Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on March 1, 2004June 29, 2023

Despite Painful Cutbacks, These Companies Still Have Recruiting Power

The economy was just beginning to sour in 2000 when Synygy Inc. saw the writing on the wall. The suburban Philadelphia company was used to explosive growth–80 percent on average annually since its founding in 1991. But Synygy’s clients were cutting back, and management realized it had better prepare for slower growth.



    Sure enough, demand for Synygy’s performance-management software and services dropped off, and growth slowed to 50 percent, then 30 percent. Ed Steinberg, vice president of human resources for the company, says the solution was pretty straightforward: either increase revenue or decrease expenses. The company decided to ask its employees for help in cutting expenses.


    “There is a good way to cut costs and a not-so-good way,” says Steinberg. “The benefit that comes with listening to their ideas is that the process becomes a partnership. They could see the situation. We were sharing all our information with them.”


    Synygy, like many other companies negatively affected by the economy, knows that to thrive and grow in the good times, it must preserve its human capital in the bad times. If cost-cutting and containment is handled in a way that doesn’t disenfranchise employees, doesn’t leave them feeling unappreciated and resentful, it can be used to help with retention and recruiting in the upturn. Goodwill and loyalty aren’t easy to quantify, but their existence in a workforce can change an employer’s image in the eyes of both employees and customers from cold-hearted to compassionate.



    Michael Harris is a professor of management in the college of business administration at the University of Missouri-St. Louis. He says being candid with employees the way Synygy has is vital to a company’s success because when the promised upturn arrives, the last thing managers want is to see embittered employees jumping ship or to have trouble recruiting new talent.


    “Public relations and communication internally is more important now than it ever was,” Harris says. “The tendency for managers in tough times is to hide information, but now I see them communicating with employees instead.”


    Fred Crandall is co-author of The Headcount Solution: How to Cut Compensation Costs and Keep Your Best People. “During this downturn,” he says, “the best companies took a look at their future focus. They didn’t just lay people off, but asked, ‘How can we get through this and keep the people we need to build the company in the future?’ ”


   Studies conducted in 2001 and 2002 by WorldatWork show that U.S. companies are increasingly looking to cut or contain costs in ways other than layoffs. In the 2002 survey, 58 percent of respondents had reduced or suspended annual pay increases or were considering doing so; 46 percent were considering reducing or suspending bonuses or incentive pay or had already done so. Other cost-cutting measures included voluntary severance and early-retirement packages. In the 2002 survey, the use of alternatives to layoffs, such as hiring freezes, job sharing and contracting arrangements, had increased from the 2001 survey.


Tapes worth thousands
    Layoffs weren’t necessary at Synygy, which launched its cost-savings idea competition at a quarterly company meeting and then reinforced it through the intranet. Steinberg says that Synygy’s employees, who tend to be entrepreneurial anyway, were energized by the opportunity, and that the response was “outstanding.” Management got about 200 suggestions, and the person whose idea had the biggest financial impact received a cash reward of $500. Steinberg also tied the submission of ideas into the company’s existing rewards program, normally used for employee referrals. Employees earned points for their ideas, which could then be used to purchase items in the Synygy store.


    Other than having to increase inventory in the store, the program cost virtually nothing, except for the time expended by employees to think of ideas. The winning idea suggested that Synygy recycle the tapes it uses to store information. Each day the company backs up its server and stores the information on tapes, thousands of them, which are kept for years. Now it saves only three months’ worth of backup and reuses the rest of the tapes. “It saved us literally thousands of dollars,” says Steinberg. Another suggestion the company implemented was to combine multiple daily FedExes to other office locations into a once-daily or once-weekly mailing. That saved hundreds of dollars, he says.


    Although annual growth at Synygy is at 25 to 30 percent, down significantly from what it was three years ago, it’s still impressive. And employees, who know they had a hand in keeping a lid on things, have said in anonymous quarterly surveys that they are pleased to be part of the process.


Six months of pain
    The downturn also took its toll on Healthwise, a Boise, Idaho-based nonprofit organization that publishes consumer health information. The company’s 110 employees are motivated by a common mission: helping people care for themselves and their families. The atmosphere at Healthwise is collegial and relaxed; every office has a window, and the culture is one of openness. So when the company realized it would have to lay off about 10 percent of its workforce after the triple terrorist attacks on the United States, it was honest with its employees. “Still, our employee-satisfaction survey results immediately following the layoffs took a big hit,” says Donald Kemper, chairman and CEO.


    The day after layoffs were announced, Kemper held a staff meeting and told employees that pay cuts would also be needed. Hourlies received no pay cut; exempt employees took a 5 to 10 percent cut and executives a 10 to 20 percent cut. The salary reductions saved the company about $250,000 and the layoffs another $537,000 per year, about 7.5 percent of total revenue.


    After six months, it was clear that Healthwise had fared far better than expected, and Kemper pushed to have employees’ pay restored to pre-reduction levels. It also paid back the money it had held back during those six months. “It was a tough sell to the board,” he says, “but I really felt it was the right thing to do. It was immensely well received, and brought us an enormous amount of goodwill and loyalty. I think it has created a sense of trust that we will do the right thing by employees, and that is how we want to be known.”


$50,000 well spent
    Rising health-care costs was the major problem for Flight Options, which sells aircraft on a fractional basis, giving companies access to a fleet of jets on four hours’ notice. In the midst of the downturn in 2002, the Cleveland company merged with a division of Raytheon Travel Air. This made Flight Options the second-largest fractional jet provider in the industry and doubled its size overnight.


    After the merger, Raytheon’s employees went from having a health-benefits plan powered by the buying clout of 33,000 employees to one that would have to meet the needs of a company with 1,400 employees. Bob Sullivan, Flight Options’ director of human resources, says the price of benefits was simply better with 33,000 than it was with 1,400, so the company could not afford the package Raytheon had in place. Sullivan was concerned that Raytheon’s employees would become resentful of the changes and that when economic conditions improved, they’d quit.


    Sullivan conducted an anonymous opinion survey, giving employees a hypothetical open checkbook and asking them to design any benefits package they wanted. He learned that they wanted affordable health insurance, as well as dental insurance and additional vacation benefits. The big message, however, was a desire for work/life balance.


    Flight Options began offering flextime for tenured employees, on-site dry cleaning, tuition reimbursement, a preferred new-car purchase rate at Ford, gift certificates for expectant mothers and on-site banking. During peak travel times, when employees routinely work 10-hour days, they receive free gourmet meals, snacks throughout the day and chair massages. Employees loved the perks. “Feedback was phenomenal,” says Sullivan.


    On average, the investment for the new benefits, as well as a monthly picnic to welcome new employees, was about $50,000 annually. “It’s a very small investment compared to our revenue,” says Sullivan, who declined to give specifics but said Flight Options had record sales in 2003. Net sales for Raytheon in the third quarter of 2003 were $4.4 billion, up from $4.1 billion in third-quarter 2002. Third-quarter results include $141 million in sales from Flight Options.


    The company managed to establish a benefits package for far less than it had anticipated–spending $900,000 less than budgeted–and used the difference to significantly reduce the amount each employee has to pay for benefits. That $900,000 could have been put back in the company’s coffers rather than being used to help employees. Flight Options has now rebranded itself as “the preferred employer,” largely because of its benefits. “We want to be the employer of choice in this industry,” says Sullivan. “By rewarding our employees this way, we hope to attract and retain the best people.”


Re-recruiting at Accenture
    Sabbaticals were the elixir for Accenture. In 2001, it faced a decrease in client demand and had more employees than it needed. To keep layoffs minimal, the consulting company created FlexLeave, a voluntary sabbatical program of 6 to 12 months. Employees were paid 20 percent of their salaries and kept all their health benefits, as well as their laptops and e-mail. They were still employees of Accenture, but were able to do whatever they wanted.


    Keith Hicks is Accenture’s director of human resources for the United States. “It wound up being a fantastic thing for Accenture’s business and our people,” he says. “It has had an enormous positive impact on our community and the global community. We had people teaching at schools for underprivileged kids, teaching English to students in China, doing all kinds of volunteer work.”


    Two thousand employees in the United States took advantage of the program, which ran for about 18 months, until the end of 2002. Hicks, who is based in Atlanta, says that even those who didn’t participate in FlexLeave wrote to him and said they were proud of the company for creating it. For those who did take part, the outpouring of loyalty and gratitude toward Accenture was, he says, unbelievable. “The loyalty factor increased exponentially; they couldn’t believe that their employer would give them such an opportunity. I spoke to many who went out on FlexLeave, came back and said they felt re-energized, as if they had been re-recruited.”


    Accenture saved 80 percent of the payroll costs for the 2,000 employees who took the sabbaticals, but did eventually do layoffs. The company wouldn’t provide many details on the layoffs, but it was reported in August 2001 that Accenture had laid off 600 support staff. In 2003, the company, which has 25,000 U.S. employees, created the Accenture At Home program, which gives certain segments of its workforce the option of working from home three or more days a week. It’s just been rolled out in Atlanta, but will soon hit all other U.S. cities where Accenture operates.


    Branding itself as an employer that recognizes the need for work/life balance and gives employees flexibility has helped the company retain the highly skilled talent it relies on–and that isn’t easy to find. “Everyone feared when things started to improve that we’d have a mass exodus, but we’re not seeing that,” says Hicks. “Business is picking up in our industry, but we’re not seeing the exodus, and I think the loyalty we gained is paying off.”


Flexibility “will keep them here”
    Sun Microsystems has frozen raises and hasn’t given bonuses in two years, but it’s banking on a program called iWork to give employees some much-sought-after flexibility. With iWork, employees can access Sun’s server from anywhere using a device called a Sun Ray, a laptop computer that costs about $400 and has no hard drive. Right now, about 65 iWork employees have a Sun Ray at home, part of Sun’s pilot SunRay@Home program, and the company plans to expand that to between 300 and 400 users by the end of March 2004. However, 27,000 of these computers have also been deployed at Sun’s campuses globally, including iWork flex offices, iWork drop-in centers, iWork Cafés and iWork kiosks. Employees use a Java card encoded with their identification information to connect to the company server via the Sun Ray computer.


    iWorkers at home without a Sun Ray can plug into the company remotely via their traditional laptop or a PDA device and access most of their files, although it’s not as secure as using the Java card and Sun Ray. Either way, the office comes to the employee. “It’s about being remote, about being mobile. It’s a cost-containment strategy,” says Ann Bamesberger, director of the iWork Solutions Group. “We don’t have to pay for that 1950s office you aren’t working in anymore because you’re in transit, at meetings with customers or at home.”


    Of Sun’s 35,000 employees, 14,000 take advantage of iWork. Rather than rebranding itself, Sun is enhancing its brand. Flexibility is one thing it offers customers, Bamesberger says, and an important part of doing that is offering iWork to employees.


    “All of us in this industry are facing the same freezes, and people in other companies are biding their time until they can leave,” she says. “We think the benefits of iWork, giving employees the life balance they don’t have in a traditional work environment, will keep them here.” Employee surveys done over the last two years show satisfaction rates at between 75 and 80 percent. Sun’s total cost avoidance in 2003, the money it didn’t spend building traditional offices or investing in real estate, was $65 million. Electricity savings alone–Sun Rays require just 11 watts of power to run, whereas most lightbulbs are between 60 and 100 watts–is over $2 million.


    Those savings are needed. Sun lost $125 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2004. Net revenue is down $6.8 million from what it was in 2001. Although the company’s stock has rallied since the start of 2004–largely on the strength of its partnership with chip maker Advanced Micro Devices–Sun faces an uphill battle as it tries to grow revenue and reach profitability.


    Linda Crowe, group manager of the enterprise systems product group, is an iWork employee. She’s been at Sun for eight years and has been working remotely for 18 months, which she has found liberating. “I have to say, if I were to be offered a position that required an hour commuting a day, that would be hard to consider,” she says. “I’m used to this flexibility.”

Posted on March 1, 2004July 10, 2018

Tycos Guide to Ethical Conduct

Thisdocument from Tyco covers appropriate and inappropriate actions related to:


  • Equal employment

  • Harassment

  • Substance abuse

  • Health and safety

  • Political involvement

  • Gifts

  • Fraud

  • Anti-trust issues

  • Confidential information and insider trading

  • The media

  • E-mail and the Internet

  • Recordkeeping

  • Telecommunications issues

Posted on March 1, 2004June 29, 2023

Workforce Management March 2004

Clean Slate
By Andy Meisler
Human resources was asleep at the switch when greed and fraud torpedoed Tyco. Laurie Siegel, the company’s post-scandal senior vice-president of human resources, is in charge of making up for lost trust. She has taken on the daunting task with eyes wide open.

2004 Optimas Awards
The 14th annual Optimas Awards honor excellence in workforce management. This year’s winners brought innovation, discipline and vision to their organizations during a particularly difficult economic period.

The winners are:
    Competitive Advantage: Cendant Mobility
    Financial Impact: Alegent Health
    Ethical Practice: Lockheed Martin Corp.
    Global Outlook: Mattel, Inc.
    Innovation: Baptist Health South Florida
    Managing Change: Union Pacific Corp.
    Partnership: The Global Workplace Collaboration
    Service: Wachovia Corp.
    Vision: Monical Pizza Corp.
    General Excellence: General Motors Corp.


More care, less cost
By Maryann  Hammers
Today, more than 30 medical conditions are covered in disease management programs. The approach is changing from focusing on a few costly chronic illnesses to considering treatment of the whole person, with all the challenges and conditions that might be part of her life. “Programs are morphing from ‘disease management’ to ‘population health,’ ” on consultant says. Some programs provide users with a “health-care coach” or a “care concierge,” who serves as a focal point for many kinds of health and illness-prevention services. And get ready for significant savings. One study argues that the ROI for a set of disease-management programs can be more than 4 to 1.

Between the Lines
A strategic fallacy
The question is always are you strategic or tactical? It’s the wrong question.
  Reactions From Readers
Wal-Mart’s exec VP for people disliked a story on the company..

In This Corner
Plain and simple: liars lose
Little white lies employers tell to soften the blow of firing someone can backfire in a costly way.

Legal Briefings
No protection for anti-gay postings. “At hone” accommodation is unreasonable.


Data Bank
Carrying the benefits burden.

Software titans play hardball
This could prove to be a pivotal month in the Oracle vs. Peoplesoft battle. Also: Getting white-collar clients ready for their trip to Club Fed. Women at the top improve the bottom line. The HRMS hot list.
 
 

Recruitment
Finding schools that yield good job applicant ROI
Some companies are narrowing their recruiting efforts to just those few campuses that provide the best job candidates. And once they have some good schools in their sites, companies try to develop closer ties in order to identify the most talented students as early as their sophomore year..
 

Benefits
In Enron’s wake, time for a review of nonqualified plans
Even though the plans get a bad rap in the press, it’s still a good idea to review these plans and remove “anomalies.”
 

Disability Management
Social Security’s new deal for disability
The agency’s troubled programs are undergoing a major overhaul. Employers could enjoy lower costs, and disabled workers could be more motivated to go back to work without risking the loss of medical coverage.
 

Recruiting & /Staffing
Internal mobility systems work for all
Companies are giving their internal-mobility programs a boost in an effort to retain and groom top talent. As the economy starts to improve, managers are worried that a stronger job market could prompt employees to jump ship.
 

Recruitment
The hunt for candidates with security clearances
Demand for candidates who have Defense Department security clearances outstrips supply. Even with employee referrals, businesses can’t always fill critical jobs.
 

 
February  2004

January  2003

December  2003
If you’re not currently receiving Workforce Management magazine, click here to request a FREE trial issue today!

 

Posted on March 1, 2004July 10, 2018

More Workforce Measurements on the Way

Seventy-six percent of workforce management executives say that senior management in their companies will increase their support for “people metric projects” over the next three years, according to a Conference Board study sponsored by PeopleSoft. Only 1 percent expect a decrease.
 
Numerous companies are interested in workforce management metrics, according to The Conference Board. IBM is examining if its $1 billion learning investment was worth it. AT&T is investigating the effect of employee turnover. The Royal Bank of Scotland Group is establishing the link between employee engagement and customer service. Cisco–considered one of the more progressive companies in the workforce management field–is developing “human capital dashboards” to analyze revenue per employee and other data. American Express, also much admired for its workforce management practices, is refining the formulas it uses to reward business leaders for high employee-satisfaction rates.

Posted on March 1, 2004July 10, 2018

Health Care Fight in Iowa

Right now, the 1,300 employees of the City of Des Moines pay nothing for health insurance, according to the Des Moines Register. This arrangement may not last long..
 
The City Council has asked the city manager, city attorney, city clerk and human-rights director to pay 1 to 4.3 percent of their salaries for health insurance. Some union leaders are concerned that when contracts get renegotiated over the coming years, the other 1,300 city employees in Des Moines will also have to pay part of their health care costs.
 
Unions say that asking their members to pay more for insurance amounts to a pay cut. In contrast, when City Manager Eric Anderson starts paying part of his health-insurance costs, he’ll also be getting a salary increase and three weeks of extra vacation time, in addition to the five weeks he currently receives.

Posted on March 1, 2004July 10, 2018

A Sample Leadership Strategy

Sample Leadership Strategy
ABC Utility

Critical Competencies

    We’ve identified the following five competencies as most important for our executives, given our business strategy and our change environment.
  • Grows the business
  • Drives change
  • Builds commitment
  • Maximizes talent quality
  • Focuses on the customer
  • Sourcing Leaders

Sourcing Leaders

  • Make/buy mix. We will balance the ratio of internal hires/external hires in leadership at 70/30 to encourage new ideas and challenge our culture while providing opportunities for internal development.

  • Succession planning. Our succession-planning process will be the exclusive method for placing leaders into jobs. We will identify candidates and match them with opportunities based on this process, using the competencies as a primary screen.

  • Onboarding leaders. Retention and success of leaders in new roles (from inside or outside the company) will be increased through a process that provides guidance and coaching around both personal performance and relationship building.

Aligning Leaders
  • Performance management. We will set aggressive goals for all leaders in our performance-management process, ensuring that stretch goals are a key component and that a balanced measurement of business performance and individual behaviors occurs.

  • Engaging leaders. Executive engagement will be actively monitored through yearly surveys with human resources and the executive team, held jointly accountable for identifying and improving deficiencies.

  • Executive coaching. Providing select executives with coaching to further performance will be a core aspect of our strategy.

Developing Leaders
  • Assignment-based development. Job assignments will be the primary method for developing leaders, and a process to match individuals and jobs will flow from succession planning. Support of internal coaches will be provided to leaders in developmental assignments to help ensure success.

  • High-potential development. Our highest-potential employees will receive a disproportionate share of developmental resources. We will develop group activities for them, increase their exposure to the senior team and board, and review their performance on a semi-annual basis.

  • Executive development. We will provide group-based sessions for our leaders to develop capabilities in serving customers and communicating a clear vision and business acumen.

Rewarding Leaders
  • Base pay. We will set the 50th percentile as the goal for base pay, with high-potential employees identified through our succession process being paid at the 60th percentile.

  • Annual incentive. We will provide a 75th percentile target for annual incentives, strongly differentiating between median performers and high performers in distributing rewards.

  • Long-term incentives. We will use a combination of performance-vesting stock and regular stock options to provide incentives for consistent leader behavior. We will target the 75th percentile for these awards, strongly differentiating between median performers and high performers.

SOURCE: Reprinted with permission. From Leading the Way, by Robert Gandossy & Marc Effron, copyright 2004 by Hewitt Associates, published by John Wiley & Sons.

Posted on March 1, 2004July 10, 2018

How Bank of America Defines Success

Below is Bank of America’s leadership competencies. Under each of the five competencies is a list of behaviors associated with the competency.



    I. Grow the Business


    II. Lead People to Perform


    III. Drive Execution


    IV. Sustain Intensity and Optimism


    V. Live Our Values

GROW THE BUSINESS
    A. Demonstrates deep and broad business acumen

1. Demonstrates deep/broad financial management and functional skills


2. Demonstrates a business perspective that is much broader than one function or unit


3. Cuts to the heart of complex business and financial issues

    B. Creates competitive and innovative business plans

4. Creates competitive, innovative business plans that drive short- and long-term growth.


5. Challenges the status quo to grow the business


6. Focuses on growth opportunities and capital efficient investments


7. Reinvents the business

    C. Builds customer/client-driven environment

8. Ensures the customer/client perspective is at forefront of all business decisions and initiatives


9. Invests time in customer/client-facing activities to understand their needs


10. Instills customer/client focus in all associates

    D. Institutionalizes error-free quality processes

11. Champions and leverages six sigma tools to drive revenue, reduce costs and add value


12. Holds all associates accountable for continuously improving processes

    E. Excels at risk/reward trade-off

13. Thoroughly analyzes opportunities issues and then takes appropriate risks


14. Takes action to mitigate and minimize liabilities, while ensuring maximum returns

LEAD PEOPLE TO PERFORM
    F. Aligns enterprise capabilities

15. Transcends silos to achieve greater enterprise results


16. Drives collaboration among individuals and groups


17. Leverages teams to drive performance

    G. Recruits and grows great talent

18. Acts as a champion for diversity, creating an environment that values diverse backgrounds and perspectives


19. Is superb at selecting ‘‘A’’ players


20. Moves quickly to address mediocre/poor performers


21. Willingly takes risks on high potentials/high performers to stretch and develop them

    H. Inspires commitment and follower ship

22. Paints a compelling picture of the future and connects it to individual associates


23. Creates positive energy in the face of challenges


24. Inspires others to follow his/her lead

    I. Communicates crisply and candidly

25. Balances talking and listening to foster candid dialogue


26. Crisply gets his/her point across


27. Commands attention across multiple audiences

DRIVE EXECUTION
    J. Instills management focus and discipline

28. Implements practices and processes that drive accountability


29. Translates strategies into specific goals, tactics, action plans and deliverables


30. Keeps people focused

    K. Builds partnerships to achieve swift adoption

31. Builds broad-based business relationships across the organization


32. Skillfully influences peers and colleagues to promote and sell ideas


33. Brings to surface and resolves conflict with minimal noise

    L. Demonstrates sound judgment and acts with speed

34. Balances data, logic, and intuition in decision making


35. Deals effectively with concrete, tangible issues as well as abstract, conceptual matters


36. Makes timely decisions


37. Generates pragmatic, sensible and simple solutions to complex problems


38. Moves quickly to eliminate roadblocks

SUSTAIN INTENSITY AND OPTIMISM
    M. Constantly raises the bar

39. Sets ‘‘stretch’’ performance standards for self and others


40. Creates the optimal tension for peak performance


41. Demonstrates low tolerance for mediocrity


42. Fosters high levels of accountability through fair, but hard-hitting performance management processes

    N. Displays personal courage

43. Takes a stand on controversial and unpopular issues


44. Makes tough business and people decisions

    O. Continuously learns and adapts

45. Is insightful about personal mistakes and failures: learns from them and moves on


46. Is a voracious learner

LIVE OUR VALUES

47. Lives our company’s values


48. Puts the interest of the bank ahead of his/her own agenda

SOURCE: Adapted from Growing Your Company’s Leaders: How Great Organizations Use Succession Management to Sustain Competitive Advantage. Copyright © 2004 Robert M. Fulmer and Jay A. Conger. Published by AMACOM Books, a division of American Management Association, New York, NY. Used with permission. All rights reserved.

Posted on March 1, 2004June 29, 2023

Many People, One Mattel

Mattel may be the brains behind such long-standing favorites as Barbie, Hot Wheels and Elmo dolls, but when Robert Eckert was hired as CEO in May 2000, the world’s largest toy maker was losing at its own game. Former CEO Jill Barad’s growth-by-acquisition strategy had flopped, driving the company’s stock price to $11.25 per share. Since Eckert took charge, Mattel’s stock price has risen 71 percent, to $19.27 per share, and earnings have grown by almost 70 percent, from $328.5 million in 2000 to $552.6 million in 2003.



    For Eckert, the key to reviving the company has been the energy and resources he has committed to people management. It is Mattel’s success at turning management around with a global strategy to develop employees that makes it the 2004 Optimas Award winner for Global Outlook. The toy maker has 25,000 employees in 36 countries and sells its products in 150 nations. Therefore, its turnaround strategy had to be global, says David Lewin, a human resources professor at UCLA’s Anderson School. Revitalizing a global company is especially challenging when dealing with foreign companies because there are so many more unknowns, such as different subsidies, tax regulations and government policies, Lewin says. Mattel also was willing to dump its unprofitable businesses and concentrate on investing in its people. “Motivating your workforce to accomplish that turnaround is a very tall order whenever you shake up a company,” he says.


    Mattel has launched a set of leadership and professional-development programs for the entire company at the Conference Leadership Center at its headquarters in El Segundo, California. The programs extend to facilities throughout the world, with an e-learning system that includes 150 training programs. Among the key programs is a three-day session for new supervisors that focuses on skills that managers need to address on day-to-day issues. A one and a half day advanced leadership program for senior vice presidents, vice presidents and directors teaches executives how to better manage and develop their staffs, with an emphasis on how to discuss performance with employees. Twice a year, Mattel and Thunderbird, the American Graduate School of International Management, hold a weeklong leadership program on global business growth for 35 directors and officers from around the world. One of the newest programs is an executive seminar for Mattel’s senior management led by Eckert and also taught by professors from the London Business School and the University of Southern California. Eckert selects topics that reflect the most critical strategic issues facing the company.


    The global leadership programs have increased the knowledge and skills of management worldwide, and now “global management is more closely aligned with the corporate strategies and goals,” says Grace MacArthur, vice president of leadership development, who spearheaded the design of the programs. “This, in turn, produces innovative and creative products, reduces costs and improves employee satisfaction.” Now employees are becoming “one Mattel company,” rather than a number of companies operating separately, she says.


    Beyond leadership development, in 2001 the company initiated its first performance-management system and succession-management process. “Developing people is much more than just classroom training,” MacArthur says.


    The company’s own managers believe that the changes are making a difference. A company-wide employee survey last year showed a 35 percent increase in the number of directors and executives who believed that Mattel was doing a good job of providing training, succession management and career opportunities, compared to a survey two years earlier. And since 1999, the value of the company has increased by approximately $5 billion. “We needed a more disciplined approach to running the business,” MacArthur says. “If you can convert the hearts and minds of your leaders, you begin to change the culture of your company.”


Workforce Management, March 2004, pp. 42-44 — Subscribe Now!

Posted on March 1, 2004June 29, 2023

Diversity Aside, Does it Pay to Search for Gays

When Ohio legislators passed an anti-gay-marriage law in February that also barred state agencies from providing benefits to same-sex partners, it wasn’t only gay activists who protested. Some of the most insistent opposition to the bill came from companies such as Nationwide Insurance and Limited Brands, Inc., which operates The Limited, Victoria’s Secret and Bath & Body Works stores. The employers weren’t motivated so much by the conviction that gays deserved equal rights as by a more pragmatic concern. They worried that the negative ambience fostered by the law might hinder their recruiting of gay talent.



    Take, for example, NCR Corp., the old-line Ohio company that made the first mechanical cash register in the 1880s, and has since grown into a global supplier of computer technology to food warehouses and retail stores. “We’re based in Dayton, but we’re competing in a global marketplace, not just for sales but also in hiring and retaining employees,” says NCR spokesman John Hourigan. “Because of that, we see workplace diversity as an imperative.”


    Hourigan, who is careful to use the politically correct term “GLBT”–short for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender–touts NCR’s efforts to create a workplace that’s attractive to gay job candidates. Not only does the company offer benefits for same-sex partners and an anti-discrimination policy, but it also has a company-sanctioned “resource group” of gay employees who are encouraged to communicate any concerns directly to management.


    To make sure that potential job applicants get the message that the company is gay-friendly, its Web site touts the 2003 “Outie” award that NCR received from Out & Equal Workplace Advocates, an activist group, and the company’s second-straight perfect 100 rating for equality from the Human Rights Campaign, a gay organization in Washington, D.C. NCR has even sponsored a gay-pride parade in Dayton to increase its visibility in the gay community.


Profits and performance
   
NCR’s efforts are just one sign of a subtle but growing trend in the business world. Companies are making a deliberate effort to market themselves to potential hires as gay-friendly. In some cases, they’re actively recruiting gay and lesbian talent–by advertising in gay publications, participating in job fairs run by gay professional and student groups, and utilizing job-search engines at Web sites such as Gay.com and GayWork.com.


    Some turn to a Los Angeles-based recruiting firm, McCormack and Associates, whose strong links to the gay community are its calling card. Companies aren’t necessarily investing huge amounts of money in such efforts–running a corporate visibility ad on the popular Web site GayWork.com, for example, may cost as little as $6,000 a year–but analysts say the eventual return on investment may be substantial. That’s because companies see gay employees as a particularly valuable resource for tapping into the gay consumer market, which numbers more than 14 million consumers and is projected to wield more than $607 billion in purchasing power by 2007, according to MarketResearch.com, in Rockville, Maryland.


    It’s not that companies are simply out to hire more gay workers. Rather, they don’t want to lose out on desirable job candidates who happen to also be gay, says Daryl Herrschaft, director of the Human Rights Campaign’s WorkNet program on gay workplace issues. “Companies don’t really care about sexual orientation. They care about profits and performance. But they know that GLBT people do care about companies’ policies. If a company has partner benefits, for example, they tend to see it as an indication of how friendly the workplace is going to be toward them.”


    Since by the most generous estimates only 10 percent of the population is gay, it’s likely that gays amount to a similarly small fraction of the nation’s workforce. However, that fraction may contain a disproportionately high number of desirable job candidates, since research suggests that gays tend to be better educated and more successful professionally than the population as a whole. A 1996 study by Simmons Market Research Bureau found that 48 percent of gays had college degrees and 22 percent possessed advanced degrees, more than three times the proportion in the overall U.S. population. Seventy percent worked in professional and managerial jobs. Moreover, the gay population tends to gravitate toward major urban centers, so it’s more likely that a job applicant in New York or Chicago or Los Angeles will turn out to be gay. When Richard Florida, a Carnegie Mellon University professor and visiting scholar at the Brookings Institution, amassed a list in the late 1990s of cities with the hottest high-tech sectors, he noticed that the list closely matched one that a CMU graduate student had compiled of places with the highest concentration of gays.


    Popular recruiting wisdom holds that gays are concentrated in certain well-compensated, high-status fields such as investment banking, law and management. “You get to dress well and eat well in those professions,” jokes recruiting consultant Joseph McCormack. “That’s a lot more fun than, say, working on software all night and eating from vending machines.” Nevertheless, research by Louis Thomas, an associate professor of management at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, suggests that gay workers are distributed evenly across economic sectors. Thomas has found that 13.4 percent of gays work in education–one reason why Ohio State University president Karen A. Holbrook appealed to Ohio Gov. Bob Taft not to sign the anti-gay-marriage bill. Another 7.3 percent work in health care, 7.1 percent in business consulting, 6.4 percent in government positions, 4.7 percent in manufacturing, 4.6 percent in insurance and legal work, and 4.2 percent in finance and accounting.


    Corporate recruiters, however, are still grappling with finding the best approach to reaching a group whose members don’t all necessarily want to be singled out. “A generation ago, being out of the closet was still anathema at a lot of companies,” McCormack says. “Gay workers basically were looking for a place where they would be left alone, without harassment.” While concern about privacy is still felt by many gays, the latest generation entering the job market also contains many individuals who’ve been out since high school and are less reticent about their orientation. It’s not uncommon, recruiters say, for job applicants to ask about a company’s partner benefits or nondiscrimination policies.


“Brand loyal”
   
Nevertheless, those who have studied gay employment issues say that a company’s reputation for tolerance remains of crucial importance to applicants. Wharton’s Thomas says his research indicates that gay employees are likely to stay with an employer with gay-friendly policies, even if offered more money by a competitor. “GLBTs tend to be brand loyal,” says HRC’s Herrschaft. “They make purchasing decisions based on their perception of a company’s attitudes. It’s the same thing with jobs.”


    That makes it imperative for corporate recruiters to market their company as a gay-friendly brand. Participating in gay job fairs and conferences is one route. In April, two dozen companies–including such big names as Ford Motor Co., Sun Microsystems, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley–will be participating in Reaching Out MBA, a recruiting and networking conference put on by gay students at the University of Southern California and the University of California at Los Angeles graduate business schools. Another possibility is the assortment of gay-oriented Web sites such as GayWork.com in Santa Monica, California, which maintains profiles of nearly 20,000 job-seekers. More than 1,100 companies, including Microsoft and Capital One Financial Corp., the McLean, Virginia-based credit card giant, have posted company profiles on the site. “It’s a way for a company to let everyone know that it’s making the outreach, that it wants to be a comfortable place,” says the site’s founder, media consultant Matthew Skallerud.


Creating a buzz
   
Some companies have found, however, that the most effective way to reach gay talent is through employee referrals and contacts. NCR, for example, has received tips on possible hires from employees who participate in its GLBT resource group, a company-sanctioned internal organization that advises management on gay workplace issues. About half the companies in the Fortune 500 have established such groups, according to Out & Equal executive director Selisse Berry.


    IBM, widely regarded as one of the most effective recruiters of gay talent, has gone a step further, using its gay resource group as an asset in both recruiting and marketing its products. Spokesman Jim Sinocchi says IBM sees both types of outreach as synergistically serving the same strategic goal–that is, marketing IBM wares and services to a gay market segment with an estimated $500 billion in purchasing power. “The nature of the gay community is strong networks, based on personal contacts, that extend through peer companies and customers,” he says. “What we’re trying to do is create a buzz, to make people want to spend their money with IBM–or to work here.”


    IBM relies on its group of gay employees not just for referrals, but also to spread the word about the company’s policies and workplace culture. IBM has 600 employees receiving partner benefits, as well as 25 openly gay executives in key positions throughout the company. In particular, Sinocchi says, IBM aims to be attractive to gay candidates who are looking for a workplace in which they can fit in and be open about their orientation. “Sometimes, gay people looking for jobs aren’t out yet, but maybe they’re hoping to find a place where they have a chance to come out, or where if people find out that they’re gay, it isn’t going to hurt their career at all. So we’re selling IBM as that sort of place.”


    Emphasizing gay employees’ opportunity to be out in the workplace has additional benefits for a company once they’re on the job, says the Wharton School’s Thomas. “GLBT employees are more likely to stay with employers that offer such policies and benefits even if they are offered a higher salary from a firm that does not offer these benefits and policies,” he says. “This of course lowers firm retention and recruiting costs.”

Posted on March 1, 2004June 29, 2023

Clean Slate

Laurie Siegel, senior vice president of human resources for the beleaguered conglomerate Tyco International, isn’t one to brood, hesitate or theorize. When she was offered the job, she knew she had to take it. When she showed up for work, she knew exactly what she had to do. “When you’re in a hole, you don’t need a PowerPoint presentation to tell you which way is up,” Siegel says. “You just head up. And you know you’re doing the right thing.”



    Siegel has been making the long climb toward the surface for 14 months. Difficult, high-pressure jobs are her specialty, and she’s obviously enjoying this one, but even she isn’t certain that the company will make it out of the pit dug by previous management. Tyco, which employs approximately 260,000 innocent bystanders, manufactures and sells everything from suture needles to circuit breakers, burglar alarms to duct tape. But to most of the world, its name is a synonym for corporate corruption. Its former chairman and chief financial officer face the possibility of significant jail time, and the company itself is involved in multiple shareholder lawsuits and an ongoing SEC investigation for malfeasance.


    Less widely publicized is the company’s tentative comeback under new CEO Edward Breen. Unlike most of its fellow corporate black sheep, Tyco has not yet been charged with accounting fraud, although various irregularities have prompted it to write down nearly $700 million. It has not declared bankruptcy, although it barely survived a liquidity crisis early last year. In the fiscal year that ended September 2003, Tyco earned $979 million, or 49 cents a share, rebounding from massive one-time charges and a horrific loss of $9.2 billion, or around $4.50 per share, for fiscal year 2002. Tyco’s stock, which traded at around $60 at its bubbly high in January 2002, plunged to $10 at its low point seven months later. In early February, it had climbed to $28.


    “I think Tyco is in good shape. It’s got good businesses and good margins and good new people,” says Eric Landry, an analyst for Morningstar Inc. Detractors, however, say that Tyco is just a loose collection of mundane businesses assembled to produce the illusion of real growth and might as well be dismantled.


    Whatever the ultimate outcome, Siegel, a 48-year-old straight arrow, will play an integral role. So will the galvanizing effect of her long-held belief in the power of tough but ethical competition. The Tyco scandal was a failure of corporate governance and of the strategic role of human resources, two of Siegel’s passions. Recalling a conversation she had with Breen about what her responsibilities would be, she says that her new boss put it something like this: “You have a mess to clean up. Clean it up. Build a system with an independent board, with a real compensation committee, so that what we know happened before will never happen again. Help us be an operationally excellent company. And make us a company that attracts and develops excellent talent.”


    Seated at a small conference table in a partially decorated office in Tyco’s nondescript new headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey, Siegel says with only a touch of irony, “It’s definitely a career-defining opportunity.”


    That’s the press-release version of what she told her friend and former colleague Robin Ferracone when they talked in late 2002. “Laurie said to me that she really liked Ed Breen,” says Ferracone, now a partner at Mercer Consulting in Los Angeles. “That it [Tyco] was the top human resources job anywhere. That this was what she’d been aspiring to her whole career. To take a new situation and make improvements to it, chart a new course. Set her own agenda. Connect with the people in the company and give them hope and security and confidence that they’ll have a place to work tomorrow.”


    When Jane Kennedy, vice president of staffing and one of Siegel’s first hires, arrived for work last March, Tyco had no corporate intranet, or even a company-wide e-mail system or phone book. There was no department of intellectual property, environmental safety or college recruiting. No labor attorneys. No CIO. “Of course, I didn’t have an assistant,” Kennedy says. “I had to grab Laurie’s assistant when she had a minute or two to spare.”


    Upon taking office, Breen, a no-nonsense former CEO of Motorola, fired the entire board of directors. He then dismissed the entire headquarters staff of 125 people. He recruited a new, completely independent board of directors and hired a CFO, an ombudsman and a vice president of corporate governance who reports directly to the board.


    While Breen has been dealing with investors, analysts and the media, hacking away at expenses and closing 200 of Tyco’s 2,000 facilities, Siegel has been working 12-hour days. Breen told her that her first priority was to set up corporate-governance and compensation systems and controls, then to transition “to really driving the talent machine.” For much of her tenure, she has handled both tasks simultaneously.


    During her first days, Siegel worked closely with the board and head of corporate governance to draft a strict company code of ethics. She then arranged to have it taught simultaneously at a special ethics training day in May to every Tyco employee. In the first few months, she also advised the compensation committee on how to replace Tyco’s old salary and bonus policy, which rewarded acquisition-based company growth. The new system is based on measurable company performance. Bonuses and restricted-stock grants are linked to objective measurements, including each business unit’s earnings before interest and taxes, and Tyco International’s overall performance.


    Top officers are required to hold company stock worth 3 to 10 times their yearly base salary. They must hold 75 percent of their restricted stock and stock options until a minimum level has been reached. Above that level, they must hold 25 percent for at least three years. Severance pay is limited to two times an individual’s yearly salary plus bonus. Post-handshake perks like consulting contracts and free transportation in company aircraft have been abolished.


    In the bad old days, Siegel says, Tyco hadn’t really been run as a corporation. Its growth was driven by acquisitions rather than increased sales or cost-cutting. “It was really organized as an M&A house, an investment firm that did deals,” she says. Another peculiarity was that Tyco management considered itself so special that it never bothered to compare its practices to those of other companies deemed successful by the outside world. “There was an arrogance,” she says. “And because of that, they never looked around and asked, ‘Well, what do great companies do for talent development?’ But now the tables have turned.”


    Siegel says that she makes a point of recruiting and hiring executives of “successful multi-industry companies.” Despite the stain on Tyco’s name and the new compensation policy, she’s had no problem attracting good people. A knowledge of or willingness to learn Six Sigma is mandatory. So is honesty, competitive fire and an attribute she calls “managerial courage.” “We need people who will say, ‘The Emperor has no clothes.’ “


    Recent hires have included alumni of GE, Dell, Siemens, Raytheon and Merck. Siegel also has reached down into the ranks of the “old” Tyco for talent. For several years Hal Johnson was in charge of leadership development at ADT, Tyco’s Florida-based security systems company. He was never able to convince anyone that similar programs should be implemented Tyco-wide. Two weeks after meeting Siegel, he was appointed Tyco’s vice president for leadership development.


    Since her arrival, Siegel has made more than 65 “mission critical” hires, not including the 100 auditors she recruited to conduct a crash company-wide audit. She still interviews three or four people a day, and confers with Breen and CFO David FitzPatrick at least once daily. “I would say that we have conversations about the business, we have conversations about people, we have conversations about how we think about life, how we think about how the company is doing. We’re a very action-oriented group. We use each other to help reflect. And to make sure we’re on the right track.”



Tyco management considered itself so special that it never bothered to compare its practices to those of
other companies deemed successful by the outside world. “There was an arrogance. And because of that,
they never looked around and asked,
‘Well, what do great companies
do for talent development?’
But now the tables have turned.”


    Breen credits Siegel with playing a pivotal role in keeping Tyco alive. “I think she’s fantastic,” Breen says. “If she hadn’t been here, we couldn’t have made nearly the progress that we have made.


    “Her office is next to mine,” he adds. “Doesn’t that tell you something?”


Missing Mr. Kozlowski
    Long before it became known for corporate larceny, Siegel had Tyco International on her mind. In 1998, when she was head of executive compensation at the aerospace firm AlliedSignal, she worked closely with its CEO on a takeover of electrical manufacturer AMP Inc. As the deal was closing, Tyco’s CEO, Dennis Kozlowski, acting as a “white knight,” gobbled up AMP. The failure of its acquisition led directly to AlliedSignal’s 1999 merger with Honeywell, with control going to Honeywell’s CEO. In 2001, GE made its hostile takeover bid for Honeywell.


    Feeling restless, Siegel explored her options. “My husband said, ‘Why don’t you send your résumé to Tyco?’ And I thought, Hmm, that might be fun. But to just send a résumé, then show up at their door and say, ‘I want to head up your HR organization’? I finally told him, ‘That’s not how you get a job, honey.’ ”


    Siegel’s adherence to executive protocol served her well. With the help of a somnolent board of directors and compliant underlings, Kozlowski and his CFO, Mark Swartz, allegedly turned Tyco into their own private ATM. In 1999, Kozlowski’s official yearly compensation was $170 million, but in mid-2002, New York State authorities accused the pair of supplementing their paychecks with $600 million in self-awarded bonuses, misappropriated funds and tainted stock sales. A suddenly energized Tyco board demanded and got Kozlowski’s resignation. Several months later, Siegel got an unsolicited call from a headhunter who was recruiting for Tyco.


    For much of her time at Tyco, Siegel has had the unusual experience of working in near anonymity to save a company whose ex-managers are involved in a high-profile trial. Last year her predecessor, former human resources chief Patricia Prue, testified for the prosecution that she was (1) a recipient of Kozlowski’s largess, (2) clueless as to the legality or illegality of his actions, and (3) powerless to stop them. Siegel won’t comment directly on Prue, whom she’s never met, but will say, “If you look at the people who work in corporate human resources today and the people that worked there in years before, the profile has changed completely.”


Action figure
    Born in Chicago, Laurie Siegel is the daughter of a physician who “was absolutely passionate about his work” and often got up in the middle of the night to handle emergencies. Her mother was a homemaker. “Interestingly, she was a very talented musician, but her family was poor and all the money went for lessons for her brother because he was the boy,” Siegel says. “So she always instilled in me the message, ‘You have every opportunity to fly. Make sure you don’t miss your chance.’ ”


    After graduating from the University of Michigan with a bachelor’s degree in general studies, she entered the Harvard Design School to study architecture and city planning. But halfway through the graduate program, she dropped out. Architecture wasn’t for her. “There’s a lot of dealing with bureaucracy, massaging things politically. It takes 10 years to get permission to build things and another 10 years to get them built. I thought, ‘This will drive me nuts. Absolutely crazy.’ ”


    She entered Harvard Business School in the mid-1980s. “I was entirely stimulated by the environment,” she says. She also remembers that at her graduation many classmates pasted dollar signs on their mortarboards. “A lot of otherwise great people got caught up in that. I bet a lot of them now think, ‘That was pretty tacky.’”


    After graduation, Siegel joined Strategic Compensation Associates, a Los Angeles consulting firm where she worked with Ferracone. “We were part of a movement toward value-based measures of performance,” Siegel says. “Figuring out the real drivers of value, then rewarding people for creating, not destroying it. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?” Ferracone remembers Siegel completing projects for clients under extremely tight deadlines. In 1993 Siegel joined Avon, where she was in charge of executive compensation. There she worked with Alan Hait, now vice president for compensation and benefits at InterActiveCorp in New York. “When we got there, the attitude was, ‘The company will be nice to you no matter what you do,’ ” Hait says. “Laurie was part of the team that changed the company. She installed long-term incentives that rewarded executives for sticking their necks out.”


    Jim Taiclet, her former boss at Honeywell’s aerospace division and now CEO of American Tower Corp., marvels at how Siegel assembled a talented crew for a dot.com subsidiary without offering them inflated salaries or stock options. She did it by finding talent in her own organization rather than bidding for Silicon Valley superstars. She also kept everyone calm through a nerve-racking period of takeovers and mergers. “I was thrilled with how she managed people,” Taiclet says. “I can’t remember anyone leaving us at that time.”


    Siegel is married to Joseph Nosofsky, a financial services executive who now runs a DVD production and marketing company out of their home. They have two teenage daughters, for whom Siegel zealously guards her weekends.


    If, as she predicts, Tyco becomes a company with the same boring crises as any other non-scandal-ridden corporation, she says that she might consider leaving. Perhaps for another corporate basket case, perhaps one where it’s her job to fire the bad guys. “Let’s put it this way,” Siegel says. “I’ve been married to the same man for 14 years. So there are areas where I need stability. But in my career life, if I do anything for more than two years, I get bored.”


Workforce Management, March 2004, pp. 26-33 — Subscribe Now!

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress