Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on July 30, 2004July 10, 2018

Outsider CEOs Aren’t Always Saviors

G lobally, insider CEOs leaving the company left a positive impact of three percentage points on shareholder returns in their wake. In contrast, when an outside-hire left the top slot, shareholder returns typically fell by half a percentage point as a result of his tenure.



The same trend holds true in North America, Europe and Japan.


Median Shareholder Returns of Insider vs. Outsider CEOs, by Region


  2003 Insiders 2003 Outsiders Over Six Years–Insiders Over Six Years–Outsiders
North America 2.7 percent 1.3 percent 1.4 percent -0.8 percent
Europe 1.6 -3.5 1.0 -3.5
Japan 4.9 -2.6 -1.4 0.7
Rest of World 1.4 14.1 2.2 13.2
Global 3.0 -0.5 0.7 -0.8

Source:CEO Succession 2003: The Perils of “Good” Governance by Chuck Lucier, Rob Schuyt and Junichi Handa; a Booz Allen Hamilton Group annual survey.

Posted on July 30, 2004June 29, 2023

Les Hayman’s Excellent Adventure

Sprawled lackadaisically, sans necktie, across the sofa in his luxury hotel suite in Manhattan, Les Hayman entertains his visitors with a tale of how the KGB accidentally developed a miraculous hangover cure. “They actually set out to create a pill to keep a Soviet agent sober while he got his source drunk as a loon to pry information out of him,” says the chief officer of global human resources for German-based software giant SAP. “Unfortunately, it turned out not to work. The KGB guys got just as drunk as whoever they were with. But they never got hangovers. Since the fall of communism, of course, you can buy the pills for a euro a box. Now, when we go to dinner in Bordeaux, instead of just taking a bottle of wine, we also take a supply of those pills. They’re absolutely brilliant.”



    The ruddy-cheeked 58-year-old with the still-lush tangle of silvery-brown hair tells the story with a rollicking Australia-New Zealand accent, punctuated with a droll chuckle. His genial barroom-philosopher manner gives scarcely a hint of his life struggles–from his days as a child refugee in post-World War II Europe to his adult battle with cancer and his string of careers. Hayman is a man who has led a succession of lives on multiple continents–from would-be doctor turned computer programmer in Australia in the 1960s to Silicon Valley executive in the 1980s to Asian business mogul in the early 1990s.


    Now, as a top executive for SAP, he is reshaping human resources at the world’s leading business-software company. It might seem a daunting task for someone who notes, almost gleefully, that he’s never before worked in human resources. SAP, which controls half the worldwide market for software that companies use to administer everything from customer relations to supply-chain management, is a sprawling enterprise that employs more than 30,000 people in 50 countries. But that hasn’t stopped Hayman from jettisoning scores of programs that he found irrelevant, totally overhauling the corporate training program and telling his 500-member staff that they should spend time in jobs outside their specialty so they can learn what sort of help other departments really need.


    Hayman is not satisfied with a supporting role, either. He is determined to make human resources a player in shaping strategy at SAP. To that end, he aims ambitiously to develop a uniform method by which Wall Street can calculate the precise worth of human capital, just as analysts and investors now evaluate revenues and depreciation. Though skeptics wonder if Hayman’s idea could ever work, they also acknowledge that it could revolutionize the valuation of companies–and elevate human resources departments to vastly greater influence everywhere.


Thinking big
    Hayman’s lofty ambitions don’t stop him from treating human resources with an almost exhilarating irreverence. “Human capital is like pesto,” he declares. “Five years ago, nobody had heard of the stuff, and there were maybe three restaurants in New York that had it. Today, you stop at a hot dog stand, and the man asks you if you want mustard, relish or pesto.” He pokes fun at other current buzzwords and popular “paradigms.”


    “A few years ago, it was talent, and how you recruit and retain it and so on,” he says. “Now, they’re all asking, how do you get people to be engaged? I wish I could say what’s driving this is that executives are getting smarter about people. But that’s not it, really. The truth is that everyone is nervous, now that the economy is improving and the job market is freeing up at last. It’s always your good people, the top performers, who leave. These executives know there’s this backlog of people ready to jump, and it scares them.”



ENDURING SUCCESS:
 “I remember a lot of great companies from the 1970s that have since disappeared because their focus was on products, not people.”



    As a 15-year cancer survivor, he’s got a no-nonsense perspective on engagement. “Life is too fleeting,” he says. “I’ve never been able to understand people who just muddle through the week, waiting for the weekend. You have to be able to get up and say, ‘I’m going to be working another day at SAP–that’s fabulous. I can’t wait to get there.’ If you don’t feel that, you’re wasting a big part of your life.”


    Hayman’s experiences as chief of SAP’s Asia Pacific operation in the 1990s left him feeling passionate about the importance of people management but dubious about the practices meant to foster human capital. “I found that human resources had wonderful theoretical understanding, but no sense of my pain points,” he says. “They’d want to put in an absolutely marvelous three-year program that was designed ultimately to not only solve all of my major business issues, but end world hunger in the process. The problem was that I didn’t have three years. I had one year. I had to make money.” Too few human resources people, he discovered, had ever actually worked in other parts of the business, something he now requires for advancement. “I tell them, ‘Go out and spend two years selling software, or working on a development team,’ ” he says. ” ‘Find out what it means to have to meet a quota. It’ll totally change your perspective.’ ”


    When Hayman took over SAP’s human resources department, he discovered to his shock that it had more than a thousand different programs in various stages of development. “We promptly culled them by two-thirds,” he says. “Everyone in human resources was under tremendous stress, but a lot of it was wasted. They were doing things that had no impact on the business.” Instead, Hayman surveyed the rest of the company and asked what they actually needed. “There were a lot of places where what we had built was really out of step. We had areas where the board had set a business strategy, but it wasn’t translated into compensation planning at the level of the field organization. If you don’t align the organization behind the strategy, it’s a hope rather than a strategy.”


    Hayman also revamped much of the curriculum at SAP University, the company’s internal training organization. “They were spending more time worrying about generic training courses, such as negotiation training and time management,” he says. “You can hire outside people to do that.” Instead, he and the institute’s director, Karen Tobiasen, devised new courses that focused on specific tasks that SAP managers handled in their jobs, such as giving performance reviews. Drawing from his own career experience as an autodidact–he taught himself computer programming, for example, by designing a computer game–Hayman also reduced the role of training in staff development. “You learn best by doing,” he says. “So we build 10 percent of development around training, and another 20 percent around coaching. The other 70 percent comes from on-the-job training.”


    He’s convinced that most companies go about development in the wrong way. “They basically treat people as if they’re buildings or equipment, that you can divest yourself of when they’re obsolete,” he says. “They rush people along too quickly, promoting them until they fail. And they do fail, because when you’ve got people on the fast track and they’re in a new job every 18 months, there’s no time to really measure them and evaluate their growth.” Instead, SAP employees stay in a job for at least three years, so they can be brought along gradually, like a boxer who takes on progressively tougher opponents.



NURTURING TALENT:
“You learn best by doing.
So we build 10 percent of development around training,
and another 20 percent around coaching. The other 70 percent comes from on-the-job training.”



    Ambitious career-climbers may chafe at such a non-meteoric pace, but there’s a positive trade-off. What might be a career-stunting flub at another company is simply part of the development process to Hayman, who nonchalantly notes that his up-and-coming talent will screw up one of every three tasks. “You have to give them an understanding of how to cope with failure,” he says. “You don’t just discard a boxer the first time he gets beat up. That’s how he learns to take a punch.”


    Hayman seems to relish giving up-and-comers an opportunity to make mistakes in SAP’s six-month global development program. Mid-career executives are given a strategic assignment that they must complete while still keeping up with their regular jobs. Hayman prefers to set deliberately vague goals, allocates scant resources to them and provides little guidance. “After all, that’s the way it works in reality,” he says. “Your first job is to narrow things down. You can’t solve world hunger. You’ve got to find something you can do and focus on it.” Additionally, he teams executives on several continents, so they’re forced to adjust to other business cultures.


    “The Germans will ring me up to complain about the Latin Americans and French because the Germans are very time driven,” he says with a chuckle. “But Asians and Latins think, ‘Friday gives me until Monday morning at 8. I’ll finish it over the weekend.’ And they do. But the Germans see that as lack of commitment. They’ll ring the guy before they leave the office and ask, ‘Have you finished your work package?’ Meanwhile, the Spanish and Italians ring me and say, ‘The Germans are so anal-retentive about time, it’s unbelievable.’ “


    Gradually, however, participants pick up on how to communicate and understand one another’s style. It’s a skill that Hayman himself is a master of, says Pranay Mital, director of SAP’s small and medium-sized business software operation in Singapore. The freewheeling New Zealander “had to work with Indians such as myself, who have a very conservative culture, and hierarchical cultures like the Japanese and Koreans, while also dealing with headquarters in Germany,” Mital says. “If someone can manage this region and communicate with everyone, he can do just about anything.”


    Hayman has moved among different cultures throughout his life. He is of Polish ancestry, but was born in the Soviet Union, grew up in Australia and travels on a New Zealand passport. (“He’s from either Australia or New Zealand, depending on whose rugby team is on TV,” says Martin Metcalf, SAP’s managing director for the United Kingdom, Ireland and Africa.) He’s lived in Singapore, northern California and Bordeaux, in southwest France, where he presently resides. He spends two-thirds of his time shuttling back and forth between an office in Paris and SAP headquarters in Waldorf, Germany, and the rest on the road–sometimes crossing the Atlantic several times a week. “A laptop, a BlackBerry and a phone, that’s all you need.”


    Such roaming is nothing new for him. He was born in the Ural Mountains in what was then the Soviet Union at the end of World War II, the son of a Polish cavalry officer who’d joined the Russian invaders to fight their common enemy, the Nazis. “He said it was time to flee Russia when he went to a meeting and a communist said that if all the world’s wealth was fairly divided, each person would get 1,000 rubles. My father had 2,000 rubles saved, so he knew he’d better go.”


    Hayman’s parents hiked across Europe carrying their infant son, using their old Polish documents to slip across borders. Eventually they emigrated to Australia, where young Leslie spent his youth doing gymnastics and dreaming of becoming a doctor. Those ambitions were dashed in medical school, when he worked nights in a hospital. “I realized that sick children broke my heart, and sick adults never stopped complaining,” he says.


    Fortunately, he took an elective computer-programming course and became fascinated with the school’s primitive 1960s-vintage computer, a room-sized Elliott 803. “I passed the course by writing a tic-tac-toe game for it,” he says. “Actually, it was one of the most creative things I’ve ever done.” He became a programmer for International Harvester and then in the 1970s jumped to Digital Equipment Corp., a major player in mainframes, where he tried his hand at sales. In the 1980s, he cofounded Calyx, a successful business software firm. At the same time, he and his wife Victoria were raising two adopted daughters, now grown.


    Then, in 1988, Hayman learned that he had colon cancer. “It was a total shock–I’d always been a gym junkie, a fitness freak. I’d already quit smoking. Nobody in my family had it.” The afternoon that he got the bad news, he went home to his wife, who covered him with a blanket as he lay on the couch watching TV. “After a while, I got up and said to her, ‘Let’s get dressed up and go out somewhere nice for dinner.’ She reminded me that I’d just been told that I had cancer. I said, ‘Look, there are two possibilities. If they got it early and I can be cured, that’s reason to celebrate. And if they haven’t gotten it early enough–well, I can’t afford to lie on this couch because I don’t have a lot of time left.’ ”


    After fighting for a year to regain his health, he decided to retire. “But then a guy from Sun Microsystems came around and convinced my wife that I would live longer if I worked instead of tending tomatoes in the garden,” he says. He worked in Palo Alto for five years before joining SAP in 1994. In eight years, he built SAP’s Asia Pacific business from a paltry $6 million in sales to an astonishing $800 million. Hayman credits his success to getting the most out of his staff’s talent. “If you talk to technology companies, you always hear them say that what they really need is a killer application,” Hayman says. “That’s rubbish. That’s really the by-product of what you do. You need a good strategy–not a brilliant one, but one you can execute. And you need a performance-driven culture and people who are emotionally engaged. If you have all those things, you’ll create the right product.”


    When Hayman, who was tapped for SAP’s board in 1999, decided to step down from the Asian post, he took the job heading human resources in the belief that he could have an even bigger impact. “I remember a lot of great companies from the 1970s that have since disappeared because their focus was on products, not people,” he says.


But his pragmatism tells him that human capital will be taken seriously only if it’s shown to relate directly to profits. While many are developing and utilizing metrics for measuring the effectiveness of human resources, Hayman wants to go a lot further. He aims to take the mountains of data generated by SAP’s software and crunch the numbers to calculate the impact of executive retention, the ratio of internal promotion rates to external hires, the workforce’s skills and other present intangibles on the bottom line. He’s funding a research and development effort by Boston Consulting and Accenture, a spinoff of Arthur Andersen, to see whether it’s feasible. His dream is an objective standard for human capital, similar to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP. “I want people to be able to compare company A and company B. The ultimate step would be that you’d integrate it into the balance sheet.”


    Some human-capital experts, such as David Larcker, an accounting professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, question whether such a valuation system would work. Hayman himself boldly predicts that within five years, companies will be reporting standardized measures of human capital.


    “Of course, in five years I’ll be retired, so nobody’s going to be checking back to see whether I was right or wrong,” he says. In the meantime, he’s forging ahead with a customary sense of urgency. “I tell the younger people at our company that I’m 58, but this time yesterday I was 28, and I’ll be 88 tomorrow if I’m lucky enough to be around. That’s how quickly it seems to go. So you’ve got to make the best use of every moment you have.”


Workforce Management, August 2004, pp. 41-44 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on July 29, 2004July 10, 2018

Drug Benefits Generating Fierce Debate in Milwaukee

A proposal to save about $120,000 by encouraging some city employees to use generic drugs instead of name-brand drugs is causing an intense debate in the city of Milwaukee.


According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, what’s causing so much consternation is that the benefits change would only apply to managerial employees. Many city employees are union members, and the union doesn’t want to change the current benefits outlined in its contract. Milwaukee Alderman Jim Bohl is arguing that the city could save a lot more money if union members also ponied up some more money for prescriptions. According to the Journal Sentinel, Bohl ripped into city benefits manager Mike Brady for not consulting enough with aldermen when crafting the proposal.


Right now, managers who are in the Milwaukee health plan have a $4 co-pay for each generic drug prescription and an $8 co-pay for name-brand drugs.


The new proposal would work on a percentage basis. Managers would pay 20 percent of the cost and the city would pay the other 80 percent, according to the Journal Sentinel. A $15 generic drug, for example, would cost a manager $3, and a $90 name-brand drug would require a $18 co-pay.

Posted on July 26, 2004July 10, 2018

There’s No Slowing Down for Human Resources Outsourcing

The worldwide market for outsourcing human resources will grow 21 percent annually, reaching $7 billion by 2008, according to market research firm NelsonHall. While Europe and other non-U.S. regions will grow at a faster rate than the United States, most of the outsourcing money will still be spent in North America in 2008.


Partial outsourcing initiatives–such as payroll outsourcing or benefits outsourcing–will grow at a rate of approximately 8 to 11 percent.


Other findings from the study:


  • Organizations outsourcing multiple human resources processes expect to save between 20 and 40 percent, but are as focused on better results and better metrics as they are on saving money.


  • The manufacturing and financial services industries will continue to be industries ripe for outsourcing. Retail and government may be next in line.


  • Exult/Hewitt leads the North American market for full-scale human resources outsourcing (not partial outsourcing, where ADP has been a long-time leader). Accenture HR Services and ACS are also major players.


The human resources outsourcing market is experiencing “acquisition fever,” with sixteen major acquisitions between April 2003 and April 2004, and it’s not likely to let up.

Posted on July 26, 2004July 10, 2018

The Plus Factor

You’re in the office of Rick Garcia, a department manager for the online version of Working People magazine. He is struggling to decide which of two applicants will be hired. One has slightly superior skills and a proven record of performance. The other is also well qualified but has less experience. The first candidate is Hispanic and the second is African-American. Rick’s department is 60 percent Hispanic and has no African-Americans even though the magazine’s editor, Margaret Chen, has made diversity one of the publication’s core values.



    As Rick wrestles with the problem, the action before you freezes. You’re in the midst of an online diversity-training program. His dilemma becomes yours as the narrator asks: “How would you advise Rick regarding his hiring decision?”


    Thousands of companies are facing such decisions today as they attempt to build diverse workplaces. And since the Supreme Court’s June 24, 2003, decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, the answer to this diversity-training exercise has started to change. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, writing for a divided court, has approved the careful use of race in educational settings as a “plus” factor in individual selections, recognizing the critical importance of building a diverse student body. Now the time has arrived to consider whether this legal lesson should be applied to the corporate workplace.


    In today’s volatile corporate world, the only constant in a company’s formula for success is change. To be competitive, companies must look for new ways to connect with the clients they aim to serve, and to do so they must embrace diversity. The court’s decision has taken the old rule that race could be used as a plus factor only when two student applicants were equally qualified (i.e., almost never, as it is virtually impossible to be “equally qualified”) and modified it to allow race as a “plus” factor with respect to qualified individuals. This seemingly slight shift from equally qualified to merely qualified creates a foundation for a qualified minority candidate to bypass a qualified non-minority candidate on the basis of race as the “plus” factor. Each situation is judged separately, but the years of whispers and legal fiction may finally be coming to an end. If Justice O’Connor’s rationale for law school selection criteria is applied to the workplace, race could be considered in the building of a workplace that honors diversity among qualified applicants. Companies desiring to change the composition of their current staff that have been unable to justify the selection of one well-qualified candidate over another well-qualified candidate may now be able to more openly use race or other “diverse characteristics” as a “plus” factor.


    Although at one time they were faltering, corporate diversity programs are now being reborn and structured to mirror many of the criteria used by the University of Michigan Law School. Take Merrill Lynch, for instance. One month after the Grutter decision, the company formed both an external diversity advisory board and an internal diversity employee advisory council in the hope of creating a meritocracy with a diversity focus. One reason why the panels were established was so that Merrill Lynch could look internally at how it was preparing its employees to meet the ever-changing needs of the business environment. Merrill Lynch wanted to develop a diverse employee pool and generate diverse business. The company’s openness about its commitment to diversity is establishing a trend that other Fortune 500 companies are sure to follow. If there is any doubt about this trend, enter the words “diversity program” into an Internet search engine and inventory the corporate giants that emerge. From Dell, Microsoft and IBM to General Motors, Johnson & Johnson and General Electric, companies understand that diversity is essential to success in the 21st century.


    And now let’s go back to the hypothetical Working People magazine, and Rick Garcia’s decision between two qualified but unequal applicants. Should he hire the more qualified candidate, regardless of race? Should he hire the African-American candidate but be careful not to admit that race played a role in the decision? Or should he hire only a qualified candidate but consider the positive impact of improving workplace diversity as part of the decision-making process?


    Applying the message sent by Justice O’Connor in Grutter, the last choice becomes the most correct one. Of course, hiring decisions are complex, and review by the human resources and legal departments is always wise in situations that could threaten litigation. Nonetheless, the court has issued a bold legal mandate justifying the use of race as a “plus factor” when choosing between qualified candidates. Many employers are interpreting this mandate as being broad enough to reach the contemporary workplace. That is not to say that choosing qualified minority candidates over other qualified candidates will not be without controversy for a limited time. The Supreme Court suggests that it may take 25 years before a truly racially blind selection process could become the legal standard without harming needed diversity. This may be a reasonable life span for the lawful use of race in building a nation of diverse workforces.


    Until then, when a workforce more closely parallels the diverse community it serves, a new doorway has opened to achieving diversity without quotas or arbitrary percentages, with an appreciation of the positive contributions of cross-cultural understanding and inclusion. The first steps through this new doorway are taken with awareness of the dangers and risks involved. Nonetheless, it is a journey that corporate America must make.


The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Workforce Management
, August 2004, p. 14 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on July 23, 2004July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce Confront an Employee Who Shares Confidential Information

Dear Tiptoeing:



First, remember that the information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

OK, with that out of the way: Many companies, as a part of their employee policies and procedures, address the issue of sharing confidential company information with unauthorized parties. In fact, confidentiality is so sensitive that in many policies, a confidentiality breach results in immediate termination. If you have a policy, then it would be just a matter of following it, assuming you have credible proof that a violation has occurred.

In the absence of such a policy, you may revert to your regular discipline policy (again, presuming you have one). Many companies have progressive policies that start with a verbal warning, escalate to written warnings and, finally, mandate either suspension or termination for continued violations. However, in the area of confidentiality, you may not want to give the employee another chance to violate, which is why many discipline policies have immediate-termination clauses for acts of “gross misconduct.” You would have to determine, with appropriate counsel, the severity of the act and whether it constitutes gross misconduct.

In either case, be sure you have solid proof of a violation, rather than the hearsay of other employees. Then confront the employee as soon as possible. Document your conversations and set clear, written boundaries for future action, so that there is no ambiguity as to your expectations about conduct or the consequences of violations.

Meet with the employee and point out the issue and its severity, noting that continued violations will result in progressive discipline.

In some cases, he may be a valued employee who nonetheless has this one fault. Or perhaps he holds a key position in the organization. You could try restricting the employee’s access to confidential information. If that isn’t possible, try to find another position within the company that doesn’t involve access to sensitive information. If neither of those is workable, you may have to suffer the short-term loss of letting the person go, knowing that the company will be much more stable in the long run.

SOURCE: Bill Dickmeyer, CEBS, Madison Human Resources Consulting, LLC, Madison, Wisconsin, Sept. 3, 2003.

LEARN MORE: Please readWhat to Do When a Disciplined Employee Tells Her Story.



The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on July 23, 2004July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Do I Overcome the Recruiting Blahs

Dear Down in the Dumps:



Let’s see here…your goals are not your own and clearly you aren’t looking to make them your own. Yet obviously you feel the frustration of having to meet someone else’s goals–goals you don’t buy into. You regret the “disposable” attitude of your firm and include yourself as one of its members (hopefully).

What to do? Either get out of the game or get some skin in it. Whiners can’t lead, and leaders aren’t about to stand still for letting vice presidents or anyone else set goals for them.

You have three choices:

  • Make those goals your own and start working to achieve them.
  • Accept the preset goals, but methodically build a case as to why these goals harm the company financially.
  • Present compelling data to top management to persuade them that you have a better handle on what the proper time to fill a job should be.

Whatever you choose, be prepared to take responsibility for it, because the current cost is way too high. What you do (or don’t do) can negatively affect the careers–and the lives–of a lot of people, yours included. If you assume you’re a partner and act like it, you might still get fired. But you’ll be better off than you are now.

Who interviewed the 21 people who left this year? I doubt it was you. Interview the interviewer and then personally call–after hours–every person who has been gone for 90 days or more. Use a structured technique to elicit what “disposable” really means on a behavioral level. Think about what the firm must do to reduce turnover and retain solid employees. Do what you have to do to sell your idea and begin the change process. Become the company’s “retention champion,” and measure the return on investment of keeping top-notch people.

The answer to your recruiting blahs: change your attitude about making a difference. Your willingness to display a different attitude will challenge you to use and develop business skills, as well as own and embrace clear performance goals as a condition of how you work. In the end, your success is an absolute certainty. You will either prove your skills, determine what you need to learn to improve hiring results, or find that your skills, work ethic and attitude would be better appreciated in another environment. Ask yourself which person you would hire for a senior recruiting position–the one with the blahs or the “new you.”

Oh, and by the way, a recent study by Staffing.org of 1,500 firms indicates the average “time to start” is 70 days.

SOURCE:Gerry Crispin, co-author ofCareerXroads, Kendall Park, New Jersey, Sept. 11, 2003.

LEARN MORE:Curing the Turnover Disease.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on July 23, 2004July 10, 2018

Job-hopping On the Rise

The percentage of American employees who chose to change employers has increased for the fourth consecutive quarter, according to Lee Hecht Harrison.


International Communications Research did the study for Lee Hecht Harrison, surveying 1,019 adult Americans by phone.


Bernadette Kenny is executive vice president for Lee Hecht Harrison. “During the depths of the downturn,” she says, “most people who weren’t laid off, or in imminent danger, stayed put. They were grateful to have jobs, even if they weren’t happy in them. Now with the recovery making slow but steady strides and new jobs opening up, more workers seem emboldened to make a move.”


As to whether the proverbial “war for talent” is back, Kenny tells Workforce Management that “I do not think it ever ended.” Sure, says Kenny, there are plenty of people looking for jobs. But employers, she says, are just bringing people on board slowly. “They’re being very, very cautious,” she says, because they realize how expensive it can be if a new hire doesn’t work out. “At some level, the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t know.”


To deal with the increase in job-hopping, Kenny says that senior management needs to make a decision about whether the company wants to be an employer of choice. If so, she says, “that cascades into a lot of decisions.” Companies will want to identify who their talented employees and potential employees are. They also need to groom replacements for the top talent so that the high-potential employees can get promoted.


Employment Status At End of the Quarter Compared to Beginning
 20042003
 2nd Quarter 1st  Q4th  Q 3rd Q 2nd Q
You left your employer voluntarily for a new job6.0 percent5.34.73.93.8


 

Posted on July 23, 2004July 10, 2018

When it Comes to Health Information, Consumers are Coming Up Short

Consumers don’t seem to be getting the information they need to make smart and economical health care decisions, according to the initial findings from Mercer/Harvard study of consumer-driven health plans. 
 
Only 16 percent of people enrolled in health reimbursement accounts were provided information about doctors and medical groups that would help them choose based on costs. Similarly, only 17 percent were provided cost information to help them choose a hospital.
 
Also, according to the report, information that would help people manage a chronic condition was provided to only 34 percent of enrollees in the health reimbursement accounts.
 
The irony is that consumerism is based on the idea that employees will make better health care decisions if they are educated about the cost and quality of care. According to the Mercer/Harvard study, “Rather than simply increase cost sharing, consumer-directed health plans are purported to empower individuals to make informed choices with regard to their health and health care.”
 
The study of more than 300 major health plans was funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Posted on July 20, 2004July 10, 2018

Some Employers Worry They’ll Pay the Price for Marijuana Use

With 11 states now allowing doctors to prescribe marijuana–and legislation pending in several other states–some employers are concerned that they will be liable if an employee causes an accident while under the influence.
 
Cyndi Fischer is a human resources manager at Advanced Power Technology in Bend, Oregon. “We try to accommodate the employees if we can,” Fischer tells Business Insurance. But, she says, “we have to make sure it’s a safe environment for both the employee and the rest of the employees who work here.”
 
Medical-marijuana laws are creating confusion for employers. In some states, the state laws contradict federal laws. In other states, the laws are ambiguous, according to Business Insurance. In Oregon, for example, the law says employers don’t have to accommodate the use of marijuana at work. While that bans employees from smoking pot on the job, it’s unclear how that affects drug tests and whether an employee who fails an employer’s test needs to be accommodated.

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress