when it’s done right, technology can liberate workers from the drudgery of administrative overhead. It can spur them toward more creative and innovative solutions. Suddenly, they can see the advantages of the system and take it upon themselves to learn how to use it more effectively.

Philosophically, that’s in sharp contrast to the conventional wisdom of providing training and letting that drive the learning process. While it’s indisputable that people need to comprehend the dizzying array of features that litter a typical program, that in itself does nothing to change the corporate mindset. In fact, organizations that take this approach sometimes find that the disconnection between using and understanding widens until the company is filled with employees who dutifully sit in classes and learn how to click icons with a high degree of accuracy, but still cannot use the technology to any strategic advantage.

A factor that further complicates this equation is that most systems are far too difficult to use — even for a person who has years of experience using a computer.

Various studies show that between 80 percent and 90 percent of the features in a typical program never see the light of the computer monitor. While software engineers and programmers are busy stuffing capabilities into a system so that it can work for any company or person in the charted universe, they forget that simple and streamlined is often better. Unfortunately, HRIS professionals and executives get caught up in the marketing hoopla and buy a product based on the possibilities, rather than the actual capabilities at their firm. Then it’s up to workers to live with the consequences.

Like many challenges facing HR and the larger corporate universe, the problem isn’t solved through training slogans, two-hour Excel classes, ongoing rhetoric and assorted quick-fix solutions. When an organization creates an effective technology plan, links systems and resources so that people can do their jobs better, and develops a culture that embraces change as a strategic advantage, resistance fades and the true revolution begins.

Workforce, December 1998, Vol. 77, No. 12, pp.124-126.

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Employees Will Tell Stories — Send the Right Message

What do you do when stories run counter to the company’s core values? Could you harness them to make them useful? What kinds of stories are circulating in your workplace?

Employee Disempowerment
We recently replaced our windows, which were about 30 years old. The new windows have cranks that allow you to roll the window out to open them. The president of the company collected all the window cranks and announced that he would hand them out on days when it may be appropriate to open a window. All cranks had to be turned back in to him personally at the end of the day. This is done by the president of a multi-million dollar company owned by a multi-billion dollar company!

The lesson: Employees watch how you spend your time and prestige.

Discouraging Creativity
Working as an engineer for a major defense manufacturer, I was summoned to the factory to deal with a problem involving a critical part of one of our defense systems. The problem had existed before, prior solutions had been tried without success, and production came to a halt. This was important, as there was a penalty clause in the contract.

I went home weary. That night I took my wife out to a movie, during which a unique approach to solving the problem came to me. We left the movie, drove to the plant, and I went in and marshaled the second shift (it was 11 pm) to try the new approach. It worked and solved the problem once and for all. The next day I was chewed out by my supervisor for entering the plant and working without prior authorization.

The lesson: Solve problems at your own risk.

Whose Idea Was This?
I work for one of the nation’s leading insurance providers. We have a large campaign for customer service. One planned event required us to dress up in NASCAR (National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing) attire. I never understood how that would increase customer service, since we had no ties to NASCAR whatsoever. The event was canceled because there was a customer visiting that day. I don’t know; I just work here.

The lesson: Send a consistent, clear message.

Devaluing Employees
Several years ago, I worked for a large credit card company. One day a very sick person put a bomb in the basement cafeteria. We never learned how this person got into the building, so we think it must have been an employee. Upon receiving word of this bomb, upper management immediately left the building. While leaving, they instructed the security guard at the entrance to let no one in or out.

The security guard, taking his instruction very seriously, refused to let any of the middle management or employees out of the building, and refused to let the police and fire department in! He had to be arrested and removed. Adding insult to injury, the police and fire department wouldn’t let middle management or employees out either, citing the need to interview all who were on the premises. While this interviewing process was going on, the bomb squad was defusing the bomb — inside the building!

Once it was defused and everyone was interviewed, we were allowed to leave. The next day, some very quick-witted individual put out a tongue-in-cheek memo on bomb evacuations. It was very clever, citing how to step over management and what windows to exit from following the blast. Unfortunately, someone let the cat out of the bag. The author was found, then fired for bad-mouthing the company. We were ordered never to speak of the incident again, and were told that speaking to the media would result in immediate discharge.

The lesson: Whose life has value in this company?

Workforce, December 1998, Vol. 77, No. 12, p. 38.

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Questions to ask a Prospective Diversity Trainer and That Trainers Clients

Questions to Ask a Prospective Trainer


How long have you been a diversity trainer?
— Experience is no guarantee of quality, but it’s a plus.


How did you attain cultural awareness and proficiency? What experiences influenced your cross-cultural skills development?


What organizations like ours have you trained for? How were they like ours; how were they different?


What exactly did you do for those organizations?
— Listen for specifics. If they aren’t there, they may not exist.


What problems did you encounter? How did you handle them?
— Be wary if a trainer claims there were no problems.


What measurable results were realized?
— Ask yourself if it was worth it.


What do you need to know about the trainees before you begin? How will that information affect your presentation?
— Answers will tell you something about how the candidate customizes training.


Describe your training methods and style.


What could cause changes in the contract after training has begun? What are the possible cost implications?
— Ask for examples.


What sort of environment do you aim for in a training session? How do you go about achieving it?


What experiences have you had with trainees who became hostile or abusive to you or other trainees? What did you do?


What do you do with trainees who convey by word or actions that they think diversity training is a waste of their time?


Would you customize training because of our industry/mission, size, educational level of trainees or ethnic groups? How?


What are the responsibilities of the client? Of the trainer? Of the trainees?


What would we need to do to get the most out of a contract with you?


What experience have you had with XYZ problems?
— Here, you want to specify your problems, such as homophobia.


Questions to Ask About a Prospective Trainer to His or Her Clients


How did you find him or her?
— This may give you a clue as to their objectivity, and may give you another person to check with.


What were your needs?
— Listen to how specific they were.


What did the trainer do for you?
— Get specifics, from project definition through design, training, evaluation and follow-up.


In what ways did the trainer help you understand your diversity needs and deal with them?
— For example, did the trainer identify issues that had been overlooked? Did the trainer improve upon the proposal?


Tell us about your working relationship, such as their availability and responsiveness, their punctuality, reliability and candor.


What indicators did you have of the trainer’s sincerity? Ethics?


Would you hire him or her again? If so, what would you do differently?
— This could point out trainer weaknesses, or tell you what it takes to work well with that trainer.


What do you know now about selecting a trainer that would have helped you make a better choice?


Source: “Consumer’s Guide to Diversity Training,” The Times Mirror Company and The County of Los Angeles, Commission on Human Relations.

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Equal Pay for Men and Women a Self-Audit

Women continue to tell the U.S. Department of Labor that pay is one of their biggest workplace concerns. A look at earnings data indicates a continuing wage gap between women and men. Although the wage gap has narrowed over the years, in 1997, working women still earned only 74 percent of men’s weekly earnings on average. The average woman would have to work from January 1, 1997 to April 3, 1998 to earn what the average man earned in 1997 alone. For women of color, the gap is even greater compared to white men.


Businesses have a great stake in equal-pay issues, as well. The wage gap and the glass ceiling reflect the undervaluation of an important sector of the workforce. Global competitiveness places greater demands on business.


Employers vary greatly by industry, gross sales and number of employees, yet very few are exempt from the laws that require equal pay and equal employment opportunity. We are providing the following 10-step guide which we believe will be helpful to you in developing a general framework for policies that will ensure equal pay, regardless of an individual employer’s characteristics. Small businesses may decide they do not need the formalized processes that are often essential for employers of larger workforces, yet may still find it useful to apply all or some of these concepts in assessing compensation programs for their employees.


  1. Conduct a recruitment self-audit.
    Does your hiring process seek diversity in the qualified applicant pool for positions?
  2. Evaluate your compensation system for internal equity.
    Do you have a method to determine salaries and benefits?

    Do you write position descriptions, seek employee input and develop consensus for position descriptions? In unionized workplaces, do you involve union leaders?

    Do you have a consistent job evaluation system? Are jobs scored or assigned grades? Are positions where women and minorities work scored or graded according to the same standards as jobs where men or non-minorities work?

    Could a method be used for ensuring consistent pay for people with substantially similar levels of experience and education who hold jobs calling for substantially similar degrees of skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions, even though job titles may be different?
  3. Evaluate your compensation system for industry competitiveness.
    Do you have a method to determine the market rate for any given job? Do you ensure that market rates are applied consistently? (i.e., Can you be confident that men are not being compensated at or above market rates while women are compensated at or below market rates? Can you be confident that non-minority workers are not compensated at or above market rates while minority workers’ compensation is at or below the market rates?)

    Would your company benefit from a fresh approach that updates position descriptions; assesses skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions of various jobs; assigns grades or scores; and ensures consistent application of market rates and external competitiveness?
  4. Conduct a new job evaluation system if needed.
    Do you have up-to-date position descriptions for all occupations?

    Do you establish criteria for assigning values to skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions of jobs? Do you challenge basic assumptions about the value of skills before points or grades? (i.e.: Do you consider how caring for sick people, small muscle dexterity in typing, and other such skills may have been undervalued in jobs that have been traditionally held by women?)

    Do you ensure agreement among worker representatives and management on criteria to evaluate jobs?

    Do you assign scores or grades to jobs and allow worker input?

    Do you compare your system with market rates and other external competitiveness factors?

    Do you consider whether the market has undercompensated certain occupations or professions before making adjustments?

    Do you assign consistent compensation to jobs within similar grades or scores, and do you use market rates and other external competitiveness factors consistently?
  5. Examine your compensation system and compare job grades or scores.
    How does pay compare for positions with similar grades or scores within your company?

    On average, are women and minorities paid similarly to men and non-minorities within the same grade or job score? Are there legitimate reasons for any disparities in pay between jobs with similar grades or scores? Can corrections be made to ensure consistency in assigning grades or scores?

    How long do men, women and minorities stay within job grades or scores before moving up? Do men or non-minority workers move up faster? What are the reasons that some workers move up faster? Can you take action to ensure that all workers have equal opportunity for advancement?
  6. Review data for personnel entering your company.
    At what grades or positions do men, women and minorities typically enter your company?

    Within those grades and positions, are salaries consistent, or do men, women and minorities enter at different pay levels?

    How does negotiation affect entry-level salaries? Are men able to negotiate higher starting salaries than women or minorities?

    How do new hires compare in salary to those already working in the company in the same grades or positions? Do men, women and minorities entering the company get paid higher or lower than those who already hold the same positions or grades? Are there differences by gender or race?

    Are changes needed to ensure that new hires are treated consistently and incorporated into existing compensation systems on a compatible basis?
  7. Assess opportunity for employees to win commissions and bonuses.
    Are men, women and minorities assigned projects or clients with high commission potential on a consistent basis?

    Are men, women and minorities with similar levels of performance awarded bonuses on a consistent basis? Do they receive bonuses of similar monetary values?
  8. Assess how raises are awarded.
    Is there a consistent method of evaluating performance for all workers? Do men, women and minorities receive consistent raises based on similar performance standards? (i.e., Are all workers with outstanding evaluations awarded the same percentage increases? If not, what are the reasons for the difference?)
    Are men, women and minorities with similar levels of performance awarded bonuses on a consistent basis? Do they receive bonuses of similar monetary values?
  9. Evaluate employee training, development and promotion opportunities.
    How are workers selected for participation in training opportunities or special projects that lead to advancement? Are there differences by race or gender? If so, what can be done to widen the pool to reflect equal opportunity?
  10. Implement changes where needed, maintain equity and share your success.
    Have you made changes to ensure consistency in evaluation of jobs, assignment of grades or scores, advancement within the system, performance evaluation, compensation levels, raises, bonuses, commissions and training? Have you evaluated your compensation system periodically to ensure that it meets equal employment opportunity goals?

    Do you maintain openness about compensation with your workforce? Do you regularly post job openings and salary ranges within the workplace? Do you allow employees to discuss compensation issues on their own time?

    Are you reaping the rewards of a productive, loyal workforce, and using your success as a competitive tool to attract the best and brightest workers?

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Room S 3002, Washington, DC 20210, Phone: 202/219-6611

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

14 Tips on Communicating With Diversity in Mind

Here are 14 great tips that may help your written and oralcommunication.

  1. Remember that diversity has many levels and complexities, including cultures withincultures.
    A 70-year-old female small business owner from Brazil may be very differentfrom a 26-year-old man of Mexican descent.
  2. Don’t separate people.
    Avoid phrases like “Jewish people understandthat ….”
  3. Admit what you don’t know.
    People from outside of America know a lot aboutAmerica from TV and movies, but we know less about them. Homosexuals know all aboutheterosexuals; few heterosexuals know much about homosexuals.
  4. Notice what people call themselves.
    Do they use Persian or Iranian; Korean orAsian; Black or African-American; Hispanic or Chicano.
  5. Don’t make assumptions based on a person’s appearance, name or group.
    For example, many people with ethnic or religious last names don’t belong to thereligion or ethnicity identified with that name. Another example: Don’t assume thatbecause someone is of a certain religion or nationality, they belong to a certainpolitical party or have certain stereotypical opinions associated with that ethnicity.
  6. Don’t patronize.
    Avoid phrases like “You understand the importanceof…”.
  7. Don’t doubt the authenticity of what you hear.
    Each person is the highestauthority on what she or he feels.
  8. Be willing to have your biases changed.
  9. When writing, replace judgements with facts.
    Rather than using the word”elderly,” give a person’s age — if it’s even relevant.
  10. When writing and speaking, consider whether some references and adjectives should bedeleted.
    For example, in describing Driving Miss Daisy as a movie about a”Southern woman and her Black chauffeur,” is the word Black necessary?
  11. Use parallel titles and terms.
    Sometimes men are referred to using their firstand last names, but women are referred to with just their first names. Avoid such bias.
  12. Think about your use of “we.”
    Sentences like: “As we approachChristmas, contact the HR department if you want to help with party planning” can bevery alienating.
  13. Don’t use judgmental words.
    The term “openly gay” is lessjudgmental than “admittedly gay” or “avowed homosexual.” Also,”sexual orientation” is considered more accurate and less judgmental than”sexual preference.”
  14. When writing, have someone review your work who may have a different perspective.

SOURCE: Compiled by Workforce Online from “When We Talk,” “No Offense Intended,” “23 Tips on Cross-Cultural Communication,” and “How to Communicate Better with Clients, Customers, and Workers Whose English Is Limited,” by Transamerica Life Companies, GTE Telephone Operations, and the County of Los Angeles Commission on Human Relations.

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

The Tyranny of ‘The Other’

Racism. Sexism. Ageism. Religious bias. Homophobia. We talk about these attitudes as if they are different forms of mold and rot in the minds of our citizens. Although it’s true that each reveals a particular stench when exposed, none thrives alone. All of these thoughts breed in the same dark place: our fear of “The Other.”

This fear has been with us always. It was there when Native Americans were butchered. It drove us when enslaved African Americans were tortured, and when Japanese Americans were robbed and interned. We hope these fears will subside, but instead they mutate into ideas that are ever uglier, and they lead to savagery that changes how we see the world.

We are not quite the same since James Byrd Jr., an African American, was dismembered when he was tied to a pickup and dragged through the streets of a small Texas town. And we are diminished because Matthew Shepard, a young gay man, was beaten and strung up on a fence like a scarecrow, left to die in rural Wyoming. From what we know, each died only because he was The Other.

Yes, the mold lives on, and it lives everywhere — in our homes, our streets, our government, our churches and in our workplaces. You know this, which is why you have nurtured diversity programs in your organizations. Sadly, such programs haven’t worked. Intended to foster understanding and to help the disenfranchised, most programs have fallen short of their goals. Some have made matters worse.

There are instances in which the programs are to blame, but our attention is better focused on sweeping forces outside organizations and within that serve to strengthen the notion of The Other.

Time and again we are asked to affiliate with a particular (and ever-smaller) demographic. We are asked to stand up and be counted as a Christian mother, a smoker, a rap music fan, a golfer, a liberal, an intellectual, a suburbanite, a “Friends” viewer, a retiree and on and on.

We are asked to choose by some churches, many journalists, most marketers and nearly all politicians. In sermons and headlines and commercials and platforms, our differences are emphasized while our similarities are overlooked. The siren calls to find people just like ourselves are powerful.

The result is a frightening paradox. As we choose a group, we often find a sense of community and belonging thought lost by many people. But the safer and more comfortable we feel, the more we fear it will be taken from us by The Other.

The issues within organizations are more subtle, but just as powerful. Employees are offered training or they aren’t. They are rewarded for their work or they aren’t. They get an assigned parking place or they don’t. And so on. Some of these distinctions are necessary, and others benign. But collectively, they reinforce The Other. How else to explain the enduring, systemic pall of lower salaries, limited opportunities and blatant discrimination against all who are The Other?

You can’t change economics or politics. But you can move beyond diversity programs to focus on pay parity, advancement and other issues that make a difference. No, your efforts will not cure the rot that eats away at our society, but they will help. Someone must stop focusing on The Other and instead focus on The One. Otherwise, there will be more James Byrd Jrs. and Matthew Shepards.

Workforce, December 1998, Vol. 77, No. 12, p. 4.

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

The Power of Storytelling

After a cross-country flight one rainy evening in July, my husband and I stopped on the way to Cape Cod at a well-known family restaurant outside Boston to have dinner. When we arrived, a harried greeter seated us near the kitchen.

While waiting for someone to take our order, we noticed that the waitstaff looked sweaty and disheveled, and the patrons seemed to be impatient. Our waitress mumbled something about the manager doing the cooking because the cook had failed to show up.

We weren’t in a hurry. Being optimistic, we waited.

Soon, angry patrons appeared at the kitchen entrance, asking when their orders would be ready. We couldn’t recall having ever seen that before. As the buzz in the store grew louder, one portly patron marched into the kitchen with his plate and yelled: “This pot roast is s___!” He then scooped handfuls of mashed potatoes and pot roast and threw them — overhand — at the manager. Back at his table, his wife tried to disappear into the vinyl banquette. We knew we hadn’t ever seen that before.

We canceled our dinners. Our waitress could only say, “I don’t blame you,” as we left the restaurant, still hungry.

We now tell the story to friends as a sign of America’s breakdown of civility. But what if we were restaurant managers? We would use that story to illustrate the importance of the staff working together — and what could happen if they didn’t. We would use it to illustrate a powerful image of everything going wrong and ask employees to think of ways to head off a similar disaster in one’s own restaurant. We would turn the story to our advantage by using it to teach employees about teambuilding.

Storytelling in the workplace is a dynamic strategy for empowering employees to understand and embody an organization’s core values. Leaders at all levels can learn how to use storytelling to educate, inform, motivate and inspire their employees.

Storytelling can impart the corporate culture and values.
Chris Dunblazier, who is in the restaurant business, says, “Storytelling is the most effective way to show what happens if you don’t do [something] the right way, and what happens if you do. Stories stick in a person’s mind.”

Dunblazier, director of operations at Souper Salad in Oklahoma City, has worked for the company since its inception 15 years ago. During the first 12 years, Souper Salad, a privately owned restaurant chain based in San Antonio, Texas, opened 50 stores. (Fifty more have opened in the last three years, and there will be about 200 more by the year 2000.) In her region alone, Dunblazier will open 20 stores next year.

In the face of such rapid growth, regional directors of operations and the company’s officers need to impart company culture to large numbers of new hires very quickly. She explains, “We expect stories to come in handy.”

One story Dunblazier shares explains why the company insists on uniform appearance standards, especially among store managers. “Once I had a call from a general manager who told me, ‘You won’t believe this, but our manager, John, just walked in here in full makeup, in uniform, with long red fingernails.’

I consulted with HR, then explained to John that he was free to wear whatever he wanted outside of work, but the restaurant doesn’t even allow heavy makeup for women employees, and no restaurant employee can have long fingernails at work. I told him that anything that makes a guest look twice at the manager is not a good idea. The next day, John didn’t have the nails, and had just a small amount of eyeliner.

Months later, I was wearing my corporate shirt on a flight. I found myself seated on the plane beside a visitor who told me he’d gone into one of our stores once and an employee — he was pretty sure it was the manager — had been in full makeup. He said he’d never gone back.”

When Dunblazier tells this story, she hopes that it will remind an employee to think twice about wearing a particular “look” at work. Could this story help employees make decisions consistent with the company’s appearance standards? Could it help them understand why the appearance standards exist? Employees will know that those decisions matter in the company’s overall goal of increasing guest counts.

Stories can build an organization’s identity. “Anyone who has had an experience has a story to tell and, with some coaching, has the capacity to tell it,” Kaye believes.

Stories like Dunblazier’s can shape an organizational culture and build an organization’s identity, according to Beverly Kaye, organizational consultant and author of Up Is Not The Only Way (Consulting Psychologists Press, 1997). Kaye has worked with numerous Fortune 500 companies on using stories to convey a company’s corporate culture. “Anyone who has had an experience has a story to tell and, with some coaching, has the capacity to tell it,” she believes. Leaders, she adds, can learn to tell stories and can be taught to be more effective. Kaye often finds that they warm to the experience because storytelling gives them a forum they otherwise wouldn’t have. She also believes the telling is as good for the teller as it is for the audience.

Kaye offers a dramatic example of a business leader who told employees the story of his own episode of acute stress and depression.

“Many in the organization knew about it, but not how it happened or why. He told it to a group of ‘high potential’ employees with such honesty and such detail. He described how he had been driven to the point of the episode, what acute stress and depression was like, what it took to recover and how he runs his life now as a result.

When I asked if he had heard that story from someone else when he was in his 30s, could it have prevented his episode, he said yes.

‘This is my legacy,’ he explained. ‘To tell them, warn them, help them avoid it.’”

Will the 30 year-old “high potential” who is tempted to go into overdrive remember that story? A high potential forgets it only at his or her own peril.

Kaye calls stories “devices for creating and maintaining a widespread understanding of the subtle cultural and political realities underlying a specific organization’s life.” One of those political realities is the risk of driving oneself too hard. How can a story help someone avoid doing that?

Kaye explains that we can “view our lives as a movie rather than a slide show, seeing connections among actions and significance in experiences.” Remembering the story helps people “watch” the movie of their lives inside their heads, casting themselves in the role portrayed by the storyteller.

Storytelling can help employees accept a new initiative.
When HR needs to facilitate acceptance of a new initiative or program, telling a story can help people imagine what the workplace will be like after the change — not something that many people do very easily.

Managers at TRW’s Space and Electronics Group (S&EG) in Redondo Beach, California, tell the story of competing for the contract to build China’s first satellite. By doing so, they’re selling employees on the benefits of TRW’s Workforce Diversity Program.

In 1994, TRW bid for a satellite contract with the People’s Republic of China’s National Space Program Office (NSPO). The successful bidder would build the first Chinese satellite.

Chinese-American TRW employees organized themselves into a Chinese Employee Network Group, and assumed a major role in making sure that the proposal was compliant and culturally coherent, according to Lou Rosales, then HR manager for TRW. Chinese-American employees who were skilled in speaking Mandarin, and reading and writing Chinese, took a leadership role in representing TRW to the customer. They helped develop the proposal and reviewed it before submission to NSPO. They videotaped an executive summary of the proposal, explaining that the group also would be working on the satellite development team.

Well into 1995, after TRW had won the bid and was developing the satellite, members of the Chinese Employee Network Group reported that the customer’s comfort with the proposal and development teams contributed strongly to the success of the ongoing project. Rosales reports that their achievement spurred other Employee Network Groups based on a workforce diversity variable such as country of origin.

The story continues to be told as managers recount TRW’s Space and Electronics Group’s success in entering the Asia/Pacific market.

TRW also has other ways of explaining its workforce diversity program. Through the organization’s newsletter, Infolink, employees read the following: “Because of growing global opportunities and declining domestic defense markets, S&EG is now competing in the international marketplace. One major reason for the company’s success so far is the involvement and contribution of a diverse group of employees who often reflect the diversity of our new customers.” How much more power does that statement acquire in the context of the Chinese satellite contract story?

Since that experience, TRW also tells the story of the successful bid for the Korean Multipurpose Satellite, relying on a proposal and development team that was comprised of — well, now you know.

Storytelling can create a shared vision of the company’s future.
Another story comes from the history of Celanese Corporation, before its merger with American Hoechst to become Trevira, based in Houston and now known as KoSa.

In the early 1980s, Celanese began a cultural transformation using the Japanese quality awareness program that was influencing American businesses at the time. Celanese was working on adapting quality awareness to suit its own culture. That process allowed what HR department manager Tom Holmes calls “the genesis of a vision.”

Holmes’ story of Macomber is a story of visionary leadership energizing and empowering the corporation’s employees. Corporate values now include the profound commitment to excellence that the story reflects.

At a high-level meeting, the corporate director for quality was meeting with the operating officers. John Macomber, the CEO of Celanese, was in the room. The presentation by the corporate director for quality focused on approximately 20 areas where progress was being measured.

Macomber leaned back in his chair and posed what became this famous question: “We’re at a stage where we’d rate about a three on a scale of 10. But I’m not as interested in where we are as in where we’re going. What I’d like to know is what 10 out of 10 would look like.”

Everyone acknowledged that it was a great question, and the corporate director for quality promised that he and the directors for quality management would develop an answer.

That answer came back as a “quality document,” now known as the “Ten Out of Ten” document. “‘Ten Out of Ten’ became the statement of the corporation’s cultural goals, a vision of excellence for what our organization would look like,” Holmes explains. “It was enormously powerful; it galvanized people to close the gap between where we were and where we were headed.”

Celanese surveyed all employees, rating progress on each point, in a process of 360-degree feedback for the entire corporation. Holmes is convinced that “things moved much more quickly than if Macomber had lectured.

“The statement empowered employees,” Holmes continues. “The document — and the story of Macomber’s question — held sway for a couple of years. Then in the merger with American Hoechst, it became embedded in the Hoechst Celanese values statement.” The story of the CEO “earning his pay that day” by asking such a powerful question remains alive at the new company.

Holmes’ story of Macomber is a story of visionary leadership energizing and empowering the corporation’s employees. As long-term employees have told others the story, it has conveyed the company’s cultural shift to quality improvement. Corporate values now include the profound commitment to excellence that the story reflects.Kaye explains that the Macomber story describes a “visionary leader who creates completely new stories to inspire transformation in organizations.” According to Kaye, the story is a good example of a leader using “words to convince others of a point of view, and the story is the best way to convey the point.” She also notes that leaders can use stories “to revive neglected or existing themes that need to be communicated.”

Orchestrate the story to convey a meaningful message.
A good story is hardly complicated. Significant experiences can easily be translated into a memorable lesson.

First, the teller describes a situation. (“The corporate director for quality was meeting with the operating officers.”) Second, he or she describes the action. (“Macomber leaned back in his chair and posed what became this famous question.”) Third, the teller describes a memorable resolution. (“‘Ten Out of Ten’ became the statement of the corporation’s cultural goals, a vision of excellence for what our organization would look like.”)

People are going to talk. By understanding and using the power of storytelling, HR can influence managers to frame the discussion into stories that will accomplish the company’s goals. Try it when the cook quits and the customer throws pot roast. Frame it so it’s useful. It will make a great story.

Workforce, December 1998, Vol. 77, No. 12, pp.36-41.

Posted on December 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Disabilities Are A Matter of Perception

Recently someone asked Workforce: “Does the ADA only apply to people who have a disability, or does it apply to anyone with a condition that is ‘perceived’ as a disability?”


In a sense, because the ADA protects those “perceived” as having a disability, it does not really matter whether a person has a disability. For example, if an employer takes adverse employment action against someone because the employer believes the employee has HIV, then the ADA will apply and the legality of an employer’s action will be determined by whether the employee can perform the essential functions of the position with a reasonable accommodation. It makes no difference whether or not the individual actually has the virus.


Source: Epstein, Becker & Green, November 10, 1998, New York.

Posted on November 30, 1998June 29, 2023

Sexual Harassment Are Supervisors Individually Liable

The question recently came up in the Workforce Online Legal Forum, “Can supervisors be ‘individually’ liable for sexual harassment?”


On a federal level, the answer, generally, is no, although there are exceptions to this rule for high level employees and agents, or sole proprietorships. Rules under state common law or discrimination statutes vary from state to state. Your state fair employment practices agency can provide you more information.


Source: Epstein, Becker & Green, November 10, 1998, New York.


Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 522 Page 523 Page 524 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress