Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on August 6, 2004July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce What Are People Doing About Health Costs

Dear Creative Solutions:



When it comes to priorities, controlling health care costs tops employers’ benefits-related agendas. Many employers find themselves having to make changes to the plan’s design at the 11th hour to address a large rate increase. Sometimes the employer must accept the increase and share it with the participants. Unfortunately, these solutions are temporary and do not distinguish among low, medium and high users of the plan.

Flexible-benefit plans sought to mitigate this same predicament back in the 1980s and 1990s. Although not a new concept, flex plans are making a comeback as the composition of the U.S. workforce continues to change, and as employees feel the pinch of increased premiums. With a flex program, the employer can adopt a “defined contribution” approach to benefits, deciding at the start of each plan year how much it will spend on benefits that year. Then, the employer makes available various levels of coverage at various prices. At open enrollment, employees can either tailor their benefits and contributions to fit their own needs or choose to receive cash compensation instead.

More recently, employers have begun introducing consumerism and consumer-driven plans that also can be viewed as an attempt at equitable distribution of health care dollars. In one model, the employer allocates a specific dollar amount to a Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) for each covered person (perhaps $1,000). The account is used to reimburse the first $1,000 of medical expenses before a “high” deductible kicks in and a traditional medical plan is layered on top. For big users of medical care, the account balance will be zero at the end of the year. For low users, accounts may be used to reimburse over-the-counter drugs, dental, vision or other qualified expenses, or the person may roll the balance to accumulate in future years.

Perhaps a hybrid approach would have the employer offering more than one high deductible option as part of a consumer-driven health offering (perhaps $1,500 and $3,000). People who don’t use medical care as much would be able to buy into the $3,000 deductible option at a lower contribution rate.

Regardless of what form they take, health plan designs that promote consumerism, make employees more aware of costs, and foster equitable treatment of all employees will play a growing role in employers’ health care cost management efforts.

SOURCE: Elizabeth A. Dudek, Vice President, The Segal Company, Washington, D.C., Sept. 22, 2003.

LEARN MORE: Please read ourFour Questions About Consumer-Driven Health Plans.

The information contained in this article is intended to provide useful information on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question
Dear Workforce Newsletter
Posted on August 5, 2004July 10, 2018

Sample Domestic Violence Prevention Policy

Companies wishing to develop an in-house domestic violence policy might want to take a look at this document provided by the Corporate  Alliance to End Partner Violence.



Introduction
   
(Company Name) seeks to provide a work environment free from violence or threats of violence against individuals, groups, or employees, or threats against company property-including partner violence that may occur on our property. This policy requires that all individuals on company premises or while representing the Company conduct themselves in a professional manner consistent with good business practices and in absolute conformity with non-violence principles and standards.


Definition
   
For purposes of this policy, workplace violence is defined as a single behavior or series of behaviors which constitute actual or potential assault, battery, harassment, intimidation, threats or similar actions, attempted destruction, or threats to Company or personal property; which occur in a Company workplace, at a Company work location, or while an individual is engaged in Company business.


Company Response
   
(Company Name) strictly prohibits use of violence or threats of violence in the workplace and views such actions very seriously. The possession of weapons in the workplace, threats, threatening or menacing behavior, stalking, or acts of violence against employees, visitors, guests, or other individuals by anyone on (Company Name) property will not be tolerated. Violations of this policy will lead to disciplinary actions up to and including termination of employment and the involvement of appropriate law enforcement authorities as needed.


    Any person who makes substantial threats, exhibits threatening behavior, or engages in violent acts on (Company Name) premises shall be removed from the property as quickly as safety permits, and may be asked to remain away from (Company Name) premises pending the outcome of an investigation into the incident. People who commit these acts outside the workplace but which impact the workplace are also violating this policy and will be dealt with appropriately.


    When threatening behavior is exhibited or acts of violence are committed, (Company Name) will initiate an appropriate response. This response may include, but is not limited to, evaluation by (Company Name) Employee Assistance Professionals and/or external professionals, suspension and/or termination of any business relationship, reassignment of job duties, suspension or termination of employment, and/or criminal prosecution of the person/persons involved.


    No existing (Company Name) policy, practice, or procedure should be interpreted to prohibit decisions designed to prevent a threat from being carried out, a violent act from occurring, or a life-threatening situation from developing.


Reporting Procedure
    (Company Name) personnel are responsible for notifying the designated management representative of any threats which they have witnessed, received, or have been told that another person has witnessed or received-including those related to partner violence. Even without an actual threat, personnel should also report any behavior they have witnessed which they regard as threatening or violent, when that behavior is job related or might be carried out on a company controlled site or is connected to company employment. Employees are responsible for making this report regardless of the relationship between the individual who initiated the threat or threatening behavior and the person or persons who were threatened or were the focus of the threatening behavior. If the designated representative is not available, personnel should report the threat to their supervisor or another member of the management team.


    (Company Name) understands the sensitivity of the information requested and has developed confidentiality procedures, which recognize and respect the privacy of the reporting employee(s). Consistent with the values of (Company Name), people should take action in ways that maintain respect and dignity for individuals while acting in an accountable and swift manner to address the situation.


Protective or Restraining Orders
    All individuals who apply for and obtain a protective or restraining order which lists company locations as being protected areas, must provide to the designated management representative a copy of the petition and order.


Designated Management Representative
 
Name:


Title:


Department:


Telephone:


Location:


Partner Violence and the Workplace
   
(Company Name) recognizes impact of partner violence on the workplace. Partner violence is defined by (Company Name) as abusive behavior occurring between two people in an intimate relationship. It may include physical violence, sexual, emotional, and psychological intimidation, verbal abuse, stalking, and economic control.


    (Company Name) is committed to heightening awareness of partner violence and providing guidance for employees and management to address the occurrence of partner violence and its effects on the workplace.


    (Company Name) intends to make assistance available to employees involved in partner violence. This assistance may include: confidential means for coming forward for help, resource and referral information, special considerations at the workplace for employee safety, work schedule adjustments, or leave necessary to obtain medical, counseling, or legal assistance, and workplace relocation (if available). In responding to partner violence, (Company Name) will maintain appropriate confidentiality and respect for the rights of the employee involved.


    (Company Name) intends to publish, maintain, and post in locations of high visibility, a list of resources for survivors and perpetrators of partner violence.


    (Company Name) will not deny job benefits or other programs to employees based solely on partner violence related problems. When employees confide that a job performance or conduct problem is related to partner violence, in addition to appropriate corrective or disciplinary action consistent with company policy and procedure, a referral for appropriate assistance should be made to the employee.


Leave Options for Employees Experiencing Threats of Violence
    (Company Name) will make every effort to assist an employee experiencing threats of violence. If an employee needs to be absent from work due to threats of violence, the length of the absence will be determined by the individual’s situation through collaboration with the employee and (fill in appropriate title(s) for your company.) [Examples may include: supervisor/manager, Human Resources representative, union representative, etc.]


    Employees, managers, and supervisors (or appropriate titles for your company) are encouraged to first explore paid leave options that can be arranged to help the employee cope with the situation without having to take a formal unpaid leave of absence. Depending on circumstances, this may include:


  • Arranging flexible work hours so the employee can seek protection, go to court, look for new housing, enter counseling, arrange child care, etc.
  • Considering use of sick time, job sharing, compensatory time, paid leave, informal unpaid leave, etc., particularly if requests are for relatively short periods.

Suggested Procedures for Safety and Protection of Employees Experiencing Threats of Violence


Employee


  • Encourage the employee to save any threatening e-mail or voice-mail messages. These can potentially be used for future legal action, or can serve as evidence that an existing restraining order was violated.
  • The employee should obtain a restraining order that includes the workplace, and keep a copy on hand at all times. The employee may consider providing a copy to the police, his/her supervisor, security, or human resources [or appropriate individuals/departments within your company].
  • The employee should provide a picture of the perpetrator to reception areas and/or security.
  • The employee should identify an emergency contact person should the employer be unable to contact the victim.
  • If an absence is deemed appropriate, the employee should be clear about the plan to return to work. While absent, the employee should maintain contact with the appropriate Human Resources personnel

Employer


  • Arrange the victim to have priority parking near the building.
  • Have calls screened, transferring harassing calls to security-or have the employee’s name removed from automated phone directories.
  • Limit information about employees disclosed by phone. Information that would help locate a victim or indicates a time of return should not be provided.
  • Relocate the employee’s workspace to a more secure area or another site.
  • The employer should have trained EAP professionals or external professionals assist the employee with development of a safety plan
  • Work with local law enforcement personnel, and encourage employees to do so regarding situations outside the workplace.

Source:Corporate Alliance to End Partner Violence. CAEPV provides this sample for the SOLE PURPOSE of guidance in development of their own policies. Any policy developed by a company should always be with the advice of that company’s legal counsel.

Posted on August 4, 2004July 10, 2018

Wal-Mart May Finally Get a Union

A Canadian Wal-Mart store may become “the first affiliate of the retail giant to be unionized,” according to the Associated Press.


A labor board in Quebec accredited a union in the Saguenay area, a couple of hours from Quebec City, to represent the workers.


The United Food and Commercial Workers Canada says that Wal-Mart is likely to fight the ruling. According to the AP, in the past, “Wal-Mart has cited Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms in its legal challenge of the Saskatchewan Labor Relations Board’s authority.” The company, in other words, isn’t happy with Canada’s laws regarding the forming of unions. An August 20 hearing will be held to finalize the makeup of the union. It’s also possible that Wal-Mart could choose to close the store.


Michael J. Fraser, the food worker’s national director for Canada, tells the CCNMatthews wire service that “What’s happened in Quebec can happen at any Wal-Mart store in North America.” This union drive, he says, “is only the first of more to come.”

Posted on August 2, 2004July 10, 2018

Hilton Tries to Clone the Model Employee

In the highly competitive lodging industry, where consumers often can choose from among a dozen or more hotels and motels clustered within a few blocks of each other, considerable effort goes into getting and keeping an edge. There are free shuttles, happy-hour drinks, in-room Internet connections, on-demand movies.




    And then there’s the question of customer service. Achieving and maintaining good service is especially difficult in an industry with notoriously high turnover rates and legions of low-skilled workers.



    “Quite frankly, whatever product we have, a competitor can copy,” says Jim Hartigan, senior vice president for customer quality and performance for Hilton Hotels Corp. “A certain kind of bed, a television, a shower head–that can be copied. What can’t be copied is the genuine, personal service.”



    Hilton Hotels these days is a lodging company that others strive to beat when it comes to customer service. In the latest American Customer Satisfaction Index survey, Hilton won top honors in the hotel-industry sector, edging out rival Marriott International Inc. The ACSI randomly samples consumers to measure their level of satisfaction with and valuation of products and services. Hilton has been at or near the top of the hotel list for the last few years.



    “Clearly there is something going on here,” says David Van Amburg, managing director of ACSI. “Hilton, more years than not, is significantly ahead of the industry.”



    Hartigan says it should come as no surprise that Hilton lands at the top of the ACSI list because the company spends millions of dollars each year training and rewarding employees in customer service and then surveying customers to measure how well it all works. The company is convinced that the investment pays off in better performance at its family of brands, which include Embassy Suites, Homewood Suites, Hilton Garden Inns, Hampton Inns and Doubletree.


    Hilton also scores high in the J.D. Power & Associates customer-satisfaction survey. Its Embassy Suites has topped the upscale-hotel segment for three straight years, while the latest survey listed Hilton Garden Inns as number one in the mid-priced segment. Homewood Suites won top honors in the extended-stay segment.


Allowing cloning
    Hilton’s position on these lists stems from a combination of hiring and training systems, regular feedback and customer polling to track satisfaction. The company has an extra challenge in spreading its service culture across its properties because so many are owned by franchisees. Of its 140,000 employees, half work for franchisees. Hilton requires franchisees to use some of its procedures, encourages the use of others and provides guidance in various customer-service techniques.


    In hiring, Hilton relies heavily on referrals from existing employees. The interview process includesbehavioral screening–in which, for example, prospective employees are asked how they dealt with a confrontational situation. Managers are trained in using and assessing behavioral screening.


    Hilton is testing a new screening system at its Hilton Garden Inns that tries to clone its best employees by mapping their desirable qualities. Last year, employees rated as top performers were given a written test designed to assess their aptitudes and preferences. The answers were used to produce a snapshot of the model employee. Starting in January, prospective new hires are being given similar tests and evaluated according to how close they come to the model. If the process indeed succeeds in pointing managers to service-oriented recruits, it will be rolled out system-wide.


    Once hired, new employees across the Hilton chain must go through 1.5 hours of customer-service training before they start. New managers, including those at franchised hotels, must undergo 40 hours of training in customer service designed not only to drill into them the basics of customer service but also to give them the means to encourage and promote it with their staffs.


    There are also periodic updates of customer-service training, including some sent around the chain in film format. One uses the character of Norm from the old TV sitcom Cheers as an example of how to build a relationship with a repeat customer. (Norm, you may recall, was so well known at the fictional bar that he was always greeted by name the moment he entered, and by the time he reached his favorite bar stool, there was a cold mug of his favorite beer waiting.)


    To reinforce the idea that good service is important, Hilton regularly rewards employees through two programs used at both owned and franchised hotels. One, called “Catch Me at My Best,” gives customers the opportunity to nominate employees who provide especially good service. Winners get cash awards and merchandise. The cost to Hilton: more than $1 million a year.


    A second program, called “Spirit of Pride,” has employees nominating other employees for customer-service recognition. Winners get a $350 check and a celebration in their honor, complete with banners, music, cards and a congratulatory call from the corporate office. The company selected 350 winners this year and expects to increase that total to 700 next year. The cost is split with franchisees. Hilton’s corporate contribution, now at $500,000 annually, will rise to more than $1 million.


    Finally, Hilton runs its own customer-satisfaction tracking to keep tabs on whether its efforts are producing results as reflected in what customers say. Hilton surveys about 60,000 customers each month by mail and e-mail, then makes the results available online to its managers so they can see exactly what customers have to say on a variety of customer-service issues. Hilton spends more than $1.5 million each year conducting the surveys.


    Hartigan says Hilton believes that the focus on customer service pays dividends in the form of profits, and he points to something called RevPAR figures as proof.


The “real measurement”
    RevPAR stands for revenue per available room. It is derived by multiplying a hotel’s average room rate by its occupancy rate. The better the RevPAR, the more money a hotel is likely to make (although other factors such as restaurants, golf courses and casinos can also affect the bottom line).



    Companies are rated on a RevPAR index, with 100 being the norm. Hotels with under 100 are losing out to hotels with over 100. Hilton reported that as of February, all of its brands except Doubletree had RevPAR indexes above 100, led by Embassy Suites with 123.9. (The statistics are from Smith Travel Research.)



    Van Amburg says that Hilton’s business performance is typical of companies with strong customer-service ratings. In the ACSI rankings, companies in the top half far outperform those in the bottom half. He has also found that companies with high ACSI scores tend to provide higher returns to shareholders. “There is a very strong connection between firms that do a good job of satisfying customers and their performance in the stock market,” Van Amburg says.



    Indeed, Wachovia Securities Inc. analysts recently named Hilton Hotels Corp. one of their top picks in the lodging sector, and several other analysts have been recommending Hilton stock as a good investment. While stock analysts tend to focus on more concrete factors such as Hilton’s strong cash flow and its positioning in key markets experiencing a lodging upswing, Hartigan points out that a large part of what draws customers–especially repeat customers–is how well they are served.



    “At the end of the day, the real measurement is how you are doing in the marketplace,” Hartigan says. “All of our brands command market-share premium.”

Posted on July 30, 2004June 29, 2023

Social-Networking for Recruiters

When Geoff Workman, vice president of business development with the online event registration company Acteva, was recently looking for a consultant who specialized in payment processing, he didn’t advertise it on a job site; he looked for passive candidates on a social-networking Web site, LinkedIn. That’s how he found Scott Loftesness, principal at the consulting firm Glenbrook Partners. “He referenced his company’s blog and Web site,” Workman says. “I started paying attention to the blog and Web site, realized they were indeed the experts I was looking for and contacted him. Now his firm is engaged in a contract with us, and there’s no way I’d have found them by a Google search, or without LinkedIn.”



    “Social networking” is the business buzzword of the moment. It’s become conventional wisdom among recruiters and workforce-management professionals that friends of friends (or friends of friends of friends) often make the best candidates. More than a hundred Web sites attempting to map and facilitate these interpersonal relationships have sprung up in the last few years. They might be the future of both job-hunting and recruiting–even if they’re not quite there yet.


    Among the social-networking sites currently operating, there is an immense variety of goals and means. There are personal sites (Friendster, MySpace), professional sites (Ryze, LinkedIn, ZeroDegrees), and sites that cover both sides of their users’ lives (Orkut, Tribe). Some business-oriented sites are built for targeted contacts: getting users in touch with specific people via friends of friends. Others are better suited for “crawling”: searching for people by shared interests, former employers or chains of personal recommendations. Big money is flowing into social networking. Barry Diller’s InterActive Corp. acquired ZeroDegrees earlier this year. Sequoia Capital has invested in LinkedIn, and Google is throwing its weight behind Orkut.


    Many of the sites rely on their users to input information directly. A few, like Eliyon and Spoke, harvest data about people wherever they can find it. And Clay Shirky, an adjunct professor at New York University’s Interactive Telecommunications Program, notes that services that had existing social networks and didn’t see the rise of social-networking software coming, such as Monster and Yahoo, have been reintegrating the idea of formal social networking into their operations.


Networks in action
    The largest business-oriented social-networking site, LinkedIn, claimed 800,000 registered users, most of them white-collar workers, as of July 2004. It is based on targeted networking, and guards its users’ privacy carefully; you can see who your contacts’ contacts are, but you have to be vetted by people you both know to communicate with them. The company recently partnered with DirectEmployers Association to provide job listings.


    Another major player in the field, Ryze, with upwards of 80,000 registered users, almost all professionals of one kind or another, was founded in 2001, ahead of the social-network curve. It centers on message boards meant for “interacting” and “growing organizations”–more business-based community-building than job-seeking. And it sponsors real-world events where users can meet. Other business-based networking sites include Monster Networking (which proactively introduces professional peers to each other) and ZeroDegrees (which distinguishes between “contacts,” “members,” “friends” and “inner circle,” and relies on a friends-of-friends introduction system similar to LinkedIn’s).


    Doug Stone, CEO of the interactive marketing firm Abstract Edge, was looking for a vice president of marketing and business development last fall, and ended up finding a half dozen candidates–and hiring one–via Ryze. “We used their data tools to conduct searches on everything from some of our competitors’ company names to keywords like marketing, interactive marketing and vice president of sales,” he says. At this point, Stone says, he’s likely to use LinkedIn as well for similar searches. “There are gatekeepers in LinkedIn–not anybody can contact anybody–and as a result I think higher-caliber people are willing to join it.”


    Workman agrees: “I think the digerati are very well represented within LinkedIn–it’s company founders, top executives.” He uses it extensively to recruit contractors and to look for candidates for the company’s full-time job openings, half of which are director level or higher. Workman also notes that LinkedIn is useful to him for running background checks on candidates, and finding out who they used to work with who doesn’t show up on their references. “The great thing about those references is that they haven’t been in touch with the candidate–it’s good for independent reference checking.”


Benefit could diminish
    As widespread as networking sites now are, though, the experts are skeptical about how useful they can be to recruiters in their current form. “The key on the Net is not who you know but who knows you,” says online-recruiting consultant Peter Weddle. “Networking is absolutely the secret weapon for effective online recruiting; it’s one of the best ways to reap passive job-seekers. But the yield from social networking is considerably lower than from the chat areas, bulletin boards and so on where like-minded professionals talk to their peers.”


    Compared to sites that require users to map their own social networks, Weddle says, Eliyon Technologies’ site “is much more robust–they’ve used their spider to compile dossiers on over 19 million Americans.” For free, he says, users can type in the name of a company and get a list of the people on whom the company has built dossiers.


    That “free” will be a factor in social software’s future usefulness, according to Peter Zollman, founding principal of the consulting service Classified Intelligence. “Right now, if you want to find people who work for a specific company, you can. But as soon as these sites start charging and people start dropping out, that benefit [for recruiters] is substantially diminished.” In other words, the pool of users who’d be willing to pay to use networking sites is likely to be substantially smaller, with a higher ratio of active to passive job-seekers.


Risky introductions
    Social technology and social networks are, significantly, not the same thing. As Molly Wright Steenson, associate professor of connected communities at the Interaction Design Institute in Ivrea, Italy, points out, economic systems and nation-states also qualify as social networks: they work because of personal relationships. Steenson argues that what’s needed to make social software more useful to recruiters are better ways of visualizing exactly how individual networks work. “Recruiters naturally try to understand who is a ‘sticky node’: who’s going to be the gold mine for the people they don’t already know. Decent visualization tools might make it easier to find out who seems like they’d know the right person. But there aren’t a lot of those tools.”


    And the sort of targeted networking available through sites like LinkedIn and ZeroDegrees, Steenson suggests, may actually be counterproductive: “Let’s say there’s someone who wants to meet my friend the CEO, and is using LinkedIn to try to pass the message to me. Whether or not I’d want to introduce someone to my important friend is going to depend on what I think of the person, because if I waste someone’s time, I’m going to damage my own relationship with that person”–and a friend-of-a-friend connection makes that sort of introduction much riskier.


The future of social networking
    Most experts agree that the purely social Web networks aren’t too useful for recruiters, but that hybrid social/business sites may be somewhat more helpful. Shirky says, “If you go to Orkut or Tribe communities and say, ‘We’re looking for this kind of person,’ that’s midway between crawling–searching by interest–and targeting, or being introduced to someone. But it also means that you have to do a lot more filtering of inappropriate candidates.”


    In any case, the mini-bubble of networking sites may well contract. That’s partly because the market can’t support hundreds of them, but also because the more there are, the less useful each one becomes–users don’t like the hassle of dealing with more than a few sites.


    Acteva’s Workman notes that networking sites are still in their infancy, and doesn’t believe they’ll ever replace conventional job-search sites altogether. But he does think that they can be a strong supplement. “Right now, they’re a secondary or tertiary tool that helps us find highly specialized consultants for given projects, and prospective candidates for positions,” he says. For now, social-networking sites are a large, unruly experiment, cash infusions notwithstanding. The real usefulness for recruiters is yet to come. Says Zollman: “I don’t know how many people have signed up on social-networking sites because they honestly believe this is a way to improve their business, and how many have signed up because they want to see what happens.”


Workforce Management, August 2004, pp. 70-73 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on July 30, 2004July 10, 2018

Success, Scandinavian Style

From her office in the leafy suburb of Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, northwest of Philadelphia, Pernille Spiers-Lopez laughs pleasantly but briefly. The president of Ikea North America, the fast-growing arm of the Swedish global retailing giant, confirms that like many of her 7,000-plus employees, she’s read a recent front-page story about her company in The Onion, the oh-so-hip national humor magazine. The article describes Ikea as an “epidemic of self-assembled, clean-lined modernist furniture” that “claimed another 10,000 American lifestyles in 2003.” Referring to the fictitious malady, she says, “Oh yes. That’s a very good condition to have, absolutely.” Spiers-Lopez adds that she hopes nobody ever stamps out Ikea’s particular strain of “infection.”



    Her lilting Danish accent makes it impossible to tell whether the expression is deadpan or earnest, delivering a punch line or a mission statement. Any student of the Ikea phenomenon, or even just a regular visitor to one of Ikea’s huge furniture and furnishings emporiums, inevitably notices a curious convergence of whimsy and hard sell, of a seemingly laid-back sales force and a mazelike floor plan that keeps shoppers captivated for hours, of $3.99 Grunka fish spatulas and $1.99 Vållö plastic watering cans displayed alongside motivational tableaux of moderately priced all-Ikea kitchens, bedrooms, living rooms and home offices. Hallowed company traditions and doctrine are coupled with constant reminders that everyone must continually embrace responsibility, risk and change. Most significant, perhaps, is the fact that the Ikea way of doing business combines a very Scandinavian embrace of paternalistic employment policies and a social safety net with a hard-core drive for profits and market share that bows to no competitor, anywhere, anytime.


    Pernille (pronounced “PEN-Nilla”) Spiers-Lopez, a former journalism student, traveling saleswoman and human resources executive, embodies both the rewards and dangers of this idiosyncratic mixture. She is in her mid-40s, married, with two children. After an “epiphany” at a women’s conference in 1997 and her appointment as Ikea’s head of North American human resources in 1998, Spiers-Lopez began radically changing the company’s approach to benefits, corporate culture, chain of command and work/life balance. On top of offering full benefits for domestic partners, in 2002 she initiated full medical and dental benefits for part-time employees working a minimum of 20 hours a week. Ikea only recently began deducting $5 to $10 a month from paychecks for individual coverage of full-time workers and $140 a month for their families. Part-time workers who work less than 20 hours a week pay $64 to $185.


    Staff turnover has decreased from 76 percent to 36 percent during Spiers-Lopez’s tenure as president. She has overseen an increase in the number of stores in the United States and Canada from 18 to 31. Ikea plans to add five new stores per year in North America over the next 10 years. Whether the effort will contribute substantially to its bottom line is uncertain. As a private company, Ikea releases no profit figures, but in her three years as president, while much of the retail industry has been in economic intensive care, Spiers-Lopez has raised total revenue in the United States from $1.2 billion to $1.4 billion.


    Observers like Kurt Barnard, president of a consultancy in Montclair, New Jersey, called Retail Forecasting, are impressed. “Ikea’s past has been brilliant,” he says. “Its future here will be the same.” David Sievers, a retail expert at Archstone Consulting in Stamford, Connecticut, is less sanguine. “Its [imported] merchandise isn’t as culturally sensitive to low-end or value-conscious shoppers as I’d expect it to be,” he says, adding that Target does a better job where the two chains’ product lines overlap. Sievers adds that the lines are long and the service “terrible” at the Ikea in New Jersey near his home, and he suspects that because nearly all of Ikea’s products are produced overseas, the weak U.S. dollar is cutting into Ikea North America’s profit margin.


    But for those who pay attention to human resources, Ikea’s programs are often cited as being well above average. A full-press diversity drive was instituted in 2000, with individual stores’ managers and human resources heads trained intensively in subjects like which organizations to contact to find qualified minority candidates and how to adjust standard interviewing techniques to put job applicants at ease. Managers are then evaluated yearly on how well they’ve met the goal of having their workforces mirror the racial and ethnic makeup of the communities they serve. “We’ve already done it for our hourly workforce,” says Sari Brody, Ikea’s manager of leadership and diversity. “In top management we’re about halfway there.” Spiers-Lopez credits flexibility and near-constant movement for keeping her “coworkers,” as they’re known at Ikea, engaged. Footloose 20-somethings are eagerly accommodated when, for instance, they’d like to spend a year or two working for Ikea in Malaysia or Manchester.


    The needs of older workers are also addressed. Spiers-Lopez has initiated flextime, job-sharing and telecommuting programs. When Lori Schilling, head of human resources at the Ikea store in Covina, California, adopted a 3-year-old girl with her husband early last year, she realized that her priorities were changing. She wanted to spend more time at home while keeping her job. She negotiated an arrangement with both her supervisors and direct reports to work seven days a week every two-week period. “Every member of my team has taken little bits and pieces of my job,” Schilling says. “They rarely call me at home. At what other company could you do that?”


    It’s become a well-publicized point of pride that each Ikea facility has a “quiet room” where nursing mothers can pump breast milk. New mothers receive six to eight weeks of disability leave plus an additional week of fully paid time off. New fathers and adoptive parents receive the same week of fully paid leave. “This is very progressive, especially for the retail industry,” says Ellen Galinsky of the Families and Work Institute in New York.


    Spiers-Lopez has substantially increased the number of women and minorities in management. Forty-seven percent of the company’s 75 top earners are female. The number of women on Ikea North America’s 14-member management board has increased from one–Spiers-Lopez–to five, including Brody, Ikea’s North America’s marketing manager, its head of new business development and the deputy CFO.


An emigrant’s tale
    Not surprisingly, Spiers-Lopez thinks Barnard’s sunnier assessment of Ikea is more accurate. She was born in a small town outside Arhus, Denmark’s second-largest city. “Out there in the country, very little happens,” she says. “When I was a kid, I thought of America as a big dream, where everything happens.” After college she earned her master’s degree in journalism. For her thesis, she spent six months on Long Island researching an article comparing the health-care systems in the United States and Denmark. “I found good and bad things about both of them,” she says diplomatically.


    At 23 she joined an older brother who was working in a furniture store in Florida. “And I remember when I lived in Florida, one night I had this dream that one day I would just drive across the country and live in California. And it happened.” She opened her own import business in 1980, driving 60,000 miles in her Toyota selling Danish postcards and decorative mobiles to gift shops in the Southeast. She settled in Coral Gables, got a $5-an-hour job with a furniture chain called The Door Store, and soon was supervising its 24 branches.


    She drove to West Hollywood in the mid-1980s to take a job with Stor, a now-defunct Ikea imitator. “I think I learned a lot there. But I think what I learned the most is that you can’t copy anyone else. Because then you really don’t know how to fix things if they don’t go exactly right.” She met her husband when he was earning his teaching degree and working part-time for Stor in Orange County, California. Shortly before Ikea purchased the struggling chain, she interviewed for a job at the company her employer was aping, which was just setting foot on the West Coast.


    She was promoted to manager of Ikea’s Pittsburgh store in 1993. Her husband took a job in that city as a high school principal. Her career continued successfully but uneventfully until 1997, when Ikea’s then North American president, a man named Jan Kjellman, asked Spiers-Lopez to attend a businesswomen’s leadership conference in New York City. Inspired by their success stories and encouragement, she then returned to Plymouth Meeting to attend a management board meeting attended by herself and 13 white, mostly Scandinavian men. She said to Kjellman, “We’ve got to do something,” and one month later he promoted her to head of human resources.


Mid-career correction
    Ulf Caap, a three-decade Ikea veteran who has lived in Canada since 1979, considers Spiers-Lopez one of the finest executives he’s ever met. “One of the interesting things about Pernille is that she has the guts and fire to go where few people ever go,” he says. The Swedish-born Caap, who is Spiers-Lopez’s informal mentor within Ikea, says he’s noticed that she sometimes takes on a heavier load than she can safely carry. It was Caap, then Ikea’s head of global training and development, whom Spiers-Lopez called for help five years ago.



Most significant, perhaps, is the fact that the Ikea way of doing business combines a very Scandinavian embrace of paternalistic employment policies and a social safety net with a hard-core drive for profits and market share that bows to no competitor, anywhere, anytime.



    Ironically, Spiers-Lopez’s new assignment to make major changes to the company’s work/life-balance guidelines pushed her to the brink of disaster. When she was promoted, her daughter was starting grade school and her son was starting pre-school. She and her husband decided not to uproot the family. Instead, she either flew or made the six-hour drive between Pittsburgh and Philadelphia several times each week. In 1999, after struggling through a period of increasing fatigue and decreasing job satisfaction, she cracked. One evening she discovered that one of her arms was numb. At the local hospital’s emergency room a doctor told her that her condition was a reaction to stress.


    Ulf Caap says he gave Spiers-Lopez no specific advice but simply guided her toward listening to what her body was saying and asking the right questions. The most basic one was whether she should continue working. She decided she would, reasoning that if she stayed at home, her basic nature would drive her toward becoming something like a golf fanatic or giving so many elaborate dinner parties that her friends would stop coming to them out of sheer exhaustion. Instead, she made a strict rule that her evenings and weekends were reserved for her husband and children. On weekends she enjoys bicycle riding with her family.


    For the most part, she has managed to make this schedule work. She says that her “naturally relaxed” husband and deputized coworkers help her out. “I mean, they make fun of me. We have meetings, and they know that if they don’t say, ‘Let’s take a break,’ they won’t get a break. So they say, ‘Pernille, in order to help you we’re going to all take a break.’ And that way I’m much more conscious about it, but I also realize a part of it is that this is just who I am.”


Design for working
    Ingvar Kamprad, the workaholic founder of Ikea, undoubtedly applauded her decision. Now 78, the press-shy and legendarily frugal mogul still immerses himself deeply in the smallest details of running the $12.2-billion-a-year company, which has more than 76,000 employees and 200 outlets from Oslo to Moscow, Shanghai to Burbank. Kamprad has famously proclaimed that by growing as quickly as possible to sell stylish products at the lowest prices possible, Ikea has created “a better everyday life for the many.” Spiers-Lopez has conferred with him many times. “He is a wonderful man,” she says.


    The influence of Kamprad and Spiers-Lopez can be readily felt throughout Ikea North America. On a recent weekday afternoon at its 13-month-old, 308,000-square-foot store in Costa Mesa, California, the middle-class shoppers are locked in self-service mode, popping small items into bright yellow store-provided carryalls. The bigger items, like Flärke bookcases and Leksvik computer desks, are picked up by the customers themselves downstairs near the loading dock, disassembled inside cardboard “flat packs.” A few sales associates stand on the periphery but do not give assistance or advice unless asked. This ensures lower shipping and storage costs for Ikea and adventures in DIY re-assembly for customers. The whole process, invented by Kamprad, is called “automatic selling.”


    The store’s manager, Don Collins, is taking his turn flipping burgers at a store-sponsored employee barbecue outside. Asked if automatic selling means less work for his staffers, he glares angrily. “Our people aren’t just standing around,” Collins says. “They’re restocking and rearranging their areas, looking for people who need help, thinking about better ways to display the products.”


    Like many in Ikea management, Collins, who is African-American, is a veteran of another retail chain. He worked for 20 years as a manager at J.C. Penney and recalls that he spent most of the time carrying out directives from the central office. At Ikea, he says, he has much more leeway to meet his sales targets however he sees fit. “At Penney’s they told you, ‘Here’s what you need to do.’ At Ikea they say, ‘You need to be the best home-service store in your market segment.’ ” Another big part of his job is to train, develop and ultimately lose his best managers, who are needed to seed new stores opening elsewhere. Each existing store is required to contribute 15 percent of its managers per year to staff new stores. “This year we hit 18 percent,” Collins says proudly.


    He readily admits that there is a trade-off. Non-management employees at the company start at $8.25 an hour at the Costa Mesa store, and only a very few skilled technicians make much more than that. Salespeople do not receive commissions. There are no stock options, of course. Lori Schilling, the Covina human resources chief says, “When I worked for Circuit City there were sales associates who made more money in a year than store managers earn at Ikea today.”


    Still, Collins notes happily that he receives from 15 to 20 applications for every managerial opening. The ratio for hourly jobs is about five applicants to one hire. He does very little advertising for new workers, except for signs posted prominently in the store. “We find that people who shop here are the kind of people who want to work here.”


    That rule certainly applies to Pernille Spiers-Lopez, with two surprising and perhaps hard-won exceptions. When asked whether she envisions ever working for any other company, she responds, “I never make plans too far into the future.” When asked how her home is furnished, she admits that it’s an Ikea showcase–except for her dining room table, a round, thoroughly Danish blond-wood future heirloom. Don’t look for it in her company’s catalog. “I ordered it specially made,” she says, a touch of defiant pride in her voice.


Workforce Management, August 2004, pp. 26-32 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on July 30, 2004July 10, 2018

No Quick Fixes for the Spiraling Costs of Prescription Drugs

At about $10 per dose, Viagra isn’t cheap. But that isn’t stopping consumers from making the drug, which is used for erectile dysfunction, a runaway best seller. Today, many insurance plans cover the expense of the drug–along with other so-called “lifestyle enhancing” medications for problems ranging from male-pattern baldness to wrinkles. Combine these drugs with a new wave of ultra-expensive biotech drugs designed to treat everything from epilepsy to cancer, and it isn’t difficult to understand why some industry observers are sounding the alarm. Prescription-drug costs have climbed at a steady double-digit rate for the last decade. “It’s an alarming situation,” says Connie Perry, a vice president at Aon Consulting.



    Today, some medications run $15,000 or more per month, and even with a 25 percent copayment, a person can drop a few thousand dollars per month on a prescription. Who foots the bill and how copayments and deductibles are set is a point of growing debate. The question, Perry says, is this: “What can employers, employees and others afford? What is reasonable for people to expect?”


    Breakthrough therapies don’t come cheap. Developing a major drug takes seven to 10 years and costs somewhere between $300 million and $1 billion. What’s more, for every success story, pharmaceutical companies typically endure several failures. So when a firm has a major breakthrough, it typically goes after financial rewards aggressively. Today, spurred by television and print advertising–which costs more than $2.5 billion a year–consumers are gobbling up little purple, red and yellow pills with growing fervor. Although 46 percent of physicians view “direct-to-consumer” prescription-drug advertising negatively, according to a 2002 study by the National Health Council, many feel that they’re standing in the path of a loaded freight train.


Swallowing a bitter pill
    For employers, employees and the rest of society, these changes represent a sobering dose of reality. The federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports that the cost of overuse and misuse of prescription drugs is billions of dollars annually. Aon Consulting’s Spring 2004 Health Care Trend Survey reports that employers can expect to see double-digit increases for all types of medical coverage, with HMOs and POS plans forecast to increase by a hefty 14.1 percent for 2004. What’s more, the rise in pharmacy costs–though down slightly from 2003–will likely be 14.4 percent this year.


    “It is questionable whether large populations of people will be able to afford prescription drugs if the prices keep climbing,” says Michael Deskin, president of the Pharmacy Benefits Management Institute, a research organization in Tempe, Arizona.


    The 2004 Drug Trend Report produced by pharmacy benefit manager Medco Health Solutions found that:


  • Spending on treatments for rheumatoid arthritis increased 80.6 percent, and utilization increased 71.2 percent in 2003. Overall, spending for rheumatologic conditions rose 64.5 percent in 2003, driven by a 28.8 percent increase in unit costs and new drug introductions.


  • In 2003, specialty medications represented the largest proportion of total prescription-drug expenditures–8 percent–among children under 19 years of age. The 35-to-49 age group had the second-largest proportion of specialty spending, at 5 percent. Only 1 percent of the outlay for those age 65 and above was for specialty drugs.


  • Spending on drugs used primarily to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder surged 369 percent for children under age 5.


    At the root of this upsurge are changing ideas and expectations about prescription drugs. “There are highly motivated and demanding patients who walk into a doctor’s office and push for particular medications,” Perry says. “Even if a doctor isn’t enthusiastic about having the person use the drug, he or she will often go ahead and write the prescription.” The issue is particularly tricky when people ask for drugs such as Viagra and Cialis that aren’t essential to life and well-being. “The question is: Are these essential medications or merely lifestyle enhancers?” Perry asks.



“It is questionable whether large populations of people will be able to afford prescription drugs if the prices keep climbing.”



    The answer is determined largely by which side of the examination table you’re sitting on. At the same time, other conditions, such as high cholesterol, are undertreated–often because physicians aren’t familiar with the pharmaceutical options available, Perry says. Some individuals believe that society should bear the cost of their treatment, regardless of price. Trying to find a way through this netherworld of health-care issues and prescription costs is nothing less than a Herculean task. Yet a growing wave of pharmacy-benefit managers such as Medco, Express Scripts and Caremark are trying by developing strategies that they believe will counteract the potent effects of today’s prescription-drug culture.


Dealing with the diagnosis
    Changing behavior starts with understanding motivations. When Medco surveyed consumers about their preferences for prescription medication, it found that 79 percent would use generic medications for minor conditions such as a cold or the flu, but that the figure dropped to 50 percent for serious conditions such as asthma. Interestingly, 57 percent of patients surveyed said they would be more likely to use a generic if they saw it advertised. Yet here is the catch-22: generics cost less in part because manufacturers spend almost no money advertising them.


    Medco also found that when presented with the same copay for using either a brand-name medication or a generic, 59 percent would choose the brand medication and 33 percent would choose the generic. Not surprisingly, as the cost of the copayment rose for the brand-name medication, consumers were more likely to choose a generic drug. “It is essential to design drug plans that take advantage of cost-saving opportunities,” says Glen Stettin, vice president of clinical products at Medco Health Solutions.


    That is easier said than done. Optimizing copayment schedules, deductibles and the use of generic medications presents formidable challenges. It requires PBMs and others in the industry to educate the public and doctors about key cost and performance issues. “In most cases, generic medications are just as good, if not better, than branded products,” he says. “It is possible for employers to design their plan with incentives for members and doctors to choose generic drugs.” At Express Scripts in St. Louis, a 48 percent increase in the use of generic prescriptions among its 50 million members helped keep the average cost of a prescription at $55.86 in 2003, up from $51.76 the year before. “Generic drugs are the key to managing the growing cost of prescription drugs and thus making it possible for plan sponsors to continue providing an attractive prescription benefit,” says Barrett Toan, chairman and CEO. An Express Scripts “Drug Trend Report” found that plan sponsors that introduced two or more trend-management tools in 2003 saw their drug costs decline by 4.6 percent. Those that introduced one or more tools for the first time in 2003 witnessed a 5.9 percent cost increase. Overall, plan sponsors that used at least one trend-management tool in 2003 saw their drug costs grow by 10.4 percent. Cost-containment strategies include promoting mail-order delivery, which can cut costs by 10 percent; placing a greater emphasis on over-the-counter drugs; developing more clearly defined coverage rules; and using patient medical and health-plan information to identify potential drug interactions–thus averting additional treatment.


Rx for managing costs
    Another area that some PBMs and employers are homing in on is overprescription or misprescription of certain drugs. Some observers say that the rate of increase in the use of some medications–such as those used to treat hyperactivity and ADHD in children–is cause for concern. “The risk we take is that we create an entire generation which believes that when in doubt, take a pill,” Stettin says.


    Some PBMs and employers are making it more difficult to obtain drugs such as Viagra and Propecia (which combats male-pattern baldness). In many cases, a request for a prescription for these medications automatically leads to a review. If the pharmacist, case specialist and prescribing physician agree on the need for the prescription, the PBM will approve its use. Otherwise, it is up to the patient to purchase the medication.


Workforce Management, August 2004, pp. 74-76 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on July 30, 2004June 29, 2023

Temps at the Top

L ast fall the largest poultry producer in the western United States found itself in dire need of technical expertise. Foster Farms, a 10,000-employee, privately held company headquartered in the small agricultural town of Livingston, California, had been plagued with technical problems while attempting for four years to convert its supply chain into an integrated $28 million SAP/ERP platform. Specialists contracted to implement the system charged the company $800,000 a month, and as the problems mounted month after month, so did the bills. But instead of hiring a consultant or initiating a search for a technically skilled, permanent CIO, Foster Farms chose a different model. It sought an experienced corporate leader with strong technical expertise and a flair for steering troubled companies back on course, a chief willing to come in-house, but only for as long as it took to get the job done. What Foster Farms wanted was an interim executive.



    In October, the company hired CIO Paul Lemerise, a seasoned executive who had served at the corporate level for more than 20 years at companies such as True Value Hardware and The Stride Rite Corp. before becoming a partner in Tatum Partners, a group of former CFOs and CIOs who hire themselves out as interim executives. Tatum has more than 400 partners nationwide. Lemerise stepped in as full-time interim CIO of the $1.5-billion-per-year poultry company and took charge of the technical team, reporting first to the chief financial officer and then directly to the CEO. By March, the entire supply chain had been converted without the loss of a single order. By May, he was interviewing candidates for his replacement. “The missing ingredients were leadership and direction,” says Lemerise of the situation at the company before he was hired. Once he took the helm, however, and specific objectives were laid out, “it was a huge challenge and a major turnaround, but we accomplished our objectives together,” he says. “It’s quite a success story.”


    While still considered a niche industry, interim-executive staffing is becoming increasingly common for companies seeking new tools to spur change and to achieve rapid results. Top-level interim executives can cost as much as $77,000 a month, but experts say the experience and ability that companies receive for the money not only can save them millions in the long run, but also can sometimes make the difference in a company’s surviving a crisis period intact. Staffing Industry Analysts Inc. reports that the interim-executive market is a $750 million industry, with some placement firms seeing as much as a 50 percent increase in the past year. But analysts do point out that the true market size is difficult to track, given the newness of the industry and the often informal nature of the recruiting.


    Called to duty for a variety of reasons, interim execs are usually hired to fix a critical problem or facilitate a major transition. Most have résumés stuffed with decades of corporate leadership experience and have turned to interim work for both the constant challenge and the more flexible lifestyle. And while their fees may be high–Foster Farms paid Tatum Partners $2,000 a day for Lemerise, and Korn/Ferry’s executive interims charge between $1,800 and $3,600 per day–interims are considered low-risk because they are by definition flexible and temporary. The average assignment is 6 to 18 months, and most interim execs work only one job at a time. Because companies can select people with the exact skills they are seeking for a specific amount of time, these highly experienced professionals are often an ideal, if temporary, solution.


    “More and more companies are beginning to understand what benefits these short-term assignments can bring to an organization,” says Michael Turrell, a former interim CIO in charge of Korn/Ferry International’s interim-executive practice. “They are the instant solution. Companies get very highly qualified and experienced individuals–many at the end of their working lives–who are happy to turn their hand to things they wouldn’t do as a permanent job because in many cases, they are overly qualified.”


The growing demand
    Tighter budgets have slowed hiring over the past few years, and a large number of executives have found themselves out on the street. Once there, many have realized that pounding the pavement isn’t fruitful. According to a survey by human resources consultants Drake Beam Morin, 18 percent of executives were in transition because of downsizing between 2001 and 2003, compared to 6.1 percent from 1997 to 2000. The survey also showed that the length of time needed to fill a new senior-level position had almost doubled in five years, escalating from seven months in 1998 to a year in 2003. From 2001 to 2003, the average length of time that top managers stayed at their jobs fell 30 percent, from 17 years to 12, the survey found, and 31 percent had been employed by their previous company for five years or less. A 2002 Forbes study of 800 top companies found that the average tenure for CEOs is just three years.



“My job satisfaction comes from seeing a job get done and finished and not from running things on a
day-to-day basis.”



    “As a culture, we’ve become increasingly impatient about getting results,” says Mark Nevins, president of Nevins Consulting, an executive coaching and consulting firm in New York. In the last generation, a typical executive worked for two or three companies during his career. Now, working for six or eight companies is the norm, and there’s no indication that the number will shrink. In today’s corporate culture, Nevins says, short-term results are valued above all else. And companies are more likely to show their expensive executives the door if those results aren’t achieved fast enough. Advocates of the interim-executive model say it helps companies to remain agile, enabling them to expand and contract their workforce and their expenses with the ebb and flow of the market.


    Phil Nasser, founder and president of Cerius Consulting, a network of interim executives based in Southern California whose clients have included Experian and Wells Fargo Bank, says that during the past four years, companies have been cautious about adding new blood to the payrolls. “It’s a tenuous time,” he says. “I think the down economy, along with all the outsourcing and jobs leaving the United States, has spooked executives. They are not willing to hire in the way they would have a few years ago.” But trimming high-level staff down to bare bones to conserve cash often robs a company of the exact expertise and experience it needs to weather difficult times. So more and more companies–usually when they are caught in a sticky situation–are turning to interim leadership for salvation because these guns for hire can deliver experience and knowledge virtually risk free.


   John Landis, Foster Farms’ corporate comp-troller, says that bringing an experienced person in-house temporarily rather than hiring a consultant was important to the company because it didn’t just want a strategic plan. It needed someone to create the plan and then implement it by managing a team, holding people accountable and ensuring that specific tasks were completed on schedule. “We needed someone whose goals were 100 percent in line with the organization’s,” Landis says. “Someone who was not being paid to consult but was being paid to manage.” An important component of the interim model was that Lemerise was also responsible for hiring his own replacement. After spending nine months at Foster Farms day in and day out, Lemerise had the company knowledge as well as the technical expertise and management experience to be uniquely positioned to select a permanent successor, Landis notes.


    Turrell says the largest demand for interim executives at Korn/Ferry, which has a roster of close to 3,000, is for CIOs, COOs, vice presidents of human resources and, more recently, CFOs. In the wake of Sarbanes-Oxley, companies have become more vigilant about corporate responsibility, and for some, Turrell says, that means employing CFOs from outside the company. Interim executives are valuable because they are tasked with becoming a part of the corporate team and also are independent agents who come in without a personal investment in the company other than a desire to be successful.


Worth the cost?
    Most interim executives are paid well for their services, but compensation can vary widely. Lemerise’s $2,000 daily rate at Foster Farms means an average of more than $40,000 a month. He says that as the placement com-pany, Tatum takes 25 percent of his earnings, leaving him with an income of $32,250 per month plus an incentive bonus arranged with the company. Top-level interim executives from Korn/Ferry can cost a company $3,600 a day. These interims bill client companies up to $77,400 a month, of which 30 percent is a “markup” charged by Korn/Ferry for finding and placing the executive, Turrell says. Staffing Industry Analysts recently reported that compensation for interim executives is determined by the size and complexity of the assignment, balanced with the person’s experience. The typical cost to a company is between $150 and $350 per hour, the report says.


    Despite the high per diem rate, price is seldom a factor in a company’s decision to hire a topflight temp, Turrell says. “These are serious assignments, usually of a crisis-driven nature. The costs are small compared to whatever problem he has to solve. Companies are just glad to get someone who can crack through and fix the problem.” Nevertheless, he says, interim execs can earn in six months what they would have in a year as a full-time employee in the same position. However, because the company is not paying for the interim’s benefits, vacation time, cars or any other perks, the actual cost to the company is not always as large as it might seem, he says.


    Salary.com, an online service that compiles employer-supplied data on compensation, reports that the average chief information officer in Los Angeles costs an employer $318,412 per year when salary, benefits and bonuses are factored in. This translates to $1,350 per actual day of work, assuming three weeks’ vacation and five holidays. It does not include a signing bonus, the possibility of sick leave, or a potential severance package should the employee not work out. At Foster Farms, Lemerise was paid $650 more than the average CIO salary each day, but Landis says the arrangement was well worth the money both in delivery and for peace of mind.


    “Yes, it was a huge expense,” Landis says, “but you never know what situation you would be comparing it with. Maybe we could have found someone with his qualifications [for a permanent position], but it would have taken a lot longer. Maybe we could have brought someone on who was of lower caliber and cheaper, but then how much more delayed would we have been?”


    Landis says that even if the company had attracted someone as qualified as Lemerise for a permanent position, it might have been a challenge to keep the person once the job shifted from fixing an immediate problem to maintaining a whole system. Recruitment group Spherion Corp. reports that the cost of losing and replacing a senior executive can be two to three times her salary. In contrast, Lemerise says that with an interim from Tatum Partners, “you pay nothing to have them walk through the door, and if it doesn’t work out, it doesn’t cost you another penny.”


    Despite the success stories, there can be drawbacks to the interim model. Temporary executives can be forced to spend valuable time at the outset of their appointments trying to gain trust and improve communication within and between departments. A lack of leadership continuity within the company can affect employee morale and productivity, particularly if there have been a lot of layoffs. Michael Harris, a professor of business at the University of Missouri, St. Louis, says that restructuring departments is often a central part of an interim chief’s job. “Usually, interims are brought in when a company needs to make a radical change, particularly when they’re going to be cutting a few heads off,” Harris says. “The [interim executive] is there for a short period, and he has to make some nasty decisions, but he doesn’t have to live too long with those decisions.”


    This difference in tenure can drive a wedge between permanent employees and the interim executive who is spearheading the drastic changes. It can be hard to impart a long-range vision when employees know that the executive will be there for only a short time. Even Landis, who says he is a satisfied customer and would hire an interim executive in the future, notes that the model is less than ideal. What could potentially have been better, he says, would have been to get someone with Lemerise’s skills who would stay at the company permanently.


Up for a challenge
    That could be an unlikely scenario because of the very characteristics that make interim chiefs so successful in the first place. A research report on the personality traits of top interim executives completed this year by Korn/Ferry International and Decision Dynamics, a behavioral research and management assessment firm, finds that most successful interim executives are motivated by a desire for personal growth through learning from successive assignments, whether to broaden their expertise or to increase its depth. They are independent-minded leaders, skilled communicators and natural entrepreneurs who value applying their skills to challenging and new situations.


    After 20 years as a CIO for various companies, Lemerise realized that what he enjoyed most about his career was launching new jobs. “Once everything was up and running and the problems were solved, it just didn’t thrill me in the same way, and I moved on,” he says. “My job satisfaction comes from seeing a job get done and finished and not from running things on a day-to-day basis.” Other interim execs say that in addition to the professional satisfaction derived from the work, the interim lifestyle agrees with them personally. Nasser says that as an interim employee, he has the same income as when he served as a vice president of sales at Atlanta-based Sage Software, but now he is no longer working 60 to 100 hours a week. As an interim executive, he is able to choose assignments and have more control of his time.


    But in addition to the love of a challenge and the requisite expertise for the job, a successful interim executive has to have exceptional interpersonal skills. Temporary execs become chameleonlike, Turrell says. They learn to adapt quickly to new dynamics with every company and corporate culture they enter. “Interims are very sociable individuals–gregarious and very consensus-oriented–because they very quickly have to win over the hearts and minds of the people there,” Turrell notes. “But they come under pressure very quickly, so they can also switch to an autocratic style. It’s this level of social skill, as well as their managerial expertise, that makes them so effective and worth their weight in gold.”


Workforce Management, August 2004, pp. 35-38 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on July 30, 2004June 29, 2023

United Technologies Offers a Model for Reporting Problems

George Wratney, former corporate ombudsman for United Technologies Corp. in Hartford, Connecticut, recalls an employee who referred to herself as Snow White to disguise her identity. She strongly suspected that her boss was stealing from the company. But since she was the only person in the department in a position to know about the theft, she was reluctant to come forward with a formal complaint. Her fear was that if an investigation were launched, other employees, including her boss, would know who had made the allegation and, if no charges against the boss were substantiated, she’d lose her job.



    When she contacted Wratney to discuss the situation, she called herself Snow White, and refused to provide specific information until Wratney could find a way to investigate the theft without identifying her. In his experience, Wratney says, the Snow White tale is not uncommon in corporate America. “A lot of issues in the workplace don’t come to management’s attention because people are afraid to come forward,” says Wratney, a consultant with Wratney Ombuds Concepts in Locust Grove, Virginia.


    That fear is exactly what UTC has been working to dispel since it implemented its Ombudsman/DIALOG project in 1986. The program is designed to provide a confidential way for UTC’s 203,000 employees, as well as suppliers and customers, to report problems or potential wrongdoing, to make suggestions, and to ask questions in person, over the telephone, in writing or online. These reports can include accusations of wrongdoing, potential ethics/code-of-conduct violations, safety problems, human resources issues and ideas for training programs. Everything about the company is fair game except issues that are covered under a collective-bargaining agreement.


    For publicly traded corporations working to comply with the whistle-blower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, UTC’s 18-year-old Ombudsman/DIALOG program provides a blueprint that shows how a program designed to meet an official need can evolve into an important avenue for employee communication. In general, Sarbanes-Oxley requires companies to have procedures in place to receive and deal with whistle-blower claims such as financial irregularity and accounting and securities fraud and to ensure that employees who make charges are protected.


    UTC’s Ombudsman/DIALOG program also was born out of scandal. In the mid-1980s, U.S. federal defense contractors were reeling from allegations of fraud and waste. To regain public and government trust, a group of defense contractors, including UTC, banded together and agreed to develop and enforce codes of ethics and standards of conduct for employees and to create feedback mechanisms to allow employees to report potential wrongdoing. In UTC’s case, the program initially was planned to be a simple toll-free hotline. However, it has expanded and evolved since then to become the Ombudsman/DIALOG program.


    The plan has worked so well that only very minor changes had to be made to ensure Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. The company simply added some language to the program’s written materials to notify employees that they can use the program to report problems and issues related to corporate accounting, internal accounting controls and auditing. However, the company carefully avoids the use of the word “whistle-blower” in connection with the program. “Whistle-blower has a negative connotation” because people who report illegal or unethical behavior often are ostracized by their peers or fired, says Patrick Gnazzo, UTC’s vice president of business practices and the executive who runs the Ombudsman/ DIALOG program.


How it works
    The Ombudsman/DIALOG program is overseen by Gnazzo and operated by his staff of four and nearly 200 program administrators with a budget of less than $1 million. Although the company does not calculate the financial return on the program’s costs, it does closely track the number of DIALOGs it receives and what changes, if any, have occurred as each one is resolved. Of the nearly 60,000 DIALOGs handled since the program’s inception, 41 percent resulted in some type of organizational change, 23 percent did not request or require any kind of change and 36 percent received a response from management saying either that the complaint was incorrect or that nothing could be done to rectify it.


    The program is structured to be solely a neutral information conduit. Neither ombudspersons nor program administrators get involved in investigating allegations or addressing any issue raised through the program. Instead, these people collect the necessary information and funnel it to the appropriate person within the company for further action while also ensuring that the person making the report receives a written response. For example, in Snow White’s case, Wratney did not set up the eventual investigation; he served as an intermediary between Snow White and a member of the company’s internal audit staff as the two worked to develop an investigative approach that was comfortable for Snow White.


    “The structure and confidentiality of the program are key,” Gnazzo says. “We can’t protect information if the person conducting the investigation gets the complaint directly from the individual. And no one in the company can demand information from the program.”


    UTC has gone to court six times to defend the confidentiality of Ombudsman/DIALOG program information, and has prevailed each time. The company has argued successfully that the program is merely a conduit for receiving information from employees and other interested parties. No one on the staff conducts investigations, so the records involved with the program are not admissible in court. “By using the Ombudsman/DIALOG program,” Gnazzo says, “the employee is confident that no one will know their name, so there is no excuse for not coming forward.”


    In some cases, an employee will ask a question or raise an issue that management thinks will be of interest to the wider employee population. In these situations, Gnazzo’s staff uses the program’s confidential reply mechanism to ask the person making the claim for permission to address the question or issue publicly. For example, when an employee asked for clarification about billing for travel expenses after hearing news reports that some companies were overcharging clients for those expenses, the company received permission from the employee to address the issue in the employee newspaper.


Responsiveness and accessibility
    Ensuring that employees receive a written response explaining the DIALOG’s resolution is an important element of the program, Gnazzo says. It shows that the employee’s issue was investigated and explains whether any change resulted. One of the first DIALOGs that UTC received after expanding the program into operations in China was from an employee in Shanghai who suggested that the company seek out alternative suppliers in different parts of the city to cut down on the amount of time employees wasted stuck in traffic. The employee received a response through the DIALOG Web site from the managing director of Shanghai operations stating that the company would be implementing that change.


    While most DIALOGs are handled by his staff, Gnazzo is involved in any reports of potential ethical violations or illegal activity. These might include issues such as the ethics of the company’s charitable contributions and allegations of fraud, bribery, extortion, kickbacks or conflicts of interest. These reports account for about 4 percent of all DIALOGs the company receives.


    Accessibility is also essential because UTC operates in 183 countries. The company has taken pains to make the program as user-friendly as possible by appointing program administrators at the operating-unit level throughout global operations. Program materials and the online interface are available in multiple languages, and translators are on call to facilitate program-related telephone calls. This allows individuals to create a DIALOG in their native language and to receive a response in that language. “This cannot be seen as an American program because then it won’t work,” Gnazzo says. As a result of these efforts, the percentage of DIALOGs coming from outside the company’s North American operations increased from 10 percent in 1995 to 29 percent last year.


    Taking the program online last year with a public Web site also has helped to boost participation. Since then, the overall number of DIALOGs has increased, and the company now receives 70 percent of U.S. DIALOGs online.


Workforce Management, August 2004, pp. 67-69 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on July 30, 2004July 10, 2018

Who’s Hiring from Business “Boot Camps”

Since their inception seven years ago, intensive summer “boot camps” for non-business majors held by prominent U.S. B-schools such as Dartmouth’s Tuck School of Business and NYU’s Stern School of Business have prepared students for corporate jobs with McKinsey, Fidelity, General Mills and UPS, among others. Here’s a quick rundown of some of these programs.




SchoolYear StartedDescriptionCostStudents in 2004Corporate-Sponsored StudentsCompanies that have hired program grads
Dartmouth Tuck School of Business
Bridge Program
1997Two four-week, full-time, noncredit sessions for sophomores and older$7,5000 includes tuition, books, room and board (scholarships available)26018 in 2004, 606 to dateAmerican Express, Bain Capital, Fidelity, General Mills, Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, Brandes Investment
NYU Stern School of Business Undergraduate College Stern Advantage Program2000One six-week, full-time, three-credit session for sophomores and older$8,450 includes tuition, books, and room37None so farBoston Capital, CIBC World Markets, Pfizer
Stanford Graduate School of Business
Summer Institute

 
2004One four-week, full-time, noncredit session for juniors and older$8,000 includes tuition, books, room and board55None so farNot available
UC Berkeley Haas School of Business
Business for Arts, Sciences and Engineering Program
1998One six-week, full-time, for-credit session for sophomores and older$5,175 includes tuition, books; optional room and board $1,655 to $2,160 extra43None so farDHL, General Electric, KPMG, McKinsey, Ogilvy & Mather, Price Waterhouse, UPS

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress