Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on August 17, 2001July 10, 2018

Think Twice Truths About Conventional Wisdom

By milling around HR trade shows, I hear a variety of buzzwords, catchphrases,and clichés. I thought I’d examine whether three I heard this summerhave any validity.


“When you communicate, always be polite.”
Our society — and in turn, our workplaces — has gottenso sensitive about what we say that we often fail to communicate what we reallymean.


We don’t have to work so hard at sugarcoating.


“If you want a workplace that’s very innovativeand moves fast, people have to cut to the chase and say what they really mean,”says Peg C. Neuhauser, a corporate culture guru. “I’m not advocating rude.But you’re going to have to find a way to tell it like it is.”


One of Neuhauser’s clients was a large company thathappened to be in the HR consulting business. Every time this company held ameeting, she says, “When someone made a statement and the group disagreed,the others would say, ‘Let me build on what Todd just said,’ instead of ‘Todd,you’re a full-blown idiot.’ ‘Let me build on’ was code that you were going togo into a 180-degree direction.”


Neuhauser isn’t advocating name-calling. But she triedto get the company to come up with a more direct phrase than “Let me buildon….” Instead, she suggested: “That’s not exactly the way I seeit.”


The company didn’t adopt the expression, but it diddiscuss the issue of being more straightforward. Staff members still use thewords “let me build on,” but when they do, everyone laughs. “Thecompany’s culture changed on a dime,” Neuhauser says. “What it’s doneis use humor as a springboard for being more open and honest with one another.”


“Everyone should be strategic.”
Even if everyone could be strategic — which is nevergoing to happen — it probably wouldn’t be a great idea. That’s because strategiesare a dime a dozen, but two things prevent many of them from going anywhere.


First of all, many organizations have a hard time convincingtheir workforces that they should really care about the strategy, really embraceit.


“A lot of organizations have strategies, but theystay pretty much on paper rather than in the hearts and minds of people,”says Colleen O’Sullivan, a leadership director at AchieveGlobal, a major internationaltraining company. O’Sullivan says management has to present a better argumentfor a strategy than the fact that it might make money.


Second, even if employees buy into a strategy, unfortunatelythey often aren’t trained in the skills they need to carry it out. “IfI don’t know it, I don’t care about it, and most important, I’m not competentto do it, it won’t happen,” she says.


“Make your employees feel like the office is a home.”
Businesses have invested tremendous energy in makingemployees feel like their offices are their homes. Employers are blurring thelines between work and home by providing discounts on sporting events and travel,time for naps, and benefits like dry-cleaning and concierge services, as wellas letting employees bring their pets to work.


That’s all great, but it carries two risks.


First, when employees feel like the office is a home,it raises their expectations so high that the employer may never be able tofulfill them. They may forget that money spent on all that dry-cleaning doesn’tcome from thin air.


“Installing expensive programs the corporationcan’t afford and people really don’t need is not only foolhardy, it’s the antithesisof caring, because someday somebody’s gotta pay for that stuff,” says BillCatlette, author of Contented Cows Give Better Milk.


Also, it’s probably a lot more painful for employeesif they are let go. The employees lose not just a job, but a second home.


A homey environment makes such decisions harder foreveryone, Catlette says. “In those corporations where layoffs are beinginflicted, it surely hurts more, at least for the folks who have to leave, andfor those whose duty it is to deliver that message.”


Workforce, August 2001, pp.— SubscribeNow!



Other columns by Todd:


  • Ecology,the Next Apartheid
  • YouDo Want a Higher Minimum Wage
  • TheWorld Doesn’t Revolve Around IT
  • WhySenior Citizens Should Fly
  • Walkin Her Boots, Mr. President

Posted on August 15, 2001July 10, 2018

Dear Workforce How Do We Implement TQM

Q

Dear Workforce:


Organizations practicing total quality management (TQM) have a long-termcommitment to quality and consider quality to be the core value. What are thekey points in TQM and what are some ways to improve it?


– Office Administrator, software/systems, Kuala Lumpur.


A Dear TQM:


Total Quality Management (TQM) generally refers to a comprehensive systemwhereby companies are able to achieve extraordinary levels of quality in theirdelivered products and services. Most people, when they think TQM, invariablythink about automation technology, super-efficient processes, close supplierrelationships, and analytical tools like statistical process control that leadto so-called “Six-Sigma” levels of quality.


These elements represent the foundation of an effective TQM program. Asimportant as these elements are, however, the really hard part of achieving orsustaining TQM is getting beyond mouthing platitudes to actually implementinghuman capital practices that will drive and sustain the appropriate culturechange.


Culture change is where the human capital notions of competencies andperformance management enter the picture. Competencies, in short, are thebehaviors and the skills that top performers demonstrate. In a TQM environment,top performers demonstrate these six key competencies:

  • Customer focus by proactively seeking input from internal and externalcustomers.

  • Ownership and accountability by handling ambiguity well and taking personalresponsibility for outcomes.

  • Analytical problem solving by effectively utilizing analytic tools toidentify root causes and assess problems and opportunities.

  • Process orientation by using operating metrics to drive continuous processimprovements.

  • Attention to detail by processing large amounts of detailed information whilestill understanding the big picture.

  • Results orientation by initiating and executing needed actions in a fast andfocused manner).

Performance management is one of the key means by which organizations givemanagers incentive to drive for desired results. In a TQM environment, thecompetencies noted above must be integral to an effective performance managementsystem. Managers must be assessed and rewarded on how well they have achievedoperating results, as well as how effective they have been in applying these keycompetencies that are, essentially, the long-term enablers of high performance.Identified competency shortcomings naturally lead to education, training andrelated self-development activities.


Companies that combine the foundation elements noted earlier with theappropriate competencies integrated into an effective performance managementsystem will be able to sustain and improve a long-term TQM culture.


SOURCE: Dr. Gerald Michael, senior consultant, organization developmentpractice, Unifi Networks, a subsidiary of PricewaterhouseCoopers, Boston, Mass.,April 11, 2001.


LEARN MORE: See “Change Keeps TQM ProgramsThriving“


The information contained in this article is intended to provide usefulinformation on the topic covered, but should not be construed as legal advice ora legal opinion. Also remember that state laws may differ from the federal law.

Ask a Question

Dear Workforce Newsletter

Posted on August 14, 2001July 10, 2018

Five Ways to Combat Office Gossip

Here’s how HR can reduce the problemsassociated with office gossip:

  • Keep employees informed. Whenemployees know what’s going on within an organization, particularlywith regard to company directives, promotions, and potential actions, they’refar less inclined to speculate. Effective communication can take place online,through a newsletter, and at weekly face-to-face departmental meetings.

  • Help build a culture that’ssupportive rather than overly competitive. The worst gossip and mobbingproblems often occur at organizations where the climb to the top is ruthless.HR can aid workers by instituting support systems, including counselingfor those who instigate or wind up as the target of gossip. It’s alsoimportant to educate senior management about the problem.

  • Let workers know that maliciouspersonal gossip is not acceptable. Attacking other employees — whetherout of boredom or dislike for an individual, or for political gain — cancreate severe tension, animosity, and organizational problems. It’salso not fair to the victim. Employees should know how damaging it is topartake in gossip and mobbing.

  • Deal with rumors immediately.Left unchecked, a rumor can quickly spiral out of control. It can quicklysap energy and productivity as workers spend time speculating about thingsrather than getting work done. When a problem arises, talk to employeesindividually and, if necessary, set up a meeting between the victim andthose spreading the rumor.

  • Confront chronic offenders.Those who spend an inordinate amount of time gossiping should know thatthe behavior is not acceptable. One way to deal with the issue is to addressa perceived problem during an employee evaluation. However, it might alsobe necessary to sit an offender down and discuss the problem when it occurs.

Workforce, July 2001, p. 26— SubscribeNow!

Posted on August 12, 2001July 10, 2018

Low-Cost Tips for Successful Inpatriation

Companies that send their employees to work in foreign countries typically helpthem get oriented to a new culture, customs, and language. But when U.S. companiesrelocate employees here from other countries, it’s often a different story.


    Although 78 percent of the companies surveyed by Relocation Resources International(RRI) transferred employees to the United States, only 50 percent of them offeredunique relocation policies for these “inpatriates” or “inpats,”as they’re called. They’re often plunked into a strange land without even thesupport of an expatriate community that Americans often have to soften the cross-culturallanding.


    “There’s an American on practically every corner in Paris,” saysLaura Herring, president and CEO of The IMPACT Group. “There is not someonefrom Dusseldorf on every corner in Clayton, Missouri.”


    The companies in the survey acknowledged that inpats needed assistance withsuch issues as child care and schooling, but they didn’t offer the services,typically citing the need to save money, according to RRI.


    It may be that companies also are suffering from a touch of ethnocentrism,says Michael S. Schell, CEO of ExpatSpouse.com, a global online community forfamilies transferred abroad by their employers. “America perceives itselfas the best place to be, and we think everyone wants to be here,” Schellsays. “There’s the idea that you’re lucky to have this assignment.”


    But global relocation experts say that adjusting to life in the United Statesis not a snap. For the first time since 1995, the United States was listed asone of the most challenging foreign assignments in the Global Relocation Trends2000 Survey Report, sponsored by GMAC Global Relocation Services/Windham International,the National Foreign Trade Council, and SHRM Global Forum.


    Fortunately, there are a number of things that HR people in charge of inboundrelocations can do to ease the transition for inpatriated employees and theirfamilies. Many of the strategies are not expensive, and they can make all thedifference between a productive work assignment and a costly failure.


Conduct a Needs Assessment
    As soon as HR knows there is going to be a relocationfrom a foreign country, a representative should contact the family and conducta needs assessment, says Diane McIntire, director of career and family servicesfor Cornerstone Relocation Group, a relocation company based in Warren, NewJersey. Cornerstone’s four-page form covers basic contact information, movedates, descriptions of the family’s needs, and housing preferences. Once theform has been completed, a counselor calls to discuss the
assessment with the family.


    The process gives HR a picture of the family and any special needs it mighthave. It’s good to know at the outset about a family’s plans to bring a 150-pounddog to a Manhattan apartment, or that a spouse has a chronic medical problemthat will make establishing health-care contacts a top priority for HR.


    A commercial marketing specialist for a pharmaceutical company had a particularlychallenging family situation. The woman was relocating to the East Coast fromSwitzerland and needed help finding the right day care for her four-year-olddaughter. The little girl speaks Chinese and German, but no English. The employer’srelocation consultants helped the employee, a single mom, find a family day-caresetting that would be a good fit for her daughter. The company also arrangedfor English instruction for mother and daughter. Finding such resources by herselfwould have been very, very difficult, the mother notes.


    Since arriving in the United States at the end of March, the little girl hasbecome more comfortable with day care and is quickly picking up English phrases,including “OK” and “I love you.” “She sings a lot oflove songs,” her mother says.


Do Your Homework
    While the inpat family is compiling its list of needsand wishes, it’s time for you to anticipate the difficulties your inpatriatedemployee and family will face, says Tara Brabazon, director of interculturalservices for GMAC Global Relocation Services. A quick Internet search to gatherinformation on the home country’s culture can be a useful starting point, shesays.


    The Internet can also help you research good neighborhoods or areas for thetransplanted family, she says. “If you’re involved in making a housingrecommendation, it’s good to know where the ethnic communities are. If you’rein Kansas City, Kansas, and you have an Indian family inbound, it’s good toknow where the Indian community is — and there’s a huge one in Kansas City,for instance. But if you’re putting them way across town from it, you’re nothelping. You’re separating them from stores, schools,” and other culturalanchors that would help them feel at home.


Address Expectations
    When you have the completed needs assessment, you canuse it to help the family get an accurate picture of life in the United Statesand understand the differences they’re going to encounter, global relocationexperts say.


    “So many people inbound to the U.S. think they know it through moviesand TV,” Brabazon says. “But they’re not a good representation ofwhat life is like here.”


    Crime, for instance, is a big issue with relocating employees, she says. “Inthe past year, the majority of inbound families have been concerned that theirchildren are going to get shot at,” she says. Having crime statistics athand for the city of relocation can help counter the impression that life inthe U.S. is just like a Schwarzenegger movie.


    Some inpat spouses might hope to continue their careers in the United States.The assessment process gives HR an opportunity to explain that the U.S. is verystrict about its work permits and that most spouses probably will not be allowedto work at a paying job, Schell says. At the same time, the U.S. has ample volunteeropportunities that HR can scout for a spouse who wants to find meaningful workand a way to hone her skills for work when she returns home.


    It’s a good idea to prepare families for some rental price shock. In many countries,housing isn’t nearly as expensive as it is here. In addition to giving familiesan idea of what to expect, it’s wise to guide their rental shopping wheneverpossible. Some inpats, in an effort to keep costs down, rent in unsafe neighborhoods,or in suburbs that are too far from the office for a reasonable commute. Thatkind of housing also might isolate a non-driving spouse.


    Now also is the time to talk about lifestyle in the United States. In manyforeign countries, families have access to low-cost domestic help, and lotsof it. McIntire says that one client, a Brazilian chemist, was used to havingthree domestic workers. In the United States, she discovered that the threedomestics she could afford were “me, myself, and I.”


Gather Resources for the Family
    Because there might be pressure on the employee andhis family not to ask for help, it’s important to give them resources they canuse on their own, global relocation experts say. That might include providinghelpful Web sites and building a list of contacts with social, professional,or recreation groups with shared interests. It could mean that you’ve scoutedout services — everything from medical professionals to plumbers to dry cleaners– that can work with them in their own language, or at least are willing totry.


    Another resource you can provide is to identify someone in the inpat’s homecountry who has worked here and returned home, Brabazon says. “You canask that person to be a mentor, someone that’s a safe person to ask questionsof. That person can also help in the readjustment when the employee is repatriated.”

Tipsfor Coping
HRcan help inpats manage their culture shock with some basic strategies. Youcan suggest they:

  • Talk about theirfeelings.
  • Avoid constantcomparisons with home.
  • Search for remediesto problems.
  • Gain a basic knowledgeof the language so they can speak and read comfortably.
  • Identify and adopta local community.
  • Use local products.
  • Attend local festivalsand concerts.
  • Subscribe to thelocal paper.
  • Associate withpositive minded people.
  • Make friends withthose expatriates who are enjoying the new environment.
  • Spend leisuretime together; travel.
  • Maintain familyvalues and adhere to established rules.
  • Develop a newinterest or hobby that would not be possible at home.
  • Keep in touchwith home and friends.
  • Share their ownculture with friends and locals.

Set Up an In-Depth Briefing
    A thoroughly researched inpat briefing session thatcovers key issues is critical for a family’s relocation success, Schell says.Ideally, the briefing would be done before the family leaves its home country.But realistically, he says, “that’s not going to happen.” So it shouldtake place as soon after the family’s arrival as possible.


    Who should be there? Not just the employee, but the employee and the spouse.You can’t assume that the employee will convey all the information presentedin the briefing to his spouse. Furthermore, Schell says, “It is not reasonableto assume that you can tell an employee’s spouse, ‘Call me if you have problems,’and they will. Their husbands will tell them: ‘Don’t you pick up that phoneand embarrass me.’ That’s why self-help tools are so important.”


    Schell describes the outcome of one such husband edict: a Spanish woman, relocatedto England with her husband, wound up doing laundry and dishes by hand becauseshe didn’t know how to use the washing machine, and the dishwasher wasn’t functioning.Her husband forbade her to call his company for help. She didn’t know whom tocall, and her husband’s promises that he would take care of it went unmet. Thatcould just as easily happen here, Schell says.


Address These Three Briefing Basics: Credit, Housing, Schools
    Credit: Most inpatriates have no U.S.-based credit history.Without it, they’ll be hard-pressed to buy a car, get a credit card, or evenrent an apartment. They will need the help of the company and a cooperativebank in order to apply for, receive, use, and make payments on a credit cardimmediately, so they have a credit history. This is an issue that doesn’t requiremoney from the company, but it does require “focused attention to finda solution, because there isn’t a ready-made solution,” Schell says. “Thecompany has to grease the skids for the inpatriate at the bank and at the creditcard company.”


    Housing: HR also can help inpats with housing by making a connection for themwith a real estate broker who is willing (probably for a fee) to help them findappropriate housing. “Ideally, you could identify, do a little training,and sensitize the real estate brokers you would want to be using,” he says.That real estate professional also would be linked to you and your company,so that if the inpat was unsure about a decision, the broker would know thatyou could be contacted to help work it out. The company might also have to bewilling to stand behind the employee in order for him to secure a lease on ahome, Schell says. Many landlords are leery of renting to inpatriates. Knowingthat there’s recourse to the company if something goes wrong will make themmore comfortable.


    Schools: Making decisions about where the family’schildren will go to school might precede the housing relocation, according toa Prudential Relocation white paper, “The United States as a Foreign Destination.”It cites the example of a Swiss executive relocating to Manhattan. He examinedthe relocation consultant’s research on schools and opted for a German schoolin a commuter suburb, and then found housing in that area.
Here are some key questions to ask about schools in preparation for passingon the
information to the inpat, according to Prudential:

  • Is an international baccalaureate program available in the district inwhich the child might be located?

  • How much freedom do teachers have in planning curriculum? In countrieswith national standards, the government requires teachers to follow a prescribedcurriculum.

  • Is an English-as-a-second-language program available? Not every schooldistrict has ESL classes or even teachers who understand the needs of asecond-language learner. The company should not assume that the inpat’schildren will go to public school, Schell says.

     “If I’m being relocated to France, there’s noquestion that the company will let me send my kids to the American school there.If inpats are coming here, they have to negotiate a school allowance. It’s ahuge issue to drop a foreign child into a public school. There are issues ofdress, manner of addressing teachers…everything is different.”


Prepare Them for Culture Shock
    Inpats (and expats) go through a predictable cycle whenthey relocate, Brabazon says. There’s a honeymoon phase, when everything aboutthe new country is great, exciting, and wonderful.


    Pretty quickly, though, they hit “crisis mode,” a major dip downward,when everything about the new country is annoying and difficult. This is thepoint, Herring says, when relocation counselors often get teary phone callsfrom spouses, who in trying to do something that was so easy at home — cooka special dish, for instance — can’t find what they need, and decide they’vebeen relegated to a circle of hell. It’s not really about the lack of a certainmustard , Herring says. It’s culture shock.


    With help, things get easier as time passes, the experts say, until the familyis about to return home, when they realize that they like it here. Then it’stime for another adjustment. Once they return home, there’s the honeymoon, andthe cycle repeats. Then it’s time for repatriation counseling, Brabazon says.

Symptomsof Shock
Thereare certain symptoms HR might observe as inpatriates adjust to their livesin a new country. HR might also consider giving inpats this list, so they’llrecognize what’s happening.

  • Boredom
  • Withdrawal (avoidingcontact with the local nationals, spending much time at home readingor writing, speaking only to a few other expatriates)
  • Needing excessiveamounts of sleep
  • Eating or drinkingtoo much
  • Unexplainableemotional outbursts or crying jags
  • Excessive cleanliness
  • Physical distresssuch as recurrent stomach-aches, headaches, or other ailments
  • Blaming localnationals (repeated discussions that begin with, “The people areso …” or “This would never happen at home!”)
  • Blaming the company
  • Blaming one’sspouse
  • Family tensionand conflict
  • Excessive involvementin outside activities (overextending oneself)
  • Being extremelyimpatient and quick to criticize

Build a Case for Return on Investment
    If you think your budget is inadequate and you wantto secure funds for such services as cross-cultural classes or spousal languagetraining, you can try a technique that Herring developed as she worked to repaira relocation gone awry.


    An inpatriated Chinese employee and his wife were relocated from Los Angeles,which has a huge Chinese population, to corporate headquarters in Dallas. Itmade little difference to the employee, who spent 75 percent of his time travelingto China on sales calls.


    But his wife, who spoke no English, found herself stranded in suburban Plano,without other Chinese-speakers, markets, or friends. She was miserable, andafter several months, the executive pleaded for a return to Los Angeles. Management’sfirst answer was no, Herring says, because the L.A.-to-Dallas move had cost$57,000. The company wasn’t willing to spend that amount again.

The HR person who received the case sought Herring’s help because she had heardher talk about return on investment in a relocation. Together the two gatheredinformation, and learned that the executive produced sales of $2 million a monthduring his overseas trips. Given his sales abilities, his facility in five Chinesedialects, and his willingness to spend 75 percent of his time traveling, itwas estimated that it would take 18 months to replace him.


    “If they had to replace him, they would have a loss of $36 million inrevenue,” Herring says. For $57,000, they could move him back and keephim. The HR person took Herring’s one sheet of data to the company’s management.The return to L.A. was promptly approved.


    “It’s become a model that I use for inpats all the time,” Herringsays. “What is the value this individual is bringing to you? Does the companythink it can’t afford to spend money for a good relocation? It’s really, ‘Canyou afford not to?’ The cost needs to be measured in terms of return on investmentfor the growth of the entire company, not just this solitary relocation.”


Workforce, August 2001, pp. 42-47— SubscribeNow!

Posted on August 10, 2001June 29, 2023

Privacy in an Age of Online Record-Keeping

As more and more employers store and share employee information electronically,HR professionals face a major question: What is the company’s liability as faras privacy goes? If a service provider leaks your company’s confidential employeeinformation, who gets sued? If a hacker gains access to the data, is it the company’sfault? It’s a worrisome are — particularly when it comes to medical records.Kerry Kearney, partner and head of the privacy task force for Reed Smith in Pittsburgh,offers some guidelines.


What are the protocols for electronically sharing private employee information– like medical records — with service providers?
There’s no national requirement, no uniform standard in terms of how far theemployer has to go with protecting employee medical information. That goes forwhether the sharing is in-house, or whether the information is shared with serviceproviders. However, there is a growing body of case law and state statutes sayingthat you need to provide confidentiality for information that’s not of a publicnature. And I don’t know a single employer that does not feel an obligationto protect the privacy of employee information. But it’s not a right set instone. It’s a common-law right. People recognize that private information shouldstay private.
What should employers consider when sharing information with service providerselectronically?
One thing employers could do to protect themselves is to enter into contractsthat require the service providers to accord privacy and security to employeeinformation that is transferred.
If the information gets leaked or mishandled on the service provider’s end,is there liability for the employer?
Sure. If the employer failed to enter into a contract whereby the service providerundertook to provide confidentiality, then the common-law cause of action couldseek money damages from the employer for being cavalier about the way it handledconfidential employee information. So you need to protect yourself by contract,and make sure the entity with whom you enter into a business relationship isa viable company. Because if that company gets sued and is no longer around,they’ll look to you for money.
How should a company store medical information electronically?
Employers aren’t allowed to use medical information much. If an employee comesto you seeking an accommodation because he or she has a medical condition, thenyou have an affirmative obligation to do what you can to help. That requiresa record of their medical problem. But most employers very carefully segregateout any health information about employees from anything to do with personnel.So personnel records normally wouldn’t have medical information, unless theemployee is claiming entitlement under ADA or FMLA, for example. Then you’dhave the information, but you should be very careful not to disseminate it morewidely than is absolutely necessary.
There’s been a lot of buzz about HIPAA’s new medical privacy regulations– what do employers need to know?
The first thing they need to know is that they are not covered entities forpurposes of the new HIPAA medical privacy regulations unless they have a self-insuredERISA plan. So if they’re self-insured for purposes of ERISA for employee health,then that department is covered by HIPAA, the Health Insurance Portability andAccountability Act of 1996. They would need to comply with the HIPAA privacystandards. They’ll be effective on April 13, 2003. But it doesn’t normally applyto employers. The bottom line for most employers in regard to HIPAA is thatthey won’t be allowed to use employee claims information to buy insurance coverage.
Where does the liability lie if the company computer gets hacked and theemployee information is accessed?
There has been no litigation in which any company has been found responsiblefor not operating a secure site that results in hacking. Your company does havean obligation to maintain a certain standard of security. To the extent youdo not, and you harm somebody with whom you have an obligation, a relationship,that person could claim you had acted tortiously.
But there’s no history of such litigation as yet?
The only verdict I can think of that’s close is Doe v. Medlantic HealthcareGroup Inc. A District of Columbia superior court awarded a plaintiff patient$250,000 for a hospital’s lack of adequate security measures in protecting patientmedical information online. The patient was HIV-positive and his records wereaccessed by a part-time unauthorized employee and then disclosed to coworkers.The court cited lack of security, including the inability of software used bythe hospital to trace and identify who had accessed the records.
So what does happen if the violation is internal — if an employee accessesthe information?
Ideally you should have specific policies in place that address the sanctions,and procedures for enforcing compliance up to termination. In addition to that,if you want to avoid getting in trouble yourself, you have to be able to showyou had in place state-of-the-art procedures to avoid employee malfeasance.We talk about hackers, but the majority of computerized losses that companiessuffer are from employees rather than outsiders. There has historically beena recognition that you’re most vulnerable from those who really know you. Inthis case, that’s obviously your employees. They’re the ones who know whereyour vulnerabilities are.
What should a company do security-wise to avoid liability?
How you go about providing security is not set in stone anywhere, but you wantto be thinking about your physical safeguards. Do you have password-protectedcomputers? Do you regulate access to the data systems? Is there a person incharge of security? Are there firewalls in place? Do you have chain-of-trustagreements with anybody who exchanges data? Do you have internal audit procedures?Do you train employees so they know what their obligations are? Do you havetraining on security management? Are there discipline or termination proceduresfor employees who violate your security regulations? And of course, everybodyshould have an employee e-mail policy. And not just for employees dealing withsensitive information — every employee. It should emphasize that the employerowns the e-mails, and they will be monitored.
How much legal protection does all that provide?
If you are going to be sued by third parties who claim your procedures werelax, even if you don’t avoid liability, you’ll reduce the damages if you proveyou did everything you could. You had good procedures in place, and this particularperson was so determined, he or she had to go through several levels of securityto get this information and do the dirty deed.
Workforce, August 2001, pp. 72-73—

Posted on August 10, 2001July 10, 2018

Outline of a Change Strategy

Below is an outline of a change strategy from an organization preparing itselffor e-commerce through the realignment of its product groupings, the upgradeof its information management systems, and expansion of its ability to cross-sellproducts between its dispersed companies.


Umbrella Outcome: To become a preeminent e-business that sells customizedfamilies of products


Positioning: Top Priority


Bold Actions

  • Conduct large group employee meetings(100-1,000 people) in every market worldwide to generate input to the casefor change and vision.

  • Realign executive incentive programto motivate e-commerce support and lavishly reward cross-company selling.

  • Create a high-powered video thatdramatizes the vision of worldwide inter-company selling over the Internet.

  • Retire Product X.

Strategic Levers

  • Incorporate e-commerce strategiesin every business.

  • Reorganize to consolidate interdependentproducts and services.

  • Realign worldwide information technologysystems to enable cross-selling.

  • Reposition our image in the marketplaceas a one-stop shop.

  • Reorganize customer point of contactfor ease and expansion of sales.

  • Replace all of Europe’s informationmanagement systems.

  • Executive level breakthrough trainingprocess for top 2,000 leaders to address obsolete mindset, leadership styles,and behaviors.

Participation Strategies

  • Worldwide information managementdesign input conference.

  • Cross-company task forces.

  • International best practices studytour.

  • Change advocates identified fromevery product and service line.

  • Customer Advisory Council.

Change Infrastructure

  • Top executive change sponsor.

  • All company presidents on the changeleadership team.

  • Information technology change processleader

  • All companies appoint top-level changeprocess leaders, linked to worldwide change process leader.

  • Senior-level change consultants,with consulting support staff in every company.

  • Open-door network of change advocatesfor design and impact analysis.

  • Published conditions for success.

  • Worldwide, interactive communicationplan.

  • Electronic input of new informationto e-commerce change process Web site.

Milestone Events

  • January, Year 1: Kick off with interactivevideo; rollout of leadership breakthrough process.

  • January-March, Year 1: Team-basedcommunications about case for change, vision, and change strategy worldwide.

  • March, Year 1: Information technologycompatibility assessment; change readiness assessment in every company;sales education process.

  • September, Year 1: Retire ProductX; initiate design process.

  • January, Year 2: Turn key date forEurope’s new information management systems; worldwide impact analysis.

  • February, Year 2: Develop implementationmaster plan for pilot test in Asia.

  • March, Year 2: Pilot inter-companyelectronic selling in Asia with Products A, B, and C.

  • September, Year 2: Evaluate pilotand integrate learnings into organization-wide implementation plans.

  • December, Year 2: Worldwide promotionof e-commerce availability and benefits.

  • January, Year 3: Worldwide rollout.

Timeline

  1. Year One: Assessment.

  2. Year Two: Design and pilot.

  3. Years Three/Four: Marketing of thee-commerce brand and rollout of the new business.

Reprinted withpermission from TheChange Leader’s Roadmap, by Linda Ackerman Andersonand Dean Anderson, Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, 2001.

Posted on August 10, 2001July 10, 2018

Northport Good Management Doubled Profit in Two Years

Northport is an international public relations firm. Here, we will listen tothe people of their New York office (the executive committeeand the mid-level group), which achieved a financial performance52 percent above the average for all the offices in our database. They doubledtheir profit in two years, and achieved a profit per employee some 80 percentabove the norm. Here in descending order, are the ten areas in which they mostout-performed the average on an employee survey, by amounts ranging from 18to 50 percent.

  1. We have high-quality training opportunitiesto improve skills.

  2. Management shows by their actionsthat employee training is important.

  3. Around here you are required, notjust encouraged, to learn and develop new skills.

  4. Enthusiasm and morale around herehave never been higher.

  5. We have an effective system in placeto measure client feedback.

  6. This place has done a good job ofproviding the training I’ve needed to do my job well.

  7. I am actively helped with my personaldevelopment.

  8. I am given the chance at the officeto learn and develop new skills.

  9. We keep our people informed aboutwhat is happening in the office.

  10. We regularly discuss our progresstoward our strategic objectives, not just the financial goals.

The executive committee:
    What are we doing to get our results? Most of our timeas an executive committee is spent on HR issues. As a firm, we have been measuringemployee attitudes and concerns via a survey since 1991, very early in the firm’slife. The staff takes the surveys very seriously, and they know we do too. Wemake complete disclosure of the results, and give a formal two-hour presentationto all employees.


    We put out a written highlight report as well. We then have individual groupmeetings to zero in on issues of importance to each specific group. We makepublic commitments about the initiatives and actions. The staff knows the surveysare important because they affect what goes on. For example, one survey showedour salaries weren’t up to market levels and people wanted us to address salaries.And we did.


    Morale here is very high. We hire fabulous people, and we explicitly hire forenthusiasm, excitement, and sparks. We are also selective about clients. Wetry to keep only those that are exciting. We will walk away from clients ifwe question whether we can work with them — if it is not fun, creative or exciting.Employees give us big points for this. It is easier nowadays to replace clientsthan good employees.


    We work long, hard hours, so we are inevitably a big part of the staff’s sociallife. Social connections lead to a more team-based atmosphere. People nowadaysare looking for a community where they work. It is more than having Fun Fridays.We offer French lessons, outings, a book-readers club and many other events.The interactions among employees that result from these make for meaningfulwork relationships.


    We have a monthly all-staff meeting, designed to be a business update and toallow the teams a chance to look at what went right or wrong in a non-threateningatmosphere. We take the opportunity to have a giggle. Each month one of ourgroups is responsible for running the meeting. There is usually a theme, withdecorations, and prizes. This all builds a team spirit, which makes money forus, we have no doubt.


    If someone is not a team player here, even if they are good technically, theydon’t survive. Everyone here is expected to be self-motivated and vibrant. Ifwe make a mistake and hire an individual who isn’t these things, the team startsto exclude that person long before the manager picks up on it. It’s a self-correctingprocess that takes place naturally. A client once said they liked our firm becausethey knew that “No one has a private agenda” and they could speakto anyone on team and would be helped. That’s worth a lot of money.


    We have a more rigorous career development approach than other firms. Orientationis thorough. We have a six-week “how is it going meeting?” then threemonths, then six months. These are done very formally in this office comparedto other offices of our firm.


    We are also rigorous about on-time performance reviews. If they don’t get doneon time, a person’s raise doesn’t go through. If a manager neglects to do thecareer development review stuff, his or her own bonus is reduced significantly.


    Coaching programs are held regularly. People need feedback all the time, aswell as in-depth guidance of how to develop. As we get bigger, we have usedsome programs from outside the firm to help us develop coaching skills in oursenior managers. This is very expensive but we’re sure it’s worth it.


    If a manager were not a good coach, financial consequences would occur. Inthe long run, lack of coaching skill would not be tolerated. But we go to greatlengths to save such a person, such as hiring a personal coach to help him.


    We regularly ask employees whether they have good role models in the office,and we have been getting higher scores every year. We think this is a centralelement of our success.


    We must give our managers and other senior people the skills needed to retainthe best employees, especially in this people crisis we are experiencing. Wehave large clients looking for longer-term relationships and it is essentialthat we maintain teams to keep the clients happy and satisfied. Savvy clientsappreciate a team that grows with them.


    Each manager’s job is to balance client service, employee development and businesshealth. Even though it’s difficult, this is not rocket science. We are doinggood, obvious management stuff. What is different here is that we are actuallyenforcing it and there are consequences if managers don’t do it. This is nota loose environment despite the fun things we try to do.


    We are organized and have good financial controls in place. There is a lotof structure. After employees get through the first few months they appreciatethe structure, because the systems that are in place are designed to run thebusiness in an efficient, profitable and fun way. This means a more disciplinedoffice. The trick is to find the right combination of fun and discipline thatgets the job done.


    We practice financial transparency with the staff. Except for salaries, wediscuss everything financial with managers on a quarterly basis, and this materialgets passed down to employees. We let everyone know the hard numbers. This alsoshows our commitment to making money as well as having fun. We have other pointsof transparency via job descriptions, salary ranges, and so on. A phrase commonlyused around here is: Treat People Like Grown-Ups. We know from working withrecruiters that in other places information is controlled. Here it is transparent.


    With regard to training, we live the promise. We manage it and worry aboutit. We really do listen to input from employees and adjust programs to makesure we are getting the training we want. A minimum of thirty hours per personper year is required, and a training stipend is given to each person. Thosewho don’t use it are spoken to. Our approach to training has evolved, but itis at the core of our culture. We don’t cancel training if profits are down.


    There is an approval process to make sure the training we do is appropriate,but we interpret that liberally. For example, we have even approved acting lessonsto help someone improve presentation skills and provided voice training forthe same purpose.


    We want people to manage their work and clients around their training. We mustbe able to say to a client, “So-and-so can’t come to your meeting becauseshe has training scheduled.” Most clients accept (and even approve of)this.


    We are big on self-responsibility. We once had a problem with people not showingup to an outside training course for which the firm had prepaid. We asked theemployees what to do about this. They decided that if an employee didn’t showup, part of their stipend would go to pay for it.


    This isn’t meant to be punitive, but self-correcting, and is part of the grown-upenvironment we strive for. It means a sense of responsibility to the firm andto themselves to grow their role here. There is no spoon-feeding. We expectpeople to step up to the plate, and fix their problems without waiting for someoneto tell them to do it. We hire people who know how to take responsibility. Peoplefeel they are in control of where they are going client-wise and career-wise.


    We try to minimize politics. We discourage gossip, whining, complaining. Thereis not a lot of idle chatter here. There’s a lot of “Why?” We willstop the engines to fix things. When we can’t fix something, we are open withpeople about this as well. We are diligent in keeping promises, because it isa violation of trust if we don’t.


    Staff development is a huge part of our client service, since the client isgetting highly skilled people. A client once said “We don’t want your Ateam, they will excel before we do. Can we have the B or C team instead?”We didn’t get that job (and frankly we didn’t want it) because we build ourpitches around a “we are the best” attitude and if the client doesn’twant that or can’t work that way, then it is best we don’t work with the client.


    We have an annual client survey and we consistently have at least one face-to-facewith each client every year. For an individual client, we have the team fillout the same form. We have a feedback session with the staff afterwards. Themanagers take the results back to the team to report what is being done well,what done badly. The document then goes back to the client and we make a commitmentto the client, identifying problems and developing an action plan to fix things.The whole team is involved in how to fix things.


    Survey results are combined and given to the management team to show overallwhat the positives and negatives are. We publish aggregated client feedbackresults internally, and bonuses are influenced by client feedback results. Wehave regular reviews where each team has to write up three things that keepthem awake at night about their client.


    Then we have “The Doctor Is In” sessions. Any team can bring in atechnical or client problem they are having. For each problem the “doctors”(three senior managers who have had special sensitivity training as facilitators)then spend 15 minutes doing fast brainstorming of ideas.


    Our management acts as a team. Things are brainstormed, decisions are madecollectively and everything is put out on the table. This style transfers tothe employees. There are no politics here. Everyone cares as much about everyoneelse’s group. We see goals as collective; no egos allowed. Politicking wouldn’tbe tolerated.


    We have no room for people who want to cruise because both peers and managerswould be troubled by it. Sometimes you have to actually tell someone, “Youhave to contribute some ideas around here to move ahead.” Usually, peoplerealize they are not pulling their weight, and they say “OK” and change.On the other hand, we have different ways of rewarding people, like spot bonuses.


    In the past, people who left the firm were treated as pariahs. Bad treatmentof those leaving had a hugely negative impact on those who stayed. It was likea double standard. If you were leaving, all of a sudden you were treated asless than a human. People realized that if they were to leave too they wouldget that treatment from “their firm” as well.


    That part of our culture has changed. Now we treat people who leave respectfullyand with appreciation for what they have done for our firm. We have goodbyeparties, sending people away respectfully, with their contributions highlighted.The result is that we have former employees who actually want to come back.


    There are no surprises here for the employee. We are articulate in saying,”This is what we stand for and this what you get.” We practice whatwe preach. We stick to our guns, and there is no wishy-washy management behavior.We are disciplined about standards, although we are open to reasons why theymay not be met.


    It takes emotional courage to be a good and improving manager. Even if it isintellectually obvious what has to be done, it is still hard to do it. It isabout respect, trust, empowerment, confidence, loyalty, keeping promises. It’sabout having a certain type of character, having principles and sticking tothem. We have learned that sticking to your principles has a tight correlationwith profitability. Ethics have to the bedrock that you start from.

Now we hear fromNorthport’s middle-level group. Those who volunteered to talk were representativeof a variety of departments and were all at a junior level with exception ofone newly hired VP. Here’s what they had to say:

The middle-level group:
    What is being done here that causes positive results?People are willing and eager to stay at work, due both to a great corporateculture and to a sense of community.


    Around here, you are required to respect your colleagues and be cordial. Ifyou are “snappish” with someone, you have to apologize to him or her,whether he or she is a more senior or a lower level person. If people don’ttreat others with respect, they are discharged, no matter how senior or successful.


    It’s different in other firms. Some even allow people to scream at the staff,using obscene language, which we would never accept! Management has also resignedclients who do no show respectful treatment to us.


    Our rule is “Give respect and you will get it.” You hear “Thankyous” every day. Management knows that in today’s environment any of uscan go somewhere else at any time (and probably for more money). They show appreciation,not just with money, but in small ways like sharing between teams and e-mail”thank yous.”


     Management lets us be the best judge of our own priorities. We respect everyone’sideas and values. We listen to everyone. We don’t give people the brush-offbecause they are at a different level. Everyone brings expertise to the table,and you must be able to identify and use that expertise.


    We are a tight community here. We play hard and work hard. It provides a funenvironment to a stressful occupation. You must take the time to interact socially,even if just in the hallway.


    There is more freedom here than other places. There is flexibility here aboutwhat you want, what you want to work on and what your personal issues are. Whateveryou are doing or what is going on, you’ll be listened to!


    We have a willingness to let someone young take on a job and be responsible.Age doesn’t matter. Management asks for feedback from all levels of people ona regular basis, whether it’s a dinner menu or a client program. They createtask forces for all changes in the firm.


    For example, when we moved office space, everyone’s opinion was sought out.Everyone feels free to say, “this is not going to work,” no matterwhat level you are at. Most importantly, we can see how feedback changes thingshere. You know management is listening.


    We have constant innovation and change. There is no “This is how it’sbeen done here!” There’s always a chance to break new ground. We push tobe on the leading edge, always trying to do something else, always buildingon what works. There’s always a risk here and that is motivating. It would behard for a cruiser to fit in here because the review process is always about”Where do you want to go next? What are the resources that you need?”


    Management is trusted because they are available. Managers support and backup their staff and the staff’s decisions. They are willing to confront the clienton our behalf. They understand that employees are looking for help from managersin growing their career.


    Personal life is respected. If you work late, they understand that you willbe in late the next day. Teams that are overbooked are told not to pursue newbusiness. Clear workload and revenue targets exist but there are no browniepoints for exceeding them. Our top manager once told us, “Profitabilityis too high, and it shows we are working too hard.” That had a big impact!


    There is clearly a commitment to the development of staff. Management understandsyou may not be here forever but they want to make sure you have skills. We thinkthis is very noble.


    The head of the office is real and honorable. She is not soft; she just doesn’tput walls between people. What you see is what you get. You see the real personall of the time. She is, however, also a “let’s get down to business”person and can be hard-nosed.


    It’s the little things. On your anniversary of your time with the firm, youget a note from her — handwritten. People actually post her notes on theirwalls. She knows everyone’s name. When you first come in you have tea with herand talk about yourself. She is personally involved with the staff.


    What do we do differently on the client side? Reasonable deadlines are givento clients. This is very much appreciated by the staff, and it makes for a betterquality of work.


    We tell clients we have a whole team and everyone is important and can answertheir questions. This is good for the clients, because they know who is doingtheir work and that their questions will be addressed promptly. We also believethat whoever pitches the work also does the work. That is not necessarily thecase in other places.


    Recently, one of us didn’t want to work on a specific account which concernedgun advocacy. He would have to do work for something he didn’t believe in, andit upset him. Management agreed they didn’t believe in the message and thereforecouldn’t service the account properly, so they resigned the account. We believeyou must believe in what you are doing.


    Creativity here is second to none. If someone from another department has anidea, they are welcome to join our brainstorm sessions. We make a lot of useof cross-boundary teams.


    We use the right staff levels for accounts and billing. Our upper rate isn’tcharged if someone from lower level can do work. We play fair with the clients,and they know it. They can see it.


    Pitches (new business proposals) are sold on the basis of relationships. Youwant to like the people you are pitching the program to, and you want them tolike you, not just the work. Winning business is about relationships, aboutwho the client will trust.


    This is a nice environment to work in and that is why many nice people arehere. This image transcends to clients with whom some relationships have beenas long as twenty-seven years. Our people have gone on site and actually workedtemporarily for the client company, while still in our employ. We think it showsthe client’s respect for us.


    Face-to-face client reviews are done annually. This allows open integrity andrespect. The results of client feedback help you know how you are doing andhelp you to do your job.


    Bonuses are tied to what you are doing, and are more frequent rather than annual.They are tied to something concrete and specific, so you can understand whyyou got it.


    What is one thing we could improve on? Salaries should be brought up to industrystandards. Everyone knows that if you leave you can get 15 to 20 percent moresomewhere else. We are happy to be here but happiness doesn’t pay the bills.However, management isn’t ignoring this problem, so that helps to make peoplewant to stay.


    We are two hundred people here now and we don’t want the firm to get any bigger.They do a lot to keep you in the loop here and they don’t want to lose the family-likeatmosphere, which can happen when you get bigger.


My initial reactions:
    I walked away from these interviews with one word ringingin my brain: “Wow!” Here’s a group of people who know exactly whatthey’re doing and how to do it. Did you notice that terrific phrase? “Theright combination of fun and discipline.” That’s one to remember.


    The fun stuff is real and pervasive here: book clubs, have a giggle, theme-decoratedmeetings. And, notice, it’s not just fun periodically at the annual retreator office meeting. It’s fun embedded in how they conduct their business. Butlet’s also not ignore the discipline. Managers don’t get their bonuses if theydon’t do performance reviews? That’s tough! (And courageous and brilliant!)


    Most firms today have client feedback of one sort or another, but how manytake as disciplined an approach as this office? Full debriefings, share theresult with all of the team, and make public commitments to the client abouthow you are going to follow up! Now, that’s discipline! That’s courage! That’spracticing what you preach!


    Finally, note that the concern about not getting too big exists at this 200-personoperation. Everyonethinks you have to be small to sustain a culture, but maybe it’s not a requirement.


Reprinted with permissionfrom PracticeWhat You Preach by David H. Maister, The Free Press, 2001.

Posted on August 7, 2001July 10, 2018

A Little Shut-Eye, a Lot of Efficiency

Zzzzzzzzzzzzz. That’s the sound of employees sleeping on the job. Far from beingoffended by it, some companies approve and even actively encourage workplacenapping.


At Gould Evans Goodman Associates, employees doze in”spent tents” in a fairly secluded second-floor loft space. Each ofthe two circular tents at the Kansas City architectural firm has an air mattress,sleeping bag, flannel pillow, alarm clock, eye covering, and headphones forlistening to relaxing music.


At the 500-employee Yarde Metals, the sleep-deprivedin the Pennsylvania and New Hampshire branches use specially outfitted nap rooms.The primary and secondary metal manufacturer will feature eight napping/meetingrooms at its new Southington, Connecticut, headquarters.


These firms and dozens of others are discovering thebenefits of workplace napping. While some napping policies are rooted in healthconcerns and in
offering employees a perk, companies are also touting productivity advantages.That’s because rested workers are more alert, in a better mood, and concentratebetter. All of this contributes to enhanced morale, communication, teamwork,and even performance, says William A. Anthony, author of TheArt of Napping at Work (Larson Publications, 1999).


Still, snoozing at work is viewed as a dirty littlesecret, notes Anthony, director of Boston University’s Center for PsychiatricRehabilitation. He and his wife, Camille, conducted a survey in which 70 percentof more than 1,000 respondents said that they nap at work. “They’re nappingfor 5 to 10 minutes at their desk, in the car, bathroom, or a locked room,”Anthony says, “and they’re doing that because they get a benefit from it.”He advocates dozing during work and lunch breaks, and is so sold on the benefitsof napping that he’s launched an annual Workplace Napping Day on April 1.


Not everyone, of course, is surprised that employeesare snoozing at work. According to a recent National Sleep Foundation surveyof 1,004 Americans, adults sleep an average of seven hours a night on weekdays,an hour less than experts recommend. Further, the survey revealed that 40 percentof adults acknowledge that sleepiness impairs daily activities.


After an executive was seen slumped at his desk, exhaustedfrom working long hours, Gould Evans installed its 10-by-12-foot nap room. Accordingto company spokesperson Mindy Highfill, no stigma is attached to those usingit. “When it’s the middle of the afternoon and I’m not getting work donebecause I’m tired, I know I’m better off taking a 10- or 15-minute nap,”she says. “Then, when I go back to work, I’m refreshed and revitalizedand able to get a lot more done.”


At Yarde Metals, napping rooms are just one of manyperks. The $159 million company, which practices open-book management and featuresprofit sharing, plans to include partial child care, dog kennels, freshly roastedcoffee, fitness and massage areas, and other amenities at all its facilities.


“We can’t say directly that allowing napping increasessales, but we can say without question that napping contributes to highersales, earnings, productivity, and efficiency,” says company presidentCraig Yarde, who notes that the firm has “almost zero turnover.”


He dismisses critics who contend that employees willabuse the napping privilege. Yarde believes that the benefits gained by demonstratingtrust in employees far outweigh any disadvantages. “The publicity we’vereceived from around the world about napping and other things indicates we havea good place to work, that people trust each other, they get paid well whenthey work hard, and that they have fun.”


Workforce, August 2001, p. 17 — SubscribeNow!

Posted on August 7, 2001July 10, 2018

What Works When Fear Strikes the Workplace

Did you see all those rats?”


    My friend John had just watched a new TV show calledFear Factor. In it, contestants face a series of nerve-rattling, stomach-turningactivities. The one person who can hack it walks off with $50,000.


    John couldn’t get over the rat scene. “Each persongot strapped in a pit and had to stay there for four minutes with hundreds ofcrawling, nibbling rats. It was terrible.” He started laughing nervously.


    “That’s how I feel when I’m at work, like I’min a rat pit,” he said. “It’s that scary.”


    Over the years, John has told me all about the organizationwhere he works. It’s a market-research firm known for its high-IQ workforce,but among insiders, it’s seen as a place where threats and punishment are routinelyused by managers to “get things done.”


    There was the time John got scolded, grade-school style,for taking a devil’s advocate look at the boss’s suggested methodology for anupcoming project. There was the time he and several coworkers got a month ofsilent treatment from their manager after collaborating with people on anotherproject team. There was the time they were told to meet an outlandish deadline,”or else.” There was the time — well, let’s just say there have beenlots of times.


    John has way too much company. In my ongoing focusgroups and informal conversations, I hear countless stories about fear-filledworkplaces.


    One person called his boss Freddy — as in Freddy Krueger,from A Nightmare on Elm Street. Mr. Krueger had slashed his way to a seniormanagement position, and he used his new authority to stick his least-favoriteemployees with dead-end assignments. When people saw the boss approaching, theywould announce, “He’s baaaack.” It was their one way to lighten upan otherwise oppressive situation.


    Another person described the fear in her workplaceby quoting from Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Raven.” She and her colleaguesdid their best to keep away from several key (and apparently raven-like) managers.It was a closed-door culture. Suddenly there came a tapping . . . at my chamberdoor. . . .I stood there, wondering, fearing, doubting . . .


    This is no way to have a totally engaged and productiveworkforce, that’s for sure.


    According to the American Institute of Stress, 40 percentof worker turnover is the result of job stress, and some one million workersare absent each workday because of stress-related complaints. Sure, some ofthe stress is unrelated to work or workplace fear, but cut these numbers inhalf and they’re still staggering.


    Psychologists have long known the impact of positiveand negative “affect,” or mood. A positive affect has been shown topump up creativity, while a negative affect stifles it and leads to mistrust,cynicism, isolation, and competition. Not exactly the stuff we want in our high-performanceorganizations, is it?


    Fear also writes its own version of reality. At data-drivencompanies where fear runs rampant, spreadsheets routinely get tweaked and twistedinto “acceptable” shape. I’ve heard all about this in my interviewswith well-meaning people who will do just about anything to escape the boss’swrath.


    So how do you stamp out fear?


    Well, first let’s come to grips with reality. Thereare some fear-mongering types who are awfully hard to work with no matter whatyou do. The best approach is to try to understand why they are that way, anduse any insights from this to manage the relationship accordingly.


    A bit of empathy, for example, can go a long way. Ifthe boss is under chronic deadline pressure and you are too, perhaps you cancommiserate. If you’re both frustrated with edicts from on high, again, tryventing together. This isn’t about coddling or caving in; it’s about findingcommon ground.


    If you think the fear relates to a lack of communication– say, you and your colleagues are fearful of some impending and unspoken change,or you’re concerned about certain goals and fear the consequences of fallingshort — open a dialogue with a manager who likely knows the scoop. You’ll haveto initiate it, and it might feel as comfortable as an emergency visit to thedentist. But the right questions might yield information that allays fears,and again, you might achieve some common ground. Ideally, try to make the dialoguean ongoing process.


    This is especially important when rumors are swirlingaround the organization. We’ve all played that grade-school game where someonesecretly decides on a phrase and whispers it to the next person, and the next,and the next. Reality gets pretty distorted, doesn’t it? Don’t settle for thelatest version of the story. Approach people who might know the facts, and aska few questions to get at the truth.


    Managers have to be especially mindful of what theirverbal and nonverbal messages are saying. If key managers declare a strong commitmentto work/life balance, yet the only people being promoted are those who workendless hours, there’s liable to be a low-grade fear among people who don’t.Don’t cover up reality with misleading rhetoric, just because you think it’swhat people want to hear.


    When analyzing problems, developing ideas and improvements,and making decisions, involve more people. There’s no better way to preventunfounded fears. Co-creators can become a sort of “truth squad.”


    Last, the most challenging of all: Look at how yourorganization is ultimately managed. Is there a quest for control based on allsorts of rules and decrees? Do managers play “gotcha” with employees,eagerly catching them when a rule is broken? Are performance evaluations andpromotions used to reward people who are simply good at pleasing the boss? Andare you doing any of these things?


    If so, heed these words from Edmund Burke: “Nopassion so effectively robs the mind of all its powers of acting and reasoningas does fear.”


Workforce, August 2001, pp.— SubscribeNow!


Other columns by Tom:

  • An Ageless Question from Kindergarten
  • The Blossoming of a Workplace Drone
  • In Praise of Workplace Cynicism
  • Is Boss a Four-Letter Word?
  • Competition: As American as Apple Pie?
Posted on August 5, 2001July 10, 2018

HR Intern Checklist

Afaculty internship can result in great benefits for both the company and the intern, but planning is essential. Here are some tips:

  • Meet with the faculty intern ahead of time and compile a list of benefits to everyone involved. “There should be a statement of work so both parties’ expectations are at the same level,” says Jim Snyder of BWXT Y-12 (formerly Lockheed Martin Energy Systems). “Everyone should know what you hope to accomplish so at the end there are no surprises.”

  • Agree on specific projects. “Try very hard to have specific projects in mind,” says Tom Zimmerman, formerly senior vice president at MYCOM, a Cincinnati e-business and communications company. “Don’t leave the person on their own to ‘find work’ or ‘make work,’ but also give them sufficient flexibility to look around at different aspects of the operation and learn whatever they deem appropriate.”

  • Have the faculty member sign a nondisclosure agreement if he or she will have access to company secrets.

  • Be flexible in scheduling. Working around the schedules of faculty members can be trickier than for those of students, especially if a project extends beyond the summer.

  • Explain the benefits of a faculty internship to employees. “You have some internal selling to do with different areas of your company,” says SCANA’s Cathy Love. “It takes time to make this a valuable experience for teachers.”

  • Check with faculty interns frequently to make sure they’re not encountering any obstacles.

  • Conduct an exit interview to solicit suggestions from the intern.

  • Stay in touch. “If you open a door, if it’s appropriate, it’s nice to keep the door open,” Snyder says.

Workforce, August 2001, p. 38 — Subscribe Now!

Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress