Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on April 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Being Cool Isn’t a Sacrifice

Cool is an AND, not an EITHER/OR. That’s what I concluded, anyway, after I first read Shari Caudron’s cover story on being cool. Shari observed that some companies are known to be cool, and that they are more appealing to top talent than those companies that aren’t. She set out to learn what makes those companies cool and what the implications are for HR.


What she found is that cool, in a business context, is a concept that reflects six separate components: respect for work/life balance, a sense of purpose, diversity, integrity, participatory management and a learning environment. She cites many examples of how these elements contribute to cool, and she makes it clear that any organization—regardless of size, industry or location—can attain them.


Jerry Hirshberg, president of Nissan Design International Inc., best articulates what links these seemingly disparate ideas. “Nothing about cool is conforming,” he says. “Cool respects the individual.”


That’s where the AND comes in. There’s nothing new about EITHER/OR vs. AND, of course. But writers James C. Collins and Jerry I. Porras explore the concept to provocative effect in their book, “Built to Last.” The book is the result of years of research and summarizes the qualities that the authors contend separate companies that succeed over the long haul from those that don’t.


Collins and Porras argue that chief among these qualities is rejecting the “Tyranny of the OR” (which pushes people to believe things must be either A or B, as in change OR stability) and instead embracing the “Genius of the AND” (which is the ability to embrace two extremes at the same time, as in a relatively fixed core ideology AND vigorous change and movement).


It’s easy to see how this dynamic applies to cool. For a long time, Corporate America operated under the assumption that meeting common business goals was best served through conformity. The Organization Man in his gray flannel suit is the icon of this sort of thinking.


More recently, we’ve gone through a period of celebrating individuality. Decorated T-shirts, personalized license plates and do-your-own-thing fashion are some symbols of people’s desire to be seen as distinct from the crowd. At work, the move away from conformity has taken many forms, among them diversity programs, individual career development, personalized 401(k) investments and more.


Both perspectives were nurtured as people succumbed to the “Tyranny of the OR.” You can almost hear the thinking: “We can focus on the group OR on individuals” or “We can be ourselves OR we can work toward a common goal.”


Increasingly, however, organizations are learning that it’s possible—even desirable—to embrace employees’ individuality and to work toward common goals. Those that do it best are the companies perceived as cool.


Seeing the “Genius of the AND” may be the natural outgrowth of the sea of changes in the workplace, such as increased focus on results and a growing reliance on analysis, creativity and individual thought. Whatever has contributed to the change, it turns out that those companies in which employees focus on common values and also feel free to be themselves are more successful at attracting and retaining top people, and they grow much faster than the average. Now that’s cool.

Workforce, April 1998, Vol. 77, No. 4, p. 4.

Posted on April 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Glossary of 401(k) Terminology

401(k): A savings plan that serves as a tax-deferred investment and personal pension fund for employees. (The name refers to the relevant section in the tax code.)


403(b): A tax-sheltered annuity that serves as a retirement plan for employees of tax-exempt organizations and public schools who aren’t able to participate in section 401(k) plans. It also is referred to as a TSA plan.


Asset allocation: The division of holdings among different types of assets, such as domestic stocks, international stocks, bonds, real estate and cash.


Bear market: A stock market in which prices decline over a prolonged period of time, producing losses for investors.


Bull market: A market in which stocks increase in price, thus producing gains for investors.


Employee stock ownership plan (ESOP): A qualified retirement plan designed to give workers an ownership stake in the company. Companies contribute shares of stock without requiring employees to invest their own money.


Employee stock purchase plan (ESPP): A plan established by a company that permits employees to buy company stock, usually at a discount.


Employer contribution: An incentive for employees to save for retirement. The employer typically matches a worker’s contribution, or a portion of it.


Guaranteed investment contract (GIC): An investment contract, funding agreement or guaranteed interest contract in which an insurance company agrees to guarantee a fixed or variable rate of interest or a future payment that’s based on an index or similar criteria. A GIC is payable at a predetermined date on funds that are deposited with the insurance company without regard to the continuance of human life.


Pension plan: A retirement plan offered by some employers that pays a set amount each year during retirement.


Qualified retirement plan: Any of several types of plans that have been approved by the IRS for tax-favorable treatment. These include: 401(k)s, SEPs, IRAs, Keoughs, SIMPLEs, defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution pension plans and more. Each plan has a different limit on the amount an employee and employer can contribute.


SOURCE: Quicken.com Financial Network


Workforce, April 1998, Vol. 77 No. 4, p. 76.

Posted on April 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Can You Be Cool in Omaha The Article’s Author Thinks Yes!

When I began to research this story, I assumed that cool would be defined very differently depending on the region of the country in which you worked. What I discovered is that the characteristics of cool companies — diversity, integrity and respect — are universal. A company in Omaha could, believe it or not, be just as cool as a company in San Francisco.

Take Milwaukee-based Harley-Davidson, a Rust Belt manufacturing company if there ever was one. Employees just love building them “Hawgs” because the company is such a great place to work. Voluntary turnover is just 3 percent annually.

However, I also discovered that there are slight differences between geographic regions in terms of the attributes of cool that are considered most important.

Lynn Taylor, vice president and director of staffing at Robert Half International Inc., one of the world’s largest specialized staffing firms, put a call out to her regional directors to find out if the characteristics of cool employers differed much by region. Here’s what she discovered:

“In [California’s] Silicon Valley, the bar has been raised as far as coolness,” Taylor explains. “People here are already accustomed to a high level of progressive practices, so companies have to be even more entrepreneurial than usual to attract top-notch people.”

Here, the coolest companies are those whose managers support the latest technology. They don’t necessarily have to be producing the technology to be considered cool, but they must be using the latest technology in the workplace. Lifelong learning also is essential, and progressive ideas, outside-of-the-box thinking and creativity must be allowed to flourish. While these attributes are exaggerated in the valley, they tend to be true of cool companies all up and down the California coast.

In the Midwest, cool employers are financially stable and are experiencing rapid growth. The coolest companies are those that offer solid advancement opportunities as well as more flexible work options, flexible schedules, casual dress and telecommuting. “In the Midwest, cool companies aren’t quite as wacko as they are in Silicon Valley, but they do keep employees informed and involved,” Taylor explains. Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc., based in Des Moines, Iowa, which markets and sells seed corn around the world, is considered to be one of the coolest of the region’s cool. Why? It fosters teamwork, creativity, innovation and extensive employee communication.

On the East Coast, particularly in the Northeast, the coolest companies tend to be those that are involved in exciting industries such as advertising, entertainment and high tech. Why? Maybe because it’s easier to push the envelope in creative companies. The Rockwell Group, a New York City-based design firm that specializes in entertainment architecture (clients include Disney, Sony and Planet Hollywood) is considered one of the best. Here, employees are even allowed to bring their pet dogs to work.

Workforce, April 1998, Vol. 77, No. 4, p. 54.

Posted on April 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Running the Numbers A Snaphot of 401(k)s

Here are some facts about 401(k)s:


  • The average number of investment options has risen from 4.0 in 1991 to 8.2 in 1997.

  • The most popular type of investment option is now equity growth funds, which 82 percent of all plan sponsors provide. That’s followed by balanced (78 percent), international equity (67 percent) and bond (67 percent). The least popular choice is company stock (23 percent).

  • In 1990, 47 percent of all 401(k) assets were placed in guaranteed investment contracts (GIC). In 1997, the figure had dropped to 18 percent. During the same period, investments in equities grew from 11 percent to 44 percent.

  • Most companies now provide at least a partial match for 401(k)s. Although only 1 percent of all companies provide more than a 100 percent match, 22 percent provide a 100 percent match; 8 percent offer a match of 51 percent to 99 percent; 52 percent feature a 50 percent match; 5 percent provide a 26 percent to 49 percent match; and 12 percent offer less than a 25 percent match.

  • Employee communication is seen as a far less expensive way to build participation than increasing the matching contribution. Sixty-two percent of respondents say communication has resulted in higher participation; 67 percent say it has helped increase contributions; and 74 percent believe it has influenced employee investment allocations.
  • Sixty percent of companies net the cost of investment management from investment returns; 34 percent absorb the cost; and 6 percent deduct it from employee accounts. The employer pays record-keeping expenses in 68 percent of plans; 23 percent deduct the cost from investment returns; and 9 percent take it from workers’ accounts.
  • Fifty-one percent of 401(k) (kiosk) providers also offer a defined benefit pension plan covering all or most employees.

SOURCE: William M. Mercer, “Survey on Employee Savings Plans 1997”

Workforce, April 1998, Vol. 77, No. 4, p. 72.

Posted on April 1, 1998July 10, 2018

HR Software Questions You Should Ask Before Buying

A

SSESSMENT OF NEEDS:


HR professionals and software vendors alike agree that the first step in researching HR software is understanding your current processes, foreseeing your future needs and knowing what goals you would like to achieve with the software. Use the questions below to help with this process.


Bob Conlin
Director of Marketing, Cort Directions, Inc., Bend, Oregon


“The first question an HR professional should ask a software vendor is, ‘Do you understand our specific requirements and what it is we’re trying to accomplish with new software?’ You need to make sure the vendor is addressing specific needs, not showing you a laundry list of features and functions in which you may or may not have an interest.”


Paul J. Farr, Sr.
Director of Human Resources, Community Health and Counseling Services, Bangor, Maine


“Does the software meet the detailed performance specifications that HR has already developed through the input of all who will use the product?”


Althea D. Heyneman
Customer Relations, Technical Difference, (the creators of People-Trak ), Bonsall, California


“Can this software affordably meet all my HR needs? Some software limits the number of employees who can be entered, so HR needs to plan for growth.”


John L. Miller
Director of Marketing & Sales, Presenting Solutions, Oakland, California


“Will this software make or save us money?”


Bob Hampel
Human Resources Manager, Bexar County Government, San Antonio, Texas


“How well have you identified what your needs and wants are, and how well do you understand the current business processes? If you know the answers, then it would be just a matter of asking specific questions of the vendor.”


Carrie Ferrer
Director of Human Resources, Sage U.S., Inc. (Sage U. S. Inc. is part of The Sage Group plc., a PC accounting software publisher), Dallas, Texas


“HR has an important role within a company to be a leader in maximizing revenue and decreasing expenses. Ask, ‘How can this software help our company achieve these goals by helping us become more productive?’”


John Enyedy
President, !Trak-It Solutions, Citrus Heights, California


“Software is designed for a target-sized company with a particular set of features—one size does not fit all. So determining the target-sized company and the client’s needs is important in determining if a software product is right for your company.”


COMPATIBILITY:


There’s not much worse than investing time and money into new software, only to find out it doesn’t work with other programs you al-ready have in place. Following are questions software vendors and HR professionals suggest you ask regarding software compatibility.


Fred Giles
Vice President, Pinkerton Services, Charlotte, North Carolina


“Will the software work with my current hardware, network and data? This requires not only compatibility, but also the ability to be integrated into the organization’s mix of related programs.”


Wendy Wilson
Learning Facilator, Office of State Revenue (NSW Treasury), Parramatta, New South Wales


“What types of platforms can it be run on? Is it Windows 95 compatible?”


Carrie Ferrer
Director of Human Resources, Sage U.S., Inc. (Sage U. S. Inc. is part of The Sage Group plc., a PC accounting software publisher), Dallas, Texas


“Is our existing technology compatible or would we be required to upgrade our internal systems?”


Wendy C. Tiller
Human Resources Consultant and President, Employee Development Strategies Inc., Plantation, Florida


“Is the software platform/architecture compatable with your organization’s IS system?”


Bob Conlin
Director of Marketing, Cort Directions, Inc.,


Bend, Oregon


“How will the software interface with other business systems? Human resources is not a stand-alone function—it should interface on an enterprise level with other systems, like payroll, time and attendance, point of sale, and so on. HR should think big picture when evaluating new software.”


CUSTOMIZATION/UPGRADING:


Because no two HR departments are created equal, the consensus is that HR software must be customizable. Also, despite the best attempts at foreseeing future needs, HR requires software that can be upgraded as goals change. Here are questions to assess for these traits.


Jim Spoor
Founder and President, SPECTRUM Human Resource Systems Corporation, Denver, Colorado


“Explain to me what’s involved in adapting your software to fit my current business rules and methodologies. How easy is it to further modify the software as my business rules change?”


Ian Kessler
Manager of Human Resources and Staff Development, Investment Company Institute, Washington, D.C.


“How often do upgrades come out for the product? This may lead to trouble for customization that has been done.”


Gretchen Artig-Swomley
President, SoftLink, Inc., Maplewood, Minnesota


“Ask about the number of functional options offered by the software package. This is an important first step in deciding if it’s right for your company’s needs. Can the software do what you need it to do? How well? Will more functions be added in the future? These are all appropriate questions.”


Wendy Wilson
Learning Facilator, Office of State Revenue (NSW Treasury), Parramatta, New South Wales


“Can the system be customized to meet the organizational needs? Can we build and add new screens and fields? Are upgrades included in the annual maintenance contract?”


Carrie Ferrer
Director of Human Resources, Sage U.S., Inc. (Sage U. S. Inc. is part of The Sage Group plc., a PC accounting software publisher), Dallas, Texas


“We need to ask how HR can customize or integrate this software into existing programs (like payroll or HRIS) to further enhance our ability to positively impact the bottom line.”


Paul J. Farr, Sr.
Director of Human Resources, Community Health and Counseling Services, Bangor, Maine


“How easy is it to update the software when new releases are issued and can the source code be added to for customization at later dates?”


Joseph A. Orban, Ph.D.
Senior Director of Product Technology, Workforce Development Group of NCS, Rosemont, Illinois


“Is the software released and what’s the version number? This will help avoid vapor ware, a slang term for the promoting/advertising of software before it’s available for use. Also, how long has it been on the market in its current release?”


REFERENCES:


Software vendors and HR purchasers of software both agree that the company from which you purchase is as important as the product. Here are the questions they recommend you ask your vendors and their clients.


Scott Scherr
Founder, President and CEO, The Ultimate Software Group Inc. (US Group), Fort Lauderdale, Florida


“Ask who the people are behind the product. Who developed it, and who implements and supports it? Developing and maintaining reliable HRMS/payroll software requires highly specialized expertise and the ability to re-main abreast of frequently changing regulatory requirements. When the software vendor focuses on developing only HRMS/payroll functionality rather than on a broad spectrum of products, you have a much greater probability of accuracy, timeliness and depth in the software.”


John L. Miller
Director of Marketing & Sales, Presenting Solutions, Oakland, California


“Who else is using this software effectively, and what have been their results?”


Ian Kessler
Manager, Human Resources and Staff Development, Investment Company Institute, Washington, D.C.


“What’s the average size of customers? How many companies have stopped using the product in the current year?”


Mike Kovatsh
Human Resources Consultant, Kitchener, Ontario


“Who else is using the product? Get references. Check out their platforms. Go for site visits! Ask lots of questions!”


Gretchen Artig-Swomley
President, SoftLink, Inc., Maplewood, Minnesota


“It’s smart to ask other clients which aspects of the software they’ve found most helpful. Their experiences can help you learn more about the software and its features.”


Bob Conlin
Director of Marketing, Cort Directions, Inc., Bend, Oregon


“Can you show me your software performing the tasks we’ve described as essential? If you see the software doing the things you identify as essential, you’ll feel more comfortable purchasing and implementing the system. Buying software that you hope will work can leave you frustrated with both your vendor and your software decision.”


TRAINING/SERVICE/SUPPORT:


Software is useless if you don’t know how to use it—or fix it. Vendors and HR professionals suggest you ask the following questions to assess a vendor’s service and support abilities before purchasing the product.


Deborah I. Gosa
Administrative Secretary, Human Resources, Blackhawk Technical College, Janesville, Wisconson


“What’s the learning curve estimated to be, and what manuals are available for reference?”


Fred Giles
Vice President, Pinkerton Services, Charlotte, North Carolina


“How much will my staff have to use this software to become competent, and will special training be required? Also, evaluate their user-support capabilities to determine if your people will have access to live tech-support personnel, or be limited to e-mail support or even program documentation.”


Joseph A. Orban, Ph.D.
Senior Director of Product Technology, Workforce Development Group of NCS, Rosemont, Illinois


“Are there any resources available to help solve problems, such as technical support, help files, manuals and at-home service? Is the support free or is there an extra charge? For how long after the purchase does the support remain available?”


Wendy Wilson
Learning Facilator, Office of State Revenue (NSW Treasury), Parramatta, New South Wales


“What type of service and support are provided by the software supplier?”


Scott Scherr
Founder, President and CEO, The Ultimate Software Group Inc. (US Group), Fort Lauderdale, Florida


“Ask what the company’s turnover rate is. When turnover is low, you’ll find knowledgeable, consistent help when you need it. Ask to visit the vendor’s headquarters. See for yourself who will be supporting you.”


Wendy C. Tiller
Human Resources Consultant and President, Employee Development Strategies Inc., Plantation, Florida


“Does the vendor provide on-going technical support? If so, what is the annual maintenance fee and what’s included? If not, is there a third party that provides technical support? What’s the fee?”


John Enyedy
President, !Trak-It Solutions, Citrus Heights, California


“What do I do when I need help? The answer, in most cases, is to call tech support. The things to be aware of are: Is there a special pre-sales number that gets you faster response before you buy? Be sure to try out the normal number a few times to see how fast you get through and how helpful and courteous the Help Desk is. Remember, everyone has a bad-hair day, so don’t make a judgment until you call a few times at different times during the day.”


Gretchen Artig-Swomley
President, SoftLink, Inc., Maplewood, Minnesota


“Before you commit to a package, find out the extent of services the vendor offers to its clients. If they can’t be there when you need help running a report, you might need to find a third-party vendor who can.”


Paul J. Farr, Sr.
Director of Human Resources, Community Health and Counseling Services, Bangor, Maine


“What’s the remedy if we find that the vendor-supplied training is inadequate and not as agreed upon?”


HIDDEN COSTS:


Last but definitely not least, our vendors and HR professionals urge you to decipher all costs before committing to any software purchase. Ask these questions.


Mike Kovatsh
Human Resources Consultant, Kitchener, Ontario


“What are all the costs (up-front purchase/ lease costs, ongoing maintenance costs, and hidden costs of hardware/software upgrades, including staff to perform the upgrade)?”


John Enyedy
President, !Trak-It Solutions, Citrus Heights, California


“How much is it really going to cost me for installation and training to actually get up and running? Less expensive systems often are easy to install and use, and you can do it yourself, whereas some of the more expensive systems can require three to five times the license fee to actually get up and running. Be sure to check this out and include it in your budget.


“How computer/software literate are you and your staff? The more you can do for yourself, the less it will cost.”


Althea D. Heyneman
Customer Relations, Technical Difference, (the creators of People-Trak ), Bonsall, California


“What’s the cost of technical support and software updates?”


Jim Spoor
Founder and President, SPECTRUM Human Resource Systems Corporation, Denver, Colorado


“Ask the vendor to outline the total cost of ownership of your software for the first two years, including all costs for hardware and software acquisition, implementation, conversion, customization, maintenance, training, HR staffing and IT/IS support requirements.”

Workforce, April 1998, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 79-80.

Posted on April 1, 1998July 10, 2018

HR Plays a Central Role in Ethics Programs

We recently received a call from a friend and associate who has enjoyed a long career in human resources. Formerly a human resources manager in a division of a large national company, she just accepted a challenging position as vice president of human resources at a smaller but rapidly growing firm.


“The CEO hired me because he knew I could professionalize the department and the company,” she said, “and one of the first things I noticed was the absence of any type of ethics or compliance initiative. It’s up to me to put one in place. Where do I start?”


Before giving her our specific advice on how to start, we assured her this was an appropriate role for her position. Increasingly we’ve found that human resources managers are taking the lead in recognizing the need for such programs and in making them happen. The reason may be that, like our friend, those in leadership positions in human resources are highly respected within their organizations for integrity, have the ability to solve complex ethical dilemmas, understand the company’s culture and communicate well at all levels. These traits are good ingredients for leading a successful corporate ethics initiative.


“HR as the ethics office” isn’t an oxymoron. Indeed, a recent national survey of ethics officers by the 500-member Belmont, Massachusetts-based Ethics Officer Association revealed that the most frequently reported internal working interaction was with the human resources function, equaled only by the legal office. Furthermore, human resources managers were cited as more supportive than either the security or finance functions.


This message—that human resources managers were cited as supportive—bears repeating. Recently, we have seen a shift in employee sentiment that does not perceive human resources as being trustworthy or sympathetic to ethical issues. Perhaps this is because the human resources office—operating as a strategic business partner—is viewed as bottom-line oriented only and a tool of corporate management. It might also be a result of human resources still being perceived as having no clout and unable to influence corporate policy regarding core ethical issues. Or there’s the perception that the very compensation systems designed by human resources are the root cause of many corporate scandals and employee wrongdoing.


But reality is debunking this myth. In large companies that support a separate ethics/compliance function that reports directly to a senior vice president or the CEO, the ethics officer today is likely to boast an HR background. This group of professionals—which includes Jerry Guthrie, corporate ethics director for BellSouth; Liz Gusich, ethics program director at USAA; and Gretchen Winter, vice president of business practices at Baxter International—is proving that HR people are well-equipped to deal with the myriad issues that arise. Furthermore, they claim the vast majority of calls coming into an ethics “helpline” are personnel-related. Thus, even in smaller companies that don’t have the resources for a separate ethics function, ethics initiatives properly fit as part of the human resources department.


Decide if HR is the place for your ethics program. For these reasons, we advised our friend to seize the moment and be proactive in playing a major role in developing an ethics culture in her firm. We suggested she ask herself seven basic questions, which are adapted from recommendations by former NYNEX Ethics Officer Graydon Wood, to see if she would be an effective corporate ethics/compliance officer:


  1. Do I hold an influential enough position in the company?
  2. Do I have or can I get unrestricted access to the CEO and the board?
  3. Do I have a high degree of trust and respect with my senior management team and with employees?
  4. Can I assemble the resources for effecting internal procedural change and carrying out investigations?
  5. Do I have or can I get access to information and support mechanisms that will provide monitoring, measuring, early warning and detection?
  6. Can I be assured of being rewarded for proactively carrying out the ethics/compliance role?
  7. Do I have the skills to operate effectively with the press, public forums and the legal process?

Once she affirmatively answered these questions, we helped her establish three objectives for her company’s ethics program: 1) establish standards and procedures reasonably capable of reducing the likelihood of criminal conduct; 2) promulgate and enforce the standards throughout the company; and 3) continually re-evaluate the program’s effectiveness and timeliness.


Lead the design of an ethics program. Once our friend determined her objectives, we cautioned her that although there are many good programs available as a model for her company, the most effective ones we have seen start with a blank-slate examination of the present operational culture. This includes a risk assessment of both the company itself and the business climate in which it operates. Industry practices and problems, the history of the company, geographic considerations and regulatory issues are all factors she will want to consider as she designs an ethics/ compliance program.


Finally, we suggested she begin by forging partnerships within the company to enlist support, share information and resources and drive the responsibility for an ethical culture to all parts of the organization. Whether the ethics function resides in HR or elsewhere within the company, the most effective ones are led by a committee of senior managers, including human resources, serving as a “kitchen cabinet” and a sounding board for the ethics/compliance officer. We believe this committee approach to instilling an ethical culture throughout the organization is essential if all facets of the business operation are to claim ownership of the values and standards articulated in the program.


Successful programs increase employee morale and foster a corporate culture that values honesty and integrity. Says Nicholas G. Moore, chairman and CEO of New York City-based Coopers & Lybrand LLP, “We have 70,000 people worldwide. A values program is the ‘glue’ that holds widespread organizations together.”

Workforce, April 1998, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 121-123.

Posted on April 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Be Cool! Cultivating a Cool Culture Gives HR a Staffing Boost

Picture the 1950s organization man: the man in the gray flannel suit. Picture the slightly graying, neatly trimmed sideburns. Picture a slim leather briefcase, metal filing cabinets, rotary phones and time clocks. Picture order, predictability and sameness. Picture Ward Cleaver.

Fast forward to 1998. Imagine an employee wearing a baseball cap and running shoes — at work. Picture office furniture on rolling wheels and meetings that take place on the Internet. Picture computers, chaos and Koosh(R) balls. Picture smiles.

Other than feeling like you’re comparing black and white to color, what’s the difference between these two companies — the corporate hierarchy of yesteryear and the colorful chaos of today? In a word, today’s companies, the most successful ones anyway, are cool, otherwise known as “ku,” “clutch” and “tasty” (for the younger set) or “with it,” “far out” and “groovy” (for you older folks).

Yes, cool. To succeed at the end of the millennium, it’s not enough for companies to be profitable, pay well and offer competitive benefits. As important as these factors are, if companies really want to attract, retain and motivate the best employees, they must also be cool places to work. In short, cool is to human resources what hip is to fashion: It’s what sets you apart.

Now if you’ve been in the corporate world for any length of time, you may argue that cool is only possible in certain industries — high tech and entertainment, for example. Or you may think cool is the province of certain regions, say Seattle or California’s Silicon Valley. You may even dismiss the idea of cool as something that’s only attainable in small, entrepreneurial companies. Sorry. With all due respect, you’d be dead wrong on all three accounts.

Any company in any industry in any location can and should strive for coolness. Why? Because it’s great for the bottom line. Best of all, your company may already be cooler than you think. Even if it’s not, there’s a lot human resources professionals can do to cultivate coolness.

What’s cool?
Before we talk about what it is exactly that makes a company cool — and how it benefits HR — let’s talk about what the word itself means and why, once again, it has become part of our national lexicon.

Alan Liu, an English professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, has been studying the culture of cool for some time. (Yes, believe it or not, there are people who research this sort of thing.) As he explains it, the word cool as a slang term originated with the jazz scene in the 1920s. In speakeasies and smoke-filled rooms, jazz and blues musicians would relax after a hot set by opening the back door and letting in the cool night air. The word cool soon grew from a way to describe the breeze coming in the door to a term that described the whole jazz scene to a term that described anything that, like jazz, was rebellious, nontraditional, cutting-edge and outside of the mainstream. And in a sense, that’s what the word still means today.

Cool as a slang term has been reborn several times over the years. Jack Kerouac and the beat generation of the ’50s used it to describe their own particular brand of beret-wearing, filterless-cigarette-smoking counterculture. In the 1960s, cool referred to anything anybody in a suit or over 30 wouldn’t understand. And while cool disappeared from use during the polyester days and disco nights of the ’70s, and the preppy, get-ahead Reagan years of the ’80s, today, in 1998, it’s back with a vengeance.

Credit the Internet for flashing the word back into our vocabulary. Every other Web page has a reference to something that’s considered cool. This time around, however, cool doesn’t refer to a particular subculture or style, but to anything, anywhere, that’s new, different, nontraditional, not the status quo, avant-garde, cutting edge, and most especially, forward-thinking. And cool even refers to what’s happening in Corporate America.

In the 1990s, we have casual dress, Halogen lights, onsite massage, lattes in the lunchroom, virtual teams and domestic-partner benefits. The triangular corporate hierarchy has collapsed. We want employees to speak their minds, not toe the line. Management is bottom up, not top down.

What has happened is that traditional ways of working have been tossed out the window, at least in progressive companies, and employees have responded. Fancy that. It turns out workers like such things as flexible schedules, onsite day care and the ability to express an opinion. Today, the corporations to work for are those in which managers and employees act least like you’d expect them to act. And this is cool.

Are you cool?
So how does a company become a cool place to work? What are the dimensions that turn your run-of-the-mill company from a money-making machine into a cool place of employment? For starters, the company must never, ever, do something because that’s the way it has always been done. That kind of attitude is the very antithesis of cool. As John Challenger, executive vice president of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a Chicago-based outplacement firm, explains, “Cool companies are revamping the traditional notions of business.”

But what does this mean, exactly? While cultivating cool is far more art than it is science, there are common denominators shared by cool companies. Any one of these dimensions, on its own, isn’t enough to brand a company as cool. To become the coolest of the “kew-el,” a company needs to possess nearly all of them. These dimensions are:

  1. Respect for work/life balance. Bruce Tulgan, founder of RainmakerThinking Inc., a New Haven, Connecticut-based consultancy that helps businesses understand Generation X, conducted more than 1,300 workplace interviews with employees age 35 and under. Searching his database of transcripts using the keyword “cool,” he discovered that the HR practices most employees find cool are those that support the notion that employees are individuals who have lives outside the office.

    “In cool companies, the old-fashioned distinctions between ‘home’ and ‘work’ aren’t there,” he explains. These companies recognize employees have pressures outside of the office — and that’s OK. Cool companies work to ease these pressures by providing such benefits as flexible work schedules, part-time jobs, job sharing, telecommuting, sabbaticals, onsite day care, dry cleaning and banking.

    Among the leaders in the work/life arena are Deloitte & Touche LLP, Eddie Bauer and the City of Phoenix, the 1998 winner of the Workforce Magazine Optimas Award in the Quality of Life category.

    But really cool companies don’t just help employees manage their lives outside work. They also enable employees to bring life into their work. How? By allowing them to express their individuality on the job through casual dress and personalized office decor, and by allowing them to play while at work.

    OddzOn Products, a toy manufacturer based in Campbell, California, has practically institutionalized the notion of having fun at work. Granted, it may be what you’d expect from a toy company, but how many companies do you know have closed the office and taken all 100 employees to a movie in the middle of a workday?

    Human resources managers at companies such as OddzOn understand that the majority of working adults spend the majority of their time at work. If these adults have any hope of getting cool into their lives, it’s not by dropping out altogether. That’s so impractical. It’s by working for companies that allow employees’ individual sense of cool to flourish. It’s by working for companies where they can be slightly nontraditional and nonconformist while at work. “Today, coolness isn’t outright rebellion,” Liu explains. “It’s rebellion from within. It’s the ability of a person to say, ‘I work here and I’m cool.'”

  2. A sense of purpose. According to Robert Levering, co-author with Milton Moskowitz of the Fortune 100 list, Best Companies to Work for in America, cool companies are those in which employees feel connected to the product, to the corporate mission or to the overall vision of the industry. “In these companies, employees are energized by the sense that they’re somehow making a contribution,” Levering explains.

    Referring to his list of the 100 Best, which he also considers to be the 100 Coolest, Levering believes cool companies are like Harley-Davidson Inc., the motorcycle manufacturer based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Here, employees are so excited about the product that many of them have tattooed the company’s name on their bodies.

    Cool companies also are companies like Interface, a carpet manufacturer based in Atlanta. In an industry known for its environmental unfriendliness, Interface is setting itself apart from the competition by working to become the cleanest carpet manufacturer around. CEO Ray Anderson is leading this charge, making environmentalists out of employees by convincing them, “We’re screwing up royally as a human race.”

    Merck & Co. Inc., the giant drug manufacturer based in Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, also has fostered a devoted workforce by working to always “put patients before profits.” Here, according to Levering, “employees take obvious pride in the fact that Merck provides a low-cost anti-AIDS drug and gives away medicine in developing countries that prevents [a disease known as] river blindness.”

  3. Diversity. An increasingly important dimension of coolness, according to people who observe Corporate America in action, is diversity. Not just politically correct diversity, as in affirmative action, but also real-life diversity. J. Walker Smith, managing partner with Yankelovich Partners in Atlanta, explains that cool companies are “a part of the world, rather than apart from the world.” They’re places where employees feel it’s safe to express their differences, whatever those differences may be, including gender, race, sexual orientation, work style, temperament and opinion.

    Allstate Insurance Co., based in Northbrook, Illinois, is one organization that takes its diversity missive seriously, and as a result, is considered pretty cool by some of the leading corporate list makers. The company has received extensive national recognition for its work to provide opportunities to women, Hispanics and disabled individuals. Among those bestowing the honors are: Working Mother Magazine, Hispanic Magazine, Business Week and the American Society for Training and Development.

    But when it comes to cool, diverse demographic numbers are only part of the story. Jerry Hirshberg, president of Nissan Design International Inc., in San Diego, California, believes his company is successful — and highly cool — for the very reason that diverse personalities aren’t only nurtured, but expected. His company, which lists the Nissan Sentra and Pathfinder among its many design credits, hires people especially for their unique cognitive sets and work styles. “Then, we work very hard to allow people to maintain those differences,” Hirshberg says. “This isn’t easy, but it’s more real and has a lot more built-in stimulation, the kind that’s necessary for creative work.

    “I think of two kinds of parties,” he adds. “An uncool party is one where people are invited for the sole reason of having a proper and impressive guest list. A cool party, on the other hand, is one where people are invited because they provide a stimulating and enjoyable mix, regardless of whether or not they have the right credentials.” Admit it: Which party would you rather attend?

  4. Integrity. Tired of all the lying, cheating and stealing they read about in the news, today’s employees also find the idea of integrity a real turn-on. They don’t want to be forced to check their value system at the front door of the office. As Tulgan discovered in interview after interview: Integrity is where it’s at.

    Integrity refers to the ability of a company to communicate the truth to employees — whatever that truth may be. But, Tulgan says, it’s also much, much more. Integrity also refers to a company’s ability to care about the quality of its products and services. Companies with integrity want employees to do a great job, not just get the job done. Companies with integrity also allow employees to stand up for what they believe in.

    J.P. Morgan & Co. Inc., the Wall Street banking firm that ranked 44th on Levering’s Best Companies list, earned that honor, in part, because of its high ethical standards. If integrity is possible on Wall Street, this kind of cool can certainly be achieved elsewhere.

  5. Participatory management. Lynn Taylor, vice president and director of research at Robert Half International Inc., the Menlo Park, California-based specialized staffing firm, decided to do her own research into what makes a company a cool place to work. Putting a call out to her regional directors, Taylor asked them which of the firm’s clients were considered the coolest places to work — and why. Their coolness had to be demonstrated by the fact that temporary workers were just dying to work there. (This is important because a majority of temps use these assignments as a way to shop for traditional jobs.)

    Taylor discovered one of the primary characteristics of today’s coolest companies was a participative management style. “These are companies that have realized employees on the front lines often have the best ideas, and that it’s often counterproductive to tell them what to do.” You see, in companies with a participative management style, collaboration may be the norm, but it’s still also possible for individual employees to have an impact. Who was on Taylor’s list? Nantucket Nectars, a juice company based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Here, the style of management is so participatory that there’s no established hierarchy and no secretaries.

  6. Learning environment. Another thing Taylor discovered when she set out to separate the cool from the merely tepid, is that cool companies promote lifelong learning. “These are companies in which employees leave at the end of the day knowing more than they did when they started,” she says.

    Anybody who has recruited on college campuses lately knows that the ability to continue learning is foremost in the minds of today’s young workers. “New graduates want to know your training budget,” Tulgan says. And why wouldn’t they? You’ve told employees they have to be responsible for their own career growth and development, and guess what: They believed you. Now, it’s up to human resources to keep up its end of the bargain by providing opportunities for that growth.

    Companies that do this, including Motorola, a training powerhouse based in Schaumberg, Illinois, and Trident Precision Manufacturing Inc., in Webster, New York, are considered very cool places for the knowledge thirsty.

Why cool matters.
If you can take all this — the telecommuting, tattoos and diversity, and blend them with ethics, empowerment and education — then yours would truly be a killer company to work for. But what’s the benefit? Why should HR care?

Because being cool — I mean, really, really, cool — makes it much easier to attract, retain and motivate the best employees around.

Let’s start with recruitment. For years, the Kwasha Lipton Group/hra of Coopers & Lybrand LLP, in New York City, ran your basic line-up of traditional recruitment advertisements. You know, the ones that promote competitive benefits, a good salary, growth opportunities, yada-yada-yada. For each newspaper ad, they’d receive approximately 100 responses from which they’d identify one good candidate — maybe.

Realizing the ads weren’t working, the company’s HR people began to look at what they really had to offer employees: a unique and challenging environment in which the expectation was for individuals to perform, not conform; an environment in which individuality was allowed to flourish.

HR revamped its ads to more accurately reflect the workplace. One headline reads: “Sell your expertise. Not your soul,”. As a result, Kwasha Lipton started receiving approximately 350 responses per ad, from which the HR staff hired an average of five to seven top-notch employees. According to Rosemarie Bruno, director of human resources in the company’s New York metro region, “The ads work not only because they’re a more accurate portrayal of what it’s like to work here, but because people want to work in this kind of environment.”

Netscape, the Mountain View, California-based maker of Internet software, also has been able to capitalize on its cool image to attract some pretty cool employees. In fact, Margie Mader, whose responsibilities include worldwide staffing and recruiting, isn’t called the staffing director. Her title is Director of Bringing in the Cool People. Why? “Because with all the competition in hiring right now, you need to give yourself an edge. You need something that describes the working environment and that’s intriguing to the candidate pool. Cool is appealing,” says Mader.

Another advantage to becoming and then marketing yourself as a cool company is that you’ll be attractive to employees who want to work at cool companies — and that’s a good thing. According to Mader, employees who are attracted to cool companies are less motivated by the money than the work. They’re interested in the level of work they’re doing and in their own personal career development. They’re people who are taking cool out of the arena of “neat clothes and nice car” and using it to refer to a contribution of intellect. In short, she says, “cool appeals to bright people who are asking questions that force companies to think differently.”

Bruno agrees. “The candidates who responded to our new recruitment ads were different from other candidates, especially in terms of their creativity. These people want to use their creativity at work. They think it’s cool to be able to work in a corporate setting and still be able to use all of their intellect, experience and expertise.”

But, you’re wondering, can you keep them around? Are cool employees the type to stay put? How does all this affect retention and the bottom line? Let’s take a look at the numbers. Using the Levering and Moskowitz research on the 100 Best Companies as a benchmark, today’s coolest companies possess a turnover rate considerably lower than the national average: 6.9 percent versus between 11 percent and 12 percent. Not only that, but if you average the top 100 companies together, the typical best or cool company increased its workforce by 23 percent in the last two years and receives more than 63,000 applications per year. In short, people want to work for cool companies; when they get there they stay; and they help companies grow. What more can HR ask for?

So, for all the Ward Cleavers of the world who think cool is only for young Californians who wear very small eyeglasses, very large pants and work on computers, think again. Cool is not about youth; it’s not about location; it’s not about fashion; and it’s not about technology. It’s a way of thinking — and a profitable one at that.

Workforce, April 1998, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 50-61.

Posted on March 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Employee Values Are Changing Course

You’re offered a great promotion, but you would have to relocate to a distant city. Your family says the decision is yours, but you know they don’t want to go. What do you do?


You’ve got a golf game scheduled for Sunday afternoon, and you’ve worked all weekend to write a proposal to be presented Monday morning. The proposal is more or less finished, but a few more hours of work would make it polished and persuasive. Do you cancel the game?


You like your job and feel that you’re making a significant contribution to your organization, but you’ve been offered an early-retirement package. You don’t want to retire, but it’s unlikely that you’ll ever be offered such attractive terms again. What do you decide?


These are tough decisions, because they force you to choose between two things you value. How each of you would decide depends on which value has the higher priority—family happiness or advancement, personal balance or competitiveness, and power or security. Ethical dilemmas can pose the same problem such as the loyalty-to-employer vs. loyalty-to-family issue described in the January 1998 “Ethical Stand.”


Just as they do for you, employees’ values operate quietly in the background of all the decisions they make, coming to the foreground when choices involve conflicting values. Many of the disquieting and disruptive trends in the workplace today are the result of conflicts between the new social values of employees and the more traditional values held by employers.


Today’s workforce has a new set of social values.
That social values do change is obvious everywhere. The manager who would unquestioningly move for a promotion five or 10 years ago, today is just as likely to put family happiness and stability ahead of career advancement. The baby boomer who never gave any thought to retirement may conclude that financial security beats taking any chances.


As employees increasingly make choices about work that fly in the face of the expectations and needs of employers, it’s helpful to look at the broad changes in social values that are behind those decisions. DYG Inc., a Danbury, Connecticut-based social and marketing research company whose chairman is Daniel Yankelovich, has been tracking Americans’ hopes, dreams, fears, and ideas of right and wrong for years. The firm’s ongoing research documents a social upheaval that has impact on all aspects of life and profound implications for the world of work.


At conferences sponsored by employee-development firm Blessing/White, DYG’s President Madelyn Hochstein identifies five social trends which are emerging today and influencing decisions about work/life:


1. Anti-institutional bias. The federal government has been the major focus of skepticism and distrust, but the sense that established structures are out of control extends to business. A decade of downsizing has taken a heavy toll. Highly publicized executive compensation packages have stirred up widespread outrage. Large corporations are no longer regarded as benevolent.


2. Self-reliance. Feeling betrayed or abandoned by the corporations they once looked to for security, guidance and the means to the good life, Americans increasingly value and depend on their personal resources. Entrepreneurs are the new heroes, and having one’s own business is the new status symbol.


3. Less willingness to take risks. Baby boomers who came of age in the go-go ’60s have spent most of their working lives with the expectation that the good times would go on forever. The recent years of no growth, cost cutting and downsizing have caused many of them to trim their sails and begin behaving in self-protective ways. The most risk-averse group of all is Generation X. The majority of this group believes it’s safer to work for oneself than to join a company.


4. Meritocracy. One way that Americans deal with the widening gap between the “haves” and the “have-nots” is to view the world in terms of winners and losers. In contrast to the decades when most Americans saw themselves as members of the huge middle class, they now believe there isn’t enough for everybody and the rewards will go to “the best.” The mood is intolerant and punitive toward those who aren’t making it.


5. Family and child-centeredness. The divorce rate has dropped, people are marrying earlier, adultery is once again condemned and the baby boom of the ’90s is outstripping the one that began in 1946. Americans believe the institution of the family has been in crisis long enough, and they lay some of the blame on the business environment. Gen-X parents don’t want their kids to grow up as latchkey children. The ideal, once again, is to have one parent at home.


What these trends point to, Hochstein says, is a new moral focus. For decades, people believed that the business of America was business. The most important indicator of happiness and security was the economic indicator. Within this values framework, it made sense to work hard, to be loyal to your company, to relocate your family to keep your foothold on the corporate ladder, to conform and to trust that hard work and loyalty would pay off in financial growth and lifelong security. Then as manufacturing jobs moved abroad, as global competition forced cost-cutting measures, as plants closed and managerial positions were eliminated, people realized that employers were no longer keeping their end of the bargain.


The DYG research shows that Americans have learned to live with a more sober economic outlook. Workers have passed through a pragmatic response to economic limits —taking a second job, shopping at outlet stores, remodeling the house instead of buying a larger one—and adopted a moral focus. They’ve moved from an emphasis on what works to a concern with what’s right.


Traditional organizations are lagging far behind.
Many companies haven’t received the message that overworkers and detached clockwatchers alike are there just for the paycheck. The disconnect between corporations and employees shows up in recruiting and retention challenges, performance problems, negative attitudes toward change initiatives and in unethical actions such as sabotage, theft and vandalism.


As Hochstein points out, because values precede behavior, it’s safe to predict the difficulties will increase. Already, the largest private employer in America is a provider of temporary staffing. Temporary work, part-time work and contract work are all on the rise. Sideline businesses, usually home-based, are cropping up everywhere. And ethical challenges are on the rise, as described in detail in the October 1997 Workforce cover story, “50 Percent of Your Employees Are Lying, Cheating & Stealing.”


Reconciling corporate and employee values will help to cement the ethical environment you’re working to build


Companies need to take employees’ values seriously.
The choices people are making point to a desire for more meaning in work and in life. To attract the best employees and retain their creativity, productivity, loyalty and ethical behavior, your organizations will have to make room for their personal values. Enlightened companies, realizing that energized, committed employees give them their only competitive edge, are taking values seriously.


Reconciling corporate and employee values will help to cement the ethical environment you’re working to build and maintain. As Frank Navran, writer of the September 1997 installment of “Ethical Stand” explains: A corporate values statement is one of the key components of a best-practices ethics program.


People at all levels want to know what the organization stands for, and whether it’s something they can feel a part of. Identifying and articulating the fundamental guiding principles of the business is the first step to winning back the commitment of employees who have come to believe that what matters to the company isn’t what matters to them. Knowing that their company stands for values they themselves hold can help employees decide to devote their loyalty and best effort.


It’s equally critical to help individual employees clarify their own values. When people understand their own priorities, they become more decisive, confident and responsible. And unless they’re clear about their personal values, they’ll have no way of judging whether the corporate values agree with their own.


The message organizations have been sending for too long is that they don’t value their employees. There’s no better way to prove that they do than to acknowledge and respond to the values of those employees.


Workforce, March 1998, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 83-84.

Posted on March 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Having a Heart During Business Change

Jacqueline Miller, author of “Heart at Work” and a San Francisco-based consultant, helped lead Edison’s “Creating Our Future” workshops. Miller, who has been through many corporate acquisitions, mergers and divestitures as a senior HR executive, offers her insight about how to explain the opportunities that such change offers people.


Miller says that large-scale corporate change can offer employees these three opportunities:


1. They may have an even better opportunity with a new owner than they currently have.


2. They can find a new job with another company and look forward to the typical pay raise of 8 percent to 10 percent that most people get when they change jobs.


3. They will receive a severance package if they are let go.


Miller says it’s best to deal with employees in a straightforward and direct, but heartfelt, way. Companies have the obligation to deal with people as feeling, caring entities who need emotional support during the journey, not just paychecks.


Workforce, March 1998, Vol. 77, No. 3, p. 86.


Posted on March 1, 1998July 10, 2018

Teach Generation Xers to Micromanage Themselves

Generation Xers, those employees born roughly between 1965 and 1981, are often challenged by carrying out tasks independently. This positive attribute is what makes this generation the most entrepreneurial generation in history, according to Bruce Tulgan, founder of New Haven, Connecticut-based Rainmaker Inc., a think tank that researches the working lives of Generation Xers. So how should a manager calibrate the delegation of responsibility to a relatively young member of the corporate team? Here are six useful tips:


1) Stick to the principle that all work should be divided into clearly delineated tangible results, with each result assigned to an owner, and each owner assigned 100 percent responsibility.


2) With new employees who haven’t yet earned much responsibility, assign 100 percent ownership for tangible results that are smaller in scope. Let them use these smaller results as proving ground to earn ownership of larger results.


3) Attach a concrete deadline to every tangible result, regardless of scope.


4) Spell out any parameters, guidelines or specifications at the time results and deadlines are assigned.


5) With larger results, require result owners to make and submit a plan of action, including intermediate goals and deadlines, as well as the concrete actions necessary to achieve each intermediate goal.


6) Encourage result owners to monitor change and be prepared to adjust goals and fine-tune their plans.


Workforce, March 1998, Vol. 77, No. 3, p. 23.


Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 539 Page 540 Page 541 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress