Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

HR At the Table Best Questions Posed to HR by CEOs

Some CEOs may be clueless, but many are working hand in hand with HR to make businesses better. For evidence that HR is playing a strategic role in organizations, look no further than some of the provocative, challenging questions that CEOs have posed to HR professionals. How would you answer these questions?

  1. What makes an employee want to stay at our company?
  2. Can you develop an HR strategy that will get the business from point A to point B?
  3. If the company were yours, what changes would you make?
  4. What are you doing to provide value-added services to your internal clients?
  5. What are the three most important things we could do to improve employee morale?
  6. How are you going to invest in HR this year so that we have a better HR department than our competitors?
  7. In the eyes of HR, what should we be doing to improve our marketplace position?
  8. What can the HR department do to add to the bottom line?
  9. Five years from now, how will cultural diversity affect our business?
  10. Which do you consider more important: customers or employees?
  11. How are you measuring the effectiveness of HR?
  12. What’s the best change we can make to prepare for the future?
  13. What do you see as the biggest impediment to our performance?
  14. How can we reinvest in employees?
  15. What can the company do to develop and promote women?

Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, p. 74.

Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

A Day in the Life of Don Borwhat Coaching Teams for High Involvement

Wednesday, April 8


Charlottesville, Virginia—As Workforce journalists, we often interview our sources after a program’s proven success. Seldom have we had the opportunity to witness “works in progress.” Most of our interactions normally take place by phone, fax and e-mail. I was, therefore, delighted to hop on a plane to Charlottesville, Virginia—birthplace of several U.S. presidents, including Thomas Jefferson—to spend one day shadowing Donald R. Borwhat Jr., senior vice president of human resources and public relations for GE Fanuc Automation.


GE Fanuc, you may recall, was a Workforce Magazine Optimas Award winner for Partnership in 1997. Launched in January 1987, it’s a joint venture between General Electric and FANUC Ltd. of Japan. The company designs, manufactures and sells products (including industrial computers and software) and services for factory automation.


Borwhat and I met the day before my scheduled visit at the plant. He had offered to take me out to dinner—arriving somewhat apologetically in his son’s disheveled 1996 gold Buick La Sabre. “You’ve got to excuse me. I walked outside to the parking lot only to find that my son [a 25-year-old law student at Syracuse University] swapped my [cranberry Porsche] for his car. He wanted to impress a date in D.C.,” he says, chuckling at the pretensions of youth.


“How was your trip?” he asked.


“A bit bumpy on this tiny United Express airplane,” I replied. “Another passenger and I were sure we were going to crash.”


“You didn’t say you were a wimp!” he retorted.


I knew then that my visit was in good hands. Borwhat is flexible, confident, personable and direct. These were the qualities I observed in him from the moment I arrived—and admired even more by the time I said goodbye. Here’s a glimpse of an executive coach who knows how to listen, ask the right questions and keep his day—and those of others—from reeling out of control. (His day included no less than 12 meetings and one global telephone conference call to London—all pre-scheduled to run as briefly as 15 minutes and no longer than one hour.)


5:00 a.m.
Up before the sun.
Thomas Jefferson would have been proud of Borwhat. According to history and legend, our third president of the United States always rose with the sun. Borwhat awakens when the Blue Ridge mountains are still pitch black. He catches a local TV news program called “Sunrise”—only to find out that the New York Knicks lost to the Atlanta Hawks. Before driving off to work, he permits his three dogs (a golden retriever, German shepherd and Bernese mountain dog) to run around the five acres of land he owns in a suburb known as Western Albemarle—15 minutes from work.


6:00 a.m.
Checking e-mail.
He arrives at his office to check his e-mail before picking me up at 7:00. (Eleven e-mails arrived in his mailbox, including one from London, another from Singapore, two referring to sales staff and one about an upcoming business trip to Los Angeles.)


As we drive toward the headquarters, passing dogwood trees, lush with fresh pink blossoms, he points out the building’s resemblance to a college campus. “We wanted our employees to feel their work environment was a cool place.”


Inside, Borwhat’s office is decorated with miniature orange, blue and black model race cars. In addition, family photos, a Nerf basketball hoop, a DILBERT® calendar, certificates of appreciation from the local school district and a Japanese dharma adorn his workspace. His PalmPilot pocket organizer already is plugged into his office computer. “All of my staff have one,” he says. “But I tell them they don’t have to read the e-mails I send them late at night.”


His HR team includes seven individuals—all women—including an intern from Mexico who’s participating in GE Fanuc’s leadership program.


7:00 a.m.
School-business partnerships.
Borwhat meets with two HR staff members and a representative from Charlottesville Albemarle School Business Alliance. The joint venture serves as a clearinghouse to coordinate the needs of the schools with the community resources. Borwhat listens to their reports of a recent breakfast fund-raiser. When the staff suggests a better way to solicit larger donors, he quickly reacts, “Good idea!” and establishes it as an action item. He also suggests getting a mailing list from the local Chamber of Commerce and volunteers GE Fanuc to cover some printing costs.


8:00 a.m.
Career pathing an employee.
An employee wants more challenge. She thinks she would like to transfer to sales and marketing—job functions outside her current department. Borwhat listens: “So, you want a new job?” He re-serves his judgment until he has spoken to her supervisor, but offers the employee encouragement. “Wait about a month. We’re making a lot of changes in marketing. In the meantime, perhaps you can consider a cross-functional move instead of a job change. And let’s get your internal resume and performance appraisal up to speed.” (Within the last hour, he has received eight more e-mails.)


8:30 a.m.
Meeting with the HR team.
The main topic of concern is employee recruitment and retention. Borwhat’s staff discusses the relationship between the “critical-to-quality” (CTQ) needs of the company, such as engineering and software expertise, and the “key process input variables” (KPIV)—employee-driven factors that impact the CTQ items, such as job training, compensation, family, work environment, growth opportunities. Charlottesville, Borwhat explains, is one of the most family-friendly cities in the United States. Even so, GE Fanuc faces the challenge of keeping its employees—particularly the skilled engineers and sales reps—tracked in its “High Involvement Workforce (HIWF),” driven by HR.


9:45 a.m.
Manufacturing metrics.
Borwhat walks me to the shop floor, where he’s able to observe one of the teams review its ‘promises kept.’ Last year, GE Fanuc employees reduced its order-to-ship days from 22 to 11. Team members are able to produce their results on computers, read production charts and articulate their assessments with workers’ pride—an example of HIWF. On the way out, I notice a showcase against the wall, which displays awards given to GE Fanuc by former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich as a best-practices company in his Model Workforce Program and attention from President Clinton as a best-practices company in his Workforce 2000 initiative.


10:30 a.m.
Information technology.
Borwhat conducts a smaller meeting with his HR manager and a staff member from IT. They discuss two employees, including one who has ego problems and poor communication skills. He suggests crafting the job description more along the lines of the employee’s strengths while working on his weaker areas. As the two colleagues discuss the employees, Borwhat’s hand is clicking on his mouse while his eyes are focused on the computer screen. I tease him later, but he assures me, “You notice I didn’t respond to any e-mails during our meeting. I was listening the whole time.”


11:00 a.m.
Employee incentives.
As soon as he walks into the conference room, he announces: “I just want an overview.” He encourages colleagues to ask a lot of questions. “Argue with me,” he says. “I’m good at that,” quips Shelly Cerio, HR manager, sales and global locations. Apparently, HR is concerned about how to motivate its sales staff. They discuss what kinds of company bonus plans can be created that will still be aligned with new Department of Labor regulations about overtime and profit sharing.


Noon
Skip-level luncheon.
Once a week, a cadre of employees from various departments are invited into the executive conference room for lunch with the CEO. A month earlier, GE Fanuc hired Joe Hogan to replace former president and CEO, Bob Collins, who is retiring. Borwhat listens as the six employees explain their jobs and field questions from Hogan: “Do you like your job?” “What’s a normal day for you?” “What questions or concerns do you have?” At the end of the meeting, he asks, “Say, what do people in Charlottesville do for fun?”


1:30 p.m.
Manufacturing training team.
A dozen employees meet to discuss the qualifications for a training director. Borwhat sits along the edge of the room. His objective, he explains, is to simply listen. “I want to check out their framework for standardizing training throughout manufacturing.” HR may end up not hiring for the position, but Borwhat says the employees’ discussion will illuminate their needs. Then he can return with suggestions that might solve the problems without having to recruit another manager. “What are you looking for? Someone to do the training or to administrate? If you’re looking for a real trainer, that person may not want to do administration,” he cautions. “On the other hand, a person can be the best on process, but not be able to teach others.” All of a sudden, someone says, “We’re out of time.” And he’s off to another meeting.


Borwhat has already spent nearly eight hours on the job. He had to e-mail me the rest of his day because I had to catch a plane back to Manhattan. In a nutshell, he proceeded with a conference call to London to discuss HR issues related to a recent acquisition and attended two more meetings about distribution in California and business interests in China and Singapore.


At 6:30 p.m., he cleaned up his e-mailbox, returned his phone calls and met with Michelle Clatterbuck, HR manager, organization and staffing. Borwhat arrived home at 7:40 p.m. His wife, Margaret, had prepared a seafood dinner.


“It’s great to have a wife who lets me get away with these crazy hours,” he says.


9 p.m.
Outside for a cigar and time to play with the dogs.


Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, pp. 84-88.


Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Why Returning to Work After Battling AIDS Carries Special Baggage

Battling and beating any life-threatening illness is a tremendous accomplishment. However, those people who have stared down AIDS and won often have additional demons to battle. AIDS carries with it a certain stigma that other illnesses don’t carry, making it much more difficult for people who’ve fought AIDS, and lived to tell about it, to return to work.


Cornelius Baker is executive director of the National Association of People with AIDS (NAPWA) based in Washington, D.C., whose mission is to advocate for people living with HIV and AIDS. Baker explains: Suppose a prospective employer asks an applicant about a three-year gap in employment history. A person with cancer might reply with a story of chemotherapy and radiation, spending time with family during what were thought to be the remaining months, and preparing to die. The candidate would describe unexpectedly recovering from the illness, re-engaging in life, setting new priorities and finally wanting to return to work. Most HR people would see that as saying something about character. In many workplaces, the agency would plan time for the person to work back in.


Baker doubts that in many workplaces, the scenario would play out the same way for a person returning to work from an AIDS-related disability. His doubt arises from the experience of his organization’s members and from the following issues:


  • While the cancer patient is likely to be seen as a hero, the returning person with HIV or AIDS may re-introduce troubling issues to a workforce.
  • Neither cancer nor heart disease arouses fear of contagion among co-workers.
  • Most co-workers wouldn’t respond to news of other diagnoses with the intrusive, moralistic question, “How did you get it?”
  • Most people aren’t afraid to provide first aid to someone with cancer or heart disease.
  • Co-workers are unlikely to refuse to share work spaces or equipment with a person returning from another illness, yet those refusals still occur with HIV/AIDS, even in 1998.
Baker stresses that “once [a person with HIV] enters a workforce, we have to be as competitive as others. People with HIV don’t get any special breaks. But we don’t expect any special disregard either.” He defines “special disregard” as being viewed as a threat to others. “Special disregard” is an especially daunting prospect for someone who seeks to reclaim a full life after facing death, and sees how warmly others returning from their own private medical agonies are welcomed.

Employers can improve the chances for success of a person returning to work with HIV/AIDS by making sure that co-workers understand that HIV/AIDS doesn’t threaten anyone else’s health. Improve the chances even more by giving everyone returning to work with HIV/AIDS an informed mentor or support person who will ease the transition.


Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, p. 108.


Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

A Day in the Life of Kathy Davis Just Another Day in HR

If you’re old enough to remember the television series “Dragnet,” you no doubt remember the portentous opening: Underscored by the memorable theme music, star Jack Webb advised viewers that “The story you are about to see is true. The names have been changed … . “Well, what worked for “Dragnet” works for us, too. The story you’re about to read is true — in spirit. The narrative is based on the 874 responses to the “Day in the Life of HR” survey, mailed to 2,000 subscribers and posted on Workforce Online. The survey results were used to establish the events in a typical HR professional’s day; some license has been taken in the number and order of events for dramatic effect, and to show the breadth of HR’s responsibility. All the events in the story — the incidents, questions, challenges and successes — were reported by survey respondents. The characters and organization, however, have been invented to provide context for sharing the survey data and not intended to represent any specific people or organization. Dum-de-dum-dum-dum … .

Pre-dawn darkness:
It was hours before her alarm would sound, but Kathy Davis was awake. Her telephone had rung just after 3:00 a.m., and she had experienced escalating panic as she reached for the receiver. No one calls with good news at that hour.

It was a shift supervisor at the plant. “I’m sorry to wake you,” he began. She didn’t say it aloud, but Kathy gave him points for realizing the hour; this supervisor was a quick study. “We have a sexual harassment problem here … ” he continued. Kathy shook her head and held the receiver at a distance. She struggled to focus her vision on it, as if seeing it would somehow make this conversation credible.

“Sexual harassment?” she said, without listening to anything further. “Now?”

“Yes,” the supervisor said, and plunged on with his story. In her head, she deducted the points she had given him earlier. She fought her grogginess in an effort to care.

By the time he hung up a few minutes later, Kathy was fully awake. As often happened in these situations, however, she wasn’t really alert until she had missed most of what was said. She remembered something about a gender identity crisis and a security employee. She also remembered making an appointment to meet with him in the morning; she would have to go in early.

As she drifted back to sleep, Kathy thought about the absurdities she so often faced at work. When they make “HR: The Movie,” she thought, the guy who made “Terms of Endearment” and “As Good As It Gets” — James Brooks, wasn’t it? — should direct it. He could capture the swings between pathos and hilarity that characterize the job. And when they make it, she mused, Meg Ryan can play me.

5:45 a.m.
It rang on schedule, but the alarm was still a shock. Kathy stared at the ceiling for a time before forcing herself out of bed and into the bathroom. A quick glance in the mirror reminded her of the lost sleep. “OK, maybe not Meg Ryan,” she moaned. “Maybe Bea Arthur.”

Already the day had “crisis” written all over it, so Kathy rushed through her shower. Because she hadn’t reset her alarm, there would be no time for a leisurely breakfast or to read the newspaper. Instead, she turned on the TV news. There was more about the Clinton/Lewinsky mess, and Kathy wondered whether the White House HR staff got calls at 3:00 a.m. She had a few spoonfuls of dry cereal and some coffee, burning her tongue as she gulped too quickly en route to the car. No one in business school had warned her about these days.

6:30 a.m.
Kathy tossed her briefcase on the back seat, then got behind the wheel and fastened her seat belt. It was a little earlier than usual, so she hoped to beat some of the traffic. The radio was still set for the news station, but she wasn’t in the mood for more about Monica. She punched at the buttons, catching pieces of several commercials before finding Celine Dion wailing the song from “Titanic.” It was the kind of song that would let her map out the day in her mind.

6:50 a.m.
At this hour, open parking spots were not the fantasy they would become by 8:00 a.m. Kathy chose one indiscriminately and headed for the building, snaking her way through the parked cars. She was close to the entrance when she spotted something out of the corner of her eye. Should she investigate or keep moving? She thought about the disgruntled supervisor and sighed. He could wait. She looked again and confirmed what she had suspected: There was a pair of feet jutting out from behind a parked car, and they were pointed upright, like those of the Wicked Witch of the East after Dorothy’s house fell on her. Kathy had friends in HR who had faced employee deaths; she couldn’t believe she might have to deal with it. She walked along the length of the car before nervously peering around the bumper. A woman — with a company name badge around her neck — was sprawled out between two cars, and a car door was open. “Oh, my God!” Kathy said aloud.

She stepped carefully over the woman, then lifted her wrist. Please have a pulse, Kathy thought. It was there; Kathy began breathing again. She reached down and nudged the woman, gently. “Hello?” she asked. “Hello … Marge,” she read from the name badge. Slowly Marge shifted.

“Yes?” she answered.

“Are you OK?” Kathy asked.

“Course I’m OK,” the woman slurred. “It was a swell party.”

Kathy sighed. OK, she thought, much better drunk than dead. She pulled the keys from the ignition and dropped them into her pocket, then helped the woman back into her car, and made a mental note to call security.

7:10 a.m.
As Kathy rounded the corner to the HR department, she almost bumped into a young man. She apologized and then looked up to see that he was carrying a picket sign. “Unfair hiring! Who needs HR? Fire Kathy Davis” it read. Kathy looked at the man; it was the temp she had tried out for two days before deciding he wasn’t capable of filling in for the absent HR assistant.

“What are you doing here?” Kathy asked.

“Protesting,” he explained.

She looked again at the picket sign. A photo of her cut from the company newsletter was glued into the center of the ‘o’ in “who.” “You’re picketing me, personally?” she asked.

He nodded.

“I can’t deal with this right now,” she said. “I’m sorry. I have a meeting. I’ll let you know when we can talk.”

He started to object, but Kathy shot him her best third-grade-school-teacher look and kept moving. The disgruntled shift supervisor and a security staff member were outside her door.

Kathy turned on the lights in the department and invited them into her office, where she cleared some books off a chair so they could sit. She was barely into her chair when the story began. In a rush, the two of them — in often overlapping voices — told her what had happened. She managed to sort out that the security employee was having a “gender identification” crisis and was upset because a senior vice president had given him “the finger.”

“James Brooks, where are you?” Kathy mumbled to herself. The situation was ridiculous (“Maybe Bea Arthur could play … “she began to think, but stopped herself) when compared to the other issues on her agenda. But the man was clearly frightened, hurt, and feeling very alone. And certainly he deserved to be protected from actions that violated company policy.

Kathy got them both calmed down — plainly the supervisor had forgotten what to do when presented with a sexual harassment complaint — and took a complete report. She assured the employee she would investigate, and explained what that would involve. As Kathy was finishing her explanation Sue, a member of her team, opened the door.

“Kathy, there’s a man picketing outside … oh, I’m sorry,” she said. “I thought you were alone.”

“It’s OK, we’re finished here,” Kathy said. She told Sue about the drunken woman in the parking lot and asked Sue to escort the security employee to the EAP office. After they had gone, she reviewed the sexual harassment policy with the supervisor and sent him home.

7:55 a.m.
Alone at last! Kathy finally could begin her morning routine. She straightened a picture on the wall, then went down the hall for coffee and some water for her plants. Miraculously, no one stopped her, and she got away with a wave to the picketer.

Back in the office, she checked voice-mail. Already there were seven messages, and she knew that she might have three times that many by day’s end. She forwarded two to Sue, and returned the others; she was happy to leave voicemails each time.

On to e-mail. There were a dozen messages in her mailbox, and more — no doubt — on the way. She sighed as she scanned the messages:

  • Who is our health care provider?
  • I sent my resume to you last week … can you please advise me of the status?
  • How much sick time is available to me?
  • When will I get my green card?
  • Is this payday?

And on it went. One message made no sense (“Vacation days + sick days + holidays + flex hours = Yes?”) and she deleted it. Another was from the CEO. “While I’m thinking about it,” he wrote, “here’s a question that occurred to me: How will you invest in HR this year so that we have a better HR function than our competitors?” Great question, she thought to herself.

9:30 a.m.
But there wasn’t time to think about it now; she had too much to do this morning. First she reviewed her staff’s response to a recent FLSA audit; by responding promptly the company would save some money — perhaps as much as $250,000. The report was excellent, and she took a moment to pat herself on the back for building such a capable staff. It had taken several years, after first hiring some very wrong people. She shuddered at the memory.

The staff also had completed documentation showing bad faith by the company’s insurance carrier. That, too, would save the company money. Next she documented the morning’s meeting, then fired off an e-mail asking for an appointment with the executive vice president named by the security employee. She sighed. Would sexual harassment issues ever get resolved?

10:15 a.m.
She was interrupted by the intercom. “Kathy?” Sue asked.

“Yes?”

“Pete Channing is on line one. I think you should take it.”

“Got it. Pete? What’s up?”

“Good morning, Kathy. Have you made that offer yet?”

“Not yet. I have the offer letter here to review this afternoon.”

“Oh, good. I’ve changed my mind.”

Kathy rolled her eyes. Damn! They had sought the guy out, and it had taken weeks to get to this point. Even the guy’s background check had been clean. They couldn’t afford to lose this one. “What happened?”

“He had food stuck between his teeth.”

“Pardon me?”

“At our lunch together last week. This big piece of green stuff, right in front. It bothered me then, but I thought I could ignore it. I can’t.”

Food in his teeth? She clenched the armrest of her chair. “Oh, Pete, you were so sure of this guy.” She heard her voice squeaking, and cringed. “Stop it,” she thought to herself. “You’re not Ally McBeal.”

Pete explained his thinking. This guy didn’t reflect the company image, wasn’t professional … he droned on. “Did you point it out to him, Pete?” she asked. “Did he ever get near a mirror? Did he have any way of knowing?”

Pete doubted the guy knew. He argued half-heartedly that it didn’t matter, but Kathy cut him off. “Call him, Pete,” she said. “Tell him what happened and ask what he would have done if the situation had been reversed. That will tell you a lot. Do that before we change our course, OK?”

Pete agreed. She hung up and ran her hand through her hair. Another bullet dodged — for now.

She went back to working her way through the 4-inch stack of paper in her in-box.

11:40 a.m.
Kathy was good at delegating, but she also struggled with perfectionist tendencies. Earlier in the week the IS department had helped HR with a data dump, and the experts had assured her the data would be clean. Kathy’s intuition had told her otherwise, and she had decided to review the data anyway. This morning she was glad she had listened to that little voice. She had found only a handful of errors, but they had serious implications.

She was getting toward the end of the report when she was distracted by some commotion outside her office. “What now?” she wondered.

Kathy stepped into the HR department to find two members of the department restraining a well-dressed woman. The woman was screaming and struggling to get free; Sue was on the phone.

“What’s going on?” Kathy asked.

Linda, the company’s staffing professional, pointed at the woman in custody. “She choked me,” she said.

“Choked you?” Kathy asked Linda in disbelief.

Sue had hung up and nodded to Kathy. “Security’s on the way. I saw it myself … Linda was interviewing this woman, and then she stood up, walked around Linda’s desk and started choking her.”

“Actually, it was weirder than that,” Linda offered. “I had the results of the woman’s skills tests, and I planned to share them with her and suggest she get further training and reapply. I barely got started when she asked me to touch her face so I could see how excited she was about the job. I declined, and went on. When I started to talk about training, she stared a moment and mumbled something about children to feed. Then she started to choke me.”

This was a new one. An angry ex-employee had thrown hot coffee on Kathy once, but no one had resorted to hand-to-hand combat. Security arrived and escorted the woman out, after which Kathy invited Linda into her office. “I was surprised more than anything,” Linda said. “She wasn’t really hurting me, just expressing a lot of pent up frustration. It’s sad, really.”

Kathy thanked Linda for handling the situation so professionally and asked if she’d like to take the afternoon off. Linda said she was fine and returned to her office. Kathy knew she would have to consult the corporate attorney about whether to press charges against the woman. She looked at her watch; wasn’t it lunch time yet? It was.

12:25 p.m.
In the morning rush Kathy had forgotten to pack anything, so she decided to go to the local supermarket and hit the salad bar. On the way out, she offered to pick something up for the picketer, but he declined. She was gone only a few minutes, but she was relieved to find calm in the department. As she ate, she reviewed the offer letter to Pete’s candidate. Then she pulled the latest issue of Workforce out of her in-box and read the cover story on HR’s future. “I love that magazine,” she thought to herself.

1:20 p.m.
After lunch she checked messages again. There was an e-mail inquiring whether Kathy would work with the city to change the timing of the traffic signal in front of the office building, so that leaving would take one two-minute light change and not two two-minute light changes. “I’ll get right on that,” Kathy thought to herself. There was a voice-mail asking for help reading a bus schedule; that one went to Sue.

And there was an e-mail from a supervisor advising her that one of his employees “would be absent from work for a few weeks while a felony morals charge was worked out.” Worked out? She wondered how one “worked out” a felony charge. And why was she only hearing about this now? She picked up the telephone to call the supervisor.

1:55 p.m.
Kathy had a 2:00 p.m. meeting with Henry Luker, the CEO. “I’m going down the hall,” she told Sue. On the way out, she called over her shoulder, “Before I die, I’m going to understand how and why people decide to involve HR. Either I get trivia, or the big stuff never surfaces.”

Henry kept her waiting only a couple of minutes. They had worked together for the 14 months since he was brought in to assume the top job. Kathy joked early on that he was the “new breed of CEO” who actually understood HR and valued its contribution. In turn, Henry joked that she represented the “new breed of HR” who saw the function as more than administrative and worked to make their businesses better.

They started the conversation with Kathy’s summary of the reports she had reviewed earlier in the day. They discussed progress on the plan to improve participation in the company’s 401(k) plan. Next came a lengthy discussion about employee turnover.

The discussion had begun two weeks earlier. Kathy had expressed her frustration at the problems HR faced hiring enough people to staff the manufacturing facility for the company’s new product. At the same meeting, Henry had raised the possibility of layoffs in another plant because sales of the product made there were declining. Kathy had balked at that, sharing that the company had a history of layoffs followed by hiring. The pattern was expensive and demoralizing. Henry had then suggested that Kathy do some research, to find out what the company had paid in severance over a five-year period.

Today, Kathy was ready with the information. “What I found is that the amount we paid in severance over the period was often higher than the profits made on new ventures,” she explained. “It also affected cash flow in several key quarters. Call me crazy, but I’d say those results aren’t ideal.”

Together they reviewed the numbers. Henry could see what Kathy was describing, and they agreed that it wasn’t healthy. He asked what Kathy suggested they do.

“Well, I did some other research and realized that some of the people we laid off at one plant were later hired at another,” she said. “I also found that the cycle of hiring and layoffs was pretty predictable as the product mix changed. I think we could help solve this problem if we could transfer employees from one location to another, instead of downsizing. We can’t do it now because we don’t know what skills our people have, so we’d need to upgrade our software. And we could do better still if we started cross-training on the skills people need in the new plants. Without that, some layoffs are inevitable.”

They talked further and Henry agreed to postpone any layoffs until Kathy had done some further research; she agreed to explore the software and training options and return with a proposal. In the meantime, she would talk with others on the management team.

On her way out, she paused and turned around. “Oh, Henry,” she added with a smile, “great question this morning. Let me do some benchmarking sometime between the crises and the histrionics. I’ll get back to you.”

3:00 p.m.
Kathy headed back to her office. She would be a few minutes late already for her appointment to shadow the manufacturing facilities manager, but she was eager to share her thoughts about the training and skills inventory.

Sue offered that no one in HR had been attacked in the last hour and gave Kathy permission to leave. “One quick question — does our health plan cover penile implants? Someone wants to know,” she smiled wickedly.

“Only if it would be necessary to perform essential job functions,” Kathy shot back on the way out.

3:15 p.m.
It was a short drive to the manufacturing facility. On her way in, a man stopped her. She remembered him from a supervision-training course offered several months earlier.

“Kathy, I’m so glad I ran into you. I’ve been meaning to call,” he said.

“Is there a problem?” she asked.

“No, not at all. I was going to call and say thanks. That training class has really helped me. There are fewer misunderstandings and the staff seems to respect me more. It’s made such a difference, I can’t tell you. Thank you.”

“You’re welcome,” she said. “Now maybe you can stop calling me Catbert.”

The man looked sheepish and shifted awkwardly. “You weren’t supposed to know about that,” he said.

“I know all,” Kathy laughed. “Take care, OK?”

The plant manager was waiting for her. She had been shadowing him for several hours a week, at different times of day and at different points in the production process, for several weeks. Kathy’s goal was to learn firsthand what the employee-related issues were in running the plant, so that she could develop a role for HR. An HR professional would then be assigned to the facility. If it helped, HR professionals eventually would be assigned to all business units.

At the outset, the manager had been skeptical. But Kathy had selected this plant because the manager had a reputation for being more ambitious and more open to learning than some others. Over time, he had concluded that she was serious about helping him and capable enough to do so.

Kathy apologized for being late, and offered to share some of her conversation with the CEO. She reiterated much of the conversation about layoffs, severance, reassignments and training. She reassured the manager that his plant wasn’t the one targeted for layoffs, but he knew that could change.

“If we could solve the layoff/hiring cycle, it would really help morale around here,” he said. “And there would be many rewards to that.”

Kathy agreed, and told him they would discuss it further. For now, however, Kathy wanted to be sure that they spent some time on the floor.

They spent the next couple of hours observing and asking questions. Kathy talked to several employees and asked about their jobs. She asked what obstacles they faced in doing a good job. She asked the manager to identify top performers she could observe.

At the end of the allotted time, Kathy told the manager that she thought they were 30 days away from having the formal job description for the new HR position, and that they would then begin hiring. In the meantime, she said she would like to begin bringing others from her department to participate in the shadowing.

“One of them may really connect with the issues over here and want to come do this job,” she explained. “If not, they’ll still learn things that will be helpful in their current jobs.”

5:40 p.m.
The HR department was quiet when she got back. The picketer was still patrolling the hall, but the others had gone home.

Sue had left a note advising her that she had set up an appointment for the following morning with two employees and their supervisor. The employees had gotten into a fight in an elevator; one had armed herself with a juice bottle and the other with an umbrella. Kathy sighed. “I can’t wait to hear what that was about,” she thought.

Her e-mail messages were the usual assortment. An employee whose vacation request had been denied demanded to know why the company had a right to expect that he schedule his vacation in advance. One employee wanted to cover his mother on the company’s health plan; another wanted coverage for his cat. There was an e-mail in all caps from an employee raging that someone had parked in her regular spot, and threatening to take her complaint “all the way to the CEO” if Kathy didn’t resolve it. And an employee was asking for an appointment because his supervisor had asked him to buy illegal drugs for her. There was nothing from the finger-wielding vice president; she could tell this situation wasn’t going to be easy.

She fared only slightly better on voicemail. Pete Channing left a message that he had talked to the job candidate with food in his teeth. “Your advice was great,” Pete said. “He was very professional. Apologized and explained to me how he would have handled it in my place. His idea was better then mine. So please go ahead and make the offer.”

And then there was one from an irate former employee. He had been terminated for stealing, which he admitted to, but still felt he was wronged. He had threatened to sue from the beginning, but had called today to announce he had figured out a plan. “I will sell my blood to make enough money to sue you!” he shouted into the telephone.

Kathy put down the receiver. All of this could wait until tomorrow.

5:50 p.m.
Kathy gathered her things together and turned out the lights in the department. In the hall, she paused and turned to the picketer. “See you in the morning?” she asked.

He nodded.

“Have a good evening,” she said.

6:40 p.m.
After stops at the dry cleaner and the greeting card store, Kathy pulled into her driveway. “What a day,” she sighed.

She put some pasta on the stove and did some simple chores while it cooked. Finally, after 7:00 p.m., time was her own. She sat down to dinner, a glass of wine and the new Grisham novel. She read for more than an hour before getting up to wash the dishes. Then it was time to watch “ER.”

10:10 p.m.
“Please,” Kathy thought as her head hit the pillow. “No sexual harassment complaint calls at 3:00 a.m.”

Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, pp. 56-62.

Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Managers Use Internet and Networking To Find New Positions

Yeah, they’ll skim the paper, drop by the occasional job fair. But professional-level employees will not stop there. They turn to the Internet—and to their peers—to not only search for jobs, but search for the right company offering those jobs. Employees today are a more jaded, cynical breed. They know the recruiting spin, so make sure whatever you tell them is true, because they’ll find out.


Take Kevin Daniels, a marketing manager in Memphis, for example. When job searching, he first heads to the Internet to several job-bank sites. When he finds a position that sounds promising, he stays on the Internet, searching news groups for information on the company. “I do Internet media searches to find employers with a strong commitment to internal promotion,” he says. “And to make sure they don’t have bad downsizing records.”


Similarly, Alice Dawson, a business consultant in Dallas, is networking to find her next position. She dials up career groups for women to get the skinny on employers’ work-life balance; she goes online to poll women’s career groups. She wants to find a company whose culture backs up its work-life policies. “Companies will always tell you they do, but then you get there and the whole atmosphere says it’s not OK to leave early. So I talk to all the working moms I can to find companies that honor their word. And I’m still looking . . .”


Where will your company get the most bang for its recruiting buck? To reach managerial-level employees, a good reputation beats the flashiest promotions. Make it easier on searchers by posting not just PR on your company Web site, but any good press you’ve had—even if it doesn’t directly pertain to employment.


Don’t let incoming resumes lie fallow, says Tennessee job-search coach Tracy Bumpus. Lately, Bumpus says, professionals who admire a company are submitting their resumes whether they’ve seen a job posting or not. “They figure in this job market, the company’s going to need to hire sooner or later,” she says.


Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, p. 48.


Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

A Day in the Life of John Harvey Positioning HR for the Fast Track

Thursday, April 9


New York City—Author E.B. White once wrote: “New York is the concentrate of art and commerce and sport and religion and entertainment and finance, bringing to a single compact arena the gladiator, the evangelist, the promoter, the actor, the trader and the merchant.” He didn’t mention HR. But John F. Harvey fits the Manhattan profile. As vice president/relationship leader of human resources for Corporate Services at American Express Co., Harvey’s a little bit of each. He has to be. If you can’t sell HR as a business partner, why bother to board a train and ferry to work every day from Maplewood, New Jersey? “I love my job,” he says.


Corporate Services, Harvey explains, is the business-to-business division of the company that helps mid-sized and large companies—and government agencies—manage their travel and purchasing expenditures. He assumed his current position in January 1997 and is responsible for HR management, supporting 12,400 employees who represent Corporate Services clients domestically. The company underwent a reorganization last year, he says, that better aligns the business units by customer segments, rather than regions. His mission is to get the right people on the project teams to achieve his division’s business goals. Harvey reports to Bonnie Stedt, executive vice president/senior relationship leader—with a dotted line to Edward P. Gilligan, president of Corporate Services—and one of AMEX’ top 18 business executives.


When I arrive at his office on the 40th floor of the World Financial Center, he greets me with a friendly handshake. Harvey seats me facing the Manhattan skyline, and begins to quickly articulate the company’s recent reorganization. I joke with him to slow down, explain a few company expressions, such as “business utilities,” or “centers of excellence”—to little avail. He’s wired, and I’m thinking, “If only I knew shorthand.” Thank God, I wore comfortable shoes. By the end of my afternoon with Harvey, I’m awestruck at the sheer size of this organization. I wonder how anyone really functions in such a maze. “That was one of my concerns when I interviewed for this job. But I discovered that AMEX isn’t overly bureaucratic at all. We’re given a lot of room to make decisions,” he says.


6:30 a.m.
Early commute from the ‘burbs.
An early wake-up. Says goodbye to his wife and four children; catches a train to the Hoboken ferry. Normally, he would read The New York Times. But this morning, he runs into a colleague on the train. “We got into a great discussion about the public sector.” Upon arriving by ferry at the World Financial Center—downtown at 200 Vesey Street, near the Hudson River, Harvey stops at Minters for a blueberry crumb muffin and coffee (with milk and one cube of sugar).


7:50 a.m.
Arrival at the office.
Checks e-mail. Approximately 20 messages have accumulated since 6:30 p.m. the previous day. “I try to check in every two hours,” he says. The drawings on the wall next to his desk show he’s a proud daddy. His daughter Corinne has drawn him with a white face, yellow eyes, pink nose and gray lips. His son, John, on the other hand, has painted Harvey as a blockhead with a yellow face, pink eyes and a green mouth. He laughs at the contrasting images.


We spend some time reviewing the day’s itinerary. On an average day, he says, he attends approximately five meetings. They include anything from big-picture planning to developmental projects. Meetings usually run between 30 minutes and one hour. He knows his objectives for every meeting, and hands a list of them to me before we’re off and running.


9:00 a.m.
Leadership and development.
Brisk walk across the building’s North Bridge toward the World Trade Center. We walk five minutes from AMEX headquarters to another building the company leases on Broadway. (He believes in going to his internal customers’ office.)


His objective: To review service delivery and drivers of employee satisfaction, and finalize HR commitments to supporting business initiatives.


Harvey and two other colleagues review what Corporate Services refers to as “The Stand.” This vision statement is based on an annual Employee Survey, which measures employee satisfaction in a number of key areas. Three key goals of “The Stand” include: Making people incredibly successful; inspiring intense customer loyalty; and continually transforming entire industries. These elements, he says, must be aligned with the “drivers for leadership and development”—what employees say they want most from an employer: “I feel I can grow and progress with my company,” “My job gives me a sense of personal accomplishment” and “Management treats employees with respect and dignity.


“In the course of one hour, they discuss: how “The Stand” leads to capabilities, which in turn lead to competencies and behaviors; team training effectiveness; and relooking at the current reward structures. After engaging his colleagues, Harvey calls for the action/follow-up plans while tapping his pen on a notepad. “Remember our theme is coaching and giving feedback. Team leaders often get too tied up with administrivia.”


11:00 a.m.
Competency models. Quick walk back to Harvey’s office. One colleague already is in the office. Another joins in via conference call.


His objective: To update progress on deployment of the Corporate Services leadership model and determine linkage with competency modeling group.


Harvey keys in on talent assessments for mid-level managers. He observes that 10 years ago, “A good leader was a good leader.” However, in today’s business world, HR is challenged to meet that pace with a more multi-skilled workforce. (To the manager of quality services in Phoenix): “Greg, where are we? Is there any issue we need to work through?” “Peg, (Wagner, vice president of competency modeling) jump in.” The three talk about “mapping up,” moving competencies “across the Blue Box (AMEX’ values statement). To shorten the cycle time, Harvey suggests designing a development model and implementing it at the same time in one unit. “Here’s the approach: Develop, deploy, develop, deploy, finalize—then go out and apply.”


11:45 a.m.
Mentoring a new director.
His objective: To orient an employee to a new role, review orientation plan, goals, expectations and “The Stand.”


Since winning the U.S. Government account in 1993, American Express services more than 1.3 million federal employees who use the Government Card for official travel. Jackie Bennett has recently been hired as new director/relationship leader supporting government services and the corporate purchasing card group. Via conference call, Harvey reviews the orientation plan—a customized plan he has designed for her. It includes “action steps,” “contacts to meet” (in some categories, as many as 13 individuals), their “job titles” and the “scheduled completed date.” They review one of the action steps: “Spend time with each government service and corporate purchasing card direct report individually to gain an understanding of their business, gain an understanding of key HR challenges and to initiate the development of an effective working relationship. Harvey simplifies her tasks by explaining the benefit of talking to specific individuals. “Talk to Courtney. She’s a good thought leader.”


He also reminds her: “You have to prioritize day to day. And I’m also worried about work/life balance. You set the pace for others. So take immediate steps to post a job for administrative support. Send me what I need to sign off quickly.”


“Sounds great!” Bennett’s voice rings through the speakerphone.


12:30 p.m.
Marketing new technology.
His objective: Review the latest multimedia presentation developed by two senior internal business consultants from Learning and Development, Alicia Mandel and Greg Davis.


Harvey reviews a presentation of a new tool to sell Corporate Services products. Patting themselves on the back, the group says it’s the best application of Lotus Notes™ ever applied in the company.


Davis is oozing with enthusiasm at the possibility of presenting the tools onsite or sending along the software to clients. “I’m so excited!” he says. What the group realizes is that they’ve created a product that can be used throughout the organization—and eventually outside the company. Harvey reiterates “The Stand”: “We have the capability to develop internally. Now, we can market the learning and development capability to transform entire industries.”


1:30 p.m.
His objective: To devour our sandwiches as quickly as possible.


We lunch in the company cafeteria and tour the corporate Fitness Center, where Harvey often spends his lunch hour. He walks up to the counter to check the computerized records of employee’s exercise activity. Big smile. He’s made it on the list of Top 100 calorie burners.


2:30 p.m.
Attends coaching session on team effectiveness.


4:00 p.m.
Reviews global service capabilities.


5:00 p.m.
It’s a wrap-up: Checks e-mail and phone messages.


6:40 p.m.
Boards ferry to Hoboken, New Jersey.


7:06 p.m.
Boards train from Hoboken to Maplewood.


7:35 p.m.
Enjoys dinner with the family. Helps three older kids ages 7, 10, and 13, with homework—nothing as tough as HR.


8:45 p.m.
Plays platform tennis with friends.


10:00 p.m.
Watches evening news.


10:30 p.m.
Lights out!


Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, pp. 64-68.


Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Incredible But True The Dumbest Questions Asked of HR by CEOs

Oh, those CEOs—can’t live with ’em, can’t live without ’em. That might be your conclusion, anyway, after reading the dumbest things CEOs have asked of HR. We tried to ignore the popular holdovers from last year: There are still a lot of CEOs wondering how much money they make, and an alarming number who are all too eager to fire the ill, the potentially ill, the unattractive or the legally protected. But that left us with plenty of dumb questions to choose from. Although a diplomatic few protested that there are no dumb questions, one reader said simply, “Pick a day—get a dumb question.” Here are our favorites—plus some responses we’d have been hard-pressed to keep to ourselves had we been asked:


  1. All of our employees are happy here, aren’t they? I am!
    Well, yes, all the employees with huge salaries, stock options, complete autonomy, a reserved parking space and a private office are happy.
  2. Am I paying you enough for what you do?
    Actually, I’ve been meaning to speak to you about that …
  3. Wanna go play video games?
    Sure! How about if we go after I finish this game of solitaire and before the afternoon talk shows come on?
  4. Do I have to put my sick leave down on the time sheet?
    I guess not. We don’t mark down the times you make us sick.
  5. Do we really have to pay overtime if a person says he will work for free?
    I guess it depends on whether we really have to respond if the government charges us with labor law violations.
  6. Do you think women find it offensive when I laugh at their suggestions?
    I don’t know. Do you find it offensive when they laugh at your suggestions?
  7. Is the Internet open 24 hours a day?
    Yes, but you’ll need the special after-hours password.
  8. What color are my eyes?
    They’re about to be black and blue.
  9. Why do I need to talk to employees? Can’t you handle that?
    Sure, if I can tell them what I really think.
  10. Why don’t you tell your husband to quit his job to take care of errands for you?
    The concept isn’t bad. Maybe you could quit your job and take care of errands for me.

Workforce, June 1999, Vol. 78, No. 6, p. 40.


Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Informal Learning Gets Results

It could be as simple as installing white boards prominently and keeping them stocked with markers for quick shift change notes, or as complicated as explaining subtle company culture characteristics. Both are examples of informal learning, which happens naturally in the workplace, for good or ill. People learn when to speak up and when not to. They make jokes about mission statements or live by the principles. They feel good about coming to work, and feel successfully challenged when they get there. Or they feel frustrated and complain or quit.


“A lot of our institutions are organized in ways that stand between people and learning,” says Ellen O’Brien Saunders, director of Washington State’s Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board. The board was a partner in a two-year, $1.6 million study of more than 1,000 employees at seven companies in seven states.


U.S. businesses, according to the Department of Labor, spend up to $50 billion annually on formal training programs, with another $70 billion on indirect wage and salary costs when workers are at such sessions and not on the job. This new study suggests that training could produce far better results if its designers recognized what, how and why people already are learning at the workplace, in meetings, on breaks and in customer interactions.


Such informal learning is spontaneous, immediate and task-specific. Eventually, harnessing it could save billions of dollars for government and industry.


“The study has profound implications on corporate culture, worker satisfaction, productivity and improving the rate of innovation,” reports Monika Aring, director of the Center for Workforce Development, a nonprofit organization affiliated with the Education Development Center in Newton, Massachusetts, which conducted the extensive study.


Their findings could have significant effects on everything from private sector competitiveness to how welfare-to-work programs are structured.


Informal learning yields best results.
Despite increasing allocations of time and money to formal training over the past decade, researchers discovered that up to 70 percent of learning actually takes place informally. Informal learning is defined as “any learning that occurs in which the learning process isn’t determined or designed by the organization,” Aring stresses. Formal training includes both an expressed organization goal and a defined process. Informal learning can occur whether or not there’s an expressed goal, and, when it works best, serves individual as well as corporate objectives. For example, informal learning might best occur when a mentor shows a new employee how to use a machine through an actual demonstration-rather than through a classroom presentation.


To reach these conclusions, the daily work life of many was scrutinized closely. Teams of researchers from different academic disciplines descended on the designated companies, sometimes trying to inconspicuously shadow employees, other times organizing focus groups (among other techniques) to get people to explain how they do their jobs, how they learn and how they convey information to others. The pilot study was done at Motorola in Illinois, widely regarded as an excellent “Teaching Firm,” another concept developed by EDC upon which the new study builds.


“The [teams] wanted to be able to walk into a factory anytime,” recalls Jim Frasier, learning research and evaluation manager of Motorola University in Schaumberg. “When they got here, they stood around in different places and watched what was happening. They sat down in cafeterias. We didn’t lead them. That was part of the novelty. They were ethnographic researchers. They asked questions, they observed and actually worked on the lines and saw how workers helped other workers.”


From the massive database, Aring and her colleagues developed diagrams, which they call taxonomies, to illustrate the detailed research and analysis. (See the sidebar “What Employees Learn Informally” on page 34.)


“That’s the power of this report,” says Frasier. “That big matrix is a real gold mine. That matrix is what everybody keeps talking about.”


After their techniques were refined at Motorola, researchers recruited six state governments that in turn selected one company each to study in-depth. The U.S. Department of Labor, the six states and the Pew Charitable Trusts funded the study at these sites: Boeing Commercial Airplane Group in Seattle; Siemens Power Transmission and Distribution, LLC in Raleigh, North Carolina; Reflexite North America in New Britain, Connecticut; Data Instruments in Acton, Massachusetts; Merry Mechanization, Inc. in Englewood, Florida; and Ford Electronics in Lansdale, Pennsylvania.


“The company is going through a major transformation,” says Barry Blystone, director of training and development for Siemens in North Carolina. “It’s critical that its workforce keep learning and be flexible.” Most of what he’s using is coming out of the taxonomies, he adds. “The biggest value overall is reinforcing the culture change that’s going on. We’re moving beyond empowerment to the point at which you’re truly trying to put decision-making capability into the hands of the people who really do the work; it’s up to them to manage their own careers within the structures the company has designed. It’s not only telling people they can do it but showing them how.”


Creating a learning environment takes planning.
All the managers we interviewed agreed that managers must establish an environment conducive to informal learning from the physical space to the emotional climate. “It doesn’t just happen,” Blystone says. His biggest human resources challenge is building competency models and training programs that work in this fast-moving environment. Employees must be encouraged to actively foster learning themselves.


Siemens, for example, is used to dealing with young entry-level people, but is finding that software developers constitute an ever-larger percentage of its workforce. These employees often work quite independently and do not always see the relevance of teams. Nonetheless, re-searchers found teams were actually one of the richest sources of informal learning. Software developers, however, are prime examples of people who need to be able to interact with customers so new products find a ready market.


At Siemens, like many other companies, most of the learning used to take place in an unsystematic way, grabbing a veteran to show a newcomer the ropes. Then the pendulum swung to formal training sessions, with uniform standards, but managers found it impractical and unproductive to have people off the line for long periods. Now, Blystone is trying to merge the best ideas and practices of formal and informal learning.


The researchers found that some “obvious” steps managers had been taking to reduce “wasted” time, such as discouraging people from congregating in the cafeteria, are actually counterproductive. Now, some managers have placed tools in these areas to take advantage of the work-related brainstorming going on there amidst talk of sports, families and personal problems.


Several companies have recently installed high round tables, like those found in latte bars, so people can perch on stools or can stand during impromptu meetings.


Share failures and success.
Researchers also discovered that at some sites meetings aren’t dreaded, but produce the kind of epiphanies and morale boosts that lead to happier, more productive workers. A culture that encourages employees not only to learn from their own mistakes, but to talk about them openly also is helpful. Engineering groups at Siemens now are encouraged to share failures as well as successes.


At The Boeing Commercial Airplane Group based in Seattle, John Panattoni states the first step in implementing findings of the report will be bringing in 30 teacher interns for six weeks. Each will be responsible for working on a project to redesign tech-prep curriculum to focus on ways to be receptive to informal learning opportunities. Formal training will continue in safety areas. Aring says that’s an example of where formal training is best.


Identifying and teaching cultural aspects is more difficult, Panattoni says. Even in the commercial airplane group, there are differences in subgroups, both geographically and by function. “Cultural knowledge clearly is something that’s communicated mostly informally,” he says. “We try to understand what they need to prosper and grow. But there are so many different nuances.”


However difficult it may be, harnessing informal learning is an important part of the commercial airplane group’s 10-year strategy. At Boeing, researchers found that teaming, personal documentation (such as e-mails and other notes), supervisor-employee relationships and shift changes were all fairly rich areas of informal learning.


But trainers must keep in mind that individuals learn in different ways. Most education and training programs focus on just one dimension: the practical. Nothing wrong with that, say Aring and her colleagues, but that approach ignores three other critical dimensions: intrapersonal skills, such as stress management and critical thinking; interpersonal skills, such as offering and accepting constructive feedback; and cultural awareness. HR directors are especially valuable in this process because a key finding is that culture has everything to do with the quality of the informal learning. In companies with the strongest connection between the expressed and experienced culture, informal learning provides the best results. The worst connections are in companies where the expressed culture is far different from what the employees report they experience. Company leaders may say they applaud risk-taking. But at a meeting, an employee takes a risk and gets a discouraging response. “That worker and all those who are watching him or her found out, ‘Hey, wait a minute. We better not do these things, ‘” Aring says.


That ‘ahah’ moment is crucial.
Preliminary findings showed “small but statistically significant positive relationships between informal learning and production performance.” With the research phase over, Aring and colleagues are testing an assessment tool. The value of the study, according to experts interviewed, is in attracting and energizing a workforce that’s ready and motivated to learn.


“When I learned about this research, I was excited because first of all, intuitively, it made sense that people are sentient creatures, we’re learning all the time, for good or ill,” says Saunders, whose goal is to spread the word. “My dream is that in a year’s time the phrases informal learning and the teaching firm would begin to approximate the basic workplace skills.”


There’s still an important place for formal learning, she says, but it needs reinforcing back in the workplace where the most startling productivity gains could be made.


To successfully use the study results, Saunders says CEOs need to experience that ‘ahah!’ moment and unite operations, organizational development, HR and training. Managers and HR trainers will have to figure out where, why and how informal learning is taking place in their own companies, and then, adds Frasier, ask the crucial questions: “Do we need to help this any more or leave this alone? If we leave it alone, how do we know that it’s at the right intensity?”


“There’s no cookie-cutter applications,” Saunders concludes.


Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, pp. 30-34.

Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

A Day in the Life of HR1998

Pity the obsessive-compulsive HR professional who tries to keep a neat calendar or to maintain an orderly schedule. According to our survey, “A Day in the Life of HR,” it’s hardly possible. How could it be, when the average day is part crisis management and part strategic planning, includes at least one meeting but possibly not lunch, and requires interacting with employees, line managers, the CEO, vendors, consultants, and a couple of people who may be certifiably crazy? No, the average day is not orderly. But it is dynamic, challenging and ultimately rewarding.


This special report will show you just how dynamic, challenging and rewarding from several different points of view. The foundation of the report is the survey itself, which traces the average HR professional from the time he or she gets up in the morning until long past “ER” in the evening. The numbers show that HR is still in transition from administrative function to strategic business partner. The analysis shows that the transition is succeeding, and the evidence is everywhere from your ready access to CEOs to an image very different from Catbert, the Evil HR Director.


The results also form the framework for “A Day in the Life of Kathy Davis.” She isn’t real, but the circumstances and events in Kathy’s story are drawn from your responses. The “typical” Thursday Kathy endures has been exaggerated for dramatic effect and humor, but it offers an accurate picture of the breadth of HR’s responsibilities and the challenges of the job.


Although Kathy lives only in our imagination, the five HR professionals who allowed our writers to shadow them for a day are very real. They work in organizations as disparate as Denver International Airport and Patagonia. If Kathy’s story shows the commonalities that characterize the HR profession today, these portraits make it clear that HR also is very much shaped by specific business goals and corporate values.


Last, but not least, we invite you to laugh and learn, to cry and cringe. The survey included some open-ended questions, and hundreds of you were willing to confess the biggest mistakes of your careers, to point fingers at clueless employees and CEOs and to share other stories that bring HR vividly to life.


We hope you find “A Day in the Life of HR” a day you won’t soon forget.


Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, pp. 55-56.


Posted on June 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Tips for Re-integrating Employees

When people want to return to work after battling a serious illness, the last thing they need to do is battle negative workplace policies, practices and attitudes that could be changed with HR’s proactive attention and help. Following are five of the most important steps employers should take in making the transition stage for returning workers more successful.


  • Communicate with existing and prospective employees in plain English (or plainly in the languages your employees use) about what the policy does and doesn’t allow. Most people don’t “speak insurance” and don’t understand the “explanation of benefits” published by insurers.
  • Spell out the provisions of your disability insurance coverage with the “return-to-work” phenomenon in mind, so that prospective employees and recruiters who interview them can know right away how to calculate their risk.
  • Make sure employees know about the provisions of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which provides for up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to deal with a personal or family medical crisis.
  • Educate employees about people returning to work after battling a life-threatening illness, explaining why they pose no threat to anyone else’s health. Of course, never disclose the specific diagnoses of any individuals. This should be part of your general education and training of employees.
  • Think about your attitude before you ask about that gap in the candidate’s employment history. Are you able to welcome back into productive worklife a person who has faced down a life-threatening illness—and won? What’s the attitude toward returning to work from disability leave among your interviewers and recruiters? Will they deny you access to this skilled, highly-motivated labor force?

Workforce, June 1998, Vol. 77, No. 6, p. 106.


Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 536 Page 537 Page 538 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress