Skip to content

Workforce

Category: Archive

Posted on May 25, 1999July 10, 2018

Plans Differ in Cost, Coverage and Convenience

What are your choices for health care plans these days? Most are familiar, but at least one is new. Here are the primary characteristics of each:


Health maintenance organizations (HMOs):
These plans offer a predetermined set of benefits for a fixed cost to the employer. They usually emphasize preventive care, and frequently there are minimal or no co-payments and no deductibles. Because the HMO absorbs the costs of any treatment that exceeds the premium, some employees may associate HMOs with media stories about refusal to cover a particular costly treatment. There are excellent HMOs and poor ones. Ask colleagues about their experiences.


Managed care:
According to the Health Insurance Association of America in Washington, D.C., 70 percent of Americans whose health coverage is through their employer are enrolled in managed care. The attraction for employers is that managed care allows employers to control costs far more effectively than in indemnity plans, where employees can see any doctor they wish. In managed care, each enrollee typically is assigned to a primary care physician who becomes the gatekeeper to all specialists in the plan. In a managed care plan, the employer contracts with selected providers for a comprehensive set of services to enrollees. Enrollees have financial incentives to use the providers covered by the plan. HMOs can be considered as managed care if there is a provider that decides which specialists a patient sees. PPOs usually aren’t considered as managed care-partcipants go straight to a specialist instead of through a primary care provider.


Preferred provider organizations (PPOs):
These are groups of hospitals and providers who form an organization and contract with employers to provide health care at a discounted fee. Employees enjoy that fee only when they obtain services from a PPO member provider or hospital.


Point of service plans (POSs, also known as fee for service):
Employees who select these plans want the full range of choice of providers and hospitals. Usually the employee is responsible for a deductible and a co-payment. Point of service plans are the most expensive option in health care plans. Often, if a group of employees insists on a POS option among the plan choices, the premium the employee pays is much higher than the premium for an HMO, managed care or PPO option.


Physician practice management companies (PPMCs):
This is the new kid on the block, created by health care providers who dislike the constraints on them in other types of plans. According to Davis Fansler, San Francisco-based consultant to Towers Perrin in New York City, PPMCs are building their strategies to become fully integrated medical groups that deliver care more cost effectively. They’re still in the capacity-building stage, but their goals include marketing services directly to employers.


Workforce, January 1999, Vol. 78, No. 1, p. 90.


Posted on May 25, 1999July 10, 2018

Health Care Help Is Out There

Health care coverage options are tricky. Luckily, there are plenty of resources available to help. Below are a few.


State Insurance Commissioner’s Office:
Contact this office for lists of mandated benefits in your state.


Benefits consultants:
They can help you navigate available health care plans. Among the best known are William M. Mercer Inc., Towers Perrin, and KMPG Peat Marwick. An especially helpful tool is William M. Mercer’s “International Benefit Guidelines,” an annual report on insurance practices worldwide, sorted by country. The study can be found at Mercer’s Web site in the “Resource Center” under the “Publications” listing.


Chamber of Commerce:
Especially for small businesses, the local Chamber often has groups of employers who’ve been through similar experiences.


Health Insurance Plans of California (HIPC):
HIPC is a coalition of insurers that gives Community Partners employees a choice of 12 to 15 HMOs and a POS (point-of-service) option. Call 800/HIPC-YES (800/447-2937).


Health Insurance Association of America (HIAA):
This organization’s Web site provides HIAA booklets. Go to Consumer Information. Call 202/785-3910 for copies, or print them from the Web site.


HIAA also recommends these sources of information:


Managed Care: An AARP Guide
American Association of Retired Persons, Washington, D.C., 202/434-2277


Choosing Quality: Finding the Health Plan That’s Right for You
National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, D.C., 800/839-6487


Consumer Coalition for Quality Health Care
Washington, D.C., 202/789-3606


Workforce, January 1999, Vol. 78, No. 1, p. 86.


Posted on May 25, 1999July 10, 2018

Search Engines that Save Your Company Time

Here are some search engines, some not as well-known, that you can use to save research time and money for your organization.


www.dejanews.com
Searches online news groups, forums, etc.


www.liszt.com
Searches for listservs (mass e-mail groups) on hundreds of subjects. For example, if you are doing research on relocation, you could see if there is a relocation listserv.


www.reference.com
Searches forums and mailing lists.


www.corporateinformation.com
Massive search mechanism of companies in the U.S. and ’round the world.


www.companysleuth.com
You put in a list of companies you want to track (i.e. Oracle, Disney, Manpower, USWeb, etc.) and it sends you e-mail updates on what’s going on with that company.


nt.excite.com(no www)
Searches news articles.


SOURCE: Todd Raphael, Workforce Online, April 1, 1999.

Posted on May 25, 1999July 10, 2018

Disclosing Retirement Plan Enhancements

Issue:
As benefits manager, you have spent the last year researching, analyzing and designing a new retirement plan option for your company. For many employees, this new option would provide for greater benefits than those currently available.


On April 5, your proposal was presented to the senior management team. It was determined that with a few adjustments, the new retirement option will be fully implemented and available to employees retiring on or after August 1.


Several employees are considering retirement within the next several months, and knowledge of the new plan option may affect their retirement decisions. Must you disclose the details of the pending plan to them, if asked?


Answer:
Yes. If an employer gives “serious consideration” to a plan change, the employer has a fiduciary duty under ERISA not to make any intentional or negligent misrepresentations. In addition, employers may have a further duty to correct any misleading information in summary plan descriptions as to which benefit options might be financially advantageous for potential participants.


What constitutes serious consideration?
Serious consideration exists when the following three criteria are met:


  • a specific proposal;
  • discussed by senior management with the authority to implement the changes;
  • for purposes of implementation.

Consideration becomes serious when the subject turns to the practicalities of implementation.


Preliminary steps excluded.
Serious consideration does not include the preliminary steps an employer may take in designing or redesigning a plan, including:


  • Gathering data and formulating strategies;
  • Ordering an analysis of benefits alternatives;
  • Commissioning studies;
  • Interacting with upper level management or outside consultants regarding possible plan designs; or
  • Engaging in other discussions regarding plan design that fall within the normal course of duties.

Advice to managers


  • Once serious consideration is given internally to an action or decision regarding a benefit plan, make sure that information is communicated honestly and forthrightly to those that inquire about it.
  • Companies choosing not to disclose plan changes until they are finalized should make eligibility for plan participation retroactive to the date of serious consideration.
  • Develop a thorough communication strategy.

Cite: McAuley v. International Business Machines Corp. (6thCir, 1999) Dkt. No. 97-6091.


SOURCE: CCH Incorporated is a leading provider of information and software for human resources, legal, accounting, health care and small business professionals. CCH offers human resource management, payroll, employment, benefits, and worker safety products and publications in print, CD, online, and via the Internet.

Posted on May 24, 1999July 10, 2018

Can You Use Genetic Testing Information

Issue:
As a routine matter, you review your company’s employment application annually. As you read the section on genetic information, you wonder if you can continue to ask whether applicants have undergone genetic testing and what the results are, or whether they would be willing to undergo genetic testing. You remember reading in an industry newsletter that some states are now prohibiting discrimination based on genetic information. Should you request a revision to your employment application?


Answer:
The answer depends on which states are involved. A growing number of states (21) have laws on the books (as of April 1999) limiting the use of genetic information in the workplace. Among those 21 states, some permit inquiries and testing, under narrow circumstances, for susceptibility to potentially toxic chemicals and substances in the workplace. Most states prohibit discrimination and employment decisions based on genetic information. Currently, there is no federal law governing the use of genetic testing and genetic information in the workplace.


What does your state require?
Briefly, these are the rules in the states having genetic information protection laws:


Arizona employers may not consider genetic test results when making employment decisions. Ariz RevStatAnn, Sec 41-1463.


California prohibits employment discrimination based on medical conditions, including genetic characteristics. Cal GovernmentCode, Sec 12926.


Connecticut prohibits employment discrimination based on genetic information and prohibits employers from requesting genetic information from employees or job applicants. Conn GenStat, Sec 46a-60(a)(11).


Delaware prohibits employers from intentionally collecting genetic information from employees, job applicants or family members of employees or job applicants, unless the employer can show that the information is consistent with business necessity or is related to the employer’s retirement policy or administration of an employee welfare or benefit plan. Del CodeAnn, Sec 711(e).


Florida allows employers to have DNA analysis performed with the informed consent of the person to be tested. (DNA analysis includes genetic testing.) If DNA or genetic information is used in any employment decision that results in adverse action, the test must be repeated to verify the accuracy of the first analysis. Fla Stat, Sec 760.40.


Illinois requires that genetic testing information be treated in a manner that is consistent with federal law, including the ADA. The law particularly outlines to whom the results of genetic testing may be disclosed. 410 ILCS 513/1 through 513/45.


Iowa employers may not require or administer genetic testing as a condition of employment or affect the terms, conditions or privileges of employment of anyone who obtains a genetic test. Employees, however, may give written consent to genetic testing to determine their susceptibility to potentially toxic chemicals or substances in the workplace, so long as the employer does not take any action that adversely affects the person’s employment based on the resulting genetic information. Iowa Code, Sec 729.6.


Kansas employers may not seek to obtain or use genetic screening or testing information of an employee or prospective employee to distinguish, discriminate, or restrict any right or benefit otherwise available to an employee or prospective employee. Also, employers may not subject employees or prospective employees to any genetic screening or test. KSA Sec 44-1009.


Maine employers may not discriminate against employees or job applicants on the basis of genetic information, refusal to submit to genetic testing, refusal to make available the results of genetic testing or because an individual has undergone genetic testing or genetic counseling, except when based on a bona fide occupational qualification. 5 MRSA 19302.


Missouri employers may not discriminate against employees or prospective employees based on genetic information. The restriction does not prohibit genetic testing with the written permission of the employee or job applicant or the use of genetic information that is directly related to the person’s ability to perform an assigned job. Mo RevStat, Sec 595.105.


New Hampshire employers may not require genetic testing as a condition of employment and may not make employment decisions based on genetic information. Employees may request genetic testing in writing and with informed consent to investigate a workers’ compensation claim or to determine the employee’s susceptibility or level of exposure to potentially toxic substances in the workplace. Employers, however, may not use this information in making employment decisions. NH RevStatAnn, Ch 141-H:3.


New Jersey employers may not discriminate against employees or job applicants on the basis of genetic information, a refusal to submit to genetic testing or refusal to make available the results of genetic testing. NJ RevStat, Secs 10:5-5 and 10:5-12.


New Mexico prohibits the collection and retention of genetic information without the informed, written consent of the employee or the employee’s representative. MN StatAnn, Sec 24-21-3.


New York employers may not make genetic testing or the providing of genetic information a condition of employment, unless a specific genetic test is directly related to the occupational environment. Employees may request genetic testing, but results may not be used by employers to take adverse employment action. NY HumanRightsLaw, Sec 296(19).


North Carolina employers may not discriminate against employees or job applicants who request genetic testing or counseling services or on the basis of genetic information about an employee or an employee’s family member. NC GenStat, Sec 95-28.1A.


Oklahoma employers may not discriminate against employees or job applicants based on genetic information, except in the determination of insurance benefits. Okla Stat, 3614.1.


Oregon employers may not obtain or use genetic information to discriminate against employees or job applicants, unless the employee or job applicant consents to testing to determine a bona fide occupational qualification. Ore RevStat, Sec 659.036.


Rhode Island employers may not make genetic testing a condition of employment and may not discriminate against employees or job applicants based on genetic information. RI GenLaws, Sec 28-6.7-1.


Texas employers may not condition employment decisions on genetic information or on a refusal to submit to genetic testing. Tex LaborCode, Sec 21.402.


Vermont employers may not discriminate against employees or job applicants on the basis of genetic information. 18 VSA 9333.


Wisconsin employers may not require genetic testing as a condition of employment or discriminate against employees who undergo genetic testing. Employees may request genetic testing in writing for the investigation of a workers’ compensation claim or for determining the employee’s susceptibility to potentially toxic chemicals or substances in the workplace. Employers may not use the requested information to make any adverse employment decisions. Wisc Stat, Secs 111.37(7m) and 111.372.


Source: CCH Incorporated is a leading provider of information and software for human resources, legal, accounting, health care and small business professionals. CCH offers human resource management, payroll, employment, benefits, and worker safety products and publications in print, CD, online, and via the Internet.

Posted on May 21, 1999July 10, 2018

Workplace Solutions to Common and Uncommon ADA Issues

As plaintiffs become more creative in bringing claims under the ADA, employers must respond with increasingly novel workplace accommodations. The following list details some interesting workplace ADA solutions.


Issue:
An employee with a disability is unable to perform certain marginal functions of her job, yet none of her coworkers has any free time to handle these responsibilities. How can an employer solve this problem without hiring another employee?


Solution:
Switch the marginal functions of two or more employees in order to accommodate the employee with a disability. First, identify marginal functions currently being performed by one or more coworkers that the employee in question is qualified to perform. Then, switch the assignment of these marginal functions to the employee with a disability.


Issue:
A bakery worker with mental retardation had trouble placing cookie dough on baking sheets by precise numbers and patterns. How did the employer respond?


Solution:
A plastic template was made for the sheets, with holes indicating the precise placing patterns, so that the employee was able to perform the job.


Issue:


An employer is faced with choosing between an applicant with a disability and a more qualified nondisabled applicant. What should the employer do?


Solution:
Employers are not required to give preference to an applicant with a disability over more qualified nondisabled applicants. Employers are free to select the most qualified applicant available and to make decisions based on reasons unrelated to the existence or consequence of a disability.


Issue:
A receptionist, who was blind, could not see the lights on her telephone, which indicated whether the telephone lines were ringing, on hold, or in use at her company. What course of action was taken?


Solution:
A light-probe (a pen-like device that detected a lighted button) was purchased. Cost: $45.


Issue:
A medical technician who was deaf could not hear the buzz of a timer, which was necessary for specific laboratory tests. How did the employer respond?


Solution:
An indicator light was attached to the timer. Cost: $27.


Issue:
An individual with dyslexia who worked as a police officer spent hours filling out forms at the end of each day. What did the employer do?


Solution:
The officer was provided with a tape recorder and a secretary typed his reports from dictation rather than from his handwritten reports. Cost: $69.


SOURCE: CCH Incorporated is a leading provider of information and software for human resources, legal, accounting, health care and small business professionals. CCH offers human resource management, payroll, employment, benefits, and worker safety products and publications in print, CD, online, and via the Internet. For more information and other updates on the latest HR news, check our Web site at http://hr.cch.com/.

Posted on May 21, 1999July 10, 2018

MBA Programs Making the Big Decision

If you’re seriously considering an MBA program, there are myriad factors to consider. Here’s quick checklist of issues to discuss with your business and HR colleagues, academicians, your close friends—and family.


  • What are your long-term professional goals?
  • Do you want to remain in the HR field?
  • How could an MBA improve your professional standing in HR?
  • Would an MBA increase your credibility with your current employer?
  • Would your current employer support your academic endeavor? How?
  • Which MBA programs seem to integrate HR into their business philosophies?
  • Will the core business courses offer you knowledge that you currently don’t possess?
  • Is the program accredited?
  • Is the program respected by the business community?
  • Is the program designed to encourage a team-based environment?
  • Is the faculty’s expertise well rounded and aligned with today’s business needs?
  • Has the academic institution established corporate partnerships?
  • Will the program offer experiential learning?
  • Is the cost of the MBA program affordable?
  • Is the program designed for part-time students?

Workforce, May 1999, Vol. 78, No. 5, p. 82.


Posted on May 21, 1999July 10, 2018

Eight Myths of HRMS Software (IV of IV)

Eight Myths of HRMS Software (IV of IV)


Myth #7:


HR Software requires constant IS involvement
Some HRMS software may require constant IS involvement, but a well-designed and well-implemented product should not. If you are not getting constant IS involvement with your system now (manual or automated), you should not need it with a new automated system, unless of course, the software is poorly designed, poorly conceived, and/or poorly implemented.


Myth #8:


Getting Technical Support is a problem with HRMS Software
There are endless horror stories about lengthy delays for returned calls, inexperienced support reps, voice mail, and of course, program errors (i.e. bugs). Well-designed software minimizes the need for technical support, but there is never, ever a replacement for the human touch. Well-trained reps can answer questions quickly and refer software problems to the development staff for speedy resolution.


During the purchase process, you can determine the quality of support you are going to receive by demo-ing not only the software but also the technical support. Given that everyone is at their best before a sale, you can safely assume that if pre-sales efforts are weak, post sales efforts will be weaker.


SOURCE: Jim Witschger, “HRMS Software—Myths and Reality,” March 1999. http://www.people-trak.com


Want more information on HR Technology? Search the Workforce Online Research Center, or click here to find out about the June IHRIM conference in Salt Lake City.

Posted on May 21, 1999July 10, 2018

Planning is Key to Call Center Success

Building a call center requires a tightly focused strategy. In the end, it’s one part technology, one part cultural change—always with the focus on improving customer service. By resolving each transaction as efficiently as possible, and providing convenience for workers, it’s possible for everyone to come out ahead. Here’s how to build the framework for an effective call center.


Does a call center make sense for your organization?
A call center isn’t appropriate for every HR department at every company. Organizations with more than 10,000 employees benefit the most, although a call center—or at least the same communication model—can prove beneficial for medium and small companies.


Determine what functions are best supported by a call center—and what’s needed for a particular organization. In most cases, flexible benefits enrollment, payroll, and pension and 401(k) administration top the list. “It’s usually best to roll out various capabilities over a period of time,” says David Link, a practice director for The Hunter Group, a Baltimore-based information management consulting firm.


Examine your current computing and telephony environment to understand your equipment needs.
Call centers almost always require connections between various computer systems—sometimes across platforms and operating systems. At many large companies, mainframes, Unix and NT servers must interact in order to make CTI, ACD and IVR a reality.


Seamless database integration also is a necessity. The hardware and software a company uses affects what call center tools, products and functionality it can use to solve specific business challenges. For example, when Benton Harbor, Michigan-based Whirlpool Corp.’s HR team began assembling an HR call center and implementing benefits administration in February 1997, it originally leaned toward purchasing a Lucent interactive voice response system to run off an existing Lucent automatic call distribution system.


Although the package offered a price advantage over other products on the market, Whirlpool’s HR people opted to use a TALX IVR. “We paid more money for the system, but we had the specific tools and a complementary PeopleSoft system already in place,” explains Shirley Pantelleria, director of the employee services center.


Don’t overbuild.
“Sometimes people look at a call center solution as a complex equation, when all that’s needed is a simple hotline,” says Jim Spoor, president and CEO of SPECTRUM Human Resources Corp., an HRMS vendor based in Denver.


Indeed, large corporations with geographically dispersed workers benefit the most from a call center. Many find they can cut administrative costs by 20 to 40 percent while boosting customer satisfaction. But it’s often not necessary to build a state-of-the-art facility—particularly for medium and small firms. “The key,” says Spoor, “is connecting the technology with the organizational needs.”


Design the call center to complement employee self-service.
Today’s technology makes it easy for an individual to update information and process transactions by calling into an IVR or logging on to an intranet. “A customer service or call center representative isn’t needed to handle the vast majority of transactions,” explains Tod Loofbourrow, president and CEO of Foundation Technologies, a Waltham, Massachusetts, producer of software for call centers. In fact, guiding employees toward self-service rather than human interaction can slash administrative overhead and labor costs.


But self-service can’t replace human interaction for specific problems and concerns—at least not in its current iteration. When things get fouled up or seem too confusing, workers want to push a button and get an answer from a living, breathing person. Moreover, many workers simply won’t use IVR or Web-based self-service tools.


“Self-service and HR call centers should be closely tied together,” explains Ken Millen, director of HR Services at Hoffman Estates, Illinois-based Sears, Roebuck & Co. Adds SPECTRUM’s Spoor: “It’s important to use a call center to add value. Today, a live person isn’t needed to tell someone how many vacation days they have available or what their balance is in their 401(k). However, a person is needed to explain and evaluate complex eligibility requirements.”


Focus on solutions rather than technology.
You’ve heard it before, but it bears repeating: Technology is simply an enabler. Vendors constantly tout features and capabilities, but when the dust settles, it’s how a company plans to use a call center that should determine what it purchases. “It’s important to understand how various products interact,” says Link. “To achieve maximum results, you have to focus on the business issue and what combination of products and features offer the most effective solution.”


Offer an IVR front end, but also consider Web-based capabilities.
Interactive voice response is an essential part of call center technology. Individuals can use the phone to conduct self-service transactions, but then connect to an appropriate call center representative by pushing a button. However, while the telephone is ubiquitous and easy to use, it’s relatively slow at navigating through long, branching menus.


The solution? A Web-based self-service system that’s linked to a call center. Although relatively few firms are now using this technology, it promises to become widespread within a couple of years. And the reason is simple: An individual can browse a Web site, look up information, update records and place transactions.


If the person runs into a problem or has a question that can’t be answered at the Web site, he or she can click a button and connect to a call center rep within seconds. The agent, using a screen pop, can view the same Web page in one window, check a knowledge-base in another, and communicate with the person via videoconferencing or IP telephony.


Market the call center and educate employees how to use it effectively.
To succeed with the two-pronged strategy of using employee self-service and call centers, it’s essential that workers know what’s in it for them and how to use the tools to maximum advantage. By touting new capabilities, features and time-saving options, large-scale acceptance of IVR and Web self-service is far more likely.


But getting employees to understand that the call center is designed to solve problems—and isn’t the most efficient way to check a 401(k) balance—requires ongoing communication. Newsletters, an intranet, or even a recording on an IVR can help guide employees through the process.


At Whirlpool, for example, HR originally sent out a newsletter every two weeks to keep employees up-to-date about new features and changes to the system. The department now sends out a quarterly newsletter. “It’s a change management issue as much as a technology issue,” says Pantelleria.


And while migrating away from face-to-face interaction isn’t easy, it can ultimately carve out huge gains for the organization. Among other things, it’s possible to reduce staffing requirements in the call center or human resources department, eliminate paperwork and transactions, and free HR staff or call center reps to engage in higher-value work.


Use specialized tools to operate the call center at maximum efficiency.
It’s possible to track call volumes, abandonment rate, calls in queue, agent status and other factors. Using such data, it’s then possible to analyze calling patterns and deploy resources as needed. Some programs, such as NovaMAX Manpower Scheduler from Nova CTI, can forecast demand and build work schedules automatically using specialized algorithms. It can schedule according to needed skills, seniority, season and other categories.


View the call center and self-service as constantly evolving tools.
It’s no bulletin that the technology that supports call centers is changing rapidly. “A call center is a constantly evolving project. You are continuously improving, coming up with new measures, surveying, and then going back to workers to communicate what is available and what has changed,” remarks Pantelleria. “You must constantly find ways to improve. That’s the nature of business today.”


Workforce, June 1999, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 123-125.


Posted on May 21, 1999July 10, 2018

MBAs Take HR to a Higher Level

Imagine you’re sitting in the conference room with your CEO and the board of directors. This is the first closed-door executive meeting to which you’ve been invited. You quickly learn that your company may merge with a 20,000-employee firm overseas. But just as you’re biting into a sugar-glazed donut, the CEO turns to you and asks, “What do you think are the financial and HR issues at stake?” Instead of responding, you shake your head to signal that speaking with food in your mouth is impolite. The truth? You have no idea what to say.


“If you want to be taken seriously by senior management, then you must play at their level,” says Doug Stirling, an employee development consultant at Frazer, Pennsylvania-based DecisionOne Corporation, a provider of technology services. “Anyone with a desire to move into an HR management position, or move outside, should pursue an MBA,” Stirling insists.


Sure, the thought of grad school is daunting—not to mention the extra time and costs of completing a demanding academic program. However, the payoff can be big and there are a number of options to choose from. Pursuing an MBA will guarantee you the skill set needed to function in HR’s new strategic role.


Although most MBA programs were at one time perceived as exclusive havens for CEO and investment-banker wannabes, according to the MBA faculty interviewed by Workforce, they’re slowly attracting HR professionals who want to upgrade their competencies and expand their career options.


Why an MBA?
Stirling has obtained both his senior HR professional (SPHR) certification and his MBA. He believes they’re complementary and round out his human resources and business skills. His purpose in getting the former was to gain credibility and provide verification that he possessed basic HR knowledge. The certificate indicates that an individual passed the HR exam awarded by Alexandria, Virginia-based Human Resource Certification Institute. “It’s good enough for the HR world, but not for the general business world,” he says. “I didn’t have an undergraduate business degree, so I was still unfamiliar with many business processes.” However, after attending Oklahoma State University for four and a half years, he completed his MBA in 1993.


The business competencies he says he acquired were financial processes, basic economics, forecasting, marketing, statistical analysis, labor relations, organizational design and development, and strategic planning to address external factors (such as mergers and acquisitions, globalization and downsizings). He recommends that upwardly mobile HR professionals consider getting both the HR certificate and MBA degree because it rounds out one’s hard and soft business skills.


Although most HR professionals pursue an MBA to gain basic business fundamentals, it’s also valuable to know that MBA programs are becoming more “HR wise.” Today, you can find programs that increasingly value the HR discipline—they integrate practical HR management skills with core business competencies.


In fact, many MBA programs have undergone a significant metamorphosis—expanding and modifying their curriculum to better meet today’s business needs. “Survey after survey of alumni, recruiters and executives found recurring criticism that graduate schools were not preparing MBAs for the real world of business. MBAs were seen as technically brilliant, but lacking in social skills,” according to Terence Hancock, chairman of the MBA program at the University of Louisville in Kentucky.


Thus, after years of criticism, academia is finally bending its ears to the needs of today’s corporate challenges. Not only are MBA students learning business fundamentals, they’re able to enroll in an emerging cluster of HR-related courses, such as “Power, Persuasion, Influence and Negotiation” and “Legal Issues in HRM: Health, Family and Privacy.”


Whereas in the past, HR may have veered more toward master’s programs in organizational development, leadership or HR management, today’s MBA programs not only offer traditional curricula about finance and marketing issues, but change management, including how to get things done and the people side of business. At some institutions, students can major in HR management. At others, HR-related courses, such as team building, are offered as first-semester requirements or as electives.


“Our biggest challenge is moving from management education to management development. We want to develop the full person,” says Susan Ashford, associate dean at the University of Michigan Business School in Ann Arbor. “We may debate the balance, but we don’t debate the goal of developing [well-rounded] graduates.”


So if you’re stuck in corporate limbo, consider seeking your MBA—but not for the short-term dream of a six-digit salary. It’s not that you won’t get a return on your educational investment. If you remain in the HR field, you may be qualified for a promotion and a 15 to 20 percent increase in your current salary, according to Stirling. But keep in mind, general MBA salaries can still be as low as $39,600, according to The Official MBA Guide, issued by Orlando-based Unicorn Research Association. Not every MBA student can expect to yield a starting salary of $102,630, which is par for Harvard University graduates who enter non-HR fields, such as investment banking and marketing. And according to Fortune, 1999 MBA graduates will likely get an average annual salary of $84,828, up 16 percent from two years ago.


So first and foremost, pursue your MBA for long-term development and professional credentials. If you want to be a strategic player, you’ll have to understand budgets, strategic planning, economic forecasts and change management. Indeed, an MBA isn’t just for CEOs. It’s increasingly valuable for HR leaders.


And the winners are… ?
Each year, Business Week ranks the top 25 business schools in the country. Based on student and employer responses to a questionnaire, MBA programs either move up, down—or off the list. For example, Cornell University’s Johnson Graduate School of Management vaulted 10 spots, to No. 8, after instituting a new approach to the curriculum and an administration more inclusive of students. “We had been experiencing a steady decline in our ranking. It was a wake-up call,” says Bonalyn J. Nelsen, assistant professor of organization studies at the S.C. Johnson Graduate School of Management at Ithaca, New York-based Cornell University. Today, Cornell’s MBA students are offered immersion courses in their second semester that target a particular industry, such as manufacturing, financing or marketing. All classes—15 credits worth—are geared toward the chosen area.


“The activities include field trips, seminars, guest speakers and onsite visits to local businesses,” explains Nelsen. “The thrust of our change was to make the coursework shorter, more concentrated and focused.” Based on such changes Cornell improved its ranking this year, doubling its admissions. The magazine’s rankings, she adds, can make or break an institution’s academic standing and quality of recruits. However, for HR professionals, it’s one form of benchmarking when you’re shopping around for the right program.


In terms of providing useful data, Business Week solicits the customer’s point of view to rate the quality of business education. The results come from asking students and the companies that hire them to rate their experiences. Extensive questionnaires for this year’s rankings were sent to 9,598 graduating MBA students at 61 schools—the magazine’s largest survey ever—as well as to 350 companies that actively recruit. The magazine heard back from 6,020 students and 259 companies. (Visit http://www.businessweek.com/1998/42/b3600003.htm for the survey results.)


Graduates—who judge only their own schools—were asked to give their views on such issues as teaching quality, program content and career placement. Recruiters were asked to assess the skills of the students and rank the schools on their overall quality and the success rate of graduates in their organizations.


Ranked this year as schools with the most innovative curricula were:


  • University of Michigan
  • University of Pennsylvania (The Wharton School)
  • Northwestern University (Kellogg Graduate School of Management)
  • Harvard University
  • University of Chicago.

MBA schools, such as those listed above, have evolved over the years. They’re the most visible pacesetters influencing curricula at state universities and colleges across the country—many, at lower costs. Clearly, the old model of producing either general managers or functional specialists is no longer sufficient in today’s global environment. What’s needed are leaders with broad experience, says Dr. Thomas P. Gerrity, dean of the Wharton School at Philadelphia-based University of Pennsylvania. Individuals can discuss the nuts and bolts of operations with an employee on the line, and a few hours later talk corporate strategy with the board of directors. They can review marketing plans over breakfast and discuss an organizational design plan over dinner.


Given today’s business demands, many MBA programs have undergone their own versions of reengineering. There are several significant trends that should be of interest to HR. They pertain to the areas of MBA course work, program design and corporate partnerships.


MBA curriculum begins to acknowledge people skills.
George W. Hettenhouse refers to the new MBA as “a journey just begun.” Many MBA programs, he says, began their change process in the early 1990s, driven by blunt feedback from the business community. Top management says they want individuals with a broad understanding of the business world and strong leadership skills, says Hettenhouse, professor of finance at Bloomington-based Indiana University. “We’ve tried to be different in our approach,” he says.


Indiana University’s MBA students can declare human resources management as a major or minor through the Department of Management. In addition to core courses, such as “Staffing Systems” and “Analyzing Entrepreneurial Opportunities,” students can select any six credit hours from the HRM major list. For example: “Technology and Tools for Managing HR Systems,” provides hands-on experience with functional and integrative techniques. “Aligning Business and Human Resource Strategy” covers how to formulate selection, reward and development systems that reinforce the behaviors required for implementing a company’s primary business focus and strategy. The curriculum, Hettenhouse explains, is applied and grounded in examples from major companies and case analysis.


At other MBA programs, such as The Wharton School, students are only required to take two HR-related courses during their first year: “Teamwork Skills” and “Managing People.” At most business schools, management is only one part of the MBA program, and HRM is still viewed as a smaller part of that. “It’s always been a relatively small part of any curriculum,” says Peter Cappelli, professor of management at The Wharton School. But MBA programs around the country are slowly coming around.


Whether MBA programs provide HR coursework as a major, requirement or elective depends on several factors, he explains. Business schools are political institutions with competition among every functional area and discipline. Much of that depends on faculty support, student receptivity and interest. “It’s a tough road. HR is still viewed as a problem area, rather than a vibrant, stimulating area,” says Cappelli. As one MBA professor put it: “HR is still perceived as an administrative ‘ghetto.’”


Nevertheless, what HR professionals should know is that MBA programs are beginning to acknowledge and provide some HR-related coursework. For example, every MBA student at the Kellogg Graduate School of Management (Northwestern University) is required to take a practical course called “Strategies for Managing Organizations.” The course teaches people skills such as how to lead teams, motivate people, handle cross-cultural issues and negotiate labor contracts. “It’s a very popular required course,” says Bob Duncan, the Richard Thomas professor of leadership and organizational change at Kellogg. “Our students are known for their ability to implement change, to make things happen in their organizations.”


As few or far between as these courses may be, they’re becoming more standard. But those courses alone shouldn’t be the sole basis for selecting a particular MBA program. Keep in mind that the value of a current HR professional obtaining an MBA is not to learn HR fundamentals. The main reason for pursuing an MBA should still be to learn basic business fundamentals, such as financing, marketing and systems management—key knowledge areas that aren’t provided through current HR certification programs.


Team concepts drive program designs.
At the University of Michigan Business School, MBA students are offered a multi-dimensional approach to learning called MAP (Multidisciplinary Action Project). It’s a new, in-company teaching model that integrates the Business School and the business world.


For example, the school partners with companies such as Citibank, Boeing, Whirlpool and Medtronic to identify areas of need that yield education-enhancing assignments for seven weeks. Through MAP, groups of students work with a team of six, cross-functional faculty members, who serve as subject-area experts, advisors and coaches. “The students have to go out to companies to analyze [a problem] and recommend the changes,” says Ashford. The students also receive support from an experienced team-effectiveness expert who instructs each team on state-of-the-art techniques in team building, conflict management and problem solving. Additional training and development focuses on communication and presentations, process mapping and project scoping. Michigan faculty experts and practitioners from major consulting firms lead the workshops.


At Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business, MBA students also participate in teams, says Hettenhouse. Not only do teams carry out a variety of projects, some have even experimented with team-based examinations: Members pick up the marketing midterm, for example, at 8 a.m. and are required to turn in a word-processed, Excel®-analyzed solution by 5 p.m.


Performance evaluations are also team-based. “Peer feedback on teams is crucial to their success,” says Hettenhouse. The Kelley School focuses on two types. The first teaches and encourages students to give feedback to one another on team processes and functioning independent of the faculty member. In other words, there is no grading element involved. Secondly, faculty at the Kelley School of Business meets with the teams at the end of each semester to learn the relative contribution of each member during team assignments. Based on the positive and negative feedback the faculty receives, students are given their appropriate ratings. Therefore, the process yields higher evaluations and grades for the most active team players.


In summary, the new MBA models for learning arm students with more applied knowledge, rather than abstract business theories. The challenges for students, faculty and administrators are substantially greater than in the past because it requires more interface between the business, psychology and HR management departments and faculty. “The coordinated and integrated approach is clearly the way to go,” says Hettenhouse. “What’s not so clear at the moment is how to get there.” As MBA programs continue to experiment with the best forms of aligning higher education with practical business needs, HR’s participation and feedback is critical.


For example, Stirling has no regrets over his decision to obtain an MBA. Although it took him four and a half years to complete his coursework, he was able to apply the knowledge immediately at his full-time job. When the American Disabilities Act was signed into law, Stirling was still in graduate school. As a result, he wrote a school paper on the ADA and its effect on organizations. “This research and knowledge was used to develop training programs for management,” says Stirling.


Adds Susan Kennedy, director of human resources at New York City-based New York Academy of Sciences: “I was in a career change mode. With no corporate HR experience, I thought the MBA would help me catch up. It did. My concentration at [New York City-based] Pace University was in HR. The management courses familiarized me with employment law, which would’ve taken a long time to get through experience alone. I gained skills and confidence in the training course I’ve [developed].”


So whether you look for an MBA program on Business Week’s Top 25 list or a less expensive program at a local college, assess your individual career goals first. If they align with your company’s business goals, you’re more likely to get management support: tuition reimbursement, time off for study, possible promotion or a salary increase upon graduation.


But don’t expect any or all of the above. Your decision to pursue an MBA is really up to you. Employer support is icing on the cake. In fact, many of your colleagues have pursued MBAs without employer support. Why? The benefits to one’s career are so far-reaching: a solid grounding in business fundamentals, state-of-the-art knowledge in HR management, improved self-confidence, greater ability to influence change, respect from your peers and senior executives. Most of all, you’ll have the satisfaction of knowing you rose to the academic challenge. Now isn’t that better than sitting clueless with a donut in your mouth?


Workforce, May 1999, Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 81-87.


Posts navigation

Previous page Page 1 … Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 … Page 591 Next page

 

Webinars

 

White Papers

 

 
  • Topics

    • Benefits
    • Compensation
    • HR Administration
    • Legal
    • Recruitment
    • Staffing Management
    • Training
    • Technology
    • Workplace Culture
  • Resources

    • Subscribe
    • Current Issue
    • Email Sign Up
    • Contribute
    • Research
    • Awards
    • White Papers
  • Events

    • Upcoming Events
    • Webinars
    • Spotlight Webinars
    • Speakers Bureau
    • Custom Events
  • Follow Us

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • Advertise

    • Editorial Calendar
    • Media Kit
    • Contact a Strategy Consultant
    • Vendor Directory
  • About Us

    • Our Company
    • Our Team
    • Press
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Use
Proudly powered by WordPress